The TRUE story of Nikola Tesla - by Lt Col Thomas Bearden - 1990's

Well, my name is Tom Bearden. I'm a retired lieutenant colonel presently also rather suddenly retired from aerospace. With the aerospace step down widespread throughout the country, I've been doing research for many years into several areas. One on some of the work of Nikola Tesla. One on the area of trying to produce both a theory and some practical results for overunity electrical machines.

Small amount of work in antigravity and then some medical applications, primarily in a new kind of electromagnetics. I once said Tesla was a dichotomy. Certainly Tesla had certain idiosyncrasies which have been played up. Usually any creative genius does if you accept those and don't dwell on those. Tesla was a magnificent genius, in my opinion.

I think he was so far ahead of his time and what he could do and what he understood not necessarily in the language and the phraseology we use today, but in his own language and his own phraseology. I think he was well ahead of the times, 100 years ahead of his times. And maybe in this conversation we'll even go into that. If Nikola Tesla is what you said he is why is he so relatively unknown to the general public through a whole series of events? Tesla, in his life story, admitted one time he had been a gambler and then he quit because he was compulsive gambler.

The last great gamble that Tesla took, he lost. And that, of course, was his great installation on Long Island Wardencliffe. He had, at that time put everything he had into, you might say, one kettle. It was funded by Morgan. There was some struggle between Morgan and another financier who were in a great struggle with each other.

It affected the stock market. It created inflation and everything. Plus, Tesla had done a very strange thing as a gambler. He knew that Morgan would never give him his $150,000 that he needed to do the installation that he really wanted to do, which was going to cost more than that by some amount. So he had designed a smaller installation of two transmitters.

When he briefed Morgan and he briefed him only on the communications aspect of it, tesla had foreseen, as many people had at that time but he had clearly foreseen the broadcast industry sending pictures and sound and music and so forth and information through the air. So Morgan financed the $150,000 based on communications. Only Morgan knew of Marconi's work and some others who were racing to try to be the first wireless, as they called it in those days. Morgan was he didn't care about all the finesse and so forth. He was strictly a financier.

He was strictly interested in making money. And he knew this new area was going to go and going to make money, a lot of money for whoever got there first. And in his opinion, tesla had the best chance to get there first. So that's why he backed Tesla. Tesla, however, was even more interested in doing a worldwide energy system to provide energy that would be very cheap for everybody in the world, anywhere on the Earth.

And so the actual installation that he started building was this giant installation, so well known to the Tesla fans and people who read of Tesla and the struggle between Morgan and his counterpart. His counterpart almost bought Morgan's Railroad Company right out from under him. He bought, in fact, control of the voting shares of the preferred stock, but not of the common stock. And Morgan issued orders from Europe to buy all the stock that could be bought at any cost in one day. The stock made astronomical jumps.

The whole stock market went crazy. We don't have anything like that in our time. Inflation became suddenly rampant. Parts and electrical things went up three times, for example, and suddenly everybody furnishing parts. There was a panic because of the money shortage and everything, and the stock we would today call it a crash in other stocks.

So what happened is they began demanding all their money up front to the very beginning. Are you saying that Tesla was forgotten after Wardencliffe? That it was Wardencliffe that ruined his reputation? Well, it was a combination of events. There were many people who resented Tesla, particularly among the academic community.

Number one, they didn't understand at all how he worked. He didn't have the academic credentials, what they regarded the high academic credentials they had. He, of course, had academic credentials. He certainly had been very vocal. That the common electromagnetic theory, which he usually referred to as the Hertz theory and the Hertz waves, since know, proved the Maxwell predicted wave, tesla was adamant that there were no transverse Maxwell Hertz waves in the ether and that he, Tesla, was not using that kind of theory at all.

That theory was very limited and did not apply to what he was doing. In other words, what he was saying to the entire scientific mind of the day was that what you're doing, gentlemen, is erroneous, not only that I'm proving you're an error, but because he had become a household word, when you do, you become a single name Tesla, not Nikola Tesla, you see. And because of this kind of effect, he had become essentially the great wizard. He had given us the AC power system and everything. And there was a great deal of resentment for what they regarded as an upstart inventor who was, in fact essentially saying, I'm going to usurp your science.

They would interpret it that way. Not all people were detractors, but many were. He also was not a great theoretician. He didn't fill up books with great theories and full of mathematics, and so he just didn't practice the game as it was being practiced. He was ostracized, I think, primarily because of his difference and because of his radical statements and because of his pronouncements of great systems, they didn't have the foggiest notion of what he was talking about.

He had one other unfortunate incident which today we would laugh at, but was very serious at the time. I think it was 19 one. I'd have to check my records. He picked up radio signals from space. We know today, of course, that planets, radiate, RF noise and so forth, but when he announced this, it just caused a sensation and all the scientists said immediately, what a kook, what an idiot.

So an unfortunate reaction occurred in the scientific community that he had to be an utter kook because everybody knew that there were no signals from space and that was an unfortunate timing and contributed to his demise. Nicolettesl also had an ego very big, and there's some argument for the fact that his ego or his vision of self may have undone him as well. Could you address that? Yes, that's quite true. He was arrogant.

He knew in his mind what he had done and what he could do. He had done the experiments, for example, in his few months at Colorado Springs, which proved that he was on the right path. And he was hastening back to New York to get the funding from Morgan and set up his warden, Cliff, and get on with doing the wireless, but also the other energy at the same time. He was going to do it all in one stroke. And when this panic came along and supplies went up and finally he made the final fatal mistake.

He briefed Morgan in desperation. That what he was really about, because he thought Morgan would appreciate that he simply did not understand. A financier who's not interested in all of that. But what is it going to do to make me money? There's nothing wrong with that.

I'm just saying that's the way Morgan approached it at that point, morgan also knew that Marconi was closing in on it and very close to transmitting wireless across the ocean, the Atlantic. So Morgan knew at that point briefed on what yet had to be done and how much money Tesla needed and all that. He knew the game was lost from a communication viewpoint that Marconi was going to be first. So at that point, Morgan in his own mind wrote it off as a bad investment going sour. And one thing he did not do was throw good money after bad.

A perfectly sound business decision today, we would say. So he simply wrote the project off. Tesla could never understand for some months thereafter what had happened, why he couldn't get the extra money. People began to quit work because he couldn't pay them. The suppliers wouldn't send him his supplies because he couldn't pay them upfront.

And the whole thing began to sort of grind to a halt. He did get the installation in operation, but he never succeeded at what he was doing, and by that time, Morgan was never going to finance him again. A combination of events then occurred within a few years of that to where suddenly things began to shift. The jealousy of the scientific community began to suggest that he was, after all, just a kook. Everybody knew that thing on Warden Cliff was foolish, and so he became almost a non person in the space of a very few years.

An older man living in a hotel room, feeding the pigeons with all his idiosyncrasies. He really did have idiosyncrasies. He had a morbid fear of germs. He would use something like 17 white napkins for a meal that he would have and meticulously lay one aside. Once he made the first wipe with it to wipe his hands or whatever, he had a lot of idiosyncrasies.

And of course, his autocratic pronouncements, as you say. His ego also was there. He also had quite an ego. And so people just shuttled him aside and said, well, he's at best an egomaniac who's mistaken, and at worst, he's just a lunatic. When they simply wrote out of the books what he had done, I focused in on the electromagnetics, because early on in my work, I also became disenchanted with the present electromagnetics model.

