Episode Summary:

The document "Kondratiev's Revenge" delves into the economic landscape marked by significant transitions, particularly highlighting the surge in Bitcoin's value as an indicator of broader economic shifts. The text begins by acknowledging the rise of Bitcoin to over $60,000, suggesting a crackup boom phase indicative of the end stages of fiat currency systems. This phase is not seen as the demise of capitalism but rather the collapse of the fiat currency, central banking, and global reserve systems. The document emphasizes capitalism as the only effective natural economic system, criticizing socialism and communism as ideologies that ultimately fail due to their inherent flaws.

The narrative then shifts to predict Bitcoin's continued rise within the context of this economic crackup boom, suggesting that as fiat currencies degrade, Bitcoin and possibly other commodities like silver and gold will see significant increases in value. However, not all commodities, such as real estate, are expected to participate in this upward trend. The document forecasts a further degradation in the real estate market, particularly commercial real estate in the U.S., which is described as having already collapsed with no immediate prospects for recovery.

As the discussion progresses, the document outlines a future where Bitcoin could potentially reach $120,000 by around April 19, driven by transaction volumes and the halving event. This prediction extends to a vision of Bitcoin surpassing a million dollars by 2025, marking the end of the petrodollar's dominance. The narrative encompasses the implications of such economic shifts, including the transformation of the European Union, described as an engineered attempt at unification since the 1960s, now facing the reality of its disintegration.

The text also touches upon the social and economic implications of this transition, including the potential for increased economic disparity, the challenges of integrating cryptocurrencies into mainstream financial systems, and the broader societal impacts of a shift away from fiat currencies. The document suggests that the economic upheaval will be accompanied by social chaos, engineered by the ideologies and actions of what it refers to as "mother wefers," leading to contention and a lack of easy resolutions.

Key takeaways from "Kondratiev's Revenge" include the prediction of Bitcoin's ascent as a reflection of the fiat currency system's failure, the critique of socialism and communism in favor of capitalism, and the anticipation of significant economic shifts impacting commodities, real estate, and the global financial system. The document posits a future where digital currencies play a central role in the new economic order, challenging traditional financial institutions and systems.

In conclusion, "Kondratiev's Revenge" presents a complex portrait of an impending economic transformation driven by the rise of cryptocurrencies, the failure of fiat currencies, and the inadequacies of existing economic ideologies. It forecasts a tumultuous yet potentially lucrative future for those invested in digital currencies, while also highlighting the broader economic, social, and political challenges that such a transition entails.

#Bitcoin #CrackUpBoom #FiatCurrencyCollapse #Capitalism #SocialismFailure #CommunismFailure #EconomicPredictions #GoldSilverRise #RealEstateCollapse #GlobalEconomy #PetrodollarDemise #CryptocurrencyFuture #EconomicTransformation #DigitalScarcity #WealthTransfer #EconomicDegradation #FiatCurrencyDegradation #CommercialRealEstateCrisis #InvestmentShift #DigitalCurrencies #Monero #Ethereum #Litecoin #CryptocurrencyBoom #BitcoinMillion #EconomicForecast #CurrencyDevaluation #GlobalFinancialSystem #EconomicCrisis #FinancialFreedom #AssetValuation #Inflation #EconomicShockwaves #MarketDynamics #InvestmentTrends

Key Takeaways:

Bitcoin's value is surging, indicating the start of a crackup boom and the end of fiat currency dominance.
Socialism and communism are criticized as inherently flawed ideologies against the backdrop of capitalism's effectiveness.
Bitcoin is predicted to reach $120,000 around April 19, and potentially exceed a million dollars by 2025.
The commercial real estate market in the U.S. has collapsed, not expected to recover soon.
The degradation of fiat currencies and the global economic implications, particularly for the petrodollar system, are highlighted.

Predictions:

Bitcoin will potentially double in value by April 19, reaching $120,000.
Bitcoin's price might hit over a million dollars each by 2025, signifying the end of the petrodollar.
Commercial real estate will not recover under the current financial system, leading to further economic degradation.

Key Players:

Bitcoin
Ethereum
Litecoin
Monero
Federal Reserve
European Central Bank
European Union

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Kondratiev's Revenge - 02-28-2024

Hello humans. Hello humans. February 28, a little after eight in the morning, I'm running a little tiny bit late. Gotta get my ass into town and have a, got a couple of appointments I gotta get get to one will take about an hour, and then I can do some semi regular shopping and then go meet with these other guys and discuss a few things and then head back outbound anyway, so all kinds of things to talk about here, let me get my stuff settled.

So bitcoin is up to over 60,000 this morning.

The projections on that are pretty clear at this point. As I had said, we're into the period of the crackup boom. This is the contratif understanding of how fiat currency systems end. It's not capitalism dying, it's the fiat currency, central bank, global reserve thing that's dying. Right?

Capitalism is the only effective natural economic system. Socialism, communism, all of these kind of things are artifacts, are ideologies that are laid over the economics, and they don't really work, and they always crap out, and they always crap out violently because of the nature of the hatred that is inbuilt into socialism and communism. These are hateful ideologies that have flaws built into their very nature by the fact that they were invented as whole structures by the Elohim worship cult. Anyway, so bitcoin's way up last month or so, and it will continue to rise as we get further into the crack up boom. We can expect some pretty spectacular dollar numbers relative to bitcoin.

And then maybe ultimately we're going to break open the suppression and control on silver and gold, and we'll see them follow the same kind of path as bitcoin within the crack up boom. So we'll see commodities, okay? It's not going to be all commodities because some things like real estate, are not necessarily going to participate. It's an interesting time. So I'm actually expecting, as bitcoin prices rise, continue to rise, as gold and silver keep banging against that wall of suppression, I'm expecting further degradation in the real estate market, to the point that we'll actually have mainstream media having to comment on the collapse of real estate.

It's already started with the commercial real estate. And so the commercial real estate market in the US basically has collapsed, and it is not going to recover anytime soon, and it's very likely not ever going to recover under a Federal Reserve node petrodollar. So that's what's dying, okay? The petrodollar that backs all the other fiat currencies is dying. The European Union thinks that they can keep their, the European Central bank thinks they can keep their aggregate euro currency going, and it's already dying and they're just scrambling like mad to try and keep it together against the continuing breakup of their European Union, which was not an organic thing.

It was engineered since the 1960s. I saw the beginning of that. I saw the beginning of the mother Weffers push towards a common united Europe that they could wield like the United States as a single entity. I saw that in the 60s with the introduction of the common market language and how they started changing and doing their social engineering then, because that was anti organic kind of mood, I guess you'd say. So the popular mood after World War II was everybody go home and lick their wounds, tighten up, clean up all of this kind of stuff.

Instead, the globalists push and push and push to get this, quote, democratization of Europe, which means the destruction of the republics and smoosh them all together into the EU. And we're here now. So bitcoin's going to be going up. All the cryptos will go up to a certain extent. Many cryptos will die in the near future.

All right, so we're talking a few months and we'll start seeing some level of crypto death. Just even as we're seeing new all time highs for bitcoin and all different kinds of currencies, we're very close to that in the dollar. Once we get a new all time high, over 63,000 in bitcoin in the dollar, then it will really rush up. The projections are by a lot of people that are doing charting this kind of shit. The projections are that bitcoin is going to scale up fairly rapidly as we approach the having, which is estimated to be April 19.

Now, based on how much, many transactions, really how many transactions are in the blockchain? And so the projection is April 19 as we go through there. The projections are that the bitcoin price will exceed $120,000 us. So it would double from today's value over these next few months, assuming we follow the more or less regular pattern that we encountered, that we all have so far encountered in having years. So if we have that, we'll go up over 120,000, maybe that takes into fall or something, and then there will be a pullback.

It might be a 20,000 or $30,000 pullback. And so bitcoin might drop back down into the upper 90s. Right. Okay, so what are these guys doing here? Hang on, I've got some squeeze driving to do between buses and weird ass contractor guys.

Okay, so bitcoin goes up to the 120,000, drops down into the upper 90s, makes a floor into the upper ninety s, and then pushes through that floor and beyond the rest of this year, as the fiat currencies continue their degradation and the social chaos that was engineered and built into the cake now by the actions of the mother wefers. So there will be contention with all of the invaders. They're here. We've got to deal with them. There won't be an easy resolution.

They're not going to become nice and peaceful USA or european citizens. Their intent is to invade and take over and cause problems. So this will occur, that's going to further cause degradations within the economic system because you can't have activity as normal when you're in the process of being invaded and fighting off an invading force.

This is going to be the rest of this year. We'll be going through this. The economic aspect of it, the actual production of goods and services and all of that kind of stuff is going to take a hit as well. This will also affect the underpinnings of the ability to satisfy debt in the fiat currencies, because that's all they are. They're just a mechanism for dealing with debt.

They're not really money per se. They're a debt that you take on when you use their currencies. So this will continue to degrade and will even accelerate as we go through the year. So it might be very feasible that we have a solid floor in bitcoin, around $100,000 by the time we get to Christmas. Thus we'll meet the conditions for the $100,000 bitcoin parties during a Christmas season that were in the altar reports, and it would make sense.

So we'll go up to 120, and then we'll crash back down. It won't be a crash, it'll be a reduction, a consolidation, whatever you want to call it. Go back down to in the upper ninety s and then fight our way over 100,000 by Christmas as a solid floor. Okay? And so this is the action within fiat currency worlds relative to the fiat currency is the sudden rise, the boom, then the retraction, the pullback, and then consolidation and flooring, and then another rise.

Now the expectation is just doing projections off of charts and stuff. So I don't have any data, but these chartists, I'm just looking at their stuff, and the projection is that in 2025 we'll see bitcoin over a million dollars each. And this will be truly the end of the petrodollar as we get into those kind of numbers. It just won't be worth even messing with as a debt settling instrument. So bitcoin will be, BTC will be hugely impacted over these next two years, and it will carry along with it a number of related currencies.

And this will include all of the BTC clones, but also it'll bring in Ethereum and litecoin Monero. Monero is going to have a really big future here, especially in these next couple of years, as the status go fucking batshit and try and control everything. And so Monero will be used as a relatively non traceable settlement vehicle. It'll have a lot of demand. Beyond that, there are going to be other alt cryptos that survive for various different reasons, but at this point, it's sort of a crapshoot betting on any individual technology, unless you've really gone into those technologies and really examine them and understand where the utility is and why they will survive this period of time.

The period of time we're coming into is going to force everybody back to solid money, to realistic valuations on stuff. As the petrodollar dies and then all of the other fiat currencies that are attached to it, they're all dying now, right? So we're seeing that now, bitcoin is making all time highs in number of different languages, currencies, including in Japanese, right? So japanese currency is very stable, usually. And for it to be making these kind of big new all time highs in bitcoin, for bitcoin in yen, is really a very telling issue.

So we're just here now. And so there's going to be, this is the wealth transfer period where those people that were hodlers and got into the idea of digital scarcity and settlement vehicles versus hard currency and so on, are going to benefit for that attention to the currency and all things economic, and they're going to benefit for their acumen and for their courage in acting against the general trend and herd. Right? So bitcoin people, very likely the Hodlers, none of those people took the shot because it's the same kind of. Maybe some of the money manager kind of guys did, but mostly the individual bitcoiners.

I bet you they didn't take any of the clot shots, because it's the same kind of process that allows you to be courageous and make a move early and ahead and against the existing trends that will propel you into this intergenerational wealth stuff. Right? Same thing with silver, buying silver way the hell back when, when it was $8 an ounce for junk silver means you were that precious, that much ahead. And so those are the people that are being rewarded now by the activity within, the degradation of the fiat currency and the wealth transfer aspect of it. Remember, wealth does not go away.

It doesn't disappear unless you bury it in the ground and die, and thus, no one knows it's there. So that's really the only way that this kind of stuff goes away. You'll always lose a little bit here and there, but in general, wealth sticks around. It just transfers from one form to another as you go through into the future here.

And we're in one of those transitional periods now. This is going to be relatively exciting for people. You'll have all kinds of people getting whipped up all time highs in dollars for bitcoin are always something that everybody gets excited about. Also, this time, it's going to be coincident with all kinds of crapola going on in the general dynamism of the populace. So we're just about to get into March.

We'll probably cross a couple of significant bitcoin thresholds here in March. Maybe we'll go up another 20 or so percent fairly rapidly in bitcoin and get up over the 75,000 mark. It's not resistance in that sense, in the chartist sense, but it is a key peg at 75,000 for a bitcoin because that was in data sets way back when, as a minor temporal marker, there's another very large temporal marker, which is 88,000. Right. And so bitcoin had this thing back in the day, way back when, when the data set said that it would rise up to $880, and then it would fall back, and then it would do this three times, and then it was never, ever going to go back down below 880.

We have that same kind of language for 88,000. Okay, so it'll go through 88,000, and then it will set a floor in the range of 88,000. Maybe it'll come down to 84,000 and then go back up to 88 and then come back down and then go back up. But it'll do the 88 business three times. Right.

So it'll go through 88,003 times, and then it's done with 88,000 series of ferns, and we won't be repeating that. So then it'll go on up to its 120,000. So maybe that'll be. Maybe we'll reach those kind of milestones post having. So sometime after the 19 April, maybe we'll get into those kind of numbers.

Bear in mind, it's not bitcoin that's becoming more valuable. Well, it is in a sense, because value is an emotional attachment to an idea like bitcoin or gold or silver or whatever. It's an emotional thing.

But after the having is when I suspect that we'll start going through some of these very key temporal markers relative to Fern, to bitcoin prices, and that those will also be commensurate with all of the activity that's ongoing through this period of time. So in March, we're going to have lots and lots and lots of violent activity, new stuff happening. This will include reactions within the currency and economic situation relative to.

So basically what's going to happen is that there will actually be reactions within the social order about the pricing and so forth in ferns of various different kinds of commodities. And these things will have shock.

They'll initiate shocks within the social order. So it's going to be a huge shock when silver breaks out of its value range that it's being constrained in. This will happen because of some breakdowns that will occur within the, quote exchange system, which is really a control mechanism. And so the bitcoin and its fern price, also, it's priced in kroner or whatever the hell, right? All these other currencies, it'll be making new highs in all these global currencies as we get to the point where that triggers things within the control mechanism and starts affecting the price of silver and to a lesser extent of gold.

So it might well be that by the time we get into 2025, we've got gold at maybe it's doubled in price, maybe it's in the $5,000 an ounce range. And at that point, silver should have busted out to where it's broken through 50 $8100 an ounce. So we have language now in the minimalist little bit of scraping I can do. So let me emphasize that I do not have the hundreds of millions of reads that I used to in my processing because of the situation, the costs and so on that are involved in that at this day and age, as well as the bandwidth, I just don't have that here.

I had one third of a t one line, so vast quantities of bandwidth at my old office before we moved. Now out here on the coast, I just have to deal with the best bandwidth you can get on a residential line. I had had a special line run into me from the phone company at a huge cost back in Olympia at our other address, I think it was done in when we do, maybe that was 2002. I did that. It was fantastically huge cost.

It cost like $1,600 to run that line. We had to drive it under the road and tunnel up 100 plus feet to get it into the house. But it was huge bandwidth. I mean, it's just incredible anyway, though, so I don't have that now. So all of my projections are based on a minimalist data set.

So the probability of errors is very high. And the probability that the errors are going to be wildly off is very high as well. So if I'm going to put an error on this, it should be ending up as pretty spectacular. Error 830, I can probably make it here. I have a bunch of stops, so I got to do all these little chores as well as these couple of meetings.

I'm going to try and squeeze in a little chore before I get into that first meeting, shorten some of the duration. We've got our sick dog and my wife is just not really health wise, just up to dealing with all kinds of stuff. So I want to try and get back as soon as I can anyway, though.

So I expect that we'll have kinetic activity in March. We'll have frenetic freak out kind of economic activity in April. We're going to have all kinds of information that comes out as a result of this. Simply because as the dollar degrades, there's less ability to pay people to keep their mouth shut is fundamentally what it amounts to. Right.

The whole system is breaking down because the dollar is breaking down, because the Federal Reserve note is breaking down to the point where it has no purchasing value and people have no confidence in it. So they're going to act differently, and they already are. We're seeing the effects of that all over.

So I personally think this is a very exciting time. I have some bitcoin, I have a few of those guys, so I'm interested in following along with it. However, my real problem is I'm feeling so soviet, right? I feel like I'm back in the USSR in my day in the. There was a joke that in the Soviet Union, you worked your ass off and you made good money, but there was nothing to.

So that was it. If you saw a line on a street corner near any kind of a store, you went and got in that line because it meant there was something in that store to buy and everybody had money because there was nothing to buy with the money. So it's just a weird situation. So for me, it's kind of like that. So I was lamenting the other day about how soviet I feel because I can't find a single story house, right?

I mean, I can find them that are six and 7 hours away, but that's just not feasible. We're just not going to be able to do that. It has to meet certain criteria anyway relative to, like wheelchair access and that sort of thing. And the number of bedrooms. If it's a single story house, no problem.

But in any event, so I can't find one. So I'm feeling very soviet, right? Like if I saw a big line in front of a real estate agency, I'd go and get there. But any event though. So here's the thing about real estate, because I got to wrap this up fairly quick.

Commercial real estate has collapsed. The amount of bad debt associated with commercial real estate, right, now that they know the debt is bad, that is that people are behind on payments on commercial real estate. They're not making their mortgage on time or barely making it on time, whereas before they would pay it early, that kind of thing. All of these indicators are showing that commercial real estate has just totally crapped out. Now, the extent of the commercial real estate that has already crapped out means that the entire banking system in the United States, as well as the banking system, most of the banking system in Europe cannot come up with reserves to cover the losses.

And this is not the complete collapse yet of the commercial real estate market, meaning that we're looking at a breakdown of commercial real estate at a level that has not ever been seen before in our modern society. And if we look at, and there is no analog for it in previous times, it's at that level. So just absolutely staggering, the complete, the complete involvement of this. So if we were to take basically all commercial real estate, then the amount of loss reserves the banks would have to have is about 18 times what they've got set aside, 18 times. So they've only got 118 of the loss reserves necessary to cover the commercial real estate market as it exists now in its totality.

But in fact, the whole system is reeling with it. Only one 18th broken down. Right.

Like I was saying, I know guys that like myself, for whatever reason, they were hunting for older guys that are hunting for houses and trying to move and this sort of thing, mostly people with cryptos. So they feel they've got the financial freedom to do this at this time, and they're looking at commercial real estate because there's not much in the way of residential real estate being sold or offered even, because even if you wanted to sell your house, there's no house for you to buy. And the minute you sell your house and convert that house into dollars, the dollars start depreciating, like, right the fuck away. And so you're running up against a decreasing amount of value that you've converted your house out of, and then you're trying to get that money converted back into a new house, and they're just not available or whatever. Also, a lot of them still have high prices, expecting to be able to recover some of the amount of debt in there.

So a lot of the houses have very high prices on them because the level of debt that has to be satisfied in the sale. So I know some houses now where they, I don't know if people are going to try and flip them or what the deal is. That whole, quote, industry is really tanked. But I know a couple of houses where the owners are basically wrestling to see if they're going to accept offers that are below assessed value. So this is that point of time where we reconvert wealth and taxes and so on.

So all these counties are freaking out because houses aren't selling. They get some money in the process of the house sale, but also it sets a new base for them relative to land taxes. And those are dropping because the sales price is less than the county's already assessed value. They can't have that legally. They have to adjust it downward to the actual sales price.

And this is the same mechanism that destroyed the land tax base for the counties, especially out in the know anything west of the Ohio river valley, but also, but throughout the entire country was seriously affected in the Great Depression. And the mechanism was that the land prices were, sales were at such a low level and that affected the tax base.

Counties don't like it. There's nothing they can do about it. But this is the state of affairs at the moment. So real estate is not necessarily going to be a good investment, especially for short term kind of stuff. So I just want a new house.

I'm not looking at an investment. I just want to get away from all of the noise and the crap of adding this and rebuilding the house I'm in. I really have to. The contractor really fucked me over there and the things he did. And I've got some serious issues with that house that I'm wrestling with.

So I just want to get another house to go and live in while all this is going on. I'm not after any kind of long term gain and stuff. If I were I would still be looking into commercial real estate, because this stuff is so hugely undervalued. And you're finding if you look, you can find places where the value of the property to you is such that if you make an offer that can be used as leverage with the banks to get people out from under the debt, they will do so. So I know of one place where an old restaurant was sold for a guy, to a guy, and he's converting it into a house.

And when he bought that, it had been on the market for, jeez, maybe twelve years or something like that, and he picked it up and offered some small fraction, let's just say that he offered like one fifth or something of the notional value at the time that it was listed.

So that was not enough to satisfy the debt on this property that just sat there. But the bank, it had been in arrears for a number of years. The guy making some level of payments, just enough to keep it going. And the guy went with the offer back to the bank and said, what can we do? And they said, okay, we'll go with you on this amount.

We'll forgive this amount of the debt if you accept this offer and you pay off this other amount of the debt. And so they worked it out. And so basically the bank took a big hit on it. And this guy took a big hit on it. And my friend bought this place, which he's now putting money into, in order to turn it into a house from a restaurant.

And in some places, that's what we're going to have to do.

Trying to see where I've got. Okay, there we are.

Anyway, so that's the state of affairs here. I'm still sort of looking for a house. I'm in the process of getting the next phase of my addition going here. So we're going to have the engineering and the plans. I'll submit those.

I don't really give a rat's ass about the county's opinion of stuff, but I'm going to do it just to be legal. If they slow me down, then we'll go into an illegal state where I'll just say, yeah, piss on it, I don't give a shit. We're doing it. But in any event. So the next thing is to get the heat pump moved.

Well, the next thing is to get some more lumber or logs out of the place and a couple of large stumps removed, and then to get the heat pump moved and the foundation started. Now, the good news for me at a personal level is that there's a lot of crews available, starting to become available because work is drying up. Not that many people are out here building houses and stuff. So those new housing starts are way down all over, which means that there's more crews for remodels and things. Not a good thing economically, but at least I'll be able to keep a couple of people employed with their crews here as we go forward for at least a brief bit of time.

So they'll get some money this year. That's just the situation that we've got. Anyway, like I say, bitcoin is probably going to retreat after it gets up to about 118 to 120,000 something in there. And then that retracement will be the floor. So it goes from 120 down to upper 90s, is my thinking.

And then after that, that's the floor for it. And we go back up into the over 100,000 by Christmas of this year. And that's our floor for 2025. And then we rush on in to the millions as the fiat currency totally breaks down. Okay, so a little early, but I'll get it in.

Let's see if I can get in early on this. All right, guys, so I'll do a other one of these on the way out. There's so much to talk about. Yes. So, anyway, have fun.

Previous Blog Posts:

View me!

Speculation Vs Investment – 01-03-2023

Speculation Vs Investment - 01-03-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The document "Speculation Vs Investment" by Clif High, published on January 3, 2024, delves into the intricacies of fiat and hard currencies and their impact on economic cycles and individual financial strategies. High discusses the emerging trend of hard currencies, notably the BRICS currencies backed by physical resources, marking a departure from purely fiat systems. He outlines China's strategy of gold accumulation and distribution among its populace, preparing for a future where gold and possibly other hard assets play a central role in economic transactions.

High discusses the inherent instability of fiat economies, characterized by speculative boom and bust cycles fueled by emotional investments and low-cost currency printing. He contrasts this with hard currency economies, where investments are more tangible and grounded in real value, leading to more stable and sustained economic growth. He also highlights the technological and economic shifts, including the rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which both demonstrate and catalyze the movement towards more secure and value-based financial systems.

High further analyzes the concept of speculation versus investment, emphasizing that in a fiat system, most activities are speculative due to the emotional and transient nature of value. In contrast, a sound money economy fosters true investment, where value is derived from the actual performance and utility of assets. He explores the potential future scenarios, including a significant shift towards sound money systems and the implications of such a transition for global economies and individual financial strategies.

Throughout the document, High provides a detailed narrative of economic history, present conditions, and future predictions, intertwining his personal experiences and broader economic theories. He offers a critical perspective on current economic practices and advocates for a more stable, value-oriented approach to currency and investment.

#Speculation #Investment #FiatCurrencies #HardCurrencies #EconomicCycles #BoomBust #GoldStandard #BRICSCurrencies #ChinaGold #Inflation #Deflation #Bitcoin #Cryptocurrencies #SoundMoney #ValueBased #Investing #WealthTransfer #FinancialSystems #CurrencyBacked #ResourceEconomy #MonetaryPolicy #EconomicStability #Hyperinflation #PreciousMetals #Silver #MarketEmotions #SpeculativeInvesting #EconomicHistory #FuturePredictions #ValueInvestment #GlobalEconomy #FinancialStrategy #EconomicShift #AssetManagement #FiatInstability

Key Takeaways:

Fiat vs Hard Currency: Detailed analysis of the unstable nature of fiat currencies and the shift towards more stable, resource-backed hard currencies.
Economic Cycles: Exploration of boom and bust cycles in fiat economies, driven by speculative investments.
China's Gold Strategy: Insight into China's approach to distributing gold among its populace to prepare for a hard currency future.
Investment Philosophy: Contrast between speculation in fiat economies and true investment in sound money economies.
Cryptocurrencies: Discussion on the role and potential of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in future economic systems.
Predictions and Warnings: Warnings about the dire consequences of not transitioning to sound economic systems and predictions about the movement towards resource-backed currencies.

Predictions:

Reemergence of Hard Currencies: Hard currencies, particularly those backed by BRICS nations, will gain prominence.
China's Economic Strategy: China will successfully distribute gold, fostering a population of gold-savvy citizens ready for hard currency.
Shift in Investment Strategies: A global shift from speculative investment to value-based investment will occur, dramatically changing personal finance and wealth accumulation strategies.
Technological and Economic Shift: Cryptocurrencies and other technological advancements will play a crucial role in the transition to a sound money economy.
Global Economic Transformation: The transition to sound money economies will have profound global economic impacts, requiring adaptation and consideration of new financial paradigms.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Speculation Vs Investment - 01-03-2023

Hello, humans. Hello humans.

Some early in the morning, a few minutes after eight, starting to rush into town. I'm running a little bit late here, and I've got a. Got to go get blood drawn. Have an appointment for that.

As you're an old guy, you got all these medical things, right? Mostly I don't fuck with doctors at all. So I have a concierge doctor and I'm just doing monitoring, right, because I've had the cancer and so on. So I want to keep track of what the hell is going on inside my body in an objective fashion of actual reports of what's going on, blood wise and so on. So anyway, I got to get in and get that done.

I'm running a little bit late. I was doing some organization and planning and getting things going for the house remodel for the house extension. And that cut into my time. I just sort of lost track of what was going on. Now I got to beat feet and get it in there anyway, though.

Crap. Shit. Okay. Giant road blockages here. Oh, they're hauling material down to the beach.

Bunch of the four of the dump trucks with the pups on the back.

Anyway, so I wanted to talk about some of the non considered. So people just don't think about it. Effects of the difference between fiat currency and hard currency. And I want to talk about it because we're going to be coming up to a point of a reemergence of hard currency. In fact, it is reemerging now in the form of the BRICS currencies, okay?

Because the BRICS currencies are going to, even though they're fiat, they're being backed by resources from those countries, okay?

And we know that we're on the move to a hard resource backed currency from literally, literally millions of little indicators, right? But there's a bunch of giant big ones. One of the big ones is that China, the government of the country, is buying gold and silver as fast as it is able to obtain it without altering prices. And on top of that, they are facilitating, not just allowing, but they're actually facilitating the introduction of gold and silver, less silver, but more gold, through their population in as wide a possible manner. So in the past, it would be rich people.

So in a fiat currency, rich people would buy and hoard gold for the long term capital gains as the fiat currencies inflate their way to worthlessness. And so you just see a lot of the rich guys have gold, right? China is not taking that approach. China has come up with this. Beans, gold beans, like they're the size of a small red bean, right?

So we're talking little tiny droplets, so to speak, of gold. They're not formed, they're not flattened, they're not made into little coins. They're just left as a bean, a bean of gold. And so all of the kids in China, they know this shit's coming. They see what their government's doing, they're suffering under the oppression of it, and they're dealing with all of the problems of a very poorly managed global fiat currency scheme.

And so they know what's coming. They're not stupid. And they're buying these little gold beans as fast as they can accumulate wan. And then they'll go and buy another little bean and they're starting to stash it, right? And so China, in terms of the population, China pop is becoming gold bugs, gold hoarders, and pretty soon they'll be using gold for transactions.

Actually, it's already happening now in an unofficial capacity. The scheme that is thought that China is working on is that it wouldn't be a gold back, it would not be convertible, so you wouldn't be able to take the fiat currency and convert it into gold, but there would be an official structure for gold used as currency. So they would be able to say to you, you'd be able to dial in, so to speak, the daily price in won or whatever currency of that little gold bean that you've bought. And so you'd be able to know in a relatively objective fashion, what it was worth in the economy in terms of its trading value for goods, right? Very much like the fiats that we have now, where they put so many fiat numbers on a price of a good in a store.

So here you would go on in and it would say, okay, these big bags of rice and all of this other stuff here would be equal to one gold bean. And so you would have it that way as opposed to having each item so they may be marked with their fractional cost in gold beans. Right. So I don't know how we're actually going to end up doing the signage aspect of the transformation to a hard money economy, but we're heading there now. Now this comes up for a lot of different reasons.

Right? So here's the thing we have now bull runs. So we have booms and busts in a fiat economy. It can only always be this way. You'll always have booms and busts within an economy that is based on fiat currency, which is printed for extremely low cost and then supposedly is valuable just because of its creation.

Now, what we're coming into is a hard money system. And you don't have speculative boom and bust cycles, because that's all it is. All right? So the boom and bust cycles are entirely emotional driven events. There's maybe a core of rationality at the beginning of it, like, oh, hey, look, this bitcoin stuff is pretty cool.

It can't be lost. I mean, you can lose it, you can lose the wallet, but I mean, it can't be stolen. It's on the blockchain, so you know that it's there. You can access it from all over the planet. These are good things to have.

There is only going to be 21 million of them. So it's a restricted supply, so it can't be inflated artificially, unlike ripple and all these other fuckers, the XRP and such. And so bitcoin is a good thing. So there is that understanding at a solid level that there is an objective reality to the operation and use of the bitcoin, right? And then thereafter, it's an emotional thing.

You get an emotional attachment to a particular view of the world unfolding around you, and you get an emotional attachment that says that, oh, as the fiat currency continues to inflate itself, continues to create more and more and more and more and more and more and more, then the bitcoin will be worth more in those digits. And if I need to convert to those digits, I will have shitloads of them, right? I'll just have buckets of the fuckers, which I don't have at the moment. The same thing is true with gold or silver. If you bought gold and silver.

And then we get into another one of these boom and bust cycles, this would happen as the currency hyperinflates itself, right? Which it is hyperinflating now, okay? So when Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971, there was not a billion dollars in circulation. So just think about that. There were no billionaires.

There were millionaires that had managed to accumulate wealth, but there were no billionaires. Then we get into 100% fiat currency in 1971, and now we're scaling to where our debt for the nation requires interest payments of a trillion dollars a year, okay? And it's scaling up two years from now. So the projection is that if at the end of the Biden regime here and swearing in of Trump in 2025, we would have close to a $2 trillion annual debt payment. And we can't make that.

We won't make it that far. Okay? So we're at the extreme limit of the ability of the system to hold itself together. That's why they're trying to get us into this central bank digital currency scheme where they think they've got the problems worked out in terms of how could they sustain it. Right?

I won't go into all of the reasons that they think they can sustain a CBDC where they can't sustain fiat currency. No, fiat currency has survived more than 75 years from its introduction. And no, the United States didn't have fiat currency until 1971, when it was no longer backed by anything because it had been backed by gold. If you were a foreigner, and I know american citizens that were outside the country, that participated in that through the banking arrangements that they had, where they were converting american dollars into gold in 1971, before they shut the window, these were the gold speculators that temporarily caused us to get off of the gold window. Yeah, a bunch of horseshit.

It's permanent. They've got to go fiat. It's the death of the fiat, blah, blah, blah. So here's the thing. We have had boom cycles in sound money economies, okay?

So we've had boom cycles when we were working on a gold and silver based sound money economy. Those boom cycles are not bull runs. Okay? So they're not an investment. Okay, let's be clear in the language then.

So when you have fiat currency, there's no such thing as investment. There's only speculation. So you're speculating that there will be an emotional response to a particular level of assets that will incentivize people with that emotional attachment to put their fiat currency into that asset, and it has no relation to the underlying value of that asset. In an overall general scheme, it is entirely an emotional response. That's why we get these huge bull runs that scale the way the fuck up and then crash.

Okay? It has to do with the amount of fiat currency available, how fast they're creating it, and where the emotions are running.

In a sound money economy, we have booms, but those booms occur because we have new sources of gold or something else that gooses the economy. And so if you had a gold based economy and you could go on out here in the west and go to a stream and pan gold, then you are basically converting your daily calories of energy into directly working for gold without doing it in a stepped fashion. So one guy might use his energy to go out and spend eight or 9 hours speculating that he can get gold out of a stream, whereas another guy said, that's too much risk or whatever. So I'm going to use my eight or 9 hours today, and I'm going to go and hammer nails in two x fours and get gold in exchange. Now, the amount of gold I'm going to get is fixed because it's being paid out on a per hour basis sort of thing.

Unlike the guy who goes and speculates by putting his feet in the stream and kicking up the dirt and then getting some and seeing if he's got any gold in it, right? Okay, so in a sound money economy, you can have booms. And this would be where a bunch of people go out and they discover a bunch of gold. And now you've got more money in circulation because they've introduced it by discovering it, right? And getting it in there.

It would be in a raw form. It would have costs to become a coin and become actual money. But those costs are trivial relative to the continual store of value that is represented by the gold. Now, the other form of things for booms we've seen, I think it was like in the 1870s. We'll take it up from the 1880s.

Okay, so from the 1880s, we had a couple of booms. These booms were related to gold supplies in the west, out here in Alaska and California, coming online and being mined and so on. Right? Now, in a sound money economy, you can have fantastic deflation, right? Because if we discovered a giant mountain of gold that you can just scrape two inches of dirt off the mountain and hack out a big chunk, then the amount of effort to get the gold relative to the rest of the currency deflates the purchasing power of the rest of that gold, just because there's so much of this shit.

So it's truly a supply and demand kind of a thing, right? It is scarcity that creates value under those circumstances. If gold is not scarce, then we're looking at an entirely different level of valuation for it. All right? Now, there are other things that will create booms in a sound money economy.

And some of them are like in the 1880s, we had an invention period where people were making inventions. Bear in mind, that was a couple of hundred years after the end of the Kali yuga. We're thinking better. We're getting more thoughts in our heads. We're able to speculate and put it all together.

So we started inventing shit. And so the all aluminum electric car was invented in 1889. It took them, I think, about 14 years to really start producing them. But nonetheless, we started having all of these inventions. And then along comes Henry Ford, and he invents on the process of inventing to create the assembly line, and that creates.

So all of these inventions introduced new sources of value into the sound money economy. And those new sources of value brought booms in that economy as we were able to do things. All of this is energy related people. So it was much better energy to be able to put a gallon of this fluid into your car and go 500 miles or on a tank than having to stoke your horse up with hay. Take the three days or four days to get the 500 miles, however much it would take, probably be more like ten or twelve, et cetera.

Right? So it was the ability to do things faster with less dense forms of energy that propels forward those booms. And then when Henry Ford came on, even though we were starting to work with a dual economy where we had a fiat in circulation, but we were still on sound money because the fiat could be converted at any bank. So if you had $20 in fiat, you could get a $20 gold piece anyway. So Ford creates the assembly line and all of that.

We have another boom period. And so it was that boom period, not so much the fiat currency, but that boom period that created the 1920s thing here in the US, because Ford was bringing on all of the manufacturing. We were industrializing at that stage and altering our lives through the use of energy. Now, bear in mind, we've always known about this. So in those 18 hundreds, in the 18 hundreds where you see the people that are on the trains just shooting the buffalo, right?

Just shooting buffalo out in the planes. Just shooting and shooting. They were paid to do that by the american government, because the american government wanted to deprive the millions of Indians of their source of energy. They got their energy out of the buffalo, not only eating the buffalo, not only the buffalo hides, but also the buffalo fat. And so that was the source of their energy in their economy.

We were using coal, okay? So a denser form of energy, and they wanted to take over the country and get rid of all the Indians. And so they killed, like, 1.5 million buffalo in extremely short period of time. Like, maybe it was just a year and totally collapsed the economy of the native tribes. And it started the long, great suffering for these people, right?

And a mass die off. Millions died. Millions died, maybe tens of millions. There's estimates that are just. There were people that were saying there were 60 million Native Americans on this continent when the white people came from Spain, right?

When the Christians showed up. So there were millions that died in this process. And it was ethnic cleansing, as are all immigrations, as are all invasions, and that's what's going on now is America is being ethnically cleansed, top to bottom at the instructions of the mother wefers. Now it's my. Okay, so getting back to the boom and bust stuff here.

So, in a sound money economy, you don't have bull runs and you don't have crashes, you don't have market crashes other than through speculation at any given time. Even in a sound money economy, you can get conditions that will cause a crash in a particular stock as it becomes understood that it's not really a sound investment, that it was all hype or whatever. Right?

But the thing is here that I have to pay attention to driving. Okay, so in the sound money economy, an investment is not a speculation. Yes. An individual is speculating that this particular company is going to be sound and will return his money with some level of profit, but there is no expectation under those circumstances of having the underlying asset, the share of stock, which they would print out the paper and say, you had this and so on. It was an actual legal contract, unlike now.

But the share of stock would not escalate in value simply because of printing of money, which is what's going on with our stock market now. There has to be someplace for this money to go. And so they shovel it into these fake assets, and the rehypothecation, et cetera, et cetera. The rehypothecation is where they sell the same share of stock to hundreds and hundreds, thousands of people because they know they're not all going to want, or they're hoping that they don't all want to sell it at the same time, and thus they're never going to get caught at this game. That's coming to a point here where they will get caught at it as we get into the crack up boom, because in the crack up boom, the price of all the asset, all the fake paper assets, all the fiat driven bull run stuff, will scale way the fuck up, and then everybody will try and get out at the same time, and nobody will be able to get out, and so no one will be able to recover.

Well, maybe the first few people that at that early part of that wave, they'll get some portion of their fiat return to them, but it'll still be fiat, and the fiat itself will be crashing at that point anyway. So in the sound economy, we have investments, not speculation. In fiat money, you have speculation. So there's no point really in looking for soundness in an underlying company or whatever that you might buy stock in during a fiat money time. Rather, you should be a much more effective personal strategy would be to try and suss out where the emotions are going on these stocks.

And that was my original goal back in 2000 when I'd come across this. I'd started working on it in the. Had my webbot stuff going, and I was actually looking for being able to trade, so to speak, to have an edge in trading where I would know where the emotions were going relative to speculations. And thus I could get there ahead of time and sell ahead of time. Right?

So I'd beat the hordes, and so I would accumulate just because of basically the inflation of the money, would inflate the relative value, the nominal notional value of the asset I am purchasing or the speculation I'm purchasing, because it's not an asset. I don't actually own a share of stock. If I buy that on Wall street, they will do everything they can to not ever send you a share of stock, try and convince you in any number of ways not to do that, because then it's outside their control, they can't resell it, blah, blah, blah. Anyway, so the.

The ability to make a profit in a sound money economy is entirely different than in a fiat economy. And so this is all brought to a head by my buddy Joe's dream, right? So Joe had the dream. The dream showed him that he's interpreted it this way. The dream showed him that at 38,000, he should sell off all of his cryptos, because there was going to be a giant crash in all assets, not just cryptos, but gold and silver, et cetera, shortly thereafter.

Now, he had his dream. He sold at 38,000, and he has had a crash. Okay? It was not the crash of the cryptos or any of that. It was not this huge, devastating crash where silver would go from whatever, currently at something around 20, down to $6 or eight.

I don't remember the actual particulars, but it was a big amount of fiat currency numbers relative to gold and silver. So they would drop to less than a quarter of their value, current notional value. And so, in my opinion, the only way that that can happen is that we revert to a sound money economy. And I could see silver costing $6 an ounce in a sound money economy, right, where the money was basically gold and silver, or was a basket of resources, but nonetheless, the money itself would be much more valuable than our current fiat under those circumstances. I can see Joe's prices, but here's the problem with that.

If that were to occur, then Joe's dream is useless. The reason it's useless is because it would do him no good to buy any of these assets at that point. Why buy silver at $6 and hoard it, or gold, for that matter, or bitcoin, on those kind of sound money economies, because there will be no speculative inflation of the numbers within those assets. So in a sound money economy, silver might stay $6, nominally $6, for fucking decades, as has happened in the past. So an ounce of gold was $20 here in the US long before the Fed came in.

So an ounce of gold was $20 basically from 1812 to 1912. And actually it was even more than that. I mean, it was down to 1920 when they started creeping up on the value of gold relative to the fiat. It took them a number of years to start fucking over the system. So during that 100 year period of time, there was maybe a three or 4% increase in the overall amount of money available due to new gold supplies.

Because bear in mind, you got to get people up there, you got to harvest the gold and all of this kind of stuff, so there's real energy put out for it. And so we had maybe over 100 years, three or 4% inflation. Totally. Maybe it's not even that big. I'd have to go and actually look at the numbers.

But that's what we can expect with a sound money economy. So why buy those assets at that kind of an economy? People will buy those simply because they're going to be all freaked out about the death of the fiat, and they'll remember the death of the fiat. They'll not only be freaked out about it, they'll be living with it for 30, 40 years as the ripples go through the social order. And so they'll want to hoard gold and silver, but it won't be appreciating in value, it'll just not be falling in value.

I got to chug some coffee here for the blood work.

It's not the best fluid for getting blood out of you, but it does give you a little bit of hydration. Anyway, I've got some water here and I'll chug some of that as I head in.

Anyway, in my sense, my understanding, Joe had a prophetic dream. It was accurate. We hit the 38,000 and damn, did he have a crash. Right? It was not the crash of the system.

And as I pointed out, I've been fighting with Joe for a long time because he's got, in my opinion, he's hardened an emotional attitude about his interpretation of the dream, not about the dream, which I don't disagree with him. Right? I don't disagree with him that the dream was prophetic. I'm just saying that his interpretation of it is really fucked and he's going to fuck himself over by selling and then not getting back in. So my expectation is that there's going to be a giant wealth transfer in the form of the failure of the fiat, and we'll go through the crack up boom.

And at that stage we might really see 100,000, 150,000, $200,000 bitcoin. It could scale to fantastically huge numbers, but it's the currency that's worthless, not the bitcoin being worth more. There is an emotional attachment to it. Yeah. More people would want it, so it would have some extra value that way, but it's really the deterioration of the currency that's driving it all.

And so in my way of thinking, Joe has got an attachment to the. He's fixated his emotions on his interpretation, not on the dream itself.

And so I think he'll be wrong. I'm hoping and I'm praying that he's wrong, okay. That there is no giant crash. And he should pray that as well, because if there was a giant crash, he wouldn't recover. He could buy all these assets he wanted, but they're not going back up because we would have swapped over to a sound money system in that process, and there wouldn't be this level of recovery.

There's going to be chaos. There's going to be some level of speculation in assets during this frothy period of time, but it'll all settle out and go back to the investment cycle. In the investment cycle, you choose, based on hard analysis of what a company is doing or what some kind of an asset is doing, and then you invest on that and your return comes from them actually performing. So you could pick a company that says, well, we've got a good flying car here, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, invest with us, and they could crap out because they could be a bunch of fucktards and not be doing the flying car thing well. Whereas some other car company could do a flying car thing well.

And if you invested in that, that company would be worth more because they would be on the invention edge. So now we're coming up in 2024 through to fuck, no. Maybe, who knows? Not even going to speculate on that. But for decades, we're coming up into a huge invention cycle that is going to just totally floor everybody.

Now, of course, now they're going to release a lot of the secret technology that's been reverse engineered from space aliens, blah, blah, blah. And so we're going to have all of that kind of stuff impacting us, and we will do it in a sound money economy. So it's going to be the best of all possible worlds.

It's going to be huge. The sound money economy itself, even if we didn't have the invention cycle, the sound money economy itself, is going to fuck over Joe's idea of speculative investment yielding results, okay? Because it's just not going to happen because we won't have the fiat and the underlying dynamic that causes speculation. Speculation. So there were speculative booms, and there are speculative booms in a sound money economy, right?

They're not bull runs and they're not crashes. We don't have those. But booms do occur, and then they gradually fade away in the process of those booms. So you could buy way back before we went 100% fiat, so before 1971. And really, I'm talking about in the early 19 hundreds up through, say, 1930s, if you bought into Henry Ford's operation, you would have been rewarded, even if we had never gone full fiat, simply because there was a demand for these machines that Ford's plants were producing.

And so the company was more valuable. They hired more employees, they had more of the species, the currency flowing through their hands, so they could get more of it to stick to them. And so that was how the mechanism worked. And you'd end up with more value because you had bought the stock at the appropriate time. But it was not due to a flood of speculators getting an emotional hard on about it later.

It was people that were hard headed analysts that are saying, yeah, these cars sell. This company has got a good management program, yada, yada, yada. And so we get into return on investment. So in a sound money economy, you have return on investment. Here we have return on speculation.

And that's all it is, is to be able to emotionally front run this. And we can see how powerful these emotions are. And once one of these emotions sticks in your head, it's really difficult to get it shed right. And so this is basically, we're coming up to a period of time here in this year in which we will see one of these scenarios go forward. Either Joe's mega crash will happen, and hundreds, perhaps billions of people will die.

Okay? So bear in mind, if Joe's crash were to happen and we had $6 silver and we had all the cryptos crash, and he's talking about, I don't know what it would be but maybe bitcoin comes down to a couple of thousand or 600 or something like that. I don't remember the numbers that he had said in his dream. Right. Just that everything was way the fuck down at that level of about $6 silver.

Taking that as our metric and using today's fiat prices and just assuming that we're staying in fiat, okay, just assuming that we don't go to a sound money currency as a result of the crash or in the process of the crash, but we were theoretically going to recover in fiat currency. Still, still use the fiat fern dollar, if that were the case, then at that level, $6 silver, we're looking at less than $30 for a barrel of oil. And nobody makes money at $30 for a barrel of oil, and they won't even bother. So it costs us a dollar per 40 gallon barrel to lift oil out of the ground in Saudi Arabia, which has one of the cheapest lift costs anywhere on the planet. Then it costs us $4 a barrel to deliver that 40 gallon barrel anywhere else around the planet, right.

Just the transport costs. And so we've got $5 involved in there. Refining costs, et cetera, et cetera. And the handling of the, what do they call it? The inline transport to the ships.

From the ships to tanker trucks. From tanker trucks. The investment in that infrastructure eats up a bunch of money. So at about $30 a barrel, if we had a sound money economy, you could still maybe get people to do oil, right, to go and do all of the oil. But in a fiat economy, they're not going to bother because they can't make more fiat doing it.

They can't recover their costs. So instantly, everybody would stop producing oil. There would be no more goods shipment. All of the grocery stores would dry up. You wouldn't have any gas refined or diesel refined unless it was done at the point of a gun, basically being mandated by the government with military behind it saying, get that refinery working, get those trucks filled, get them out there to the gas stations, right?

Because there would be no economic incentive to do it, so they'd have to do it some other way. So you're talking about a really mad max kind of a situation relative to the prices that Joe's talking about in his dream. So I'm going to barely make it in time here anyway. So under those circumstances, billions of people would die because there wouldn't be any food shipments and there wouldn't be medicine, and we'd see all the children and all the at risk people would die really quick because there would be absolutely no fucking support, right? No one would go and take care of the elderly because they weren't being paid for it and there was no food there to feed them.

And the elderly are pain in the ass in the nursing homes anyway, and there wouldn't be medicines for them and everybody would be suffering greatly. And so this is the vision that would be produced should we have a situation of the prices that Joe's talking about in this crash. So I hope he's not right, because I don't want to die in that kind of a world. I don't want to go into that kind of a mad Max world. It's bad enough with what we got now we're at this period of time and all this shit's coming unglued, and you can really see where people's minds are and who's controlled and all of this sort of thing if you really look at it.

Anyway, so our situation here this year, I think, will mark this transition. How many years the transition will take, I don't know. It's just going to depend on how long it takes to start actually creating a sound money economy. Once we start creating that and speculation disappears, or it'll take maybe a year for speculation to go away just because we've been habituated to it emotionally for all these.

So basically that's my problem with Joe's vision, is that it kills us all off. And even he does not under. I don't think he grasps that. If his vision is accurate, if his interpretation is accurate, and there is going to be this giant crash of assets there, that if that is the case, then he's in a world of hurt. He's fucked over as well.

So like I say, I just don't think he grasped that. People don't understand. Well, he's a kid, he's under 50, so nobody's ever lived in a hard money economy. I actually have, because we spent time, because in Europe we'd go travel around to various different countries that were hard money economies at those times with communism and so on. Anyway, guys, I got to go and do this, so I will pick this up later.

View me!

SciFi World – 01-03-2023

SciFi World - 01-03-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The PDF document titled "SciFi World" by Clif High, published on January 3, 2024, provides a comprehensive perspective on the author's vision of a future dominated by the decline of current societal structures and the emergence of a new era characterized by hyper novelty and the end of authoritative control. The author critiques the American empire's trajectory, likening its rise and fall to the British Empire, and points out the failures of the Federal Reserve and fiat currency system, which he claims are leading to the death of the American empire. As the fiat currency fails and people struggle to meet basic needs, he anticipates a societal upheaval and a revolutionary shift towards a new way of living and thinking, free from the constraints of the current financial and political systems. This shift is described as moving into a "Sci-Fi world," where hyper novelty allows for continuous and unrestricted innovation and transformation. The author predicts that this transition period will be tumultuous and chaotic but ultimately lead to a more positive future with sound money, real investment, and a flourish of new inventions and technologies.

#SciFiWorld #ClifHigh #AmericanEmpire #FiatCurrency #HyperNovelty #Innovation #SocietalShift #Revolution #CentralBanks #FederalReserve #CurrencyFailure #Inflation #NewEra #SoundMoney #Investment #AuthorityCollapse #TechnologicalBoom #FuturePredictions #PoliticalChange #EconomicReform #Disruption #Chaos #Transformation #Survival #RevolutionaryThinking #CryptoFuture #Decentralization #Empowerment #GrassrootsMovement #FinancialFreedom #SocialOrder #NormieReactions #AuthorityDeath #VisionaryInsight #GlobalChange

Key Takeaways:

The decline of the American empire and fiat currency system is imminent.
A new era of hyper novelty will emerge, characterized by unrestricted innovation and transformation.
The transition period will be tumultuous and chaotic but ultimately lead to a more positive future with sound money and real investment.
Societal upheaval and revolution are anticipated as people struggle to meet basic needs due to the failing currency.
The author envisions a flourishing of new inventions and technologies in this new era.

Predictions:

The American empire will collapse due to the failures of the fiat currency system.
A societal shift towards a new way of living and thinking, free from the constraints of current financial and political systems, will occur.
Sound money and real investment will replace speculative money placement.
A period of vast numbers of new inventions and technological advancements will emerge.
The transition will be recognized by even those who are currently oblivious to the changing times.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

SciFi World - 01-03-2023

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. Damn, it's noon. Long day.

Heading outbound now. Got all my chores done, met with everybody, did all of the necessary stuff, and heading out to do more damn work. Got people meeting me in about an hour or so at my place to talk about the extension I'm putting on and the work I need to get done there anyway, though, so I wanted to talk for a few minutes about Sci-Fi world, and really, it's the death of the american empire. Most kids don't know it, but America was never supposed to be an empire, right? We rebelled against the british empire and came on over here because we didn't want anything to do with their way of organizing things.

And then we end up replicating them. They infiltrated us in the 18 hundreds. They tried to put in two central banks. We threw those out. And then eventually they were able to work their way in and put in another central bank and seize control.

In 1913, it actually started. In the 1890s, they started a big push for the blackmail and the murder and this kind of thing. It's amazing how many people have been murdered in order to bring in the Federal reserve. Not merely the people that were killed on the Titanic, but a long string of people that were standing in their way, starting about. Actually, it was like, I think one of the first that I've identified is in, like, 1889, this particular banker in New York that was making waves about no central bank.

Anyway, so as we move into Sci-Fi world, we will also. Okay, so how do I say? Okay, so we're going to experience, and we're experiencing it right now, the death of authority. And this is also coincident with the death of the american empire, which is based on the fiat currency of the Federal Reserve bank, which is not part of the federal government, has no reserves, and is not a bank. It's simply a money laundering creation machine.

Anyway, so the death of the american empire is in the core. It's happening because of the death of the currency, because the currency can't be extended any longer because it has no purchasing power. And this is rapidly becoming evident. People are starving, even though they're working. They're not able to pay for housing, this kind of thing.

So we know that the currency is failing. It actually truly is no longer working for people. In 1913, when they first brought it out, almost everybody ignored it. Hardly anybody used it. In 1913, a family of four could have all of their expenses covered by a dollar a day in terms of earned income.

So if you earned $30 a month, you could support yourself you could support your wife and you could support two kids. Not a bad deal, right?

That was basically the prevailing wage for any kind of skilled work other than like, farm labor, right? Because it was a different category. We were still 80% agricultural at that stage in the 18 hundreds. But by the time we get into the 19 hundreds, we're looking at basically a dollar a day in a gold based economy as being a living wage. And it was generally paid.

We had plenty of gold, everything was circulating just fine. And then the Elohim worship cult gets their bank in, and now we're all fucked, right? And so now it's actually reached the point where you can't survive on your retirement that you worked all your life for. If you're on only a government retirement program, it just is not going to be working for you. You won't be able to get health care, you won't be able to afford housing.

And pretty soon it'll get to the point where even with all your other expenses, if you pay none of your bills, you still won't be able to afford food. And that period is going to be very brief. Okay? So we're not talking years for that.

The whole social order would be in upheaval if that tried to continue for years because basically everybody was starving. And so, believe me, if we had no food here and the situation was that dire and stuff, I will use my last of my resources to go and raise an army and stage a revolution here in Washington state. The rest of y'all can go fuck yourselves. You got to work out your own issues, right? But in Washington state, if we have that dire situation where people are starving because the food system's broken down and there is no political will to change the, you know, the Democrats are still in charge, yada, yada, yada, then it's like, okay, dudes, it's pirate know, revolution is, you know, a bunch of old men.

Because I would just go and tell everybody I was going to go and take my arms. I'm not going to hide it. I'm coming into Olympia to clear the place out and take it over, right? Redo restart. So that would be the approach I would take under those circumstances.

Not going to happen the way that our financial system is structured. There are so many politicians that are so fucking freaked out because they know that we can all identify them. You can look on the phone, get their picture, et cetera, et cetera. And we'd go and track them all down and hang them, and then we'd set about fixing things up again. Anyway, though, so a couple of OD little notes.

One of my stalkers has a phone with my picture on it that he did not put on there, and also has pictures of JC and a bunch of people that I don't know. Are they all part of a gang stalking or is there some kind of like organized effort here to rattle our cage, give us some shit? Sure looks that way. Anyway, though. So Sci-Fi world is going to emerge out of hypernovelty.

We're in hyper novelty now as authority fades. What makes it hyper novelty is that there will be new shit everywhere, constantly, continuously, because there will be no authorities left to say that a, that's not true, or that's a bogus thought. There won't be any constraints on our ability to examine data in terms of history and all of this kind of shit, unlike now, right? So if you get into too much history now, they're going to come and say, no, you're wrong, this didn't exist, this didn't happen. People will give you blowback for it, right?

That's going to fall away. A lot of the people that are doing that are paid shills. They're very stupid, low intelligence people. They don't have much on the go mentally, and they're simply being paid to be an academic parrot, to hold the line, prevent disinformation, this kind of stuff, right? Oh, you can't weaponize history against us, blah, blah, blah.

In spite of the fact that they have indeed weaponized history with all of the critical race theory and all of that kind of shit. All that crap's going to fall away this year. It'll be very dramatic, I think, from the end of January onward, but certainly from the third week in February, we're going to get into some serious level of social disruptions that will run across the entire nation. Okay? So this may also be participating during that period of time.

We may be having a situation where we have the markets going crazy. Okay? They're not going to crash at that point. That's probably a little too early. Maybe we might see some initial phase of a stock market crash around the 18 February, but the Fed and everybody will still be pumping their fake dollars like mad.

So it's going to be difficult to see that we're going to have a price crash relative to stocks. And that's what everybody is looking at for, oh, our economy is good because our stock market's up. It's like horseshit. Stock market is all rehypothecation, Ponzi scheme shit anyway. As we will discover, because we're going to run into this crack up boom.

In the crack up boom, we can expect the Fed to shovel all kinds of money through all kinds of their fiat, through every possible outlet into stock market and trying to get it into people's hands to spend as the velocity of the spending drops, which it's already happening. I've been talking with merchants all day today. Out in the wild here, we are certainly seeing all the signs of depression, right? Especially in terms of money velocity through the system, through the locals'hands out here.

This gets so complicated, guys.

All right, so we're going to get a crack up boom. They're going to shovel money like Matt into the stock market. The bidenistas will be saying, hey, look, it's a good economy. Look, look, the stock market's up. The people won't be buying it.

And at some point here, and we're very rapidly approaching it, we're going to have this net negative return in the sense that, like I was saying, you could work and you could get an income, but it wouldn't be sufficient to pay housing and food and transportation, right? And so to say nothing of health care and this kind of thing. So the failure of the money is making the social order fail all around us. So you know that when you know your money is failing, when a class of drugs that a person uses for, like, kidney treatment, and they've been paying this for years because they'd had dialysis and all this kind of shit, all of a sudden doubles and it doubled in one month. So this guy I was talking to today, while I was waiting on some service today, had a situation four months ago where a particular drug he was taking, and he said it wouldn't mean anything to me, used to cost him $7,000 a month, and now it's gone to almost 15,000 a month.

So I think the big pharma industry is trying to play catch up or get ahead relative to the death of the currency anyway, though. So as the currency dies in this period of hyper novelty, we're going to have a reaction seen in the social order that will reflect back on itself. So, in other words, we'll have a situation where people won't be able to make a living on the wages. And so, like I was saying in the previous talk, so anybody with student debt, the first thing that we can expect that will happen is they won't pay those debts anymore. They won't pay interest on that debt.

They won't even deal with it. Pretty soon, you're going to have this so egregiously in our face that the banks are going to say relative to like student loans, they'll start saying, oh, don't worry, you don't have to pay it back, just pay the interest. If you just pay the interest, you're good. And it's like that's the very last phase of the banks being able to get enough money to flow through their system in a total loop in order for the bank to be active, not even solvent, just be able to open the fucking doors. And I suspect that's a couple of months away.

I don't know how. Wow. Eagle right over my head here. Big guy too. He's probably been fishing in the river here anyway, so the crap, somehow I'd nicked myself and started it bleeding again anyway though.

So the social order here, getting a paper towel and we're good. The social order is going to be evolving, okay? So it's going to evolve out of this state of disrepair, dysfunction, all of that, and will gradually start fixing things, changing things, heading. And it'll be fairly dramatic because at the moment those people that want to correct the societal's ills are being stymied, blocked by people that want to continue on in this communist effort, and they're anti humanity and want to kill a bunch of people. And yada yada yada, we don't know why the hell they think that way.

But they're part of the Elohim worship cult. They may be blood drinkers, who the fuck knows? Anyway, they're out there using money to try and prevent people from fixing the problems that they engineered. And so that's our structure at the moment. Well, as the money dies, a lot of the foot soldiers for the side that want to break everything down, a lot of the foot soldiers there are not going to be paid and they won't be available to participate.

So I expect that they'll call a BLM riot and nobody is going to show up much because they're not getting paid anything to make it worthwhile. And it's getting a little hinky out there with the evil white race all getting guns and being very touchy about being genocided. Okay? And so this is also the problem for the Elohim worship cult is that they're writing a very fine line. So they're trying to skate along on this fine line.

If they go to either side of it, they're fucked. And one of the sides they have to go towards is the destruction of the banking system. But they've got to do it in such a way that they don't pull the rug out from the whole system too rapidly, because then all social order would fail and a lot of us would just take up arms and as I say, we would go and have the political will in the form of a revolution to change things. And in the process of changing things in that period of disruption and chaos, a lot of the Elohim worship people will simply be killed just to remove them. I'm not talking genocide or anything like that.

I'm talking about people that are, you know, Federal Reserve board member Kapow. That's it. We don't have to worry about you anymore, right? Let's just get rid of the Federal Reserve by killing them all, that kind of thing, right? That will occur, especially if it goes too rapidly.

Things break out too fast anyway. So Sci-Fi World is going to come out of the hyper novelty that is resulting now from the bad guys trying to deliberately destroy the social system in order to engineer the new financial system, which is the central bank digital currency that's intended to enslave the whole planet.

So Sci-Fi world will begin, I think, to our site. We'll be able to see the emergence of some aspects of ScI-Fi World this year, probably the very last quarter, right? The very last few months of this year. We'll get some hints of how Sci-Fi world will start emerging, start manifesting. But it's going to be a period of vast numbers of new inventions coming out, new stuff happening.

A lot of people will get, okay, so as part of this, I suspect that we will go back to a sound money situation and then we'll go back to real investment as opposed to speculative money placement. Right. And so as we get into this, we'll have a sound money, we'll get into investment. Investments will start investors, people with excess money that were able to be smart and preserve wealth through this transformation will then start trying to put their money to work in various different industries. And so we'll have inventions happening all over the place that will then go through the various generations of improving the tech and so on.

And those people that invest in those companies will get a return on their money as well as the appreciation of the assets that they've nominally purchased. So I'm looking into some companies that use electricity in novel ways and going to decide at some point to invest some money in those companies.

At this point, it seems very wise to follow that course of action. So I found one I'm dealing with it now they're on generation two of their product, which it's like. The generation two is a little wimpy, but I can see the technical problems for generation three and four. And by generation four, it will surpass the tool it's intended to replace. Okay?

So right now it's in competition and doing very poorly because of the nature of the electrically driven process that this tool uses. So I'm not talking like electric cars or anything like that, right. Anyway, though at that point, I can see I'm going to play around. I bought one of their units, I'm going to play around with it and see if I actually can't make some inventions off of it and get in on the invention cycle of the whole thing, right. But also, if I just use the product and stay abreast of this particular company, then I can buy generation three and generation four, which are things I want anyway.

I mean, the tool itself is something I want anyway. I'm not being mysterious. I just don't want people going and trying to buy this. You got to be really sophisticated, knowing what you're doing here, and be willing to take massive risks with your personal capital. So I'm not going to say anything at this point until we reach a certain point.

Then I'll tell people, oh, yeah, I'm invested in this, and I'm thinking of investing in this and so on. Not that I'm going to be good at that, right? I mean, I think I might be good at that in an investment environment, but I'm certainly not good at it in a speculation environment. Speculation drives me crazy. My buddy Joe, he trades stuff and it's like, fuck, if I did that, I'd have so much anxiety, I'd give myself.

What are those things? Panic attacks. Right. So anyway, so it's just not something I'm constitutionally built to do. However, an investment where I just put some money in and track the company over time.

Like, hey, no worries, guy, I like this technology, blah, blah, blah. Anyway, so we're coming into Sci-Fi world, emerging this year out of the chaos of this year of transition, and it'll probably be more like 1819 months, and then we'll be sort of solidly into Sci-Fi world, and there will be a recognization that we're not going back. Right. You'll be able to see that we're not going to be repeating the old mistakes, that things truly have changed. And this for even the regular normies.

And I talk to normies all the time. I push them a little bit disturb their mind, see what happens, see how they react. Was doing some of that today with some guys that have had the jab and are totally normies and have no idea what they're facing. Although I got to say that they were all worried, so they've all heard enough to be worried, and I'm telling them things to do, but they're not yet worried enough that they're going to try and do that. They're still captured mentally by the authority of the medical system.

But believe me, when we yank the mrna and when the big pharma crashes, so we lose that level of authority for, quote, medicines, these chemicals that they crank out, that's going to be a huge tranche of people that will just say, holy shit, and they'll move over into hyper novelty here. They'll say, no fucking authority is going to tell me what to do. Because there is no authority, right? There is no ultimate authority on all of this. And also, by the way, this whole period of time is going to bring out the breakdown of authority in religion, regardless of anything I do.

I could have kept my mouth shut and we would still be here, people talking about the elohim, we would still be facing the Elohim coming back, and all of the things that we're still facing. I thought to get a jump on it, right? To get those people that can think about it ahead of time, thinking about it, so they don't have to stop and go through this process. When we're dealing with the Elohim themselves, it's just better to have plans and have your mind free because you recognize some of the shit that's actually going on anyway. So the last quarter, this year, I expect to see some pretty significant changes that will indicate that we're really seriously shifting over into Sci-Fi world.

And in the meantime, it's going to be ugly and dirty and massively chaotic, and all kinds of shit's going to happen. But it's like, well, it all has to happen, it's all going to be good for us. Even though at the moment it doesn't feel good, right? It's kind of like you don't want to really sit there and suture the wound in your leg. You know that every time you put that needle in there and thread it through and bring those two parts of the wound together, that that's going to hurt and it's already hurting, and you're going to keep adding to the hurt through the whole process.

But you do know that the minute you get to that last suture, then that phase is done. And eventually the hurt will go away and everything will heal up. And that's really where we are. Where we are. People are just reluctant to take the needle and jab it into their leg on one side of the wound.

And pull it through to the other side of the wound. And then come back with the line and tie it up and start closing up the wounds. Right. A lot of people don't even see we're wounded. So anyway, the current thinking for us now is last week in January is going to begin a bunch of chaos.

February 18 and onward is going to magnify that chaos. And I suspect that in the February the 18th, I'm suspecting I don't have any for sure kind of indicators that I would really have a lot of confidence in. But I suspect that there's a high probability that that will be the period of time for the rest of our release language. That had been forecast back last July and August. We still have yet to complete a lot of that.

The reason I suspect that this is probably going to happen and may happen on. Okay, so I got a lot of probabilities that it will happen. And I suspect that it will happen in February. Because of the building tension values now. And the way they're growing.

And the type of language that we're getting building tension on. And I won't go into details. I'm almost back at the place here, and I've got stuff I've got to do.

So third week in January. Last week in January, 18 February. I'm saying that we'll get a big hit on hyper novelty in the first week. Oh, that was my guy. He was supposed to be here.

He was here early. Oh, well, shit. Anyway, so he wasn't supposed to be here till after one. Maybe he'll come back.

Anyway, so April 3, we should have for all of us guys, people that listen to me, that really going out and pay attention. As opposed to the people that listen and say, oh, that old fucker don't know shit. So April 3 is where I'm suspecting that the Wu people will be able to say, yeah, hyper novelty is here. Authority is dying right and left. And it's increasing.

And the rate of increase itself is increasing. So we'll start getting into the snowball effect. Right where you're rolling down the hill and you're going at a pretty fast clip. And then you notice that the speed at which you are rotating. In terms of spinning around and going down that hill is increasing.

And so it all becomes this, as I say, a snowball effect. And I'm expecting that to pick up in April and to continue. And it'll really hit the normies in the first part of June, maybe the middle of June, something like that. And then we'll start having Normie freakouts. Normie freakouts are going to participate in our hyper novelty.

So that's going to be the increase of the increase, so to speak. Right? Then it'll start reflecting back and it'll get really chaotic through the summer. Anyway, guys, I got to go and do stuff. I'll get into more of this stuff later.

There's so much more. We've got lots of detail in some of the data sets now as to how some of it's going to peel off, but basically, um, it's the buckle up buttercup time, you know, it's here now. Okay, gotta get moving. Talk to you all later.

View me!

Crack Up Boom JUST AHEAD In 2024 – 2023-12-20

Crack Up Boom JUST AHEAD In 2024 - 2023-12-20

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The document, authored by Clif High and titled "Crack Up Boom JUST AHEAD In 2024," is a complex and speculative dialogue about the impending financial and societal changes expected in the upcoming year, specifically the phenomenon known as the "crack up boom." High engages in a meandering discourse that covers a range of topics including prophetic dreams, the nature of fiat currencies, central banking failures, and the eventual collapse of both capitalist and communist systems.

High begins with a personal anecdote, discussing his conversations and interactions, which leads into a broader discussion about the validity and interpretation of prophetic dreams. He does not dismiss dreams as a source of prophecy entirely but emphasizes the need for a rigorous and systematic approach to discerning the truly prophetic ones.

The core of the document revolves around the concept of the "crack up boom," a term attributed to economist Kondratief, who was asked by Stalin to predict the downfall of capitalism. Kondratief's theory posits that the inherent nature of central banks and the human element within them will inevitably lead to a catastrophic financial boom and bust cycle. High explains that this cycle is fueled by the continued and accelerated printing of fiat currency, leading to hyperinflation and a loss of confidence in the monetary system. This situation is exacerbated by the inability of banks to induce or manage debt effectively, leading to a systemic collapse.

High interweaves historical examples, personal observations, and anecdotal evidence to argue that the current state of the global economy is teetering on the edge of this "crack up boom." He suggests that various signals, such as difficulty in obtaining goods, the rise of digital currency, and the overall instability of the fiat system, are indicators of the impending crisis. He also touches upon the potential impacts on different sectors, including real estate and resource properties, and the societal shifts that might result from a financial system collapse.

Throughout the document, High maintains a critical view of central banking and fiat currency, advocating for a return to a more stable and sustainable economic model. He peppers his narrative with personal insights and predictions about specific dates and events that he believes will mark key turning points in the impending crisis.

#CrackUpBoom #ClifHigh #2024Forecast #February18th #FiatCurrency #Hyperinflation #EconomicCollapse #CentralBanking #Kondratief #PropheticDreams #CapitalismFail #CommunismFail #MonetarySystem #Inflation #Deflation #BankFailures #RealEstate #ResourceProperties #DigitalCurrency #DebtCrisis #EconomicTheory #StalinEra #FiatFail #GoldStandard #SilverLining #EconomicPredictions #FinancialCrisis #StockMarket #HyperNovelty #InvestmentStrategy #LoanDefaults #ConsumerConfidence #FinancialForecast #ElohimCult #PropheticInterpretation #SocietalShifts

Key Takeaways:

Major Economic Event centered on February 18th, 2024 (+/- 3 Days), which will lead to hyper-inflation by May
The "crack up boom" predicts a catastrophic financial cycle leading to hyperinflation and economic collapse.
Kondratief's theory suggests that the nature of central banks and fiat currency will inevitably lead to this collapse.
High emphasizes the need for critical analysis of prophetic dreams as a tool for predicting future events.
The current global economy shows signs of impending crisis, with difficulties in debt management, goods acquisition, and consumer confidence.
High advocates for a return to hard species like gold and silver to stabilize the economy.

Key Takeaways:

A "crack up boom" will lead to the collapse of fiat currencies and central banking systems around 2024.
Specific economic markers, such as hyperinflation, will become evident around February 18, with significant shifts by May.
The government and societal structures may begin to collapse by October or November post hyperinflation.
A move towards digital currency and a need for a more sustainable economic model will emerge from the crisis.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Crack Up Boom JUST AHEAD In 2024 - 2023-12-20

Hello, humans. Hello humans. Long day afternoon here.

Anyway, so still heading back out now. Heading back out to the coast. I was talking to some guys about. I got delayed in actually quite interesting discussion about computer programming and what's going on and so forth. But that doesn't interest most people.

But it was kind of interesting for myself. I was talking to a guy who is a retired navy commander and had served on intelligence gathering boats. Well, like the liberty that was attacked and almost sunk by the Israelis. Dirty, fucking evil Israelis. Anyway, so he's on a liberty style boat and he was just saying in 30 day period of time, he didn't say where any of the details.

They had over 200 UAP incidents out and about somewhere, wherever the hell he was. So very interesting, that kind of stuff happening all over.

So Carrie Cassidy is bitching and moaning at me that she's misunderstood, thinking that I don't accept dreams as prophetic, which I do. I just don't accept all dreams as being prophetic, and most are not. And so that's where it comes down to it. It's a thing of, yeah, she's probably had a prophetic dream. Probably nearly everybody does.

But just because you have such a dream and connect it to the unfolding common reality around us one time doesn't mean that all your dreams are thereafter are prophetic or that necessarily any of them are. And if you have a mechanism and so on, and you can say, well, I've used this mechanism and I've had 35 prophetic dreams and I've been able to track 34 of them by using this method. It's like, well, okay, then the next time you have a dream, then you've got a track record, you've got a rigor, an analysis approach to determine which dreams are prophetic. And so, all right, so I'll go with you on that. Right.

It's likely that you've got something going on there and you may be able to clue into it. Not everybody is or does or can. It's just like dreams are on a low order of prophetic kind of approach for me. There's easier ways to collapse the matrix potential and determine what the hell is going on than trying to rely on dreams which then also have that huge interpretation thing going on. Right.

You've got to interpret the dream relative to itself, to temporal clues, all different kinds of stuff. And so it gets really difficult, to say the least, to make any kind of appropriate conclusion on it. Right. Anyway, so, no, I'm not saying that dreams are not prophetic. I'm just saying that it's a real crapshoot when you're trying to do these ahead.

So I agree that prophetic dreams exist and you can track them and plot them against manifesting circumstances, but usually 99.99% of the time, that's only done in hindsight. Only looking back after the events have emerged, do you see how the dream was accurate and so on? So I actually think my buddy Joe had a dream in which it basically told him that bitcoin was going to hit 38,000. He sold then, because the dream had a big giant ice cream cone, and then there was this crash business. Right?

So he's interpreted as a big crash. Well, bitcoin hit 38,000, he sold out, and then he crashed his airplane. So does that complete the prophetic dream, or does his interpretation that there's a crash coming to the cryptos and so forth make any sense? Was that part of the dream? Well, it's like, I don't know.

I think if I were him, I would say, oh, I crashed. And so I probably misinterpreted the dream, and there's probably not going to be any kind of a crypto crash relative to what I had seen, because it sure doesn't look that way. It looks like we're going to head into the crack up boom. The crack up boom was okay. So Stalin had this brilliant economist by the name of Kondratiev, and Kondratiev was real brilliant.

And Stalin goes to him and says, I want to know when capitalism will collapse. And Kondratiev said, sure, no worries. And he goes and he works and he works and he works and he has math, and he works some more. And some months, a year later, he goes back to Stalin and he says, okay, I've got it here. Right?

Here's the deal. Capitalism will collapse at this point, and it will happen this way. And the way it'll happen is a crack up boom. And that this is inevitable simply because of the nature of central banks and humans. Okay?

And that this is all good. Capitalism is going to collapse at this point. But, Mr. Stalin, I got a little bit of bad news, and that is that communism's going to collapse a lot quicker. It'll collapse long before capitalism.

And so Stalin says, I didn't want to hear that and ships Kondratiev off to the gulag for giving him bad news, right? So you got to watch out for these guys. Stalin, by the way, was a khazarian. He's jewish, and he was deeply connected to the Elohim worship cult, in spite of the fact that he know, nominally communist and an atheist.

So I don't know how this shit works out. But anyway, so Kondratiev comes up to him in that process of telling Stalin all of this, and he tells him how it's going to go down. And it's perfectly logical. It makes perfect sense. We've seen us come close to it a couple of times.

But basically what happens is all fiat currencies will go through this. We see this happening where there have been central banks, like in Argentina and so on, that have followed this exactly. And so Kondratiev is correct in how fiat currencies die. And what happens is that your central bank being controlled by humans, all of these humans have incentives to keep their position, and they have incentives to keep the system going the way it is. And so they will be counted upon to keep on keeping it on.

And so that's number one to bear in mind is that this will all be run out, directed, controlled by human emotion at all the various different levels. That's one level of human emotion is that the central bank will not just simply cease, they will keep on at the way that they are keeping on now until they can't do it anymore. And so this ultimately leads to a state of acceleration of what they're doing. Okay, so it's not working, but they think if they do it more fiercer, faster, it will work. That's their inherent delusional, supported by emotion viewpoint on what's happening.

They don't know it's dying. I mean, they do know it's dying, but they think, oh, well, we can stop this if only we do this. If only we do this. And so we will have a crack up boom in our fiat based capitalistic structure. Capitalism is great.

It's the only workable economic system, right? Socialism doesn't work. Communism doesn't work. Both socialism and communism are jewish constructs made from the Elohim worship cult. Anyway, so what happens is that we get to the point where we're at right now, where the banks are suddenly finding it difficult to get people to take on debt.

Debt is the propellant. It is the fuel for a fiat money system. If you don't have increasing levels of debt, doesn't have to increase much, but it has to increase pretty continuously. But if you don't have that, you start sliding back into a period where the banks can't have it, okay? And that's deflation.

If you start paying off the loans, and if you start deflating the currency, deflating the debt that is around a fiat currency. Then you get to the point where the banks collapse faster, harder, the whole thing just really crumbles. And so the central banks are desperate to not ever have deflation. So we had deflation in 1932. Prices were falling.

So prices in the depression fell down to a certain level that made sense relative to the individual items. And then as we get into this, in like 1929 30, 31, then as we get into 1932, the lack of demand is such that you have goods start piling up all over that no one wants to buy. And so they will start the process of deflation. The people that have money invested in those goods will deflate by lowering the prices on those goods just to get them out the store and get a little bit of currency because they're like everybody else. They need that currency to flow through them in order to be able to pay their bills, et cetera.

We're actually encountering this situation now. I have run into this myself, and I've talked to a guy today who was telling me about also running into it himself in another store. So we're running into the period of time where there are goods that are in short supply you can't find. So I'm especially running into this, starting to get into buying the stuff I'm going to need for the extension on my house, right? There's a lot of material that I'm going to have a hard time locating because the supplies are not readily available for a number of different reasons.

All coming down to basically though, that the money is just shit anyway. So I go to some of these places that have these kind of goods that are smaller. They're not like giant regional chains and stuff, right? And I go on in there and they're in a situation where in these past five or six years they bought a lot of items for sale in their stores and the items are not selling, okay? They've got goods that are sitting on the shelf for over a year now, and that costs them serious money because basically a lot of it is they're getting the stock on debt.

They're taking out operating loans to buy stock in order to get the stock to then be able to sell to people and to make a profit to pay back the loan, et cetera, et cetera. So even the store owners don't have their own capital at risk. They have the bank's money at risk in this, and they're not moving money fast enough. And so as far as a bank is concerned, they can make money off of a business going broke and collapsing. But only in a healthy business environment can they do that.

If all the businesses are crashing, they're not able to make money on the dissolution of a business. And so even the banks aren't making money now with the state of the local businesses. So now my businesses that I deal with, some of them are starting to have to discount prices on goods that were purchased a while back just to be able to get them off the shelf because they're not selling. And those things that do sell, they have to replace, but they don't have the cash to buy a new item to replace the one that just sold. And if they use their cash to do that, then they can't pay their employees, and they're not able to get as easily, not able to get bank loans to buy stock in order to move it through their store because they've already got a bank loan, and it's on stock that is not moving because the economy has turned around to a negative state and the flow is not in their favor, so to speak.

Right. So it's a real mess. So they need to get rid of this shit that doesn't sell. They need to buy new stuff to replace the items that have sold that they know will sell because there's a demand for them. But they're hamstrung by the debt structure in getting those goods on the shelf and getting the non selling stuff off of their shelves.

And so they're basically going broke really slowly. And it's agony to watch this. A lot of these guys don't have the big enough picture view to understand what's happening to their particular environment and their store and its causes at the larger social level, with the central bank now running into this particular situation. So getting back to Kondrativ, Kondrativ said that we would reach a point that capitalism would reach a point under central banks. Now, capitalism being run on a constitutional money is entirely different, okay?

This is only capitalism as it's structured on fiat currency. That's what Kandrativ said. He said, basically, if capitalism had sound money, if it dealt only in silver and gold, hard species, he called it, it would never collapse because it's the most fundamental economic system on the planet. But based on fiat, it's going to go through this thing that he called the crack up boom. And we're very close to that.

This is why I was thinking Bo Polney is making. He's okay. Anyway, let me tell you about the crack up boom first. Okay, so the crack up boom is a period of time which the central banks are in now where they will do everything they can to accelerate the process of inflation into their money because they're going to be running into deflation as lots of businesses collapse. Lots of loans are paid off or they've just abandoned.

And so the bank has to eat the loan and so on and so on and so on. Right. The banks are right now not able to spend the money to sue people on enforcement of loan contracts. That's a big shock. So if you had a contract and you just walked away from it, they'll do what they can, but they're not going to put a lawyer on you trying to sue you.

Probably they would if it was big money, but anyway, but in general, they can't afford to be proactive that way because of the cost of the attorneys. So the crack up boom is where the central bank has to print money as fast, and they used to print it as cash, but now we're talking digits. But they have to create money, they have to create fiat. They have to create fake purchasing units as fast as they can to keep them circulating because of the degradation of their ability to purchase stuff. And the confidence in the system has dropped to the level where it's just about to totally fail.

And so the confidence in the system is one of the key elements and we're about to cross a threshold in that. Now, the little bits of data I've got would suggest that probably around February 18 or so, we will have some form of a crossing of the confidence level and the fiat currency. And so maybe in the end of February we just get to a move. It won't happen this way. This is just something I'm picking up in order to give an example.

But maybe it'll happen at the end of February that we have vast numbers of people with student loans just walk away from them, just stop making payments. Not that they're forgiven or anything like that, but just people just stop making payments on loans. And it would be something is going to trigger, like in that week in February, it's going to trigger the central bank to go full bore on dropping rates and shoveling money out the door as fast as they can into the banks and hopefully they think into the society and social order at large. Won't happen, but they're going to be desperate and they're going to keep trying it. This is a crack up boom.

So they can, and they will drive the stock market to new highs because they're going to Biden. And the Biden regime is going to mandate that everybody in their control, do everything they can to try and convince the normies that the economy is good.

So really, the crack up boom is them. If we were talking about actual printing, the presses would just go and go and go until it was like Leimayer Republic, and everybody had so much cash that no one wanted anything of it, anymore of it. Now we're going to end up with digits where so many, they'll have so many dollar out there that everybody's just going to be sick of it. Right? So getting back to Bo poly, he had said that on Nino's show.

He was saying, oh, biblical. It's going to be biblical. The end of the year, the crash of the system, it's going to die. It's going to be biblical. Silver is going to go through the roof.

Gold's going to go through the roof. Right? None of that's happened. None of it will happen. None of it will happen the way he thinks he's been wrong on all this shit.

All right?

I know people that are really into money, like seriously into money, and they do things even though they're solid, centrist, normie money guys. They will even follow woo people until they prove to themselves that woo guy is not accurate for their business. What they'll do is they'll say, I don't know about this woo shit, but if that guy is making calls on these kind of cryptos and they turn out, I want to pay attention to him regardless of how he's getting the information, right? Because I want to make that money, too. So this is how these big money guys think.

Anyway. So I know one of these big money guys. I mean, we're talking people that are involved in 100 millions of dollars a year in, quote, investments, which it's all speculation, but that's neither here nor there. Anyway, one of these guys that I know, and I've known him for shit, probably 25 years or more than that, he first contacted me late in the 90s, like 99 or something. Anyway, though, he contacted me a while back and we were chatting.

We'd brought up stuff and I'd said, bo Poly, and he was laughing and he, wait, let me go and get it. But they had a report that his investment firm had contracted, and so they'd contracted with an accountant to go through and watch all the Bo poly videos, make notes of all the dates and the prophecy shit that he had been saying, and then go back and do an analysis, which I thought was really, and I won't go into what the guy said about the accountant. He was making really a lot of funny jokes about Bo in the report here. But in any event though, the end result was that they found that Bo Poly's the accountant. Okay, so the accountant isn't fucking around.

He's not taking a quasi hit, he's not taking, oh, it was know it happened in the same month or anything like that, right? They took Bo Polney's descriptions, they applied them to the calendar, and they went back to see what happened on those days, if anything, and so on. And so the guy I was talking to, the money manager, end of things, not the accountant, but the money manager part of this said that it was one out of 27, but Bo got one right out of every 27 of his prognostications. And I would figure that that would be correct, that it was something on that order. It's far less than chance.

So you're going to be better than Bo just by getting up and deciding to have a financial forecast on how many times your dog licks his butt. Something like that. Right. Because Bo's God, his Elohim God, is not delivering the goods. He's only doing one out of 27.

And so the money managers here are not following Bo Poly. They told me about a couple of other guys that are really fucking good. These guys are not using Elohim gods that they're following. The guys that they're following in the Wu business are using obscure kind of algorithms and this sort of thing. Chartists and that kind of deal.

One that really had their attention is a Chartist that plots money and also, like myself, tracks emotion and language. And he's been pretty good. They're saying it's over 60% of his calls on stuff are exact. And out of the 40%, half of those are pretty close. So it's not quite to the number he projects and that sort of thing.

Right. But it's within this range. So they're very impressed with this guy, and they're following this guy and they bought into his service, et cetera. But they're saying, no, we're not paying money to Bo. One out of 27 is not good enough for us.

He actually figures that if he got one out of ten and he knew that he was going to get nine wrong, he could devise a strategy where that one would pay for the other nine and still produce profit for him. But he said one out of 27, he says no. He said you'd end up having to risk vast quantities of money, hoping that you're on that 27th, one that's actually going to pay off. Right. And so he said it's a net loss.

You're just never going to be able to overcome the ods in this. But that one out of ten, they would work it. And anyway, they're working on a guy now that is getting six out of 1060 percent. So they're pleased, they're quite happy, but they're not happy in general because they know the crack up boom is coming. And the reason I was talking to him was we were talking real estate.

He wanted me to basically give him the benefit of my local knowledge on real estate in Washington state and so on. Not good news for him. There's not going to be a safe haven in earning real estate. So there's real estate properties that earn for you. You could rent out an office to a corporation, that's not going so well.

That's commercial real estate, right? These earning properties are properties that would have resources on them that could be harvest intermittently or were rentals for vacation houses, that kind of thing. That's a different market than commercial real estate. It's not really commercial because it's much more irregular in happenstance. It falls into these categories of earning properties, but it's not as good as a resource property.

Even Resource properties are having their problems because the price on resources is all wonky and the fiat currencies are all fucked up. But in general, resource properties are holding their own in terms of relative value. So I know this because I've got a resource property. I own a little tiny bit of acreage, 48.8 acres. It's timberland.

And so we got some good trees we can harvest, et cetera. But going forward, we'll be able to get some income off of that. But anyway, but the crack up boom is coming. Something is going to hit our financial system around the 18 February, 2024 (+/- 3 days) that week. I just picked that day based on the cluster of data and thereafter, I think it's going to start the process that leads us up to hyperinflation in May, and that by then we'll be into the serious crackup boom.

Now, it makes sense that the timeline that I've been able to see where once your country hits a certain level of hyperinflation, once the people start spending the money as fast as they can get it, once people stop going to take out loans and so forth, the country's got about five months before the government collapses. And so that would make our government collapse. If we hit hyperinflation in May, then we're going to have collapse of the government in October or November. And that'll be the point at which you don't have college professors showing up. That'll be the point at which nobody goes to the schools because they're not getting paid enough to make it worth their while.

I ran into a guy today that is making. He's a kid. He's making $17 an hour and it costs him half of an hour's work in order to buy a fast food lunch. He's a big guy. Of course, fast food is not good for you anyway, and he doesn't want to eat it.

But basically his point was, it's not possible for him to pay for housing and pay for food and pay on any debt he may have at this level of purchasing power with the currency. And so he doesn't know what he's going to do. And it's a real bitch for kids that way. He's got an uncle who lives east of the mountains in the dry side of eastern Washington. And so I was talking to the kid and I told him, hey, you might want to go over to your uncle's place.

He told me where it's located and use that as a base. Stay with him for a while and go out and pan gold, get ahead of the game. And so he's seriously thinking about that. Anyway, I'm back here and I got to put away and do chores and stuff. So crank up.

Boom. I figure is the process of it starts in February. You should maybe see all time highs on stock market shit. Maybe in March. And then it's going to go way downhill real fucking fast as we get into April and May.

And that's to say nothing of the impact of the hyper novelty. Anyway, guys, take care. Talk to you later. I got some stuff coming up. Maybe I can make a video about.

View me!

Feds Shoveling That Shit – 12-20-2023

Feds Shoveling That Shit - 12-20-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

Clif High's discourse revolves around economic predictions, personal anecdotes, and criticisms of current economic policies. He discusses the trajectory of cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin, and criticizes individuals like Joe who sold their cryptocurrencies prematurely based on dreams rather than market analysis. High is skeptical of wave chartists but acknowledges their predictions of a significant rise in Bitcoin value. He lambasts the Federal Reserve and government for their monetary policies, predicting they will continue to inflate the currency to maintain power and stave off a depression. This inflation, he claims, will inadvertently boost the value of cryptocurrencies and precious metals as people seek to preserve wealth.

High foresees desperate measures from the government, including mass forgiveness of debts like student loans and possibly mortgages, as a way to maintain control and stimulate the economy. He warns of increasing inflation and its impact on everyday Americans, urging preparation and investment in cryptocurrencies or gold to safeguard against the devaluing currency.

Throughout, High expresses deep mistrust towards the establishment, predicting a potential uprising or civil unrest. He sees the elite as vulnerable, predicting that a chaotic situation might lead to their targeting. Despite the turmoil, High sees an opportunity in the rise of cryptocurrencies and precious metals as traditional financial systems falter. His tone is one of warning but also of opportunity for those who understand the implications of the current economic trajectory.

#ClifHigh #Cryptocurrency #Bitcoin #Inflation #FederalReserve #EconomicPolicy #Gold #Silver #AssetPreparation #WealthPreservation #DebtForgiveness #MortgageCrisis #StudentLoans #EconomicCrisis #DigitalAssets #PreciousMetals #MarketAnalysis #EconomicPrediction #CivilUnrest #EliteVulnerability #GovernmentControl #MonetaryPolicy #Deflation #CurrencyValue #InvestmentStrategy #Recession #BoomBustCycle #FinancialSystem #EconomicOpportunity #WealthBuilding #Survivalism #FinancialLiteracy #EconomicTurmoil #HyperInflation #EconomicInstability #FiatCurrency

Key Takeaways:

The Federal Reserve and government inflationary policies are expected to continue, potentially leading to a significant rise in cryptocurrency values, especially Bitcoin.
High criticizes individuals relying on dreams or inadequate analyses for financial decisions, emphasizing the need for market-based analysis.
Debt forgiveness and other fiscal measures may be used as strategies to stimulate the economy, leading to further inflation.
The public is advised to prepare for a changing economic landscape, including the devaluation of fiat currency and the rise of digital and precious metal assets.
High foresees potential societal upheaval and elite vulnerability, suggesting that a chaotic situation might lead to targeting of the establishment.

Predictions:

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will experience a significant surge in value due to inflationary measures and lack of trust in traditional financial systems.
The government will take drastic fiscal measures, including possible debt forgiveness, to stimulate the economy.
Inflation will continue to rise, affecting the purchasing power of the average consumer.
There will be an increased public shift towards cryptocurrencies and precious metals as a hedge against inflation.
Potential societal upheaval and civil unrest may occur as economic policies lead to greater instability.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Feds Shoveling That Shit - 12-20-2023

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. Just about noon, heading back out to the coast, outward bound. Got all my chores done. I can get ready for the tree removals tomorrow.

Well, they're just dropping the trees tomorrow and chopping them up, and then we'll get the removal next week. Geek. So things are moving right along for the extension on the house. Anyway, wanted to talk about species, right? Money, cryptos, all of that gold.

And, you know, I got a real issue with Joe. He's a nice guy. This is J Snip four. But he had this dream and he thinks it's prophetic. And so he sold all of his cryptos at 38 when bitcoin hit 38,000.

And just like recently, this is a while back, like a couple of weeks ago that Joe sold. Anyway, just recently we've had indicators out of the official dumb that we're about to get into one of those big pumps for the cryptos. So in my opinion, J Snip is going to miss out on all of this. Right? Let me see if I can.

Okay, so there are these people that do this kind of charting when they try and predict where coins are going to go, and they use these candles and reference marks and all of that. And within that group of the chartists, there is these people that are a subset of that, that are waivers, okay? And they think that there's a particular wave formation that goes through currency and stuff. And you can see these waves in hindsight, right? It's kind of an issue to pick them out ahead of time, but if you're pretty good, you probably can.

Anyway, one of these groups had contacted me, I've been talking to them, and just the other day I got an email and they'd sent me this chart thing that they had, which showed that if bitcoin held that it was going to bounce along, in their opinion, it was going to bounce along in the 41 to 43,000 for a couple of days, maybe a week or so, and then it was going to go way up. And the next time it would have any kind of a pullback was when it was about, when it was over 87,000, they had this number, it's like 87,000, I want to say 819 or something, right? And it's just this number that shows up in their chart. When you run the chart out and look, it's like, oh, okay, that's what it should be when it reaches this particular point. So 87,000, and then it'll have a pullback.

They're expecting that pullback might go down to as low as the upper 50s. So from 87,000, they think it might go down, might lose, down to 57,000. So a big correction at that point, then they think there's going to be this next big leg up that will take a bitcoin over 100,000. So that's how these Chartists see the progression of it. And it's like, wow, Joe sold at the wrong fucking time, if these guys are correct, right, he's relying on his dream, and that's fine, but his dream guy should have been a little bit more accurate relative to numbers and convinced him don't sell until bitcoin is at 88,000.

Right? Something like that. Anyway, coincidentally, with the Chartist. So, like, two days after the Chartist guy sent me the email, we start getting into the indicators that the Fed does their little meeting. The Federal Reserve bank, which is not part of the federal government, has no reserves and is not a bank, comes on out and says, well, we're going to have three reductions next year.

So they're giving guidance for next year. Well, all right, so this is part of what we were expecting, the people that follow the fed and all of that. We expected them to do this, and I expected at some point they would have to, as a result of the inflation that they are creating, they would have to do some form of a flood the system with money in order to try to buy votes for the communist Biden regime. Right? And so that's what they're trying to do.

They're trying to forgive student debt so that, oh, Biden's such a good guy, he forgived all of this student debt on me, right. That kind of know, basically trying to buy votes anyway. So when they do this, it's not going to be sufficient for them to simply lower rates. That'll provide a big pop, there's no question about that. But they are going to have to do something to provide more flow, more volume and more speed of the Federal Reserve note, aka the dollar, the petrodollar through the system, because we're just not using it as much, people aren't buying as much.

It's not a big boom time. Everybody knows we're in a recession and all these other reasons they're going to have to do this. And so now we're seeing some of the indications of how they intend to do it. It's going to be a combination of the lowering of the rates and even more than that, setting the expectation for the lowering of the rates. Okay, so they're telling you basically right now we know that the system is fucked.

We know that it's coming apart at the seams, and we're going to try and save it. And that starting next year we'll try and save it by these mechanisms. And then at this point, they're also doing the raising of the federal minimum wage. Now, they're not raising the federal minimum wage to give everybody a raise, okay? They're raising it because they've diluted the money that much.

That in order to keep the system afloat, to keep all these people at the lower end of the economic strata afloat, they must raise the rates or raise the minimum wage just to accommodate this. Now, of course, that has a ripple on effect, right? It causes big problems for all the businesses who have to now raise all of their prices in order to be able to pay for these new minimum wages. And so that's going to force the inflation into particular like avenues, right? So they're forcing inflation into the price of goods by causing an inflationary pressure within the cost of labor.

And so the result of this, though, all right? So there's one more factor to this. Not only are they going to reduce the rates at the fed level, not only are they going to forgive student loans and forgive as much fucking debt as they can, I will not be surprised to see them start forgiving mortgages. Okay? I'm not shitting you guys.

They're going to forgive mortgages. Now the reason they're going to do that is because in the process of forgiving that mortgage, they seize the property. You just don't recognize that. Okay? Anyway, it's not like you're not going to make house payments, but they're going to forgive some aspect of the debt.

They're going to lower the interest rate on it. Something to get you what you think of as a pop, more species flowing through your hands. They're desperate to raise the speed of transactions within the United States because they've slowed down to the critical point where if they slow just a little tiny bit more, we're into a major depression, and we're going to have that depression no matter what. They can't help. It's the end of the system.

They're just doing everything they can to prolong it. A few more days, to give them a few more days of grace, blah, blah, blah. So one of the things they will do is they're going to attempt to flood the system. Probably they'll do something weird, okay? Maybe they'll say, okay, I don't know how they're going to do it, but they'll try and get cash in the hands of the people that are in the lower third of the strata of the economy, and it'll be more than simply raising the minimum wage.

There'll be some kind of a handout from the federal government. This will likely come in probably February or March. It's going to be that dire for them that they'll have to do something at that time anyway, though. So the impact of all of this, all of this stuff that's happening right now is supportive of these wave guys, the Chartists that use the waves, because we're seeing that the federal government is going to shove, the fed and the federal government, the Biden regime, is going to shove vast quantities of federal reserve notes into the hands of everybody they possibly can here in the United States. In so doing, they are going to push cryptos through the fucking roof, because a lot of people will see the panic in these moves, even if they really don't understand economic stuff and so on.

They will start becoming really antsy, really anxious about what's going on, and they will start converting a lot of these newly pimped out dollars, newly created dollars are going to go into cryptos and gold and silver as well. So we're going to see a big support for rising crypto prices within the actions of the federal government. And I suspect that that support is starting already with this pre announcement. Right. Because they're managing the expectation.

They've caused certain things to already occur in the stock markets because of these expectations that they're managing them and the way they're doing it. And so they will have this impact. It's already activated. They'll have to shovel in little bits of stuff as we go along. But they're going to have to try.

Their goal is to try and create a raging fire in the economy for the lead in to next year's election. Right.

Whether we have it or not is immaterial. They are going to act as though we're going to have it. And the regime is going to take this approach, basically, to forestall revolution. Every time you get into one of these major depressions, we have revolution. So in the early 19 hundreds, right after they'd started the Federal Reserve, we almost had a revolution right in the depression in 1914.

And they actually had hundreds of thousands of people that had been in the military at that stage preparing to march on Washington, DC. That was in 1914. Then we go and we do this again in 19 1718, where we've got difficult economic conditions. Then we get the roaring 20s here because the Federal Reserve was trying to compensate for what was going on globally with the failure of the Reichmark, which at that point was one of the primary reserve currencies. Anyway, though.

So here we are, we're right on the cusp of a major run up over the course of this next year due to these circumstances, right? Due to the fact that they're pumping the fiat money, creating more fiat as fast as they fucking can, and then also doing everything they can to get it into circulation so it will be spent. And a lot of people are wise enough and they're going to put it into cryptos as soon as they get it. So we're getting this pump up effect that's going to, in my opinion, the government's going to have to drive that all through next year and keep it going as long as they possibly can to get anything, like any kind of traction that they may with the communist party candidate, whoever the fuck that is. We know it won't be Biden.

Obama is just sick of that fool and he's getting rid of him anyway, though. So they're pimping for a civil war, all of these kind of things. It's just not going to happen the way that the power elite want it to happen. And personally, I think that it would be really kind of cool to have the restraints come off of the population because in my opinion, once we got into any kind of a generalized armament, walking around, kind of shooting war, civil war thing, that there's going to be squads of people that go on out and eliminate and kill all of the elite. They're going to track down any of the elite, anybody that they think is an elite globalist in this country, and they will assassinate them under the COVID of a civil war, and they'll probably blame it on one side or the other.

It doesn't matter. This is like a third force that's going to go in out and do their own house cleaning.

I think that the power elite are really worried about that. And this is the whole Zucker bunker thing. Zucker Bunker in Hawaii, right? These fuckers are worried about the population not liking them and acting on that. So we're seeing it all to hell and gone on the elitist.

And then there's a lot that are really stupid. The elitist and the second tier, they're the ones that are just being used. You really don't know what's going on. They're sort of the normie Satanists anyway. Those people are going to just be slaughtered.

They have no fucking clue. So it's going to be kind of interesting. I actually don't think we're going to get to a civil war as much as Obama and these people want to push it. I just don't think it's going to happen because they don't really grasp where we're at in terms of the emotional tenor of the population. Our tone is not as they perceive it anyway.

So we'll get a big pop in the cryptos, get a big pop in gold and silver. As we go forward here, we know that the scenario that Joe thinks his dreams came out with where we had $6 silver and, you know, I don't know, maybe it was $20 gold or something, whatever it was, we know that that's not going to happen because Costco sold $100 million worth of gold. They sell out within hours whenever they have gold available to be purchased, and they have to limit the sale of it to one per person. There's that much. So now, the only way that we could get those kind of prices that Joe's talking about, that his dream told him.

Now, bear in mind, I don't think his dream is prophetic. I don't think his dream has any merit to it whatsoever relative to predicting the future. Because ultimately, yeah, we were going to get to 38,000 no matter what, relative to bitcoin. The fact that Joe sold, that's kind of weird. But anyway, but we won't get to those dollars for gold and silver unless we go back to a constitutional money, which would be a gold and silver money, in which case $6 an ounce silver doesn't even make sense then under those circumstances, because there's 371 grains of silver to a silver dollar, and at a constitutional level, the support, it would maybe hold a $6 value for silver.

And I think, let me see. Maybe we'd get down to under constitutional money. I don't know. I couldn't project what bitcoin would be under a constitutional money that was convertible to gold and silver. But the only way that we could get that would be the collapse of the federal government and the reinstitution of a constitutional republic, in which case all the bets are off.

We wouldn't have a stock market as you know it now, because all those stocks are bogus. They're rehypothecated a thousand times to one. Nobody's ever getting the shares of the stock. They only get it put into an account in their name, and it's a giant Ponzi scheme. And so that's going to collapse under constitutional money.

So much would collapse under constitutional money that Joe would ever, ever have the opportunity to purchase cryptos at those low prices where they would escalate to the prices that they're getting now. The only reason we have these prices on cryptocurrencies now is because the money is shit. The currency is not worth any fucking thing.

So just saw a mill. I'm going to have to go and talk to. They've got some good prices on lumber anyway.

So it's a juxtaposition. If you're going to have very high dollar values for cryptos, you're going to have to have a very weak currency. If you have a very strong currency, you're never going to have high dollar values for cryptos. So you might know XRP I think is going to crap out. I think XRP is a bunch of shit.

It only has bankers as its customers. And as the banks crash, which they're doing now, more and more of those potential customers and active customers for XRP are dropping out. Two of the banks that were part of the XRP ripple consortium are folding, right. They're being bought out and collapsing. So there's not a lot of strength in that.

But let's just say that XRP continued. And at that point I don't know what he was thinking of buying it at $0.02 or $0.06 or something. But say that you bought XRP after all this stuff and silver was $6 an ounce and you bought your XRP at $0.02. Well, at that level, constitutional money, you don't have inflation, right? You don't have inflation coming in and pumping up things.

You don't have the kind of markets we have now. So if XRP is purchased at two cent, it might well be 30 years before you got XRP up to $0.05 absent inflation, because it's a valuation thing, right? Unless XRP added value, causing people to want to buy it, there's no reason for it to rise in price when the money is stable and is backed by gold and silver. So you see in my problem with all of Joe's dream stuff is that there's no rational scenario that would support these divergent aspects of what came in there. This is one of the reasons I'd never trust my own dreams as any form of prophecy.

Also, there's this thing, okay? So if you have a stake in the game, your dreams will delude you. If you have an emotional attachment to whatever is the outcome in there, your dreams are there to help you work out that emotional attachment. They're not there to tell you the future. Right?

And this idea of spirit coming down and telling you the future in your dreams, well, that's kind of, in my opinion, that's the same level of shit as saying, oh, you know, it's the Daniel timeline, right? And he's working off all this weird math and all this stuff from deliberately badly translated material. So the people that translated and created the Bible that Bo is working off of wanted to deceive people when they did that. And Bo thinks this is the legit word of his God. That's very much akin to Joe thinking that this dream is valid, even though it has to be interpreted, okay?

Even though he has to look at it and say, this means this and this means that, and that means that. And your mind will always lie to you. This is like the thing that the rv guys understand. Your mind will supply to you what it thinks you want to hear. So if you have an emotional attachment.

So asking for a dream is preloading yourself by saying, in my opinion, it's preloading yourself to these emotional states that when you go to sleep or will have your mind trick your consciousness by coming up with this shit. Because in my opinion, Joe's dream is full of shit. Obviously, it is not the scenario. Obviously. So far, there is no crash.

Yes, there probably will be a crash, but it's going to be a crack up boom, which means that we're going to see the stock market go through the fucking roof. It'll be going through the fucking roof with digits. And these digits are based 100% on deflating money. And we're going to have inflation within the numbers, and it's going to be meaningless relative to the stock market because it's a crack up boom. In my opinion, this crack up boom will do a 1920s style pump up of the stock market.

But now we also have cryptocurrencies and gold and silver, and the currency will flow there in increasing amounts to the point that that starts becoming an embarrassment for the Federal Reserve and the powers that be the establishment. And these guys are going to go really fucking. I'm not. I think that before the Biden regime is over, they will probably come up with some form. It won't be a law because they won't be able to get it through the house, but some kind of regulations and stuff on censorship to where they will try and put you in jail for saying their money is worthless, for saying that the Biden regime is corrupt and crooked and all of that we're coming to this point where the communists around Biden are going to have to start really hardening up and showing themselves a little bit more fiercely as we go forward.

Now, it's all going to fail, but it's going to be a really interesting year as this shit fails around us, fails in front of our face. Right? So the thing to do is to prep. You got to get the stuff you need while you have currency that is still effective in purchasing. Even if it's shit for purchasing, you still have to do it.

So now, because it's shit for purchasing, you've got to make really hard decisions as to where to put this dying dollar in terms of your labor getting you money to buy stuff, right? Because now you're going to understand that, oh, look, the currency is deflating. That is to say, we have inflation in the numbers and deflation in the purchasing power of our currency. And it's doing it at such a rate, such a huge, fantastically fast rate that I get my paycheck now. I'd better run out and buy the food now while I can buy those few more calories for those few more dollars, because 30 days from now, it'll be less calories for the same amount of dollars.

And that's meaningful because you need calories to keep your body alive.

So anyway, we're not going to get $100,000 bitcoin parties this year, but it really looks like it's on for next year also. Really looks like maybe at the time that we get into that crash, before we get to constitutional money, which we will head there, but before we do that, we'll hit that $600 per ounce on silver. And again, you won't want to live in that world. It's just going to be too chaotic and everything's going to be too expensive. Nothing's going to work.

We're going to have hyper novelty in the sense that there's no authority anywhere, and so on and so on and so on, right? It's just going to really pile on and cause all kinds of problems in the world that creates the $600 silver, and that will exist briefly. Okay, so $600 silver is not going to be in perpetuity. It's not going to be a multi year thing. Right.

It might only be four or five months that it's at that level. And then we go back to a constitutional money. At the point that we go back to a constitutional money, I could see $6 for an ounce of silver, no problem. But it'll be that way for 20 or 30 years. Bear in mind, okay, for those periods of time that the USA had no central bank.

So before the Fed and after the second bank of the US. So between the civil war and the existence of the Fed, we had no inflation. In fact, that's not true. We actually had a little tiny bit of inflation when they found vast quantities of gold up in Alaska. But we actually had deflation with increasing productivity.

So as Ford came out and started making assembly line stuff, things started getting cheaper. You could get more value for your dollars. This did not sit well with the bankers. That's why they started coming up with their scheme to put the Federal Reserve in place. They need that inflation in order to be able to print the fake money and bribe people so they can steal babies and eat them, that kind of thing.

Anyway, we're probably going to see bitcoin crossing $100,000, in my opinion, before fall of next year. But again, that's not good. It's an indication of how bad the fucking money is. And I'm dealing with these issues now as I try and deal with my housing problems here and running into the sporadic and erratic inflationary rates in various different kinds of material. It's just really bizarre.

Anyway, guys, I got to go and do some stuff. I've got another stop here and I'll make another one of these later. I don't know if we're going to be doing any next week. It's Christmas. I've got to do some stuff on Christmas Day in the following couple of days.

And maybe we'll get our stumps removed that Thursday or Friday of next week. I don't know when we can get the equipment in here. Then we can actually get started building. Okay. Anyway, take care, guys.

Have a happy No EL, right? There's no fucking EL. At least not my area. And it's like, fuck the Elohim. If I knew there was an Elohim around here and I had the opportunity, I'd put a bullet in its head.

Just saying. And it's also like, no, not going to be dealing with observant jews anymore. If you're an Elohim worshipper, you're not my buddy. In my opinion. You're my enemy.

Talk to you guys later.

View me!

Wide view Woo – 10-25-2023

Wide view Woo - 10-25-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The document begins with the author's personal experiences, including challenges with electricity and cold weather. There's mention of a potential phenomenon of ice crystals in the surf due to freezing temperatures. The author then delves into discussions about Penny Kelly's predictions of a micronova in ten years and challenges the validity of such claims. The author believes there's no evidence of a micronova and critiques Penny Kelly's assumptions. The document also touches upon the topic of remote viewing, with mentions of Dick Algaeier and his team. The author appreciates their work but has reservations about working with them due to disagreements with their tasker, Mike.

#author #experience #electricity #cold #weather #ice #crystals #surf #PennyKelly #micronova #predictions #evidence #assumptions #remote #viewing #DickAlgaeier #team #tasker #Mike #disagreements #challenges #validity #phenomenon #beach #sun #moon #BTC #bitcoin #dollar #inflation #banks #cryptos #responsibility #scammers

Key Takeaways:

The author experienced challenges with electricity and cold weather.
Penny Kelly's predictions of a micronova in ten years are critiqued and believed to lack evidence.
The topic of remote viewing is explored, with mentions of Dick Algaeier and his team.
The author has reservations about working with Dick Algaeier's team due to disagreements with their tasker, Mike.
The author discusses the potential rise of Bitcoin and critiques the idea of selling it at 38,000.
Concerns are raised about the declining value of the US dollar and the impending inflation.

Key Takeaways:

Potential phenomenon of ice crystals in the surf due to freezing temperatures.
Bitcoin might reach $100,000 by Christmas or January.
Serious double-digit inflation expected around January or February.
39 banks are expected to close by Christmas.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Wide view Woo - 10-25-2023

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. October 25. It's almost nine. Getting a late start this morning.

Heading inland.

Ah, anyway yeah, no, no, don't don't do that. Cancel. My car is trying do shit on my phone. Anyway, so a rough morning. We've had the shit kicked out of us by wonky electricity, fried our heat system, and then we've had seriously cold weather.

We're going to get supposed to be down to freezing on the beach. So they're on this weekend, so they're thinking maybe Saturday or Sunday we might get this effect of ice crystals in the surf. But still cold, though. I mean, it's 36 this morning up on the bluff where we live and it was 34 down on the beach itself. Anyway, heading into town.

Like I say, it was kind of a rough morning because the first thing out the gate doing my email were a lot of emails about people freaking out.

They were losing it over some stuff that Penny Kelly and Joe J. Snip. Four had said last night on JC's beyond mystic. I think that it's a wacky woo or whatever. Anyway, so people were freaking out about Penny Kelly saying there's going to be a micronova in ten years time and that the sun's swelling and the moon didn't cover it in the eclipse.

Well, she's making all kinds of assumptions that are not valid. Okay? I think it's horseshit. There's no evidence ever anywhere of a micronova.

There is stuff that is claimed as an evidence by David Dubine, but he's got all kinds of assumptions about that stuff that make him think this. Those assumptions are not valid. So neither is the catastrophe cycles that we see that he talks about and some of these other people talk about. A lot of the things that they are saying are cyclic are incidents that happened that are separated in time, but they don't have any clue as to what caused those incidents. Right?

And so you could say, oh, well, the younger dryas ice age mini ice age was shut down. It was, it was stopped, it was undone by a couple of meteors coming in right, about 12,000 years ago. And they seem to have a 12,000 year cycle on some of these disasters. But the problem is you don't know what caused those meteors to come in 12,000 years ago. And they coincidentally happened at the same time that we get a destruction of this island that used to exist.

And this island was like the size of the UK, like the size of England and Scotland, right, and part of Ireland. This is a big fucking island. And it used to exist between South America and Antarctica. And it kept Antarctica warm by funneling warm air down. And when it was removed, which it was, we see this island all over, scattered all over the bottom of the ocean down there.

And when it was removed, it allowed winds to form at latitude 40. That circle endlessly, and they create a wind wall that isolates Antarctica and causes it to be frozen, okay? Without that wind wall, Antarctica, it would be tropical as it was.

We think that this shit happened further back than 12,000 years ago, but it might have happened as long ago as 250,000 years. We just don't know time frames on some of this stuff, right? And it's impossible for us to judge. So David Dubine has influenced Penny Kelly because Penny Kelly has obviously listened to him and is talking micronovas. Well, there's no evidence whatsoever of micronova.

And so Penny Kelly is wrong, and she's wrong in her assumptions. So she's saying, oh, because the sun stuck out like a white wall tire around the moon, the sun is swollen. Well, what if the moon is shrunk, right? The moon's a projection in any event, right? It is not, as she thinks.

It is not a sphere. It is not a planetoid, right? It is an object, a device, a construction. And so it's under intelligent control. So there's no natural consequence involved in the moon.

It's under intelligent control anyway, so there's not going to be a micronova of the sun in ten years. Penny Kelly is hugely wrong. I do not have a okay? So there's not a lot of evidence that any of her forecasts are accurate, all right? Any of the stuff from the guides and all of this sort of thing from her books.

None of that shit has appeared. She was saying, apparently, that there's battles on the moon and the bad guys have been defeated. Well, the moon is a device. There's no battles going on top of it. There's no battles going in it.

There's no evidence of any of that at all. And so she's getting this information out of her mind, making this shit up. Her mind is making this stuff up in order to fulfill her wishes. And her wishes are that she knows some information about the moon, and it has no information, but it's quite happy to make it up for her. There are no battles going on on the moon that way.

There's all kinds of freaky geeky shit going on in the moon. Okay? This is another thing, okay? So I don't know that Penny Kelly has a process, okay? There's no formalized method.

She doesn't go into it in terms of she just puts the results out. Unlike say dick, algae right. His remote viewing crew, they've got this defined process. They work it continuously. They've been working it for years.

It is repeatable. It produces repeatable results that are able to be validated in less than a month or so, because they're doing these things with these one month look aheads. If we examine Penny Kelly's one month look aheads, she's not very accurate at all. And unlike Dick Algae, where they don't know what they're sketching, they don't know what is the proximate cause for a lot of this stuff, but they have the headline right? So they have the view that we'll all get in what we laughingly call the news and so they can be validated, and they're validated on a monthly process.

We got some kind of major road shit going on here, just what we need. Anyway, so Dick Algae's process is repeatable, all right? They know what they're fucking doing, and they do it repetitiously, and you have a validation on that repetition that is able to be checked over time.

It hang on, I got to do some tricky driving road work, tree work, power guys, okay? They're telling me to go slow. He's too close to that exit area there anyway. Geez, giant low boys. They're bringing in heavy equipment for like, maybe waterline or something or sewer.

Anyway, so Dick Algaeier's stuff I find to have some validity, but mostly I discount Penny Kelly's stuff, right? And this is also the same with Joe's dreams, okay? So anybody can have accurate dream states that are forecasting near immediate future events, all right? This is an understood kind of a thing, but it's entirely subjective how you interpret it and so on. What you think you saw in the dream and the repetition of the dreams successfully is not there.

And even if you have a dream journal and you're keeping track of all of this, you will have a tendency of a bias, of a known bias to make yourself valid in your dreams. And so you'll reinterpret at the time of the events, unlike dick algae's stuff, where they sketch it out, they draw it out, and you can clearly see where they are correct or not. And also there's the issue of timing. But leaving the timing aside, what freaked people out was that we're at like 33, 34,000 on bitcoin, and Joe is saying sell everything when it hits 38,000, sell everything you got and wait for the crash and then buy it back cheap. And I think he's full of shit.

I think that dream of his is fixated in his mind and has no validity relative to that statement that he's making. And he's thinking that gold and silver are going to crash in price, and then he's going to buy Tether, which is tied to the US dollar, which is losing its purchasing power by the moment. So none of that makes a lot of sense, guys.

I'm actually waiting to see if he does it, to see when it hits 38,000, if he sells everything, because he's going to be in a world of hurt. My expectation is that we will still have the $100,000 bitcoin price parties, and at this rate, it might be if we're picking up 20% in seven days and that trend even cut in half, held up, we'd have 100,000 bitcoin prices by Christmas, maybe into January. The dollar is dying, so there is no reason to suspect that there's going to be a crash in anything relative to dollar terms. Why should anything fall in the value of a dollar when the inflation is pushing this hard on the dollar. And my data is showing that January, February, somewhere in there, we're going to get into some serious double digit inflation because of shit the Fed's going to try and do to support all of the Biden regime.

Shit. Biden wants another 100 billion to give to Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine. Okay? So how does that benefit the United States? It does not.

How does it hurt the United States? It takes all of our resources and sends them overseas, and it creates a vast quantity, a tranche of money that will be coming back here and causing further fucking inflation. And so if you have further fucking inflation, why buy into the dollar? Why sell anything and go into the dollar?

So, anyway. So I think Joe's wrong. I think Penny Kelly is wrong. I think that Penny Kelly's process is not to be trusted. And I don't trust prophetic dreams to continue, okay?

Because dreams are a function. Dreams are highly complex. They don't just happen. No matter how much you want to have a dream, no matter how much you ask your spirit guides to give you a prophetic dream, yeah, you'll dream. But is it meaningful?

Not necessarily. It could be that you're dreaming as a result of the spices in the pizza or something else that you took that day that affects your mental processes. Okay? So this is the problem with Wu, that if you don't have a scientific approach to your psychicness, then you basically have no approach to it, and you're either believing it all the time or you're not. And that's really what it comes down to.

It's really complicated. You can go into it if you read Ingo Swan's Stuff, his books on ESP, he specifically warns against body processes attachment. Okay? So to a certain extent, this also affects, like, Dick Algier, okay? So Dick Algaeier uses a body processes attachment in order to come up with forecasts.

And so what he'll do is he'll get a vision, right? And so he's described this to me repeatedly. And what they do is he gets the remote viewing vision, and he says, oh, it looks like there's this kind of explosion or something, and there's all these woods, and there's a stream here, and over there is a dam. All right? Now, so he's got an explosion.

It's happening out in the woods somewhere, and there is a dam, like a water dam damning. Up a river somewhere that's in reasonable proximity to where the explosion is going to take place. Now, as far as Dick Algaeier's RV visions and all of his people, daz and all these other guys, I trust that, right? That's a pretty good description of an upcoming event, although we don't have magnitude, we don't have location, we don't have timing. And so then what he does is he'll make these little squiggles, so he'll make like four little squiggles.

And one little squiggle will be labeled winter, one spring, one summer, and one fall. And then he'll look at his vision and then he'll go touch the little squiggle that says spring, and then he'll look at his vision and his drawing, and then he'll touch the one that says winter and then fall, et cetera, right, in summer. And whichever one quote feels appropriate, then that's how he determines what timing to apply to it. And so he's using a body processes. Now what if he was taking blood pressure medicine and maybe he had low blood pressure and he took his high blood pressure, his medicine that raises blood pressure and so maybe that makes him, his body respond to this body processes.

So Ingo Swan was not a fan of body processes, mechanisms that are unchecked, okay? So it wasn't like Ingo didn't use these, but he had multiple systemic or systematic and strategic approaches to these processes. So he would never trust a single one. So he might do that same kind of squiggle thing that Dick Algae does, but he's going to use three or four other techniques to validate that because you can't trust your body. Now body responses, especially these days where we've got chemtrails, we've got polluted food, you got 50,000 chemicals that didn't used to exist in our food, all different kinds of shit.

We got electromagnetic radiation. By the way, I just found a 5G light system about a mile and a half from my house out here on the coast. So they're creeping out along here as well. Anyway though, so Ingo had this of effects and even so, he would many times in his writings you see that he's talking about he did not trust this particular body processes. And this turns out to be valid because later on this XYZ happened and it showed that if he had trusted it, he would have been wrong.

And he actually had the psychic intuition to not trust the processes. So he would sort of rely on his body up to a certain extent and then if he got that psychic impression that uh oh, this ain't going right, then he would just ignore it. So he always came back to the mental processes that he had in place and was refining over all of that time anyway. So I don't know that Penny Kelly does any of this, right, and I know Joe doesn't. Joe has a routine of writing his dreams down in a journal and that's basically it.

And then he goes back and he validates. But it's just like with my stuff. Matching words for events is really difficult. That's why I really like the remote viewing that Dick Algier and his group do is because they have the processes that is visual, that is recorded at the time by their sketches and filling in the little grids filling in the little cells in their grid process that allows them to define all the characteristics and to explore the remote viewing vision. I really do think that remote viewing is highly accurate and very worthwhile, but it's also not mechanistic.

And you can lead yourself into trouble by not having these sorts of processes. So, as I say, will Joe sell everything at 38? In my opinion, he'd be a fool if he sold BTC at 38,000. He's going to be an idiot because he won't be able to buy it back. It won't crash, right?

In any event, though, so I don't think his dream is valid. And if he does, then he'll sell everything at 38 and he will suffer the consequences.

Anyway, though, the reason I'm onto this is I got so many damn emails and so many people freaking out because we're so close to 38,000. They want to know, am I going to sell this kind of stuff? And it's like, sell get dollars for bitcoin? Fuck no. Who wants dollars?

Who wants to buy into the biden regime? And that's what you're doing. You're buying into the Fed, you're buying into the deep state if you sell for dollars. Or Tether, tether is a fucking but I won't go into that. And XRP.

Okay. So the only customer for XRP are the banks. And the banks are failing. 39 banks are laying people off right now. 39 banks will be closed by the time we get to Christmas, all right?

That's going to take a big chunk out of the USA banking infrastructure. So where Tether? Where XRP? Both of these fuckers are tied to banks. Tether is a stablecoin that's tied to your inflation, to the US dollar.

And so, in my opinion, anybody buying Tether is an idiot. Same thing with XRP, right? There is no validation, no use for XRP. There's no limit on it. They can create as much as they want.

It's a Fed scheme. It is a central bank digital currency that is owned by the central banks. Don't be deceived by them having been sued by the SEC, all right? Anyway, like I say, it really pissed me off to have to get into that shit first thing in the morning with all these emails. And I was thinking what?

And see, I didn't watch all that. I came in late last night on the stream. I was there for a few minutes while I was making dinner and that was it. I missed most of what everybody said, but I bitched and moaned about them while I was there because I heard Joe said he was going to sell at 38,000. It's like, boy, you're going to freak a lot of people out.

A lot of people don't understand digital currencies. They don't understand what's going on with it. They're acting on faith and trust. And so if you're going to talk, in my opinion, if you're a woo person and you're going to talk about cryptos, you have a big fucking responsibility. You note I don't say shit about what cryptos I might buy or not buy.

I don't give trading advice. I don't get into that. I will never, ever contact any of you people via telegram offering you trading information or get into my trading group or any of that shit. Those are all scammers, okay?

So okay, so now one last thing here on my last little bit into town here, I'm not working. As much as I like Dick Algaeier, as much as I like Daz and the crew, I am not working with Dick Algae's remote viewing groups anymore, okay? This results directly because of the actions of Dick Algaeier's handler, his tasker. So I'm not going to get into the details. It's not pertinent at the moment.

And they're really screwy, and you got to understand the temporality of everything that was going on. But I had worked a recent remote viewing target through Mike, who is the tasker for Dick Algaeier's group, and I was very dissatisfied. In my opinion. There's something flaky going on. And Mike, even if he's honest, okay, even if he's not being duplicitous, his assumptions about reality are so skewed that they impact the targets.

And I have proof in my last RV session with these guys, so I'm not going to be working with them anymore. I had 40 emails and a lot of discussions with Mike, and it didn't resolve well. So I have no hard feelings about Dick or Daz or any of the guys. They do great work. They're going to continue to do great work.

But me personally, I'm not going to interact with Mike and put a target out there for this guy to do the tasking on because of his process and because of the universal view that he has, that, in my opinion, is skewing everything that he does. So just to let you know, I won't be interacting with them anymore. I mean, Dick and I still send emails to each other, that kind of thing. Dick is still doing great work, still showing up stuff a month ahead in detail and all of this sort of thing, right? But these selected targets where Mike is intimately involved in the association for the target itself, in my experience, they've gone wonky twice.

And so I don't want to have a third repetition, especially with the negative actions that came from this last time.

It was a screwed up mess, guys. And it and it kind of like I want to say it's, it brought some crap on my head, okay? And it and it may develop that this, that this last RV target is going to be end up participating and stuff in the future. I'll get into that at some point anyway, though. So just to let you know, I won't be doing stuff with Dick.

But Dick's stuff is quite trustworthy. I really like their monthly reports of what's coming up in the next month. And in any event, so here we are I'm sort of sort of done with my bitching and moaning about the Wu people, but we're coming up into some very serious times. And so the consequences of making statements about the future, especially for things like cryptos, for us Woo guys, are going to escalate very rapidly. All right?

So if you're a Woo guy, you got to be really fucking careful. So what if Joe gets up there and says, hey, I sold everything at 38,500, or whatever the fuck it is, right? By the way, resistance is 38,889. So I think you'd have to wait after that to see if there was going to be any kind of a crash. Nonetheless, what if he says, I sold everything at 35 or 38,500?

Boy, I'm happy now, I got all these tethers. And then what if he says that in such a way that other people think that he's urging them to sell as well? And then they sell and they find themselves in the same predicament as him, which is that you're going to have to spend more money to buy back what you used to have, because there is not going to be that crash. Because the mechanism does not exist for there to be a resurgence in value in the dollar that would cause such a crash to occur. You can't have an effective crash in solid assets.

Gold, silver, bitcoin, ethereum, a few other coins. They will not crash as long as the dollar is becoming weaker and weaker and weaker every day with this massive excessive printing. And so under those circumstances, to think that there is so basically if Joe had that dream, and if we had moves to have the dollar backed by gold or something like that, I could say, yeah, there's actually a mechanism whereby this could occur. But right now there is no mechanism. That way the dollar is not going to get any stronger.

So you're not going to get silver down at $6. You're not ever going to be able to buy that again. And right now, China is thinking about doing a bump where they would deliberately increase the price of silver, cause all kinds of problems through all kinds of industries, but they desperately need this. And I'll get into that at some other point, but they desperately need that for their high tech industry, specifically solar panels. China's got a world of hurt in their economy, and the CCP's top dog financier people are desperate to find ways out and they're trying all of this shit that had been tried in the previous depression, in the 1930s, just prior to that, none of it's going to work, of course, right.

So you're not going to get a crash in any solid asset. We are not seeing crashes in pricing for solid assets like buildings and stuff like that, and land. What we are seeing is a reduction in price as the debt attached to those becomes so excessive. It has to be laid off one way or another. And so we've got houses out here that had been listed at like six and $7 million.

Big fucking houses, 6000 sqft kind of shit, right? They didn't sell, didn't sell for like more than a fucking year. And so they put them up on auction. And so then they sell in auction because the debt is going to go 100% bad. The house would have to be foreclosed if the lenders didn't agree to do this auction reduction.

And that's basically what it is. And so that house that was listed at six some OD millions of dollars, I think it was 6.5 million, that house has sold an auction for something less than half. Okay? We think, I've talked to some people, we think it's about 2.5 million. And so it would have been less than 50.

So 50% of the debt would have been removed. Now, that's not a crash in the house price. That is the debt restructuring that we're going to go through every fucking place all over the fucking planet as a result of the dollar dying. All this debt has to go away and be restructured. And so we will go through periods of that.

But that's not a crash, it'll be a quote crash in solid prices for solid things relative to debt based material. So here's a good example. Recently, just because I won't go into the details, but we have to come to some conclusions about our house and do some stuff here. And so I was looking at housing and just was interested in it. And so I was looking and I found a house that just came up because of the way I worded the search.

And this house was like, I think it was 1.75 million. These numbers really freak me out, but I understand that it's the debt level, it's the degradation of the dollar that causes those numbers to be attached to this house. Right? Anyway, and so this house at 1.75 million had been on the market for like 180 days or something like that. And at the time that I came across it, I wasn't really that interested, but there were some aspects of it.

I talked to my real estate agent friend here and he provided me with some information on it. And I snooped around on the house because of some other ancillary things, like the guy who built it, right, I wanted to maybe contact him, et cetera, et cetera. Anyway, though, so this house at one and three quarters millions ended up selling and they sold for bitcoin, okay? It was not a dollar transaction. How they've done this with the registering of it and all of that, I have no idea.

I didn't look into that. But when the house sold, the 1.75 million value was basically removed. I don't know how the debt was dealt with or any of that. I don't have any of the details. But fundamentally in dollar terms, it sold for about 900,000, but the whole transaction was done in bitcoin.

Now, okay, so this was done when bitcoin was 21,000. So now bitcoin is 34,000. And if you'd sold your house for all bitcoin, you would have had this 30% increase in the amount of money that you had accepted for your house. So if they'd accepted 900,000 back then and it had gone up 30%, they're now back up over 1 million at 1.2 million. And it is still rising in dollar terms relative to the transaction that they had done.

Again, I don't know how they structured the debt or dealt with the banks or any of that shit. It's complicated, guys, and it's going to get ever so much more so, especially next year, as the amount of unreported printing of money creating of digits, the amount of unreported creation of digits actually comes out. And when that happens, we will have some serious freak outs. We'll go from like, say, five or six or 7% inflation from the fed and from mainstream media, and we actually know it's like 18 or 20%, but we'll go to eleven or twelve or 15% per month as it comes out as to how much money has been printed that they didn't tell anybody about.

It's this huge inflation issue that's going to show up for us next year, that's going to precipitate or participate in the degradation of the federal government. I'm expecting millions of employees to just abandon their jobs and walk away because it won't be worth showing up every day to get that measly paycheck that won't even cover your rent or basics later on. Anyway, guys, got to get moving. It's that sam.

View me!

Inflation Could Really Be Double Digits And Will Keep Rising – Shadowstats’ John Williams – 09-18-2023

Inflation Could Really Be Double Digits And Will Keep Rising - Shadowstats' John Williams - 09-18-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

In August, the headline CPI was reported at 3.7% year over year, but estimates suggest it could be as high as eleven and a half percent. Had changes not been made between 1980 and the early 2000s, the CPI would be around eleven and a half percent. John Williams, the publisher of Shadowstats.com, suggests that the actual inflation rate might be much higher than reported. The primary driver of inflation has been the heavy money creation by the Federal Reserve. The variability seen over the past year is largely tied to oil and gasoline prices. The administration's decision to open the Strategic Petroleum Reserve influenced gasoline prices. The CPI's recent upturn was due to rising gasoline prices, which are expected to rise further. The Federal Reserve's perspective on inflation is that an overheating economy drives it. However, the economy was already in recession when the pandemic hit. The current economic indicators suggest a deepening recession.

#August #CPI #Inflation #Shadowstats #JohnWilliams #FederalReserve #MoneyCreation #OilPrices #GasolinePrices #Economy #Recession #Pandemic #StrategicPetroleumReserve #EconomicGrowth #HeadlineCPI #CoreCPI #BLSReport #MoneySupply #Unemployment #GDP #PetroleumReserve #BankingSystem #LaborMarket #Employment #UnemploymentRate #DiscouragedWorkers #EconomicStatistics #FederalReserve #EconomicIndicators #HeadlineGraphs #EconomicCollapse #EconomicDeterioration #EconomicAssessment #EconomicOutlook #EconomicPatterns

Key Takeaways

The headline CPI for August was 3.7%, but estimates suggest it could be much higher.
John Williams of Shadowstats.com believes the actual inflation rate might be higher than reported.
The main driver of inflation is the heavy money creation by the Federal Reserve.
The variability in inflation over the past year is largely tied to oil and gasoline prices.
The economy was already in recession during the pandemic and is showing signs of a deepening downturn.

Predictions

Gasoline prices are expected to rise further in the coming months.
The economy is showing signs of a deepening recession.
The unemployment rate, based on broader measures, indicates a weakening economy.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Inflation Could Really Be Double Digits And Will Keep Rising - Shadowstats' John Williams - 09-18-2023

Looking at the month of August. This morning we had a headline CPI that came out at 3.7% year over year, my estimates up at about eleven and a half percent. And had those changes been made, not been made between 1980 and the early 2000s, they'd be 40 with CPI of around eleven and a half percent right now. CPI numbers came out today on Wednesday, and it looks like headline CPI ticked up yet again to now 3.7%. Core CPI has continued to fall now down to 4.3%.

We're talking now with John Williams. He is a publisher of Shadowstats.com, and we'll be talking about his measurement of what inflation could actually be. It may actually be much higher than it is today, his outlook on inflation, what's been driving inflation, and his outlook on economic growth. John, an honor to host you. Big fan of your work.

Thank you for joining us today. Thank you for having me. First, talk about what happened last month. With inflation ticking up slightly to 3.7%, what's your initial reaction to today's BLS report and the numbers that they released? What do you think drove inflation?

Well, underlying the inflation has been very heavy money creation by the Federal Reserve that's underlying it. But the variability that we've seen over the last year or so has been largely tied to oil prices and gasoline prices rising and falling. Specifically, if you look back at the pre election environment, a year ago, inflation, inflation was rising and the administration opened up the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and liquidated part of that to create a better supply of gasoline, which helped to bring gasoline prices down. And they also exported some of that which helped to boost the net exports and get the GDP up. While coming into the election, they drained about half the reserve and that pretty much continued into January of this year.

But now, from what I can see, it is not being drained. And you're beginning to see some reversal of those numbers as the markets responded. The big factor today in the upturn in the CPI was rising gasoline prices. And you've got much higher gasoline prices ahead. The gasoline prices came down before the election that gave you lower inflation coming into the election.

But gasoline prices are on the rise again, you can see them. Just to follow up on what you just said, why do you think there will be higher gasoline prices ahead, bringing the system back into balance in terms of supply and demand? Again, what the administration did was they took artificial means to flood the system with gasoline. That's pretty well worked out. Now we're going back to the older supply circumstance which will push the gasoline, it'll narrow the supply of it's narrowing the supply of gasoline and pushing gasoline prices higher.

Do you have an estimate or an idea of what the equilibrium price of oil should be?

What I'm looking at in the pricing here is generally how it gets translated into the US. Gasoline prices, I think you'll be another 10% higher the next two to three months. Okay, so going back to your inflation outlook, I didn't mean to interrupt you. So your outlook on inflation that I'm guessing is also going to be higher because of your outlook on gasoline. Well, in terms of the headline CPI.

But if you look at the way the Federal Reserve looks at the numbers, if you listen to the Fed Chairman, when he's outlining where things stood, he said that we had an overheating economy that was driving inflation and he was raising interest rates in order to kill the overheating economy and to kill the inflation. This is early on in the Fed's cycle here. Now, you had an economy at that point which was already tanking or had tank. The pandemic had hit, economy was in recession. We're heading back into recession even with the official numbers.

So that to say that the economy is overheating and they were raising rates to cool off the economy and that would help bring down inflation, that certainly helped to cool off the economy because the economy has continued to weaken since then. We're in a deepening recession. You're not seeing growth in any of the major economic indicators except the GDP, and even that's beginning to falter. We are going to talk about your recession outlook and your economic assessment, but I want to draw the viewers attention to your work on shadow stats. You provide what the site describes as alternative data or alternative charts, and in particular, you followed inflation for quite some time using a metric that they used to use and they no longer use.

So can you please just describe, first of all, your methodology for making this calculation and second, what your findings are for what inflation should be? Should we use these metrics? Sure.

What happened? And I'll contend that the headline CPI is about as good a measure you can put together of inflation as you had it up until the early 1980s. What happened in 1980 is all of a sudden you had a surge in consumer inflation, much as we had a year or two ago. Here where the Congress had set up a cost of living adjustment for Social Security recipients. They realized all of a sudden they were going to have a big dent in their budget for the next year because the amount of adjustments made to bring the Social Security recipients up to speed with inflation was going to be quite meaningful.

And what they did, instead of doing anything per se to reduce inflation fundamentally, they worked to redefine the series. And they so instructed the Bureau of Labor Statistics Catherine Abrams, who's then the head of the BLS, had in her memoirs that said, gee, if only you could find a way of using this way to approach and calculate these numbers, we might be able to find more money for the BLS. It was clearly aimed at changing the methodology, reducing the numbers, and effectively not being fair to the people who would go in on Social Security with the belief that their cost would be covered in the future. For rising inflation, the first thing the government did in its readjustment, one of the biggest single components was in housing. And it used to be that you'd have a measure of the cost of owning a house, but they redefined that as homeowners equivalent rent, where the government determined what the average homeowner would pay himself to rent himself his own house, and then they would estimate how much he'd be increasing the rent on himself going forward.

And then that was their inflation measure. And right up front, that knocked one and a half percentage point off the headline CPI. And the government's been very open about that. Every time they make a change, they explain what's happening, they estimate its impact. And all I've done is, I've taken the standpoint that the government should have left its methodology in place and done other things to balance things.

The people who came into the system and what they came into the system with is what I estimate. That's where the inflation measure is today, as I'm measuring it. Had they not made all these changes, and they've made a number of changes from 1982 into the early two thousand s the first decade of the 2000s, aggregate differential is up around eight percentage points at this point. So that it's.

I restate it as though they had not made those interim redefinitions because it's not on a consistent basis in reporting. I'm trying to report it as consistently as I can with the way it would have been. So that right now, looking at the month of August this morning, we had a headline CPI that came out at 3.7% year over year, my estimates up at about eleven and a half percent. And had those changes been made, not been made between 1980 and the early 2000s, they'd be reporting with CPI up around eleven and a half percent right now. Even by your own measurements, the CPI has been coming down since its peak from last year.

John, is that primarily again because of the falling oil price? Yes, a lot of it's due to the falling oil price.

In fact, the oil prices probably have been the single biggest component there in terms of the volatility. But in terms of the high level that you're living with here, that's primarily due to the money supply. The variabilities with the oil price, the general magnitude is due to the money supply. Now, do you think that the money supply will at some point revert back to positive growth? The M two money supply has been contracting on a year over year basis, as you know, over the last year and a half.

Is there some point in which that could reverse in the next maybe twelve to 24 months. You think it's possible? The Fed can do a lot here. If they want to bring the inflation under control, they need to bring the money supply under control. What you're seeing with the broad money supply right now, the M Two is down about 4% year over.

Excuse me. Yeah. The broad money supply is down about 4%, I believe, year over year. So it actually has shrunk some. But the narrow measure is up about 4% year over year.

And it's not just the year to year change there, but what happened in that first year. When you're looking at the tremendous liquidity that was pumped into the system at the end of that first year after the pandemic hit, the most narrow measure was up something like 120% from where it was before. Year over year, the broad money supply, M Three, was up something like 43%, 44%. Year over year. That's unheard of.

But since then, as you go from year over year against the big disruption the year before to the next year, where all of a sudden your year ago was also at an elevated level, all of a sudden the year to year change comes back in line. So what we had is effectively a balloon of money growth in that first year following the pandemic. And all that cash that was surged into the system to prevent systemic collapse is still there. Do you think that the Federal Reserve may have overtightened monetary policy and contracted the money supply too much? No.

Let me put it this way.

They need to get the system back into balance.

It's very difficult to do this in a painless manner.

I don't see an easy way out of it for it. If they want to have a stable economy and a healthy banking system, it's difficult at present. The economy right now is contracting. If you look at things ingestion inflation, look at things such as retail sales, industrial production, the construction area, even the unemployment numbers turned negative last month. You had a jump in the unemployment rate.

That's showing a troubled economy. It's not booming the GDP year over year, it was heavily gimmicked by this oil deal. If you took the oil out, you'd had two negative quarters of GDP back in 2022. The last half of 2022 would have been negative except for the oil gimmicks. And we're now at the brink of probably turning negative again with the headline GDP, unless they start playing games again with the oil, which I don't think they can afford to do, given the depleted level of the petroleum reserve.

So it's not a stable circumstance. You don't have a booming economy. You never have. And it wasn't overheating. The Fed talked of raising the rates to kill inflation, but it needed to provide liquidity to the banking system and profitability to the banking system.

The banking system is fragile so that the higher rates, they have better margins. And with the money supply. They have liquidity which they need, but the money supply has not been meaningfully altered to try and contain the inflation. They didn't worry about the inflation initially. They knew it was going to be a side effect, but they were more worried about a systemic collapse and they prevented a systemic collapse.

And my hats off to them on that. Now, John, I like to play a clip of President Biden making a speech about the labor market. I've showed this to a few economists and I've gotten various responses. I like to get your response to this 1 minute clip, so I'm just going to play it for you. Please take a listen.

Sure. My predecessor was one of only two presidents in history who entered his presidency and left with fewer jobs than when he entered. Look, look at where I are now. Just this morning, we learned that the economy created 190,000 jobs last month. All told, we've added 13.5 million jobs since I took office, around 800,000 of them manufacturing jobs.

We created more jobs in two years than any president ever created in a four year single four year term we did in two years. What's more, when I took office, the unemployment rate was 6.3%. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted that it would not get below 4% until the end of 2025. Now, unemployment and unemployment rate has been below 14% for the last 19 months, the longest stretch in over 50 years. We recovered all the jobs lost during the Pandemic.

We've added a million more new jobs. More than 700,000 people joined the labor force last month, which means the highest share of working age Americans are in the workforce now than at any time in the past 20 years. Absolutely not. That's nonsense.

First of all, he has people working with them who play with the numbers. But when he came into office, you were sort of at a nader and you had the collapse of the Pandemic in terms of the employment. So coming off what is the worst employment collapse in modern time? And having one of the greatest jobs gains and boost is not surprising. It's all relative.

The unemployment rate is not too meaningful, and let me explain why. Because I started off with the CPI, because I wanted people to have an honest report on what was happening to inflation. But the government has changed the way it does things with other numbers, including employment, unemployment, and the GDP. So I look at the way those numbers have been changed, and one thing that you'll find with the unemployment is the way that it's defined.

The headline unemployment rate is simply the count of the people who are out of work, want a job. And if you're out of work but you're not actively looking for work, you're not counted as unemployed. So that's the headline unemployment rate. And that got real low under President Trump, and it got real low here but now you're seeing that rise. There are broader measures, and I look at the broader measures as being more meaningful because people get discouraged.

There's no work to be had, and so they stop looking. They're called discouraged workers. If you haven't looked for work in the last, I think, six weeks, you're not generally not counted as unemployed. But if you weren't looking because you didn't think there were any jobs to be found, they'd count you as a discouraged worker, but they only count you as a discouraged worker for a year. After that, you're no longer counted.

If you look at some of the amazing jumps in the numbers here, what you'll find is that with the extraordinary gyrations that the employment numbers and really all the economic numbers have gone through with the Pandemic, you have some unusual things. And the first anniversary where people would be discouraged from working, or candidates discouraged workers because of the Pandemic, no job to be had, afraid to go back to work.

All of a sudden you have a sharp drop in the broader unemployment rate because they're just defined out of existence the way the unemployment rate is estimated with the payroll numbers.

That's an estimate based on what companies are actually doing in the way of payrolls. And those numbers, after a year or so, when they have hard numbers in hand, are probably the most accurate employment indication out there. But in between, you get all sorts of variations in Gyrations with the surveying and other games that are played. But the reason that the unemployment rate is as low as it is is that you have a lot of people who consider themselves to be unemployed but are not counted as unemployed because of the definitions and timing. And part of that is due to distortions that came out of the Pandemic.

The numbers that you're seeing with any of the economic statistics here have been knocked all around with the effects of the Pandemic. You wrote in a commentary earlier in the month that you think that the Federal Reserve wanted to trigger a recession, and it looks like it has succeeded. You said, starting here with the headline graphs on unemployment. Although the upside movement in the unemployment rate is minimal, the longer term plot shows it has started to take on the shape of something that was last seen with the Pandemic collapse in 2020. I think the general question would be whether or not, based on your calculations, the unemployment rate already indicates we are already in a recession.

Yes, it does.

The broader unemployment rates have been rising with me, but you'll see that in the last couple of months that the actual level of the unemployment rate has gone higher. Now, mine is a broader measure than the other ones because I include basically long term discouraged workers. That's a much higher number than the government has. But the government in the headline numbers, you get counted as unemployed only in the headline number, only if you're actively looking for work, then if you're you want a job, you're actively looking for work. If you've been looking for a job and got to work and there are just no jobs to be had at the moment, you're not looking, they don't count you.

And there are different degrees at which they measured going to their broadest measure, which is a U six, which after three months of discouragement, maybe six months of discouragement, they just don't count you anymore. So what I'm looking at those numbers and the patterns there, and the broader measures which the broader measure that I have, my broader numbers are getting as bad as they've ever been. And you look at the patterns of deterioration, the broader measures are getting worse. The headline numbers are getting worse. And that is to me an indication that the economy is weakening, not getting better.

I think the average consumer or a person watching this is wondering to himself or herself whether their standard of living is going to change in either way going forward into the next twelve to 14 months or 24 months. Given your outlook on inflation, given your outlook on economic growth or deterioration, what do you think?

I'm looking at a deteriorating economic circumstance, which will probably mean some deterioration in the quality of life and people's incomes depending on their employment circumstance.

The Fed has moved to kill the economy as much as it can by raising interest rates and it's having its effect. But the economy was already sinking. It was not exploding. It was not booming as the Fed was advertising. They were using that as an excuse for the inflation and why they needed to raise rates.

The reason they raised rates was to give the banks a better business environment. And the reason they flooded the system with liquidity was indeed to keep the system afloat, to keep the, the banking system afloat, to keep the banks set with liquidity. But it is that inflation, it's a money supply. Extraordinary growth. There big, big bulge now.

Yes, it's not changed much year over year since last year, but last year it was up 120% in the most liquid area. And that bulge is still there. And that's what's driving the inflation. We had an upturn in the inflation today.

That's due to two factors. One, again, just an underlying inflationary environment. But secondly, you had the variability of the gasoline prices, and that's going to go up and down, but the gasoline prices were catching up closer to reality. Do you anticipate the unemployment trend that you've just talked about to continue, which is to say unemployment will continue going up? I'm looking for the economy to continue to slow.

Know, either the federal government or the Fed gets more clever than they have been, but they're both right now doing everything they can to not necessarily deliberately to effectively stimulate inflation. The Fed, with its money supply growth, and we'll see if they cut back on that. They've leveled off. But again, you still have the bulger. The federal government just eliminated the debt.

So you're going to get an increasing flow of federal government spending on top of what the Fed's been doing here. And with the net result that you're probably going to see higher inflation, but the wages are not going to keep up with the higher inflation. So it's going to be a weakening economy for the average person. A final point I want to bring to your attention is a great wealth transfer that is to be expected over the coming decade. Currently, the baby boomers, people born between 1946 to 1964 hold the majority of wealth in America.

And as time passes, they're expected to transfer this wealth to the younger generations, the Generation X's millennials, and the youngest generation, Generation Z's. What does this wealth transfer mean for, first of all, asset prices, and second, just the economy overall?

Well, I would expect the impact to be very slow. Whatever impact it's going to be, you're already in the process of people just don't you don't lose five years of people overnight. It's a very slow process.

It I would not see that as destabilizing, probably stabilizing because it'll be, you know, the wealth to the extent the wealth gets transferred to the next generation, the next generation will have new uses for it that will presumably be put forward in a positive manner.

I don't see any real negative implications. I would say it's generally positive. It's a normal cycle. How much you end up putting people on Social Security or such, that may be another issue because that's going to be increasingly expensive. No limits on it.

Now, my problem is I think you're going to see a very uncontrolled circumstance with the government, with the Federal Reserve in the next year or two. When I say uncontrolled, rapidly spending money that the government can't pay off. The Fed has already created a tremendous amount of money that it's very difficult for it to pull out of the system. Both those areas are debasing to the US. Dollar, meaning higher inflation.

And I think we've got real risk of the inflation problem getting out of control here in the next year or two. Yes, that's what I was wondering, whether or not, again, going back to the wealth transfer, whether or not it has any long term implications for inflation, which is to say, have you noticed any differences in spending patterns between the older or younger generations? Well, the younger generations will tend to spend it on more near term needs, but the younger generation ages as well. I don't think there's going to be enough shift in the demographics in the next, let's say five years versus the last five years. It would make a marked difference in the other areas that are right now gyrating out of control.

But yes, that's an ongoing process and it helps the younger generations, helps their liquidity. Final question. You said that the inflation rate has the potential to go out of control.

Nobody knows for sure, but do you have an estimate as to what would be a reasonable level of inflation in the future, given your calculations? Well, today we had something that's historically it's, you know, we're still at levels that are high historically. In fact, we got up to levels last seen back in the beyond.

I don't think we're going to get back to 1% inflation again for a long time. I think where you are now is probably going to be the near term bottom. And with the way the Fed is still pumping up the system, it doesn't have an easy way of getting that cash out of the system. That cash is all sort of underpinning things as they are.

I think you're going to see the Fed will continue to not withdraw the money supply. Probably it's going to have to put some more in. As the economy continues to weaken, they get their desired recession and then they supposedly want to get out of it. That's all complicated on the federal government side where you now have unlimited government spending which has to be funded.

I think in order to contain the inflation, the Fed really needs to cut back its money supply growth severely. If you get back to where you were before then that's got to be done over five years or something. You may have a circumstance that will stabilize, but where it is now as that gets worked through, I think you're going to see the or as they attempt to work through it, I think you're going to see increasingly higher inflation, headline inflation.

It's higher now than they're reporting. So I'm guessing then you don't think the Federal Reserve will cut rates anytime soon, given that inflation will not come down anytime soon. Well, they could cut rates if they wanted to stimulate economic activity, which doesn't necessarily mean inflation, but they seem to be playing it that way.

What the Fed has done here primarily has been to keep the banking system afloat. They're owned by the banking system.

The banks need to be able to lend money. They need to be liquid, they need to be able to make money in lending money. And the things that the Fed's targeting here is aimed at keeping banking system solvent and in place. If they lose the banking system, you're going to end up with a new economy, new banking system. Such well if you don't expect the inflation rate to return to 2% in the future, in the foreseeable future, can we then expect the Fed funds rate to stay elevated at around 5%?

Is that the new norm? Of course that has implications for our credit card rates, mortgage rates, all other interest rates. Well, I think the Fed concluded that it had interest rates too low and I think they want to have a shift higher in basic interest rates. I don't think they're not going to go back down to where they were, but I think they may well go higher as they try to contain things here. It's not stable.

They don't have things in balance. The pandemic is extraordinary. The extraordinary magnitude had extraordinary effects, extraordinary reaction by the Fed. The Fed doesn't have a way of unwinding it. They're trying to they want to keep everything as stable as possible.

But number one, keeping the banking system stable because that's their primary baby. That's what they're there for. If they lose the banking system, you have all sorts of economic chaos. So it's they're they're gonna I don't think they're gonna let the money supply get back as low as it was. They'd like to see the interest rates permanently higher than they've been historically.

They've been extraordinarily. So it'll whether they can get it there or not while keeping the system together is another matter.

Thank you very much for a very thorough interview. John, where can we learn more about your work in ShadowStats? There actually is a website, Shadowstats.com. It's been around for 20 plus years, and it was on a web host that back in August went out of business with little notice and had to move it moved the site, but everything was sort of antique in its writing and such. Right now I've got a site either go to WW Shadowstats.com, it's got all the archives in it.

You can see what I've written in the past, but it's very difficult to interact with. So I'm setting up a new site. It's got to be rewritten, but everything that I've written, what I put on the way of commentary, graphs, I publish alternate data, numbers on inflation, unemployment and such. The subscribers are all getting that by email link. So if anyone's interested, just drop me a line at Johnwilliams @ shadowstats.com.

I'll send you the details. I'll send you a sample of what I put out. And I offer two subscriptions at varying lengths. One year at $175.06, months at $89. Excellent.

Well, we'll put the links down in the description below, so make sure to follow John and Shadow stats. Thank you very much again, John, I appreciate your time. Dave, thank you very much and thank you for watching. Don't forget to like and subscribe to this channel.

Narradigm Investigations Ecology – 08-12-2022

Narradigm Investigations Ecology - 08-12-2022

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

On 12 August 2022, the document discusses the ecological threats posed by central banks, particularly the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its associated entities. These organizations are likened to a controlling octopus that influences global governance structures, including the United Nations. The central banks, the Rothschilds, and the WEF are seen as interconnected entities. The central issue is the degrading purchasing power of the dollar since its inception in 1913. Over time, the dollar's purchasing power has diminished, leading to economic challenges and shifts in consumer behavior. This has resulted in the rise of planned obsolescence, where products are designed to have a shorter lifespan. This trend has led to a shift from durable materials like glass to plastics, which has ecological implications. The push for green energy, such as windmills and solar panels, is criticized for not being energy efficient in the long run. The document also challenges the prevailing narrative about global warming, suggesting that the world is heading towards an ice age. The WEF and other global entities are criticized for pushing a narrative that doesn't align with this perspective.

#Ecology #CentralBanks #WEF #Dollar #PurchasingPower #PlannedObsolescence #Glass #Plastic #GreenEnergy #Windmills #SolarPanels #GlobalWarming #IceAge #EconomicChallenges #Environment #Narrative #Critique #Inflation #Energy #Diesel #Biosphere #Malthus #Vernonsky #Governance #UnitedNations #Rothschilds #EconomicForum #Pollution #Recycle #ClimateChange #Weather #Rainfall #Rivers #Lakes

Narradigm Investigations Ecology - 08-12-2022

Sounds working. Okay, so today is the 12 August 2022.

We're going to talk about ecology and the greatest threat to the planet Earth and all of humanity, which of course we all know. The ending of the story is the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) and their associated giant octopus that controls all of the governance structures on the planet, United Nations, all of this stuff. The central banks, I'm not going to get into the details of who they're related and how they're related.

The mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) and the Rothschilds and the central banks are essentially all the same thing, just looking at different groups within their overall structure with different names. So the World Economic Forum is a convenient focal point for discussion about the octopus that controls the planet because we have Dr. Evil there. So if you don't know Dr. Evil go google or search for "Dr. Evil Claus Schwab" that phrase, it'll bring up that image. Okay, so this is a discussion about the central banks and why they are the greatest threat or the World Economic Forum. Whatever face of the central bank structure is the greatest threat to the ecology of our planet. And that has to do with the degrading purchasing power of the dollar.

So they start out 1913 and they create their dollar. And one dollars actually has a purchasing power of approximately $99 because there's interest attached as soon as you've got it. Now, the interest on this flows through into the government, but they're actually taking that from you, the people. So you get one dollars and you end up with $99 worth of purchasing power. Now, you don't actually see this connection, right, because of the way that the scheme works, where they loan the money to the government, the government hands it to you, the government assumes the debt, but they indebt you to pay it off.

So you're the cattle. You're the cattle.

And so what occurs is a disconnect in the mind of the user relative to the currency and the shrinkage of it through this artificial tax called inflation. And they've always had that tax and usually it would run about 10%. So they were taking a dime out of every dollar and purchasing value from you, and you just didn't notice because you were always dealing with the same species. So you'd always get a dollar. And it wasn't like you would get a portion of a dollar and then a smaller portion so that you would notice.

Or it wasn't like you would see that they were changing the numbers up here. So that this is now a million dollars, because it now takes a million dollars to buy a Starbucks, right? Something like that, Zimbabwe style, which we're all coming to. That's why all of this shit is happening now. So now we're in 2022 and we've come to the situation where our dollar being issued to us.

So you come on out, you get one dollars and you have less than $0.01. So something less than one cent of purchasing value that you can use. And if you go back and look at what you could buy in 1913 for a dollar federal Reserve Note as opposed to today, you will be absolutely shocked. So in 1913, you may be able to eat very, very, very well for two, three days on a dollar if you were judicious. Right?

And this was a period of time up until 1933, this was a coexistence between the Federal Reserve Note the actual gold and silver dollars that were issued by the government. And so there was a coexistence of those two. They take away our ability to use gold, and then over the 1950s, they take away our ability to use silver by extracting it from the money. Surreptitiously. They told us they were going to do it, but they did it really slow, so nobody noticed.

Okay, so that's the setup. Now we note some really interesting things that between 1933 and 1958, all kinds of weird shit happens. Not only the space aliens, and not only the sudden rush at the 1956 57 and 58 to get down to Antarctica and get something, whatever the fuck was going on down there. Not only those kind of weirdnesses, but a more subtle weirdness came into existence. So from 1933 to 1958, we come up with this idea of planned obsolescence.

Planned obsolescence, the idea that you make products cheaper today than you did yesterday, and that they have less lifespan tomorrow than the ones that you produced the day before. So that you're always making cheaper goods. Up until we get to this point here in our story, it was denigrated and it was reduced. But between 1913 and 1933, for that 20 year period of time, we had still had a cultural focus on craftsmanship, substantiability, long lasting. So a tire you bought in 1933 for a vehicle was better than that same tire for the same weight of vehicle produced in 1913.

The tire in 1933 had more engineering into it, more science involved. It had a longer lifespan. This was a case of all kinds of goods. So early construction of any kind of consumer device was much more crude and much more unstable and much more needing of extra effort in the 1913 than 1933 because we still had a slop over of actual value that we could put towards greater engineering, greater science and so on. That is not this immediate return.

Okay? So that's the issue. So the central banks, so this is all done by the Federal Reserve Bank, right?

The evil fed here, engineers in this interest scam into the money, and it has these consequences. The consequences include planned obsolescence. And we note that when planned obsolescence came out in the 50s, really emerged as a driving business model. In the driving corporate business model, we get the shift from glass to plastic why is that? Because plastic is cheaper.

It breaks down and it's lighter weight when you have less purchasing power. And so, say by the 1950s we were at maybe we were at every dollar you could actually buy something with, right? So we'd lost like 40% of the value and the money by that time. So getting into plastic, it costs less to ship and handle plastic. One of the things you'll note is that over time, if you were to go and track it, the purchasing power of the dollar relative to energy, relative to not electricity, but relative to energy in the form of oil or electricity off of Hygo power, you could use that as well.

But energy off of oil, as the purchasing value of the dollar decreases and thus the nominal dollar amount needed for a barrel of oil rises, we get into this point where they're doing anything and everything they can. The central bank, I mean, to incentivize through our government planned obsolescence and a conversion towards more inexpensive and less long lasting items because of the energy involved. And you can't fiddle with energy. So when the purchasing value of the dollar drops, you have to use a lot more of them for this one commodity above all others. And that's energy.

Let me note that the most famous person for energy in all of humanity is Nikola Tesla. And they tried to replace him with Einstein. They tried to denigrate Tesla. Tesla wrote a little book, it's a great little book called something along the lines of "The Effort to Get More Energy for Humanity", something like that. So it can't be more than 80 pages.

Really cool thinking. Anyway. But they tried to replace him with Einstein, who was a plagiarist and a doofus and a fuzzy headed thinker, and they tried to replace the ether with quantum mechanics. In the in the 1920s we had a bunch of economic crises that caused the Bolshevik Revolution, caused the corruption of the German state as a result of the Weimar hyperinflation, and so on and so on, right? So all of these crises were occurring because we'd lost that 1st $0.20 or so in the purchasing value.

And it was becoming noticeable because prior to the dollar or the value of a purchase of energy stayed stable. Then we started getting into the oil and its purchasing price starts really jumping. And you can check me on this. I think maybe it went from like ten cents a gallon to rise very rapidly up to like 25 or thirty cents a gallon for crude oil. And that's the ultimate measure is like West Texas crude or something like this, right?

A steady, stable supply that you can track over time. If you track it, you find that energy costs while they fluctuate. They're really on this gradual rise relative to the failure of the dollar. And now we're at this peak. So we're now at the peak of everything.

The peak of bullshit, the peak of political chaos, the peak of inflation, the peak of hyperinflation, the peak of our current civilization based on this fiction. The debt, the dollar, right, the Fern, the Federal Reserve note. So this peak of stuff occurs as we are at the peak of no purchasing power left. So it's the absolute bottom of the Federal Reserve note in terms of purchasing power and in terms of how many of them are on the planet, it's the peak. We've got so many trillions of dollars printed and promised that we don't know how many we've got.

So right now we're getting into a discussion about the ecology of the Central Bank and how they've incentivized things like converting all products from glass to plastic. Well, this has a terrible side effect on everything. It's polluted all of our landfills with plastic that we're now going to have to go and recover once we get beyond the death of the Fern and get back to solid money. We'll do that. We'll start cleaning up things because it'll be easy to recycle the plastic into oils.

Okay? And then we're going to convert back to glass because glass has all these exceptional values. One of the things we're going to discover is that you can't ship effectively. It's not good to ship food products in plastic. That's why we've got microplastics in our gut and our lifespan is decreasing.

Well, that was good for the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants), but we don't want them. They're going to go away. So we need to make it good for humanity again and get back to more effective ways of dealing with things. But we can't do it now because we can't afford it. Now we're going to cross down to a threshold here on purchasing value very quickly now that we've reached this particular threshold or breakpoint.

Zimbabwe, Venezuela super hyperinflation is occurring now. It's just temporarily abated as they're doing everything they can for the midterms, these techno communists that are ruling everything for the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants), okay, without the technical communists, without the people that are technical, the mother Weffers have nothing. They can't do shit because they're so fucking stupid and they have no real power. They don't own anything, they don't produce anything anyway.

So part of the planned obsolescence includes, as I was pointing out, energy is the key, is this shift over to green energy. A lot of it is we can't afford to pay for real energy extraction. We can because all we have to do is get back to sound money and throw away the debt instruments and get rid of the weapons in the Central Bank and we're good. We start over and we're roaring right. And we will have learned our lesson this time anyway, though.

So we now have these mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) out there insisting that everybody go green with these giant fucking devices, these super huge windmills. Now let me note that those windmills will never, ever, ever generate enough energy to pay for the energy it took to create them. The energy that it took to create them was 100% diesel driven. It was diesel trucks, it was steel mills, it was mining through diesel equipment, and so on and so on. It's called zero net sum accounting, okay?

And if you go through and you start at the very beginning and you add up all the energy costs of creating these giant fucking windmills, and then you look at how much energy they actually produce, you find that it's a loss right from the get go. We never should have made any of the fuckers. Wind is just too unreliable and it never generates. And these things are too unreliable, they're too unstable. Especially when you scale them up this way.

And then we start looking at the cost of destroying the windmills and we can't recycle them. That's the whole thing. When they go bad, they burn the fuck up. They put lithium out all over in the environment, they pollute the area they're in, they kill birds, and they don't generate energy. So ant may use vast quantities of energy just getting the fucker set up, not even their creation.

But just it is true that there are categories of windmills that have been placed that will never generate enough electricity to pay back the cost of placing them there, let alone building the fucker, right? So the placement of a giant windmill offshore takes so much energy in the form of hauling the thing, boats, stability, the building of the base, all of that, the windmill will never, ever last long enough to generate the energy that it took to put it there. This is also true of most photovoltaics, most of the solar panels, because those panels will never generate enough peak energy to pay for their own creation through their life cycle, because they use so much diesel to create them. They use so much diesel to extract the aluminum, all the oars, and all the metals and stuff in them and so on, that they'll never, ever, ever make back as much energy as it took to create the fuckers. And we can't get rid of them.

We can't do anything with them. In California, landfills right now are filling up with these things like mad, and they pollute the ground in a very dangerous way. To a certain extent, photovoltaic is as bad as nuclear waste. Worst in one way, because it's so spread out everywhere so that you can dump these things in almost any landfill. Whereas nuclear waste, you've got to have a permit to shove that stuff in a hole in the ground somewhere.

Anyway, you see that it is the incentivizing, okay? It was the reduction of the value of the purchasing power of the dollar that led the Central Bank to incentivize planned obsolescence through the governance control structures at the time, through 1933 through 1958. If you go and you look, you see the idea rises with management consultants, management design people. This was the flourishing of applying analysis to our corporate structures. And so we get people like Peter Drucker.

Now, none of these individuals that worked through that period of time were necessarily bad individuals, but there were only very few people like Lyndon Larouche who examined the concept of what we were doing and why, who understood that planned obsolescence only existed because of the Fern scam, because of the Federal Reserve debt note scam, and that was driving us this way. And here we are in 2022 at the ultimate end of it, when every fucking thing is crashing. And so our generations here are very lucky because we get to throw this thing out and start over and build clean from there on. And we can do it with some smarts because we now have the tools for analysis, the computers and all of this kind of stuff, right? And we're going to have a much larger, educated, awake population that will say, no, you get your central bank the fuck out of my country, that sort of thing, right?

Anyway, so this whole thing, though, the ecology of it all, is also why the Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, the mother Weffers (WEF Participants), the World Economic Forum, the UN, the global control matrix that is all over humanity is our greatest ecological threat. And it's a very immediate ecological threat because these fuckers think that the world's heating up, that we're going into climate change. Well, climate is change. We have weather day to day to day and it changes. And when we lump it all together, we call that climate.

Dumb motherfuckers. Dumb mother Weffer's (WEF Participants). They're trying to trick you, right? They're trying to say this is XYZ. And it's not.

That there is no rising global temperatures. In fact, we're going into a fucking ice age. We know this. The rivers are drying up, we're getting the lakes drying up. We're getting the rivers drying up in Europe, and Lake Meat is drying up because of lack of rainfall.

Well, why is that? Beyond the weather manipulation and all of that shit? Beyond all of that, there are general trends that go along with solar minimums in which we have increased Glaciation and glaciers formed by vast quantities of rain being over that area where it gets real cold and freezes. That means that rain is not over your usual area. Or that means in, like Europe, the rain that should be rain is coming down to snow and it's freezing up there and thus is not filling your rivers.

So there's this general trend that way, right? This is part of our climate, which is change. And we're going into an ice age. And the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) in charge of all of this shit are telling you that you're going into hot and balmy. No, it isn't happening.

And you cannot survive an ice age on windmills and photovoltaics. You need to have her key fucking diesel engines. Outputting as much as you can and digging deep for as much diesel as you can get. And this is part of the biosphere. This is what universe wants us to do, which we've gone into some of that in the past and we are going to have to go into a great deal as to how we actually fit in to the biosphere and how the mother whippers.

Have you been thinking about Malthus who is a limit to growth guy who was a pastor, not a scientist. He's a pastor. Vernonsky was not only a scientist, he was a historian of science and a real smart thinker. Malthus was manipulated by his circumstances. He's this English pastor fellow and he was promoted by the Wefers all the way through history because his growth limit model which is bogus.

It's absolutely non factual at any level but it's promoted as though it's a good working theory. It's being used by the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) to tell you guys, we've got overpopulation, we can't provide the food and we're destroying the earth and all this kind of stuff. All of that is horse shit, absolute delusional horseship that they're trying to get you to eat along with the bugs. These people are motherfucking evil all right. And they're motherfucking stupid.

They are peak stupidity for their own purposes as well. I mean they're just diluted. We'll go into that and probably in great detail at some point. Okay, so the rivers are drying up. The climate is in fact change.

It is weather changing. We're going into an ice age. Just the other day, on Monday, the Pacific Coastal Current changed. I watched it. It changed with some vigor.

Instead of a north to south flow, it's now south to north. And this is one of the signs that winter is approaching. Let's see, that would have been the 8th. So this is about 21 days earlier. Okay, so this is 21 days earlier than two years ago.

So the general trend is for the current to change earlier in August. And the issue is that when it changes, the current doesn't flow from north to south anymore. I'm talking about the water current out here. It flows from south to north. This cause this drag, so to speak, a reverse current of air across the top of it that heads north to south and brings all our weather in for the winter along the coast here which then feeds most of the continent.

And so we're going to have an early and sharp move into winter, quite certain. And it's probably going to be exceptionally wet. We have very few days of sun out here this summer anyway. So it's changed. The Pacific Current has changed and we're moving into winter again.

This winter is going to be really brutal and probably everybody except for the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) and those who are still listening to them is going to really get a little bit of a heads up that, oh, yeah, shit ain't right weather wise, and we're going to be experiencing a lot of different stuff and oh, maybe it's an ice age and not global heating, right? Global warming is what they used to call it. Yes. Their language changes in 1960. They said that sitting up here in Washington coast in the 1960s, they were telling us that it would be like California weather.

And I thought, Damn, that's cool, right? Not cool, that's warm. That's nice. We'll be able to grow oranges. We'll have lemons, avocado trees, this kind of stuff.

Now, it wouldn't be too good for California. It's all that warmth shifted up north along the beach because California at that point would be basically like the Baja Peninsula. It would all be 100% dried out. And Iguanas running around that kind of thing. Lizards and no humans could live there because it'd be just too fucking hot.

And so we haven't seen that. Also in 1960s, they told us that most of the low lying coasts around the whole planet would be underwater, and so we wouldn't have any waterfront property along on the ocean that would be safe and that big influxes of water would come up Louisiana and all these low lying places on the Southeast, and we'd have 100% altered coastline. Well, none of that shit's happened. Like I said, these mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) are stupid. We can go back and see what they said.

Anyway, let's see where we're at now. I got to get moving here. All right? So we're in this period of time when the peak of the loss of purchasing power is going to have its peak effect relative to our thinking about ecology. All right?

Now what the Woo people need to do is to understand that it's Vernadsky's biosphere that describes where we're really at and that also provides hints for what we need to be doing. And we need to be providing a whole lot more fucking energy to humanity because it's going to get really cold around here, and we've got to do things differently just to survive, to adapt. Rather not just to survive, because we will survive, and we are going to adapt and thrive here, and we're actually going to get rid of all these mother. Weifers all right, so in the last couple of things here, I've got to get moving. Pure sleep.

If you need to sleep, it'll also help you bulk up. It gives you the precursors that you need to have the maximum amount of human growth hormone in your body at night when you're sleep. And that's the only time the human growth hormone is usable. It manifests anyway. So just as a final note, obviously I'm aware of the raid on Trump.

This is one of these weeks where decades of shit happen, and this was a giant turning point for the normies. They're getting all whipped up. They're finally starting to understand some of this shit, and it's going to get a lot more intense at a news level because we're reaching the peaks of these battles with the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) as they go down. Every single person that knows about the World Economic Forum and thinks of them as an evil organization is one more victory for the good guys, one more person removed as a supporter of the mother weppers and who's over on the side of the opposition, which is humanity. Right?

Anyway, so that's basically it for this. Okay, so we've started the constitutional crises with the raid on Marlago, and we're going to get a couple of more here, all of which are going to be good relative to forcing this thing to a peak situation at the right time. So timing is critical and it's all coming down in this last 90 days. I think we're now what? It may be 89 days, 88 days until the midterms.

And so the pressure needs to really be brought up. So you'll see a lot more stuff being exposed as we go forward with the end of the Fed, right? Because that's what's happening. So we have a situation here when people say it's the ultimate battle of good versus evil. It's a situation of humanity can survive or the World Economic Forum can survive the global planetary control structure, not both.

So it's up to you guys. You got to make your choice at this stage.

**3850 Character Summary:**

**875 Character Summary:**

The document critiques the World Economic Forum (WEF) and central banks for their role in ecological threats. The diminishing purchasing power of the dollar since 1913 has led to economic challenges and the rise of planned obsolescence. This has caused a shift from glass to plastics, impacting the environment. The push for green energy solutions like windmills is criticized for inefficiency. The narrative of global warming is challenged, suggesting an impending ice age.

**95 Character Summary:**

Critique of WEF and central banks' ecological impact; challenges global warming narrative.

**Space-separated 35 Hashtag Keywords:**

**Comma-separated 35 Keywords:**

Ecology, Central Banks, WEF, Dollar, Purchasing Power, Planned Obsolescence, Glass, Plastic, Green Energy, Windmills, Solar Panels, Global Warming, Ice Age, Economic Challenges, Environment, Narrative, Critique, Inflation, Energy, Diesel, Biosphere, Malthus, Vernonsky, Governance, United Nations, Rothschilds, Economic Forum, Pollution, Recycle, Climate Change, Weather, Rainfall, Rivers, Lakes, Biosphere

**Ten Blog Post Titles:**

1. The Hidden Ecological Threats of Central Banks 🌍
2. WEF and the Global Governance: An Ecological Perspective 🌿
3. The Dollar's Decline: From Glass to Plastic 📉
4. Green Energy: Are Windmills Really the Future? 💨
5. Challenging the Global Warming Narrative: Are We Heading for an Ice Age? ❄️
6. The 2022 Perspective on Planned Obsolescence and its Impact
7. From Craftsmanship to Obsolescence: A Century's Shift
8. The 3 Major Environmental Missteps of the 21st Century 🌳
9. Decoding the Real Cost of Green Energy Solutions
10. The Role of Diesel in a World Pushing for Green 🛢️

**Key Takeaways:**

- Central banks, especially the World Economic Forum (WEF), are seen as major ecological threats.
- The purchasing power of the dollar has been degrading since 1913, leading to economic challenges.
- The rise of planned obsolescence has shifted consumer products from durable materials like glass to plastics.
- Green energy solutions, such as windmills, are criticized for their inefficiency and long-term ecological impact.
- The prevailing narrative of global warming is challenged, suggesting the world might be heading towards an ice age.

**Predictions from the PDF:**

- The world is heading towards an ice age, contrary to the prevailing global warming narrative.
- The purchasing power of the dollar will continue to degrade, leading to further economic challenges.
- The push for green energy solutions will not be sustainable in the long run due to their inefficiency.

https://chat.openai.com/share/87d25e0b-b5b9-48cb-bd11-dcec3a81745e

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump – 08-23-2023

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump - 08-23-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Ben Shapiro explains how censorship works

Episode Summary:

Debate Absence:

The discussion starts with Trump explaining his decision not to attend a Fox News debate in Milwaukee. He cites his significant lead in polls and feels it's unnecessary to be questioned by other candidates and a network he views as hostile. He draws parallels to his 2016 campaign experience.

Media Critique:

Trump discusses the decline of television, particularly targeting networks like MSNBC and CNN for what he perceives as a lack of credibility. He claims to have popularized the term "fake news" and suggests that "corrupt news" might be a more fitting description.

Candidates' Critique:

When probed about which candidates he believes shouldn't be running for president, Trump refrains from direct names but hints at individuals like Asa Hutchinson and Chris Christie. He critiques Christie's performance as New Jersey's governor and insinuates that Christie's resentment towards him is due to not receiving a position in Trump's administration.

Epstein's Death:

The conversation touches on the controversial death of Jeffrey Epstein. Trump expresses doubt about Epstein's suicide and criticizes former Attorney General Bill Barr for not conducting a thorough investigation into Epstein's death and the alleged 2020 election fraud.

Political Climate:

Trump reflects on the political atmosphere since his 2015 campaign. He describes a progression from organized protests against him to impeachment attempts. He voices concerns about potential threats to his safety, characterizing his adversaries as "savage animals."

International Relations:

Trump speaks positively about his rapport with global leaders like Kim Jong Un, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin. He believes they held him and the U.S. in higher regard during his tenure. He criticizes Joe Biden's physical and cognitive abilities, suggesting that Biden might not last until the next election. This sparks speculation about Kamala Harris or other potential Democratic contenders.

Debate with Biden:

The interview concludes with Trump reminiscing about his debate with Biden, which was moderated by Chris Wallace. He recalls confronting Biden about a $3.5 million payment from the mayor of Moscow's wife and expresses annoyance that Wallace intervened in the discussion.

#2020Election #AlBaghdadi #Appliances #Arkansas #Atlanta #BillBarr #Biden #California #CableNews #ChrisChristie #ChrisWallace #CNN #Comey #Congress #Conspiracy #conservatives #corrupt #COVID #CrookedJoe #Cuba #coup #debate #DeSantis #DemocratCities #DemocratParty #DistrictAttorney #DurhamReport #Election #ElectionFraud #ElectricCars #EPA #escalation #Fabrizio #FBI #FultonCounty #FoxNews #Georgia #government #HillaryClinton #Impeachment #indictment #inflation #InspectorGeneralHorowitz #Investigation #ISIS #JeffreyEpstein #JoeBiden #KamalaHarris #KimJongUN #Laptop #LosAngeles #MaraLago #McCaabe #McLaughlin #media #military #millions #MikePence #Moscow #MSNBC #NBC #NorthKorea #nuclearwar #Ohio #openborders #Olympics #PalmBeach #PanamaCanal #participated #pollnumbers #Polls #PresidentialRecordsAct #President #PresidentXi #Protests #Putin #Republican #Republicans #Rhinos #Ratings #rigged #Russia #SanFrancisco #senile #Singapore #Solomoni #SouthAmerica #SouthKorea #StaceyAbrams #Tariffs #ThomasJefferson #Tucker #USLeadership #Violence #VoterID #Washington #WaterRestrictors #Whirlpool #Wisconsin

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump - 08-23-2023

Mr. President, thanks for joining us. Thank you. Why aren't you at the Fox News debate tonight in Milwaukee? Well, you know, a lot of people have been asking me that and many people said you shouldn't do them.

But you see the polls have come out and I'm leading by 50 and 60 points and you know, some of them are at one and zero and two who. And I'm saying, do I sit there for an hour or 2 hours, whatever it's going to be, and get harassed by people that shouldn't even be running for president? Should I be doing that? And a network that isn't particularly friendly to me, frankly. They were back in Rhonda sanctimonious like crazy and now they've given up on him.

I mean, it's a lost cause. It reminded me very much of 2016. In 2016 I went through the same stuff and had to fight them all the way and then they became very friendly after I won, or just about when I was winning, but I just felt it would be more appropriate not to do the debate. I don't think it's right to do it if you're leading by 50, 60. I have one problem leading by 70 points and I'm saying why am I doing it?

And I'm going to have eight people, ten people, whoever made the debate. I don't know how many it is, but I'm going to have all these people screaming at me, shouting questions at me, all of which I love answering, I love doing, but it doesn't make sense to do them. So I've taken a pass, as you probably noticed. I'm grateful that you did. It's interesting though, because you spent a lot of your career in television.

You had a top show in television on NBC, but you don't feel the need now running for president to do television, obviously. Do you think television is declining? Well, according to a poll that I guess we just saw, it just came out where it's down like 30, 35%. But I think they were talking referring to cable. I think cable is down because it's lost credibility.

MSNBC or as they say, Ms DNC is so bad, it's so wrong what they write and what they do and what they say. It's fake news, as I said. I think I came up with that term, I hope I did because it's a good one. It's not tough enough anymore. It's corrupt know, really what you do is call corrupt news, but somehow that doesn't play as nicely.

But it is corrupt news. So you have MSNBC and you have CNN, who's absolutely doing no ratings at all. I mean they're dead, but they're doing none because they don't have credibility. They really don't have credibility. Fox is way down, as you know, and the good old days are long ago.

I will say this, it could come back, but they just don't have a lot of credibility, Tucker. You know that perhaps better than anybody. I think it was a terrible move getting rid of you. You were number one on television and all of a sudden we're doing this interview but we'll get bigger ratings using this crazy forum that you're using than probably the debate or competition. When you say there are people on stage who shouldn't be running for president, who do you mean?

Well, I don't want to really use names, but it wouldn't matter too much. A guy like I call him Ada Hutchinson. It's ASA, but I call him Ada. Why do you call him Ada? You know, I could tell you, but I don't want to get myself in a little trouble.

But he's weak and pathetic and I never understood the guy, never knew him. He was the governor of Arkansas. Not a very popular guy. I don't know how that state is such a great state. The people are so incredible in that state and they love me, and I love them.

How does this guy get elected governor of Arkansas? But he's nasty always and has been a guy like Chris Christie. The guy left with a 8% think of it 8% approval rating in New Jersey. Now he's running for president and he runs solely on the basis of let's Get Trump. He's like a savage maniac.

He's like a lunatic. And that's all he talks about. His poll numbers are very, very low. He's about 2%. What's he like?

You know him well. I've been friendly with him over the years, but I couldn't give him a job because I just never trusted him very much. I was just never one of his people that really trusted him. I never gave him the job. And that's one of the reasons he feels so hurt and so betrayed.

And I understand that. I really do. I understand it. But I never gave him he wanted to be different things. He was looking at different elements of the administration and we decided I decided just I didn't want to do it.

And now I'm glad I did because, you see but we had some great people. I had great people. We'll have even better people if we do this because now I know Washington. Before I didn't know Washington, but guys like Bill Barr were terrible. I mean, they were I would say Bushies.

I say that with respect to the Bush family, but they were Bushies. And it doesn't work out for us. It was clear. This is kind of far afield, but it was just interesting. I read Barr's account of his time.

He wrote a book about it, his autobiography, and in it he lies about Jeffrey Epstein's death. Clearly lies. Do you think Epstein killed himself? Sincerely? I don't know.

I will say know he was a fixture in Palm Beach. Yeah, I don't know what Barr said about it either. I have no idea what he said. What did he say he killed himself? Probably.

He said he killed himself and that they were going to do this investigation. They never did the investigation. It's never been public, and they hid it. And why are they doing that? Clearly, Barr knew, but why would Bill Barr be covering up the death of Jeffrey Epstein?

Bill Barr didn't do an investigation on the election fraud either. Okay? He said he did and he pretended he did, but he didn't. McSwain, the US attorney in Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said Barr just wouldn't let him do it was crazy. Barr became so petrified, so frightened of being impeached.

They were going to impeach him. I don't know if you remember it, it's not a big moment in history, but they said, we're going to impeach. They play a much rougher game. The left, the lunatics, and they were going to impeach Bill Barr and he was petrified. Now, how do you not get impeached?

Don't do any of this stuff. But he didn't do the job there. I don't know what he did with Epstein, but possibly do you think it's possible that Epstein was killed? Oh, sure, it's possible. I mean, I don't really believe I think he probably committed suicide.

He had a life with beautiful homes and beautiful everything, and all of a sudden he's incarcerated and not doing very well. I would say that he did, but there are those people, there are many people. I think you're one of them. Right. But a lot of people think that he was killed.

He knew a lot on a lot of people. He was killed. I think the closer you look I'm not a conspiracy person at all. I believe everything I hear. But, yeah, the closer you look into it I mean, the Attorney General of the United States, your Attorney general clearly lied about the Epstein death.

Yeah. Why? Certainly it wasn't well done. They had no cameras, they had no anything. Everybody was sleeping.

And a case could be made. Look, I'm not going to get involved in it, but I can tell you a case could be made either way, but it certainly wasn't the most well run place. So the reason I'm asking you is I'm looking at the trajectory since 2015 when you got into politics for real and then won. It started with protests against you, massive protests, organized protests by the left, and then it moved to impeachment twice. Right.

And now indictment. I mean, the next stage is violence. Are you worried that they're going to try and kill you? Why wouldn't they try and kill you? Honestly, they're savage animals.

They are people that are sick, really sick. You have great people in the Democrat Party. You have great people that are Democrats. Most of the people in our country are fantastic. And I'm representing everybody.

I'm not just Republicans or conservatives. I represent everybody. I'm the president of everybody. But I've seen what they do. I've seen the lengths that they go to when they make up the Russia, Russia, Russia when that's exposed and they go down and Barr should have gone after them and other people should have gone after and they did very late because the Durham report came out.

It was fairly good. It could have been a lot tougher, I guess, but it was fairly good. But it explained how corrupt it was. I'll tell you who did a great job was the Inspector General Horowitz. He did a phenomenal report.

You didn't have to go to Durham. He did it on comey and on, I guess McCabe and some others and it was a vicious it was basically a true report how bad they are. But these people are sick people. These are people that I think they hate our country. You want to know the truth when you see open borders, when you see these policies that they have and so many other things, it's so sad to see we have a country that's very fragile right now.

I've never seen I will say, look, I ran in 16, which was 15, but I ran in 16 election in 16 and there was tremendous spirit in 20. There was even more spirit. We got many millions of we got millions and millions more votes. It wasn't even a contest. People said, well, what do you think of 20?

I said, we did much better. We did. You got to base it on the number of votes. We got many more votes in 20 than we did in 16. But the election was rigged.

It was a rigged election and with COVID they use COVID to cheat a lot of different things and we have so much on it. It's like so easy. But we had judges that didn't want to look, we had people didn't want to get involved. She's a conspiracy theorist. If you say anything about the election but I have never seen spirit like there is right now even coming down here, just the people on the road that are just absolutely going crazy.

And the reason is I think they like me and I know they love my policies. I hope they like me too. A lot of people say they don't like me, but they like my I think they like me. But I have never seen spirit like it is right now. And the reason is because Crooked Joe Biden is so bad.

He's the worst president in the history of our country. I don't think he's going to make it to the gate, but you never know. But he's a corrupt person. So corrupt that I took the name off know I don't do two people at one time. I took the Crooked Hillary and I made it.

I retired the net. That was a good day for her. I bet she was very happy. And I used it for Joe because it's Crooked Joe, but Joe is really but you don't think he's going to make it to November of 20. Well, I think he's worse mentally than he is physically and physically.

He's not exactly a triathlete or any kind of an athlete. You look at him. He can't walk to the helicopter. He walks he can't lift his feet out of the grass. It's only two inches at the white house, right?

It's not a lot, but you watch him, and it looks like he's walking on toothpicks. And then you see him in the beach where he can't lift a chair. You know those chairs are meant to be light, right? They're like, 2oz lift them up. He can't lift the chair.

He can't walk to the chair. And I don't know what they're doing with the beach. This beach is seeming to play a big role, but they love pictures of him on the beach. I think he looks terrible on the beach. Looks terrible on the beach.

Skinny legs. Well, he can't walk through the sand. Sand is not that easy to walk through, but when he walks through it, he can't walk through the sand. And there's somebody in there that thinks he looks fabulous at the beach. I think he looks horrible at the beach.

Plus, the beach doesn't represent what a president's supposed to be doing. He's supposed to be working. He's supposed to be getting us out of that horrible, horrible war that we're very much involved in with Russia and Ukraine. You could do that. You could do that very easily, I believe you could do that very I don't believe he could do it because he's just incompetent.

But that's a war that should end immediately, not because of one side or the other, because hundreds of thousands of people are being killed. Can you imagine you're in an apartment house, and rockets are going into that building and blowing it up and knocking it down? And why should anybody? Human beings is a human, whether they're Russian or Ukrainian or whatever they are. It's got to be stopped, and it can be stopped very easily.

It would have never started if I were president. It would have never started. So back to biden. I'm interested. So you think he's failing?

He obviously is failing. I think it's clear to everybody. But that would make Kamala Harris the candidate. Well, not really. I mean, I guess they'd have maybe a free for all.

A lot of people say she has to remain, for certain reasons, the candidate. She has to I don't think that's true, actually. I don't think that other people would stand for it. She has some bad moments. Her moments are almost as bad as his.

I think his are worse, actually. Yeah, she seems pretty senile, too. She speaks in rhyme. It's weird. It's weird.

But she has bad moments in rhyme. Well, the way she talks the bus will go here, and then the bus will go there, because that's what buses do. It's weird. The whole thing is weird. This is not a president of the United States future.

And I think they probably have some kind of a primary and other people will get could be. I always got along well with him, believe it or not, but could be him. Could be somebody else. He's got a big load on his shoulders because you look at California, what's happened, but I don't know if the American people really the people that vote for him, I don't even know if they know. You look at so many of the things that are going on and people don't seem to be in the old days, if you had a bad record, it meant a lot.

Today, if you have a bad record, it doesn't really mean know. He looks good. He's a nice looking guy, speaks well, but Biden, every time you watch him talking, it's like he's walking on eggs. You're waiting for him to collapse. And he almost always does.

And I got to know the leaders of all of the countries, essentially, but the big ones and the bigger the tougher, the know, it's like sort of I guess maybe that's the way it's supposed to be. But I got to know President Xi of China and Putin and Kim Jong UN. North Korea did a great job with North Korea, kept us out of a nuclear war. We would have 40,000 dead soldiers right now. They'd drop a nuke right on top of the military base.

But we have 40,000 soldiers over there. And I did great. I got along with them great. That's a positive. The press said he said nice things about Kim Jong UN.

I also said horrible things at the beginning. Horrible enough that he wanted to talk and we talked and we met in Singapore. We met actually twice, and we had unbelievable meetings. I know him very well. We were in great shape with him.

What do you think he and Xi and Putin think of Biden? I think they can't believe it. I think they probably say this is some kind of a know. They had great respect for our country. They respected me.

They had great respect for our country when I was there, every one of them. Look, if you go to North Korea, you take a look at what know. The Olympics was dead. South Korea spent billions on the Olympics. Nobody was going to go.

They didn't want to get blown up. They called me and they said, we are going to let the Olympics proceed. This is North Korea. I said, you should go into the Olympics, put your athletes in. It wasn't know, they were big on athletes know, famine.

But they went in and they actually participated. And within about two days, the entire thing was sold out. And if it wasn't me, that would have never happened. But I got along very well with him and that's a positive thing. He does have massive nuclear power by the way, and if Hillary would have gotten in, or if the Obama thought process continued, it would have been a nuclear war.

Absolutely. With North Korea, he was expecting to go into a war, and it would have been a nuclear war. So do you think the rest of the world looks on at Biden and thinks someone else has got to be running the government? Well, somebody else has to be. I don't think he's capable of doing anything.

Look, when I debated him, I said, how come? And this was in front of probably not a friend of yours, Chris Wallace. He was the moderator, not a friend. I said, Why is it he wants to be Mike, but he doesn't have the talent? It's one of those bitchy little man.

He wanted to be his father, but he didn't have the talent of his father was great. His father little fussy man. His father interviewed me in 60 Minutes. It was actually a ten. Can you believe his father had talent?

At least I may have been the only guy that he gave a good 60 Minutes to. He was rough, really. Father was tough. He was great, though. He was great at what he did.

But Chris Wallace was so upset, he was guarding this guy who wouldn't do a show. By the way, I didn't mind Chris Wallace because he wouldn't do Biden, wouldn't do a show, and it was very obvious. He kept asking him and asking, but he wouldn't do the show. So I figured he's got to like me. But he came from a different planet.

But remember when I asked the question, why is it that the mayor of Moscow's wife is allowed to give you three and a half million dollars? Don't forget, that was brought up now. It's brought up all the time, but that was brought up by me long before anyone ever heard of it. I said, the mayor of Moscow's wife giving you three and a half million dollars. What did you do to deserve three and a half million dollars to Biden?

And Chris Wallace said, this has nothing to do with the debate. He got in the way of the question. No. Well, it was crazy. And I said, well, wait a minute.

He got three and a half million from the mayor of Moscow's wife. Now, people forget that, but if you go back and take a look, you will see. And Chris Wallace didn't want me to ask that question. I said, I think it's a very appropriate question. It turned out to be much more appropriate than people thought.

Amazing. So do you have a preference in assuming you're the Republican nominee and all goes as you plan it to go? Do you have a preference in who you run against? In many ways, I'd love to run against him because his record is so bad. It's still horrible when you look at inflation, everything else.

But others also have very bad records. I mean, California is a bad record. So should it be Gavin, or should it be somebody else? When I look at San Francisco, what's happened to that incredible city that was one of the greatest cities in the world just a short while ago, and now it's very sad when you look at it. Los Angeles, every city, practically all the Democrat run cities, you know, Republican run cities are doing very nicely because they arrest people when you have crimes, and they don't go after political candidates because they think it's know.

I mean, it's been amazing. My poll numbers are the highest they've ever, but because people understand can I ask you that gets back to my original question. So if the protest didn't work, you got elected anyway. Impeachment didn't work twice. Obviously, indictment is not working.

Your poll numbers go up. When they raided Mar a Lago in August of last year, your numbers went up. They can indict you 20 times, and you're not going to lose the Republican primary because of that. Well, it makes it look even more ridiculous. I mean, the four indictments, and maybe there'll be more.

I don't know. These people are crazy, but they're counterproductive. So if you chart it out, it's an escalation is what I'm saying. So what's next? After try to put you in prison for the rest of your life?

That's not working. So don't they have to kill you now? I think the people of our country don't get enough credit for how smart they are, and I'm not sure I would have said this ten years ago, but they get it. They really get it. When somebody gets indicted, your poll numbers go down.

When somebody gets indicted, you announce, ladies and gentlemen, I'll be leaving to spend time with my family and to fight for the rest of my life on this stuff. But you're out of politics. I got indicted four times. All trivia nonsense. Bullshit.

It's all bullshit. It's horrible. When you look and you look at what they're doing, the boxes, hoax, I'm covered by the Presidential Records Act. I'm allowed to do exactly that. He's not covered, and he's got 25 times the number of boxes, and he's got them stored in Chinatown.

He's got him stored in a Flimsy garage underneath his Corvette at Penn. And by the way, at Penn, he gets millions of dollars. China pays this guy millions of dollars. See, I think he's the most corrupt president we've ever had, and he also has the distinction of being the most incompetent. And I believe both I mean, he's both incompetent and corrupt.

I actually believe he's compromised because China knows so much about him. They know where the money comes from. They know where it is, who paid it, and they probably paid it well, they do pay penn, and he gets a million dollars. I think he takes $999,000 because it keeps it a little bit under a million like, by a dollar. But he, in many ways, is a Manchurian candidate.

We have a Manchurian candidate. And he's afraid to tell Russia to get out of Cuba. He's afraid to tell China to get out of Cuba. China now is building. Think of this.

China's building military installations in Cuba. The Cuban population of Miami is not too happy because they're never going to be able to go back. And you don't even hear about it. And the worst culprit is the press, the media. Because normally when I first heard that that China is building installations in Cuba and installations means military, you know, they said, just some communication.

They did that on the islands with Japan. They took the island, they started this massive construction. And they told everybody, including the Japanese. The Japanese have to be very careful. They told everybody that this is a housing development.

They got to build a housing development. And I said, how come the runway is 20,000ft long? Private jets need 4000ft. They don't need 20,000ft. The big ones need 20,000ft.

They don't even need 20. And I looked at the runway, I said, that's the largest runway ever built, both in width and length for housing development. There's nobody that has a plane that big that you would have a runway. That's why allowed to conduct imperialism in our hemisphere. Well, yeah.

And it's far beyond Cuba. It's all over South America. Yeah, in the Caribbean. So we built a thing called the Panama Canal. We lost 35,000 people to the mosquito.

Malaria. We lost 35,000 people building. We lost 35,000 people because of the mosquito. Vicious. They had to build under nets.

It was one of the true great wonders of the world. As he said. One of the nine wonders of the world. No, it was one of the seven. This happened a little while ago, you know, says nine wonders of the world.

You could make nine wonders. He would have been better off if he stuck with the nine and just said, yeah, I think it's nine. But this is one of the true seven wonders of the world. And you take a look at the Panama Canal. It was such an incredible engineering marvel.

We sold it under Jimmy Carter. We sold it to Panama for $1. The following day, they quadrupled the amount of money that ships had to pay to get across. They didn't lose one ship. And now they've made it much bigger.

And now they've widened it. They've doubled it, right? They've more than doubled it. And it's one of the most profitable things anytime. It's just incredible.

Right. We gave it away for $1. China now controls it. They actually control the Panama Canal. They run it.

They control it. And we shouldn't let that happen. And we can't let China be in Cuba. And they'll get out. If I'm president, they'll get out.

Because I had a very good relationship with President Xi, but he respected this country. He respected me and he'll get out. And we can't let them run the Panama Canal. We built the Panama Canal should have never been given to Panama. We should have had it, but we gave it for $1.

Think of it, they quadrupled in one day. They lifted the fees, which know, pretty big for these massive ships to go through, right? Rather than going around the Cape and all the tremendous storms. Such beauty, such know, when you it's beautiful stuff, but you didn't want to get caught in those storms. Those were storms that wiped out the biggest ships.

And we go through the Panama Canal. We built it and we gave it away for $1. Think of that. How stupid are we? We have done the stupidest things in this country and now we have a president that can't put two sentences together, can't speak, can't walk, can't talk.

I don't think he gets to the starting gate. But these people do miracles. I mean, he ran out of his basement and you got away with that one because of COVID So he sort of got away with it. They cheated on the election. But you have people that are very smart, but they're fascists and they're radical left lunatics, and they're destroying our country with the all electric cars and the windmills all over the place, which, by the way, don't work.

And they're all most of made in China, for the most part. They're made in China. Germany a little bit, but China. But you look at what's happening to our country. Even no voter ID.

I mean, why don't they want voter ID? There's only one reason they don't want voter ID. Because they want to cheat. Who doesn't want, you know, the Democrat Convention, the last one, they had voter ID that was this big. It looked like a prison card, this big on their chest.

You walked in, they had your picture, your this, your fingerprint. They owed everything. The most incredible voter ID I've ever seen. That was to get into the Democrat National Convention, but to get into vote. If you buy groceries, if you buy practically anything now, you have ID on a card, credit cards or otherwise.

But don't you think it's racist to have to show your ID? Well, they probably say that they use anything not to show ID, because voter ID is pretty simple. And we could go back and we should go back to all paper ballots. Voter ID. Same day voting.

You know, France did it. France had mail in ballots and it was terrible. Anytime you have mail in ballots, you're going to have massive cheating on your elections. Anytime. Not just the presidential election.

Anytime you have isn't that the whole point of oh, yeah, sure, it's the whole point. That's their whole point. They want to cheat. Yeah, they have to cheat because their policies are so bad that if they didn't cheat, they couldn't get elected. Who.

Wants open borders, who wants high taxes, who wants high interest rates, who wants to not be able to use a gas stove or have to drive an electric car, which you have a four hour drive, but the car only goes an hour and a half. You have to charge it. The happiest moment for somebody in an electric car is the first ten minutes. In other words, you get it charged. And now for ten minutes, the unhappiest part is the next hour, because you're petrified that you're not going to be fined to another charger.

I'm not knocking electric cars. They're fine. They're fine. But if people want to buy a gasoline car or hybrid hybrids are pretty good, actually, but they should be allowed to buy. They don't want to do any of this.

So right now, California is in a big brownout because their grid is a disaster. The grid all over the country is sort of a disaster, but the grid in California and yet they want to have, in a very short period of time, millions and millions of cars going off that grid. Essentially, it doesn't work. So plug your car into a grid that's fake. You should be able to buy an electric car.

Electric cars could be fine. If you drive short distances and you want to have whatever and you have plugins everywhere you go, they could be fine. But you got to have gasoline cars. You got to have everything. Let people buy everything.

Now, the new thing is your heating systems in the house, they don't want you to have a modern day heating system. They want you to use a heating system that will cost you at least $10,000 to buy and won't work very well. None of the stuff works as well. One of the things I did with EPA is you have states, many states, most of the states have so much water it comes out of heaven, right? The water pours down and you have it.

It's there. It's got to go wherever it goes, into the oceans, whatever. It's not like a big problem. Now, in some states, they have a problem. You have some desert areas and all, and for that it's okay.

But they have sinks where no water comes out. You turn it on, no water comes out. No water comes out of the shower. No water is allowed to go into the washing machine for your dishes or for your clothing. And I avoided all of that.

Wait, they have sinks where no water comes out. You have restrictors when I say no water, very little water. You want to wash your hands, right? Yeah. And you've seen this, and you turn on the sink and it's very little.

Or do you want to wash your beautiful hair, right? And you're standing under a shower. Then the suds never go. The water comes out very slowly. I'm sure you've seen this.

It usually takes place in new hotels. And new homes. Yeah, you take a drill and take the well, you can, but now they make it, so you can't do that. So is league. They have a restrictor.

It's called a restrictor, and it restricts the water from coming out. So I ended all of that. And you have to see these. They let the water come out. You know what people do?

They wash their hands like five times longer or in the washing machine, they'll press for their, let's say the dishwasher. They'll press it, then they'll press it about seven or eight times. They'll end up using more water, and it still won't be very good. I met with the head of Whirlpool. They were practically going out of business during my administration, and they said to me from Ohio, credible, great state, I love Ohio.

And they were really doing badly because people were dumping washing machines all over, mostly from South Korea, but also from China. And he was explaining it's just a terrible situation. I said, Let me ask you, how's the quality? He says, we're better, but they are good enough quality. But of course he's going to say that, but they are better.

He said, but they don't allow us they're dumping these machines, they're cutting us in half, they're killing us. And on top of it, the government won't let us use water in our machines. I mean, he shows me, like a quarter of a bottle of water that's supposed to be washing clothing, and I freed it all up. And I put tariffs on these countries that were selling and the machines coming into the country, and that company went from all the washing machine companies, they make washing machines, they make dryers, they make all of the different machines that do this kind of work, including dishwashers. And they went from a disaster area to being just thriving.

But can I ask, they love me in that part of Ohio. Well, I bet they do. But why should EPA no one at EPA was elected by anybody. Why do they have the power to decide how much water your washing machine uses? Shouldn't Congress, in a democracy, get to vote on that?

Yeah, you could say that. They do things that are not very that's my you. If you get elected again, go back to Washington. How do you keep the agencies under control? How do you keep FBI and CIA specifically under control?

The way you do it? Like, I fired Comey. That was a big deal. A lot of people said, and I fired them very early. Somebody said, oh, I wish you would have fired them.

There's a real question about firing them anyway, you understand? Because when they have a ten year term, there is a question. I fired Comey. That was a great thing. If I didn't fire Comey, maybe I wouldn't be talking to you, or I'd be talking to you about real estate or something else other than politics, right?

That was a coup. In my opinion. That was a very sick deal. That was the insurance policy. You remember the insurance policy?

Oh, she's going to win, darling. She's going to win. But just in case she doesn't, we have an insurance policy. An insurance policy. She was what they were doing, and we caught them with that.

That was a very important tweet, or whatever it was text. It was a big deal. That was a big deal. The insurance policy, she's going to win 100 million to one. That's not good odds.

At least they gave me one, right? 100 million to one. But just in case she doesn't win, we have an insurance policy. And everybody said, that's strange, that's strange. But we caught all that because I fired, call me.

Because when I fired, call me. It was like throwing a rock into a hornet's nest, into a nest of bees, and the place went crazy. So when you were president, are you confident that you knew everything, say, CIA was doing around? No, I'm not. It's a very interesting group of people.

I had very good relationships, I thought, but I was a little surprised when I got out. Know, things go on. Look it's, what were you surprised by? I was surprised, I think, at some of the people. I was surprised that I had a group of people we killed, many using the CIA, I have to say this bad, very bad actors.

We were very good at it. You look at Solomoni, you look at Al Baghdadi, bigger than Osama bin Laden. I mean, Osama bin Laden. But Al Baghdadi did. ISIS.

And he was rebuilding ISIS very strongly. And that was the CIA that did that. That was really us that did that. That was really us that did that. And Solomoni was us that did that.

Not so much CIA, but we did some very good work with the CIA. But I started you know, when I looked at the 51 intelligence agents saying that the laptop from hell was Russia disinformation, when I took a look at that, I said, that's a horrible thing. They knew it wasn't. They knew it was not. And by the way, you're talking about cheating on the election.

McLaughlin and Fabrizio, great pollsters, they said a thing like that, plus other things, meant anywhere from ten to 17% of the vote would change. Whatever happened to Mike Pence? You've always been nice to Pence. I've never heard you criticize Pence. You've defended him in public many, many times.

He's out there attacking you. What is that? So Mike wants to run for president. You got to understand, in my opinion, mike Pence had the absolute right to send the votes back to the legislatures, the Democrats. And everybody said, you don't have the right.

In other words, I said, Is he a human conveyor belt? You mean if he finds fraud in Pennsylvania, in Georgia, in any of these states, arizona, he has to send them to Mitch McConnell, right? That's right, sir. Well, if he finds fraud, he has said so. He's just so he's a conveyor belt, boom, put him in.

I said, I don't agree with that. And we had some lawyers not all, we had some lawyers that said, no, you do have the right to send them back to the legislatures to be rechecked. Because if you looked at what went on in Wisconsin, who, by the way, now agree with me, wisconsin has been virtually other than the fact they're not allowed to do anything statutorily, but Wisconsin has mean what they found is incredible. I mean, we won Wisconsin, but Mike Pence had the right, in my opinion, to send the best do you ever talk to him now? No, I haven't spoken to him in a long time.

I was very disappointed in him. I didn't want to do what Thomas Jefferson did. Thomas Jefferson, it was Georgia, and it was here, ye hear, the great state of Georgia is not capable or allowed to tabulate their votes. And Thomas Jefferson, who was the vice president, said, is Georgia sure that they cannot tabulate their votes? Georgia is sure he didn't send it back and have them redo it.

He said, we will keep the votes of the great state of Georgia for Thomas Jefferson and his president. I didn't ask him for that. Could have done that too, but I thought that would bring turmoil. I asked him to send them back to his legislature, to the know in Wisconsin, let's say. But why didn't he?

I mean, you'd worked together for four years, you're the president, he's VP, you say you're aligned on everything. I think he got very bad advice, I really do. Now, let me tell you what happened. I sat there with a few people. I think his lawyer was in the room too.

His lawyer was very much against it. There were other lawyers that felt you could do it. It was one of those things. I think you could have done it. I think you can always do something if you see fraud or if you see problems.

But it's very interesting. So after the election was over, the Rhinos got together with the Democrats and they redid the election so you couldn't do it anymore. So then I called the people, I said, So in other words, you're saying I was right, you could do it. Yes, you could do it. In other words, they took the Voting act and they redid it so the vice president no longer has the power to do what I said he could do.

So when that happened, I said, wow. And you'd look some of these Democrats in the eye and they'd say, he has absolutely no right to do it. And immediately after the election, they met Rhinos, Kadema Maul and Democrats, and they approved legislation that takes away the right of the vice president to do it. So I said, ah, so you're saying I was right. The vice president did have the right to do it, and they said, yes, he did.

So if you're saying they stole it from you last time, why wouldn't they do the same this time? Oh, well, they'll try. They're going to be trying. Yeah, and not only me. Look, DeSantis is out.

I think he's gone. So he was at a level, people have figured him out, he's gone. But if somebody else got in other than me, they'll go at him just as viciously as they did me. These people are sick. They will go after them.

And a lot of people say they won't be able to hold up. I do get credit for holding up quite well, I must tell you. I think it's how do you do that? How do you get indicted every week and stay cheerful? I think it's a lot easier because I'm so high in the polls, because it means the people get it.

The people see it's a fraud. The people see it like this horrible district attorney from just a little while ago, from essentially Atlanta, that's Fulton County, she said, basically, I don't have any right to challenge an election. Well, what about Stacey Abrams? What about Hillary Clinton? What about all of these Democrats that are still challenging my election?

The same people that are saying he's challenging an election challenged my election, and they did it with Slates. They did it with all sorts of things. They were very bad, very bad about it. But basically they're suing me. And they're saying, you don't have any right to challenge, and if you challenge an election, we're going to indict you and put you in jail.

So what they're doing is they've weaponized and don't kid yourself, the DOJ and Biden and the whole group, they're watching all of this stuff. They love the local stuff. The DA in Manhattan, not only that, they put one of the DOJ top people into the Manhattan DA's office to run things. They don't even have a case against me. It's not even a case.

Everyone says, even the Democrats say, you can't bring these cases. You have no case. The attorney General or the district attorney. Fanny, fanny Willis in Atlanta, she's getting killed, basically. She's saying Trump doesn't have the right to criticize an election.

But you've been around long enough now. You've seen many elections criticized. I mean, Hillary Clinton goes crazy every time she talks. She says he's not the president. Jimmy Carter said he's not the president.

Well, I am the president. Hillary Clinton called me, by the way, 302 in the morning to congratulate me the night of the election. Did her voice crack? Well, her voice was very different. I will say I won't get into that.

But what do you mean, her voice was very different? Don't forget, they were all celebrating at 05:00 in the afternoon, and I came home. And I said, I think we won. I felt we won because the rallies are so big. We'd go to Wisconsin and we'd go to Georgia, we'd go to different states in Michigan, we'd have rallies in Pennsylvania, we had 58,000 people in Butler.

And I'd said, how are we losing this? How do you have a rally where you have from 50 to 100,000 people, many of them united, seven a day for a couple of days? That's a lot. That's a lot. These are big rallies, too.

And I didn't hold back. I didn't say, let's make them little, let's do abbreviations, right? But they challenged this stuff. Hillary called me up and conceded. Now, the word is that Obama said you have to do that, but she called up and totally conceded.

But now every time you see her on television, she's saying like, well, she's challenging the election, so that would mean that she should be indicted, but that would mean also that Stacey Abrams in Georgia should be indicted because she still thinks she won the election for governor. She still thinks that she's never recanted. Do you think Stacey Abrams will be indicted for that? No, of course not. She won't be.

The Democrats don't get indicted for things like that. They don't get impeached. No, it's a different thing. With that being said, yes, I had great support when they did impeachment hoax number one and impeachment hoax number two. Jim Jordan.

The House was fantastic, and actually, the Senate was very good for me, other than Mitch McConnell. I think if he had, it's too bad. I endorsed him. He was begging, he was going to lose that race, and I endorsed him. And he ended up winning the race because of my endorsement.

He was down. He was going to lose to Amy McGrath. She was $90 million in cash, all set to go. She was leading by three. He was going down.

I did him a favor, and then three, four months later, he really wanted to impeach me. He's a bad guy, but if you look at what's going on politically, so interesting, the level of loyalty is different in politics than it is in normal life. I will say, with that being said, I've had great loyalty also. But the house was fantastic. The Senate was very know.

They overrode Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell, in my opinion, was trying to get senators to impeach me, especially for the second one. And on the first one, he acted very, very slow. He should have gone much faster. But Mitch McConnell wanted to and the senators went up to guys that are subservient to him because he gives know, he gives them money, he gives them a lot of money.

He raises some money and he gives it to him, and therefore they do what he said. That's the only form of leadership he's got. So, last question. If you're elected president again, what's your top, your number one priority. When you ran last time, you said, I will build a wall.

This time, your bottom line, top promise to the so you can do numerous things at the same time, of course, but let's say number one is a border and taking hundreds of thousands of criminals that have been allowed into our country and getting them out and bringing them back to their country. Guatemala, by the way, not only the four countries that we think of as neighbors all over the world. Last month we had 149 countries represented. Think of it, we had 149 countries represented, Tucker, from places that many people never even heard of coming into our country. And they're coming in from mental institutions, and they're coming in from prisons.

They're emptying out their prisons all over South America. They're emptying out their mental institutions. Terrorists are pouring into our country. We have no idea. I had the strongest border in the history of our country, and I built almost 500 miles of wall.

They like to say, oh, was it less? No, I built 500 miles. In fact, if you check with the authorities on the border, we built almost 500 miles of wall. And I had another 200 that I was going to build. It's like water, it seeks, and we're going to build another 200.

We built it, it was all set to go. All they had to do is install it. It would have taken three weeks. And that's when I found out. I said, I think these people actually want open borders.

The first thing I would do would be I would seal up the border good and tight, except for people that want to come in legally. Do you think we're moving towards civil war?

There's tremendous passion and there's tremendous love. January 6 was a very interesting day because they don't report it properly. I believe it was the largest crowd I've ever spoken before. And you know, some of the crowds I've spoken before, and like, July 4 on the mall, I think they had a million people there. But I think that the biggest crowd I've ever spoken before was on January 6.

And people that were in that crowd, a very, very small group of people, and we said patriotically and peacefully. Peacefully and patriotically, right? Nobody ever says that go peacefully and patriotically. But people that were in that crowd that day, very small group of people went down there. And then there are a lot of scenarios that we can talk about, but people in that crowd said it was the most beautiful day they've ever experienced.

There was love in that crowd. There was love and unity. I have never seen such spirit and such passion and such love. And I've also never seen simultaneously and from the same people, such hatred of what they've done to our country. So do you think it's possible that there's open conflict?

We seem to be moving towards something. I don't know because I don't know what it you know, I can say this. There's a level of passion that I've never seen, there's a level of hatred that I've never seen, and that's probably a bad combination. Donald Trump. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Very much. Thank you. That is a bad combination, by the way. Bad combination.

Thank you.

Episode Summary:

The text discusses the novelty theory and the work of Russian scientist Kozyrev, who focused on the nature of time. After spending ten years in a Siberian gulag, he developed experiments in the 60s that led to the observation that time exhibits aspects of pressure. This pressure builds up to a threshold before manifesting a result, a pattern that repeats in various aspects of reality, such as the stock market, heartbeat, and chemical reactions. The text emphasizes that this understanding of time's pressure-like behavior can be applied to various fields, including linguistics, and is a fundamental aspect of our reality.

The text explores the concept of building tension and release in various contexts, including chemical reactions, language, human interactions, and societal dynamics. It emphasizes how this pattern can be observed in individual behaviors, such as a fight between two people, or on a larger scale, like potential civil unrest. The author also connects this idea to novelty theory and the Yuga cycles, suggesting that humanity is entering a new age where increased energy from the Galactic Center will lead to an "up-leveling" of human consciousness and technology. The text concludes with a hopeful outlook on humanity's potential growth and evolution.

The text discusses the transition from the Kali Yuga (Iron Age) to the Bronze Age, emphasizing an up-leveling of complexity and novelty production. It contrasts the simplicity of life 500 years ago with today's interconnected world and predicts another significant uptick in complexity. The author explains the Yuga cycles, including the transition periods, and asserts that humanity is 25 years into a 75-year transition to the Bronze Age. The text also criticizes the Khazarian Mafia for attempting to suppress this advancement and predicts a short-lived hyperinflation period. The author concludes that the transition to a new age is inevitable.

The text explores the shift from building tension language to release language, reflecting a change in societal dynamics. It discusses the increasing complexity and novelty in various aspects of life, such as parts shortages and the potential for on-demand production through 3D printing. The author emphasizes the transition into a new era marked by decentralized and diversified solutions, predicting that this trend will continue for the next 2100 years. The text concludes with the idea that the universe rewards novelty creation, and individuals can benefit from understanding and adapting to these changes.

Insidious Meme

Kondratiev's Revenge - 02-28-2024

Related posts:

Previous Blog Posts:

Speculation Vs Investment - 01-03-2023

Related posts: