Episode Summary:

The document discusses the complexity of our current world, emphasizing the interconnectedness of various systems. It challenges the notion of simplicity as a guiding principle, arguing that complexity is inherent in the universe. The author critiques physicist Brian Keating's rationalist approach, linking it to the liberal education movement that emerged post-Kali Yuga. The text suggests that liberalism and new inventions stem from this period.

It further delves into the ontological model of the universe, which is described as inherently complex. The author contrasts this with the simpler grid model and criticizes the latter for not accounting for the full complexity of the universe. The discussion touches on the role of science in investigating ontological models and the limitations faced by those who adhere to simpler frameworks.

The narrative shifts to address contemporary issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, attributing it to an Elohim worship cult's depopulation agenda. This conspiracy theory implicates Jewish individuals in big pharma and government, predicting a backlash against them. The text anticipates severe social repercussions, including violence against rabbis and the Jewish community.

The document predicts that humanity will face a period of choices and challenges as we move into the age of Aquarius. It suggests that the Elohim worship cult's influence will lead to significant societal upheaval, including potential violence and the downfall of Judaism. The author foresees a future where the Elohim's long lifespans and psychological manipulation have lasting impacts on humanity.

The narrative includes discussions on racial intelligence disparities, advocating for racial mixing to reduce overall intelligence in the population. It predicts a mass die-off and social chaos as people grapple with these revelations. The text envisions a future where humanity must rebuild economically and scientifically, with universities and colleges becoming obsolete due to funding issues and backlash against "Wokonianism."

The author advises navigating these changes carefully, predicting a dangerous period ahead. The text concludes with a call for Jewish individuals to confront their religious conundrum and heal from Stockholm syndrome. It warns of a global backlash against Judaism and anticipates a year of contention from July, leading to significant social and political changes.

#complexity #universe #ontologicalmodel #COVID19 #conspiracy #Elohim #depopulation #Jewishbacklash #ageofAquarius #racialintelligence #societalupheaval #economicrebuilding #scientificrebuilding #Stockholmsyndrome #globalbacklash #yearofcontention #BrianKeating #liberalism #newinventions #simplicity #KaliYuga #liberalarts #rationalism #ontologicalcomplexity #gridmodel #Elohimworship #Jewishcommunity #violence #downfallofJudaism #racialmixing #massdieoff #socialchaos #Wokonianism #universitiesobsolete #fundingissues

Key Takeaways:

The universe's complexity challenges simplistic models like the grid model.
The ontological model emphasizes inherent complexity in the universe.
The COVID-19 pandemic is attributed to an Elohim worship cult's depopulation agenda.
The text predicts severe social repercussions for the Jewish community.
Humanity faces a period of challenges as it transitions into the age of Aquarius.
Societal upheaval and the downfall of Judaism are anticipated.
The narrative discusses racial intelligence disparities and social chaos.
Economic and scientific rebuilding is necessary.
The author calls for Jewish individuals to confront their religious conundrum.
A global backlash and a year of contention starting in July are predicted.

Predictions:

Severe social repercussions for the Jewish community.
Societal upheaval and the downfall of Judaism.
Mass die-off and social chaos.
Economic and scientific rebuilding.
A global backlash against Judaism.
A year of contention starting in July.

Key Players:

Brian Keating, Physicist
Alex Jones
Naomi Wolf
Rabbis (no specific names given)
Elohim (contextual reference)
Alta Report (contextual reference)
Naomi (contextual reference, possibly Naomi Wolf)
Pharisees (contextual reference)
Gonz (contextual reference)

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Time Is Not Complicated It Is Complex - 05-14-2024

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. Hang on a second.

Stick around. Yeah, it's May 14. It's like ten something. No, leave that alone. Out here with the dog.

Taken some sun and wanted to discuss the complexity of where we're at.

We live in a world that is a system of systems. The systems themselves are quite complex. A lot of this complexity has always been there, and it's just been an issue of our view. We couldn't see it, right. We didn't understand we had a paradigm or a neurodigm, really, of simplicity being the order of the day.

Simplicity is inherent in the grit model of philosophy here, right, of the grit approach to universe that somehow, without life, without consciousness, existing, grit would exist even if there was no life or consciousness to see it. Okay. And this doesn't mean just humans. It means, like, any life, any consciousness. And so that's a.

That's a fallacy. We don't have that simplistic level of universe where grit just simply bumps into other grit and they stick together and become a more complex grit. It does not work that way. So we live in a complex universe, a complex materium. It's so complex, the material is inside a universe, and so on and so on.

Right? But the point being that you don't see the complexity unless you know that complexity exists. And to look for it and the model you choose can blind you to stuff. So what's his name? Brian Keating.

He's got a. He's a physicist. Came that close to winning a Nobel prize, which is like, yeah, that's fine, dude. You get some money from a dead dynamite producer anyway. But he's always saying, oh, no, you've got to start from, you know, the rationalist approach.

This came about as part of the liberal education stuff that was evolving in the 1690s as part of all of us coming out of Kali Yuga. So note that all of that shit started in 1699, and we were out of the Kali Yuga in 1698. All that stuff started in 1699. We were out of the Kali yuga, and liberalism, or liberal arts education, was born, right. And started coming up from there.

All different kinds of things that emerge, new inventions and so on. Anyway, so complexity exists inherently within the ontological model of universe. Hang on a second.

Okay, I'm out here struggling to see with against the sun if this thing is actually recording. Again, the second. Let's see here.

Okay, I think we're recording. Yeah. Okay. All right, so. So the grit model of physics is inherently the simple model, right?

Ontological is inherently complex ontological is so complex that many people can't wrap their heads around any aspect of it and can't see how you could use science to investigate an ontological model. It's that complex. So they don't. They prefer the grid only model. Like this Brian Keating fellow, he's podcaster in the physics realm.

He interviews some decent people, and he always comes right up to the edge of the space alien issue and then backs off because he's elohim worship cultist. Anyway, so our world is so complex that any aspect of it you examine, you can get into some serious complexity. We are right now struggling as humanity with our Elohim problem. This affects us in so many ways. So we have right now Alex Jones and Naomi Wolf attempting to shift the narrative, to try, basically, I think, to take the pressure off the Jews, right?

They're trying to shift the narrative on the COVID thing over to dis, or non corporeal disincarnate evil, right? So the devil, right? And then that's not going to wash, right? This was an instance of evil that has human hands all over it.

So we have to deal with that. We have to deal with the fact that even if you acknowledge except or a disincarnated evil, that disincarnated evil still needed human hands to do this terrible thing to humanity, it's not going to do it on its own. So human hands are involved. What's going to happen, though? What part of our complexity issue relative to religion and all this other shit is where we're going to be at in just a few short weeks, and in a few short weeks, we're going to have emerged into the developing consensus that the COVID thing was planned in synagogues, okay?

Which is going to cause some real issues. They're going to be people that will start compiling lists of all of the jewish people in big pharma. They'll compile lists of all of the jewish people that are in government that said things about COVID And it'll just come down basically to a vast quantity of jews that will have been named, have been discreetly isolated by the gathering of data relative to COVID. And it will show, as we, as we know, as the Wu people know, that this was a Elohim worship cult op, and as part of their depopulation thing, right? And that it's baked in the cake now, you know, if you're female and you took the shot, you're going to be infertile, right?

If you're male and you took the shot, you're going to be infertile. Any fertility that may struggle through and overcome the problems put in there by the Elohim worship cult shot will produce likely genetically inferior products, aka mutants and, you know, stillbirths and all kinds of deformities and this kind of thing. Right? What was that stuff? They had a bunch of births in the sixties of deformed kids as a result of chemicals that were given to women during pregnancy.

And that's thalidomide babies. There you go. And this could be much worse than that, actually, it'll be less worse than that because not so many people are going to survive this, to have fertility actually express itself in them after they've gotten the shot. So this could be hugely impacting on the social order.

Some of the old data sets back in the Alta report days are manifesting now. We're in the process of those things manifesting. This manifestation is showing up as the organization of the resurgence of reality, I guess you'd say, as we move into the age of Aquarius here. And the impact for humans, for all of us, guys, is that we're coming up to a period of choices, challenges and choices.

We have to deal with our own emotions after being assaulted by the Elohim worship cult. This is going to affect jews more than anyone else. Okay? We're all going to hate the Elohim worship cult. We're going to hate them fiercely for what they've done.

Rabbis will be. I don't know that they'll be shot on sight, but rabbis will be chased down the street, and they'll be beat by mobs. They'll be stripped. Many of them will be killed. Rabbis houses will be looted.

It's going to get that bad because rabbis will be isolated off into the Pharisees. As we come to this greater understanding of the complexity of what's been done to us by the Elohim worship cult. This does not require the Elohim to make a reappearance. It doesn't even require us to acknowledge what's going on on our moon. Right?

And I say our moon, just because it's attached to the earth. Temporarily, those will come out. We will see evidence of the activity on the moon being discussed, and we'll see evidence of the Elohim being discussed this summer. And they'll discuss the Elohim in a pretty factual way. You'll also have the bullshit artist Vatican and those people out there discussing it, too, and trying to obscure all of this stuff.

But everyone will start to recognize the Vatican is just an extension of the Elohim worship culture. And this is going to hit the big mega churches here in the United States very hard. It's going to hit the zionist christian community really hard. So there's going to be huge battles within the zionist christian community over the importance of our situation now relative to understanding the Elohim as corporeal beings and not some, another word for God. Okay?

And so in what they've done to us and how these beings created Judaism and so on, basically, it's going to come down to this over perhaps the next 50 years. I don't know how brief this will be, nor how violent. The more violent it is, the briefer it's going to be. But Judaism is going to have to die. We've got to deal with the Pharisees.