To understand Tesla, you must take seriously, I think, his suggestion that the present electromagnetics model is seriously flawed. Nobody wants to take that seriously. Most of the people who approach Tesla use the conventional electromagnetics, and when they cannot explain what he was talking about, they say, therefore, the man was a kook. Now, suppose for a moment that he really was correct. Suppose there is something wrong with the classical electromagnetics.

Of course you can use the classical model to do the things we do, but it means there are many other things that can be done that we cannot do, because we have excluded that part from our model and from our teaching and from our knowledge and from our instruments. Let's pursue that a moment. The original electromagnetics written by Maxwell himself was written in an algebra called quaternions.

What we mean here is a higher topology algebra in which you can do things in this kind of expression of electromagnetics that you can't do in vectors or tensors. Now, the real theory that Maxwell had, depending on who counts the equations and what they count, is something like 20 equations and 20 unknowns to give some numbers to it. When Heavyside got through, translating it into a much simpler algebra called vectors, which he helped create, and he wrote all the modern equations that are used as Maxwell's equations, not Maxwell himself. None of those ever appeared in anything by James Clerk. Maxwell, when Heavyside modified it to a much easier algebra called vector analysis, which he helped complete the algebra itself.

It consisted of some two equations or so with an extra equation thrown in, depending on the way you want to count that again, certainly if you want to count the full thing, four equations so you can see a remarkable reduction in the amount of variations of things you could do. And that's what I mean when I say we previously had an electromagnetics that permitted lots of functioning that is no longer permitted by the kind of electromagnetics we're all taught to apply and use today. It's a subset of what can be done. A scientist by the name Barrett, a very brilliant scientist, has done a very good analysis when Hertz announced his discovery of the maximum waves. It's in there if you read it.

But actually, Tesla went to Hertz to convince him of the error of his waves and showed him experiments and everything else to prove that the wave that was actually in the ether was not a transverse string wave, but in fact was what today we would call an longitudinal sound wave, a wave of refaction and compression. He did do that and was not able to convince Hertz. But Hertz was very disheartened by all this evidence that Tesla had given him, but never revealed what the evidence was. Let's look now and see if there's any room for what Tesla was saying. And I want to tell you a story of the greatest joke on all of science in all of history, because you'll never understand Tesla till you know this joke.

When they were trying to write the wave equation for the plucked string wave, of course they were studying plucked stringed instruments. You have a taut string suspended between two points on the body of an instrument and they simply plucked the string various ways and watched the waves. They then wrote equations for the tensile forces and so forth in the string. They isolated the string. They assumed that there's nothing else happening but the string and using the forces.

And they still teach the sophomore students to do it this way, they derived the string wave equation. First of all, there is no such thing as a tight string independently existing apart from a holder anywhere in the world. There never will be. There is, however, a tight string which has equal and opposite forces in the ends of the holder that's holding the string and creating the tension on the string. If you will apply the same approach and ask yourself the full question what system was perturbed?

It was not just the tight string. It was the tight string plus the body of the instrument. What comes about is that every transverse string wave that occurred the string, an equal and opposite, highly damped wave occurred down in the body of the instrument. Every guitar picker, which I'm a very poor one knows that the body of the instrument vibrates when you pluck the string. You depend on the characteristic of that for your sound.

What happened, though, by throwing away the holder and the anti wave in the holder? Every time a mathematician or a physicist writes a wave equation, he has thrown away half of the problem of the phenomena. The anti wave still exists, but he threw it somewhere, usually into a highly damp system and ignores it. The way he gets by with that at the end where he has now described his reactions with the single wave equation, the transverse wave equation, the other wave reappears, and he says, oh, that's Newton's Third Law reaction force, because it's always equal and opposite. Well, Newton's third law is not a law.

It's a description. It is not a mechanism for what causes something at all. If you add back in the wave that is missing, guess what you get? You get equal and opposite waves in the vacuum. These waves are, in fact, longitudinal waves.

They are more soundlike. And Tesla was right, and all the textbooks in the world are wrong. Now, let's turn that from talking sound. Let's turn it to electromagnetics. If I examine an atom and I see the complex assembly of dipoles, each dipole being The Electron charge and the piece of the positive charge of the nucleus, I find something very similar to the holder and the string.

That is, I have something very light, the electron which is perturbed, and I have Something Which is highly damp, the very heavy nucleus by the equal and opposite anti disturbance. And we still know that exists, but we call it Newton's Third Law. We just, invoke a Description, have no idea what causes it. But anyway, if the wave comes in from the vacuum and is intercepted by one of these dipoles, in addition to the disturbance, the string wave that we will see off of the electron end, we will have the anti wave, the recoil forces on the other end. And so always we get equal and opposite.

We do get the opposite wave. And what came in from the vacuum had both the separation between The Two charges caused The Separation Of The Two waves, just as the separation between the String and The Body of the instrument caused The Separation of the wave in any wave in the plucked string instrument. So we still have the same thing, and we still hold to the fact there is a longitudinal Wave in the vacuum, not just A single transverse wave. Now let us see what happens when we launch a wave now that we know that from an antenna. When I launch a wave from a physical antenna, the matter in the antenna is made of these same atoms and these same dipoles.

And in addition to launching the wave from the electron shells and the electron interactions, there is a highly damped anti wave launched at much less disturbance, highly reduced of the anti wave. But as soon as it emerges from the antenna, there is no longer any damping because there's no longer any heavy nuclear mass. And so immediately it pops to full shape and full size. And so we still have the longitudinal wave in the vacuum that we launch. Can I prove that in what we receive?

Yes, indeed, I can. And you must understand this if you ever understand Nikola Tesla. Now let me go to the reception of this wave in a circuit and I have some free electrons in my circuit. And in comes the wave from the vacuum. The electrons in the circuit are pushing against their brothers down the road, which pushes back, and it's restrained.

It had very difficult for it to move longitudinally. We know that today. We know that it only moves down the wire at something like 11ft/hour. The signal that moves down the wire at near light speed will have completely exited the solar system and gone on by that time. So, as you can see, we have a very sluggish electron restrained, which is spinning.

We know today when they wrote those equations, they didn't even have the notion of the electron. So it acts as a gyro and by gyro theory, right out of the book. When you longitudinally disturb a gyro that's restrained, it will process sideways. And all of our instruments measure and detect the electron precession waves. That's what we put on our oscilloscopes and what we read with our instruments.

And yes, indeed, gentlemen, we do detect the electron wiggle waves. And they are transverse waves. But a gyro reacts and processes at right angle to the actual disturbance, which proves that it is a longitudinal wave in the vacuum. If you do not believe that you must throw away all gyro theory. Tesla was right.

Every textbook in the US. Is Wrong. Maxwell simply assumed out of thin air, the transverse string wave, because that's what everybody was familiar with when he wrote the first equations. And it's never been changed to this day. So.

Was Tesla aware of this? And is this what Tesla was talking about when he talked about telephones? It was deeply involved in it. Tesla made several statements. For example, over and over where he said there are no transverse waves in the vacuum.

No hertz waves. The waves in the vacuum I have already proved, he said, is like the gas and the waves in it therefore are like sound waves. They are longitudinal waves. And he was indeed correct. Today.

For example, in modern quantum mechanics, there is a vacuum. It is a medium and it's a virtual particle flux. And so, indeed, the vacuum is a virtual gas by today's best physics. And Tesla was right. It is a longitudinal wave and I've just explained how it's split when it's received.

You do get what we measure with our instruments because of the electron precession and you also get the any wave at the same time proving that it was an extra wave there down in the nucleus in the materials which do recall and we just ignore it. We know it's there, but we just ignore it. Now, let's look, for example, at his statement of wireless transmission. Here. He was talking of the transmission of energy through the atmosphere or indeed, through space, without loss.

As a matter of fact. If that is true, then it already exists in nature. Tesla had rediscovered nature. As a matter of fact, today, in modern theory, we know that the energy in an electromagnetic wave transmitted is already conserved. If you take a wavelength at any length from an omni transmitter and you take the hemispherical shell of that wavelength times the entire surface area of that shell, the energy that's in that shell is the same as the energy in any other shell of any radius.

The energy is totally conserved and none of it is lost. We already know that that part is absolutely correct. The energy density course goes way down as the shell expands. So that part is unquestionable. Now, the question is, can we direct that and can we control it?

In a sense, if we do a laser beam, we do that. There's a better way to do it if we go to Whitaker's paper which was written in 1903 and some other papers have been written since then. Like by Zolkowski and by sue in 1993. Even Zolkowski in the strange thing comes about what we call the electrostatic scalar potential. That is pure voltage.

To simplify. It can be broken down into a bi directional set of wave pairs. One wave going one way, the other way. Time reversed and locked on it in space. So what we call just voltage or just potential has actually got a hidden set of incredible amount of waves going in both directions.

And not only we consider it just a fixed value at a point in space, but as a matter of fact, it's a tremendous energy flow. So what Tesla really discovered was how to combine the waves so that they eliminated the gradients. Technically speaking, the gradients opposed each other, but were still there. But now hidden the net gradient and the net force field was gone. We know today.

The other electromagnetics is still there. And we have an energy flow in both directions. So he simply found out how to do that. And yes, indeed, there is no loss in that kind of potential. If you make a beam of that, you can indeed transmit energy in a completely hidden fashion.

You can stick a normal meter right in the beam and it won't see a thing because there's no force field and you can transmit it at a distance. How effectively depends on the ability to make the beam how narrow you can make the beam and hold it together. And the other thing depends on a slight interaction with the atmosphere in the middle. You'll spill a little, but you can do it 98% or so, which I think is what Tesla said. Also, there's one other thing we must say about that.

There Is emerging In The Last Few years and Has Emerged in orthodox science at an advanced level what I would say is the very beginning. But it's moving pretty fast. Theory of force free fields and these are getting very close to what Tesla was doing. They haven't added the anti wave back in yet, but they're getting close. At least they're eliminating the overall force and doing something else with the electromagnetics that remains.

The other thing which must be brought to bear, and I must do this very precisely to understand Tesla is the fact that, for example, if you read Jackson and classical Electrodynamics, you will find when he's first setting out in the first so many pages, he points out very clearly that this theory, this very beautiful theory, only holds when the background is reasonably well behaved, reasonably linear. He points out that if the background becomes nonlinear that you must then turn to the emerging field or the field that has emerged in nonlinear optics. Nonlinear optics in some fashions is an unfortunate term because the mechanisms are fundamental. They apply to all frequencies and they apply to all kinds of waves. It's a matter of when the background gets sufficiently nonlinear to induce these phenomena.

So as long as you continue to try to keep the background linear which we're great at doing we try really to sweep out these phenomena. Tesla had stumbled into this area very early on and mastered part of this area long before the terminology I'm using existed. He knew how to do number one, what today we call phase conjugation. He knew how to do what we call pumped phase conjugation. And he even knew how to do what we call technically today amongst very few people self targeting.

So he had some tools at his fingertips which he could use on the lab bench and build equipment he worked on an enormous number of years on which could do things that the normal electromagnetics cannot do. We do some of them today in nonlinear optics. Now, let me talk about self targeting so you can understand some of his transmission without loss. One of the problems we have like, for example, in something like missile defense if I have a spaceborne laser, let me say, and I have a rising enemy booster 10,000 miles away I've got a problem. I've got lots of power.

I can put the laser beam onto the booster but I must hold it on one particular spot 15,000 miles away. On that exact spot, long enough time, called dwell time to burn through the casing and destroy the booster. So I have a problem. How do I hold this beam there and keep it from wandering around on the body of the booster? Well, it turns out you can do it very easily with a thing called self targeting.

Every signal that comes from there, if I phase conjugate and transmit a phase conjugate replica it goes unerringly back to the spot including it lead it a little bit because the component of its motion was on the beam that came to me. And so if I continue to do that, iteratively I can hold the beam exactly on the booster and burn through it. So by self targeting, I can hold a laser beam on a point. It doesn't have to be a booster, a defense or anything. I can hold a beam of energy onto a point that I have at a distance.

That's the main thing. By self targeting and in my own opinion, I reached the opinion that Tesla in his telegeodyodynamics, had discovered how to do that with the mechanical waves. First of all, he could transmit the full wave through the Earth and he could cause the thing when it came back to be face conjugated. Once he had a reflection from anywhere, he could narrow immediately into that point and put all his energy to that point. And today there is a theoretical basis for it.

I couldn't build such equipment, but I mean, there's a theoretical way to go to do that. And apparently, according to his statements, that's my interpretation of what he was doing, he was doing iterative phase conjugation, and therefore able to focus his energy regardless of what kind of route it followed, to the exact point he wanted it to go to on the other side of the Earth. But now, was this theoretical or was this ever demonstrated? I believe he demonstrated it. For example, my personal opinion and I certainly cannot prove this in the court of law and I want to label it as a personal opinion.

My personal opinion, because of certain time sequences of some of his statements and incidents which actually happened, I think as a last desperate measure, while his installation at Long Island was still intact and still in operation, I believe he fired the electrical pulse of energy that blew down that forest in Siberia. Oliver Nicholson has done some very good work, for example, to look at the admittedly circumstantial evidence. We can't prove it at all. I just happen to hold to the thesis that it was his last ditch effort to try to solve his problems that he'd lost with Morgan by focusing attention onto the absolute power that could be unleashed with this. And it failed.

Nobody was interested. I was very curious about the time correlation between his installation still existing on Long Island, still in operation, and this Siberian particular blast and its characteristics, which it was not a nuclear weapon, it was not a meteorite. So in doing a little work on that, thanks to Oliver Nicholson, he sent me some very good information on that. And it's not the kind of thing you can ever say with any certainty happened, certainly not. But there is at least circumstantial evidence that he may have done that.

In speaking of nuclear energy and Tesla's objection to it and some of the things he had in mind with energy, it's pretty obvious that Tesla. Not only Knew how, but advocated Very strongly that you could do this electromagnetically, and you could do it cleanly and cheaply without all the nuclear residue and the nuclear waste and the long term effects and this kind of thing. It's tough to dispose of nuclear waste. Now, I have mixed feelings on this. For example, I am a nuclear engineer.

I have a master's degree from Georgia Tech, but I'm not a practicing nuclear engineer, nor have I ever been. The army really didn't see fit to Let Me do that. Nonetheless, I know a little bit about what they're about and so forth. And a nuclear power plant is not a Great breakthrough in technology at all. It's a great heater.

And what we really do, we use the nuclear reactions to produce heat, and we either Boil water and make steam, or We Just Use The Hot water. And then it's the heat energy that we must convert to provide our electric power. Now, the demand for electric power is great enough. It's a Big enough problem, as everybody is aware, if we must continue to furnish this electric power at our present science level, there's no really acceptable alternative yet to the nuclear power plant. However, it doesn't mean that that's the preferable solution by any means.

I think it's preferable the Other way, which is why I work so hard to try to do it electromagnetically. Now, at this very conference that we're at, when this interview is being made, I'm going to introduce what is almost the final results of my 30 years of work in this area. And what we have done is very similar to what Tesla did, and he provided the codes, the clues on which to look. What I've done is taken him to heart and convinced myself with lot of investigation and study. The waves in the vacuum are longitudinal.

So when electromagnetic waves break loose from their mass restriction and holding, they are longitudinal waves. And when they get Tied up in mass, they get split into these two waves, which one of which is acting upon the electrons to cause them to move sideways. And they slip A Little bit every Once in a while down the wire, creates Newton's Third law reaction in the nucleus. Well, when you go through enough analysis of this, what you really find and what, as of Friday of this week yesterday, I have filed my associates, and I should say have filed a very fundamental patent on the creation. In a circuit of longitudinal waves to flow the energy freely, literally, in the Tesla fashion, and then use it separately in the load to power a load.

Technically, it's still called Displacement current. What we have done, we have split the normal current, technically DQ/DT, into two components, one being displacement current DPH DT, and one being that mass slippage every once in a while of these processing electrons down the wire. And what we really have done is used a barrier invented by Bill Fogel to stop the mass flow which is all the workflow the rate at which energy is being lost in the circuit. We allow only the flow past Fogal's semiconductor which is a patented device patented in 92. And then we use this free energy flow which does not disperse.

Conventional theory already recognizes displacement current as pure energy transport without losses. For example, the way to use it and I want everybody to know so they can check it. If I then run the displacement current through the primary of its step up transformer I produce ordinary garden variety magnetic field and store that free energy in that magnetic field that couples to the secondary which then couples to the electrons in that circuit through the load which are now free to move. I don't restrain them, and I pump the electrons through the load absolutely conventionally and do power in a load. So what I have is absolute conservation of energy.

But I do not conserve work loss, the dissipation of the energy. I take the energy in almost freely from the battery or power source. In this case, it would be an oscillator because I'm speaking AC. We can do a DC. I strip off and block the component of the current that's responsible for all losses in the circuit.

Then I take the displacement current and I gather it and store it, in this case, magnetic field couple it to the other side and discharge it through the load completely separately. None of my load discharge current goes back through my source. No degradation is done to the source. And yes, indeed, you can legitimately do over unity electrical systems. And it's exactly analogous to a heat pump which is a proven overunity system that we use in our homes.

I just told the world how to build a free energy machine, is what I told. Okay? Now, if we assume that what I've explained about the way we have approached the use of the energy which is freely available from the vacuum vacuum energy is now acceptable. Even physical review thanks to some fine work by people of the stature of Hal Putoff, for example. It's very straightforward, very technical and it's now an acceptable thing.

We know the vacuum and it is accepted. It's filled with energy. And Tesla always said that it was. So once again, Tesla has been vindicated by modern quantum mechanics after all of these years. I think if we look at some of the other incidents as for example, Tesla talked about being able to tap the energy of cosmic rays.

He talked, in fact, his nephew reported as a child riding in the car where Tesla had put in an engine of some kind which was self powered. So we find then later references to Tesla which suggest the harnessing of energy from today we would say from the vacuum. So does that sound reasonable to us today from where I'm coming from? Yes, indeed, because that's exactly what we have done. We take it in the potential across the source.

We simply use the hidden wave flow from the Whitaker stuff. We want to extract that and use it in this displacement current form while it's still energy flow and none of it's being lost. We do not wish to make work until we store it up and discharge it in the load separately. We do it just like a heat pump. And I really think that's probably the way Tesla did it in that car engine.

He also knew there was enormous energy in what was called cosmic rays, and he connected that with a whole idea of the energetic vacuum, we would say today. And I think that's just one of the ways he referred to it. For example, we know from T. Henry Moray's work that he was inspired by Tesla's statement that the energy of the ether itself was literally filled with rivers of energy, free for the taking. It inspired him and his great undertaking today.

The fashion is to sweep that aside and say, well, you know, I know what he was doing. Tesla just didn't know he was using this stuff that I know all about. And so I talk about the Earth ionospheric wave guide and resonance, and that's not what he was doing at all. You can't do free energy for the whole world with Earth atmospheric resonance. It isn't going to happen.

We know about that. It isn't going to happen. You know, another area that often occurs in discussions of Tesla is the notion of weaponization, of Tesla's true work that's relatively unknown to modern science, but could probably be known to some very sharp people that looked into it because they wanted to make weapons. Tesla certainly spoke of a very large series of very powerful weapons. I think that's a reasonable thing.

And let's approach it this way. Certainly I'm on record as saying the weapons exist and that several nations have weaponized them. Let me explain a little bit about what I'm talking about and a little bit key points where you might look. We know for a fact that, for example, T. Henry Moray with his power supply was visited by the Russians.

And we know that the Russians tried to, in fact, take it. They even tried to kidnap t henry Moray. And so we know that the Russians very early on were interested in things like free energy right out of the vacuum, and they were interested in weapons. There are even reports that they contacted Tesla, and I'm sure they would have. He certainly had plenty of headlines.

So if we have that, then as a starting point, we have a situation where in the late 30s particularly, and just prior to World War II, there was at least some kind of interest in contact. We know in the case of T. Henry Moore, they very probably got the exact blueprints how to build the device. Maybe a couple of things missing in here and there, but a really good lab could have eventually put it together from there. Then comes along world war II with a big interruption for everyone.

Okay? At that time, after world war II, we have a very strange situation which exists now. First thing that exists, we have suddenly thrust upon the world seen the atomic bomb. If we had not done so, we would have had a bloodbath when we tried to invade Japan. So many lives were saved by the use of the atomic bomb, and I am not an atomic bomb apologist.

Many people who are here today would not be here if their fathers had been killed by the invasion of Japan. And depending on who you believe, the casualties would have been about 1 million on our side alone. Anyway, we arrived at this state in the world where now there's a very powerful weapon which suddenly frustrates one of the things that Stalin has planned to do. Stalin, of course, had a spy in the atomic bomb project. He knew we were getting ready, so it wasn't a big surprise to him at Pottsdam when Truman told him that we had just exploded the first atomic bomb.

But he had been planning after Europe, after the European war and everything wound down, he would hold his armies for about two years. We always beat our swords back into Plowshares and go home. Historically, it's the last war. Never going to be another one. Unfortunately, human nature doesn't change, and so there is another one.

And Stalin in about two years, would keep all his armies intact and simply take over Europe in about six weeks. That was his plan. However, now he couldn't do that, because if he masked his forces, we would have bombed him back into the stone age. So he had a problem. There is at least a reason to believe that stalin called in his scientific heads when he got back from Potsdam and really laid the law down to them.

He said, the destiny of communism has been frustrated by this great new American development. That isn't going to be the last great breakthrough. But I tell you, gentlemen, one thing. The next one is going to be soviet. So he forcefully ordered them to search for the next great area, in my opinion, to look for for that breakthrough, because thereafter you find soviet scientists combing through everything.

For example, they took the entire scientific literature of the west, loaded on copies onto boats, took it back to Russia, set up huge translations, institutes staffed with very highly qualified scientists, and their job was to go through, look for anything anomalous. The anomalies they laid aside. Then they went through them with a fine tooth comb to see what looked promising. And of course, they would have found such things. We've never done anything like that.

They would have found such things as the whitaker papers. A lot of marvelous things I haven't even found yet that's in the literature that nobody's ever paid an attention to. So my thesis is that that's what happened. They started into this area for building a new superweapon immediately after World War II. Certainly they would have resurrected this More stuff they had gotten out of T.

Henry Moreay's lab through their agent. They would have probably resurrected other things. I don't even know about that's. Just conjecture, but probably so. At any rate, they did start such a program.

The Russians have always been the greatest nonlinear mathematicians in the world. They were at the beginning. They are to this day. And so they would have seen much more clearly into the nonlinear aspects of everything we're talking about than American scientists had seen to date. Which means they would have picked up what today we call the optical type functioning, which means they would have picked up the longitudinal waves.

They certainly falsified general relativity theory only later, many years later, they openly publish the fact that it's wrong and show why it's wrong and become recognized critics of the conventional general relativity in this country. We did exactly the opposite. We defended it to the last man. So they went much deeper, I think, during this period into these areas than we did. And I think they started building because, as you know from my own previous publications, I put together independently a rather large body of evidence, admittedly circumstantial, but real nonetheless.

That can only be explained by the testing of such weapons. There is absolutely no other explanation for it. Now, I could be wrong on one incident, but 200 of exactly the same kind, I think not. So the evidence is overwhelming. You even hear now, their own leaders, like Zaranovsky recently has referred to these weapons as the Ellipton weapons.

There is no question today that the Soviet Union has these weapons. And if what I put together is correct, and I'm absolutely convinced it is, three other nations of the world also developed those weapons and resoundingly checked the Soviet Union. The other three are friendly to the United States, not hostile. And I think that played one great part in the fall of the Soviet empire because their original target date, as I brought out, had been 85 to achieve the freedom to move and do what they wished in the world in 1985. And they met the schedule, as I've adequately reported.

But once checked then we have a very strange situation now. Communism falls because of its financial shortcomings, and they just flat can't keep it glued together anymore. And in the dissolution here, we have entered what I think is a much more dangerous world than anything we ever thought of. Three other nations today are indeed working on what I call the Tesla weapons or really scalar electromagnetic weapons. And these nations are not really friendly to the US.

At all. So it's a much more dangerous world that has emerged. The nuclear control that was executed by the Soviet Union has now probably been diluted. If you're careful, you can hire some Soviet scientists right off the project. Many nations today are developing nuclear weapons and they don't have to go through the pain we did.

They're hiring people who already know how to do that and have done so. So very shortly you will see emerging throughout the so called Third World, as it's so loosely referred to, you will see nuclear weapons. You will see the extended scud, for example, being developed in North Korea aided by the Chinese, and it's being expropriated to the Mideast. And in my opinion, you will see a nuclear and biological warfare in the Middle East in three or four years, somewhere on that time range, I could be off a year or two, but it isn't going to be forever. So to me, it's a much more dangerous world that we live in.

Particularly if we see the advent in addition to the nukes and the biological warfare, which is certainly frightening enough, if we see the advent of several other nations now possessing weapons of the ilken power spoken of, although at a little bit obligedly by Nikola Tesla. I would like to explain the basis for the weapons because it's open. If you take the two papers by Whitaker that I'm so fond of quoting and all my stuff, you will find that the first one tells you if you do it in reverse, tells you how to make, if you wish, a scalar beam by simply assembling the necessary wave set. The second paper will tell you that if you then take two such scalar beams, actually hidden multi waves and interfere them at a distance, yes, scalar interferometry really exists. It's just really multiple wave interferometry.

When you understand the wave sets, what will occur at a distance will be the reappearance of the electromagnetic gradients, which we call force fields. In other words, you'll create the electromagnetics at a distance if you bias your ground potential of your transmitters higher than the distant focal point, what we call energy heat energy, exhaustion of energy, which should be called work heat energy will emerge in the other area and scatter at that area. Energy will go in here and scatters work out the other end. It's just like you had a direct pipeline at the distance. Is this indicative of Tesla?

Of course. If you bias your projectors the other way, the energy flows in the other direction. In other words, you extract energy from out there and the energy you have to do something to collect and dissipate the heat back at the transmitter end. Every transmitter is now a two way transmitter of energy. I can make it go in one direction by biasing or go in the other at will.

The weapon implications of that alone are extremely frightening and extremely powerful. And now several nations are involved in developing it right, straightforward to the hilt. Very shortly we will have an even more frightening world emerging. The other thing you can do with it, which I think Tesla alluded to, at least in a few cases when you do these things with the potentials rather than with the force fields, you actually involve time. You produce time effects or you can produce effects on anything that exists in time because you affect the time dimension.

When you do this, you can affect thought and you can affect human beings where they live because thought occurs in time. It occupies time. It's just not spatial, but it is timelike. As you can probably see. If indeed the world has already acquired several nations the ability to build the defensive weapons in the area that has been discussed here, the Tesla type weapons, then there's really no longer a great compelling need to do any further weapons work by any private citizen.

So there are some other very compelling areas, however, of great need for humanity that are directly involved with Tesla's approach and Tesla's work that cry out for research and development. Two of these areas are fantastic. We must have clean energy sources. We must have some source to provide our needed electrical power cleanly and freely without polluting this entire biosphere. Everybody's concerned with that.

The way to do it is not to put in harsh laws that stop all workers and everything like this and go into absolute dictatorship. That's not the way to do it. The way to do it is to do it scientifically by striking for a great new breakthrough to where it can be done and done cheaply and cleanly. So that's one area that is important and deserves the utmost effort that can be put on it. Another area that is assuming ever more increasing urgency is the area of the medical needs.

Allopathic medicine is failing. The bugs are all changing and they're becoming immune to all our antibiotics. The orthodox scientific people are saying this openly in their journals and their articles and their editorials. Even a newspaper and Newsweek and so forth are picking it up and writing articles about it. Within five years, you will have a serious risk of your life if this trend continues just to go to the hospital.

The number is already over 10,000 per year. I don't know the exact number since 92, but it's already well above 10,000 per year that die in the hospital because the infection that they have absolutely cannot be controlled. There is one kind of staff, for example, that nothing that we have will affect. And it has about a 30% lethality, I'm told. So three out of ten who contact that die in the hospital.

These kinds of things are increasing. You now have very well recognized scientists in the regular medical scientific community saying allopathic medicine is failing and there's nothing to replace it. You cannot develop the vaccines or new compounds fast enough to even keep up with them. We have lost that battle. We must change the medical approach.

The medical approach. If you use the extended electromagnetics, if I may use that term that Tesla was talking about, there then occurs phenomena which can be used to control and change and heal almost any infectious disease whatsoever, including a genetic disease where the genetics have changed in the cells, such as AIDS. Now, that is not an idle statement. That is a very rigorous statement based on some very rigorous scientific work done in France in the late sixty s and early 70s by Antoine Priori and a team of scientists that gathered and worked with him. And these were eminent scientists world known.

For example, one of them was Robert Curier, head of the biology section of the French Academy of Science, and also the Secretary of Perpetual of the French Academy. At the same time poetryl an eminent scientist world known many such scientists worked directly with the inventor Antoine Priori. Priori completed his doctoral thesis, which was rejected because of the violent opposition of the medical establishment. But he demonstrated under rigorous scientific protocols that you could completely cure, almost with ridiculous ease, terminal tumors in lab animals. He did it hundreds of times under all the proper rigid controls.

I mean, Priori personally sent his own personal assistant to do the tumor graphs and ensure that everything was absolutely impeccable. Very simple. You take 15 rats, 30 rats, 15 each. One control group, one test group. All the rats get inoculated or engrafted with the same terminal tumor, they're going to be dead with 100% certainty in 30 days.

The 15 get treated, the other 15 don't. They stay in exactly the same room, same food, same everything. The 15 treated all get well. The 15 not treated all die. With another provision you can then take another group of 15 rats with the same tumors grafted to them.

You can take one drop of blood from each of the rats that got well and put in one of the other rats and they will all get well from that single drop of blood. The ordinary medical establishment was furious when they changed the setup of the French government to a leftist government in the mid seventy s. The Priori team was just completing a very large installation with permission to treat human patients with terminal cancer and leukemia and so forth. Now he surreptitiously treated some humans before and cured their cancers and leukemias. The problem was nobody could understand how it worked.

We didn't even have at the time the knowledge of this new parts of phase conjugate optics that we needed to understand it. It's no wonder they couldn't understand it, nobody could. And so when they suppressed that, they withdrew the funding from the project. It was funded by the French government. And when the government changed, they withdrew the funding.

All the work ceased. The equipment later was destroyed. Priori later died. At any rate, this is something absolutely legitimate. It did use the type of electromagnetic extension that I've talked about and if we open up that extension, there now is the explanation available of how it worked.

And yes, we can cure such diseases if a proper scientific development program can be mounted and funded and it will all be based in part upon the work of Nikola Tesla. Often there's been a great curiosity about this strange thing the Russians suddenly injected onto the world. They had done some pretesting. But suddenly, on July 4, 1976, for a bicentennial present for us, the Soviets opened up some great new transmitters in the communication band, which, because of the chirping sound and the sound just like a woodpecker's bill hitting a block of wood, was immediately dubbed woodpecker by all the ham radio operators who had it interfering with their communications. And so this was really massive communication, massive transmitters, lots and lots of power and nobody could figure out what in the world was going on.

It made no sense because certainly the signals as seen could do over the rise in radar work which you normally put in that same frequency band. But there were also apparently lots of characteristics which didn't fit what you would do if you were designing something with just over the rising radar at all be no need for such complexity. So there's been a lot of discussion on it and I guess the official realization was that calling it was to say it's just simply over the rising radars. Well, they built a lot of them. But if you look at it through the eyes of the scalar interferometry and I mentioned the two references and have cited them in various papers, there are other work along that line too.

If that approach is used in what seems to be what Tesla had done, if you use the Tesla approach to interpret it. Now one is dealing with scalar interferometry and dealing with something that can do some rather astounding potential weapon effects with the in Tesla interpretation. One of the things that would result from that line of weapons, assuming they are used as scalar interferometry weapons, one of the great things that would emerge from them would be to produce controlled energy at a distance. For example, great huge balls of controlled electromagnetic energy, or if you pulse it, great blasts of electromagnetic energy at a distance. I mentioned the business of biasing the transmitters where you can produce either heat like an explosion or you could produce a cold explosion, the sudden explosive withdrawal of energy from the distant area.

And in books cited incidents that are representative of what one would find if those incidents actually were occurring on that kind of scale. The incidents are there, they're real, they're documented, they're not just Tom Bearden. So there is a good solid set of admittedly circumstantial evidence that the woodpecker signals, because of all the phenomena that can be associated in the same time frame since they turned on these phenomena very strongly suggest that this set of weapons is not just over the rising radars at all, but are really Tesla weapons systems. And if they are, all the rest follows. They have one other frightening area.

If this thesis is true, that is almost mind boggling. There is a Soviet physicist, scientist named Koznashev. And Koznashev has produced a series of experiments in two Soviet military institutes before the fall there that showed that you could transmit any sort of disease form between cells, any sort of infectious disease, or you can radiate one sample with nuclear radiation, gamma radiation, for example, or deadly poison or infect them with viruses. You can transmit between cellular cultures into another cell, another sample from the same culture, the same disease, electromagnetically, although the organisms won't necessarily be there. That works in literature if you pursue it.

Koshnashev has several books out now that are available since the Russian system has loosened up a bit. That work has been replicated at the University of Marburg, for example. In Germany. It has been replicated University of Sydney and Australia. And it has been replicated by at least one researcher here in the United States.

He's trained to say if there are no force fields, there's no electromagnetics. He ignores the potential that's left. He just sweeps it away and throws it away from where we're coming from with the Tesla approach. That is the active part. That's the part that is being interfered within the bodies or whatever to cause whatever you wish to cause.

If we couple it with the cosnosiav stuff, we are saying that such scalar transmitters in interferometry within the US. Embassy could indeed have produced any sort of disease they wish. However, it would have very strange signatures. Let me explain the signatures and how such signatures actually came about. First of all, when Nixon went as vice president to Russia and this was first detected, he was going to visit some nuclear installations and they carried Geiger counters and it was detected on the Geiger counter.

It's an ionization device. It detects the ionization and discharge of its own gases. And anything that'll ionize its gas, it will detect. It doesn't have to be nuclear radiation. And so they thought at first that it was deadly nuclear radiation because all the counters went off.

Indeed it was not. They were irradiating the president with this stuff, with the Tesla stuff to see if we knew what was going on.

That's a beautiful intelligence probe. You pick out a high level target like the president or the embassy, you radiate and do some things that are obvious, not too bad, that are obvious so they can't be missed. And then you see what happens when the system goes bananas trying to figure out what's going on. And by their actions, there's no way to fake it. You either tell them you know what's going on by.

Your action or you show them you don't know what's going on there's no way to get out of it's 100% certain which very few things in intelligence are. However, if I go back to the embassy where many health changes and diseases and so for three ambassadors died of a leukemia like illness, eventually these diseases occurred only within the embassy in those areas where the force fields were absent and the potentials were there. And the Johns Hopkins researchers did a beautiful job. They were expert guys of establishing the force field electromagnetic pattern. And since not a single case occurred in that area that's by the normal electromagnetics then reached the conclusion that therefore could not possibly be the microwave radiation actually, that's a false conclusion.

If the radiation played no part whatsoever and you had that many changes occurred the ODS are extremely high that some of those would have occurred in the area where there were force fields and some didn't. Since that did not occur it is a 100% correlation to the Tesla area, to the area where the potentials existed and the force fields did not. And I'm sorry, they reached exactly the wrong conclusion because the model they applied failed them. These were able scientists using only the conventional model and the model actually showed that it was the other stuff but led them to conclude properly for their model that it couldn't possibly be the electromagnetics. That's just one instance.

So the woodpecker then would apply, be able to apply because of so many signals. The scalar stuff we might not even see with our normal detectors but yet it could do exactly the same thing, for example, in the United States alone. And what does that imply? If we are not too far out into left field here, if there's really a ground, as I've tried to describe here, if there really is a theoretical ground here for the use of those weapons in a Tesla mode, and the use of the Kosnashiev knowledge and experimental results in here, apparently confirmed by what happened in the US. Embassy then those radiators which are active to this day not in the conventional sense you got to have a different detector.

Those radiators could conceivably create within a mass population almost the instantaneous spread of mass diseases of all kind. They would be anomalous. You'd be dying, for example, a bubonic plague and you wouldn't have the organism. But it represents if that part is true it represents a biological weapon of incredible implications for population warfare. I hope to God I'm wrong.

I don't think I am. One of the questions for anybody who tries to take the Tesla view and tries to do it anywhere halfway scientifically, one of the questions that certainly comes out of all this other work on what kind of possible weapons could have been built and what possible uses and demonstrations have been made, the question emerges what about warfare in the future? Well, what I can do is give you my opinion and leave it up to each person to evaluate that as they see fit.

We have certain trends, however, that certainly are possible. We see with certainty other nations developing nuclear weapons shortly. Almost everybody that wants to have a nuclear weapon and is a nation of any little size at all is going to have one. I would characterize that by the fact that weapons of mass destruction have now passed out of chess playing hands. In other words, logical hands into some hands which are irrational.

And to me, that's a much more dangerous world. There is another suppose. The fear all analysts have is the suitcase delivery system. You simply slip in the weapon parts and assemble it say in New York City or Chicago or someplace. And perhaps the next time the US.

Decides to intervene somewhere in the Middle East or somewhere the terrorists then blow several of these weapons incredible damage to the United States. This would suggest an area where not only have the great nations been involved in strategic deterrence, if I might use that term, which is now falling out of fashion, but all the small nations, or a lot of them. Will be able to provide a very positive strategic deterrence to even great nations by the threat of nuclear warfare. Clandestine warfare, as I described. Or biological weapons, which are cheap and everybody can have and build.

It is certainly a much more dangerous weapon that has emerged. World that has emerged and the weapon spread now is just seeping out just like a torrent. There's no stopping it. In these kinds of weapons one doesn't know what will be the future in the slow leakage that seems to be going on in the Tesla weapons. Certainly, it simply adds to the power at the very best for us, the threats and at the worst, it adds an impossible threat.

So the world is facing a set of dangerous possibilities dangerous threats to us all, to everybody to every man, woman and child. Because the civilian population is no longer immune or even exempted from these kinds of things. We're facing a world of possibility of multiple nations, multiple kinds of irrational groups being able to apply enormous weapons of enormous implications to even the civilian population. Our military, for example is facing a situation where, with a lot of development in biological warfare if suddenly new agents that you have no knowledge of whatsoever are thrust upon you have no antidotes you have no effective methods of treatment and these are fairly rapidly acting agents. Let's say they kill in two days rapid infection.

I'm just taking an example. You couldn't possibly come up with anything to do anything with the normal stuff during that time. The only alternative will be the extended electromagnetic treatment because then you could treat it without identifying the agent and cure it before it even came out in illness in your troops. Otherwise, even your military forces face decimation by sudden unknown agents which they are unable to counter. So surprise attack becomes an ever more dangerous thing in a lot more dangerous hands.

The world is much more dangerous today for a much more positive application of, shall I say, Tesla's extension to electromagnetics that he was using though not technically describing so well something that's much more beneficial or can be to mankind humankind rather than destructive means one should focus on the imminent advent of practical over unity electromagnetic devices. These are devices which can be closed looped to run themselves and produce useful power in the load for one impact which is highly beneficial. It's obvious, the most casual observer that the use of such systems where the power to run it is actually extracted from the vacuum itself. If carefully used, there will be no damage to the biosphere and we will certainly eliminate an incredible amount gradually. It won't happen overnight but we will gradually eliminate an incredible amount of burning of fossil fuels.

There's still a need for all the fossil fuels only not as fuel. The chemical needs alone for medicines and materials and so forth to benefit mankind are enormous. But certainly we will stop all the exhausts and pollutants from those from the burning of those fuels from entering the atmosphere. It just won't be happening anymore to the extent it is now on any scale. It will allow us to take funds, for example, on something like into what I like to think could be a more sane world and a much more protective of the environment of our children and of our children's children.

Now, in all candor, I must add one danger. If unrestrictedly used when you produce excess energy of this type from the vacuum, right in the vacuum in a local area, if you produce a very large amount, particularly if you do it very suddenly in that region, you have a curvature of local spacetime, and there can be biological effects from that that we are presently not quite capable of fully explaining or knowing. There's going to have to be some careful incorporation of the devices so that we use care. We do not inflict any kind of damage on anybody or anything like that. So with reasonable scientific care we can prevent any such thing.

And we should do that. We should incorporate such systems into our normal utility transmissions across the lines. The lines are there. The maintenance of them is already there. The facilities are already there.

They're already connected to the homes. It would just be nice if gradually we didn't have to burn so many fossil fuels and gradually the power price could come down cheaper and cheaper. But meanwhile everybody stays working and everybody stays involved. But what we really wish to eliminate is, say, an older person in New York City cold in the winter, very limited income. Can't pay the utility bill very well.

So has to keep the power down, freezing, eating dog food. We must do better than that, and we can. And the Tesla technology will allow us to do better than that. So it must be done. To understand Tesla, you must understand one other remarkable ability that he had that none of his peers had then or now.

We can only do with great computing simulation centers. From the time he was an early child, tesla had the capability to visualize something so intensely and so vividly that he simply couldn't tell the difference between that and a real object until he was about twelve years old, and he finally found a way to distinguish the difference. But this unique ability that he had enabled him to visualize a system in all of its parts working together, turn it over and upside down and inside out and watch everything function on any level. That today we would do with a large cat cam system or we would do with a very large supercomputer in a very large simulation facility. So Tesla also was the world's first great simulating computer center.

Using his own brain, none of his cohorts or his colleagues or his peers had any such ability. Tesla would build a device a hundred times in his head, changing it all the time, until he got all the parts working perfectly in his simulation, and then he would build it on the bench. And most times it would work right away. He had already built it a hundred times. We do exactly that technique today in many fields of endeavor, with great effort, with great cost, big computing centers.

Tesla could do it in his head.

One final question often remains about Nikola Tesla. It's difficult to put oneself in a situation, to believe that he could possibly have done such great things, and they have passed completely away into either secrecy or being lost or just simply abandoned. So a puzzling question remains how on earth could this happen? Suppose it's true, how could it happen?

Actually, it's not too difficult to understand how, but it takes a bit of background and appreciation for the times. First of all, put yourself in Tesla's day when we're talking about installation on Long Island. It hasn't been very long since Custer's last stand.

We're talking about just prior to Marconi's transmission of signals across the Atlantic. We're talking about a time when only recently, in just the end of the 1880s and the early 1890s, has electromagnetics abandoned the quaternion theory and gone to the vector theory of Oliver Heavyside, largely, and with some contribution by Hertz and Gibbs. There are only at the time, prior to the turn of the century, possibly about 40 scientists in the world who really understand electromagnetics at the top level. There are more than that who are, we might say, followers. But the shapers there's only about no such thing as big government science.

There are no large government organizations funding science anywhere. A scientist was a relatively poor person. He wasn't impoverished, but he certainly had no income. Like a businessman. There was no place to get grants or to get funding for research.

All science is patronized. Somebody has to pay the freight. And many of the avenues we are familiar with today, most of them simply did not exist. The only way that a scientist or call him an inventor such as Tesla could in fact even dream of supporting himself, he had to, number one, discover the thing. He had to keep it very, very secret and patent it.

He had to keep it secret until his patent actually was issued up some money. A scientist at a university who received a $2,000 grant from an industrious was in great shape. Think of the economics of the time. An average person might make $500 a year when we speak of $150,000, an enormous sum of money in that time, but we're speaking of a time when there's still not many checks and balances on the great capitalists. Literally, they buy the politicians at will.

The control of financial power had little opposition in the courts or anything else. It was so bad at the time that there was a violent labor movement going on against the very same industrials who kept manipulating the stock market and causing it to change and causing inflation and terribly hurting everybody. Anarchy was even a serious threat because of the belief that all government was evil prevailing into the laboring class. An anarchist even assassinated the president. While Lincoln is working on long I mean, while Tesla is working on long island.

So one must appreciate the tenor of the times. Also, one must appreciate the communication industry. There were very few telephones.

The telegraph, which wasn't widespread, but the telegraph existed. That was the main route of communication in newspapers, books, to some extent. The journals were all pretty well controlled. Most of them by the scientific community was already very much jealous of Tesla. So you don't publish in the real scientific journals.

You have to publish in something like what Today would call Scientific American, like electrical experiment or something. Many of the publications were letter to the editor. So an inventor or a person trying to make a living in science as an independent person had a terrible job and a terrible task. There was a great secrecy clamp on him just because of the situation and tenor of the times. This accounted really to a large degree for Tesla's secrecy.

Most other inventors who had not yet become highly successful or whatever were also very secret or who still needed large funding. So secrets and secretiveness was the order of the day. Only when you put it in this background can you understand then how easy it is to suppress. It's not printed in the newspaper. His single exposition of receiving signals from outer space caused most of the news media to simply swing over and go against him.

The very news media who had simply made him a star, so to speak, before now couldn't get enough to get on him and continue to hound him and call him every name in the books. And so, from that single remark, a great drastic shift in the labeling of Nikola Tesla came about. Science itself is unforgiving. There is many histories of scientist persecution of other scientists with whom they disagreed. The system is very prone to either destroy, condemn, or bury any scientist who seriously disagrees with it to this day.

Well documented. We could make another documentary movie on just that. However, here was a preeminent example of a disagreement with the current scientific control. And the scientific control was adamant that he get wiped out of the books and he get labeled a lunatic. And that's exactly what happened.

He wound up with his name, Tesla, attached to a coil, and one unit of measurement named after his name. And as far as the scientist was concerned, that was enough. He didn't deserve anything else, most of them. So the scientific community rejected him. After Morgan turned his back, the financial community rejected him.

Here was a loner, then again, absolute loner. What was he to do? Exactly what he did. Retire to his hotel room and feed the pigeons and think grand dreams live on a small pittance which kept life and them together from his native Yugoslavia. And once a year have a press conference where he spoke of all the grand things that he thought of and he wished to have happened, but at least overtly, as far as we know, overtly.

Never again was Nikola Tesla to ever have a chance to attempt any of the great things that always surge through his restless mind, I guess, in summary of all of this, what does Tesla represent to the future? Particularly benevolently? Let's forget the weapons. What can come from Tesla's work that's been yet unrealized, that can benefit humankind everybody on the face of this Earth? There are some very positive benefits that loom.

The greatest thing that Nikola Tesla ever did was to continue to point out that the present electromagnetics model is seriously flawed and that electromagnetics is much more unlimited. Think for a moment of the service that the limited electromagnetics we have has been put to. Think of all the electronics, the communication industry, the power systems. It's changed the life of every person on the face of the Earth. Consider for just a moment what an extension to what you can do can add to the benefit of everybody everywhere for all time.

And I think when one ponders and considers that implication, then the full importance and the full implication of Nikola Tesla yet to be realized will indeed be realized.

What a phenomenal, absolutely phenomenal video from Thomas Bearden explaining Nikola Tesla. I see a lot of parallels between what I discovered in regards to weather modification, the electromagnetic radiation that is, radio waves and other means ionization and what Tesla discovered. Only the difference is I went public with it. I didn't keep it secret as he talked about in Tesla's work, and how they had to keep it secret because other people would basically rip them off and then either suppress it or try to sell it, et cetera. And that was the name of the game up until pretty much currently, I would say even in the beyond, most likely ran into this a lot.

Now, again, I'm not seeking patents and trying to get financing or anything. I took my discoveries to the world in regards to weather modification, electromagnetic radiation wise, and that's now been proved. It's now a drop down choice on the Noa weather modification site that they put up last year. In 2021, NOAA put up a new weather modification site, and number eight on the list of must be reported is using lasers and other forms of electromagnetic radiation. But there it is.

After twelve years, this is what I found. I had to find this myself last week on the Noa site, found it myself. So it's kind of a different world we're living in now where you can do your own research publicly, and you don't need to get that financing. You can do it on your own with crowdsource funding your own viewers and people who support you. That's the difference.

So I'm going to be uploading this video to YouTube, and I do want to point something out about this video. I tried to upload it to YouTube already, since it was sent to me directly by Thomas Bearden at the directive of their company after he passed away. That the information that was sent to me here. This video I tried to upload and YouTube automatically blocked it. First time in twelve years of uploading videos that I ever get this message saying that this video has already been uploaded before and removed.

Removed. They removed that video as violation of community service guidelines because they said there is no such thing as electromagnetic radiation modification of anything, let alone the weather, as he's saying in this video and many other things. And now that's it's. Again, it's a drop down choice from the NOAA weather modification site that has to be reported by private companies who are doing it currently. If they do it, private companies and the federal government does not have to report to Noa, so they're the ones running the radar.

So of course we're not going to see that or anything else like that. But there it is. So let's go upload this to YouTube. Everybody deserves to see it. And I would encourage you, if you didn't understand what he's talking about, maybe watch it a few times.

Actually, this is the second time, third time now I actually have watched it, but man, you probably are going to need to watch it multiple times to really get your head around some of the things he's talking about, like the projection of sicknesses and the projection of cures. And the French in the 1960s with their device to remove certain kinds of growths on your body, in your body. We know what that word starts with CN. You can't say it if you talk about a cure for it. So that's suppression for you, too.

And how the Soviets at the time and the former Soviet Union were far ahead of us in this. And he mentioned three other countries, but doesn't mention their names, says they're not exactly friendly to the United States, but they're not exactly enemies. And that would have been China, most likely the UK, and most likely Iran. Just saying there's a reason we haven't invaded Iran. And the directed energy weapons do mean everything from lasers to high power microwaves, which we call HPM.

The Directed Energy Warfare office. That the US. Navy has the dew d wo they have a directed energy warfare office. The Department of Defense came out and confirmed a video I put out, and they responded to a video I put out. I asked my viewers to send the video to the Department of Defense, and that was a few years ago, a couple of years back, when I captured live on weather satellite in ultraviolet, infrared coming out of space, beaming down to California into the fires and causing the fires.

And I got that live just by chance when we were looking at the weather, and I recorded it live and told my viewers to send it to the Department of Defense. A few days later, the Department of Defense responded with a public press conference announcing that our enemies, China and Russia, have satellites, killer satellites in spaces, they said. And I've got this video on my channel. You can go watch it. Department of Defense confirms Dew directed energy weapon.

And they said it can fire at a distance and killer satellites in space. And that was the response to my video four days earlier, five days earlier, where I literally captured it coming down from space, causing fires at a distance in California. Then they shot it down, apparently, which is another separate story entirely of how they took it down, how they took down the enemy satellite, or maybe it was a friendly satellite that was doing it to us. No way to know whose satellite it was. Maybe they do.

But whatever it was, it was up in space and it was beaming down and causing fires in California. We caught that live, and they responded unequivocally, explaining how our enemies have these in space and if they've got them, we've got them. Everybody's got them. Most likely all the big superpowers most likely have them. Even some private companies probably have them at this point, but that's another story to talk about, too.

This video is done are uploading to YouTube now.