Narradigm Investigations Ecology - 08-12-2022
Episode Summary:
On 12 August 2022, the document discusses the ecological threats posed by central banks, particularly the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its associated entities. These organizations are likened to a controlling octopus that influences global governance structures, including the United Nations. The central banks, the Rothschilds, and the WEF are seen as interconnected entities. The central issue is the degrading purchasing power of the dollar since its inception in 1913. Over time, the dollar's purchasing power has diminished, leading to economic challenges and shifts in consumer behavior. This has resulted in the rise of planned obsolescence, where products are designed to have a shorter lifespan. This trend has led to a shift from durable materials like glass to plastics, which has ecological implications. The push for green energy, such as windmills and solar panels, is criticized for not being energy efficient in the long run. The document also challenges the prevailing narrative about global warming, suggesting that the world is heading towards an ice age. The WEF and other global entities are criticized for pushing a narrative that doesn't align with this perspective.
Narradigm Investigations Ecology - 08-12-2022
Sounds working. Okay, so today is the 12 August 2022.
We're going to talk about ecology and the greatest threat to the planet Earth and all of humanity, which of course we all know. The ending of the story is the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) and their associated giant octopus that controls all of the governance structures on the planet, United Nations, all of this stuff. The central banks, I'm not going to get into the details of who they're related and how they're related.
The mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) and the Rothschilds and the central banks are essentially all the same thing, just looking at different groups within their overall structure with different names. So the World Economic Forum is a convenient focal point for discussion about the octopus that controls the planet because we have Dr. Evil there. So if you don't know Dr. Evil go google or search for "Dr. Evil Claus Schwab" that phrase, it'll bring up that image. Okay, so this is a discussion about the central banks and why they are the greatest threat or the World Economic Forum. Whatever face of the central bank structure is the greatest threat to the ecology of our planet. And that has to do with the degrading purchasing power of the dollar.
So they start out 1913 and they create their dollar. And one dollars actually has a purchasing power of approximately $99 because there's interest attached as soon as you've got it. Now, the interest on this flows through into the government, but they're actually taking that from you, the people. So you get one dollars and you end up with $99 worth of purchasing power. Now, you don't actually see this connection, right, because of the way that the scheme works, where they loan the money to the government, the government hands it to you, the government assumes the debt, but they indebt you to pay it off.
So you're the cattle. You're the cattle.
And so what occurs is a disconnect in the mind of the user relative to the currency and the shrinkage of it through this artificial tax called inflation. And they've always had that tax and usually it would run about 10%. So they were taking a dime out of every dollar and purchasing value from you, and you just didn't notice because you were always dealing with the same species. So you'd always get a dollar. And it wasn't like you would get a portion of a dollar and then a smaller portion so that you would notice.
Or it wasn't like you would see that they were changing the numbers up here. So that this is now a million dollars, because it now takes a million dollars to buy a Starbucks, right? Something like that, Zimbabwe style, which we're all coming to. That's why all of this shit is happening now. So now we're in 2022 and we've come to the situation where our dollar being issued to us.
So you come on out, you get one dollars and you have less than $0.01. So something less than one cent of purchasing value that you can use. And if you go back and look at what you could buy in 1913 for a dollar federal Reserve Note as opposed to today, you will be absolutely shocked. So in 1913, you may be able to eat very, very, very well for two, three days on a dollar if you were judicious. Right?
And this was a period of time up until 1933, this was a coexistence between the Federal Reserve Note the actual gold and silver dollars that were issued by the government. And so there was a coexistence of those two. They take away our ability to use gold, and then over the 1950s, they take away our ability to use silver by extracting it from the money. Surreptitiously. They told us they were going to do it, but they did it really slow, so nobody noticed.
Okay, so that's the setup. Now we note some really interesting things that between 1933 and 1958, all kinds of weird shit happens. Not only the space aliens, and not only the sudden rush at the 1956 57 and 58 to get down to Antarctica and get something, whatever the fuck was going on down there. Not only those kind of weirdnesses, but a more subtle weirdness came into existence. So from 1933 to 1958, we come up with this idea of planned obsolescence.
Planned obsolescence, the idea that you make products cheaper today than you did yesterday, and that they have less lifespan tomorrow than the ones that you produced the day before. So that you're always making cheaper goods. Up until we get to this point here in our story, it was denigrated and it was reduced. But between 1913 and 1933, for that 20 year period of time, we had still had a cultural focus on craftsmanship, substantiability, long lasting. So a tire you bought in 1933 for a vehicle was better than that same tire for the same weight of vehicle produced in 1913.
The tire in 1933 had more engineering into it, more science involved. It had a longer lifespan. This was a case of all kinds of goods. So early construction of any kind of consumer device was much more crude and much more unstable and much more needing of extra effort in the 1913 than 1933 because we still had a slop over of actual value that we could put towards greater engineering, greater science and so on. That is not this immediate return.
Okay? So that's the issue. So the central banks, so this is all done by the Federal Reserve Bank, right?
The evil fed here, engineers in this interest scam into the money, and it has these consequences. The consequences include planned obsolescence. And we note that when planned obsolescence came out in the 50s, really emerged as a driving business model. In the driving corporate business model, we get the shift from glass to plastic why is that? Because plastic is cheaper.
It breaks down and it's lighter weight when you have less purchasing power. And so, say by the 1950s we were at maybe we were at every dollar you could actually buy something with, right? So we'd lost like 40% of the value and the money by that time. So getting into plastic, it costs less to ship and handle plastic. One of the things you'll note is that over time, if you were to go and track it, the purchasing power of the dollar relative to energy, relative to not electricity, but relative to energy in the form of oil or electricity off of Hygo power, you could use that as well.
But energy off of oil, as the purchasing value of the dollar decreases and thus the nominal dollar amount needed for a barrel of oil rises, we get into this point where they're doing anything and everything they can. The central bank, I mean, to incentivize through our government planned obsolescence and a conversion towards more inexpensive and less long lasting items because of the energy involved. And you can't fiddle with energy. So when the purchasing value of the dollar drops, you have to use a lot more of them for this one commodity above all others. And that's energy.
Let me note that the most famous person for energy in all of humanity is Nikola Tesla. And they tried to replace him with Einstein. They tried to denigrate Tesla. Tesla wrote a little book, it's a great little book called something along the lines of "The Effort to Get More Energy for Humanity", something like that. So it can't be more than 80 pages.
Really cool thinking. Anyway. But they tried to replace him with Einstein, who was a plagiarist and a doofus and a fuzzy headed thinker, and they tried to replace the ether with quantum mechanics. In the in the 1920s we had a bunch of economic crises that caused the Bolshevik Revolution, caused the corruption of the German state as a result of the Weimar hyperinflation, and so on and so on, right? So all of these crises were occurring because we'd lost that 1st $0.20 or so in the purchasing value.
And it was becoming noticeable because prior to the dollar or the value of a purchase of energy stayed stable. Then we started getting into the oil and its purchasing price starts really jumping. And you can check me on this. I think maybe it went from like ten cents a gallon to rise very rapidly up to like 25 or thirty cents a gallon for crude oil. And that's the ultimate measure is like West Texas crude or something like this, right?
A steady, stable supply that you can track over time. If you track it, you find that energy costs while they fluctuate. They're really on this gradual rise relative to the failure of the dollar. And now we're at this peak. So we're now at the peak of everything.
The peak of bullshit, the peak of political chaos, the peak of inflation, the peak of hyperinflation, the peak of our current civilization based on this fiction. The debt, the dollar, right, the Fern, the Federal Reserve note. So this peak of stuff occurs as we are at the peak of no purchasing power left. So it's the absolute bottom of the Federal Reserve note in terms of purchasing power and in terms of how many of them are on the planet, it's the peak. We've got so many trillions of dollars printed and promised that we don't know how many we've got.
So right now we're getting into a discussion about the ecology of the Central Bank and how they've incentivized things like converting all products from glass to plastic. Well, this has a terrible side effect on everything. It's polluted all of our landfills with plastic that we're now going to have to go and recover once we get beyond the death of the Fern and get back to solid money. We'll do that. We'll start cleaning up things because it'll be easy to recycle the plastic into oils.
Okay? And then we're going to convert back to glass because glass has all these exceptional values. One of the things we're going to discover is that you can't ship effectively. It's not good to ship food products in plastic. That's why we've got microplastics in our gut and our lifespan is decreasing.
Well, that was good for the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants), but we don't want them. They're going to go away. So we need to make it good for humanity again and get back to more effective ways of dealing with things. But we can't do it now because we can't afford it. Now we're going to cross down to a threshold here on purchasing value very quickly now that we've reached this particular threshold or breakpoint.
Zimbabwe, Venezuela super hyperinflation is occurring now. It's just temporarily abated as they're doing everything they can for the midterms, these techno communists that are ruling everything for the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants), okay, without the technical communists, without the people that are technical, the mother Weffers have nothing. They can't do shit because they're so fucking stupid and they have no real power. They don't own anything, they don't produce anything anyway.
So part of the planned obsolescence includes, as I was pointing out, energy is the key, is this shift over to green energy. A lot of it is we can't afford to pay for real energy extraction. We can because all we have to do is get back to sound money and throw away the debt instruments and get rid of the weapons in the Central Bank and we're good. We start over and we're roaring right. And we will have learned our lesson this time anyway, though.
So we now have these mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) out there insisting that everybody go green with these giant fucking devices, these super huge windmills. Now let me note that those windmills will never, ever, ever generate enough energy to pay for the energy it took to create them. The energy that it took to create them was 100% diesel driven. It was diesel trucks, it was steel mills, it was mining through diesel equipment, and so on and so on. It's called zero net sum accounting, okay?
And if you go through and you start at the very beginning and you add up all the energy costs of creating these giant fucking windmills, and then you look at how much energy they actually produce, you find that it's a loss right from the get go. We never should have made any of the fuckers. Wind is just too unreliable and it never generates. And these things are too unreliable, they're too unstable. Especially when you scale them up this way.
And then we start looking at the cost of destroying the windmills and we can't recycle them. That's the whole thing. When they go bad, they burn the fuck up. They put lithium out all over in the environment, they pollute the area they're in, they kill birds, and they don't generate energy. So ant may use vast quantities of energy just getting the fucker set up, not even their creation.
But just it is true that there are categories of windmills that have been placed that will never generate enough electricity to pay back the cost of placing them there, let alone building the fucker, right? So the placement of a giant windmill offshore takes so much energy in the form of hauling the thing, boats, stability, the building of the base, all of that, the windmill will never, ever last long enough to generate the energy that it took to put it there. This is also true of most photovoltaics, most of the solar panels, because those panels will never generate enough peak energy to pay for their own creation through their life cycle, because they use so much diesel to create them. They use so much diesel to extract the aluminum, all the oars, and all the metals and stuff in them and so on, that they'll never, ever, ever make back as much energy as it took to create the fuckers. And we can't get rid of them.
We can't do anything with them. In California, landfills right now are filling up with these things like mad, and they pollute the ground in a very dangerous way. To a certain extent, photovoltaic is as bad as nuclear waste. Worst in one way, because it's so spread out everywhere so that you can dump these things in almost any landfill. Whereas nuclear waste, you've got to have a permit to shove that stuff in a hole in the ground somewhere.
Anyway, you see that it is the incentivizing, okay? It was the reduction of the value of the purchasing power of the dollar that led the Central Bank to incentivize planned obsolescence through the governance control structures at the time, through 1933 through 1958. If you go and you look, you see the idea rises with management consultants, management design people. This was the flourishing of applying analysis to our corporate structures. And so we get people like Peter Drucker.
Now, none of these individuals that worked through that period of time were necessarily bad individuals, but there were only very few people like Lyndon Larouche who examined the concept of what we were doing and why, who understood that planned obsolescence only existed because of the Fern scam, because of the Federal Reserve debt note scam, and that was driving us this way. And here we are in 2022 at the ultimate end of it, when every fucking thing is crashing. And so our generations here are very lucky because we get to throw this thing out and start over and build clean from there on. And we can do it with some smarts because we now have the tools for analysis, the computers and all of this kind of stuff, right? And we're going to have a much larger, educated, awake population that will say, no, you get your central bank the fuck out of my country, that sort of thing, right?
Anyway, so this whole thing, though, the ecology of it all, is also why the Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, the mother Weffers (WEF Participants), the World Economic Forum, the UN, the global control matrix that is all over humanity is our greatest ecological threat. And it's a very immediate ecological threat because these fuckers think that the world's heating up, that we're going into climate change. Well, climate is change. We have weather day to day to day and it changes. And when we lump it all together, we call that climate.
Dumb motherfuckers. Dumb mother Weffer's (WEF Participants). They're trying to trick you, right? They're trying to say this is XYZ. And it's not.
That there is no rising global temperatures. In fact, we're going into a fucking ice age. We know this. The rivers are drying up, we're getting the lakes drying up. We're getting the rivers drying up in Europe, and Lake Meat is drying up because of lack of rainfall.
Well, why is that? Beyond the weather manipulation and all of that shit? Beyond all of that, there are general trends that go along with solar minimums in which we have increased Glaciation and glaciers formed by vast quantities of rain being over that area where it gets real cold and freezes. That means that rain is not over your usual area. Or that means in, like Europe, the rain that should be rain is coming down to snow and it's freezing up there and thus is not filling your rivers.
So there's this general trend that way, right? This is part of our climate, which is change. And we're going into an ice age. And the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) in charge of all of this shit are telling you that you're going into hot and balmy. No, it isn't happening.
And you cannot survive an ice age on windmills and photovoltaics. You need to have her key fucking diesel engines. Outputting as much as you can and digging deep for as much diesel as you can get. And this is part of the biosphere. This is what universe wants us to do, which we've gone into some of that in the past and we are going to have to go into a great deal as to how we actually fit in to the biosphere and how the mother whippers.
Have you been thinking about Malthus who is a limit to growth guy who was a pastor, not a scientist. He's a pastor. Vernonsky was not only a scientist, he was a historian of science and a real smart thinker. Malthus was manipulated by his circumstances. He's this English pastor fellow and he was promoted by the Wefers all the way through history because his growth limit model which is bogus.
It's absolutely non factual at any level but it's promoted as though it's a good working theory. It's being used by the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) to tell you guys, we've got overpopulation, we can't provide the food and we're destroying the earth and all this kind of stuff. All of that is horse shit, absolute delusional horseship that they're trying to get you to eat along with the bugs. These people are motherfucking evil all right. And they're motherfucking stupid.
They are peak stupidity for their own purposes as well. I mean they're just diluted. We'll go into that and probably in great detail at some point. Okay, so the rivers are drying up. The climate is in fact change.
It is weather changing. We're going into an ice age. Just the other day, on Monday, the Pacific Coastal Current changed. I watched it. It changed with some vigor.
Instead of a north to south flow, it's now south to north. And this is one of the signs that winter is approaching. Let's see, that would have been the 8th. So this is about 21 days earlier. Okay, so this is 21 days earlier than two years ago.
So the general trend is for the current to change earlier in August. And the issue is that when it changes, the current doesn't flow from north to south anymore. I'm talking about the water current out here. It flows from south to north. This cause this drag, so to speak, a reverse current of air across the top of it that heads north to south and brings all our weather in for the winter along the coast here which then feeds most of the continent.
And so we're going to have an early and sharp move into winter, quite certain. And it's probably going to be exceptionally wet. We have very few days of sun out here this summer anyway. So it's changed. The Pacific Current has changed and we're moving into winter again.
This winter is going to be really brutal and probably everybody except for the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) and those who are still listening to them is going to really get a little bit of a heads up that, oh, yeah, shit ain't right weather wise, and we're going to be experiencing a lot of different stuff and oh, maybe it's an ice age and not global heating, right? Global warming is what they used to call it. Yes. Their language changes in 1960. They said that sitting up here in Washington coast in the 1960s, they were telling us that it would be like California weather.
And I thought, Damn, that's cool, right? Not cool, that's warm. That's nice. We'll be able to grow oranges. We'll have lemons, avocado trees, this kind of stuff.
Now, it wouldn't be too good for California. It's all that warmth shifted up north along the beach because California at that point would be basically like the Baja Peninsula. It would all be 100% dried out. And Iguanas running around that kind of thing. Lizards and no humans could live there because it'd be just too fucking hot.
And so we haven't seen that. Also in 1960s, they told us that most of the low lying coasts around the whole planet would be underwater, and so we wouldn't have any waterfront property along on the ocean that would be safe and that big influxes of water would come up Louisiana and all these low lying places on the Southeast, and we'd have 100% altered coastline. Well, none of that shit's happened. Like I said, these mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) are stupid. We can go back and see what they said.
Anyway, let's see where we're at now. I got to get moving here. All right? So we're in this period of time when the peak of the loss of purchasing power is going to have its peak effect relative to our thinking about ecology. All right?
Now what the Woo people need to do is to understand that it's Vernadsky's biosphere that describes where we're really at and that also provides hints for what we need to be doing. And we need to be providing a whole lot more fucking energy to humanity because it's going to get really cold around here, and we've got to do things differently just to survive, to adapt. Rather not just to survive, because we will survive, and we are going to adapt and thrive here, and we're actually going to get rid of all these mother. Weifers all right, so in the last couple of things here, I've got to get moving. Pure sleep.
If you need to sleep, it'll also help you bulk up. It gives you the precursors that you need to have the maximum amount of human growth hormone in your body at night when you're sleep. And that's the only time the human growth hormone is usable. It manifests anyway. So just as a final note, obviously I'm aware of the raid on Trump.
This is one of these weeks where decades of shit happen, and this was a giant turning point for the normies. They're getting all whipped up. They're finally starting to understand some of this shit, and it's going to get a lot more intense at a news level because we're reaching the peaks of these battles with the mother Weffer's (WEF Participants) as they go down. Every single person that knows about the World Economic Forum and thinks of them as an evil organization is one more victory for the good guys, one more person removed as a supporter of the mother weppers and who's over on the side of the opposition, which is humanity. Right?
Anyway, so that's basically it for this. Okay, so we've started the constitutional crises with the raid on Marlago, and we're going to get a couple of more here, all of which are going to be good relative to forcing this thing to a peak situation at the right time. So timing is critical and it's all coming down in this last 90 days. I think we're now what? It may be 89 days, 88 days until the midterms.
And so the pressure needs to really be brought up. So you'll see a lot more stuff being exposed as we go forward with the end of the Fed, right? Because that's what's happening. So we have a situation here when people say it's the ultimate battle of good versus evil. It's a situation of humanity can survive or the World Economic Forum can survive the global planetary control structure, not both.
So it's up to you guys. You got to make your choice at this stage.
**3850 Character Summary:**
On 12 August 2022, the document discusses the ecological threats posed by central banks, particularly the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its associated entities. These organizations are likened to a controlling octopus that influences global governance structures, including the United Nations. The central banks, the Rothschilds, and the WEF are seen as interconnected entities. The central issue is the degrading purchasing power of the dollar since its inception in 1913. Over time, the dollar's purchasing power has diminished, leading to economic challenges and shifts in consumer behavior. This has resulted in the rise of planned obsolescence, where products are designed to have a shorter lifespan. This trend has led to a shift from durable materials like glass to plastics, which has ecological implications. The push for green energy, such as windmills and solar panels, is criticized for not being energy efficient in the long run. The document also challenges the prevailing narrative about global warming, suggesting that the world is heading towards an ice age. The WEF and other global entities are criticized for pushing a narrative that doesn't align with this perspective.
**875 Character Summary:**
The document critiques the World Economic Forum (WEF) and central banks for their role in ecological threats. The diminishing purchasing power of the dollar since 1913 has led to economic challenges and the rise of planned obsolescence. This has caused a shift from glass to plastics, impacting the environment. The push for green energy solutions like windmills is criticized for inefficiency. The narrative of global warming is challenged, suggesting an impending ice age.
**95 Character Summary:**
Critique of WEF and central banks' ecological impact; challenges global warming narrative.
**Space-separated 35 Hashtag Keywords:**
#Ecology #CentralBanks #WEF #Dollar #PurchasingPower #PlannedObsolescence #Glass #Plastic #GreenEnergy #Windmills #SolarPanels #GlobalWarming #IceAge #EconomicChallenges #Environment #Narrative #Critique #Inflation #Energy #Diesel #Biosphere #Malthus #Vernonsky #Governance #UnitedNations #Rothschilds #EconomicForum #Pollution #Recycle #ClimateChange #Weather #Rainfall #Rivers #Lakes
**Comma-separated 35 Keywords:**
Ecology, Central Banks, WEF, Dollar, Purchasing Power, Planned Obsolescence, Glass, Plastic, Green Energy, Windmills, Solar Panels, Global Warming, Ice Age, Economic Challenges, Environment, Narrative, Critique, Inflation, Energy, Diesel, Biosphere, Malthus, Vernonsky, Governance, United Nations, Rothschilds, Economic Forum, Pollution, Recycle, Climate Change, Weather, Rainfall, Rivers, Lakes, Biosphere
**Ten Blog Post Titles:**
1. The Hidden Ecological Threats of Central Banks 🌍
2. WEF and the Global Governance: An Ecological Perspective 🌿
3. The Dollar's Decline: From Glass to Plastic 📉
4. Green Energy: Are Windmills Really the Future? 💨
5. Challenging the Global Warming Narrative: Are We Heading for an Ice Age? ❄️
6. The 2022 Perspective on Planned Obsolescence and its Impact
7. From Craftsmanship to Obsolescence: A Century's Shift
8. The 3 Major Environmental Missteps of the 21st Century 🌳
9. Decoding the Real Cost of Green Energy Solutions
10. The Role of Diesel in a World Pushing for Green 🛢️
**Key Takeaways:**
- Central banks, especially the World Economic Forum (WEF), are seen as major ecological threats.
- The purchasing power of the dollar has been degrading since 1913, leading to economic challenges.
- The rise of planned obsolescence has shifted consumer products from durable materials like glass to plastics.
- Green energy solutions, such as windmills, are criticized for their inefficiency and long-term ecological impact.
- The prevailing narrative of global warming is challenged, suggesting the world might be heading towards an ice age.
**Predictions from the PDF:**
- The world is heading towards an ice age, contrary to the prevailing global warming narrative.
- The purchasing power of the dollar will continue to degrade, leading to further economic challenges.
- The push for green energy solutions will not be sustainable in the long run due to their inefficiency.
https://chat.openai.com/share/87d25e0b-b5b9-48cb-bd11-dcec3a81745e