We've got to deal with. They're worshiping these space aliens and taking instructions and stuff from these space aliens. Here is our problem with the Elohim themselves. The Elohim themselves are mentally ill from their long lives. They're mentally ill from a sustained level of radiation within their force field bubbles.

It just keeps them in a steady hum. Right? This is not a natural way to exist. They used to, or their native natural biological lifespan may be as much as 3000 years, and they degrade, even in that 3000 years into a mental morass. In like the last third of their lives, they at some point came across the Gonz technology, these force fields, and within these forest fields, they can live perhaps 20 or 30,000 years.

But it does not eliminate the long live disease, it merely shunts it out further into their future. Right? The more time they spend out of the gans, the more time they are subjected to real time, so to speak. The more duration of real time they have, the less they live, as with all of us. And, you know, I mean, the less long their lifespan ahead of them is.

And in this case, that also brings forward these mental illnesses. These people are, these beings are addicts. They're terrible, violent guys. You just have to read the Bible to understand all of this. They want you to kill your kids, you know, cut their dicks off, all of this kind of stuff as sacrifices to their egos.

Anyway, so we're going to get into all of this stuff with the Elohim and the Elohim themselves because they are so long lived. They have a tendency, these guys are gamers, okay? They're addicted to gaming as well as all that are other addictions in their gaming. That just basically is how to manipulate organizations and structures. And so they love organizations and structures.

And so they've imposed organizations and structures onto tribal humanity. And thus we have civilization. And civilization itself is under attack at the moment because they're attempting to. The Elohim are attempting to drastically reduce the size of the herd, meaning all of humanity, such that they can have a tighter level of control with a reduced humanity that is less smart. They want people to be very, very dumb.

This is why they want racial inbreeding. Okay, it is factual that the average or the mean, the halfway mark on, on white people is 100 IQ points, right? Whether or not you believe the IQ tests or not, it's immaterial to this particular metric. So white people have 100 as the mean. Half or below that half or above it.

Black people, that's 72. Okay, so half of the of black people are below 72 in IQ and half are above. It gets even worse if you look at exceptionalism within IQ, because within whites, exceptionalism crosses the boundary at about 125 and we've got a significant 25%. One quarter of white people will be born with exceptional potential for cogitation in the sense that their IQ points will be over 125. Black people, only 5% are going to be born over 100 and only 1% are going to be born over 125.

So it's disproportionate. This is just the way that genetics work out. So this is in the favor of the Elohim to get as many white women bred by black men as they possibly can in order to lower the overall general intelligence in the population. People are going to hate on me for saying that, but that's just the way it is. This is reality.

If you can't face reality, basically go find one that you can face, or however, deal with it any way you may. Mostly those people that can't, in my opinion, those people that can't face reality won't make it through the rest of this year. We'll have a mass die off, we'll have all kinds of suicides, we'll have all kinds of deaths due to accidents that are really suicides in disguise, and so on and so on. As a result of the having to come to grips with all of this shit, as a result of us crossing into the age of Aquarius or in to this 326th year of the Duapar yuga, which is the Bronze Age, right? So we're getting smarter as we go along.

Anyway, we now have to face this reality and deal with it.

It's going to be rough on all of us. We'll come through. Humanity will get over it. Everything will be better as we go forward, but we're going to be entering into Sci-Fi world, so we're not going back. Okay?

Don't expect that we will return to anything that existed in your youth, because that shit that existed in your youth was a delusion that had been placed on your mind such that you would view reality a certain way. That delusion was engineered by the Elohim and put in the hands of the Elohim worship cult such that it could be distributed across the planet. That's the way they work. The Elohim worship cult, though, appears to have lost contact with the Elohim because they're making really dumb moves now, doing really stupid things. Okay?

And so as a result, errors are compounding on their side, and the Elohim worship cult is floundering. And we didn't all take the shot. There's more than enough of us left to go and take care of the Elohim worship cult. We're in the process of this. They'll be incarcerated or executed as is required, and it's going to be a very energetic twelve or 15 years getting into that aspect of this.

You needn't dwell on that aspect of this. It'll take a long time for all of that stuff to sort out at a socio political level, but you could go and involve yourself with the economic stuff that we have to rebuild, or the science stuff we have to rebuild, etcetera. You can figure universities and colleges are dead. There's a lot of reasons for this. We can go into them if anybody really gives a shit, but funding is going to destroy them, as is the backlash to Wokonianism.

So that being the case, you need to navigate this as best you can. It's going to be very dangerous. I have been saying for a long time, and no one's picked up on this, and the time is getting far too short for me to keep on saying, saying this. And I had thought that maybe Naomi would, with my interview with her, would allow us to get into this, and it would provide the opportunity for jewish people to understand that there is a way out of their conundrum. And it's staring them right in the face.

They don't want to see it. And the fact that they've been inculcated by their religion, their Stockholm syndrome, to not be able to see it, even when it's pointed out to them, is a real problem. So in other words, the Elohim are so sophisticated, they're so long lived. There's such good psychologists psychiatry is bullshit, but they're such good psychologists that they can put mental blocks in at a cultural level that will persist for thousands of years. Okay?

These. You. You've lived with one of these mental blocks, which was anti semitism, which is now falling away. All these mental blocks are falling away. As we get into the.

Further into these energies from galactic center, we're able to, quote, see more, right? Our vision is increasing. All of these various different allusions to the fact that we're getting more energies and our brains are operating at a higher degree of engagement. So all of this is occurring, and we're running into and discovering all of these things that the Elohim have put into humanity by way of the Elohim worship cult and the complexity of what they've done there. Truly staggering, because they've actually blinded the members of the cult to being able to see the cult that they're within.

And they will die rather than see that. And they will die rather than allow others to see that. The clues are all over. The clues are actually written in plain sight in the Talmud and many of the different books, and they're even written in the Zohar. Okay?

So they lay all this stuff out in the Zohar, and it's labeled as mysticism. It's a jewish mystic book that's claimed to have been written over the course of centuries by a lot of people, but it was written by this one really whacked out son of a bitch in a relatively short period of time, back in the 16 hundreds, as we're all coming out of the Kali yuga. Right? So, anyway, the complexity upon or complication upon complication upon complication is adding to the. The problems of the jew community getting their heads wrapped around the fact that they are indeed victims.

They're not victims from other humans, they're victims from their, quote, gods. And they need to really examine that. And in order to save themselves from what is coming from this giant global backlash, they must, in my opinion, they must heal themselves from the Stockholm syndrome that is Judaism. And they've got to really examine how Judaism, how their religion has been taken over by the Pharisees, by the rabbinical councils, who are all saint nests and are off on this other pathway. These are the blood lickers.

These are some severely demented minds, captured minds. Anyway, so it's going to be a fun year of contention. Right? So. So we're going to see how people react when they've got to contend with all of this internally and externally.

And it's there we're actually getting into a year of contention, but it's not like from January it's going to be from July. And so like from summer to summer, we're going to go through a twelve month period of time where the focus is going to be on contention and fighting potentially war. But contention is bigger than that. And during this period of time, the Elohim are going to come on out. That's going to shock the zionist Christians to really examining their relationship with Jews.

It's going to bust up the rabbinical mafia that controls Judaism because the zionist Christians are going to start looking at rabbis as pretty disgusting, foul non human beings.

And from there it's going to get worse. So, you know, so whatever kind of chaos we go into in the summer, you're going to be living through it for the next twelve months, probably even longer in many different places. But in the intensity for the next twelve months, it's the year of contention from that point on, right? July to July for all of us guys here in the USA. And remember when we started off this year, I said the goal was to survive through 25, right?

So 24 and 25 are going to be pretty harsh years for the planet and for humanity. After we get through 25, it will ease up considerably and things will take a more positive tone.

Anyway, guys, I got to get in, get some coffee and get some more work done.

Previous Blog Posts:

View me!

Justice vs Law – 04-11-2024

Justice vs Law - 04-11-2024

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The text discusses various contemporary social issues, touching on the dichotomy between law and justice, and exploring societal reactions to perceived injustices. It highlights incidents that are seen as manifestations of 'street justice', where people take the law into their own hands, reflecting a deep mistrust in the formal legal system to deliver justice. The author provides a somewhat apocalyptic vision of future societal breakdowns, predicting major conflicts and upheaval in several countries, attributing these to a clash between natives and migrants, which he describes in stark, often racial, terms.

The predictions include violent street battles reminiscent of historical conflicts, suggesting a cycle of violence returning. He claims that these events will radically transform social order and significantly impact younger generations. The narrative is interspersed with personal anecdotes and observations, enhancing the prophetic tone while discussing a variety of global issues including governance, migration, and societal violence.

#Justice #Law #Society #Conflict #Violence #Migration #Predictions #SocialOrder #StreetJustice #LegalSystem #Europe #USA #RacialTensions #Migrants #Natives #FutureGenerations #GlobalUnrest #CulturalClashes #StreetBattles #HistoricalCycles #YouthImpact #PropheticWarnings #Apocalyptic #Governance #Anarchy #MilitaryIntervention #Lawlessness #CivilUnrest #Survival #SelfDefense #CommunityResponse #Emergency #RadicalChange #Security #Transformation

Key Takeaways:

Society faces potential violent upheavals due to unresolved tensions between natives and migrants.
Street justice may increase as trust in the legal system wanes.
The predicted conflicts could radically alter social orders and impact younger generations significantly.
Racial and cultural tensions are central themes in the predicted scenarios.
The author suggests that law and justice are not synonymous, with true justice often not achieved through formal legal systems.
Predictions include severe and widespread societal and racial conflicts across Europe and the USA.
Military interventions may play a critical role in controlling or exacerbating these conflicts.
The narrative warns of a dystopian future where vigilante justice becomes more commonplace due to failures in the justice system.
Concerns are raised about the impact of these events on the psychological health of future generations, especially children.
The discourse is heavily imbued with a sense of impending drastic change, urging preparedness for extreme scenarios.

Predictions:

Violent clashes between natives and migrants in various countries, especially in Europe and the USA.
Major societal and cultural upheavals globally, with a radical transformation of the social order.
Significant transformations in social structures impacting future generations, with potential long-term psychological effects.
Increased instances of street justice and vigilante actions as public trust in formal legal systems deteriorates.
Potential military interventions to control rising violence and lawlessness within nations.
Predictions of severe racial and cultural conflicts, possibly leading to large-scale violence and even massacres.
Forecast of societal breakdowns that may lead to periods of intense street battles reminiscent of historical conflicts.
The emergence of lawless zones where formal governance may fail and be replaced by local forms of justice.
Anticipation of severe economic disruptions, including potential market crashes and financial instability.
Warnings of upcoming catastrophic events, described as being so severe they could be remembered as marking a significant historical period.
Predictions of extreme political measures, such as the banning of dual citizenships or ownership restrictions based on nationality.
Forecasts of a major shift in geopolitical power structures and alliances, with specific countries facing internal and external pressures.
Predictions of assassinations or executions of high-profile individuals linked to global controversies and conspiracies.

Key Players:

President Donald Trump (mentioned as Trump as CIC, which stands for Commander in Chief)
Bill Gates
Klaus Schwab
Justin Trudeau (mentioned simply as Trudeau)
Elohim Worship Cult
SOC (Self-Organizing Collective)
Israeli Rabbinical Council
Joe (in reference to "Joe's dream")
Whoopi Goldberg

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Justice vs Law - 04-11-2024

Hello humans. Hello humans. We're in the sand car here. It's like a little after eight, like 815 or something on Thursday the 11 April.

Got some good coffee and we're heading down to do a bit of shopping and paying some contractor people. I say we because it's the dog and I, so we may get some little bit of disruption here, barking wise.

Very cold. We usually have cold aprils here on the beach anyway, but you know, we're getting into 34 on the beach at night, so pretty cold.

Alright? So I'm having to move tons of computer equipment and do all kinds of stuff like that. Got all kinds of physical labor kind of stuff I've got to get done. And that's really cut into my schedule for other activities.

I have a few more appointments in these in this coming month inland, some distance away from the coast. So I'll be able to make some more audios, but they're going to be a little irregular because the schedule is not under my control. So we'll, we'll see. Hang on a second. There we go.

Anyway, I wanted to talk about victims. Okay, so we're coming into. All right, so let me back up. There is a law and then there's justice. And the two are not the same, okay?

And in my way of thinking, you can, if you work very diligently, achieve justice out of law, okay? But it's not guaranteed and it's not usual. In the normal course of events, justice occurring out of law is at an emotional level, weaker, okay? At an emotional level on the individuals involved, but also the general population. Justice that emerges out of law is weaker than justice that emerges out of populace.

And so we see this the other day with, there's a video being circulated now. It's on bitchute and it shows a guy in New York City, a black man, bashing an asian woman in the head. And this black man immediately gets set upon by three or four guys. And then it turns out to be about maybe ten or twelve. Over the course of events, everybody takes a shot at him.

They knock him down and eventually knock him out. And everybody comes along and kicks him or punches him or whatever, right? And so that is street justice. He committed a crime. It offended the social body around him.

The toxic males, the protectors of the social order, took action and it was done. It was over. Now, would he ever have been prosecuted? Probably not. And so law would have yielded no justice whatsoever.

This was instant street justice, instant vigilante justice, that kind of thing. Now imagine this same situation of this for whatever motivation, this black man runs on up and bashes an asian woman in the head in a state where there is licensed concealed carry or open carry, and the justice level will be swift, there won't be a need for bashing people. And you'll have to call for a John Wick style dinner reservation. Right? You'll have to call someone to come and clean up the mess, take the body away.

That is coming. I think we're within 40 days or so of that, right? Really? It's about 36 according to the data sets I'm looking at now. But of course, timing on those is questionable at best.

But in any event, it is coming. We're seeing this generalized trend of increasing social justice and reaction this way. And so it was assault when he hit her, when that guy just came on up and bashed her in the head, that was assault. So a crime indeed was committed, but there was no formality or anything. But now we have justice meted out, and the guy essentially very much paid for his crime.

And so look at England. All right, so in England, one of the videos coming out now is of mobs of migrants, okay? Invaders. Mobs of them that are throwing shit at the police. And the police are just not really reacting.

They're just sort of taking a defensive posture near a building and basically taking it all. And so this is a country on the very verge of lawlessness. And so maybe it will be the case of it will start in England and not Sweden. Our data sets had said that the actual war between the natives and the invaders would begin in Sweden. But, you know, maybe technically we can say it's already happened because the Swedes have had to move the military in to quell the gang violence in some of the ghettos, where the invaders from Ethiopia and Somalia had taken over the territory, displaced all of the native population, and are living in a closed ghetto situation where there were gang wars going on and the military had to come involved and be involved.

That technically could be the start of this in Sweden, but in any event. So it'll get to England, it'll get to Ireland. We will see street battles, okay? Like 1870s in New York used to have street battles between the Irish and the Italians and blacks. And they would be big mobs, you know, several hundreds of.

Of people out there fighting several hundreds of men on each side with various kinds of weapons used to go on out in these battles in the east coast cities, a lot of them in New York. And we'll see that again. This time we'll be seeing it coming out of Ireland and England and the street battles in England, I don't know how they're going to go. Right? But in Ireland, it looks like the Irish are going to be fierce enough that there will be a great slaughter of brown and black skinned people in Ireland.

Like, a great slaughter. They're going to kill them and just leave them in the street. In fact, it's going to get even worse than that, because some of my data sets suggest that we're going to have, like, these warning signs. Okay, so in the past, when there was vast quantities of chaos and stuff in Europe and you were attacked, the village would repel the attack. They would kill a bunch of the invaders, and then after it was all done, they would go on out and they'd hang the invaders from trees.

The dead invaders hung from trees by their feet and just left there to hang as a warning to others. We're going to see that again. Okay, so we're going to see areas that will be decorated with dead brown and black people. In Europe, it's going to get really ugly, and that ugliness is coming here to the United States, and we will have many, many, many months of this. All right?

So maybe we will have maybe. Okay, so there's different. You can categorize it in different phases, but maybe our upcoming period is going to last three years of street violence. Okay? But there will be a period of, like, seven or eight months of it that will be like Saigon in the last days.

So it's going to be seriously disturbing to people and very seriously disrupting. There's a real possibility we won't go that route, but that's going to depend on our socket and our self organizing collective that's back there behind all of the Q stuff that supports Trump as CIC, all of this kind of stuff, right? Our continuity in government. So now that could kick in, and if we have a large enough core of loyal military, it could shorten this period of chaos and maybe even eliminate it. If the military gets out there and starts rounding up people in a mass deportation effort and goes through all of that kind of chaos and histrionics, then that will short circuit the need, basically, the need for the populace to do it itself.

So it's indeterminate at this stage as to which route it would go. But the amount of release language and building tension, language associated with dealing with the migrants will escalate and to cover, and it covers either condition. So that escalation of violence could be the government being violent, or it could be the populace. It'll be against the invaders. It's going to get, like I say, very ugly.

We will see a radically transformed social order over the next ten years, and it'll be radically transformed at the core, key levels in generations. So the generation z, I guess they call them, right? That generation and the one that follows it are going to be severely impacted, altered, changed by what they're going to go through over these next five years. Right? It changes you to see people did when you're five years old, to see battles in the streets and that kind of thing.

So we're all Gaza now. We're all Gazans now. And the Elohim, the israeli rabbinical council in Tel Aviv has ordered the immigrants, the invaders, to attack us and seize our country. And so we're going to fight back. Now, the good news for me is that the data sets show that a lot of the people that are responding to this attack, the SAHK especially, are going to be very pragmatic and deliberate and will deliberately target the Elohim worship cult.

They'll deliberately target rabbis. So the rabbinical councils everywhere in the USA right now are under military intelligence observation. Many of them, not the councils, but many of the synagogues and stuff have been infiltrated and are being intensely watched. Okay? So this is not news to them.

They know this is going on. You just don't know it. But it's going to get that. It's going to get that deep, right? So there will be rabbis, you know, pedophiles, enforcers for the Elohim worship cult, whatever you want to call them.

These organized criminals will flee the United States as this shit erupts. Now, my data sets from way back when, like 2006 and 2007, were pointing out that we would have periods of time where whole jewish enclaves were under attack. And it's difficult to sort out the data. You get all different kinds of confusing stuff, and it's only in hindsight that you can say, oh, look, you know, it went this way, not that way. But the language described both in sort of a, you know, it covered both of these developing situations, and it could have gone either way.

And so in this case, we will have a tax, but it could be that we're. We're not having mobs of invaders triggered by the palestinian genocide that the Israelis are carrying out, but rather could be military rounding up criminals within these jewish enclaves. Right? And so we can't tell from the data sets. All it says is, you know, that there's going to be people going and attacking housing subdivisions and areas where there are ensconced, or we might even think of as, like, armored jewish organizations.

And it'll be the organization that will be the target and that it will cause the disruption of these jewish enclaves. So it could be that we're going to have mobs of people out there running around deliberately attacking jewish housing complexes and subdivisions and stuff in more jewish areas in the east coast, or it could be that there are going to be targeted hits in the rounding up and the exportation, you know, the expulsion of these criminal rabbis. If they get rounded up by the military, I don't know that they're going to be expelled. Right? So a lot of them are going to go to jail.

And that's why I think once that starts, a lot will. Many of them will flee rather than hang around and wait to be arrested.

Could be quite chaotic. And this will last all through this year, the rest of this year, and into 2025.

The level of disruption at this stage, anything we say is going to have a tendency to minimize it. Okay? There's going to be quite disrupting at all different kinds of levels. So we'll see some of these people. All right?

So because of who is being targeted and the structure of our social order in this, because of the Elohim worship cult and its control over businesses and stuff through the jewish community, we're going to see a large amount of business disruption. So people will flee to Israel who own businesses in the United States. And then we'll have non jewish senators and representatives who will put forth laws, bills in which will say, oh, you can't be a dual citizen, and you can't be a dual citizen of the United States with Israel. But even beyond that, we'll have things saying, no Israeli can own a business that operates in the United States. And so Israelis will have to have, like, special permission for their business to do business with us.

It's going to get that weird that I expect maybe 2026, 2027, as things really come out, as to what's been happening. So it's going to take us a couple of years to get out and really name names. But we're getting into it now as we get into Falkey and some of these other people being arrested and prosecuted. Holy shit.

Almost killed him.

He was trying to pass. He was a motorcycle going, like, fast anyway, but he was trying to pass a line of about nine cars anyway. So we're getting into this period here where it's going to pop off. And so I'm thinking it's within. We're within 38 days of the pop off point.

Sometime in these next 38 days, which brings us up to about mid May, we're going to have an incident that will spark other incidents, and then we're off and running. It's going to be really weird. It's not going to be like everybody's going to pull guns out and start shooting on the same day. But once the shooting starts, it's not going to stop for a number of years, intermittently. It'll be taking the news.

Right. And of course, you're, you know, Whoopi Goldberg is good at just shit herself with the, you know, number of incidents going down and the way in which it goes down. So you're going to see a huge reaction to all of these events within the dying mainstream media for these next few months that will, of course, you just have to, you know, it's got to be the opposite of whatever they're saying, and you're covered. Right. You understand it?

Look, they're sasquatches. Yes.

So, like I say, gonna be fairly interesting that way.

I've got a lot of data sets here, a lot more data than usual because of an arrangement I had made with some people that are outside our country and outside of the purview of the Elohim worship cult and their effect on things. Anyway, so the data sets are suggesting that July 15 or 16th, it's going to be a UFO episode. More language than you personally experiencing a UFO. You'll experience it vicariously through someone else videoing it, and then all the language and discussion, discussion about it. 15th or 16, July.

Whatever occurs on that date, though, is indicated within the data sets to be a temporal marker, a precursor, indicating that we're going to have these. The riots that have long been forecast, and they'll be showing up in August. Now, these may be fake riots engendered by the Democrats. I just don't know. They're saying the data sets are still describing it as a food riot kind of a situation.

Desperate need desperate people, that kind of thing that then liberates, accidentally liberates documents and understandings about UFO's. Hang on a second.

Got a butt head here driving right on my bumper.

So I don't know what his issue is, but I have to be aware that there are stalkers and people out to get me. So anyway, just on that note, you know, just fair warning, people, I'm always armed, and I'm an old man, so I can't afford to fuck around. I got to take you down as far away from me as possible, because I really don't want to have to risk injuring my body beating the shit out of you. Right. So I'll just, I'll put you down at, you know, however far away you are.

100ft, 30ft, whatever.

Okay, so, hila, it's hell to have to live that way, people, you know, a car comes on up and it's too close to you. Is it just some guy with his own little road rage issues going? Or is it one of these fucking jewish stalkers? And by the way, with it, with one exception, every single one of the stalkers I've had, we've had six so far have been jewish. Now, you know, riddle me that.

How has that happened? Jews are less than 2% of this country. I can't. But of course, I'm pissing them off more than anybody, so that really makes sense at that level.

I've heard that the rabbis think that, oh, well, I won't go into that anyway, though. So. So July 15, some kind of an event? 15th, 16th, I think maybe that's a Sunday. I don't know.

I'll have to go and look on a calendar. But there were data sets, again, indicating that we've got, I mean, it's getting into the day level. So, for instance, our crash in the market is going to be a black Tuesday, okay? Not a black Monday. No, it's not going to take down kryptos.

No, it's not going to take down gold and silver. You know, Joe's dream is Joe's dream, but it's not reality. So anyway, we'll have a black Tuesday. I think it's in May, and I think that's when we get our, the market oscillating, the stock market, NAsdaq, that kind of shit, right? It oscillates up and then crashes.

And that either liberates all of the information about rehypothecation, or the rehypothecation itself causes the crash. You can't tell, right? They're just temporally coincident.

And then, okay, so July 1516, something happens about a month, and five or six days later, we get a brouhaha, which is described by the data sets in such a way that I'm taking it to be a riot. It liberates some documents, and, or there are documents liberated at that time. I mean, it doesn't necessarily mean that the documents are actually coming out of the center of the riot, although they could, we just don't know. But it could be that, you know, at the same time we get these particular riots, we have, you know, Congress releasing a bunch of UFO documents that would satisfy the conditions. So.

But in any event, so it's going to be very event filled summer and lead us into a very serious fucking fall. Now, we now have built into the cake. I shouldn't even use that word, but we now have built into our future. We have famine. Okay?

So there will be areas, large areas, with no harvest this year because of what the Elohim worship calls has done in the destruction of the farms and so on. Now, I think that's what will have Bill Gates be executed. All right? So I think that Bill Gates is going to be assassinated along with a couple of these other people. He's going to be killed.

I don't know if it's going to be an execution or an assassination or what, but we're going to see this kind of thing over these next couple of years. Klaus Schwab, all of these kind of guys are in real deep shit because as this stuff pops off the. The sock, the self organizing collective is savvy enough not to waste our time with the minions. And they're gonna go right after the people on the top. So, you know, there will be orders given from the Elohim worship cult, and they'll say, go off and do this and do that.

Create this chaos and so on. And when the chaos happens, there will be people that will understand this as a temporal marker. And then those people, part of the sock, will go off and assassinate the Elohim worship cult people. And we're not talking just in Austria or Switzerland or wherever. We're talking about full on assault on them all over.

And so this will be part of the period of time when we have the attacks on the synagogues and all of that. So when Klaus Schwab releases it, he wants the attacks on the synagogues, because that's going to favor his program. Right. But what he's not prepared for is this response at the level of the individuals taking out the actual mother wefers themselves. Right?

We know who they are. Wouldn't surprise me to see people like Trudeau targeted. And, you know, all of these people that are listed in the Elohim or listed in the mother weapons, young leaders thing, right? And they're. They're just going to be.

They were so stupid to put their. Their faces out there and do it that way. Anyway, I've got to get the dog out here, and then I've got to go and do my chores. Maybe I can do another one of these on the way back. It's interesting.

And disrupted day. Major clam dig here, all kinds of stuff going on, and it's supposed to rain. You know you had huge chem trailing yesterday. Couldn't believe the number of layers they put up there. And remember, guys, stay safe.

If you can't stay safe, be deadly. And we're coming up to it, guys. So anyway, so keep looking up. May is chemtrail awareness month.

Previous Blog Posts:

View me!

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump – 08-23-2023

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump - 08-23-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Ben Shapiro explains how censorship works

Episode Summary:

Debate Absence:

The discussion starts with Trump explaining his decision not to attend a Fox News debate in Milwaukee. He cites his significant lead in polls and feels it's unnecessary to be questioned by other candidates and a network he views as hostile. He draws parallels to his 2016 campaign experience.

Media Critique:

Trump discusses the decline of television, particularly targeting networks like MSNBC and CNN for what he perceives as a lack of credibility. He claims to have popularized the term "fake news" and suggests that "corrupt news" might be a more fitting description.

Candidates' Critique:

When probed about which candidates he believes shouldn't be running for president, Trump refrains from direct names but hints at individuals like Asa Hutchinson and Chris Christie. He critiques Christie's performance as New Jersey's governor and insinuates that Christie's resentment towards him is due to not receiving a position in Trump's administration.

Epstein's Death:

The conversation touches on the controversial death of Jeffrey Epstein. Trump expresses doubt about Epstein's suicide and criticizes former Attorney General Bill Barr for not conducting a thorough investigation into Epstein's death and the alleged 2020 election fraud.

Political Climate:

Trump reflects on the political atmosphere since his 2015 campaign. He describes a progression from organized protests against him to impeachment attempts. He voices concerns about potential threats to his safety, characterizing his adversaries as "savage animals."

International Relations:

Trump speaks positively about his rapport with global leaders like Kim Jong Un, Xi Jinping, and Vladimir Putin. He believes they held him and the U.S. in higher regard during his tenure. He criticizes Joe Biden's physical and cognitive abilities, suggesting that Biden might not last until the next election. This sparks speculation about Kamala Harris or other potential Democratic contenders.

Debate with Biden:

The interview concludes with Trump reminiscing about his debate with Biden, which was moderated by Chris Wallace. He recalls confronting Biden about a $3.5 million payment from the mayor of Moscow's wife and expresses annoyance that Wallace intervened in the discussion.

#2020Election #AlBaghdadi #Appliances #Arkansas #Atlanta #BillBarr #Biden #California #CableNews #ChrisChristie #ChrisWallace #CNN #Comey #Congress #Conspiracy #conservatives #corrupt #COVID #CrookedJoe #Cuba #coup #debate #DeSantis #DemocratCities #DemocratParty #DistrictAttorney #DurhamReport #Election #ElectionFraud #ElectricCars #EPA #escalation #Fabrizio #FBI #FultonCounty #FoxNews #Georgia #government #HillaryClinton #Impeachment #indictment #inflation #InspectorGeneralHorowitz #Investigation #ISIS #JeffreyEpstein #JoeBiden #KamalaHarris #KimJongUN #Laptop #LosAngeles #MaraLago #McCaabe #McLaughlin #media #military #millions #MikePence #Moscow #MSNBC #NBC #NorthKorea #nuclearwar #Ohio #openborders #Olympics #PalmBeach #PanamaCanal #participated #pollnumbers #Polls #PresidentialRecordsAct #President #PresidentXi #Protests #Putin #Republican #Republicans #Rhinos #Ratings #rigged #Russia #SanFrancisco #senile #Singapore #Solomoni #SouthAmerica #SouthKorea #StaceyAbrams #Tariffs #ThomasJefferson #Tucker #USLeadership #Violence #VoterID #Washington #WaterRestrictors #Whirlpool #Wisconsin

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump - 08-23-2023

Mr. President, thanks for joining us. Thank you. Why aren't you at the Fox News debate tonight in Milwaukee? Well, you know, a lot of people have been asking me that and many people said you shouldn't do them.

But you see the polls have come out and I'm leading by 50 and 60 points and you know, some of them are at one and zero and two who. And I'm saying, do I sit there for an hour or 2 hours, whatever it's going to be, and get harassed by people that shouldn't even be running for president? Should I be doing that? And a network that isn't particularly friendly to me, frankly. They were back in Rhonda sanctimonious like crazy and now they've given up on him.

I mean, it's a lost cause. It reminded me very much of 2016. In 2016 I went through the same stuff and had to fight them all the way and then they became very friendly after I won, or just about when I was winning, but I just felt it would be more appropriate not to do the debate. I don't think it's right to do it if you're leading by 50, 60. I have one problem leading by 70 points and I'm saying why am I doing it?

And I'm going to have eight people, ten people, whoever made the debate. I don't know how many it is, but I'm going to have all these people screaming at me, shouting questions at me, all of which I love answering, I love doing, but it doesn't make sense to do them. So I've taken a pass, as you probably noticed. I'm grateful that you did. It's interesting though, because you spent a lot of your career in television.

You had a top show in television on NBC, but you don't feel the need now running for president to do television, obviously. Do you think television is declining? Well, according to a poll that I guess we just saw, it just came out where it's down like 30, 35%. But I think they were talking referring to cable. I think cable is down because it's lost credibility.

MSNBC or as they say, Ms DNC is so bad, it's so wrong what they write and what they do and what they say. It's fake news, as I said. I think I came up with that term, I hope I did because it's a good one. It's not tough enough anymore. It's corrupt know, really what you do is call corrupt news, but somehow that doesn't play as nicely.

But it is corrupt news. So you have MSNBC and you have CNN, who's absolutely doing no ratings at all. I mean they're dead, but they're doing none because they don't have credibility. They really don't have credibility. Fox is way down, as you know, and the good old days are long ago.

I will say this, it could come back, but they just don't have a lot of credibility, Tucker. You know that perhaps better than anybody. I think it was a terrible move getting rid of you. You were number one on television and all of a sudden we're doing this interview but we'll get bigger ratings using this crazy forum that you're using than probably the debate or competition. When you say there are people on stage who shouldn't be running for president, who do you mean?

Well, I don't want to really use names, but it wouldn't matter too much. A guy like I call him Ada Hutchinson. It's ASA, but I call him Ada. Why do you call him Ada? You know, I could tell you, but I don't want to get myself in a little trouble.

But he's weak and pathetic and I never understood the guy, never knew him. He was the governor of Arkansas. Not a very popular guy. I don't know how that state is such a great state. The people are so incredible in that state and they love me, and I love them.

How does this guy get elected governor of Arkansas? But he's nasty always and has been a guy like Chris Christie. The guy left with a 8% think of it 8% approval rating in New Jersey. Now he's running for president and he runs solely on the basis of let's Get Trump. He's like a savage maniac.

He's like a lunatic. And that's all he talks about. His poll numbers are very, very low. He's about 2%. What's he like?

You know him well. I've been friendly with him over the years, but I couldn't give him a job because I just never trusted him very much. I was just never one of his people that really trusted him. I never gave him the job. And that's one of the reasons he feels so hurt and so betrayed.

And I understand that. I really do. I understand it. But I never gave him he wanted to be different things. He was looking at different elements of the administration and we decided I decided just I didn't want to do it.

And now I'm glad I did because, you see but we had some great people. I had great people. We'll have even better people if we do this because now I know Washington. Before I didn't know Washington, but guys like Bill Barr were terrible. I mean, they were I would say Bushies.

I say that with respect to the Bush family, but they were Bushies. And it doesn't work out for us. It was clear. This is kind of far afield, but it was just interesting. I read Barr's account of his time.

He wrote a book about it, his autobiography, and in it he lies about Jeffrey Epstein's death. Clearly lies. Do you think Epstein killed himself? Sincerely? I don't know.

I will say know he was a fixture in Palm Beach. Yeah, I don't know what Barr said about it either. I have no idea what he said. What did he say he killed himself? Probably.

He said he killed himself and that they were going to do this investigation. They never did the investigation. It's never been public, and they hid it. And why are they doing that? Clearly, Barr knew, but why would Bill Barr be covering up the death of Jeffrey Epstein?

Bill Barr didn't do an investigation on the election fraud either. Okay? He said he did and he pretended he did, but he didn't. McSwain, the US attorney in Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said Barr just wouldn't let him do it was crazy. Barr became so petrified, so frightened of being impeached.

They were going to impeach him. I don't know if you remember it, it's not a big moment in history, but they said, we're going to impeach. They play a much rougher game. The left, the lunatics, and they were going to impeach Bill Barr and he was petrified. Now, how do you not get impeached?

Don't do any of this stuff. But he didn't do the job there. I don't know what he did with Epstein, but possibly do you think it's possible that Epstein was killed? Oh, sure, it's possible. I mean, I don't really believe I think he probably committed suicide.

He had a life with beautiful homes and beautiful everything, and all of a sudden he's incarcerated and not doing very well. I would say that he did, but there are those people, there are many people. I think you're one of them. Right. But a lot of people think that he was killed.

He knew a lot on a lot of people. He was killed. I think the closer you look I'm not a conspiracy person at all. I believe everything I hear. But, yeah, the closer you look into it I mean, the Attorney General of the United States, your Attorney general clearly lied about the Epstein death.

Yeah. Why? Certainly it wasn't well done. They had no cameras, they had no anything. Everybody was sleeping.

And a case could be made. Look, I'm not going to get involved in it, but I can tell you a case could be made either way, but it certainly wasn't the most well run place. So the reason I'm asking you is I'm looking at the trajectory since 2015 when you got into politics for real and then won. It started with protests against you, massive protests, organized protests by the left, and then it moved to impeachment twice. Right.

And now indictment. I mean, the next stage is violence. Are you worried that they're going to try and kill you? Why wouldn't they try and kill you? Honestly, they're savage animals.

They are people that are sick, really sick. You have great people in the Democrat Party. You have great people that are Democrats. Most of the people in our country are fantastic. And I'm representing everybody.

I'm not just Republicans or conservatives. I represent everybody. I'm the president of everybody. But I've seen what they do. I've seen the lengths that they go to when they make up the Russia, Russia, Russia when that's exposed and they go down and Barr should have gone after them and other people should have gone after and they did very late because the Durham report came out.

It was fairly good. It could have been a lot tougher, I guess, but it was fairly good. But it explained how corrupt it was. I'll tell you who did a great job was the Inspector General Horowitz. He did a phenomenal report.

You didn't have to go to Durham. He did it on comey and on, I guess McCabe and some others and it was a vicious it was basically a true report how bad they are. But these people are sick people. These are people that I think they hate our country. You want to know the truth when you see open borders, when you see these policies that they have and so many other things, it's so sad to see we have a country that's very fragile right now.

I've never seen I will say, look, I ran in 16, which was 15, but I ran in 16 election in 16 and there was tremendous spirit in 20. There was even more spirit. We got many millions of we got millions and millions more votes. It wasn't even a contest. People said, well, what do you think of 20?

I said, we did much better. We did. You got to base it on the number of votes. We got many more votes in 20 than we did in 16. But the election was rigged.

It was a rigged election and with COVID they use COVID to cheat a lot of different things and we have so much on it. It's like so easy. But we had judges that didn't want to look, we had people didn't want to get involved. She's a conspiracy theorist. If you say anything about the election but I have never seen spirit like there is right now even coming down here, just the people on the road that are just absolutely going crazy.

And the reason is I think they like me and I know they love my policies. I hope they like me too. A lot of people say they don't like me, but they like my I think they like me. But I have never seen spirit like it is right now. And the reason is because Crooked Joe Biden is so bad.

He's the worst president in the history of our country. I don't think he's going to make it to the gate, but you never know. But he's a corrupt person. So corrupt that I took the name off know I don't do two people at one time. I took the Crooked Hillary and I made it.

I retired the net. That was a good day for her. I bet she was very happy. And I used it for Joe because it's Crooked Joe, but Joe is really but you don't think he's going to make it to November of 20. Well, I think he's worse mentally than he is physically and physically.

He's not exactly a triathlete or any kind of an athlete. You look at him. He can't walk to the helicopter. He walks he can't lift his feet out of the grass. It's only two inches at the white house, right?

It's not a lot, but you watch him, and it looks like he's walking on toothpicks. And then you see him in the beach where he can't lift a chair. You know those chairs are meant to be light, right? They're like, 2oz lift them up. He can't lift the chair.

He can't walk to the chair. And I don't know what they're doing with the beach. This beach is seeming to play a big role, but they love pictures of him on the beach. I think he looks terrible on the beach. Looks terrible on the beach.

Skinny legs. Well, he can't walk through the sand. Sand is not that easy to walk through, but when he walks through it, he can't walk through the sand. And there's somebody in there that thinks he looks fabulous at the beach. I think he looks horrible at the beach.

Plus, the beach doesn't represent what a president's supposed to be doing. He's supposed to be working. He's supposed to be getting us out of that horrible, horrible war that we're very much involved in with Russia and Ukraine. You could do that. You could do that very easily, I believe you could do that very I don't believe he could do it because he's just incompetent.

But that's a war that should end immediately, not because of one side or the other, because hundreds of thousands of people are being killed. Can you imagine you're in an apartment house, and rockets are going into that building and blowing it up and knocking it down? And why should anybody? Human beings is a human, whether they're Russian or Ukrainian or whatever they are. It's got to be stopped, and it can be stopped very easily.

It would have never started if I were president. It would have never started. So back to biden. I'm interested. So you think he's failing?

He obviously is failing. I think it's clear to everybody. But that would make Kamala Harris the candidate. Well, not really. I mean, I guess they'd have maybe a free for all.

A lot of people say she has to remain, for certain reasons, the candidate. She has to I don't think that's true, actually. I don't think that other people would stand for it. She has some bad moments. Her moments are almost as bad as his.

I think his are worse, actually. Yeah, she seems pretty senile, too. She speaks in rhyme. It's weird. It's weird.

But she has bad moments in rhyme. Well, the way she talks the bus will go here, and then the bus will go there, because that's what buses do. It's weird. The whole thing is weird. This is not a president of the United States future.

And I think they probably have some kind of a primary and other people will get could be. I always got along well with him, believe it or not, but could be him. Could be somebody else. He's got a big load on his shoulders because you look at California, what's happened, but I don't know if the American people really the people that vote for him, I don't even know if they know. You look at so many of the things that are going on and people don't seem to be in the old days, if you had a bad record, it meant a lot.

Today, if you have a bad record, it doesn't really mean know. He looks good. He's a nice looking guy, speaks well, but Biden, every time you watch him talking, it's like he's walking on eggs. You're waiting for him to collapse. And he almost always does.

And I got to know the leaders of all of the countries, essentially, but the big ones and the bigger the tougher, the know, it's like sort of I guess maybe that's the way it's supposed to be. But I got to know President Xi of China and Putin and Kim Jong UN. North Korea did a great job with North Korea, kept us out of a nuclear war. We would have 40,000 dead soldiers right now. They'd drop a nuke right on top of the military base.

But we have 40,000 soldiers over there. And I did great. I got along with them great. That's a positive. The press said he said nice things about Kim Jong UN.

I also said horrible things at the beginning. Horrible enough that he wanted to talk and we talked and we met in Singapore. We met actually twice, and we had unbelievable meetings. I know him very well. We were in great shape with him.

What do you think he and Xi and Putin think of Biden? I think they can't believe it. I think they probably say this is some kind of a know. They had great respect for our country. They respected me.

They had great respect for our country when I was there, every one of them. Look, if you go to North Korea, you take a look at what know. The Olympics was dead. South Korea spent billions on the Olympics. Nobody was going to go.

They didn't want to get blown up. They called me and they said, we are going to let the Olympics proceed. This is North Korea. I said, you should go into the Olympics, put your athletes in. It wasn't know, they were big on athletes know, famine.

But they went in and they actually participated. And within about two days, the entire thing was sold out. And if it wasn't me, that would have never happened. But I got along very well with him and that's a positive thing. He does have massive nuclear power by the way, and if Hillary would have gotten in, or if the Obama thought process continued, it would have been a nuclear war.

Absolutely. With North Korea, he was expecting to go into a war, and it would have been a nuclear war. So do you think the rest of the world looks on at Biden and thinks someone else has got to be running the government? Well, somebody else has to be. I don't think he's capable of doing anything.

Look, when I debated him, I said, how come? And this was in front of probably not a friend of yours, Chris Wallace. He was the moderator, not a friend. I said, Why is it he wants to be Mike, but he doesn't have the talent? It's one of those bitchy little man.

He wanted to be his father, but he didn't have the talent of his father was great. His father little fussy man. His father interviewed me in 60 Minutes. It was actually a ten. Can you believe his father had talent?

At least I may have been the only guy that he gave a good 60 Minutes to. He was rough, really. Father was tough. He was great, though. He was great at what he did.

But Chris Wallace was so upset, he was guarding this guy who wouldn't do a show. By the way, I didn't mind Chris Wallace because he wouldn't do Biden, wouldn't do a show, and it was very obvious. He kept asking him and asking, but he wouldn't do the show. So I figured he's got to like me. But he came from a different planet.

But remember when I asked the question, why is it that the mayor of Moscow's wife is allowed to give you three and a half million dollars? Don't forget, that was brought up now. It's brought up all the time, but that was brought up by me long before anyone ever heard of it. I said, the mayor of Moscow's wife giving you three and a half million dollars. What did you do to deserve three and a half million dollars to Biden?

And Chris Wallace said, this has nothing to do with the debate. He got in the way of the question. No. Well, it was crazy. And I said, well, wait a minute.

He got three and a half million from the mayor of Moscow's wife. Now, people forget that, but if you go back and take a look, you will see. And Chris Wallace didn't want me to ask that question. I said, I think it's a very appropriate question. It turned out to be much more appropriate than people thought.

Amazing. So do you have a preference in assuming you're the Republican nominee and all goes as you plan it to go? Do you have a preference in who you run against? In many ways, I'd love to run against him because his record is so bad. It's still horrible when you look at inflation, everything else.

But others also have very bad records. I mean, California is a bad record. So should it be Gavin, or should it be somebody else? When I look at San Francisco, what's happened to that incredible city that was one of the greatest cities in the world just a short while ago, and now it's very sad when you look at it. Los Angeles, every city, practically all the Democrat run cities, you know, Republican run cities are doing very nicely because they arrest people when you have crimes, and they don't go after political candidates because they think it's know.

I mean, it's been amazing. My poll numbers are the highest they've ever, but because people understand can I ask you that gets back to my original question. So if the protest didn't work, you got elected anyway. Impeachment didn't work twice. Obviously, indictment is not working.

Your poll numbers go up. When they raided Mar a Lago in August of last year, your numbers went up. They can indict you 20 times, and you're not going to lose the Republican primary because of that. Well, it makes it look even more ridiculous. I mean, the four indictments, and maybe there'll be more.

I don't know. These people are crazy, but they're counterproductive. So if you chart it out, it's an escalation is what I'm saying. So what's next? After try to put you in prison for the rest of your life?

That's not working. So don't they have to kill you now? I think the people of our country don't get enough credit for how smart they are, and I'm not sure I would have said this ten years ago, but they get it. They really get it. When somebody gets indicted, your poll numbers go down.

When somebody gets indicted, you announce, ladies and gentlemen, I'll be leaving to spend time with my family and to fight for the rest of my life on this stuff. But you're out of politics. I got indicted four times. All trivia nonsense. Bullshit.

It's all bullshit. It's horrible. When you look and you look at what they're doing, the boxes, hoax, I'm covered by the Presidential Records Act. I'm allowed to do exactly that. He's not covered, and he's got 25 times the number of boxes, and he's got them stored in Chinatown.

He's got him stored in a Flimsy garage underneath his Corvette at Penn. And by the way, at Penn, he gets millions of dollars. China pays this guy millions of dollars. See, I think he's the most corrupt president we've ever had, and he also has the distinction of being the most incompetent. And I believe both I mean, he's both incompetent and corrupt.

I actually believe he's compromised because China knows so much about him. They know where the money comes from. They know where it is, who paid it, and they probably paid it well, they do pay penn, and he gets a million dollars. I think he takes $999,000 because it keeps it a little bit under a million like, by a dollar. But he, in many ways, is a Manchurian candidate.

We have a Manchurian candidate. And he's afraid to tell Russia to get out of Cuba. He's afraid to tell China to get out of Cuba. China now is building. Think of this.

China's building military installations in Cuba. The Cuban population of Miami is not too happy because they're never going to be able to go back. And you don't even hear about it. And the worst culprit is the press, the media. Because normally when I first heard that that China is building installations in Cuba and installations means military, you know, they said, just some communication.

They did that on the islands with Japan. They took the island, they started this massive construction. And they told everybody, including the Japanese. The Japanese have to be very careful. They told everybody that this is a housing development.

They got to build a housing development. And I said, how come the runway is 20,000ft long? Private jets need 4000ft. They don't need 20,000ft. The big ones need 20,000ft.

They don't even need 20. And I looked at the runway, I said, that's the largest runway ever built, both in width and length for housing development. There's nobody that has a plane that big that you would have a runway. That's why allowed to conduct imperialism in our hemisphere. Well, yeah.

And it's far beyond Cuba. It's all over South America. Yeah, in the Caribbean. So we built a thing called the Panama Canal. We lost 35,000 people to the mosquito.

Malaria. We lost 35,000 people building. We lost 35,000 people because of the mosquito. Vicious. They had to build under nets.

It was one of the true great wonders of the world. As he said. One of the nine wonders of the world. No, it was one of the seven. This happened a little while ago, you know, says nine wonders of the world.

You could make nine wonders. He would have been better off if he stuck with the nine and just said, yeah, I think it's nine. But this is one of the true seven wonders of the world. And you take a look at the Panama Canal. It was such an incredible engineering marvel.

We sold it under Jimmy Carter. We sold it to Panama for $1. The following day, they quadrupled the amount of money that ships had to pay to get across. They didn't lose one ship. And now they've made it much bigger.

And now they've widened it. They've doubled it, right? They've more than doubled it. And it's one of the most profitable things anytime. It's just incredible.

Right. We gave it away for $1. China now controls it. They actually control the Panama Canal. They run it.

They control it. And we shouldn't let that happen. And we can't let China be in Cuba. And they'll get out. If I'm president, they'll get out.

Because I had a very good relationship with President Xi, but he respected this country. He respected me and he'll get out. And we can't let them run the Panama Canal. We built the Panama Canal should have never been given to Panama. We should have had it, but we gave it for $1.

Think of it, they quadrupled in one day. They lifted the fees, which know, pretty big for these massive ships to go through, right? Rather than going around the Cape and all the tremendous storms. Such beauty, such know, when you it's beautiful stuff, but you didn't want to get caught in those storms. Those were storms that wiped out the biggest ships.

And we go through the Panama Canal. We built it and we gave it away for $1. Think of that. How stupid are we? We have done the stupidest things in this country and now we have a president that can't put two sentences together, can't speak, can't walk, can't talk.

I don't think he gets to the starting gate. But these people do miracles. I mean, he ran out of his basement and you got away with that one because of COVID So he sort of got away with it. They cheated on the election. But you have people that are very smart, but they're fascists and they're radical left lunatics, and they're destroying our country with the all electric cars and the windmills all over the place, which, by the way, don't work.

And they're all most of made in China, for the most part. They're made in China. Germany a little bit, but China. But you look at what's happening to our country. Even no voter ID.

I mean, why don't they want voter ID? There's only one reason they don't want voter ID. Because they want to cheat. Who doesn't want, you know, the Democrat Convention, the last one, they had voter ID that was this big. It looked like a prison card, this big on their chest.

You walked in, they had your picture, your this, your fingerprint. They owed everything. The most incredible voter ID I've ever seen. That was to get into the Democrat National Convention, but to get into vote. If you buy groceries, if you buy practically anything now, you have ID on a card, credit cards or otherwise.

But don't you think it's racist to have to show your ID? Well, they probably say that they use anything not to show ID, because voter ID is pretty simple. And we could go back and we should go back to all paper ballots. Voter ID. Same day voting.

You know, France did it. France had mail in ballots and it was terrible. Anytime you have mail in ballots, you're going to have massive cheating on your elections. Anytime. Not just the presidential election.

Anytime you have isn't that the whole point of oh, yeah, sure, it's the whole point. That's their whole point. They want to cheat. Yeah, they have to cheat because their policies are so bad that if they didn't cheat, they couldn't get elected. Who.

Wants open borders, who wants high taxes, who wants high interest rates, who wants to not be able to use a gas stove or have to drive an electric car, which you have a four hour drive, but the car only goes an hour and a half. You have to charge it. The happiest moment for somebody in an electric car is the first ten minutes. In other words, you get it charged. And now for ten minutes, the unhappiest part is the next hour, because you're petrified that you're not going to be fined to another charger.

I'm not knocking electric cars. They're fine. They're fine. But if people want to buy a gasoline car or hybrid hybrids are pretty good, actually, but they should be allowed to buy. They don't want to do any of this.

So right now, California is in a big brownout because their grid is a disaster. The grid all over the country is sort of a disaster, but the grid in California and yet they want to have, in a very short period of time, millions and millions of cars going off that grid. Essentially, it doesn't work. So plug your car into a grid that's fake. You should be able to buy an electric car.

Electric cars could be fine. If you drive short distances and you want to have whatever and you have plugins everywhere you go, they could be fine. But you got to have gasoline cars. You got to have everything. Let people buy everything.

Now, the new thing is your heating systems in the house, they don't want you to have a modern day heating system. They want you to use a heating system that will cost you at least $10,000 to buy and won't work very well. None of the stuff works as well. One of the things I did with EPA is you have states, many states, most of the states have so much water it comes out of heaven, right? The water pours down and you have it.

It's there. It's got to go wherever it goes, into the oceans, whatever. It's not like a big problem. Now, in some states, they have a problem. You have some desert areas and all, and for that it's okay.

But they have sinks where no water comes out. You turn it on, no water comes out. No water comes out of the shower. No water is allowed to go into the washing machine for your dishes or for your clothing. And I avoided all of that.

Wait, they have sinks where no water comes out. You have restrictors when I say no water, very little water. You want to wash your hands, right? Yeah. And you've seen this, and you turn on the sink and it's very little.

Or do you want to wash your beautiful hair, right? And you're standing under a shower. Then the suds never go. The water comes out very slowly. I'm sure you've seen this.

It usually takes place in new hotels. And new homes. Yeah, you take a drill and take the well, you can, but now they make it, so you can't do that. So is league. They have a restrictor.

It's called a restrictor, and it restricts the water from coming out. So I ended all of that. And you have to see these. They let the water come out. You know what people do?

They wash their hands like five times longer or in the washing machine, they'll press for their, let's say the dishwasher. They'll press it, then they'll press it about seven or eight times. They'll end up using more water, and it still won't be very good. I met with the head of Whirlpool. They were practically going out of business during my administration, and they said to me from Ohio, credible, great state, I love Ohio.

And they were really doing badly because people were dumping washing machines all over, mostly from South Korea, but also from China. And he was explaining it's just a terrible situation. I said, Let me ask you, how's the quality? He says, we're better, but they are good enough quality. But of course he's going to say that, but they are better.

He said, but they don't allow us they're dumping these machines, they're cutting us in half, they're killing us. And on top of it, the government won't let us use water in our machines. I mean, he shows me, like a quarter of a bottle of water that's supposed to be washing clothing, and I freed it all up. And I put tariffs on these countries that were selling and the machines coming into the country, and that company went from all the washing machine companies, they make washing machines, they make dryers, they make all of the different machines that do this kind of work, including dishwashers. And they went from a disaster area to being just thriving.

But can I ask, they love me in that part of Ohio. Well, I bet they do. But why should EPA no one at EPA was elected by anybody. Why do they have the power to decide how much water your washing machine uses? Shouldn't Congress, in a democracy, get to vote on that?

Yeah, you could say that. They do things that are not very that's my you. If you get elected again, go back to Washington. How do you keep the agencies under control? How do you keep FBI and CIA specifically under control?

The way you do it? Like, I fired Comey. That was a big deal. A lot of people said, and I fired them very early. Somebody said, oh, I wish you would have fired them.

There's a real question about firing them anyway, you understand? Because when they have a ten year term, there is a question. I fired Comey. That was a great thing. If I didn't fire Comey, maybe I wouldn't be talking to you, or I'd be talking to you about real estate or something else other than politics, right?

That was a coup. In my opinion. That was a very sick deal. That was the insurance policy. You remember the insurance policy?

Oh, she's going to win, darling. She's going to win. But just in case she doesn't, we have an insurance policy. An insurance policy. She was what they were doing, and we caught them with that.

That was a very important tweet, or whatever it was text. It was a big deal. That was a big deal. The insurance policy, she's going to win 100 million to one. That's not good odds.

At least they gave me one, right? 100 million to one. But just in case she doesn't win, we have an insurance policy. And everybody said, that's strange, that's strange. But we caught all that because I fired, call me.

Because when I fired, call me. It was like throwing a rock into a hornet's nest, into a nest of bees, and the place went crazy. So when you were president, are you confident that you knew everything, say, CIA was doing around? No, I'm not. It's a very interesting group of people.

I had very good relationships, I thought, but I was a little surprised when I got out. Know, things go on. Look it's, what were you surprised by? I was surprised, I think, at some of the people. I was surprised that I had a group of people we killed, many using the CIA, I have to say this bad, very bad actors.

We were very good at it. You look at Solomoni, you look at Al Baghdadi, bigger than Osama bin Laden. I mean, Osama bin Laden. But Al Baghdadi did. ISIS.

And he was rebuilding ISIS very strongly. And that was the CIA that did that. That was really us that did that. That was really us that did that. And Solomoni was us that did that.

Not so much CIA, but we did some very good work with the CIA. But I started you know, when I looked at the 51 intelligence agents saying that the laptop from hell was Russia disinformation, when I took a look at that, I said, that's a horrible thing. They knew it wasn't. They knew it was not. And by the way, you're talking about cheating on the election.

McLaughlin and Fabrizio, great pollsters, they said a thing like that, plus other things, meant anywhere from ten to 17% of the vote would change. Whatever happened to Mike Pence? You've always been nice to Pence. I've never heard you criticize Pence. You've defended him in public many, many times.

He's out there attacking you. What is that? So Mike wants to run for president. You got to understand, in my opinion, mike Pence had the absolute right to send the votes back to the legislatures, the Democrats. And everybody said, you don't have the right.

In other words, I said, Is he a human conveyor belt? You mean if he finds fraud in Pennsylvania, in Georgia, in any of these states, arizona, he has to send them to Mitch McConnell, right? That's right, sir. Well, if he finds fraud, he has said so. He's just so he's a conveyor belt, boom, put him in.

I said, I don't agree with that. And we had some lawyers not all, we had some lawyers that said, no, you do have the right to send them back to the legislatures to be rechecked. Because if you looked at what went on in Wisconsin, who, by the way, now agree with me, wisconsin has been virtually other than the fact they're not allowed to do anything statutorily, but Wisconsin has mean what they found is incredible. I mean, we won Wisconsin, but Mike Pence had the right, in my opinion, to send the best do you ever talk to him now? No, I haven't spoken to him in a long time.

I was very disappointed in him. I didn't want to do what Thomas Jefferson did. Thomas Jefferson, it was Georgia, and it was here, ye hear, the great state of Georgia is not capable or allowed to tabulate their votes. And Thomas Jefferson, who was the vice president, said, is Georgia sure that they cannot tabulate their votes? Georgia is sure he didn't send it back and have them redo it.

He said, we will keep the votes of the great state of Georgia for Thomas Jefferson and his president. I didn't ask him for that. Could have done that too, but I thought that would bring turmoil. I asked him to send them back to his legislature, to the know in Wisconsin, let's say. But why didn't he?

I mean, you'd worked together for four years, you're the president, he's VP, you say you're aligned on everything. I think he got very bad advice, I really do. Now, let me tell you what happened. I sat there with a few people. I think his lawyer was in the room too.

His lawyer was very much against it. There were other lawyers that felt you could do it. It was one of those things. I think you could have done it. I think you can always do something if you see fraud or if you see problems.

But it's very interesting. So after the election was over, the Rhinos got together with the Democrats and they redid the election so you couldn't do it anymore. So then I called the people, I said, So in other words, you're saying I was right, you could do it. Yes, you could do it. In other words, they took the Voting act and they redid it so the vice president no longer has the power to do what I said he could do.

So when that happened, I said, wow. And you'd look some of these Democrats in the eye and they'd say, he has absolutely no right to do it. And immediately after the election, they met Rhinos, Kadema Maul and Democrats, and they approved legislation that takes away the right of the vice president to do it. So I said, ah, so you're saying I was right. The vice president did have the right to do it, and they said, yes, he did.

So if you're saying they stole it from you last time, why wouldn't they do the same this time? Oh, well, they'll try. They're going to be trying. Yeah, and not only me. Look, DeSantis is out.

I think he's gone. So he was at a level, people have figured him out, he's gone. But if somebody else got in other than me, they'll go at him just as viciously as they did me. These people are sick. They will go after them.

And a lot of people say they won't be able to hold up. I do get credit for holding up quite well, I must tell you. I think it's how do you do that? How do you get indicted every week and stay cheerful? I think it's a lot easier because I'm so high in the polls, because it means the people get it.

The people see it's a fraud. The people see it like this horrible district attorney from just a little while ago, from essentially Atlanta, that's Fulton County, she said, basically, I don't have any right to challenge an election. Well, what about Stacey Abrams? What about Hillary Clinton? What about all of these Democrats that are still challenging my election?

The same people that are saying he's challenging an election challenged my election, and they did it with Slates. They did it with all sorts of things. They were very bad, very bad about it. But basically they're suing me. And they're saying, you don't have any right to challenge, and if you challenge an election, we're going to indict you and put you in jail.

So what they're doing is they've weaponized and don't kid yourself, the DOJ and Biden and the whole group, they're watching all of this stuff. They love the local stuff. The DA in Manhattan, not only that, they put one of the DOJ top people into the Manhattan DA's office to run things. They don't even have a case against me. It's not even a case.

Everyone says, even the Democrats say, you can't bring these cases. You have no case. The attorney General or the district attorney. Fanny, fanny Willis in Atlanta, she's getting killed, basically. She's saying Trump doesn't have the right to criticize an election.

But you've been around long enough now. You've seen many elections criticized. I mean, Hillary Clinton goes crazy every time she talks. She says he's not the president. Jimmy Carter said he's not the president.

Well, I am the president. Hillary Clinton called me, by the way, 302 in the morning to congratulate me the night of the election. Did her voice crack? Well, her voice was very different. I will say I won't get into that.

But what do you mean, her voice was very different? Don't forget, they were all celebrating at 05:00 in the afternoon, and I came home. And I said, I think we won. I felt we won because the rallies are so big. We'd go to Wisconsin and we'd go to Georgia, we'd go to different states in Michigan, we'd have rallies in Pennsylvania, we had 58,000 people in Butler.

And I'd said, how are we losing this? How do you have a rally where you have from 50 to 100,000 people, many of them united, seven a day for a couple of days? That's a lot. That's a lot. These are big rallies, too.

And I didn't hold back. I didn't say, let's make them little, let's do abbreviations, right? But they challenged this stuff. Hillary called me up and conceded. Now, the word is that Obama said you have to do that, but she called up and totally conceded.

But now every time you see her on television, she's saying like, well, she's challenging the election, so that would mean that she should be indicted, but that would mean also that Stacey Abrams in Georgia should be indicted because she still thinks she won the election for governor. She still thinks that she's never recanted. Do you think Stacey Abrams will be indicted for that? No, of course not. She won't be.

The Democrats don't get indicted for things like that. They don't get impeached. No, it's a different thing. With that being said, yes, I had great support when they did impeachment hoax number one and impeachment hoax number two. Jim Jordan.

The House was fantastic, and actually, the Senate was very good for me, other than Mitch McConnell. I think if he had, it's too bad. I endorsed him. He was begging, he was going to lose that race, and I endorsed him. And he ended up winning the race because of my endorsement.

He was down. He was going to lose to Amy McGrath. She was $90 million in cash, all set to go. She was leading by three. He was going down.

I did him a favor, and then three, four months later, he really wanted to impeach me. He's a bad guy, but if you look at what's going on politically, so interesting, the level of loyalty is different in politics than it is in normal life. I will say, with that being said, I've had great loyalty also. But the house was fantastic. The Senate was very know.

They overrode Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell, in my opinion, was trying to get senators to impeach me, especially for the second one. And on the first one, he acted very, very slow. He should have gone much faster. But Mitch McConnell wanted to and the senators went up to guys that are subservient to him because he gives know, he gives them money, he gives them a lot of money.

He raises some money and he gives it to him, and therefore they do what he said. That's the only form of leadership he's got. So, last question. If you're elected president again, what's your top, your number one priority. When you ran last time, you said, I will build a wall.

This time, your bottom line, top promise to the so you can do numerous things at the same time, of course, but let's say number one is a border and taking hundreds of thousands of criminals that have been allowed into our country and getting them out and bringing them back to their country. Guatemala, by the way, not only the four countries that we think of as neighbors all over the world. Last month we had 149 countries represented. Think of it, we had 149 countries represented, Tucker, from places that many people never even heard of coming into our country. And they're coming in from mental institutions, and they're coming in from prisons.

They're emptying out their prisons all over South America. They're emptying out their mental institutions. Terrorists are pouring into our country. We have no idea. I had the strongest border in the history of our country, and I built almost 500 miles of wall.

They like to say, oh, was it less? No, I built 500 miles. In fact, if you check with the authorities on the border, we built almost 500 miles of wall. And I had another 200 that I was going to build. It's like water, it seeks, and we're going to build another 200.

We built it, it was all set to go. All they had to do is install it. It would have taken three weeks. And that's when I found out. I said, I think these people actually want open borders.

The first thing I would do would be I would seal up the border good and tight, except for people that want to come in legally. Do you think we're moving towards civil war?

There's tremendous passion and there's tremendous love. January 6 was a very interesting day because they don't report it properly. I believe it was the largest crowd I've ever spoken before. And you know, some of the crowds I've spoken before, and like, July 4 on the mall, I think they had a million people there. But I think that the biggest crowd I've ever spoken before was on January 6.

And people that were in that crowd, a very, very small group of people, and we said patriotically and peacefully. Peacefully and patriotically, right? Nobody ever says that go peacefully and patriotically. But people that were in that crowd that day, very small group of people went down there. And then there are a lot of scenarios that we can talk about, but people in that crowd said it was the most beautiful day they've ever experienced.

There was love in that crowd. There was love and unity. I have never seen such spirit and such passion and such love. And I've also never seen simultaneously and from the same people, such hatred of what they've done to our country. So do you think it's possible that there's open conflict?

We seem to be moving towards something. I don't know because I don't know what it you know, I can say this. There's a level of passion that I've never seen, there's a level of hatred that I've never seen, and that's probably a bad combination. Donald Trump. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Very much. Thank you. That is a bad combination, by the way. Bad combination.

Thank you.

Episode Summary:

The text discusses the U.S. debt ceiling and national debt, expressing that efforts to curtail spending are futile and mere theater. It argues that the Fiat monetary system is at a breaking point, with imminent financial problems and potential hyperinflation. The author mentions recent negotiations, highlighting victories for Republicans in pipeline control and the Democrats in debt ceiling suspension until 2025. A helicopter hovering over a property and the actions of the International Monetary Fund and the Bank of International Settlements are also mentioned. The author predicts a serious, but not total, break in the financial system.

The text discusses the fear among groups over the weakening of the dollar, leading to a possible crash in the financial system. This includes predictions of soaring interest rates, the breakdown of relations between banks, and subsequent failure. It emphasizes a major upheaval with localized government breakdowns across Western nations and a shift in social order. The text also focuses on internal power structures within the Khazarian group, their connections with Jewish society, and the expected exposure of their inner workings. The end of fiat currency and an increase in whistleblowers are foreseen.

The text describes a grim forecast of impending financial collapse and social unrest in the U.S. and Europe. The writer asserts that leftist ideologies and external manipulations are leading to economic chaos and violence. They depict an invasion in Europe, predicted internal battles in North America, and the expected fallout of a financial crash. Furthermore, the writer contends that democratic support is not as strong as it appears, and the leftist ideologies comprise a minority. They emphasize a dire situation that will potentially lead to warfare, chaos, and a slow, painful recovery process.

The text touches on the distinctions between Khazarians and Jewish people, expressing a belief that the Khazarians are content to hide behind the Jews. The speaker mentions Kali Yuga, a period in Hindu mythology, likening current happenings to this era but seeing it as a fading concept. They speculate that most religious movements today may not last for centuries due to the evolution of humanity in intelligence and spirit. Lastly, they briefly mention the debt ceiling, emphasizing that negotiations and drama are the real focus and allude to something significant happening in June.

Insidious Meme

Tag: violence

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump – 08-23-2023

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump - 08-23-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Ben Shapiro explains how censorship works

Episode Summary:

Debate Absence:

Media Critique:

Candidates' Critique:

Epstein's Death:

Political Climate:

International Relations:

Debate with Biden:

Ep. 19 Debate Night with Donald J Trump - 08-23-2023

Insidious Meme

Time Is Not Complicated It Is Complex - 05-14-2024

Related posts:

Previous Blog Posts:

Justice vs Law - 04-11-2024

Related posts:

Previous Blog Posts: