Episode Summary:

Wallis and Biglino delve into the etymology and usage of "Elohim" in the Bible, highlighting inconsistencies and anomalies in traditional translations. They emphasize the importance of understanding the ancient texts' original meanings without theological bias, suggesting that Elohim might refer to multiple entities or beings with significant power. The scholars point out that the term is plural and often associated with verbs in the plural form, conflicting with the singular notion of God in monotheistic traditions. They argue that a literal, uninterpreted translation of ancient texts reveals a different narrative than the commonly accepted one, potentially altering our understanding of human origins and the nature of divinity.

#Elohim #Bible #Translation #AncientTexts #Divinity #Monotheism #Polytheism #PowerfulBeings #Mythology #Theology #Hebrew #Interpretation #HumanOrigins #Cosmos #Pluralism #Scriptures #ChristianOrthodoxy #Anomalies #TranslationChoices #Linguistics #GrammaticalRules #SacredTexts #ChurchDoctrine #CulturalMemory #MasoreticHebrew #Phoenician #SemiticLanguages #BiblicalAnomalies #ChurchPolitics #MoralQuestions #TheologicalBias #HistoricalContext #ScholarlyDebate #BiblicalNarratives #DivineCouncil

Key Takeaways:

Elohim might not refer to a singular God but a collection of powerful entities.
Traditional translations of the Bible may have obscured the original meanings due to theological biases.
Reexamining the term Elohim with a literal approach to ancient texts reveals a drastically different narrative.
The plural form of Elohim and its associated verbs challenge the monotheistic interpretation.
Understanding the original context and meaning of biblical words is crucial for a complete understanding of the texts.
The scholarly work of Paul Wallis and Mauro Biglino opens up a discussion on cultural memory and the potential misinterpretations made over centuries.

Key Takeaways:

Elohim as a Plural Term:

Traditional View: Elohim is singular in context, referring to the one monotheistic God.
Authors' Argument: Elohim is plural, often used with plural verbs, suggesting it refers to multiple entities or "powerful ones" rather than a singular omnipotent deity.
Translation and Interpretation:

Traditional View: Biblical translations and interpretations have been consistent and accurate, reflecting the divine and infallible nature of the texts.
Authors' Argument: Translations are often influenced by theological bias, and a literal translation without interpretation reveals a different narrative, especially concerning the word Elohim.
Nature of Divinity:

Traditional View: The Bible speaks of a singular, omnipotent, and omniscient God.
Authors' Argument: The text, when taking into account the original meanings and usages of words like Elohim, suggests a more complex picture that could involve a council or assembly of powerful beings, not a singular God.
Biblical Anomalies and Inconsistencies:

Traditional View: Apparent anomalies and inconsistencies are either symbolic or can be explained within the theological framework.
Authors' Argument: Many of these anomalies and inconsistencies, especially related to Elohim, are due to mistranslations or misinterpretations over time, reflecting a different story when corrected.
Hebrew Language and Its Implications:

Traditional View: The Masoretic Text and other traditional Hebrew texts have preserved the true meaning of the original scriptures.
Authors' Argument: Understanding Hebrew, particularly its evolution and the original context, is crucial. The authors argue that the Hebrew language, particularly its reconstruction in the Masoretic Text, might not accurately reflect the original texts' meanings.
Theological Implications:

Traditional View: The theological implications of the Bible are clear and centered on monotheism and the worship of a singular God.
Authors' Argument: The traditional theological implications might be a result of interpretational errors. The actual implications might challenge or broaden our understanding of the divine and human origins.
Cultural and Historical Context:

Traditional View: The Bible is a document that transcends its cultural and historical context, offering timeless truths.
Authors' Argument: A deep understanding of the cultural and historical context, including the meanings of words at the time, is essential. The authors suggest that much of what we understand as biblical truth is colored by later cultural and theological influences.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Mauro Biglino - MI-KA- EL: THE ARCHSTRATEGYST - 12-29-2021

For hundreds and thousands of years, people around the world have turned to the
Bible for information about God. Two scholars, Maro Bilino and Paul Wallace, argue
for a radically different interpretation.

Seeking out the root meanings of key words in these ancient texts, they find
another quite different story emerges, one with enormous implications for our
understanding of the human race and our place in the universe. For more than two
millennia, readers have interpreted the ancient texts of the Bible as stories of
God, a seamless narrative in which God creates the heavens and the earth, botanical
and animal life, and eventually the human race. However, a number of anomalies in
the texts, along with intriguing questions of translation, point to another
possibility. Paul Wallace is an internationally best selling author, researcher
and scholar of ancient mythologies. Over the last decade, Paul's work has probed
the world's mythologies and ancestral narratives for the insights they hold on our
origins as a species and our potential as human beings.

As a senior churchman, Paul served as a church doctor, a theological educator, and
an archdeacon in the Anglican Church in Australia. Paul's work in church ministry
has included training pastors in the interpretation of biblical texts. His work in
biblical translation and interpretation has revealed a forgotten layer of ancient
story with far reaching implications for our understanding of human origins and
our place in the cosmos.

Maro Bilino is an internationally best selling italian author, researcher and
highly regarded scholar of ancient Hebrew. For many years he worked for Rome's St.
Paul Press as a Bible translator, providing with great precision the literal
meaning of hebrew words for Vatican approved interlinear Bibles. It is an exacting
discipline. The scholar must be rigorous in avoiding any kind of interpretation of
the word and give only the literal, etymological meaning of each word.

Part Morrow's findings set him at ods with the conventional expectations of the
catholic world and propelled him onto the international stage, where his work has
opened up a world of cultural memory recorded in the Bible, yet hidden from the
public for centuries by mistaken translation and the dogmas of the church.
Together, morrow and Paul show that the root meanings of a series of keywords in
the Bible reveal an earlier layer of information very different to the story of God
associated with the Bible. Hidden plain sight in the pages of Genesis is an even
more ancient narrative, one which reframes the whole story of human beginnings.

The oldest word in the Bible, rendered as God, is the hebrew word Elohim. But is
that what the word means?

And what are the implications of the translation choices surrounding this
mysterious word?

Hello everyone. It makes me smile a little bit to see this Bible star that I
consulted to prepare this video. It is a real pleasure for me to be here with my
friend Paul Wallace to talk together about biblical topics. I will tell you about
a very simple concept, but very respectful of the way of reading the so called
sacred test. Then we will start from here with a series of short videos with the
aim of obtaining very simple indication for a respectful reading of the Bible, as
respectful as possible towards the ancient authors.

In this way we could do an autonomous reading and we could get an idea of what the
Bible probably tells us beyond what theology has told us. Instead.
At the beginning, of course, I would also like to give you some indications
relating to the absolute uncertainty that we have when we approach that text. I
mean the awareness of the fact that we know very little about that text. To
develop this topic, it is interesting to read some concepts expressed by Professor
Garbini, professor at the Sapienza University of Rome, professor of semitic
philology. Professor Garbini argues that Hebrew is a canonic dialect South
Phoenician. Actually, Hebrew is one of the many dialects within the canonic
languages.

We only know Hebrew as it was reconstructed at the end of the first millennium
after Christ, the so called Masoretic Hebrew. At that time, the important thing
was not to know the linguistic structure of those texts, but the theological
implications deriving from the various currents of Judaism.

This means that when we read the Bible, we do not read a text that followed grammar
rules, but we read a text that followed an ideological path, and grammatical rules
were not a problem for the authors.

This is important because over the centuries, many grammatical rules have been
developed, for example, those relating to the term elohim, which from plural
witches must absolutely become singular. The linguistic and grammatical rules have
therefore been elaborated after. So we know only one of interpretation of the
biblical text, that of the school of Tiberius, which produced Mesoretic Hebrew.

The hebrew language in the beginning was expressed through the consonants of the
phoenician language. Hebrew was written without vowels.

We will never know how the Bible was originally written.

The vowel sounds were introduced by the school of Tiberius between the 6th and 9th
centuries after Christmit. Professor Garbini says that when we speak of ancient
languages, even the agreement of all scholars on the meaning of a term is not a
guarantee of certainty. Based on this information, what we can honestly do is try
to do a literal reading of the Bible regarding the term Elohim. In the face of
all these uncertainties, I think the best thing to do is what I will tell you
shortly. Elohim is actually a term that you don't know how to translate.

For this reason, it is translated in many ways.

For example, it is translated with the term God. But the jewish exeget themselves
say that in the hebrew language there is no term that indicates God as we
understand it, as an omniscient, omnipotent, transcendent spiritual entity that is
to be worshipped. Elohim is also translated as judges, legislators, governors, the
bright ones from above, and so on. All these terms that are used actually
indicate the functions that this Elohim performed, but do not say who they really
were.

The Elohim were certainly judges, they were certainly legislators, they were
certainly governors. But who they really were and what the term loom really means,
we don't know.

This is the fundamental thing. Since we don't know, we must have the correctness
to say it.

Here in Genesis 2013, we see one of the examples relating to those uncertainties I
mentioned earlier that concerns the term Elohim and the verbs that are used.
This is the passage where Abraham tells his story and tells when the Elohim
brought me out of my father's house.

Then you see that here the verb is translated in the plural form. This is the
Bible translated for scholars who know the hebrew language. This is the guide of
the verbal forms present in the Old Testament. And also here it is said that the
verb it is in the plural form in the third person.

So it is certain that the verb connected to the term Elohim is plural. But in the
Bibles translated for families, the verb is theologically translated into the
singular because the term Elohim must indicate God, and so it must have the verb
in the singular, even if it is plural in Hebrew.

As you can see, the bibles translated for scholars respect the letter of the hebrew
text, while the bibles translated for families contain theological translations.
That is, they must convey an idea, a different concept from what is written in the
original Bible. Labia di rutero, la bibia de Jerusalem, labivia concordata, labia
de la garciona. All these Bibles are translated for the public, and therefore they
have the translation of verb in the singular form. Luther's Bible the Jerusalem
Bible the Bible of the German Bishops Conference, the King James Bible, the
septuaginta, that is, the Bible translated into Greek, the Bible published by the
House of the Geneva Bible.

All this derives from the fact that Elohim must be translated with the singular
term God.

The Bible of Jehovah's Witnesses translates the verb into the singular, but in
the note it says that in reality the verb is plural, plural.

Various commentators from different schools try to explain why this plural verb
must be translated into the singular. But each time they are explanations that
always have the purpose of affirming that Elohim refers to the one God.

I don't want to go into the merits of all the explanations that have been worked
out to try to prove that Eloim is singular.

To refute them. It is sufficient, for example, to take psalm 82, which clearly
speaks of an assembly of the eloim and follow what Professor Manuel Tov of the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem says.

He says that the various ways used by Hebrew to indicate the term we translate with
God actually refer to different people, and the terms are Elion and Yahweh.

El is probably one of the singular forms of the term elohim. The other form is
eloa.

In Aramaico, abiamo.

In Aramaic we have elaha.

In syriac language we have Allah.

In Arabic we have ilah. To then get to identify the unique God with Allah. The
Arabs say la ilaha ilalah wa muhammad rasoul allah. There is no God apart from
Allah, and Muhammad is his prophet.

We still remember that even the Jews tell us that we will never know how the Bible
was read because there were no vowels.

As you can understand all these terms, if they are considered without the vowels,
they are all very similar.

So we are faced with the same category of individuals. Also, from the point of
view of the meaning of nouns, from the point of view of the use of verbs, from
the point of view of uncertainties in the translations, we are faced with a
situation in which we don't know.

So in this situation of not knowing what, we can do a very simple thing to read
the Bible respectfully, I think it is right not to translate the term elohim, the
term l, the term eloah.

And when in the Bibles we have at home, we find the term God, we can replace it
with the term elohim, thus living the word used by the biblical authors.
So we will understand that without entering into useless discussions and with the
utmost respect for the biblical authors, if you read the Bible while keeping the
terms they use, we will realize that we are faced with a Bible different from the
one we are told, but a Bible much more fascinating, much more concrete, much
more understandable, but above all, much more logical than what we are told at
this point. I give you an appointment here in the videos with my friend Paul
Wallace to address other indications about the most respectful way to read the
Bible.

Ciao from Italy.

I'm very happy to be in conversation with Maro on these topics because my own
research journey in the Eden series have brought me to very similar conclusions.
And it was initially the issues around the word Elohim, the plural form of the word
elohim, that broke me out of my old world of narrow christian orthodoxy to a point
of view from which I can see that the Bible is not a book about God in the way I
thought it was, but it is actually representative of a kaleidoscope of entities
from the beginning of the hebrew canon to the very end. Now, the word elohim is the
Bible's oldest word that gets translated as God. But as Mauro has pointed out, it
is a masculine plural form that takes plural verb forms. And as I began drilling
down into those questions, I realized that the problems thrown up by the plurality
of that word are not just a grammatical glitch.

They represent an earlier form of the story in which Elohim was understood to
represent a diversity of beings. There is a body in the hebrew canon referred to as
the sky council, in which a number of elohim sit in council together. Now, in my
Eden books, escaping from Eden, the scars of Eden, and echoes of Eden, I argue that
the Elohim stories make better sense if we do just as Maro just said and read them
with the word Elohim still in place, or if we use a root meaning, the powerful
ones. When we read the stories that way, the stories change, but not in a random
way. They change in a way that resolves many of the moral questions we would have
over the Elohim stories, why such brutal and unconscionable things are done, how it
is that human beings get slaughtered in the conflict of the Elohim, something that
doesn't make sense if Elohim is translated in the singular as God.

But the other thing that is revealed is that the moment you reread the stories as
stories of the Elohim, the powerful ones, you quickly realize that you're reading
the summary form of the source narratives from out of ancient Mesopotamia, the
narratives from out of ancient Sumeria, Babylonia, Arcadia, and Assyria.

I sometimes get a knee jerk reaction from people of faith regarding what I argue for
in the translation of Elohim as the powerful ones. And the knee jerk reaction is
when people of faith say, ah, but wait a minute. We know that God is Father, son,
and Holy Spirit. So this is the christian theology of the Holy Trinity.

Surely that's why Elohim, the Bible's oldest word for God, is a plural. It must
represent the persons of the Holy Trinity well, there are many problems to that
reaction, and the first is that the Holy Trinity is a christian doctrine. It's
separated from the work and intent of the original authors by millennia. And the
theology of the most recent redactors of the hebrew canon was a monotheistic
theology. They did not believe in multiple gods.

And in fact, the insertion of the holy name Yahweh over earlier Elohim texts such
as we see in Genesis three or Genesis eleven, reveals that that later redactor is
turning the stories of the Elohim into a story of God. And it's those adjustments
that throw up many of the moral problems. Why would a holy God genocide people?
Why would a loving God bomb people back into a Preston age condition from having
previously been a technological civilization? This is what we read in Genesis
eleven.

So, no, it's not a representation of the Holy Trinity. And would it make any
sense for thousands of human beings to get killed in the crossfire between the
Elohim? Is that what happens when the Father, son, and Holy Spirit get into a spat?
Of course not. Now, the original stories are about something else, Elohim.
What I would argue are powerful ones. Now, some theologians argue that when the
word Elohim is understood as the powers or the powerful ones, that it doesn't
specify what kind of entities they are, that this word could refer to anything more
powerful and advanced than humanity. And so we shouldn't draw specific conclusions
from the word. T. T. Clark published a theology of the Old Testament which was modestly titled the Theology of the Old Testament. It's edited by S-D-S. Salmond, and in it they quote the theologian A. B. Davidson, and he writes, these words, in contrast to men, angels belong to the class of Elohim.

Now, I'll pause right there, because that's a reminder that the word Elohim gets
translated in various ways through the hebrew canon. In one place, it's God, and in
another place, it's chieftains or judges or landlords. In another place, it's
angels. How can this earliest word for God be so elastic? And why would the
ancients choose a word to denote the unique, transcendent God, but also denote
random other entities who they never define?

It's slightly ill fitting. So the quote goes on, it might be interesting to
contemplate the question of how the same name, Elohim, came to be applied to God
and this class of beings. Agreed? Good question. Then he goes on.

Perhaps we should be satisfied with the general explanation that the name meaning
powers is applied from the standpoint of men. To all that is above man, to the
region lying above him. That's an interesting phrase, isn't it? Though? The same
name is given I.

E. To angels and God. The two are never confounded in scripture. Well, that's a
rather disingenuous thing to say. The two are never confounded in scripture.
That's a nonexplanation of why the word can mean angels here, or false gods here,
or demons here, or judges here, or God over here. What's the truth of the word?
And that's why I argue for rereading the Elohim texts and leaving Elohim in the
text, so that the shape of the stories becomes that much clearer to the modern
reader. Another theologian who points to the word Elohim as representing a
kaleidoscope of powerful entities is Michael Heiser, and he rightly points out
that the word is far more elastic than we generally believe. But it's only a
halfway explanation as to why that is the earliest designation for God.

Why would God be categorized with arconic entities, other material beings? Why
would there be this competition among Yahweh and the other Elohim? And it's clear
in moments in the Bible, Yahweh classes himself as an Elohim. There's an occasion
when his king wants a prognosis on his health, and he sends for advice from the
Elohim of the people of Ekron. Yahweh gets furious and says, is there no ElohIM
here that he could consult, that he would run off and consult the Elohim of Ekron?
And it's a moment when you realize these Elohim are in competition with one another
for hegemony. Go to the ten CommanDments and you've got something similar, where
there's a great forgetting of the other Elohim being commanded. You're not to bow
down to them. You're not even to depict them. You serve only Yahweh.

And then Moses'successor, Joshua, says something very similar. Cut yourself off
from the Elohim the Egyptians serve, and the Elohim YOur ancestors served on the
other side of the river in Mesopotamia, and you should serve only Yahweh. So there
we have a world of many powerful entities, but you serve this one. And so the
Yahweh character is set among the many Elohim of the hebrew stories. You also have
stories about a sky council in which a number of elohims sit in council together,
presided over by the character Yahweh.

How can you have a council where a number of those entities are fictitious, but the
president of the council is real, and that's God. That's not quite coherent. We
have to realize there is an earlier form of the stories, prior to the 7th to 6th
century BCE edit, and the original form is a world in which there are many Elohim,
many powerful ones, all presiding over their own respective human colonies. Maoro
and I are not the first people to point out the moral problems thrown up by reading
the Elohim stories as God's stories. There were some really significant church
fathers at the beginning of Christianity who pointed this out very clearly and who
were wishing to nudge the church away from regarding the hebrew scriptures as
foundational for Christianity.

That decision had already been taken in acts 15 reading that book, and yet the
arguments had to be had all over again in the first 1234 centuries of Christianity.
An origin argued that if you read the Elohim stories as if they were God's stories
and took them at face value, then you would end up believing in a God of whom you
had to justify the most brutal actions. We would have to believe of God. He said,
quote such things as we would not believe of the most savage and unjust of men. So
he pointed out very clearly, there is a moral problem when you translate the Elohim
stories as God stories.

I completely agree with Maro that when the final redaction of the hebrew canon was
done in the 7th to 6th century BCE, the agenda driving that edit was an ideological
one, not a grammatical one. And that is why you can have texts where the
theological problem of too many gods has been cleaned up, but the grammar is a
mess. The fact that the earlier grammar of the Elohim stories survives in stories
where the name Yahweh has been pasted over the top is a clue that you're not
reading the original form, and a clue that the original form had more gods or
advanced beings in it than the current translation wants to give away. And the
shape of the hennetheistic world remains. The stories don't make sense until you
realize there are many powerful ones in the picture in competition with one
another.

When Abraham gives this explanation of why he moved from ur of the Chaldes, he
says, the powerful ones told me to move, and we have the Elohim, the plural form
noun, and then told me to wander is a plural form verb. Now, the plural form verb
is clear in the Hebrew, so that survived that 7th to 6th century BCE edit. But
what that information does not survive is the translation into English, because
you translate it into English and told me to is no different whether you've got a
single or a plural subject of that verb. And so the translation into English hides
the fact that Abraham is actually referencing many powerful entities. And this is
why it's important to go back to the Hebrew, to look at the translation of these
words.

This is the power of the work that Mauro has done, because as a translator of
interlinear Bibles, he had to give a very precise rendering of each word in the
hebrew text with no interpretation, no theological orthodoxization of the text.
Simply report what's in the text, and then you have the translations either side,
and you can see I've got a plural form verb in the Hebrew, and it's been changed
into a singular form word because the translators want this to be about God when
it clearly isn't. I argue in the Eden series that when in the text, the Elohim
say, let us make the humans to look like one of us, they really do mean that. Look
like is a very concrete term, and one of us is very clear. The plurality is
emphasized there.

If that word is translated as God, you've got a philosophical problem, and you've
got a grammatical problem. As soon as you translate Elohim as the powerful ones,
the problem resolves. Elsewhere in Genesis three, you have the Elohim arguing over
how intelligent the human beings should be, and one of them says, we don't want the
humans to be as intelligent as us. And once again, the conflict and the plurality
of the language throws up a problem that even a child can recognize in the telling
of the story from conventional family translations of the Bible. Those questions
resolve as soon as you realize that you are reading a story about multiple Elohim,
conflicting over how intelligent human beings should be.

Not a new story. It's actually a summary form of the conflict between Enlil and
Enki in the ancient mesopotamian stories. In my book escaping from Eden, I argue
for the root meaning of the word Elohim as being the powerful ones and suggest that
when we read the stories that way, they make sense and they line up with their
sources. There's a coherence to that picture which emerges. But if you don't want
to follow that logic, just keep the word Elohim in the Elohim texts and reread the
stories that way.

And that's quite sufficient for a different shape of the story to emerge, a story
that has something different to say about the world in which our ancestors lived,
that gives different information about our origins and our place in the cosmos.
The final edit of the Old Testament of the Bible, the hebrew canon, included the
layering of some beautiful and profound theology over the top of ancient texts.
Unfortunately, mistranslating traumatic ancestral memories as if they were
encounters with God is a choice with far reaching consequences. Belief in a
violent, xenophobic, hierarchical God has been used through the ages to justify
violent wars and all manner of abuses. However, the fidelity which the ancient
manuscripts have been curated in the hebrew canon by countless generations of
priests and scribes means that in our generation we can now return to these
fascinating artifacts of our prehistory and ask how differently they might be
translated.

To find out more about Paul Wallace and Maro Bilino, along with links to their
published works, follow the links in the video description.

View me!

Mauro Biglino – Cannibalismo Sacro 09-10-2023

Mauro Biglino - Cannibalismo Sacro 09-10-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The document discusses the historical and theological nuances of the mass, particularly focusing on the concept of transubstantiation and its interpretations. The term "mass" has its origins in the Latin language, with interpretations varying from it referring to those sent on a mission, to the host (the consecrated bread) being sent. The term "host" is highlighted to mean victim, implying the delivery of a victim during the mass. The document deeply engages with the theological debates around the substance of the host, detailing arguments on transubstantiation, transfinalization, and trans signification, among others.

The author, Mauro Biglino, then navigates through the historical and linguistic journey of the term "Moloch" or "Molech," traditionally associated with a deity to whom child sacrifices were made. However, the document elaborates on the interpretation that "Molech" might not refer to a deity but to a type of sacrifice, the "molek" or "holocaust" in Phoenician, meaning a complete burning of the victim. The Hebrew language and its verb forms are explored to understand the term "Molech" better, suggesting that it refers more to the act of sacrifice itself rather than a specific god.

The document critiques the parallel between ancient sacrificial practices and the Christian mass, positing that the idea of consuming the flesh of Christ during the Eucharist is a form of sacred cannibalism similar to ancient rites. It mentions the psychological and communal aspects of mass gatherings, suggesting that the mass might also serve to create a shared sensation among the participants, likening it to a form of theophagy or sacred cannibalism.

Throughout the document, there is an emphasis on the need to understand these religious practices within their historical and linguistic contexts, urging a re-evaluation of traditional interpretations and beliefs. The document concludes by questioning the spiritual representation of the mass in light of its historical and anthropological origins, hinting at a need for a broader understanding of sacred texts and rituals.

#MaurioBiglino #Mass #Transubstantiation #Moloch #Sacrifice #Theophagy #Cannibalism #Host #Victim #Eucharist #Christianity #Ritual #Holocaust #Phoenician #Liturgy #Biblical #Hebrew #Debate #Theology #Church #Doctrine #Luther #Calvin #Latin #Communion #Psychology #Anthropology #Spirituality #HistoricalContext #Linguistics #SacredTexts #Catholicism #AncientRites #BeliefSystems #CulturalCritique #ReligiousPractices

Key Takeaways:

The term "mass" and "host" have deep historical and linguistic roots, with implications for understanding Christian liturgy.
"Moloch" is traditionally associated with child sacrifice but may refer to the sacrificial act itself, not a deity.
Debates around the substance of the Eucharist (transubstantiation, transfinalization, etc.) reflect diverse theological interpretations.
Parallels are drawn between ancient sacrificial rites and Christian mass, suggesting a form of sacred cannibalism.
Understanding these religious practices requires a re-evaluation within their historical and linguistic contexts.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Mauro Biglino - Cannibalismo Sacro 09-10-2023

Good morning.
So, go, mass is over.
Ite missa est. Let's say that this statement is obviously one that we all know and which concludes the rite of the liturgy of human sacrifices.

Well, maybe things aren't like this, they wouldn't be like this.

of the mass in Latin, something that Benedict XVI, so to speak, more widely granted and this is added, within the same interpretation of the mass, the discussion relating to communion, that is, what happens to the host.

We know that we are talking about transubstantiation, that is, the Church says that the substance of the bread truly becomes the substance of flesh, that is, it truly becomes the flesh of Jesus Christ.

There are other theological interpretations which they have been discussing for years, for several years, even if this obviously takes place not for the benefit of the public but within, so to speak, the experts and we talk about transfinalization, that is, we say that in the moment to the human sacrifices already present in the Bible". The term mass which derives from Latin has had different interpretations, different interpretations, according to some it derives from missi which means those who were sent, it could indicate the fact that the catechumens who originally participated at that rite, when it was time for the sacrifice, they were sent away because they could not assist, or missi could have been those who were sent on a mission, let's say on an apostolic mission, or missa was the host, that is, the fact that the host, therefore the bread, the consecrated bread, had been sent, that is, it had been brought to be delivered to those who had not had the opportunity to participate in the common rite and therefore consumed the consecrated bread elsewhere.

However, I already remember an important fact because then we need it to understand afterwards that host means victim of therefore what is delivered is the victim.

Speaking of victim we all have in mind the term Molok which would indicate a divinity to whom, in a particular way, they were offered another provision of Benedict XVI annulled it by prohibiting the celebration in Biblical Hebrew. I will try to do it in the most concise way possible, so that it is clear why, I repeat, it is then functional to the next part which is the really interesting part. So now let's go and see. So now let's see how verbs are treated in Hebrew precisely to represent, And now we see how this mass, that is, the modern mass, is closely linked others speak of trans signification, that is, a change in meaning of what is then consumed by the faithful, still others say that trans finalization, trans signification are within trans substantiation. We know that Luther spoke of consubstantiation, Calvin still had a different vision so in reality, as I said before, the divisions
within the Church are really many also in relation to the interpretation of the culminating event, because the culminating event is the sacrifice of Jesus Christ who is renewed, shared with the faithful who then must also consume his flesh.

because in fact, as all the statistics now say, the Churches are emptying and if they are emptying it is not due to external attacks, that is, it is not the fault of those who, so to speak, criticize the Church from the outside. The Churches are emptying because the Roman Church is imploding due to problems within it and Francis' motu proprio, Traditionis Custodes, has effectively canceled Sunday, we know it means go because mass is over. It would also be easy to make a joke in the sense that I'm thinking of that Venetian parish in which the parish priest has posted a sign saying mass suspended due to lack of faithful.

Now we are going to read a very authoritative source. However, in order to fully understand the possible true meaning of Moloch which then refers us to the modern mass, it is necessary, I ask permission to do so, for me to give you two very brief indications on the way in which verbs are handled in the Hebrew language, in the way in which verbs indicating actions were constructed of the consecration actually changes the purpose of the host, it does not change the substance.

as I was saying, the intentionality of the action, the aspect of the action. verb that we are examining in relation to the mass, so that we do not forget, we are talking about Molok, even better in Phoenician Molk and in Hebrew now we find Molech and so here so, let's say, we close the circle. Semitic at the Sapienza University of Rome, has dedicated studies to this aspect and to this term and tells us a whole series of interesting things.

Now, obviously I will spare you all the philological analysis because it is really, in short, for super enthusiasts, but let's come to the conclusions which are the ones that interest us for the connection with the Mass. So, in the meantime he tells us that the Hebrew molech that we are now going to read, i.e. the Phoenician molech, was transposed by the Greeks, transliterated by the Greeks as molok and therefore became the divinity that we know.

But he says we can affirm that molek presents in Hebrew the Phoenician meaning of holocaust, that is, it does not indicate a divinity. qatal form is killing in its simplest aspect.but it indicates the sacrificial act, that sacrificial act which consisted in completely burning the victim to transform it into smoke which then went upwards and not for symbolic reasons, we have already seen it several times but because that smoke was particularly liked to the Elohim that, as written several times in chapter 28 of the book of numbers, that smoke calmed them, in particular it is Yahweh who says it, that is, the biblical Elohim. Professor Carbini cites in particular Jeremiah 32-35 and the second book of Ages.

Now let's go and see them so we can better understand his reasoning which leads us to have another meaning of Moloche and to link it to our current mass.

In Jeremiah 32-35 It is said that they built the Then there is the octal form, which is the passive of this, that is, he was killed. And then there is the last form, the seventh, which is it cattel, which is the form, let's say, intensive reflexive, he is killed with particular violence, therefore he committed suicide in a particularly gruesome way. Here, don't worry, it's not that you have to remember these things here, you'll see that now everything becomes clear, what interests us is this, that is, this shape here, the a stone falls on him, this stone hits a passerby and kills him, so here's the thing But things may not be that way.

Professor Garbini, professor of philology violence, killed vehemently, massacred, slaughtered. Then there is the Kuttal form, which is the passive of this, he was killed with, he was killed with vehemence. Then there is the Iktil form, which is said, is called the active causative form, that is, he caused to be killed, therefore causative. that is, he was killed. Then there is the third form, which is called Kittel, which is the intensive form and which here already represents intentionality. that is, killed with The first verbal form is called qatal and conventionally the paradigm is always rendered with the third person
singular of the perfect tense therefore it means killed, killed in the simple form i.e. without intentionality, therefore
a person is working in ancient Israel on the construction of his house, he is found on top, We sometimes use paraphrases etc., however in Hebrew there are changes in the roots.

So, to give an example, let's use the verb kill, it is also often used in grammars, among other things perhaps not by chance because killing is a particularly widespread verb in the Bible. let's not forget, however, that we are talking and we are clarifying, trying to clarify, the discussion relating to Moloch and therefore now we see these verbal forms.

As regards, I repeat as an example, let's choose the verb kill. Now let's see what a very authoritative source says about this. Molok is precisely the, as he is known, as the God to whom human sacrifices were offered, in particular children and therefore there was this God Molok.

Then there is the The second form in which it occurs is the Niktal, which is the passive of heights of Baal in the valley of Ben Inom, and this Baal was Baal Amon, to pass their sons and their daughters through the fire in honor of Moloch." active causative form. This means that Molech originally designated exclusively the Molch or rather the Phoenician Moloch and the passage of the name from a sacrificial term, that is from a term that simply indicated the sacrifice, the passage of the name from a sacrificial term to a divine name was made subsequently".

So in in reality here we are talking about sacrifices made to the various Baals, including obviously Yahweh who certainly did not do without them. and in another of his works Professor Garbini explains this correlation says, corresponds exactly to the Phoenician form Moloch which is the participle in the the Greeks did. the molk sacrifice of Phoenician origin. Here is where the term Moloch appears in the Bible, in the translated Bible and perhaps in the translated Bible, let's say with the conditioning of that transliteration which which we are talking about between Moloch and the Christian mass.

The conception of Christian sacrifice and especially its manifestation in the liturgy of the Catholic mass reveal profound and precise structural affinities with king where it is said that they made their sons and daughters pass ba esh lam molek, it is written and here the term molek appears, not the term molok which instead appears in translations and which appears in the
Greek Bible Phoenician molk, which is the passive participle, this form here of the verb ala' which means to send upwards,
to send, and obviously through the sacrifices they sent upwards this smoke which the Elohim really liked, which the divinities of I would say generally on planet Earth.

Let us first of all remember the sacrifice, that massacre that Noah commits when he returns to dry land and actually amasses dozens of animals taken from who knows where, look, certainly not from the ark, he burns them and therefore to create a large column of smoke, a molek, a sacrifice through which one sends one upward The same Latin term missa which, he says, refers to ostia and I remember that ostia in Latin means victim, is simply the simple translation of the word The same thing is said in the second book of kings, in chapter 23 in verse 10, where it is said that Josiah, the king of Judah, made Tophet, that is, that sacred place, which was in the valley of Ben-in-Nom, impure.

Made pure in the sense of his own, he also had it destroyed, so that no one would let their son or daughter pass through the fire in honor of Moloch". But what is actually written in the Hebrew Bible? Let's read directly , since the two passages are the same, we read only one, we read the one from the second book of made precisely from these passages that we have just read, tells us that the explicit mention of the deity Baal makes the interpretation of Molech as the name of the sacrifice, not the name of a deity, safe. And then he tells us yet another interesting thing which, in confirmation of this, we have precisely the testimony of the Greek version, that is, the one which reports Moloch instead and says that it corresponds exactly to the Phoenician form Moloch which is a participle in the passive causative form, which is why I have explained all these things, so in the causative form passive of that verb, so in reality it is not the name of a divinity but it is the participle, in this particular form, of a verb and therefore indicates the name of the sacrifice. which perhaps influenced the translations and contributed to creating this idea of the existence of this divinity called Molò when in reality the divinity for whom in this case they had their children burned, for whom they had their children burned was Baal Amon or, as Yahweh himself says in another passage of the Bible, it was Yahweh who burned them when, he himself says, and I gave them orders for which they could
not live when I forced them to pass their firstborn through the fire.

Professor Garbini, in his examination the victim. Let us think of the same Sumero-Akkadian Noah who does the same thing and who, the Sumero-Akkadian texts tell us, once this hecatomb is burning the and so on. I talked about it in the books where I made parallels between the Bible and the Greek texts, it is talked about in the texts of the Far East, Strabo talks about it with regards to the Celts, the stories relating to the Central and South American civilizations talk about it, so in reality this was very widespread but the interesting thing is We must understand, we must honestly accept and admit that it is exactly the same thing, it is sacred cannibalism and there is something that is sent.

Now, many interpretations are possible regarding this something that is sent, I said before which ones related to those who were sent sent out at the moment in which the sacrifice was celebrated etc. however, you know, it is also said that when there is an assembly of many people it creates something that is sent and this is one of the interpretations that is added to the others .

I represent it to you as it is described but I am also sure that many of you have tried it, so much so that, for example, it is said that one thing is... let's leave religion for a moment... watching a sporting event or I don't know, listen to a singer on television. Another thing, from the point of view of perhaps all these assemblies within which these rites were celebrated also served and can also serve to create something else that is sent and that is used and it is not a question of magic, it is a question of something what Professor Garbini does, this direct relationship this is the mass, that is, the sending of the host, therefore it is clear that if this host, this victim, as the Church says through the doctrine of transubstantiation, is truly the flesh of God , here we are talking, without any shadow of a doubt, about theophagy, that is, about believers who eat their God or, if you prefer, about sacred cannibalism". sensations, emotions, what you feel, but what you feel almost on a physical level, it means actively participating, that is, being present in that rite, be it a sporting rite or a singing rite, because something is created there , that is, you experience different sensations. of physique.

I myself experienced it in the ten years of conferences when I always traveled alone and often drove for many hours, for example when I gave conferences in central Italy, Umbria rather than Marche, and therefore perhaps I drove alone for 6-7 hours, 8 hours and I arrived an hour or two before the conference, I often arrived even a little tired let's say, but as soon as I started meeting people, especially when I entered the room and gave the conference there was something not magical, but a something that almost physically charged me, so much so that I was able to go on talking for hours and hours and hours". Well, perhaps this is the meaning of the assemblies that are created and that were created for these rites, they also had precisely this aspect.

And perhaps this is also the aspect that has been lost, the reason why people no longer, in quotes, feel the Mass, because perhaps these sensations are no longer created. And this is perhaps also the reason why the traditionalists would still like the Latin Mass, the one that I said at the beginning the Pontiff prohibited, because in the Latin Mass they perhaps seemed to sense something that in the Mass celebrated, in the language understandable to all, perhaps is not created more.

Now, anthropologists describe to us these forms of rite, theophagy or sacred cannibalism among different populations, let's say so-called primitive, located in various parts of planet Earth and when we read about these stories Well, I can't tell you exactly whether things are really like this but the suggestion is very strong. the fact remains, the fact remains that, if what the Church says is true, here we are faced with exactly as in ancient civilizations, exactly as in the stories of populations scattered across various parts of the earth, we are faced with a rite in which the faithful physically eat the flesh of their God. Anunna or Anunnaki come attracted by the smoke as flies are attracted by the flesh we tend to look with a bit of disdain and instead we tend to represent in a spiritual way, in a higher way, what happens within the liturgy of the Mass.

Bye, thanks, see you next time.

View me!

The Hypothalamus: The Real Eye of Horus? 🔍: BLIND HORUS EYE – 10-15-2023

The Hypothalamus: The Real Eye of Horus? 🔍: BLIND HORUS EYE - 10-15-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The document discusses the concept of the "Eye of Horus" and its significance in ancient cultures. It delves into the idea that Horus and other deities from various pantheons were space aliens. The symbol of Horus's eye is related to health, healing, and regeneration. The document also touches upon the connection between the Eye of Horus and the human brain, particularly the hypothalamus. The hypothalamus is vital as it controls hormones and other essential functions. The text further explores the idea of consciousness and its continuous recreation at a rate of 22 trillion times per second. This pulsing is believed to be the source of all energy in the universe. The document also mentions ancient symbols related to the mind-to-machine interface and suggests that these symbols were used to enhance the human brain's capabilities.

#ClifHigh #EyeOfHorus #AncientSymbols #SpaceAliens #Deities #Hypothalamus #HumanBrain #Consciousness #Energy #Universe #Recreation #MindToMachine #AncientCultures #Health #Healing #Regeneration #Hormones #Pulsing #AncientScripts #Mesoamerica #MiddleEast #Gold #Aliens #Symbols #Pantheons #Egyptian #Greek #Hindu #Babylonian #Talmud #Duration #Time #Matter #Space #Linguistics #Technology

Key Takeaways:

The "Eye of Horus" is a significant ancient symbol.
Deities like Horus might have been perceived as space aliens.
The Eye of Horus is connected to the human brain, especially the hypothalamus.
Consciousness is continuously recreated at a rate of 22 trillion times per second.
This pulsing is the source of all energy in the universe.
Ancient symbols might have been used to enhance the human brain's capabilities.
There's a historical connection between Mesoamerica and the Middle East.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

The Hypothalamus: The Real Eye of Horus? 🔍: BLIND HORUS EYE - 10-15-2023

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. It's the day of the solar eclipse, the 14th October.

We're going to talk about Horus's eye here, right? Horus is an Egyptian god. Horus is a space alien like all the other pantheon of and you know, any of these other fuckers you care to name, wotan or Arjuna or any of the guys in the Hindu pantheon or Greek or whatever, right? They're all space aliens. It all resolves down to space aliens, actually a small amount.

If we go through and look, there's a couple of listings in some of the ancillary books of the Babylonian Talmud that say that the divine council that Elion ran, in which Yahweh was like a colonel, okay? He wasn't even a general. But Elion or Adonai ran this divine council, and it was supposed to have numbered several hundreds. Okay? And if we look in the Hindu pantheon and look at all the minor gods and that kind of thing, there's quite a few you get out there.

Right. Anyway, though, Horus was this Egyptian god, and this is his symbol that's come down to us. I've drawn it very badly here deliberately, okay. You'll sort of recognize it. It's the eye of Horus symbol, and it's about health and healing and recovery, but also regeneration.

Okay? And that's a little bit of a key to what we're going to go into here. Now, Horus's eye comes to us from about the second century into the last descending Kali Yuga, so 2000, so about 22,000 some odd years back. Right. And the timing is not that isn't particularly important.

What is important is that if you take that symbol and you adjust it for size and transpose it over a sliced section of a human brain, that is, if you there's a left and a right one of these, okay, so there's the left eye of Horus and then there's the right eye of Horus. And they have some very subtle differences. And that's key. Also, if you go back to the originals, you can't really depend on a lot of the images you're going to find online. You got to go all the way back to where you can see this thing painted onto or part of a mosaic or put into a mosaic of tile.

Something that was actually within the Egyptian construction. That they did it okay because they did it to a level of precision and nuance that is lost when you take digital images of it. Anyway, this is the left eye of Horus, okay? And if you take the human brain and you slice it in half the little tiny part that connects it at the bottom because it's basically two large chambers that are sort of fused. So it's like two large chambers of the brain here that are sort of fused together, but they're not really they separate very easily and then they're joined at the bottom by this very complex structure.

That complex structure, when it's cleaved in half is represented by this image, okay? The left and the right. So if you were to cleave this in half and take the left half of the brain and impose this image over the bottom part that connects it, you'll find that there is a remarkable, unmistakable match and analog in each of these elements to the brain itself. Right. It can't be denied that this image is representing the human brain, a very specific section of it and the very specific section of it, the eyeball part, is represented the hypothalamus.

Okay. The hypothalamus is extremely important to us because it is at the core of this joint. It's a little tiny gland that controls all your hormones, controls your snout. Without it, you can't smell. If you do something stupid like abuse certain kinds of drugs, you can eliminate your ability to smell forever because it damages the hypothalamus.

We cannot supplement the hypothalamus that we know of. There's, like, I can think right offhand of three, but I could probably research it. Maybe there's 30 or maybe there's 50. But within traditional Chinese medicine and ayurvedic medicine, there's three that I know of three substances that nourish the hypothalamus. One is chaga tea.

I don't think it's as powerful in that function as Shizandra, which I'm drinking now. Chaga tea and shizondra are both and the other one are both or. All of them are adaptogens. Okay? We take them because they aid us in adapting to stress.

The reason that they aid us in adapting to stress is because they affect the health and well being of the hypothalamus, which controls your hormones. Duh. It's a big well duh moment, right. Cortisol and all of that kind of shit is controlled by the little eye in the eye of Horus, symbol the hypothalamus. So if you want to be nice and mellow and that kind of stuff, you have adaptogens every damn day, maybe several times a day, given these days, right.

Everybody trying to get you all whipped up and stuff, raise your stress hormones all the hell and gone and get you to choose a side and go commit to go kill somebody, right?

Doesn't matter much who. It's the killing and getting whipped it up part that they need. Okay? So what we're going to do is have a, I'm hoping, reasonably brief discussion here that comes back to the hypothalamus and Horus's eye, which dates way back there. Now, I'm uncertain of the date.

The date is an important aspect of this. It allows us to place certain things relative to certain other things and get a more structured view of what actually happened in the far past relative to linguistics and stuff, right. Which AIDS us in building up a cohesive view from which we can make decisions in a better way than we could without that view. All right? So a lot of this is coming from something that looks like the eye of Horus, and that's this symbol here for which we have no name.

It's a linguistic symbol, but we don't have a phenome for it. We don't know how it was pronounced or what it represented in the way of a word. There is a word for this, but I'm not going to go into it in Egyptian or in my personal view, much more pertinent Aramaic and other languages relative to this symbol. Anyway, but we don't know what this one was called, okay?

This one was discovered by one of our old Fart team, and we've all looked at his analysis and how he comes by it, and we all agree that he's really probably quite fucking correct on this, okay?

Anyway, okay, so even within the Babylonian Talmud, you can come to this idea that consciousness, or if you want, in the Talmud, they call it God, okay? And you're supposed to have a personality attached to it. You're supposed to be afraid of it and all of that. But they're talking about God in the sense of the universal creator, not Yahweh or Elion, okay? Although they took Elion as being a local God because the fucker had technology and he was so powerful.

Anyway, even in the Talmud, you come to the idea of God shoving aside some space in Him in order to create the universe. And we see a similar analog in Shinto, which is entirely actually based on that understanding that consciousness separated in order that matter and all of us might appear. And they have really good descriptions about the separation and how all that occurred, right? But we also find this concept in Buddhism. We don't find it in the Abrahamic religions, except in, as I say, through the Talmud, there's this allusion to it, that God created space for the universe within itself, okay?

So if we take that as a general understanding and just use the word consciousness here, then this is sort of a drawing of that separation of consciousness and everything that's not in that cube. That image of a cube is greater consciousness, and everything that's within the cube and the cube itself forms universe, okay, where matter exists, as I call it, the materium, because there's aspects of the universe that are not material, and they are important, okay? Now, my understanding of how this all happens is that greater consciousness flashes us all into creation 22 trillion times a second. So it's a continuous creation thing, and it flashes us into creation and creates duration by creating all of us with this pulse of energy that goes through the universe in note, takes no time for it to recreate universe at all, okay? And it does this 22 trillion times a second, 22 trillion instances, actually more than that, 22 trillion instances per second, recreates us.

This allows for motion and impulse and energy within our universe and all different kinds of things, including as we're going to get into the formation of energy within the universe. Now, this also turns out to be important in the grand scheme of things and how we operate down here within the belly of universe, of the material. All right. So when it flashes, okay, so it isolate consciousness, isolates us with a thicker layer of itself, from itself, so to speak, right? So consciousness made room for space by decreasing its own density, in a sense, okay?

And this is just I'm applying words that relate to the material, that don't relate to consciousness, but we're using those as an analogies, all right, as an analog. And so it creates a barrier here for all of universe out of thicker, denser layers of real, actual consciousness, the greater consciousness on the outside. That's hyperspace, okay? It's not a cube shape, probably. It's infinite.

We'll never find the edge of it, okay? You can't find the edge of it by taking your corporeal body in in any kind of a device, shooting yourself towards anything you presume to be its edge. You'll never impact the edge that way.

This is why Einstein and all these people think that space time is curved, okay? And they say space time. I say space, okay? And matter that is created by were einstein and all of his ilk were misinformed about the relationship of time to matter and space. And space only exists as a function of matter and vice versa, okay?

Matter cannot exist without space for it, and space requires matter in order that it might exist as well. But both of these are created by time. Duration is what we feel within the actual material universe that we're here. We feel a lagging wave of the 22 trillion times a second recreation of our bodies, our thoughts, every damn thing. We feel that lagging wave as duration, and we put the label on it of time.

The same energy that pulses through and creates universe is, in fact, time with a giant T, okay? There are no timelines. There's no branching universe, timeline, shit that you might get from Quantum or Einsteinian stuff. It does not and cannot work that way energetically. When we go through this 22 trillion times a second recreation, we get a recreation in a very specific order of the energies that we're able to perceive here.

Now, bear in mind a couple of things in between. Each one of these 22 trillion pulses is a void, okay? But that void has no duration. It has no space. It's just looking right into, so to speak, looking into the greater consciousness.

So it's flashing through the greater consciousness 22 trillion times a second to create us and everything we see in the dust and the dirt and all of this crap, right, and all that grit when it does that flashing, it sort of jumps the void. But the void exists. We know the void exists. We can prove it. I can go into some of the cool stuff you can do with the void later but right at the moment, what we want to concentrate on is that recreation.

It's that recreation pulse that creates impulse in our universe. And there's no other form of energy in our universe. If you'll examine it, there's no steady state energy at all. It's all pulsing. Anything that's steady state is inanimate, okay?

It has no action. It has no dynamism at all. Even life is pulsing. Your blood pulses, et cetera, et cetera, right? Your thoughts are on a cycle.

All of this shit comes from the pulse. When universe recreates us, what happens is that all of us little consciousness get recreated 22 trillion times a second. But we get recreated, if you will. There's no duration involved because it's so fast. We get recreated ever so slightly ahead of all of the other denser stuff, okay?

Because our consciousness is not material, and it resnaps into focus, so to speak, 22 trillion times a second. And it does so just nano, nanomillisecond ahead of the next thing, which is the ether that surrounds us all that we can think of as everything inside the box, in the box itself, right? The inner lining of the box, not the hyperspace, but the inner lining of the box. Then the next thing that. And that also instantly creates the magnetic field, which gloms all the matter back together, okay, within our consciousness and our perception.

So the matter snaps back in. That's important. This snapping, this boom recreation 22 trillion times a second creates the impulse that forms all the energy in our universe from suns, electricity, every fucking thing also forms psychic energy. And psychic energy comes in third, okay? And psychic energy exists at a level that we have yet to create a device other than our own brains to apprehend, to appreciate, to be able to view.

We don't have a screen. You can hold up and look and see psychic energy. Nothing like that exists. All of our screens and stuff are down here in the electromagnetic spectrum, and they're too dense to be able to perceive that level of the psychic field. There are ways we can get at that, but we don't have them yet.

Okay? Next in is light, and that's below the psychic field. We know that this is the way this is because you can actually do psychic experiments that will alter the trajectory of light.

Then, of course, then we get the electromagnetic spectrum, and that goes all the way down to and includes gravity, which is another form of ancillary magnetism. There's basically two forms of magnetism. One is a primary, and one is a so, one is agglutorating, and one blows us apart. Within that 22,000,000,000,000th of a second recreation of all of every damn thing, okay? So all of this here in this structure and the hyperspace structure is important.

We need to do some discussions about hyperspace as technology, how to interact with other beings. There not necessarily blowing your mind with psychedelics I've got some thoughts on that. But right now we want to talk about Horace's eye as a function of space alien technology. Okay? So my old Fart group, these old bastards that are just dinking around looking at stuff, one of them found this symbol.

And I won't go into where geographically or from what language, okay? At the moment it's his to deal with and so on. He doesn't mind if I discuss it because he's much more involved with some other stuff. But this particular symbol I was taken because of how it resembled this. Then we start investigating this symbol relative to the other symbols within the document upon which it is found.

And we find that a lot of those symbols seemingly are related to the mind to machine interface stuff that I've discovered through Patanjali's Yoga also went into Chinese literature and we see it's in the Torah, all of these different kinds of references to putting humans to work driving these machinery that we don't have anymore. Right? And so the mind to machine interface stuff I ran into also included this section about in this old form of Sanskrit. I'm using AI to get at it. It's a royal pain in the ass in so many ways you wouldn't believe to deal with the current AI in dealing with all of this stuff because it always continuously wants to reinforce the religious narrative, right?

And I want to examine this with that narrative stripped away to see what is actually being discussed. And so if you do that to this symbol, you find out some very interesting things that this Eye of Horus relates to the brain, it relates to the human brain being used with these mind machine interfaces. And this particular symbol here that has been found by my colleague in this little group in this ancient script based encoding. We don't know if we're talking language, if it's just signage or whatever. This and a number of other symbols appear to be related to giving humans gold, which is how we found this symbol in order that this part of the brain might be more active relative to the mind machine interface and thus do more work for the aliens.

Okay? And so within the structure of our looking for things we came across relative to the mind to machine stuff, we came across this symbol in a number of different forms, including a form that you find in Mesoamerica. Okay? So whoever was doing this, there was cross cultural contact between mesoamerica and the Middle East up through into Iran during the time that this symbol was being put on walls and shit. We think I do anyway, that this symbol here, I mean, you can see how there's various different glands within the brain that are represented by this.

The structure of the brain here, how this ties into this particular part of the brain there. The Eye of Horus is actually the hypothalamus. We see this thing here connected to symbols that sort of refer to the middle part of this, right? And so it's not quite the eye of Auris, but that's what I thought I was seeing initially when it was presented in this document. And I had this guy say, I told him, scroll back.

What was that we were looking at? Then he explained, well, this was like one of 13 or 14 out of this long scroll thing, symbols that there was no phonemes for within this particular translation of this particular language. And they thought it might have been punctuation. They weren't sure what the fuck it was. But if you took all of these things together and put them together, you had a structure that was very much like what we see in the lid of Polanc, where you see the meso American guy in the headdress that's apparently lying on his back driving some kind of a vehicle that looks like it's being powered by rockets.

These symbols in that document had that same impression. And so we started looking in some of these kind of things. What we found along the way, though, was and the whole point of all of this and I've got to get back to work here is that there's a connection between hyper novelty that's upcoming and our hypothalamus, okay? It is feasible to think that the hypothalamus, the little tiny, tiny, tiny juncture of the two halves of the brain, forms an internal gateway, this kind of thing, to psychic ability to being able to pick up the psychic field itself. If you look at the hypothalamus from if you were to look at this symbol here in three dimensions, you might see it as something like this with both halves of it, like, how am I going to do that?

Okay, so we'll do it like this, with that being the hypothalamus, so that when it's sliced in half, it looks like this, right?

And these would be down the other glands, and then this area back here would be coming back towards us. I don't know if I made that in any way clearer, but in a three dimensional structure, this is a very complex antenna, okay? Antennae, actually, because there's two single channel or two multichannel yaggies that are formed by that that are joined by the hypothalamus itself. I'm of the opinion it's like an antennae for the psychic field. And the literature that we've got suggest that the hints within this old shit that we're interpreting and sure, we're undoubtedly going to misinterpret it in our favor, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, but seems to suggest that the hypothalamus is the point of control for our mind machine kind of stuff, okay?

So that as a physical reality, that's where the control mechanism is focusing. But you don't I won't go into how it works. But anyway okay, so in our space alien technology discussion stuff here, there are a couple of guys in our old Fart group that are of the opinion and I can't prove them wrong.

They're of the opinion that as we rise up higher in aspect to Galactic Center, that the energies that are going to be coming through and dealing with us. And also those energies that have already been coming through and dealing with us. The two episodes. Two waves of strange energies from space, which are now going to be followed by pretty much continuous rising of energy from space as we get further and further into the Bronze Age. They're of the opinion that these energies are basically being picked up by the Hypothalamus, okay?

Which that's going to make it the point of the hyper novelty. That's where it'll be experienced. Okay, here is the point of what I wanted to say. Get your adaptogens into you now because here's what's going to happen potentially, all right? So we have descriptions in all kinds of literature, all the fucking gone about humans in the ancient past, and we're talking back into the other previous Bronze Age, the descending Bronze Age and the other Silver Age and the Golden Age.

And you look at all this literature and you got blue skinned humans and humans can fly and all this kind of shit, right? All right, that may have been absolutely possible. And we can't rule out any of this kind of stuff because we've never lived through a time where we've had exposure to those energies. But the point of the discussion today is that if I'm correct and we're going to start hitting the period of what, what I called hyper novelty, and we actually hit it early in 2024 as a result of alignments. I can tell this like astronomical alignment, right?

What planets would be blocking us, which ones would not, et cetera, relative to rising up and getting more energy out of Galactic Center. That's going to start in early 2024. But I think by April 3, all of the people that are already pretty much aware of themselves and monitoring themselves, taking care of their health, drinking their adaptogens and that kind of stuff. So by April 3, you guys may be noticing the hypernobility. I think by the twelveTH of June, middle of June, the hypernobity should be, if not perceived, at least felt by the the larger mass of the normies.

Okay? So they may feel it even if they're not aware of feeling it much more than it's hard to describe, right? But they might feel some effects of it and just not really be so self aware that they're really concerned about those effects. They may or may not take advantage of them and so on. But I think that those effects are going to hit us in the Hypothalamus and it's going to really boost our psychic stuff.

Now, there are some side effects to this though, because the Hypothalamus controls all your hormones. It is also the center of the brain for perception of smell and it's a routing system for pain. There's going to be some ancillary side effects here, right? You might be able to smell an Opossum farting 500ft away. Wouldn't necessarily be very good, right?

In fact, it may really get to a point of brain confusion as we go through and start trying to adapt to what we're feeling in hypernobality. But there's a lot of reasons to suspect that it will be palpable to our bodies to some degree. And that's why I'm saying, basically, get your adaptogens in you and get used to managing your stress. Especially with the Kazarian mafia trying to get everybody to kill everybody else's AI babies.

Anyway, so that's the point of this.

Okay? So we haven't reached the level of release language that my forecast had suggested we would. We've still got maybe two thirds left getting there. They're doing everything they can to gen up the release attention language, get us into that freak out mode. I think there's two larger events coming and some smaller ones on the other side of that.

So it looks like we're going to skate this weekend and not get one this weekend, one of these larger events. But of course they can pop out of the blue, they'll just happen, right? It'll just happen, even though the Kazarian mafia is orchestrating it and directing it and so on. So the next really good possibility for it is at the end of this month going into November, and then further on about mid November or something for the second one. Their planned episodes, as near as I can tell.

Within the descriptions in the data. The third one of these things is not going to go well for the people that are going to create it or involved in it or whatever. So we'll see how that goes. Anyway, it was just really interesting about finding these symbols within the discussion of humans and gold and all of that kind of stuff in these ancient languages and humans being put to work mining for gold. So just as it's really interesting, the space aliens, by the way, the Anunnaki, the Elohim, all those fuckers, all of the Devas, all of the pantheon of Greek and Roman gods, all of these guys ate gold and they ate in a particular way, in a particular form.

And they did it for the Neotropic effect, right? For, I guess, longevity in their species, but also it lit them up, lit up their brain. They had a particular form that they came up with, this fourth form. Three forms were for them, one was for humans. The fourth form was given to the human pilots and it apparently lit up our brains as well.

But you burnt out really quick piloting these craft. So it was sort of like a cool job, but don't worry about retirement. Anyway, so what we're doing, what the old farts are doing, basically, we're trying to deal ourselves in, okay, and figure shit out ahead of it all happening. And so part of our goals in going through all these languages and crap is to look for things like the word l in the Bible. The word l in the Bible does not mean God.

It's not a Hebrew word. There's a lot of non Hebrew words in the Hebrew Bible. That's the way it is in all of these religious texts. There are non native words within those texts. And what we're trying to do is the old farts here, we're trying to find all of the non human words and put them together and see basically what fucking language the space aliens spoke back in the old times, because we know that the word rauch used in Yiddish and Hebrew and stuff is German meaning fire, right?

And it was the rauch of Elohim that they called the Holy Spirit. And it's like, no, that means the rocket ships that the Elohim used, as opposed to the little floaty vehicles, which are further described by another word. And we see that these words are cross language. And so what we're trying to do is basically develop some understanding of the communication that the space aliens use themselves, which is interesting on its own. But anyway, I got to get moving here.

So my advice is to connect with adaptogen that does you good and keeps you nice and calm, because we may be getting into periods of non human induced energetic stressors hitting your body and striking you in areas where all of a sudden, maybe so I don't know what will happen. I don't know how it will actually manifest. I've looked at some literature. There's some discussions about all of this. US old farts are kicking around some ideas.

But it might be that the first thing you notice is an extremely heightened sense of smell. Okay? It might be that you notice that one day you wake up and you go to the diner to get coffee the way you usually do. You're an old fart, and you start hearing the waitress's thoughts in your own head. It's like, whoa, that kind of shit, right?

So it might be telepathy. There's a lot in the ancient literature that would suggest that that is or was available in the past. We know it would have to go through the hypothalamus. It would deal with this antenna structure within the brain. So it may be that that might be part of hyper novelty emerging.

We have no way of knowing because we haven't gone through it.

I won't go there anyway, okay? So take your adaptogens and take care, guys. And remember, my god can kick your god's fat ass. And if he can't, I'll go get another god. There's a shitload of those fuckers out there.

So take care, all right? Tough times.

View me!

Heart Beat of Time – 08-16-2023

Heart Beat of Time - 08-16-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The text discusses the novelty theory and the work of Russian scientist Kozyrev, who focused on the nature of time. After spending ten years in a Siberian gulag, he developed experiments in the 60s that led to the observation that time exhibits aspects of pressure. This pressure builds up to a threshold before manifesting a result, a pattern that repeats in various aspects of reality, such as the stock market, heartbeat, and chemical reactions. The text emphasizes that this understanding of time's pressure-like behavior can be applied to various fields, including linguistics, and is a fundamental aspect of our reality.

The text explores the concept of building tension and release in various contexts, including chemical reactions, language, human interactions, and societal dynamics. It emphasizes how this pattern can be observed in individual behaviors, such as a fight between two people, or on a larger scale, like potential civil unrest. The author also connects this idea to novelty theory and the Yuga cycles, suggesting that humanity is entering a new age where increased energy from the Galactic Center will lead to an "up-leveling" of human consciousness and technology. The text concludes with a hopeful outlook on humanity's potential growth and evolution.

The text discusses the transition from the Kali Yuga (Iron Age) to the Bronze Age, emphasizing an up-leveling of complexity and novelty production. It contrasts the simplicity of life 500 years ago with today's interconnected world and predicts another significant uptick in complexity. The author explains the Yuga cycles, including the transition periods, and asserts that humanity is 25 years into a 75-year transition to the Bronze Age. The text also criticizes the Khazarian Mafia for attempting to suppress this advancement and predicts a short-lived hyperinflation period. The author concludes that the transition to a new age is inevitable.

The text explores the shift from building tension language to release language, reflecting a change in societal dynamics. It discusses the increasing complexity and novelty in various aspects of life, such as parts shortages and the potential for on-demand production through 3D printing. The author emphasizes the transition into a new era marked by decentralized and diversified solutions, predicting that this trend will continue for the next 2100 years. The text concludes with the idea that the universe rewards novelty creation, and individuals can benefit from understanding and adapting to these changes.

#3Dprinting #adaptation #advancement #BronzeAge #causality #change #chemistry #complexity #decentralization #experiments #heartbeat #hyperinflation #inflation #innovation #KaliYuga #KhazarianMafia #Kozyrev #language #linguistics #manifestation #novelty #noveltytheory #pressure #reality #release #science #SiberianGulag #technology #tension #threshold #time #transition #YugaCycles

Heart Beat of Time - 08-16-2023

All right, one more time. Hello, guys. Hello, humans. Hello, humans. It's almost nine Wednesday morning.

Heading inland to do some shopping and chores, chopping and anyway, wanted to talk about the idea of the the novelty theory. But even more than that, aspects of the novelty theory that may actually exist, okay, they may be able to be projected as a result of Cozy Rev's work on time in the 60s. So Kozi Rev was a Russian scientist. Quite brilliant. Ended up pissing off the fishildom and being sent to a gulag for counter revolutionary thinking and no good in the old Soviet days.

But in any event, so they let him out of the gulag ten years early, after he'd only been there for ten years and for ten years. So that isolated him from physics, from everything. He had no equipment or any of this in the gulag. He was digging coal in Siberia. In any event, though, during that period of time, he did a lot of thinking, and he came up with a whole bunch of experiments, which they performed single lane road here and a pilot car.

They performed these experiments through the 60s, okay? So without going into all of the different experiments and the nature of what they were attempting to get at and so on, there was a common observation that came through all of these experiments that were involved with time, okay? So cozy. Rev was experimenting with time. He wanted to find out stuff about time, and he did a good job.

There was a lot of thought that went into it over the ten years that he was in the gulag and didn't have equipment and couldn't do anything, and he was digging coal.

Actually, I think he was also cutting wood. They was out on a wood harvesting thing in Siberia. He was in a Siberian gulag. In any event, though, so he comes up with all these experiments that go to the nature of time, and without going into those, there was a common observation that occurred in all of the experiments. It showed up in all of them relative to time, regardless of what aspect of time was being investigated.

And here's the gist of it, okay? They had an observation that Kozarev could say, when things are involved with time, there will be this effect. And this effect is hard for me to describe, but it's very easy for me to illustrate with a quick graphic, because with a graphic, you would easily draw this particular shape, and everybody would say, oh, yeah, I get that, I grasp that. But here's the idea.

It's an aspect of pressure, okay? So time exhibits aspects that are apparent pressure. And so it's very much in terms of how it manifests, it's very much like a pressure cooker where you put your rice or your millet or something in the little pressure cooker. And you put your water in there and you put the top on and the little weight, and then you put it in heat. Put it on some heat, and you wait for the pressure to build up.

Okay. And when the pressure builds up, you know it because the little weight is overcome by the pressure. It rises up and steam comes out and there's that hissy noise, the noise or however the hell the machine makes it anyway. And so that takes some duration in order for that to occur. And so you put it on there and at some point after it has heated up and so on, there will be pressure building up from the evaporation of the water, from the heat that can't escape and so the pressure keeps going.

Time itself seems to function in this same manner in that there is a pressure threshold before there is manifestation of result from causality. So this where it gets really tricky in talking about all this. You got to be really precise but you have to define the terms so that everybody understands. So if you're in a meeting about this shit, you know that everybody is talking about these terms in exactly the same way, right?

And this setup, this observation that Cozy Riv made continues to exhibit no matter how he approached demonstrating causality and result as demonstrable manifestations of time, he would always get this building threshold being crossed and then the event and in the process of that event manifesting, the metrics involved would drop slightly. So if you were plotting it, you would have a line that would rise at some steep angle upward. It would reach a particular peak. And then as we see in things like stock market charts or even blood pressure or heartbeat even it's all there. It's everywhere.

The same dynamic repeats everywhere in reality, in all aspects of reality. Chemistry in your heartbeat. Like I say, pumping blood, thinking everything is driven by time. And it all repeats this same pattern, which is this rise up to a threshold, the crest of the threshold. A slight drop as the event is manifest into reality.

As the result of the causality occurs, there will be always a diminuation of the energies involved at some level as the manifestation takes place. And there's reasons to we can go into to explain this, as to why this happens, why this occurs, why this is a necessary component of time. But at the moment we're not going to go into that. We're not going to deal with that. But we are living through or in.

Okay? So we live in a time based reality. This time based reality puts this particular observable flow dynamic on everything from chemical reactions, biochemical reactions, growth, how we would talk about kids having growth spurts, how they'd seemingly grow and then sort of sort of stop growing for a while, right? It's not a continuous process. So there are no continuous processes within our reality.

Everything works on this pulse because time provides this pulse which creates impulse, which creates waves, which creates all forms of energy within our manifesting reality right within the material.

So we can plot that same kind of like rise up, slight drop down and then a little bit of a flat plateau and then another rise up just like on your blood pressure. Just like if you look at the little graphs on your blood pressure as they're taking your blood pressure and it, you know, does that, what do they call it? Sinusoidal rhythm, right? And that is part of the manifestation that we get out of time on all things. So it is not a surprise that, for instance, my work with linguistics would discover that we had, quote, pressure coming through on language that would exhibit exactly the same kind of graphic dynamic as does time, as does the heartbeat, as does the pulsing of the sun.

All of these things now in our manifesting reality, where most of us don't care about, to a great degree about the millisecond by millisecond aspects of causality and we only deal in the world of results. This is a key function for us, right, because we can say that, oh, well, we'll get a result at this point when this particular energy has crested this level of threshold and we may not be able to predict it. Some things we can predict. So you can predict that kind of thing in, say, a chemical reaction. If you knew that you had so many moles of this chemical and so many moles of that chemical and you were mixing them together and you're going to get a chemical reaction, you can say that.

Well, based on the molecular density of this particular element within the chemical reaction, we will get our manifestation, our result, our completion of the blending, the compounding of these chemicals at this point because we can anticipate the time involved because it's all of the known quantities. And we've got that formula for how fast certain chemical reactions occur pretty well. Delineated all right. And so what I was trying to do in a sense that wasn't my goal, but one of the things that my work aimed into was being able to do a prediction on manifestation of causality relative to language. And so in the process, in the early days of doing the work, I discovered that, well, jeez, there's various different kinds of pressure here linguistically, but they all seem to behave in either a building tension fashion or a release tension fashion.

And the language was subtly different and the emotional elements was different in each. And so I could start determining, oh, this word being used in this way with these adjectives is a manifestation of building tension, right? Or I could say that, oh, look, that same word now has these adjectives and is showing up in this level of density and we're about to get a release episode around it because we're getting release adjectives building up.

It was fairly reliable that way. Okay, hang on, just get a shut down here. So we could do that, we could anticipate release occurrences off of building tension. At some point, maybe it was 2002, I started figuring that out. And then by 2003, I was able to make better and better projections relative to timing for the manifestation of something that was within the building language.

So you would see this in humans in a gross situation where you got two guys, they're at a restaurant, for whatever reason, their moods are compatible with each other, with the intent of contention, okay? So they may not be pissed going in, but whatever, they're all set. They get in, their circumstances develop. And then you have contention between these two guys. Before there's actually any physical interaction, there will be a rising amount of tension.

They'll be building tension, language. And you've heard it before, how they talk to each other before the fight, so on and so on, right? Not necessarily swearing at each other, but building up to the point where one of them will cross a threshold. They will have had their emotional building tension up to a certain point and then they will have a release episode within their mind and they'll start swinging. And that's the reaction, that's the dynamic, they've crossed that threshold and the fight is on.

So we see these kinds of activities all throughout our reality, this building tension peak, little tiny bit of a drop and then a plateau as the manifestation occurs. Now we're living in that at this point as we get further into the manifestation, the emergence of this next level of novelty theory relative to humans. So here's where it gets quite a bit tricky, okay? That same level of building tension dynamic with its peak and then a slight drop and then a plateau, that applies to grouping tensions as well. So that design pattern manifests in groups of humans at all different levels.

And as you can see, for instance, we have potential contention and potential civil war here in the United States with some of these assholes shooting at each other and that kind of thing, but mainly not because we haven't crossed that level of tension in the release language, right? And so everybody knows the tension is building. You got a lot of people saying, hey, we're headed towards civil war, but we don't actually have it. Yada, yada, yada, right, we haven't crossed that threshold. When we do, then there's a dynamic, then things happen, then there is the actual conflict.

And there are a lot of people that know these kind of things and they're attempting to manage this and diffuse it so that we don't get into a shooting war here, that we don't get into a civil war.

So anyway, so as I say, it applies to large scale human activity as well as individual heartbeats and that kind of thing. And you can make predictions around this now, relative to novelty theory, here's what is happening.

The shift, for instance, in an individual. So you got an individual, you got a human that's got some problems with their heart, for instance, okay? And so they go into AFib occasionally, as they go into AFib fibrillation, as they go into this erratic heartbeat, they cross that threshold. There's the building tension. And then when it drops down into when it peaks and then drops into the plateau area, it goes into another form of action.

And you get the AFib. It doesn't go back to a regular beat. It gets irregular for whatever reason involved, doesn't matter. It happens at that point. And then you're into AFib, which has a slightly different heartbeat action.

But the whole of the AFib episode can be thought of as one of these building tensions into release tension, because if you're aware of the AFib, then it becomes a real problem on your mind. And then at some point, you need it to stop. And so then you get into release, and then you have a release within yourself that way. Okay? So in other words, going from a regular heartbeat into AFib can be considered to be crossing a chaotic threshold, but is also an elevation of the function of the heart relative to the amount of electricity going into it that causes the beats as it is.

And so, for whatever reason, at that point, you're getting more electricity into the heart and it's becoming irregular in its beating operation, may go faster. I don't think that they have AFib that goes slower as a rule. But in any event, though, so this is a pattern. And we are living through one of those patterns now where our social order is going through a regular heartbeat and it's about to get more energy. We're about to up level the amount of energy going into we finally get to go here.

We've been waiting on the pilot car. So we're finally getting into that point where we're able to or there will be this manifestation as we get into the next up leveling of the Algo, basically from universe that controls novelty, et cetera, right? We're at a situation where now everything contributes to novelty within universe. So the Yuga system is set up by universe to provide us a non static base that we can potentially create novelty from. So as the Yugas change, we get more and more energy from Galactic Center and we become better humans, so to speak, right?

We become more involved humans, more aware humans, et cetera, because there's more of these Galactic Center emanations. This is after we get out of the Kali Yuga, as we have 325 years now. And we're into the Dwapara Yuga, the Bronze Age, and it is short jeez. Anyway. And so we're now getting into these new ages where we're getting more energy from Galactic Center and humanity is going to up level.

All right? As a result of more of these energies. We're not as dense as we were. We're not as mentally dense as we were in the Kali Yuga. And you can plot our technology blooming and all these advancements and everything against these Yuga cycles and see that this is fairly factual, easily plotted.

And so we know that Universe is providing these things in order that there might be up leveling of complexity and up leveling of complexity towards the idea of creating novelty. And that's the whole goal, right, is more novelty, better novelty, et cetera. And we're right there now that we're taking this, we are in the process of reaching that peak, and then we're going to drop down into a new drop slightly, but then we'll come into a new level here of novelty production. And that level of novelty production is going to be literally a whole order of magnitude over the novelty production that we have been used to. So just as though you can see that in the middle of the Kali Yuga, back about 500 Ad or so, 500 current era, back about that far, people were riding on donkeys.

You didn't talk to but maybe 30 people in your whole life. If you lived in a village, you could live and die in a village. Your lifespan was relatively short, maybe 30 or 40 years, and you could live your whole life and not see more than 30 or 40 people. And so the amount of stimulation, the amount of variance, the amount of complexity was relatively little. Now we're getting into the point where every time you turn around, some shit's happening.

You've got Internet connecting you to everybody so that there's just so much coming in, there's so much more information that we were in a giant up leveling of information and complexity over what had occurred when people were riding around on donkeys and pulling loads of goods up and down the Nile with horses and ropes, right? That kind of thing. So we've had this big uptick on that level. Now we're about to take another one of those. Okay, so here's the way these things are thought to work out.

The Kali Yuga is split into two. Like all the Yugas are split into two. So you have a descending. So going away from the emanations of Galactic Center and an ascending of all of the ages of the Kali Yuga, the Bronze Age, the Silver Age, and the Kali means Iron. It's the Iron Age.

So the Iron Age, the Bronze Age, the Silver Age and the Gold Age. And you have an ascending and a descending on each of these. Now, as you go from one age to another, there is a one quarter of the time involved algorithm or design pattern, okay? So Universe would have the Kaliyuga be one quarter in length of the Golden Age. And when the Kaliyuga converts over to the Bronze Age, as we are in now, you go through a period of time where you're like losing the hangover of the Iron Age, where your people are becoming more and more intelligent.

They're being more intelligent as more emanations come in from Galactic center. And thus the whole population is being elevated mentally by these emanations as you go forward. And so the Kali Yuga halves, each half of it, the descending half and the ascending half, are each 1200 years old or 1200 years long. Within that, there's a one quarter of the distance thing, just like with radiations out in space. So one quarter of the distance away from the microwave, you've lost the square of the power.

So the power level drops down massively with distance. We have that within time. We find that this same pattern repeats in aspects of time, that is to say, duration aspects of time. So the Kaliyuga, each half of which is 1200 years. So in that 2400 years, we get this thing where as we are into the Ascending One now, and as we're leaving the Ascending One, one quarter of the time involved in each half in the Ascending One will be used to shed the hangover, so to speak, of that age.

So you have 1200 years of the ascending Kali Yuga, which we popped out of in 1698, and then we're going to have another 300 years, which was one quarter of that 1200 years in which we will transition from the mindset, the density of the Iron Age into the slightly more mentally sparkly Bronze Age, right? And so we do that for 300 years, and then we have a quarter of that distance, which would be 75 years, one quarter of the 300. And that 75 years is the period of time in which we set the themes for the developing New Age. So we're 25 years into that 75 year period. I know it's complicated, guys.

Basically what it's all saying is that there's a transition period, and we only have 50 years left of this transition period before we're, like, rock solid into the Bronze Age. But within this transition period, if you look around, you can see the themes, the driving mental focus that will be dominating this particular age. And so we know we're coming into an age of science, technology, et cetera, et cetera. And actually that's why we're having these big battles over all the non science nut jobs, the Khazarian Mafia trying to hold us back into the Kaliyuga. And so this is really all part of the novelty thing.

Okay? So the Khazarian Mafia gained power through the Yuga because of the density of humans and because of their particular predatory approach to dealing with things and their clanish behavior, right? Okay, so the Khazarian Mafia here has been trying to suppress the advance of humanity into the Bronze Age because they lose power when we think, right? When we're thinking we're not going to fall for their horseshit. When you're really thinking, you say, no, a central bank.

That's slavery. You're enslaving me to a hidden inflation that you're going to say is 2%, but it'll never be that. It'll be eight and ten and 12%, and you'll be hiding it the whole time and lying to me the whole time. The whole point of the Central Bank is to lie and thief and enslave me. And I can see this, so I don't want to have anything to do with it.

And so, consequently, in the Bronze Age, if everybody thinks that way, then we won't involve ourselves with their fiat currency and we'll do something else. And the Khazarian mafia will greatly lose power, as they are doing now. So we're seeing the collapse of the Soros empire. We're seeing the collapse of all of these skim empires where they make money because they control the money supply, and they rake off and they rob through currency exchange trades, all of this different kind of stuff. It's another layer of hidden enslavement by taxation on the money.

And so now we're at this point where we're reaching a peak, and we can all see that. We can see that inflation is reaching a peak to the point where we're going to kick over into hyperinflation. That will not last long, okay? That will probably last less than four months, maybe five, because we're a large country. There's very few countries like ours that have gone through hyperinflationary periods.

So when the Soviet Union collapsed, they did not go hyperinflationary. The devaluation of the currency from the outside was used to destroy the Soviet system by Reagan's people, but they did not enter into a hyperinflation. There were a few bits and pieces of it in few areas in the Soviet Union, but in general, the currency collapsed and it seriously collapsed. And everybody's reaction was to go to outside currencies. So they just basically abandoned their own internal ruble, the Soviet ruble, and they used it as markers, but they were using outside currencies as a basis for supporting any supposed purchasing value within that within that currency.

Okay. All right. I know getting really long and far afield here, but basically what's happening is we're crossing this threshold just as the Soviets did when there is an external pressure trying as the Kazarian Mafia has been doing for the last 300 plus years has been trying to retain their power which was entirely derived from their position within the Kaliyuga. And it's going to fail anyway because the Kaliyuga is no longer in effect, and none of us will be able to ever alter this at all. The only thing they think they've been able to do is to slow it down a little bit.

Right? So anyway, all that's going on, and this is the point at which our complexity becomes cominoric and we enter into this next level of novelty. So as much as you think there's new shit going on now, if you're into science, there's new stuff happening on science every day. If you're into sports, there's new stuff happening there every day. Medicine, health, anything, money.

There's just so much new stuff happening, it's difficult to keep up with it. And you find yourself not really even able to branch out to some other area of interest because there's so much new stuff in your primary area. And so no matter where we go, we're going to get this new stuff, novelty thing at a huge level. Now that we've reached this next level. And it's manifesting now.

Lots of people had predicted this to occur on 2012. Maybe that was the start of it, maybe that was the peak at a particular level of emotional threshold. And now we're into the new pattern that will be developing the next level up. This is very much like gaming where you go through a software game and you've done everything in a particular level. You get the final magic tomato or whatever the fuck it is, and you're promoted, so to speak, into the next level of complexity.

And everything gets a lot harder. So the challenges become harder. That's where we're at now. The challenges are going to become harder and we're going to have to decide how we're going to deal with it on an individual and collective basis. The collective basis is going to be just a bitch to work out because everybody's going to be so fractured and pulled away by all of this stuff.

So you'll see a lot of people that just don't pay any attention to politics or don't pay any attention to science or nowadays everybody's pretty much paying attention to medicine because we all got fucked up by the Pandemic, right? But even the Pandemic, they planned that. They wanted to kill all these people. This whole genocide thing was part of the Khazarian mafia trying to retain control. Universe won't have it, it won't allow it.

There were people that they killed. Obviously, as shit happens like this, these elements, so to speak, the Kazarian mafia attempting to do the Pandemic, the failure of the fiat currency, the mother Weffers trying to their next scam, which is the climate thing, right? Everybody needs to lock down because there's going to be wind today or something, right? Anyway, all of that shit, as well as the land grab in Maui, all of these things are all part of this point of developing pressure. These are all weights on the pressure cooker of that particular level of interest.

So we know that there's a desire for the mother Weffers to own all this property in Hawaii. We know that Obama wants to expand his Hawaii base. And so they direct the Dew weapons. They have the Chinese map, all of Hawaii with their lasers last year, and then this year they have the Dew weapons come on down and surgically remove those areas that they don't want people in, that they want to buy up. And then now, within just days, we've got a book out about it.

And within a couple of days, the government's now announcing that you can't sell the land. We're going to take it through eminent domain, so nobody can sell their land to anybody. Now, of course, the eminent domain means that they're just going to keep it and have a sweetheart deal for the insiders, right? And so that's the whole process. And the insurance companies are saying, we're not paying, and all of this kind of stuff.

So all this is all the building tension in that particular area. And this is the way it is with everything now. So we've passed out of the 25th year, okay? So within the 75 years in which we set our memes, our themes for the particular new age, that part of the transition. That part is also divided up into quarters.

And by the way, four is the number of time. And I can get into that at some other talk about what cozy rev discovered relative to time and digits, so to speak. But anyway, so that one quarter of that 75 years, slightly less than 20 years, and we're out of that. And in that period of time, we set the primary revision means, so to speak, right? So those things we're going to be undoing and redoing.

So we could go through now if we were smart enough and we had a big supercomputer and we could just look at all this language and stuff and say, okay, these are the areas that over the next 2400 years, humanity is going to be exploring. We know some of these things and it's really curious the way that it's coming out. If you'd done this exercise 200 years ago, you would say in 1894, when Yuktasvar analyzed what was going on, he was a Hindu scientist and mystic, and he analyzed what was going on and said, the themes for this particular Yuga will be ElectriCities and small particles. And indeed it is, but the small particles is crapping out. Okay, that's a stupid bad idea from the Kazarians that they put vast quantities of money into.

With all these atom smashers, the Large Hadron Collider and all of that kind of stuff, and that's reached its peak and it's about to collapse. It's going to be shown to be an absolute failure. Total waste of money, doesn't give them what they want. And their whole concept was bogus from the beginning because they were basically listening to Einstein and he didn't have a fucking clue. But as part of this is we are going to go into ElectriCities and energies and stuff, and we have investigated the small particles, but because it happened within the 300 years, it was one of the transition things that will be dropped.

So we know that we won't be dealing with quantum physics or particle physics at that level going forward. That in fact, it'll be the other it'll be the ElectriCities and the energy and. So on, which puts us back into the ether kind of an approach on things. So these things can be sussed out based on the algorithms that we can see relative to the yugas, relative to how time works and its functioning within humanity, how it manifests as a dynamic change within humanity. And as I wanted to say, we are there now for the novelty, not we're smart.

Okay? So we are not going to expect politics to calm down once Trump is back in as president, okay? In fact, getting there is going to be a huge issue because we're going to have to cross one of those major peaks, one of those major thresholds in order to get that to occur. So there'll be all kinds of chaos leading up to that and then it'll just put us on a higher level of plateau from which we build the next level of peak. And that's the pattern that we're in now.

So we can expect that in fact the, as Trump becomes president again, that in fact we should have at that point a major escalation in dynamic activity within internal US. Politics because we will be dropping into this next level. So when we peak and we come down slightly from that peak and we hit that plateau, that next plateau relative to politics at that point will be the base for the building for the next 2100 years. And so we'll be building from this point on upward. So we're not going to be like going back.

Right?

It's a difficult concept to get across. I find it easier to sketch it out because you can draw these lines and it just sort of shows things in a nice orderly fashion that is more congenial to our minds, may not be more accurate. Right. Very difficult to quantify things like time in a graphic drawing. In any event though, our escalation, our step up, our next level up in complexity here relative because of the novelty theory, algo taking us up a notch should be quite spectacular.

But in the main, I bet you most people don't even recognize it because we've got so much other stuff going on that everybody's just going to be like too involved in the day to day part of all of it to be able to think about it in the larger context.

Wow, we were there a long time anyway. So it's interesting that we're at this point now, I've been doing work with time and language for long enough that I've been able to see our building and release language manifest and since like maybe 2008, but certainly by 2010 there was a domination of building tension. Language that had not existed in the, had not existed in the early 2000s. It sort of started creeping in in the early 2000s where building language would always dominate. You'd have more of that than you have release language.

Now the reverse of that is happening. We're getting more and more release language as people shed the tensions and the emotions right away that are being shoved into them by this step up in our novelty algorithm. And so at the moment I suspect we're going to or for this period of time, I suspect we're going to be going into release language dominant for maybe decades. I just don't know. Going to be hard to say.

They should even out at some point. That's my expectation in any event. But that point might literally be hundreds of years away for all I know. In any event, though, over these next years, you can guide your actions by presuming that whatever you're seeing in the area that interests you is going to become ever so much more complicated and convoluted and complex in any and all facets of it. So you could just sort of anticipate that, right?

So you can anticipate that, oh, there's going to be parts shortages on everything pretty much perpetually from now on for a number of different reasons and we can get into those at some point. And so you can also anticipate that there's going to be different solutions to this. There's going to be more complex solutions. So you may find that we get people that set up shops and they do production on demand of particular parts. So you're working on a car, you find a plastic part that's broken or rubber or whatever.

And so you take the plastic part and you go into one of these little shops because you can't find that part because maybe the companies that used to make it doesn't even exist anymore. But you go in with that part to the shop, they put it into a 3D scanner, they scan it, get all the metrics, maybe have to glue it back together, do a little bit of fiddling to make it fit. Maybe they've got software that does that, who knows? And then they sit there and they print that part for you. Maybe that's going to be our solution to the part issue is that we'll set up little stores everywhere that will produce parts on demand.

And then maybe they can do this for metal parts, but they have to send it to the information to a foundry and then the part gets mailed back to you. That kind of a thing, right? And so we won't be in a position so we're basically transiting from a position of auto parts stores where they would stash existing parts that pre made and so on. Maybe that's going to slowly die off as we have to morph into this other approach here. So I've run into that with people I do business with where guy's got a tree business and he's got a lift truck, one of those trucks that you sit in a little bucket and it lifts you up on this arm way to the top of the tree.

So you can trim the tree or cut it down in chunks or whatever, right? And perfectly functioning business and everything. And then some parts crap out on his lift truck and lo and behold, nobody's manufacturing those anymore. And so he's out of business until he can figure a solution, which basically is another lift truck which he had not anticipated buying because when you buy a piece of gear for your job like that, you just sort of automatically think that you'll be able to get parts and keep it in good repair. And in this case that didn't happen, right?

Could not happen. Well, now we're back to that point where it's probably going to be this kind of a way for all different kinds of stuff, which is not necessarily a good thing if you're used to the old situation. But at least it is our approach, and it's going to be ever so much more complex and ever so much more novel than had existed. So it's an upgrade in novelty for us to split out to decentralized and so on and diversified part production for our machinery. And from there maybe we're going to have individualized factories that start up, that kind of thing.

No one knows exactly how this thing is going to mature and develop as we go forward, but we know that we're in that point of manifesting change where change is written with a giant big sea and it's going to be dominating our lives. Well, it'll dominate the rest of my life, but probably that dominate the lives of everybody that is able to listen to this because it'll be continuing like this for 2100 years as we are in the Bronze Age.

So anyway, that's where we're at. I'm almost at my first stop. Sorry about that. This one ran a little bit long. At least it gave us the opportunity to get into some of this stuff here.

But the takeaway on this is that there is this repeating pattern that shows up in every fucking thing involving any kind of activity, life or dynamic action in our material. And this operating principle has this threshold thing that reaches a peak and then it drops slightly and then you're into a plateau from which the next level builds up. And we're able to see this pattern in all forms of activity so you can predict that it will occur. Everything from heartbeats to whether or not there's going to be a fight breakout in that bar or restaurant, right? And by anticipating these things you can hopefully guide yourself a little bit better through some of this shit we're all going to be going through in this transition as we manifest our new reality here.

And that's basically what we're doing. We're all little elements in universe's novelty game, right? And so it's up to us to do our best to aid universe in creating novelty and in so doing universe will reward us. There's algorithms in this game that say if you're a good novelty creator, we'll give you lots of money. And we see that this happens all the time.

We see these effects where artists and creative people get lots of money for being creative people. And it's sort of a quid pro quo. They may not understand it. They may just be going with it. They like singing and everybody else likes their singing, that sort of thing.

But, um, it's basically this algorithm from Universe, and you can take advantage of it. Okay, guys, I got a lot of stuff here, and apparently I'm going to be held up on the way back too. So anyway, that's a discussion of novelty theory and talk to you later.

Bye.

Insidious Meme

Mauro Biglino - MI-KA- EL: THE ARCHSTRATEGYST - 12-29-2021

Related posts:

Mauro Biglino - Cannibalismo Sacro 09-10-2023

Related posts: