Episode Summary:

The Supreme Court case centered around the state of Colorado's attempt to remove Donald Trump from the 2024 election ballot, citing his alleged involvement in an insurrection. Justice Clarence Thomas questioned the Colorado removal team for historical precedents of states removing federal candidates, highlighting the lack of examples and the unprecedented nature of Colorado's actions. The case delved into the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and whether it applied to presidential candidates, with justices and legal teams discussing historical contexts, the amendment's wording, and its implications for state and federal powers in election processes.

Throughout the oral arguments, justices expressed skepticism towards the arguments presented by Colorado's legal team, questioning the logical and historical basis of disqualifying a presidential candidate based on state-level decisions. The case brought to light concerns about federalism, state rights, and the potential for a single state to influence national electoral outcomes. MSNBC's coverage of the case suggested a consensus among justices that the ambiguity in the law should favor allowing candidates to run, thereby preserving the democratic process.

Donald Trump's reaction to the proceedings was positive, viewing the day in court as favorable to his case. He criticized the current administration's handling of various national and international issues, positioning himself as a strong candidate for the 2024 election. The case's outcome holds significant implications for the balance of state and federal powers in electoral matters, the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, and the broader context of American democracy and its resilience against divisive legal challenges.

#SCOTUS #Trump #Colorado #2024Election #14thAmendment #JusticeThomas #Federalism #StateRights #Democracy #ElectoralLaw #Constitution #AmericanPolitics #PresidentialElection #LegalPrecedent #Insurrection #BallotAccess #JudicialSkepticism #MSNBC #ElectoralInclusivity #AdministrationCritique #LegalChallenges #NationalImpact #ElectoralIntegrity #HistoricCase #SupremeCourtDecision #VoterRights #ElectionLaw #PoliticalDebate #LegalInterpretation #ConstitutionalLaw #StatePower #FederalElection #Election2024 #TrumpCandidacy #AmericanDemocracy

Key Takeaways:

The case examines Colorado's attempt to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot over insurrection claims.
Justice Thomas highlighted the lack of precedent for a state removing a federal candidate.
Discussions focused on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and the balance between state and federal electoral powers.
Justices showed skepticism toward Colorado's arguments, suggesting a preference for maintaining electoral inclusivity.
The outcome of this case could significantly impact the legal foundations of American democracy and the balance of power between state and federal authorities in electoral matters.

Predictions:

The Supreme Court may rule in favor of allowing Trump on the ballot, emphasizing electoral inclusivity.
A ruling against Colorado could set a precedent limiting states' powers in federal elections.

Key Players:

President Donald Trump
Secretary of State Jenna Griswold
Justice Clarence Thomas
Justice Kagan
Justice Sotomayor
Justice Gorsuch
Justice Kavanaugh
Justice Kitanji Jackson
Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Justice John Roberts

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

SCOTUS - Trump Vs Colorado - 02-09-2024

Could that be incoming? It was a very good day for Donald Trump. After all, in the Supreme Court oral arguments on the Colorado ballot removal case, we've got the highlights. We covered the full thing when it was live here on our channel.

And so if you want to watch the full thing in total, be sure to watch that full video. But we got the highlights condensed and consolidated. And a lot of what we heard today is a lot of what we've been saying here. Exactly. In fact, I thought Kitanji was asked the explicit question about why was the word president not included in the sentence if it applied to the president.

We're all scratching our heads going, wow. So if Ketanji is on board, if Judge Kagan is skeptical, if Soto mayor maybe is on board, are we going to have a 90 opinion? We're going to see? But even MSNBC, their reaction is saying, yeah, this is pretty bad for the Colorado ballot removal litigants, because what they're asking the court to do is insane. And we're going to hear what happened.

I've got a bunch of the highlights, some very good clips before we get into the reaction. And of course, Donald Trump also had some reaction to this as well. Jenna Griswold was also on scene. We'll see what she looked like after she was leaving. Looked like she may have been a little unhappy with the status of the oral arguments, but starting the day off, was Judge Clarence Thomas one of the best of all time?

He was asking Jason Murray about his position on examples of when a state removed a federal candidate from the ballot. Remember, this is about removing Trump off of the 2024 election ballots. Colorado said that he is allowed to be removed. The lower level court said that Trump committed an insurrection, but the 14th amendment didn't apply. Then the Supreme Court in Colorado reversed that and said that it does.

Trump cannot be on the ballot. So what Clarence Thomas is asking, he's asking the Colorado removal team, what examples do you have of other states that have removed federal presidential candidates from the list? Give me some examples, please. States have created under their article one and article two powers to run elections. But it would seem that particularly after Reconstruction, after the compromise of 1877, and during the period of redeemers, that you would have that kind of conflict.

There were a plethora of Confederates still around. There were any number of people who would continue to either run for state offices or national offices. So that would suggest that there would at least be a few examples of national candidates being disqualified, if your reading is correct. Well, there were certainly national candidates who were disqualified by Congress, refusing to seat them. I understand that, but that's not this case.

Did states disqualify them? That's what we're talking about here. I understand Congress would not seat them. Other than the example I gave, no. But again, your honor, that's not surprising, because there wouldn't have been.

States certainly wouldn't have the authority to remove a citizen. So what's the purpose of the section three states were sending people? The concern was that the former confederate states would continue being bad actors, and the effort was to prevent them from doing this. And you're saying that. Well, this also authorized states to disqualify candidates.

So what I'm asking you for, if you are right, what are the examples? Well, your honor, the examples are states excluded many candidates for state office, individuals holding state offices. We have a number of published cases of states. I understand that the states controlling state elections and state positions. What we are talking about here are national candidates.

I understand you look at phoner or foot, Shelby, foot or McPherson. They all talk about, of course, the conflict after the civil war. And there were people who felt very strongly about retaliating against the south, the radical Republicans, but they did not think about authorizing the south to disqualify national candidates. And that's the argument you're making. And what I would like to know is, do you have any examples of this?

Many of those historians have filed briefs in our support in this case, making the point that the idea of the 14th Amendment was that both states and the federal government would ensure rights, and that if states failed to do so, the federal government certainly would also step in. But I think the reason why there aren't examples of states doing this is an idiosyncratic one of the fact that elections worked differently back then. States have a background power under Article two and the 10th amendment to run presidential elections. They didn't use that power to police ballot access until about the 1890s. And by the 1890s, everyone had received amnesty, and these issues had become moot.

So I don't think the history tells us, sort of look at Justice Thomas's questions sort of from the 30,000 foot level. I mean, the whole point of the 14th amendment was to restrict state power, right? States shall not bridge privileges, immunity. They won't deprive people of property without due process. They won't deny equal protection.

And on the other hand, it augmented federal power under section five. Congress has the power to enforce it. So wouldn't that be the last place that you'd look for authorization for the states, including confederate states, to enforce, implicitly authorized to enforce the presidential election process. That seems to be a position that is at war with the whole thrust of the 14th Amendment and very ahistorical indeed. John Roberts, so nice exchange between those two.

We're always concerned about John Roberts because he's a little bit squishy on some issues. But the breakdown is, what was the basis of all of this? What were we trying to do? We didn't want the states to have more unruly power. Right.

Like, we just got done with a civil war. We kind of wanted to give the feds a little bit more authority, make sure the 14th Amendment, the Reconstruction amendments, all kind of synced up all the states. And so you're saying that as a result of that, which gave the feds a lot more power and kind of mandated that we're all under these reconstruction rules now. Like, game's over. This is the new set.

This is the. Know mom's back home. This is the new game. You're saying that in that framework, you also gave one single state the right to disqualify, again, a federal president. Okay, you say that.

Okay. And did anybody do it? No. Okay. So it just feels like it's out of alignment.

Roberts is pulling that in, and Clarence Thomas, of course, hit that mark as well. Now, Gorsuch asked a very good question that basically stumped the other side. And this is the Colorado litigant who is trying to make this argument. But the question is about whether or not the 14th amendment is self executing. So when something happens, does Congress have to pass legislation?

Do you have to have a trial to find someone's an insurrectionist? Or does it just happen? Because what they're arguing in Colorado is that it just happened. It's self executing, because they need that to be the argument, because Congress didn't do anything else. They actually acquitted Trump of insurrection in the Senate.

Right. So there was no legislation that was passed to enable all of this to happen. They just said, after January 6, Trump is now an insurrection. And he. I guess the question is, what happens then?

If he's an insurrectionist and he's now disqualified from office, what happens to the people who are under the president? So does he still have any power? I mean, if it's automatic and he's disqualified on January 7, does he have any power at all to say anything to anybody? Here's Judge Gorsuch. Three speaks about disqualification from holding office.

You say he is disqualified from holding office from the moment it happens. Correct. But nevertheless, it operates. You say that there's no legislation necessary. I thought that was the whole theory of your case.

And no procedure happens automatically. Well, certainly you need a procedure in order to have any remedy to enforce the disqualification, which is. That's a whole separate question. That's. The de facto doctrine doesn't work here.

Okay, put that aside. He's disqualified from the moment self executing done. And I would think that a person who would receive a direction from that person, the president, former president, in your view, would be free to act as he or she wishes without regard to that, he's disqualified. I don't think so. Because I think, again, the de facto officer doctrine would nevertheless come into play to say, this is no de facto.

That doesn't work, Mr. Murray, because de facto officer is to ratify the conduct that's done afterward and insulate it from judicial review. Put that aside. I'm not going to say it again. Put it aside.

Okay. I think Justice Lee is asking a very different question, a more pointed one, a more difficult one for you. I understand, but I think it deserves an answer. On your theory, would anything compel a lower official to obey an order from, in your view, the former president? I'm imagining a situation where, for example, a former president was.

A president was elected, and they were 25, and they were ineligible to office. But nevertheless, they were. No, we're talking about section three. Please don't change the hypothetical. Okay?

Please don't change the hypothetical. I know. I like doing it, too, but please don't do it. The point I'm trying to make is he's disqualified from the moment he committed an insurrection. Whoever it is, whichever party that happens, boom, it happened.

What would compel. And I'm not going to say it again, so just try and answer the question. If you don't have an answer, fair enough. We'll move on. What would compel a lower official to obey an order from that individual?

Because ultimately, we have statutes and rules. No. So he's going to go out. Right? And Gorsuch left it alone after that.

He said, well, okay, so you just say it's automatic. So, like, the country doesn't have a president. Like, on January 7, it's all done because it's self executing. Right? It's obviously logically insane.

And Gorsuch calls him out appropriately. We got a quick one from Kavanaugh. He says, you know, you guys keep saying that the state should be free to remove him because he's been charged with an insurrection. And if there's no mechanism to remove him. Country's going to be subsumed in Trump's tyranical know, utopia.

But can't we just charge him with insurrection? Can't we just indict him if you think that he actually was an insurrectionist? Or do we have to have these little fake hearings where you just incorporate Liz Cheney's January 6 report into the trial record? What is the point of having the insurrection statute if we don't actually use it? He had the opportunity to call witnesses remotely.

He didn't use all of his time at trial. There was ample process here. And this is how ballot access determinations in election cases are decided all the time. Okay, second question. Some of the rhetoric of your position.

I don't think it is your position, but some of the rhetoric of your position seems to suggest, unless the states can do this, no one can prevent insurrectionists from holding federal office. But obviously, Congress has enacted statutes, including ones still in effect. Section 23 80 of title 18 prohibits insurrection. It's a federal criminal statute. And if you're convicted of that, you are shall be disqualified from holding any office.

There you go. And so there is a federal statute on the books, but President Trump has not been charged with that. So what are we to make of that? Two things, your honor. Section 23 80 was initially enacted about sick.

He had the opportunity to call. Great question. Right? He wasn't prosecuted. Nobody charged him with anything.

And he goes on to say, essentially, that the states have other power the states can delegate to themselves. His main argument was, the states have plenary power to regulate their elections. And the judges did not buy into that at all. In fact, if the states do have all of the power to regulate those elections and just say who's on the bench or not, isn't that going to open the floodgates for this type of domino effect? Right?

This is the same thing we've been talking about here. One state will do it. It'll be a domino effect. It'll go down all over the country, and it will bedlam and madness and chaos. And again, they don't really care about that, because the left controls the trial lawyers, right, and the courts, many of them, and the secretaries of states, like they are in the infrastructure.

So if the states can regulate the elections and just disqualify Trump, they're going to win that battle. Right? That is a game that they can play. And if they have to have the american people actually vote for something, that is not a game they can win. So they're very unhappy about that, which is why they have to change the rules.

Fortunately, John Roberts seems like he gets it. If Colorado's position is upheld, surely there will be disqualification proceedings on the other side, and some of those will succeed. Some of them will have different standards of proof. Some of them will have different rules about evidence. Maybe the Senate report won't be accepted and others because it's hearsay.

Maybe it's beyond a reasonable doubt, whatever. In very quick order, I would expect, although my predictions have never been correct, I would expect that goodly number of states will say, whoever the democratic candidate is, you're off the ballot, and others for the republican candidate, you're off the ballot. And it'll come down to just a handful of states that are going to decide the presidential election. That's a pretty daunting consequence, certainly, your honor, the fact that there are potential frivolous applications of a constitutional provision isn't a reason. Well, no, hold on.

I mean, you might think they're frivolous, but probably the people who are bringing them may not think they're frivolous. Insurrection is a broad term, and if there's some debate about it, I suppose that will go into the decision. And then eventually what we would be deciding whether there was an insurrection when one president did something as opposed to when somebody else did something else. Yep, you nailed it, John Roberts. That's exactly what they're asking you to do.

They want the courts to handle all this stuff, and every state becomes its own, I guess, like little country where they just get to decide who's on the ballot and who's not. And the courts don't want to dig into that. Right. And I think this was a mistake that their side made when they were going through these arguments, they kept going back to the trial. They kept saying, well, in this case, Trump had ample opportunity, he had ample process and insurrection.

And it's not going to, we don't really care about that man. We care about the 14th amendment and about what this is going to do to the entire process throughout the country moving forward. Like, the court has to deal with the rest of the country. And they kept bringing it back to just Trump, right? They're so deluded and fixated on the man that they can't even think about the next consequences.

They can't see three inches in front of their face. It's going to cause the country to fall apart. And thank God we got the Supreme Court apparently has some sense now. Kitanji was also asking some amazing questions. So was Judge Kagan.

We're like, whoa, what the heck, the only one was Soto mayor, who is kind of a little bit waffly. We'll see if she comes around. But here's Keitanji. She says, you know, we are arguing about whether the 14th amendment applies to the president in the first place. Remember that Judge Sarah B.

Wallace in Colorado said that? It did not said, yes, Trump technically committed an insurrection. There was an insurrection. He engaged in. It said stuff, blah, blah, blah.

But the 14th amendment didn't apply to him because it says senators, representatives, other people, and it skips over president or vice president, and then it says all other civil offices. And they say that the president is included in the other civil offices, but it doesn't make sense because it feels like it's leaving, like, the biggest position out. And that's what we've been saying here for months. Read it. Look.

Felt like a broken record, for crying out loud. So about jumped out of our seat when we heard this one from rising again in the context of these sort of local elections as opposed to focusing on the presidency. Two points on that, Justice Jackson. First is that, as I discussed earlier, there isn't the same history of states regulating ballot access at this time. So ballot access rules to restrict presidential candidates wouldn't have existed.

They wouldn't have been raised one way or another. Right, but I'm not making a distinction between ballot access and anything else. Understood. But the more broad point I want to make is that what is very clear from the history is that the framers were concerned about charismatic rebels who might rise through the ranks up to and including the presidency of the United States. But then why didn't they put the word president in the very enumerated list in section three?

The thing that really is troubling to me is I totally understand your argument, but they were listing people that were barred and president is not there. And so I guess that just makes me worry that maybe they weren't focusing on the president. And, for example, the fact that electors of vice president and president are there suggests that really what they thought was, if we're worried about the charismatic person, we're going to bar insurrectionist electors, and therefore, that person is never going to rise. Bingo. Bingo.

That is exactly right from Judge Kitanji. Wow. Nailed it. Right? And that's exactly the proper analysis of that thing.

Yes, it's the electors. And you can see it in the text. Just follow the sequence of the writing. And she's a left judge, much right. And so we're going, okay, this is looking pretty good here.

Pretty nice. Because it's exactly right. And remember, she's a criminal defense attorney and we kind of live and die by those statues. Like, what does that say? Okay, he was not there.

This is here, this, he was not there. He was not doing that thing. So she's really combing through that. And if she joins in the majority in reversing this and she brings Kagan over, we'll see. Kagan's coming up next.

Let's see, came up in the debates in Congress over section three where reverty Johnson said, why haven't you included president and vice president in the language? And Senator Morrell responds, we have. Look at the language. Any office under the United States. Yes, but doesn't that at least suggest ambiguity?

And this sort of ties into Justice Kavanaugh's point. In other words, we had a person right there at the time saying what I'm saying. The language here doesn't seem to include president. Why is that? And so if there's an ambiguity, why would we construe it to, as Justice Kavanaugh pointed out, against democracy?

Well, Robert D. Johnson came back and agreed with that. Reading any office is clear. The constitution says about 20 times. No, I'm not going to that.

Let me just say. So your point is that there's no ambiguity with having a list and not having president in it, with having a history that suggests that they were really focused on local concerns in the south with this. All right. So good exchange there. If it meant president, it should say president.

It's pretty obvious. And it's not really debatable. It's about senators. They were thinking about presidents because they talked about the electors of the president and the vice president, but they didn't mention the president specifically. And even Judge Kagan is in on this.

Okay. Judge Kagan, also on the left, very on the left, says the question is about why should one state be allowed to dictate how the entire country goes because they disqualify somebody. And the idea is, remember, this is already happening. Colorado disqualified Trump. Chenna bellows from Maine use this legal concept called collateral estoppel issue preclusion to say that that is essentially binding on Maine because they don't want to relitigate everything, full faith and credit between the courts and all that stuff.

And so it transfers over to Maine and she just enters it, doesn't even need a hearing. So one state causes the domino effect and eventually the whole country now splits apart because of these people just trying to keep Trump off the ballot. Here's Judge Kagan, most boldly I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. In other words, this question of whether a former president is disqualified for insurrection. To be president, again, is, just say it.

It sounds awfully national to me. So whatever means there are to enforce it would suggest that they have to be federal national. Know, if you weren't from Colorado and you were from Wisconsin or you were from Michigan, and know, what the Michigan secretary of state did is going to make the difference between whether candidate a is elected or candidate b is mean. That seems quite extraordinary, doesn't it? Yes.

No, your honor, because ultimately, it's this court that's going to decide that question of federal constitutional eligibility and settle the issue for the nation. And certainly, it's not unusual that questions of national importance come up. Well, I suppose this court would be saying something along the lines of that a state has the power to do it, but I guess I was asking you to go a little bit further and saying, why should that be the right rule? Why should a single state have the ability to make this determination not only for their own citizens, but for the rest of the nation? Yeah, because article two gives them the power to appoint their own electors as they see fit.

But if they're going to use a federal constitutional qualification as a ballot access determinant, then it's creating a federal constitutional question that then this court decides. And other courts, other states, if this court affirms the decision below determining that President Trump is ineligible to be president, other states would still have to determine what effect that would have on their own state's law and state. I mean, if we affirmed and we said he was ineligible to be president, yes, maybe some states would, you know, we're going to keep him on the ballot anyway. But I mean, really, it's going to have, as Justice Kagan said, the effect of Colorado deciding. And it's true.

I just want to push back a little bit on, well, it's a national thing because this court will decide it. You say that we have to review Colorado's factual record with clear error as the standard of review. So we would be stuck. The first mover state here, Colorado, we're stuck with that record. Okay, so she's talking about what can the court do to the lower court's ruling?

You've heard of the phrase de novo, meaning the court can just look at the whole thing brand new, like with a fresh pair of glasses, like it's all fresh, or is that not the right standard. He's saying, oh, no, you can't. Like, we don't want you to reconsider. And look at the Colorado lower level court. You have to only review the record for clear error, meaning you can't change it unless you see something that was clearly erroneous, that was done by the court.

Otherwise, you got to let it stand. And so Amy Coney Barrett's saying, hey, if that's the case, then you say, we can decide this, but we can't decide it because you're saying the constitutional standard is clear error because the states can do whatever they want. So you just said we could fix it, but now we can't fix it. So what is it? And I don't want to get into the record.

I mean, maybe the record is great, but what if the record wasn't, I mean, what if it wasn't a fulsome record? What if the hearsay rules are one offs? Or what if this is just made by the secretary of state without much process at all? How do we review those factual findings? Why should clear error review apply?

And doesn't that just kind of buckle back into this point that Justice Kagan was know that we made with Mr. Mitchell, too, that it just doesn't seem like a state call? Three points, your honor. The first is that ordinarily, of course, this court reviews factual findings for clear error. But President Trump made the point in his reply brief that sometimes on constitutional questions that require a uniform resolution, this court can do something more like a Bose corp.

Style independent review of the factual record. And we would have no objection to that, given that the record here really, the facts that are disputed here are incredibly narrow. The essence of our case is President Trump's own statements that he made in public view for all to see. But then that's saying that in this context, which is very high stakes, if we review the facts essentially de novo, you want us all to just watch the video of the ellipse and then make a decision without any deference to or guidance from lower court fact finding? That's unusual.

Ultimately, President Trump himself urges this court to decide the merits of his eligibility on the factual record here at page two of his brief. He's never, at any point in this proceeding, suggested there was something else that needed to be in the factual record, any other witnesses that he wanted to call to present his case. And again, the essence of our case is his own statements, and in particular, his own videotaped statements on the ellipse. A lot of this was, I think, a mistake because the court is not going to want to do this for every case that lands on their desk. And they're going to want to try to figure out a framework to let the lower level courts.

Okay, if they're saying, okay, yeah, actually states can remove people from the ballot, what are the rules? How does it all work? Like, we know, age 35, you're not on there. Not a natural. Okay, not on there.

Got it. Third term, not on there. But how does it work for insurrection? And he's saying, well, kind of the courts can decide. And then he goes back to Trump's case.

But they're not asking about Trump's case. They're asking about the rules to decide whether or not they should even do something like this in the first place. And he just goes right back to Trump. Mr. Murray, just to circle back to, I'm sorry to interrupt, but yeah, Gordon cut him off.

He cut him off. Left it. Wanted to circle back to where Justice Kagan was. Do you agree that the state's powers here, over its ballot for a federal officer election, have to come from some constitutional authority? Members of this court have disagreed about that.

I'm asking you, the majority of this court has said that those powers come from article two, but we think that the result is the same whether the court locates it in article two or in a reserve power under the 10th amendment. But you accept that this court has held, you're not contesting this or asking us to revisit that decision in Thornton or term limits or whatever you want to call it, that it has to come from some federal constitutional authority. All right, so digging it back into, he says the state has plenary power to just basically run however they want, right, and qualify people or disqualify people. So it was not good for their side. It was good for America, because this was logical and reasonable from the very beginning.

This idea that a single state could just declare an insurrection with a five day trial with no process, really at all, and then throw them off the ballot and that would stand was insane. But a lot of people were saying that this was a great way to save american democracy. A lot of history professors, a lot of MSNBC contributors, all these people all over the mainstream media, all saying this is a historic case of importance to save America, democracy and all stuff, and they got obliterated, right. Their arguments are bad. Their logic is bad.

They are blinded by their demented tds. And here is what they sounded like on MSNBC. Andrew, let me ask you first, because it seemed to us, in listening to this so closely for the last 2 hours, 19 minutes or so that there was broad agreement across the usual political division lines, that there was a lot of ambiguity in this process, and that ambiguity would favor keeping the candidate, Donald Trump, on the ballot. I agree with you. My takeaway from this is you were counting the votes.

Remember, Justice O'Connor famously said when she was asked, what's it like to be on the Supreme Court? It's about counting to five here. There is clearly, I think, five, definitely five, not nine votes that are going to reverse this case. Point that you made about ambiguity was raised by various justices, meaning that if it's not clear, isn't it shouldn't sort of favor having somebody being allowed to run and thus our ability to vote for that person. There was a lot of concern about having a state have the power to interfere with a federal election.

It's not a state interfering with a state election. Should they really be able to weigh in on this? And then there was an interesting across, as your point, across different justices, Katanji Jackson, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, who is very active in this oral argument, talking about the history of this amendment, talking about how it really dealt with the confederacy and the concern about Confederates burrowing in to confederate states and sort of influencing federal elections. All right, so they're all pretty muted these days. Yeah, a lot of the know, they're actually calling it accurately on the reaction there.

But here is another bad reaction from MSNBC. This was a short one from Neil cat, y'all. And here is what that looks like from MSNBC. Here's a short one. He says, yeah, it's pretty bad.

I've watched over 400 Supreme Court arguments. I've done 50 myself. I would tell you this argument did not go well for the Trump challengers, and that's to put it mildly. I probably have some other adjectives that I won't say on. Oh, he mad, isn't he?

He mad. So, yeah, he probably has some other adjectives that he doesn't want to split in there. So we know what you're feeling, man. We know. I mean, I don't empathize with you, but it looks like you're pretty upset.

We can see that. So not happy with what happened there. Other adjectives for how it worked. Here's Jenna Griswold, who was walking out of court. This came over from Laura Loomer on X at Laura Loomer.

She says that somebody was there. They were asking Jenna Griswold about her funding from George Soros, secretary of State Griswold how much did Soros pay you to kick Trump off the ballot? Oh, it's crazy eyes. Why do you take Soros donations? How much did Soros pay you?

She didn't look like that. That was the look of death right there. Did you see that look of death right there? I'm going to have you murdered and your whole family. Look at those eyes, man.

She will do it. She'll do it. If Trump wins, someone better keep an eye on her. Okay? When Trump wins, someone better keep a tab on.

Ugh. I can feel her, like, putting the face paint on, you know what I'm saying? Like the Rambo hat on, like the face paint. Listening to something like, in a cabin in the woods. Know, that could go bad like that.

I can just envision it now. Here's Donald Trump. Trump came out, he had some reaction to this. He spoke immediately after the Supreme Court had their oral arguments. He said he listened in.

Let's listen to the former president. Had a good day in court. Let's see. I don't even know if we have anymore. I'm not sure that we even have a republican candidate, somebody running, but not making any impact.

So, as you know, we won Iowa, we won New Hampshire in records, each one a record. We think we're going to do very well. I'm heading out right now to Nevada for the caucus and the caucuses, and I think we're going to do very well there. All polls indicate we're in the 90s, maybe more than the 90s. We certainly did well in a primary that didn't matter.

They voted very nicely, and we have tremendous support from the people of our country. They hate what's happening at the border. They hate what's happening just generally. We're not a respected country anymore. We're laughed at all over the world.

They're laughing at it and they hate what's happening. They hate seeing it. They love our country. They want it to come back, and we're going to do that. If you think about it, there's an airplane now.

Could there be anything else? I wonder if there's like a boat horn that's going to be coming up in this audio. Had the results of the election different, you wouldn't have the ukrainian situation with Russia. You would not have had an attack on Israel, which was so horrible. You would not have had inflation.

You wouldn't have China talking about Taiwan. You wouldn't have any of the problems that we have today. Iran was broke when I left. They had no money to give to Hamas they had no money to give to Hezbollah. They have 200 billion plus, as you probably know, people don't like to admit it.

They certainly control Iraq. And Iraq has another 300 billion, a very rich group of countries. And, you know, Iraq should have never happened. It was a balance against Iran and we blew out the balance. And now Iran has essentially Iraq.

And Iraq doesn't like saying that, but that's the way it is. It's a shame. The world is in tremendous danger. We're in danger of possibly a world war three. And we have a man who's absolutely every day the worst president in the history of our country, can't put two sentences together.

He's not going to be able to negotiate with Putin or Xi, Kim Jong un, North Korea, not going to be able to negotiate with anybody. All he knows how to do is drop bombs all over the place, meaningless bombs, except they kill a lot of people, cost a lot of money. Every time you see a bomb, it's another million dollars, and it actually sets us back. We have peace through strength. This should not be happening.

The Middle east is blowing up. A lot of people are being killed, and it's so unnecessary. All right, Mr. President, thank you for that. So a good day in the Supreme Court for Donald Trump, for America.

As the justices were calling out the other side for their insanity, I mean, there's absolutely a real possibility that we have a nine to zero opinion coming out, and that would be the right call. That is something that I think would show uniformity amongst the court. It would show that this type of election litigation is totally inappropriate. And I think that there might be some good carryover on this, honestly, for the immunity case. Now, you can read this both ways.

This morning on our locals at watchingthewatchers locals.com, a great question came up, which was about what happens if the Supreme Court is trying to split the baby, right? Trying to say, we're going to give Trump a 90 on this one, but we're going to then rule against him on immunity or something else. Right. To allow those prosecutions to go forward, say we'll put him on the ballot, but the criminal prosecutions can go forward. And there is some politics in the Supreme Court, obviously, because a lot of the Supreme Court's power, as we talked about this morning, comes from its legitimacy, from its credibility.

And if it doesn't have any of that, it doesn't have any power. So if they do that, if they make that decision to split that, maybe that's a political decision, that is something that can happen. But the alternative is that what the court is doing is anchoring in drawing a line in the sand to say that there is no appropriate way to allow the states to attack the executive. Right. The states don't get to just decide that a president can be shackled.

It's a federalism issue. Right. A state's rights versus a federalism issue. And so if the states can't unilaterally remove themselves, can the states unilaterally prosecute a president, which might ultimately lead to consequences that might jeopardize the national election. Right.

In other words, prosecutions are being used as swords to go attack your political opponents. And that is a key reason why we have immunity in the first place to prevent all of that. Right? So if the judges are inclined to say, we want to protect the power of the presidency against the state attacks, if they're inclined to do that here, there might be some basis that they do that in the immunity case. Right.

Kind of bodes well that they're thinking this way now. It's Donald Trump. We know that they're all going to be insurrection fever there. And Trump introduces a whole new set of variables. So we'll see how the immunity case goes.

But I think this, especially if it's a 90 opinion, as it sounds like it might be, I think this is voting well for the power of the presidency, which is really what we're talking about. Can states disqualify either the candidate for that office or essentially the person in that office by charging them with crimes that they just decide on their own are criminal without any real federal oversight of know, can RICO, Fanny or Alvin Bragg just decide to do those things? And then similarly, can Jack Smith do that? So we're going to be here and continuing to cover all of this. This was a historic day, my friends.

You don't often hear election cases like this that are going to be this consequential for the whole country. And so we're grateful that we got to spend that time together with you here today. And there's going to be a lot more on this, right? There's going to be a ruling. We'll read it here, cover it here.

So be sure that you're subscribed. And I appreciate you hitting that, like, button and sharing the show with a friend or family member. A great way to share the show is to go to robertgovea.com, sign up for our daily newsletter that's right there. And then when the emails come in, you can just forward them to everyone you've ever met. In your entire life and they'll love you for it.

So sign up for the newsletter robertgovea.com. Don't forget to check out watchourlodge.com. We've got some great February events there. They are free and they're free to join. And then they're up live for 48 hours before they go behind the wall.

And so we'll look forward to seeing you there. Check it out, watchourlodge.com and we'll see you back here on the next funny.

Previous Blog Posts:

View me!

CNN anchor shocked after black voter says he can’t guarantee he will vote for Biden – 11-02-2023

CNN anchor shocked after black voter says he can't guarantee he will vote for Biden - 11-02-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

In Milwaukee, the black community's vote is pivotal for statewide elections, influencing the broader national political landscape. President Biden's last visit in August highlighted a green energy initiative, with infrastructure funds being used to rejuvenate industrial sites, a move seen as beneficial for black America. However, there's concern over the lack of mention of police accountability and criminal justice reform in early campaign ads targeting black voters. The black voter turnout, which soared during Obama's presidency, declined in 2016 and remained flat in 2020. When asked to grade Biden's impact, a voter gave a score of four, indicating dissatisfaction yet acknowledging the lack of better alternatives, with Trump being the likely opposition.

Joanna Brooks, a yoga studio owner, expresses the sentiment that black voters are often overlooked by the Democratic Party, yet she feels the urgency to support the party due to Republican stances on abortion and voting rights. Eric Jones, another local, is skeptical that the dislike for Trump will be enough to increase black voter turnout. He emphasizes the need for tangible opportunities and jobs to secure votes.

The mood in Milwaukee is tense, with many expressing disappointment in Biden's presidency. A young activist is unsure of his vote, reflecting a broader sense of disaffection among voters. The state's narrow vote margins in previous elections underscore the significance of every vote. There's a call for more visibility from Biden and Vice President Harris, with the community seeking acknowledgment and engagement.

The report concludes with a young black man's uncertainty about voting, a sentiment that captures the broader disillusionment with the current political offerings. This uncertainty is juxtaposed with the anticipation of the October jobs report and the ongoing humanitarian crises, such as the situation in Gaza, which also demand attention from the administration.

#Milwaukee #BlackVoters #Elections #Biden #Infrastructure #PoliceReform #Justice #Obama #Turnout #Trump #DemocraticParty #AbortionRights #VotingRights #CivilRights #Activism #Jobs #Visibility #Harris #Disaffection #Engagement #CampaignAds #CommunityImpact #PoliticalLandscape #GreenEnergy #IndustrialRevival #VoterGrade #RepublicanOpposition #YouthActivism #EconomicConcerns #JobsReport #GazaCrisis #HumanitarianAid #SeniorCare #OnlineSecurity #BathroomRemodel

Key Takeaways:

Milwaukee's black community is a decisive factor in elections.
President Biden's impact on the community is perceived as minimal.
There's a notable concern over the lack of focus on police reform.
Voter turnout has not recovered since the Obama years.
The community feels taken for granted by the Democratic Party.
Visibility and engagement from Biden and Harris are strongly desired.
The potential of Trump as an opponent may not be enough to motivate voters.
The political mood in Milwaukee is one of disappointment and disaffection.

Predictions:

If the current political climate persists, Biden may face significant challenges in the upcoming election.
The black voter turnout in Milwaukee could be the deciding factor in the state's election results.
The community's demand for engagement may lead to increased visibility efforts from Democratic leaders.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

CNN anchor shocked after black voter says he can't guarantee he will vote for Biden - 11-02-2023

There's no way to win a statewide election that doesn't run through the black community. What happens in Milwaukee can impact the rest of the state, which ultimately can impact the rest of the country. No pressure. The President was last here in August for a green energy event, and this old industrial site is being cleaned up with Biden infrastructure money putting in the work for black America. But early spending on radio and TV ads targeting black voters is proof the campaign sees the problem.

Those ads don't mention one issue critical here. People are wondering, what is he doing in terms of police accountability and criminal justice reform? Lang also says the president better show up more. People always want to see people actually paying attention, and sometimes that means being able to physically be here and engage. Black.

Turnout soared here in the Obama years, but it dropped in 2016 and was flat in 2020. On a scale of one to ten, how would you grade the Joe Biden presidency in terms of its impact on your life and your community? A four. A four? Yeah.

And I love Joe DeVette. Baker, though, sees a reason for optimism. The alternative is the man whose name I try not to say. Well, I'll say it as we sit here today. The likely alternative is Donald Trump, right?

Would that be enough to motivate people, even if maybe they're a little on Biden? I think so. Joanna Brooks is one such voter. She owns a yoga studio just across the Milwaukee line in Glendale. All right, shaw like many we met in the city, brooks says black voters get taken for granted.

Black people in general, I think, tend to be pretty loyal to the Democratic Party. And sometimes I wonder, just based on how that party has performed thus far for people of color, if we should continue to be. But Brooks says that accountability exercise must wait until after 2024 because of constant Republican attacks on abortion rights and voting rights. I grew up almost certain that my rights were guaranteed. I took it for granted.

And now, as I sit and watch the work of so many black folks during the civil rights movement, so many women who fought for women's rights, when I see all of their work slowly being undone, that was a wake up call for me. For sure. You have to fight. Eric Jones is no Trump fan, but he thinks it's foolish to bet on Trump motivating black turnout. I get people saying they're not going to vote.

That's my fear that if they see those two and they're going to say, screw it, we're damned anyway. We met Jones at the fifth anniversary of the Bronzeville collective. Several local artists sell their goods here. It is a source of smiles and hope in a community often defined by poverty and a high incarceration rate. When the factories and the manufacturing left, jobs left.

When jobs leave and opportunities leave, then you have certain things that are domino effects, right. Jones says the president should stop by and learn a lesson. You bring opportunities, you bring jobs, you get votes, plain and simple. For the President, it is the mood a year from now that matters most. But the mood today is bleak.

If you're Joe Biden, then you want to be reelected. He'd have a problem today, right? Yes, he will. He'll have a big problem. Johnson's work could well help the president.

But listen, if it were just Biden and Trump, who would you vote for?

That's just a tough one. A young man who says the country needs big change, determined to boost Milwaukee's black turnout, yet not sure who gets his vote. And just stunning that young man there, I don't know who I'm going to vote for. A young black man in Milwaukee who's actually part of this activist community. Then you have the older black women answering the door say, yeah, people died for my right to vote, but I'm not sure I'm going to vote because I'm so disaffected and disenchanted and it matters.

There's a year to fix it. But remember, two times in a row, wisconsin alone, big battleground state decided by about 20,000 votes. So it doesn't take many people staying home or going the other way to flip the state. Do they recognize it's as big a problem as it is privately? Some of them do.

Others think, put Trump on the ballot and that's going to turn everybody out or the president will get out. There more. An interesting thing when you see Republicans beating up on the vice president all the time, people in that community were like, where are you? Please come. Please visit.

They're proud to have a black woman as the vice president. Part of it is the issues. People are in a funk from COVID in a funk from inflation. It's not all about Biden, but part of it is just visibility. They want to see him.

They want him to come and take their questions and they want to see her. But so far, not much. My jaw literally dropped the end of that piece when he didn't say who was going to. A 21 year old young black man in the activist community doesn't know because he looks at Washington and says, what are they doing that's relevant to my life? Nothing important work, important piece.

Really appreciate it, John. Thank you. The October jobs report will be released just about an hour from now. What it will show us about the state of the economy and President Biden facing mounting pressure at home to deal with humanitarian crises in Gaza. Now 13 Democrats in the Senate calling for a, quote, short term cessation of hostilities to allow for more aid.

Chris Murphy is one of those 13 senators key foreign policy voice. He's going to join us next.

Without a place for Mom, I don't know how I would have found the perfect senior care not just once, but twice. When mom needed help at home, our advisor helped us find the best home care. As Mom's care needs changed, our advisor understood what she needed once again guiding us to the perfect Senior Living community. I'm so grateful that Mom's in such a warm, welcoming place. For free senior Living advice go to a placeformom.com shopping online comes with digital threats.

So turn on NordVPN, steer clear of phishing websites and encrypt your online traffic. Get the deal now. Hi. It's Christina again. I'm here to tell you about an all new special offer from my friends at Jacuzzi Bathroom Model that you don't want to miss.

You already know. Jacuzzi has been making water feel great for more than 65 years. And now they're bringing you this special TV offer. We're waiving all installation costs and postponing all payments for one year. Jacuzzi Bathroom Model has a design you'll love at a price you can afford.

And best of all, they can install it in as little as one day with no stress and no mess. Are you ready to see your new shower? Here it is. It's fabulous. Taking a shower had gone from being a joy to being burden.

I was afraid I would fall. I called and just one day I had a shower I could feel safe in. No matter your situation, Jacuzzi Bathroomodel has a solution for you from a safer, easy entry shower with features like grab bars and a custom seat to keep you feeling comfortable and independent at home to.

View me!

5 Key Takeaways from the Man in America Interview with Cliff High – 09-14-2023

5 Key Takeaways from the Man in America Interview with Cliff High - 09-14-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

Seth Holhouse, the host of "Man in America," interviews Cliff High, a brilliant independent thinker. They discuss the constructed reality around us and the importance of questioning it. The conversation delves into topics like outer space, the moon, and the future, including the 2024 outlook, Trump's plans, the role of the military, and the banking system. Cliff introduces the concept of the "Great Awakening," suggesting that increased emanations from the galactic center are causing a global awakening. The deep state, or the Khazarian mafia, is described as being desperate due to this awakening. Cliff predicts a significant event that will further enhance the Great Awakening. He uses the analogy of building and release tension to describe the emotional state of the masses. The deep state has been managing this balance to maintain control. However, an upcoming event, whether orchestrated by the deep state or not, will disrupt this balance, leading to a state of "hyper novelty." This event will be so significant that society won't revert to its previous state. Cliff suggests that the deep state might not be the ultimate power, hinting at a greater force behind them.

#ManInAmerica #SethHolhouse #CliffHigh #GreatAwakening #DeepState #KhazarianMafia #2024Outlook #Trump #Military #BankingSystem #GalacticCenter #EmotionalTension #HyperNovelty #Reality #Questioning #OuterSpace #Moon #Future #GlobalConsciousness #Balance #Control #Society #Event #Prediction #Change

5 Key Takeaways from the Man in America Interview with Cliff High - 09-14-2023

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holhouse. So today I have one of my favorite people to talk to, and not because I agree with everything he says, but because he's such an independent and I think pretty brilliant thinker. And that's cliff high. Now you could say that maybe he's bordering on that range of kind of mad genius.

And I would agree with that. I think it's a good thing because what it means that he's questioning the fundamental things that we think to be true in our reality. And when you look back at how much of our so called reality has been constructed as a cage around us, I think that questioning the fundamentals of what we think to be true is a really good thing. So actually, I just finished this interview with Cliff. I'm doing the intro afterwards.

We talked for about an hour and a half. It's a really engaging conversation. We go into some crazy topics. I mean, of course, we go into a lot of stuff about outer space and the moon in the middle of the discussion, which is great. But we talk a lot about what's coming next.

What's 2024 look like? What's trump's plan? Is the military involved? Is the whole military compromised? Does Trump still have a lot of say?

Are they going to be involved in the elections? There's a really interesting chunk that we get into with that towards the end. We also get into the banking system. What's going on with the banking system? What does he expect to see happening in addition to that precious metals bitcoin?

So, as you would expect, it's an incredibly engaging discussion with Cliff. And actually the first probably 20 minutes to 30 minutes I found to be so interesting because we're talking about this measurable way of looking at the great awakening. And it's going to blow your mind the way this guy thinks. So I hope you enjoy this interview. Before we get started, we got a few quick announcements.

For one, we are giving away silver. So for all the man in America family, we're giving away 5oz of pure silver every Friday. So if you want to enter to win that 5oz of pure silver, it's going to be five generic rounds, buffalo rounds, just go to Silverseth.com or go to Slash Win. So if silverstheth doesn't work on your browser, it's maninamerica.com Win. You enter your name and your email once and you're automatically entered in every Friday.

Again for the Friday drawing of the 5oz of free silver. Also, every show I do is also done as a podcast. So if you want to listen instead of watch, just go to your favorite podcast app and search for man in America and you'll find me there. All right, folks, enjoy this mind bending and interesting conversation with Cliff High. But Cliff, it is great to have you back on.

It was such an interesting interview the first time around and I've got so many questions and I think there's a lot to talk about. So thanks again for being here. Sure, no worries at all. Yes, I've got a whole list of questions here, so I'd say one of the big ones I want to first jump into know we're heading into the election year. It feels like the deep state, the cabal, that they're at a very desperate place, that a lot of the Americans that may have voted for Joe Biden before now have woken up.

They're seeing the problems of the current administration everywhere. They're questioning the elections. What do you see happening? And what are some of your data sets saying as we're going into, say, the next, say, three, six months into the election year, next year? What do you expect to unfold during this period?

I don't have much in the way of expectations, but I have some stuff out of my data that seems to describe 2024. And I'm not going to call it an election year for various different reasons.

We're at war now. We've been at war basically for I mean, if you want to think about it the way I do it, we've been at war for about 6000 years with these same Khazarian people that are trying to take over the planet. As you are quite correct, the Deep State, this Khazarian mafia, is very desperate at the moment, okay? They are escalating because the Great Awakening is happening. They have within their group, some small number of them, that recognize that this is a phenomenon that is beyond their control.

It has to do actually, factually, with increased emanations from the galactic center waking us all up. And the Great Awakening is not a misnomer, okay? And there's nothing that Khazarians can do about this, including slaughtering people. But they're starting to do that, okay? So the deep state is at war with us.

What I do expect is that that war in this next six months will break out into the open, into the normie mines in a sharp, very sharp way, and I'll explain that in a second such that it will occupy all of the places that are now occupied by the unraveling of the political illusion. Okay? So all of those people that are worried about the Biden regime or Obama, or they're coming to terms with the fact that Obama is gay and Michelle is a guy and they rented those kids and all of this other stuff, all of those people will be jolted into an awareness of a war. And they will have to try and cope in sort of a rush, okay? Because they're going to jump and leap right out of the normie world of politics in a degrading America to a much greater view of what's going on.

And they will understand that we're in World War II and World War II is being fought with dues. And that's the news right that it's not your papa's World War II. It's not that not going back. We're going forward into this new functioning and the deep state is the enemy. It's not nation state versus nation state.

This is going to be very difficult for people to wrap their heads around. So yes, perhaps the plunger on Maui was pulled or a button was pushed by a guy in China who is a CCP fellow. But it doesn't mean that China the nation state, nor China the people attacked Maui, okay? It means that an arm of the deep state within the CCP attacked Maui on the orders of the deep state. We're going to have an event of some form or a series of events of some form.

So I'm connected with remote viewers, the best remote viewers on the planet, bar none. The only remote viewers that might be better are ones we don't know about because they're hidden so deep. Okay? I'm not going to say what those remote viewers have been telling me because I have not been given permission. They have to release this information on their own.

What I will say is that they are echoing what my numbers are showing. Okay? So I have this thing called building tension value. And I have a release tension value. And this is building emotional tension.

And this is release of emotional tension. The words can be the same, the descriptors can be the same, but all the adjectives would be different and the emotional aspect of it would be different. And in building tension, it's like you're trying to describe your anxiety or you're crunching in on yourself in some aspect relative to something that's pushing on you from the outside. In release language, you're jumping up and down and releasing all that emotion. These two, whatever the value of them, the difference has a finite range and it ranges from three point something up to 5.85.

5.85 is our maximum. Now that's our maximum delta between release and building tension. And it fluctuates every single time I do these runs. It fluctuates some degree. Sometimes building tension is larger.

Sometimes release tension is larger. Since 2001, building tension has had a tendency to dominate since 2001. Now we are in a situation where we have this, that we have two sets of values. And now the delta between these is 81.86,958,695. Okay?

So this is 13 times my maximum usual standard deviation range 13 times in a standard way. Standard deviations work. A single standard deviation is something that an engineer might pay attention to, especially in bridges and that kind of thing. Two times standard deviation is something that an engineer would want to pay attention to. In energy mechanics, it means your engine is not working the way it should.

That kind of thing. Three times standard deviation in anything, any aspect of engineering is a catastrophe. All right? We're at 13 times that now and it's dominating with release tension. All right?

So the last time we had a significant dominant release language event was 2001. Okay, so that was the 911 attack. Everybody released for months afterwards. It was just dominating with release of emotional tension. Even at that point, it was less than the standard deviation range.

Right? So now we're 13 times higher. So the remote viewers are echoing what I'm seeing.

They have different methods, different characterizations of what's going on. But in Maine they would echo that something is going to occur. It's going to occur in the near or immediate timeframe, and it's going to be dominated by release language. So Maui was dominated by release language up to the point that the Feds came in and started putting up the barriers and now everything's all tension. Everybody's getting all tense about it, they're getting angry and so forth in a way that they didn't get angry with that attack.

You can actually see the language in the various articles. Go back and read something about the event and everybody's outpouring all of their grief, et cetera, et cetera. And now it's all anger about the way everybody's being treated. Okay, so the Feds came in and turned. Sure.

So I have to make sure I'm tracking this right. So basically it's a simple way of me understanding it. It's almost as if the Cabal has to maintain a balance of release and the building of this tension. And so the we, the people, the average Americans or the average people on
Earth, it's like they'll push us a little bit that they're monitoring this, our tension comes up, then we can relieve that tension just to feel like, okay, it's okay again, that's how they get us to get distracted back with the circus. So that's how they keep it level.

We get really pissed off and then we feel like we accomplish something. It's like, oh, well, Durham did this. And it's like, okay, let's calm back down. But what's happening right now, it's almost like when you watch a trailer being pulled behind a truck that starts swaying, it gets to a certain point where it starts whipping so violently that the only thing that can happen is a catastrophe. So is that kind of what's happening?

Okay, correct. Okay. So I don't know how much control the Cabal actually exercises over the building intention. I don't know that they consider it this way, but in fundamental effect, they manage it this way. Right.

They don't want enough people to ever wake up that the Khazarian mafia can be seen behind all of the illusion they've put out. Right? And so we have that now. The illusion is breaking down. The ADL is under attack.

That's one of their primary enforcers. Right? So all of these things are breaking down for them as it is breaking down. If they used to have control over this all right, so we could look at it two ways. We could look at that.

We're going to have a breakout emotional event that they won't be able to control that will further enhance our Great Awakening, right? And that that event is not necessarily initiated by them. All right? Or we could look at it at the opposite, that we're going to have a breakout event. They won't be able to control the aftermath of it because too many people will be awake to what's going on, but they created it.

Okay, so basically what you were describing, maintaining the balance here is a method of keeping us under control. Dampening it down, right? Dampen down the hunger with a little bit now and put it off a little bit later. That kind of a thing which we've been under for hundreds of years. Okay?

So another way to look at it is that they're so desperate that they must do a major attack in order to cause as much damage and as much chaos as possible in order that they may assert control in the midst of that chaos, which is what they do. They have a tendency to create the 911 incident, right? So if we looked at the attack on the towers in terms of its release language, we are looking at something that's going to have 13 times more release language that will manifest both in spiking values immediately, but also in duration. It'll have to go on for a long time in order for this to work its way out of all the people. This is going to exacerbate the deep state's worries and problems relative to the Great Awakening, because the longer we're in this upset state, in this upset state, they don't have control.

Right. What they work on is basically fracturing your concentration and allowing the brain chemicals to calm down, and as you're calming down, then they try and get you back in the control by placing those things in front of you to lead you. Right? They don't usually come along and put a cattle prod in your back and push you because that exacerbates the disruption within your mental state. It's a very delicate balance for them to do their hypnosis and keep the illusion.

This is basically saying that there's going to be some event, whether they create it or not, that's going to escalate so far that we won't be going back. Okay, so this is why I have been saying that we're approaching a point of hyper novelty because we'll cross over a threshold where it will not be possible for us to go back to these levels or that old illusion anymore. So there is reason to suspect that World War Three, however it is characterized nation state versus nation state or deep state versus global population, other than Russia and a few other places that are awake and not in their control. However we characterize that, we're going to get to a point where there's going to be an opening of this idea that the deep state exists independent of the nation states and is at war with the people, I think it will come out because the deep state will try and gen up a nation state war. It's not going to work.

But in the process of doing that, they're going to waken up a lot more of the normal population by basically having such a huge shock to their system that all their mind is cleansed. Right? So most people, I don't know how many people could actually remember, but you wake up one morning and then I was on the west coast here and you hear about the attacks on 911. Right? From that moment on, my thinking was altered, it never went back.

Then you see all of the problems that generate the fact that they had this massive thousands of pages of law ready to enact within a week. So, you know, it's all a put up job. Yada yada, yada. Right? And so your thinking never goes back to the way it was and we're approaching something like that.

Will it be a directed energy weapon attack on Colorado or Florida or Wyoming perhaps?

Something too visible to ignore. People in Turkey right after Maui were struck by energy weapons, they filmed the energy weapons coming down and starting the brush fires in their area. So this is part of the deep state war against the population of Earth. Now, I'm a little on the woo side, so I think there's something on the other side of the deep state. I don't think the deep state is their own masters.

Right. I think there's a lot of the people in the deep state that know what I know about this and don't want to go anywhere near this, but are not able to change events such that they could back off of this because there's something on the other side that's driving them. So there are certain things that are popping out in reality that suggest that there are support in our factual reality for some kind of an event coming along this way. So it's subtle, you'd have to really understand the data and the way I'm looking at it. But some of these supporting more subtle effects are hugely long term in the way in which they will manifest and the effects they will have.

Got a quick message for you. So folks, thank goodness inflation is going down. Thank you Biden. But wait, if inflation is going down, then why are food prices going up, energy prices going up and gas prices going up? Well, because they're lying to us.

Imagine that. You see, right now the real rate of inflation is closer to 25%, not the 5% the White House wants you to believe. You can see this with your own eyes and your own wallet. What this means is that if you had $100,000 in your savings account just one year ago, today it's only worth about $75,000 in terms of your actual buying power. Your money is losing value by the day.

If you went back to 1920 and you had a $20 bill or a 1oz gold coin, you could walk into a men's clothing store and buy an entire suit, jacket, shoes, pants, belt, everything. But think about it. What would a $20 bill buy you today? Maybe some socks, but an ounce of gold will still buy you that same suit. And this is why I believe that now more than ever, it's a good time to consider transferring at least a portion of your wealth into physical gold and silver.

Real world assets have stood the test of time, and for this, I'm confident in recommending dr. Kirk Elliott. So, Kirk has two PhDs and is an incredible Christian patriot who's dedicated to helping you break free from the trap of inflation. You can buy gold and silver directly, even in small amounts, or you can transfer your IRA into physical gold and silver with zero taxes or penalties. So, Kirk is who I use.

He's who my family and my friends use, and honestly, he's someone I trust completely. And when it comes to your wealth, you need someone that you can trust. So to learn more, open up a new tab right now and go to goldwithseth.com or call 720-605-3900 to speak to a real person. Right now, kirk LA's team will answer all of your questions and take care of you every step of the way. So, right now, they're trying to work out the deep state, and the individuals involved are trying to work out a face saving mechanism for shutting down CERN, for shutting down the large Hadron collider.

Okay? That massive, massive, massive investment. More copper in that thing than in any dam on the planet, okay? There's more copper there than any of the dams in our country, probably more than all of the dams in our country in terms of the generators and stuff, and they're shutting it down because it's useless. It took particle physics as far as it could go, and it failed, and people are drifting away.

Okay, so a bad sign for science when your scientists are not re upping on their own and you got to go on out and try and keep recruiting them to come back into your operation. Whatever they were attempting to achieve, they failed with that. The fact that we're looking at such a large thing being shut down and the first hints of the emotional problems that these guys are getting into in that shutdown process because they can't just everybody walk away and lock the door, right? They've got to decommission this thing. It's got to be a public kind of a deal.

It's got to upend their whole grasp on physics and science because they took science to this huge pinnacle and spent more on a single science project than anything ever in our history. And it failed. And it was a failure from the beginning. If you looked at things the appropriate way, you would see this. And in spite of them having hidden motivations, even all their hidden motivations failed.

And that's caused them some real consternation so we could be facile and see things at a surface level and say, oh, the Deep state's attempt to create a portal for demons
with the Large Hadron Collider for demons to come in and help them failed. Okay? And so there probably will be people that have that view, right? Like, I don't know particular kind of mentician in people that would think that this was the case, but it's true that it failed. I don't know that they were attempting to bring in demons.

I know that there were all these other ancillary projects for the Large Hadron Collider that were never mentioned except in the back quarters kind of thing. But I know that that failure, as upsetting as it is to the mainstream scientists that are on the front side of it, is much more upsetting to the whackadoodle deep state scientists on the back side of things. And it's caused a huge problem with their grasp of reality, really, because things they were attempting to do, whatever they were basically that failure came back and said, no, you people are totally wrong in your view of how reality works. And that has really shocked them. So we're going to see all different kinds of things here.

We've got major monetary collapses going on in the background that are significantly huge. So this time next year, will we be able to have an election in the United States? I do not believe we would be able to have any kind of an election that the Biden regime would be planning on. That is to say Dominion Machines, any of that kind of stuff. I don't think any of that's going to happen because they won't be able to pay for it.

I think Dominion itself will be bankrupt and no one working for them this time next year. Okay, so by the time we get into September next year, a lot of these very large firms will be 100% defunct because they rely basically on skimmed illegal money. So the Federal Reserve says they create a billion dollars. Well, they farm out 1 billion without telling us to all their buddies. But the fact that they've been doing that for so long and all of a sudden it comes to a stop.

All of these firms that are counting on that money being farmed out to them, as well as the fact that the money doesn't purchase what it should anyway, are in a world of hurt. And it's the bribery level that's going to be bringing down a lot of these very shaky institutions that basically rely on that hidden money to hoax up the books and get through year to year to year. And we're seeing it now. So a year from now, I don't think we'll have an ordinary election. I could see us having an election that was being supervised by some other authority like the US.

Military, right? I could see us having an election that was being supervised in a way that didn't rely on commercial products like Dominion and all of that sort of thing. And I'm saying that because the monetary system is going to be having such huge amounts of trouble between now and then. And we have this coming up, whatever this release language event is, right? So if we postulated it know a direct energy weapon attack on the Denver airport, right?

There's reasons to do that, to get at the stuff that's underneath the airport. Maybe that would be the deep state doing it, one part of the deep state against another part. Maybe it would be anti deep state people doing it. Who the hell knows, right? Because we're not being clued in as to who the participants are in this war.

But it will be something on that order where people will be able to tune in on the internet, probably even on regular TV and see particle beam weapons coming down, beating the absolute crap out of the Denver airport until it's just a smoking hole in the ground. That's what it's going to take to get these kind of numbers. And at that level, what's our response as a nation and so on and so on. Now I've got data sets that say that this coincidental, okay? So coincidental to this, all right, not as a direct outgrowth and not as a supporting feature, but coincidental to this.

Sometime in the future here like maybe two months or so, there's going to be a reaction within the generations that are in school now. And I got that data set before I did any of my numeric analyses. But the data sets were basically saying that sort of like the middle school and to high school level kids are going to get savvy to the war and a lot of them are going to get an attitude, okay? And this attitude is going to be hardened by the fact that there are a lot of them with the same attitude and they're going to start talking to their parents about the war. Their parents are going to start getting freaked out and starting to react because maybe the kid's right.

And also the kid's attitude is going to come back to bite the Biden regime in the sense that we're going to have according to my data sets, we're going to have full on, absolute counter insurrection in large school systems being run by the kids themselves. Okay? So the kids are going to be tired of all this queer the generation crap and there will be a hard line there. Those people that have adopted the queer the generation crap from the deep state, those kids are going to be a lot of them are going to be pulled back by the sheer size of the anti deep state group. And these kids are going to be savvy to who they're fighting.

So you'll start hearing the kids talk about the Km Kazarian mafia and they'll be able to differentiate the Kazarian mafia, they'll be able to tell you the history, they'll be able to point you to the Veterans Today articles that will detail anything you want to know about them. Yada, yada, yada. Right? And so this is going to start a ground up kind of a thing that's going to cause problems both with the parents as they try and react, but also more so with the school administrators. Because in the data sets it's saying a lot of these kids are just going to say go into the classroom and then every time the teacher says anything they're going to cat call, they're going to disrespect, they're going to throw out the truth, they're going to get up and cause problems.

Just basically not able to take the bullshit anymore. And so you'll see teachers running out of the classroom in tears, teachers totally freaking out because their socialism nonsense doesn't fly. They don't know why and that will be a large part of it. The data set said that the bewilderment the puzzlement on the part of the teachers and the administrators last for some months. A lot of them crashing and burning in that process in the sense that the data shows teachers resigning, administrators quitting, and that sort of basically have a rebellion in very large school districts to where the data would have it be that these school districts were more or less being operated by and under the control of the students themselves.

Not so much their parents even. It's just really strange guy. But that part right there takes us into 2024. So that's my kind of lead into 2024 in terms of the level of disruption we're going to be having here. Now.

Whatever it is that we get into here, I think that happens before the end of the year. Before the end of this year. It may happen further into the new year, but it just seems that the building tension levels are dropping too rapidly around in November to be able to sustain anything into the new year. So it looks like they get swamped at some point near the end of November. As I say, it could maybe take into January.

It's difficult to estimate, but that alone is going to be a reshaping of the social order at a level that the political powers had not anticipated at all. That's going to strike them right out of the blue. It's like what's going on over there? It's going to be really interesting I think it's going to be really so this is so interesting because there's so many layers to this. But while a lot of people are looking to what's happening with DC or politics or they're getting caught up in that level of the battle and they've now come to this conclusion that okay, maybe they're.

Saying, okay, the left has been infiltrated and taken over by the Communists, and they're trying to destroy America, which is different than just kind of left versus right. And I disagree with your policies. There's been this mass awakening towards that level, okay? The media is fake news. Big Pharma is out to harm us.

There's been that level of awakening. But what you're seeing is that the next level in the most significant awakening for the masses is to realize that there is a small group of evil psychopaths that are trying to control and kill the entire world. Things that you and I believe that we've kind of understood and awakened to, that when that realization hits the masses, that becomes the trigger point, that becomes the tipping point in which all of their systems start to fundamentally collapse. Because once you see things from that perspective, you see through the schools, you see through the media, through Hollywood in a way that you didn't before, and you will no longer go along with it because you know what's ultimately there. So that's what you're seeing as a gigantic it's almost as if 2024 from here, what you're saying is that 2024 is when the Great Awakening hits the mainstream and the entire structure that the deep state has of this world is shaken to the core.

I'd say 2024 over the process of 2024, the Great Awakening eats the deep state. It eats fake news, and we digest it the rest of that year and into 2025, and then we shit it out, okay? It's that level of stuff that's going on.

But the breakdown is concurrent with that. A lot of the breakdown stuff is leading people to a level of awareness, right? So it's the breakdown of things that allow them to see the Kazarian Mafia hand behind it. The Soros picked know, the defund, the police movement, which was paid for by George Soros, all of these kind of things. So the larger battle of the deep state versus
the populace will indeed emerge.

It'll emerge from an event here. Like I say, that's going to be eyes wide open kind of a thing, but it won't stop there, okay? So as we get into this larger awakening and people start seeing the Kazarian mafia and understanding how they work, then they're also going to have to face the idea of space aliens, okay? They're going to have to come to grips with that because it will be opened up by whatever this event is. Because you have to understand that everything that drives the Kazarian mafia is space alien oriented.

The Khazarian Mafia, Klaus Schwab, George Soros, all of these people in this inner group are not or descriptively. They are Jewish, okay? They're not Jewish in that religious sense. The way that your neighbor, who happens to be Jewish and goes to synagogue is religious. Their religion goes to the core of the Hebrew words that are in the Torah and those Hebrew words have no word for God in them.

The Torah has no word for Jew in there at all. It is a discussion, a description by the people who endured it, the people in Judea. It is a description of how to live with the El. The Elohim, the space aliens that came down and conquered them. These are the same Elohim that conquered the Khazarians and then were driven out or left for whatever reason, we don't know.

I'm speculating that there was a war between the Elohim and some other space aliens in India, and that the Elohim lost, and they were driven out of their Khazarian stronghold, which is in the northwest of India, and they went to Judea. But the Khazarians felt this huge thing of abandonment. And a lot of the literature within the Talmud, within the Zohar, which is this mystical aspect of Judaism, if you get into that, it's all about the abandonment of being the Khazarians and being abandoned by the El who left. And as I say, I think there was a war going on. The l got defeated.

They had to hightail it. They hid down in Judea, and they were modifying us genetically. So Klaus Schwab and his buddies at that level within the WEF that are truly the Khazarian Mafia, they think they have an extra bit of DNA. They think they are genetically modified. Okay?

And that that success in their genetic modification, it shocks them because they think it was successful. But then shortly thereafter, the l left and they started their genetic modification with the Essenes in southern Yemen, which they took to Judea. And those are the people of the Bible. That's Moses, Adam and Eve, all of these kind of people. It took the l 191 years to successfully create Adam, to successfully genetically engineer Adam.

It took them another, I think, eleven years to create Eve, and they had seven Eves that they discarded because they weren't acceptable to Adam. Okay? So these are the nature of the people that you're dealing with, the Khazarian Mafia. We're all genetically modified. All humans are.

Humans have 23 chromosomal pairs. And you can check me on all this science and go involve the real guys, like scientists, and they'll say, yeah, he's correct about that, but he's full of shit about all this alien stuff, right? But our chromosome pairs come down and set off into the chromosome, and we have 23 of these. What actually happened was in number two, it was expunged, it was cut out. Now, let me state something here factually.

No human biological engineer has ever inserted successfully a chromosome in any being. No human biological engineer has ever successfully inserted an effective gene in any being. Our genetic modification is called CRISPR, because it burns out genes. That's why it's crisped. It has a telltale residue that it leaves, that anybody that examines that genome can see.

That this was a Crisp critter, right? That this being that you're looking at that DNA had been through this genetic modification process where part of the genome was burned out. All humans on Earth that we've been able to assay have some level of this in their system. Usually it's number two has been burned out, and number three then becomes number two. And that's why we have 23 pairs instead of 24 pairs or 26 or 28, like all the other primates.

Okay? And here's the thing about the Khazarians. The Khazarians were done before the L got to their success with Adam and Eve. That really pisses off the Khazarian mafia that the Essenes were successful and the L really liked them. Okay?

Another thing about that was that the Khazarians, the burn, was only partially out. So the Khazarians have this little dongle, this little remnant of the old number two chromosome in their DNA. And you can actually determine who is Khazarian by examining the DNA and looking for this little stub. Okay? They think within their own internal understanding that this was an insertion.

And I dispute that. I think that it was just a bad burn job. So they think they have some extra DNA. Now, there's also another aspect of this. The source people for the Khazarians were Homo capensis, the Coneheads, the Rothschilds.

All of these great banking families are Coneheads. They have that capensis. And Homo capensis is another species. Homocapensis was concurrent with ancient humanity. And so when the L came down, they chose to work for the Khazarians on a Homocopensis variant that was Mongolian in nature, as are the Khazarians.

So the Khazarians have a Mongolian DNA set. There you go. Central Asia. Okay? And so they modified that.

And so you will see all of the Khazarians through history. First off, they're removing all of the paintings or the portraits of the Khazarians from the 800s all the way through to modern time from all the museums. They can find them because it points out that they're cone heads, right? They have the very tall, bald heads, even in the women. And they used to disguise it with these wrapped gossamer kind of fabrics and stuff.

And those were painted in. And so these paintings are being removed everywhere from museums because they know that people are starting to wise up. And this is something that they don't want to have happen, is for people to think, uhoh, we've got Ashkenazi Jews over here, but we've got coneheads over there that are the Khazarians. And they're not even human. They're not as human as we are.

They're not the same kind of human. Right? And so the Khazarians don't want that to happen, but it's happening in any event. So I'm giving you details you probably don't really care about here. But nonetheless, the genetic modification of this goes to and all of the space alien connections to the Khazarians are going to come out as part of this war.

And that elevates us up in terms of the awakening relative to humanity in a general sense, so that we won't as you say, our vision is going to enlarge, but our vision is going to enlarge, and it's not going to focus back on Earth 100%. So now we're going to get into this period of time where we're going to start focusing on the people that are living in the Moon. The moon is inhabited. It's inhabited now. It's been inhabited as long as there's been humans on this planet.

It may not be the people that are living there now. The beings that are living there now may not be the people that built it, though. We don't know. There's so much in the way of speculation about stuff we don't know about that, but we do know it's inhabited. We do know that they're very energetic at this point, and they've been extremely energetic about, I want to say, last six, seven months, and that there's just a really weird curiosity here.

So you remember the movie 2001 a Space Odyssey, right? And it starts off, they go to the moon and they dig, and they dig and they dig, and then they get that big black object, the obelisk, there. And then one morning, because it's uncovered, the sun comes up and the sunlight strikes it, and it sends off this message, right? Okay. So in that movie, they decided to go to the dig up that object, not just because they were out digging holes, but because that area of the Moon in the storyline had heated up unexpectedly.

It was just showing a sign of warmth that nobody could figure out why it was there. And so government decided, well, let's go look at it. Well, curiously, we've got a spot on the Moon that's just on the edge of the far side that we can't see that's heating up, and it's been doing so for, like, the last three or four weeks. There's some activity that we can measure down here that's going on under the surface of the Moon that's presenting us with different temperature gradients than we would usually see by some serious factor. So maybe they're who knows what they're doing there that would cause such a thing.

But the fact that our governments are aware of it means that they're going to be reacting to it at some point. And it is also curious that during this time we see the Indians landing on the South Pole and this kind of thing, right. So I think we're going to get into I don't know how much of the population will have it in their heads, but certainly by 2025 it'll be relatively common to come across conversations about people talking about what's going on with the beings on the Moon and maybe we'll actually have some kind of interaction with them at that point or be planning it. All right, folks, I've got a quick message for you. I have one simple question if today you could no longer go purchase more food for your family with the food stores that you have in your home, how long would you be able to feed your family?

Would it be a week? Three weeks? A month? Two months? A year?

This is a really important question, folks, that we have to be very realistic about, because the elites are proactively trying to put us into a state of food crisis and a state of famine. I'm sure you've seen all of the different food processing
plants and farms that are blowing up. We've got cattle dying by the tens of thousands. They're proactively trying to collapse our food system because they know if they can control our food, they can control us. And so one of the best ways to be outside of their control is to be able to have our own stores of food and to be able to produce our own food.

So there's really two things I would recommend. One is having heirloom seeds that you can grow your own food with. Making sure, though, that they're non GMO heirloom seeds. That that way you can harvest your seeds this year, use them next year. You can use these seeds for generations, literally.

It's how it will work. The other thing, though, is this high quality storable food. This is food that's sitting somewhere. It's hidden in your basement, buried in your backyard, whatever it is. So that way, if there is a crisis, if there is an emergency, you might have three months set aside to get through that time period.

And so for this, I would highly recommend a company called Heaven's Harvest. This is an amazing, Christian owned patriot company. And what they're doing is they're making high quality storable food. Again, a lot of the food companies, they say these food buckets, they're all about maximizing calories per dollar. They're filling the buckets with a bunch of filler and junk like sweet beverages, et cetera.

But Heaven's Harvest, they focus on very high quality food that will last up to 25 years on the shelf. They also sell heirloom seeds. You can buy all of your seeds. You can buy all of your storable food. And look, folks, personally, I would recommend having at least three months per person in your household, if not six months or even a year.

Again, depends on your budget. But I would definitely make sure you have some seeds, because those seeds could be worth their weight in gold, if not more in the future. So to go ahead and do this right now, go open up a new tab and go to Heavensharvest.com. And if you use the promo code Seth, that's S-E-T-H promo code Seth, you'll save 15% off of your entire order. So again, folks, the time is running out, and you'd rather be three months or one year early than one day late.

Again, Heavensharvest.com and use promo code Seth to save 15% today. So things are really, I mean, just the next twelve to 24 months, we're going to see society change in a fundamental way, which I guess makes sense because our society is what it is, because it's the shadow on the wall in Plato's cave. That's what we see our society as when the fire goes out and the handlers that are making the shadows are no longer there and we emerge from the cave, everything about the way of life that we remember will be.

So let's go back to Plato for a second, okay? A lot of our references such as Plato's cave and the Dionysi's discourses and stuff, those originate out of the Yuga, okay? So this is a true fundamental thing that affects humans. Humans are not the same always over time. Humans on Earth, this happens because the Earth wobbles up and down relative to the broad mass of the galactic center.

And so if we were to look into galactic center, we would see a bubble with all this emanations coming on out, and then we would see this big obscuring mass of all the stars and the planets and all the rest of the galaxy there. And we're out here going like this with our solar system around the edge of the galaxy. When we get up into here, outside this obscuring mass in these areas here, we get more galactic center emanations, various different kinds of radiation. We've had two different kinds of radiation that we've discovered impacting Earth since about 1996 or so. In any event, though, so humans actually change over time.

Now, when we are obscured, that's the Kali Yuga. We're not getting very much of these galactic center emanations coming through the mass. They're being absorbed by all the stars and all of that, and so we're kind of dim. Okay, so Plato's cave and all of the great thinkers of the past are really standout people because they stood out from the mass of otherwise dim individuals, which will always happen. You'll always have that big spread of humanity, but that big spread will have more geniuses as we go forward because we're going to get more emanations out of the galactic center.

So next generation will be born, in general, smarter than this generation, et cetera, et cetera, for some 10,000 plus years in the Kaliyuga. Our understanding is so limited that we now outside of the Kaliyuga by 325 years. Getting into our 326th year outside of it need to stop referencing that as though it is the end all and be all of human thinking, okay? Plato could not have conceived ideas that we hold in our head now relative to the natural world, let alone technology and any of that kind of stuff, right. Because his mind could not have coped with it.

In the Kali Yuga, the height of technology is a donkey for transportation or a sailboat. Okay? So that gives you some concept of where we had been. So I don't accept the idea that we should take the great thinkers of the past as being necessarily a guide for ourselves. And then here's something else.

As we came out of the kali yuga, as we were even in it from maybe the one one hundreds, okay? So it ended in 1698, but maybe from the 100s onward, with the rise of the Khazarian mafia, they took over what we would laughingly call science. And in taking over science, they pegged it to this weird idea that is the core of our physics now. And we had to abandon that core in order to work with electricity through leclerc, Maxwell, through heavyside, through tesla, all of these people abandoned the core. They didn't even think about this the way that the Khazarians do, okay?

But the Khazarians and all of our science has this idea that if you take enough sand, enough grit, and you mash it together in the appropriate way, it will achieve consciousness somehow. Okay? So basically, their whole science, our physics, our astrophysics, our deep physics, the large hadron collider, all of these things are based on the idea that consciousness arises from grit and that the grit exists. So, in other words, if all life were to disappear, the Khazarians have this view that reality would still exist with planets and stars and all of that kind of thing, right? And there'd still be dirt.

And even if all there's no bacteria, no plant life, no human life, no life at all, they're saying that dirt would still be here, that grit would still exist in the form of planets and so on. And that is not true, okay? That whole premise is a false premise that has diverted all of our science into a way that's impractical, and we have to bust out of it in order to achieve the engineering success that we have with tesla, maxwell, et cetera, right? Okay? So that's a fake understanding of reality, and it leads to a dead end.

It leads to the einstein quantum mechanics that has held us in stasis for over a hundred years. We've had no significant inventions since tesla. We've had incremental increases in efficiency in our inventions, but no significant inventions since tesla. And it's because we're operating on this quantum mechanics idea that nobody can reconcile, because it's impossible to reconcile the idea that you can get enough sand together to eventually have it become consciousness. And that's at the core of their thinking.

So here's the deal. There's a few radical scientists out there and the wu people that understand that consciousness existed. And consciousness created the grit. It created what we call here reality, our materium, okay? It created matter and stuck parts of itself in the matter.

You, myself, your dog, the bacteria, we're all living consciousness that's been stuck in the matter. Now, I have a theory as to why it did that, and a lot of people think I'm crazy about this, but I think it did that to try and discover novelty, because it's setting out there bored. Consciousness is everything, knows everything. It's all for all time, and it's bored. And then it has this idea that itself was new, and the idea was, could it create novelty?

And from the point that consciousness got the idea that it could create something it did not know about, it had to have an experiment. We are that experiment. So my viewpoint is that all of reality is ontologically created, right? The consciousness pushed aside a space within itself and created this material that we're in manufactured this illusion of matter and stuck our consciousness interacting with this illusion in order that stuff may happen and hopefully stuff that it could not conceive of happening so that it would have the shock of the new that rush of oh, my God, look at that. Right?

It would have release language. That's my understanding of why it did that. I have a lot of reasons to suspect and to be able to prove that it did indeed do that, that we are in fact ontologically downward, not grit upward. And that makes a huge difference in our science. And so we're going to abandon a lot of the science, especially from Einstein onward, as being really bogus.

And I think we'll also abandon a lot of the Kaliyuga thinking as being just that. Oh, well, that's so know you were so dense back then. That was the best you could do.

Interesting. Which really kind of goes in line with this mass awakening. So looking at kind of jumping in. I got so many questions here still, but I guess okay, one thing this is kind of looking at more of the kind of more immediate. In 2024, you've talked about how basically the current regime will have run out of power, run out of money, run out of their ability to keep the people within this delusion that allows them to stay in power.

So how do you think Trump fits into this? Because obviously they're
trying everything possible to take him, and we don't even know how many assassination attempts there have been. I'm sure there have been plenty. But do you think that something happens where he steps back in? Is he elected back in?

Does he just kind of disappear from the political scene? I mean, what are your thoughts on that? No. Okay, so if human politics are really weird and you can have all the data focusing on one thing and a different outcome arises, usually it's not the opposite. It would be something at 90 degrees instead of 180 degrees.

Right. So I think there's going to be a 90 degree emergence of some form. All right, how do I want to phrase I think that we have Trump in our future, and I think that we have a very I got to be careful about the choice of word. Okay, so there will be disharmony, but it won't be disharmonus, okay? We will have upset and we will have vast quantities of change.

But in the main, I think it's going to be a change towards a legitimate kind of a progress. So I do see Trump coming back, but I don't see us having the election under the current regime kind of understanding of those sorts of things. So maybe the military would come in and we'd have an election all in a day and Trump would be reelected and then we would set off on this. That does not change things, right? So even with Trump running things and even with all of us pulling together, starting to become more cohesive, starting to address our own problems and starting to re engineer our social order from the bottom up, which I do see in the data, okay?

And that's another area of discussion. But even with all of that, it does not change the fact that we will be at war. We will be in a war with the deep state that will go on for some period of time, even if we really can't figure out who's the enemy at the moment kind of a thing, right?

I think 2024 marks that point where we step over the threshold and whether we're dealing with the space aliens that year or not, we are preparing for that such that our social order is not allowed to ever go back. We won't be going back to the idea of isolated Earth, of humanity alone. And that has hugely profound implications for all different kinds of things within our social order. So it will become necessary that anybody that is a Christian examine Christianity and their relationship with it as it comes out that Christianity based on the Old Testament is based on dealings with the Elohim. Who are these space alien oppressors that came down and genetically modified us and have abused us and are adrenochrome addicts and they killed so many?

So the Elohim people, those aliens were also the ones in Mesoamerica. There's reasons to suspect that that group split themselves and part of them came over to mesoamerica for a while and messed about with the Aztecs and the Mayans. In some of the discussions there, as well as allusions to it in weird places. In Ancillary books in the Talmud, for instance, you come to an understanding that they were so addicted to adrenochrome that they at one point had a staggering 10,000 individuals killed in a single 24 hours period in order to free the adrenal glands and burn them such that these guys could huff them. Now, I have reason to think that maybe they're huffing the adrenochrome because of a lack of the galactic emanations.

Right? I think that the L originated much closer to Galactic center than we did and that they deliberately come out here as a predatory species because they know we're in our Kali Yuga and they can take advantage of us. I don't think they're great thinkers. I think they're truly horrific beings. If you read the Old Testament, word for word as it is actually written, you see these horrible crimes like the Archangel Michael being interrupted in some activity and taking his finger and pushing it right through the head of the person that interrupted him and killing him dead.

And then because he was annoyed, going and killing all of the family. So these are the beings that we're dealing with. So the people that have these beings as their gods are going to have to interact with that relationship with themselves and with their religion and with their gods. And they won't have any choice in the matter because all this will be coming out especially as regard to space aliens. So what does the appearance of our officialdom and our general social order discussing beings on the moon do to your religion?

Right? If you're Christian, if you're Jew and everybody around you is talking about factually, looking up and seeing the beings on the moon and people putting out channels on YouTube showing what happened last night like the 05:00 news on what the moon is going what they're doing up there, that's going to fundamentally alter your relationship with your religion, no matter how secure it is. And then you get in and you start looking at all the religions on the planet, with very few exceptions, are based on these space aliens. Hinduism to some extent Buddhism, because it has so much Hinduism in it. Although I don't think Buddha personally was influenced by the space aliens and is too further on.

But Muhammadism, okay, muhammad received the Quran from a space alien in a cave. That space alien was the Archangel Michael. He was one of the last El on this planet and he left with that last group. So Muhammad ism, is based on that interaction with the Archangel Michael, which we now know was one of the Elohim and was a space. So so we're going to have a real comeuppance relative to our past now, especially understanding that all these religions originate in the Kali Yuga, so know when we are not really that swift and they can come down and take advantage of us.

So we've got a few hundred years of real work here going through all of this, right?

So I want to talk a little bit about banking. This is one of the big topics I had that I wanted to cover with you because you had talked in a lot of ways predicted what happened earlier this year with the bank collapses that we saw happen. If you look at the amount of money that's been pulled out of the banking system in the past, I think a year or two, it eclipses what happened in 2008. I mean, it's a massive amount of money that's leaving the banking system now. Of course, the official narrative is that everything's fine and the recession is the recession worries.

Have passed and everything, but all the information I'm seeing kind of points to a very different scenario, that we're really on the edge of a pretty bad period. So what do you kind of foresee, or how do you look at the current situation with the banking system and how do you see it unfolding over the next six months or so? Over the next six months, we'll take a very large hit. Maybe it'll be a third of the major banks will fail. Okay?

You're alluding to money being taken out of the banking system. And that has this interesting ancillary effect, because we have fractional reserve. So every time somebody comes in and takes money out and we'll just call it the Rockefellers or the Rothschild Bank or the Federal Reserve, it doesn't matter any of the central banks, but you put money in, you put $100 in, they get to keep loaning out, because they count that as a fraction. And they have all these multipliers times ten, times 20, et cetera. And you get out to the point where you're dealing with derivatives flat out, you might be dealing with a magnification of 100 times that right there.

So anytime you come in and you withdraw that, you're collapsing all of those ripples that are based on that amount. Now, if I take my $100 out of the bank, it actually doesn't mean that they have to pony up this money, but it does mean they don't have that support for that continuing fractional reserve system. And so much money has come out that it's actually affected the functioning of a lot of these central banks. And so we're hearing rumors about the cracks in the Rothschild empire. Now, there's another aspect to this.

When the Central Bank creates money, bear in mind, okay, so we have a Central Bank. All these central banks are Rockefeller Rothschild banks. They've been imposed on us by law. We must deal with them, and they have never, ever been audited. And they're not subject to any audit.

So when they say that they've got $100 in here, maybe they don't have that. Maybe they've lied, maybe there's only $1 in there. But regardless, whatever they think they have in there, they are always lying on every one of these layers, putting out. And so they will put out 20 times your $100, and then they'll do another 20 times your $100 that they're just passing out to their friends, because it all spends the same. You don't know that those are bogus dollars.

And so our system is so hugely corrupted, so hugely polluted, because they've been doing this for over 100 years, that it is not auditable any longer. We would not have enough time to be able to go back through and see who did what with money, at what point. And so what I suspect will happen is that the events that we're undergoing now, independent of that and not part of that driving release language. This would only maybe double our usual deviation, but we'll see major collapses at like, tier one banks. And we're seeing that now rumors of that with the Rothschild empire.

And we're seeing this now rumors of disquiet in Vanguard and BlackRock because they live on this float, right? And they're not able to do what they want anymore because so much money is coming out of the system and going elsewhere. Gold, silver, Bitcoin, whatever, as long as it's not in dollar form or as long as it's not in fiat currency, it's out of their system. So I suspect that the bank collapse that we're going to have over these, like, next, I want to say before the
end of January, okay, so it'll appear sometime before then. We should have it bubbling up in the background.

That's going to be the start of a chain of events that will continue through 2024, that will be going ongoing as we are continuing on, such that every month for 2024, it'll become noticeable that your money is worth less than the month before, and that previous, and that the month you're just going through. So in January and then February, you'll see that there's more bank failures in February than there were in January. There's more disruption. You'll become more aware of it, and it'll just keep going on and on and on such that it is a continuing annoyance in your life as you go forward. Now, I do not expect the banking system to recover.

There are those people that suggest that the Federal Reserve will save itself and allow the other fiat currencies to die off. Now that we have gold and oil and energy backed rubles and so on and so on, I don't think that that's going to occur. All right? So I do not think that the Federal Reserve will be able to save itself. So I think that we're going to have to go through a very difficult process here, which would be reintroducing legal tender, legal money within the United States.

That probably because it'll be backed by something solid, probably will not be allowed to be used outside the country.

That was the way the ruble was managed against us way back when, during the Soviet period of time, right? They had a very effective, strong money inside. You couldn't buy anything. They had no goods. But that was a secondary issue.

Their money was solid because it was not allowed to be diluted and didn't go outside the country. So we'll have to put some kind of rules and that sort of thing on there. But think of what this is going to do as that occurs, just these initial banking collapses. We're going to see a lot more information come out because people won't be being bribed anymore. And so they're going to say, okay, you're not paying me anymore, so I'm going to dump out all of these photos I've got of you strangling that guy or whatever the hell, right?

So there'll be a lot of that as the banking system unravels and that'll contribute to more banking system unraveling because a lot of that is blackmail that's been used to hold and stitch the system together. So we're truly at the end days of that system. I think that's great. I think it's a nasty period to live in, but in terms of we're going to suffer, but the end result is good, the direction is good, and I don't see anything other than good coming from the fact that we will suffer here. And in that sense, we will have purification and we will have suffered for our sins in undoing all of this kind of stuff, right?

Our inattention and allowing all this stuff to occur, et cetera, et cetera. So we'll have to undo all of that as we focus our attention back into our own money system and understand where it goes. And we're going to have to educate people. Our school system is going to be upended because of this, because look at how much of it is dependent on subsidies through the federal government. That's how they control the school system.

That's going to break down when they can't get out the subsidies anymore. And you'll see a lot of the school systems where the administrators, as I was saying, will resign because the kids are in rebellion because they don't want to be taught this horseshit that doesn't do them any good the rest of their lives. And basically it's the great awakening where you're just not putting up with the bullshit anymore. And as the Kazarian mafia and the central bank and all the bankers that's all they have is purveyors of bullshit, we're about to leave them in the dust of history. It won't be a fun time, though.

What do you think happens to gold and silver amidst this banking collapse and this kind of end of these fiat currencies? They go to Unobtainium. Okay. So we'll see a brief period of time where there will be nominal dollar amounts. You'll see silver rising to the point where it eventually becomes worth the same amount or more than gold, but it'll be meaningless, okay?

Because you won't be able to. A, you wouldn't want to sell your silver or gold for fiat dollar bills, and there wouldn't be anybody around to sell to that had those kind of dollars, right? We're going to go through that sudden crash of a monetary system. That the same kind of thing that existed here in the 1930s that led places like Tonino, this little town over in Thurston County, to come up with wooden, nickels, wooden currency because there was no circulating currency. So that's what we're going to run into.

Once people stop taking your card, then you got to go to the bank and then you get paper money, and then you go back to the store and they say, no, I don't want that. We can't do anything with that. And that's what we're headed to, I actually expect. All right, so under those circumstances, if we were to arrive at that point where the people are rejecting the fiat currency within the commercial system in the United States, that I think could be the prompt for a resurgence of the military and the reemergence of Trump, okay? So bear in mind something that is factual.

Trump was asked to run.

Okay? You rarely hear people talk about that. Trump was a Democrat way back in the day, right? He's not a commie. So the Democrats left him.

They became leftists and commies, and he would never have associated with them in any event. But Trump was asked to run. And so that begs the question, who asked Trump to run? Okay? And so in my opinion, a group of individuals that I've stylized since 2001 as a self organizing collective asked Trump to run.

And I think that that self organizing collective is in the main military and has a certain attitude about also, it's my opinion, and I could be quite wrong about this, of course, about any of know wildly speculative. No one confirms know military doesn't talk to me. FBI follows me, and the officialdom shadows me and gives me a lot of heat, but they don't come and chat. Right? So I'm basing this on observation and some level of acumen, but I'm of the opinion that those individuals say there were a bunch of generals, right?

Whoever it was that asked Trump to run, I think they were motivated by something that we have yet to see emerging into our reality here that will ultimately I think that they were prompted by information that they had about people on the moon. Okay? So I think there was something external to Earth that prompted these guys to say, okay, they started getting together. I think they started getting together in 63, november 23, the day after they shot Kennedy. I think this sock formed.

I think they were nascent ahead of that. I think that there were some elements of it that gathered in 1957, but in 63, they formed up. And since that period of time, all of the members within that socket, the control level, in my opinion, have become aware of this external to Earth and external to humanity pressure that is being put on all of us, even if us guys don't recognize it or know it yet, it's being put on them. And so they've come to the point where they said, okay, the money's collapsed. This is projection.

I'm projecting that sometime in the next few months, they'll come to the point where they'll say, okay, the money's collapsed. The deep state isn't going to be able to maintain the Biden regime. It's all falling apart. And this kind of thing, now is our time to emerge. When they do emerge, there will necessarily be a focus here in the United States rebuilding getting the social order back together and stuff.

But I bet you there's this underlying current that goes through there that we're doing all of this stuff not just because it's the good thing to do, but because we need to do it, because there's something pending and we've got to get our shit together in order to face that pending occurrence. And I think it's the interaction with what I term the other space aliens in some form. And so basically, looking at the military as an example and even talking to General Flyn who's become a friend in this process, it's easy to look at the military and think you look at General Milley and all the different characters in it and think, oh gosh, it's just completely compromised. I'm not going to depend on them. And when push comes to shove, the ones that would have been protecting the Constitution were forced out from the vaccine mandates and they've done a great job of calling the military and just keeping the ones that are going to be following whatever orders come down from Biden.

But you think that there's a strong opposition to that that could perhaps play a significant role in helping to really to remove this communist scourge from our country. So I spent the first 17 years of my life as a military brat, so I've seen this from the inside, right? I've grown into this. And so it's true of any war, when we get into the first part of the war, the first thing we do is to shed all the generals and a lot of the colonels that are basically useless, that are just there for their pensions, et cetera, right? We always have a big level of resignations of generals and functioning colonels prior to getting into any kind of actual combat.

And you'll see that this always precedes the actual emergence of that conflict. So we were shedding generals in 1940 and 1941 in anticipation of going into World War II, right? The same thing happened with 1910 relative to the war emerging in 1913. The same thing happened in the 1950s prior to Korea, but it didn't happen quite the same because we were just coming out of World War II. We had yet to build up this, what everybody calls the civilian military, which are the
guys that want to be diplomats, want to put on the uniforms and have the chauffeurs and all of that, but have never really done anything, right.

They're not really functionaries. And the military operates, whether it's the Navy or the army, I'm asserting the Air Force and even the Space Force operate on this. And that is that you have non comms, right, non commissioned officers. That's really where the power of all militaries lie. Officers lead, but it's non commissioned officers that manage everything.

And so you will see, if you wanted to go in, it won't come out for a while, but I bet you there are whole units within our military that had no vaccine, the non comms would not have it operational. And so I know personally, I have met Navy guys that went against orders prior to Korea in order that they might be able to get what they needed for their ship and their crewmate because they knew they were going to be deployed in like eight months, right? And so no, they weren't coasting, they weren't decommissioning, they were stashing toilet paper, they were stashing ammo, everything they could do to get what their people would need. And that's just the way the non comms are even today. It's that way, right?

They have a personal interest basically in keeping themselves and their people alive when the shit hits the fan and they can see that that fan blade's turning and stuff's going to happen. So I think that there is that core within our military. And you could ask General Flynn about his impression of some of these hardcore noncoms. But I know that there are whole units, I don't know how large, so I know there's companies, I don't know if it extends up to battalions or regiments in the main because that's a lot of individuals, three and 5000, right? But there are whole units where they signed all the forms and said the shots were given and they were just shit canned.

They just threw them right away. So that kind of rebellion, that kind of insubordination existed and it'll be those units that will emerge. Bear in mind Cheyenne Mountain was shut up, nobody's come out since. This is when COVID first emerged, right? Trump says you know something about because of caution we need to do this.

And so we've got areas of our military that are isolated from what's going on relative to COVID and the shots and all of that kind of thing. I expect this stuff to change very rapidly. The nature of warfare is different now. So people say, oh the United States Army is so decimated and they can come and take us over easily and so on. The fact of the matter is that, yeah, we've got lots of troops that are ill, the shots did damage to millions and our military is in a shambles.

But mostly warfare is not going to be waged anymore by people with carbines and people marching around, okay? That's just not the nature of warfare anymore. It's drones, it's energy weapons, et cetera, et cetera. So you don't have to move vast quantities of men in order to accomplish your strategic or otherwise goals. You need a hardcore, relatively small group of very technically proficient people in order to achieve great things.

So maybe let's say that there was a drone or a series of drones that were used to do okay to take out lahaina and that it was not a satellite, that it was just drone. So they actually had to have a crew somewhere that fueled the drone, put the batteries in, checked them, all of that kind of stuff, right? So maybe there were a hundred people involved in doing the hit on Lahaina, the actual work. There were two or three that made the decision. There were committees that decided what they're going to do.

They told Oprah and all their friends to be able to piggyback on all of this. That's just the way this thing works. But maybe there were only 100 people that actually did it under those circumstances. We're in a new kind of warfare. So if you want to see an example of this warfare, go and look at the picture of the 911 towers turning to rubble as they fell, okay?

That was a directed energy weapon, it was not shaped charges. There's no other mechanism on this planet that causes that to occur. And the dust tells us that by the way, because directed energy weapons do things to cement and so on that you can find out later. And so again, how many people were involved in bringing down the towers. So we're looking at a mass of the population against a relatively small number.

That relatively small number knows they're small in number and they have no protection once their cover is blown. Once we all look at them, we're getting to that phase. Now it will go from in my opinion, it'll go sweep through the upper echelon and then something will happen. Somebody will be a whistleblower or something and will get documentation. This particular person, this particular corpsman pushed a button that caused Lahaina to disappear.

And maybe he was ignorant, maybe he didn't know that pushing that button because maybe his screen was showing him a game that he had to solve and was part of his training. He doesn't know, he can't tell, he's just working off of a screen. But it'll come down to that point where somebody's name will come on out as having been associated with pushing a button on some of these tasks for the deep state. And then those people will start committing suicide, being disappeared or being confronted on the street or whatever. And at that point when you see that start happening, then you know that we're in that last end game relative to this part of the deep state, to their actual ability to functionally move us around.

And then it's going to be really weird because we won't have government, we won't have officialdom, because bear in mind, all of our lives, even all of my life, okay? The first early part of my life, it wasn't as true as from the 60s on, but from the 60s on all of our social order has been guided in a particular direction continuously and all the fringe people were gathered up and pushed back into that direction continuously by the deep state. We were never allowed to fractional and go off and do all of these things, right? So now we're going to come up to the point where without government control, people will be doing all kinds of stuff that had been shoehorned away from their you know, people were starting to think about going to the moon so they had to create NASA in order to control it, right? So maybe we'll have a lot more private moon expeditions.

Who knows what's going to happen here. And it is this busting open of the control that is going to be the really strange part for all of us. So imagine this situation.

You're sitting there on your porch in the evening and just kicking back and a spaceship comes down and a little me and it sits down there. It's sitting out in your yard. You're all a little freaked out, you don't know what to do. The dog's barking, but you don't run away and door opens up and out comes this being and it says seth, Seth, we've been watching, we've been watching. Love your work.

Can we sit down and chat? And that is official contact, okay? Because they don't want to talk to government. They don't want to have anything to do with official. So we have this in our heads that when the space aliens come here they're going to want to stop in DC and talk to Biden or Pelosi.

No, it won't work that way. So our interaction with the space aliens is not going to be through the layer of humanity that we call government. And once that occurs, government becomes superfluous. We don't need them anymore in any way, shape or form. A, we're going to be smarter because of the galactic center stuff, but we'll also be interacting with the aliens and we'll get a lot of tips for doing things that now require government.

And we won't have to do that because, well, for one thing, government's going to collapse because they won't have the fiat to fund themselves anymore. And that's going to cause all kinds of problems in and of itself as all these uselessly educated people. We've got to reeducate them. We've got to find something for them to do, right? Everybody that's got a degree in gender studies has got to go back to college to learn something fundamental and factual and productive.

So basically we've got to reeducate a whole generation, maybe two. A lot of them will unfortunately die because they took the shots. We're going to see a big wave of that. There is a two and a half year crest. So two and a half years after you take the shot, it appears that a number of people are fine for two and a half years and then they just keel over.

So we're going to see a big wave of that appear. People even now are starting to say about how I took the shot and I regret it.

Just like with my thing here, we've had a 13 times standard deviation in our work productivity as reported by Department of labor. So if you go and look at the statistics. We're running 13 times the standard deviation in the impact on our labor force. This was why they intended to bring up 40 or 50 million people from Africa, Latin America, et cetera, is because they're estimating that we'll have about 45 to 50 million people die. And we're well on the weight of that with just the disabled list, right?

So there's a lot of people that are just dropping out of the labor force that have not yet died and in fact they're now consuming more resources because they're involving themselves with the medical profession to try and stay alive from having taken the shot, right? And so it was the estimate on the parts of the deep state that we were going to need 40 to 50 million new workers. Now they're going about it in order to maintain the Biden regime and that kind of thing. And it's not organized, but it is factual that our labor force has been really hit. We won't be able to recover
it with the people that we have now.

We're going to have to reorganize ourselves to accommodate this. And so maybe that's going to be more robotics available. Maybe we're just going to stop doing a lot of things just because of the lack of the people involved. You just can't get a crew to do something, therefore you just don't do it. And we have to focus on different things for the rest of my life, but also for the rest of the generations that have been affected by this pandemic.

And so that would take us out to 2036 or so and then we'll have a clean generation from that point on. So between now and say, 2036, we will be reorganizing. And then from 2036 onward, you'd be able to say, okay, our society is going to sort of look like this for the foreseeable future, but we're in this all frothy period that we just don't know. We can't tell because there's so much that's been damaged by the attack of the deep state on us pretty soon. Okay?

So I've seen the early signs manifesting in reality and I termed it way back when, as these people won't be able to walk down the street. Okay? And we're seeing that Bill Gates got into a limousine and his limousine was harassed by people that were extremely angry and shouting. And had he been outside of that limousine, probably even though it was in England and they're very restrained, probably he would have suffered some level of ruffianism know, I don't think they would have slugged him because they're, you know, they would have been expressing unkind anger at him and he would not have liked that. He didn't like being in the car.

I'm certain it's going to get really bad for these people and it'll go really quickly as the banks go to the point I'm actually expecting individuals to act out. Right? I expect we'll find out later that some of these individuals have been vaxxed and are just taking out their anger on the people that they see as being the cause of their particular problem. And I say it's an ugly time. Those of us that survive this are going to be really hard sons of bitches, and that's going to be required because we have to stand up as rock solid, I mean, like as iron spine in dealing with these space aliens.

And that part is coming. So the final question I had as we round out is just what are the basic things that people should do heading into this stage of the big ugly of this massive change? The collapse of currency, social unrest, whether it's financial, whether they're staying in the dollar or not, food, living. I know it could be a very broad discussion. What are a few kind of key points, though?

No, it comes down to a very simple concept self reliancy. Okay? So you can't count on anybody else. You can't count on money. You can't count on an infrastructure dependent on that money.

So you are now self reliant. If you don't know how to do it, you're going to have to figure out how to do it. The good news is you don't have to do like I did in my youth. You don't have to go and spend hours a day in a state library to research this stuff. You can still do it online.

I expect our electronic infrastructure to still exist and be effective, and this will seriously aid people because it's going to be the most intense research effort ever undertaken by humanity, in the broad sense, in any time in our past and probably anytime in our future for a great while, because there is a need here. And so you've got to become self reliant. So if you don't know how to do it and you need to do it, you better figure out how to do it, better research it, and every time you make a move. So the big, ugly part of this is that once the banking system collapses, once we get into this idea that everybody understands we're at war and there's no longer a stable footing and so on, then you're at that. Point where you say, oh, jeez, I'm dependent on this bank, so I'd better figure out how to get my money out, how to store it, because the Fiat won't exist.

It's already degrading. Okay, so maybe you're going to buy Bitcoin. Well, then maybe you better figure out how to run a Bitcoin wallet and so you can't rely on people. So you got to go and learn this online and try it and test it and so on, such that you are comfortable being self reliant. And a lot of people are not, and a lot of people want to only take direction.

And so there's going to be a lot of histrionics. If you are. A self reliant person. You're going to come to this point where you're going to have to shove people away because they're going to deplete your resources with their needs and they are not going to be offering anything back. And you are going to be in the position where your resources are going to be stretched pretty thin.

And so you're going to have to say to yourself, I can't support you guys. You're just going to have to do it on your own, right? This is going to be a very difficult and testing time. But as I say, all of the people that come through it are going to be some serious humans, some really stand up people, right? Universe makes us.

And universe has decided that we need to harden up. So there's hope. There's hope. I'm a hopeful person. I'm not negative at all because I know that the functioning of the Kali Yuga and so forth, I'm very optimistic because I know the next generation will be born smarter than the existing one and so on and so on and so on.

And at some point I'll die and then I'll come back. Maybe I'll come back 2000 years, right? I'll be coming back in the ascending stage. So it's going to be really cool. Maybe I'll get my floaty RV.

There you go. Well, as we wrap up, I want to direct people to your substac. It's just cliffhigh substack.com. This is where I go. You've got all your everything you publish comes through here that I'm seeing and also just following you on Twitter, I guess.

X as Cliff Underscore high. I'll put those links below. And so do you have any kind of final thoughts as we wrap up?

Well, I worry about people, so now's the time to get off our butts and get it done. We don't have to really rush out. We've got to pace ourselves. We're in for the long haul. But as I say, I'm very optimistic.

Things are getting better by the day, even though we're in the midst of the chaos, even in Lahaina. The more they push, the more they fight, the more they're wearing down the deep state and they will achieve their agree? I agree. Well, Cliff, thank you so much. I know you're very busy and I really appreciate you taking the time to speak with me.

And just thank you for doing what you're doing and for being here today. All right, folks, I hope you enjoyed that interview. We're now going to be jumping into an economic update with Dr. Kirk Elliott. Kirk, as usual, it's so good to have you on, man.

Thank you so much for being here. It is so great to be with you. As usual. It really admittedly, we just got over this holiday weekend and we just finished this massive move. So my head has been on packing boxes and dealing with trying to park giant U Hauls and trailers.

So I haven't been following what's happening with the financial stuff, aside from following what's happening with the real estate market and then a lot of the things going on with bricks, but I know that you have. So walk us through what's going on right now. Well, lucky for you that you've been moving. You're never going to hear those words again because you'd be sad if you were watching the news. It's not good, brother.

It's not good. So just be thankful that you're unpacking boxes and you haul and everything. So but anyway, so there's been a lot of gaslighting, I would say, from Biden over the last couple of months about how great his economy is, right? And I started thinking about this during the BRICS meetings, when they were having the BRICS meeting, because two different types of communicators, putin and Biden, right? So Putin speaking from this posture of power and confidence.

And to me, it's not the narcissistic, smug, arrogant Putin, right? It's like when you know something that's coming down the road and you know that it's going to happen, you can speak from a point, a posture of power versus it's human nature if you're telling a lie, that you're not going to have very confident approach to your conversation, right? So when Biden talks about, oh, look, look how great the economy is under me, look at how many jobs that we're creating when there's absolutely job losses, look at all the gross domestic product and how it's growing and how we're so robust, right? And look at all this stuff, this advances that we're making, and they're all absolute lies, right? So you can't really understand a lot of what he says anyways, but even if you could, it's coming from a point of weakness, right?

So that's where you look at it. And so when I was watching this BRICS meeting and Putin standing up there and saying all this stuff, and sure enough, by the end of the BRICS meeting, six of the nine largest oil producers in the world are going to be part of BRICS. They've got 31% of global production GDP versus 30% for the G seven nations. They know what they have is something big, and they just made it bigger by basically taking away the petrodollar, right? So now when you've got Biden just basically talking about lies, it's just no confidence, sadly, in anything.

And I'm not trying to be political about it, right? I'm just saying, when he's speaking, there's just no confidence in it. He was in East Palestine the other day, being interviewed and saying, Why aren't you I mean, people there are ticked, right, because of the train wreck and the spill and everything that happened a while ago, and why aren't you helping? And his answer was so awful. There's people there that are dying, they're sick, they're hurt, right?

The economy is in shambles. And he said,
Well, I don't know if you've noticed, but I've been busy traveling all over the world. It's like, what? That's your answer? That you've been busy and traveling all over the world?

And then he named a few countries and it's like your people are hurting in your own country. Knock it off, stay home, help. Right? But maybe it's better than he doesn't help. Because whenever the government tries to help anything, it makes it kind of worse.

But anyways, his lie. So the economy is growing, right? So I pulled up this article. It's an older one, but it really paints a picture of the biden economy because this know, during the artificial intelligence OpenAI chat, GPT, this whole big tech movement that's been going on for the last nine months, that we're moving in that direction. I mean, look at Nvidia, just this poster child for amazing stock success, right?

Because they've got artificial intelligence and they're creating the chips that allow this to happen. So you would think that all of these tech giants with this big huge next wave that's going to engulf the global economy, that they'd be booming, busting at the seams, hiring everybody that they possibly can. But take a look at this list right now. It was published first in January, updated in March. It's a little bit dated, but the numbers are actually getting worse, not better, right?

So amazon 27,000 jobs cut. It's a lot of jobs, right? Meta, 21,000 jobs cut. Alphabet, that's Google, 12,000 jobs cut. Microsoft, 10,000 jobs cut.

Crypto.com, 500 jobs. Now people are like, Kirk, that's only 500 jobs. It's like, yeah, but that's 20% of its workforce. And they're one of the largest crypto companies on the planet, right? Coinbase 2000 jobs cut.

Dell, 6600, ebay, 500. Salesforce, 7000 jobs. Twilio, 1500. Twitter, 3700. I can go on and on and on.

These are a lot of job layoffs, right? And so what's Biden saying? How can he say that the economy is growing and all these numbers are increasing when unemployment is going through the roof? I would rather believe the companies telling us that these people are being laid off because they have to. Because they can't lie at the quarterly shareholders meetings or else the SEC is down their throat, right?

So those numbers are real. Biden's numbers are not. So it's like, well, Kirk, how can the government get away with lying? Oh, well, because they revised the numbers. See, Seth, you've been in media for a long time, right?

And if you tell a story or you're reporting on something and it turns out that you made a mistake, right? And so he's like, I was wrong on that one. And so you give a revision. You recant what you said a few days later and said, I made a mistake on that. Who listens to the recant?

Nobody. They only listen to the first story. So every time you see government numbers and go back and look, go back and look at the government numbers on all these reports that are coming out, they'll post something, three to four days later, it's revised lower so they can A, not get in trouble for lying because they said, oh, yeah, we revised those numbers, right? But nobody reported on it. They only report on the original story, right?

So this is how they get by with some of this garbage, is when you think about it, like the unemployment numbers, for example, these Bureau for Labor Statistics economists, they're working on this for three months straight. You would think they would have it right the first time, right? But then a few days later, it's like, oh, yeah, we made a mistake, and we made a mistake the quarter before and the quarter before that and the quarter before that. And they always revise a few days later because nobody covers it. So this is how they get by with lying.

But at some point, it's like the boy who cries wolf. It's like nobody believes the numbers anymore, right? People don't believe the original story anymore because they're always revised. I was even watching one of the main financial news networks, and they said, well, these numbers are coming out, but we'll see what happens on the revision. This is like, why even report the original anymore?

So this is all nonsense, right? But what is a bigger issue that I'm seeing other than the government lying about numbers, which they always do, is what happens to America after the BRICS meeting, right? So with the BRICS meeting, you have to look at what happened. And nobody was covering that story like we talked about last time, right? CNBC, MSNBC, ABC, NBC Fox News BBC.

Nobody was covering the BRICS meeting. Like, nobody I looked during the Bricks meeting, nobody was covering. Right? We covered it, right? Other Patriot shows were covering it because it's the most monumental economic news of our lifetime, right?

I mean, it's the paradigm shifting moment of the global currency and the reserve currency of the US. Dollar. It's a big. So what happened during that BRICS meeting is they basically removed the petrodollar status, which means that we're going to have to print money like there's no tomorrow to fund all of our obligations, and we're going to have to raise rates to slow down the inflation that that printing creates. That's what's coming up, right?

There was this article that I saw just a couple of days ago on Zero Hedge, and it was so good. It was such a good article. Kurt, before we jump into that, because I want to give that but there's a short video why I wanted to play that I thought of while you were talking about just the reality of what the average Americans facing versus what the White House and the mainstream media are telling us, because they're telling us that things are great. But actually, let me place video because this guy it's a short 1 minute video from TikTok where this guy goes through and looks at the differences between 19 32,023 and it's so telling what's really happening. So I'll play this really quick because I know the next article you want to get into is a really meaty one.

So I want to jump and get this out there first. So let me pull this up. Now. Are in a silent depression. When you compare the Great Depression to today, this is going to absolutely blow your mind.

In 1930, during the Great Depression, the average home in America was $3,900. The average car was $600 and the average monthly rent was $18 or $216 a year. And the average salary was one $300 for the year. Fast forward to today. It is $436,000 for the average home, 48 grand for the average car, and the average rent is $2,000 a month or $24,000 a year.

And we have a $56,000 income for the average American right now. So if you look back to the Great Depression, the house was only three times the average salary. Now it is eight times the average salary. The car was 46% of the salary. The car today is 85% of the salary.

And here's the craziest part. The rent was 16% of the average salary. It is now 42% of the average salary. So I saw that and I was just obviously, we know that biden has completely wrecked the economy. But what this also shows to me the takeaway is this is fiat currency, right?

I think it was Lenin that talked about is Lenin or the or both, perhaps, that talked about taxation as a way of basically grinding the people. So sorry, taxation? No, it was inflation. How inflation was like the silent tax that could grind people down. I mean, that's significant right there.

So they're telling us all things are great, yet everyone's thinking like, you pay all your bills and it's like, well, why do I have no money left? Why do you know, having to use my credit card? Why can't I afford a basic used car? And this is the reality. Doesn't matter what side of the political aisle you're on, this is the reality of life in America now.

Yeah, I mean, so Lennon's comment that you were talking about, the gist of it is if you want to destroy a country, you destroy their it. I mean, that that was the gist of what he was saying and getting at, right, and he's right. And you look at those numbers and that is the end result of fiat based money creation, or money that's just printed by wind. Fiat means by decree, right. So there's no tangible backing behind it.

Right. So what does that tell us? That tells us wages haven't kept up with inflation. That's all that that's telling us. And that's why people are feeling so pinched, right?

That's why people are feeling like they go to the grocery store and their money doesn't go as far as it used to because if your wages were keeping up with the inflation, you wouldn't feel the difference. It'd just be everything's more expensive. But you're making more. Right, but it's not the case. Everyone's feeling every year that goes by, people are feeling more and more pressured, more and more pinched.

They can't make ends meet. And also back then, what even makes it worse is most families only had one income earner in the house back then. It was societal. It was just society. The moms kind of stayed home with the kids or took care of the house while the dad was working.

Now that is so far a thing of the past. Oh, yeah. You've got both moms and dads working sometimes three jobs between the two of them. Sometimes each mom and dad have two jobs each. So you start amplifying that and it makes it even worse than what those numbers are saying.

Oh, yeah. I did a quick calculation, Kirk, I'll throw out there. This is just interesting. So I was curious. So at that time in 1930, when I think gold was what, $20 an ounce, right?

That was before the Confiscation Act, which then upped the price of gold. So gold was around $20 an ounce. So at that time you could buy the average house in America for around 195oz of gold. At that time, in 1930, that same 195oz of gold in today's numbers is almost 400,000. So that's an interesting point.

It's just a side point to throw in there
that literally you have all these changes. And if you're sitting in the dollar during that entire process, say you've got $4,000 to buy a house in 1930, or you're thinking, okay, or I can take 4000 and put it into gold, that $4,000. Say you just stuck it in your floorboards, you dug it out today maybe you can afford a door and a window on a house. Because I know that they've used the analogy of the soup before, but looking at those numbers, I was just curious with that. It's kind of interesting.

Well, and it's so appropriate. You start looking at money in its real basic form of what it is. Gold is real money, silver is real money. Start looking at things throughout history like what you just did, and it's an amazing thing. Gold or silver, they both have maintained their purchasing power parity over time.

You're not falling behind. If you would have owned gold back then and you kept it till today, you didn't fall behind at all, actually. Where the dollar has lost 99% of its value since the early 19 hundreds. 99%. It's brutal, right?

So this is where look at precious metals, gold or silver more as an insurance policy against a collapsing currency as opposed to something that's going to grow and get great investment results from now. Granted you are, because you just look back three and a half years and silver was 1191 an ounce. Today it's 23 and a half. We're averaging over 30% a year growth. It's doubled in three and a half years.

That's incredible. Right? So when you look at it, though, the way that you did, it's like, wow, why didn't I wish I would have invested in gold in the in the years ago when I thought about doing it, right? And people get so caught up and it's like, oh, let's go in stocks, let's go into bonds. Right?

But over time, gold and silver have always proven to be the safest asset in the world. And that number you just said amplifies that statement, like, puts an exclamation point around it. It's like, this is really safe. It's maintained its purchasing power over all those hundreds of years, over all the wars that have happened, over all the inflation, over all the economic corrections, the 2000, the 2009, everything. It's maintained its purchasing power.

It's amazing. It is. So sorry I interrupted you, though, because you were getting ready to talk about this article, which I'll bring up now about the rising GDP and the rising yields. Walk us through what this means. Okay, so this article is written by Matthew Pipenberg with GoldSwitzerland.com.

It's a really good article, but I'm going to simplify it just because bonds can be very tricky. But basically, he said, and he makes the contention, which I do as well, that for years he's tried to make one point, and so have I. The bond market's really smart, right? And it is the thing that is the barometer moving forward to economic correction, what's the strength of the bond market, right. But why?

So you look at what the Federal Reserve of Atlanta just came out with their GDP numbers for the third quarter. Now, every Federal Reserve Bank measures something different. They have all their economic experts that basically measure one thing. So they can basically it's a very siloed approach. Like the St.

Louis Fed measures inflation. The Atlanta one measures gross domestic product. Right. So they said the third quarter GDP was 5.9%. Is that number real or is it phony baloney like every other government number that comes out?

Right. Well, let's just assume that it's real. I do think it's overstated, but let's just assume that it's real. Well, what is gross domestic product? GDP measures everything that you and I and everybody in the country are buying at retail prices from Target and Best Buy or wherever, right?

And so those things that are produced in America. So what should it then be? If it's measuring retail prices that we're spending money on and inflation is measuring the prices of what we're spending on GDP, if the economy we're actually growing would keep up with inflation, it should be the same. So GDP should be in the 15% to 20% range because that's unofficially what inflation is hovering. So basically, meaning that, say, I'm buying a Pin, and a Pin used to be, say, $5 because of inflation.

Say it's now $6, right? So they're saying, oh, well, now you spent $6. So there's say, a 20% increase in GDP. But they're not accounting for the fact that it's actually just 20% more expensive, basically. Am I correct?

They're saying that if GDP is, say, 5%, inflation is 15%, that's a 10% reduction. Like the GP is actually, say, negative 10%. No, it's actually worse than that. So let's just say it were 5% and inflation is at 15. So that's one third of the total GDP.

So that means the economy is really contracted by 67%, right? Because it's 67% less than what inflation is at. So these numbers, they're bragging about 5.9% and they said we could even see a surge of over 8%. This isn't good, right, because it's not keeping up with inflation. You always have to measure everything in light of inflation, like the purchasing power that we talked about, of the houses and the cars and everything that we looked at, right?

It's like, well, who cares if GDP is growing by 5% when the house has gone up by like 80 times, right? Who cares? So GDP should measure inflation, should equal inflation. Well, it doesn't. So what does this now start to tell us?

A story.

So the point of all this is they think that the economy is growing. However, this is where these economists I'm not saying that they're stupid. I'm not saying that the economists at the treasury or the Fed are stupid. They're very smart PhDs. They're not telling you the right information on purpose.

That's what I'm saying.

The treasury market, the US Treasury bond should be the most the safest asset in the world and it's been considered that for decades. Right. And why? Well, because it's the long term treasury bill of the United States, the most robust economy, the wealthiest nation, and even when push comes to shove, if we run out of money, congress just going to raise the debt ceiling and print more money because we're the reserve currency. So basically the propensity for a default on a US Treasury has been about zero.

It's actually been considered a risk free investment. So when you have something that's got very little risk, it's going to have a very low rate of return. The interest rate is going to be like it was like 1%, like forever. Right. So compare that to a junk bond.

Like Michael Milken, the junk bond salesman king, right. So here's what he had to do to sell junk bonds to his clients and say, hey, client, have I got a deal for you. Right. So there's this company, they might go out of business in nine months, but you could make a killing on it in that nine months because they're paying 15% interest on their bonds, right? That's a junk bond versus the US Treasury, which is classified as the safest asset in the world.

Very low interest rate. So what's happening with Treasuries around the world right now. The yields are going up, which means their safety is not really there. Whenever you have a higher yield, it always means a riskier investment, right? So you got to keep that in mind.

You've got all this debt that we're amassing as a country, and now the cost of servicing that debt is going up, not just on corporate bonds or muni bonds, but at the sovereign debt level. To me, that's the slow death of a country. And it's not just happening here. It's happening all over the world. So it is like this article saying this is a major sign of an uhoh.

I wouldn't say it's an uhoh. I'd say it's a death trap, is what I would say that it is, because debt driven growth is not growth like these supposedly smart economists at the Fed and at the Treasuries. Debt driven growth is not growth. It's stimulus money. Growth comes from you and me and everybody else going and buying those pens with our own money, buying TVs with our own money, buying cars, buying houses.

That's real growth. Debt based growth is not real growth. So debt based growth is an oxymoron. It just truly is. You can't have debt based growth now.

You can in the short term, you provide stimulus money. That stimulus money gets injected into the stock market, gets handed out to people. Short term, it can boost an economy medium. And long term, it's the death of that economy because ultimately, you have to pay back the piper, right? So that's where we are.

So I'll just throw in. So basically, I like breaking this down in little analogies that my little pea brain can understand, right? So it's kind of like, say my household expenses are $5,000 a month, and that's representative of my capacity to earn money, et cetera. But say I get a credit card with, say, $100,000 limit, and I start spending an extra ten grand every month with a credit card. And I'm like, Look, I'm at a $15,000 a month lifestyle.

I'm growing, I'm expanding, but I'm doing it through, taking on more and more debt. So it's deceptive because it's almost like negative growth. It's like, yeah, you're increasing, your money flowing through, but every month you're actually going more and more into debt. Is that kind of a way of understanding it? Yeah.

See, they would view that extra $10,000 a month that you're spending as economic growth because you're actually spending the money. The problem is, like, if you're a business owner, you've got your expenses and your income on your income statement, right? If expenses are greater than your income, you're going to go out of business. It's just the end result. So they view that as growth, where I view it as the death trap, because ultimately, people hit their max credit line, then they have to stop.

It's like, oh, now they've got these payments. We can't
make these payments, right? It's like, what do we do? So this is where we are when something is an oxymoron, meaning it absolutely doesn't make sense. The only people that believe an oxymoron to be true are morons, right?

And they're the ones that are writing it. They're the ones that are writing these laws of these oxymorons, and they're the only ones that believe. So let's paint this picture with a story, because I think everybody who has college age kids is going to realize, oh, my word, kirk's telling the truth on this. So in this article, they call it the Tale of the Drunken Stupid, right? So I'm going to embellish it a little bit for story's sake.

So let's just say, Seth, that you are a frat boy. You're in college and you're in this frat house, and everybody else in the frat house is also a frat boy. Well, frat boys have dads that give them credit cards to use in college, right? So if you're living in this frat house and you've got Daddy's credit card, what's the first thing that you're going to buy? It's like, oh, guys, let's build a bar in the house, and then let's stock that bar with top shelf liquor.

It's like, we're going to have parties every night, and so we can't just have that. Let's get the biggest giant screen TV screen that we can, but we're going to have to have a big party couch to sit on. And so they start spending all this money and live this party lifestyle. And what's the end result? The end result is they're in college to learn, right, and their grades, because they're not focusing on school.

Go from A to B to C to D to F. Dad's seeing the report cards, and he calls up, son, I'm cutting you off from your credit card. You're wasting all of my money parting it up, not studying. I paid for your college. I'm paying for the stupid lifestyle.

And now you're getting f's. No more credit card for you. And every other dad in the frat house starts to do the same thing over time. So now apply that to Washington, DC. DC.

Is the frat boy. The dad's credit card is the printing press, right? So people in DC. Are just spending all this money, all this frivolous money, stimulus, raising the debt ceiling, doing all this garbage. And now Daddy's credit card has run out because of what happened during the BRICS meeting.

And Putin and G saying, we're taking away the petrodollar status of the US. Dollar. That foreign capital inflow ceases. It's the only way we've been able to amass $32 trillion worth of debt. And people still want our currency.

So now that that's going away, we're going to be forced to print money like there's no tomorrow to keep the lifestyle up. And so how do they slow down? That inflation. They raise interest rates, right? And so this is.

Where you're starting to see the yield on sovereign debt rise across the globe. Because Daddy's credit card has been cut off, the credit limits have been reached, and now the only thing that comes, how do you fix it? Right? So how do you fix a declining economy? It's not with stimulus money.

It's with people working, people spending. Right? Because debt based growth is not growth. That's an oxymoron. Growth only comes from people spending their own money.

So you need to have a bigger boat, right? So to stay afloat in this economy, you need to have a bigger boat where there's more people working, more people spending. That means more income tax revenues, more sales tax revenues, more property tax revenues. The government revenue streams will go up with a bigger boat. Without a bigger boat, the economy sinks.

The whole boat sinks. Right. So the policies that we're seeing right now, rising taxes, rising interest rates and wage reduction, which that TikTok video that you showed proved wage reduction is there. Don't believe what the Biden administration is telling you. When a house what was the average price of a house?

Back in the early 19 hundreds, you said it was like, I think I have it up right here. Yeah. So the average price yeah. So the average yearly income was 1300. The average house cost was 3900.

So three times the amount of average income. Whereas now the average house is eight times the average income. Yes. So people are running out of income. Wages, obviously, have been coming down not just this year, but for decades as inflationary pressures have persisted.

Now, you can hide that for a bit until you max out your credit line, right? Like what you explained, once you hit your credit line, it's all unmasked. And that's what we're seeing right now, which is why this rising yield and rising GDP is actually, to me, the sure sign of the death of the dollar as we know it. It's the slow death of the US economy. And I don't even think it's going to be that slow.

I think it's going to accelerate. And so here's where we now start to hit a dilemma. So throughout history, and I know that you're a student of history just like I am, I love it. I love historical stuff. So always following an economic collapse is social collapse.

It always follows it 100% of the time. So you look at what happened in France four months ago or so, when France you've got all these socialist people in France, in socialist country France, that paid excess taxes their whole life because it's a socialist country for them to take care of them during retirement. So what did France do? Macron said, hey, we kind of ran out of money. Sorry, everybody, we're going to raise your retirement age.

You can't actually retire for a few more years. People started to revolt. Blood in the streets, right? Riots, protests. I mean, nothing against old people.

I've got a gray beard, right? But 70, 80 year old people in the streets were being knocked down by cops because they were just protesting. It's like we're socialists living in a socialist country and paid higher taxes and we want our retirement. It's all that they were asking for and the government took it away because they ran out of money. Well, what comes next?

What comes next after they raise the retirement age is what happened in Cyprus and Greece way back in the day and what happened in Argentina and Venezuela. Then you have other austerity measures like reducing benefits while increasing the retirement age. Anything that the government can do to save money, right? So what happens is you saw the social chaos happen there. Washington DC.

This week I saw this article and I thought it was an article about the hurricane that just blew through Florida, right. All the shelves were and then I read it's like, wait, this has nothing to do with the hurricane. This is in DC. Basically, Giant Foods, which is like a grocery store, like or, you know, Piggly Wiggly or whatever, right? Large grocery store chain in the mid Atlantic.

They basically are taking all the brand name stuff off the shelves and replacing it with generic store brand stuff, hoping that not everybody's going to steal it because people are stealing the name brand stuff. So here's where in social decay, this is kind of the ugly reflection of humanity, right? Where something that's unethical and immoral, like stealing becomes a higher order than a morality thing. How do I explain it? If you're forced with feeding your family or not, even stealing becomes an ethical decision, right?

So it's this higher order of morality even though it's wrong, it's like, should I steal because I don't want my family to starve? Yeah, I think I'm going to do it because I don't want my family to starve. And people start justifying immoral, bad actions. Government officials are justifying stealing from us through all this increased inflationary pressures and printing money like there's no tomorrow to keep the thing afloat. Right.

Because they're not going to get voted back in if they don't. So what we're starting to see is the rise of social disarray. It starts with theft and burglaries and robberies in every big city around the country. You're seeing a rise in violent crime, muggings, lootings, death, right. Guns, stabs, I mean, everything.

It's starting to actually happen, which of course it's going to happen. It always follows economic chaos. Always 100% of the time. Doesn't matter how advanced or unadvanced the society is, it always follows it, right? So we're starting to go down that path and we're even now seeing it with politics, right?

So the social decay that we're seeing, look what Adam Schiff did last week. Actually earlier this week I saw the article has to do with J Six and Trump being arrested right? So he brought up section, Article 14, section three of the Constitution. It says anybody who's in part of an insurrection or aiding people or helping them, an insurrection can never hold public office, right? So this is going to go to the Supreme Court because now there's states that are saying we're not going to put Trump on the 2024 election on the ballots, right?

So imagine, just imagine this, the massive front runner on the GOP possibly not being able to run, right, because the states won't put them on the ballot. And so this is going to go to the Supreme Court. What if the Supreme Court says, yeah, Trump, you can't run? What's that going to do to social chaos in this country? It's going to be wild.

I'm not trying to be a prophet. I'm just saying I don't care if you're on the left or the right when your front runner says we can't run. And based on Adam Schiff's own words in that article that you have on the screen, he said the Constitution doesn't say you have to be convicted of the crime. It just says that you have to be part of it, right, to not hold public office. So it's like what, anybody anywhere can make up anything about anybody and what they're saying is the rule of law in America doesn't exist anymore and you are guilty until proven innocent, right?

And so that to me is evidence of social
decay and what's happening, and it all comes from economic collapse. What we're seeing right now is a function of biden's economy. And it was Bill Clinton that said it really, really well, it's the economy, stupid, right? People vote with their wallets, right? And if the economy stinks, this is why you're going to distract.

This is why when the BRICS meeting was happening and I was surfing through the channels looking for news on the internet anywhere, nobody was covering the most important economic news story of a century. Literally. It's the changing of the guard. It's the paradigm pendulum shifting moment of moving power from the west to the east and removing the US dollar's reserve currency status. That's what it was.

But what was everyone focused on? Trump's mug shot. It's like, well, I don't care about the mug shot. I don't care how he looked. I do care that the irrational reasoning of why he had to have a mug shot, right?

I mean, that's bogus garbage. Or they were concerned about counterfeit Taylor Swift tickets during her concert tour or all this other dumb know, just deflecting from the important to the meaningless and keeping people's eyes off of what's really truly important, right? So you add all of this up, we've got economic collapse, societal collapse, and we are going to be in a dark period for a bit. I mean, we just are, because you don't come through these things real quickly. But there is light at the end of the tunnel, right?

This is why I can have a smile on my face. Why you can? Because financially, there's solutions. We've been talking about it for a long time. Gold and silver doing very well.

We talked about how it maintains its purchasing power over time. That's another added element. We talked about how it gets you out of the Central Bank digital currency system. So you're no longer a digital slave in their digital world, where they can cut you off from buying or selling because it's a tangible asset that you take delivery of. Doesn't have title, there's no property taxes on it, right?

Like a house, which is a tangible asset. But you don't really own a house even when you own it. Just try not paying your property taxes and see what happens, right? They'll sell it in a tax lien auction, right? So gold and silver, there's no title to it.

It's like a bearer bond. If you have it, it's yours. Kind of a deal. And you could use it for barter in a worst case scenario. I know that you're very much a preparedness guy, right?

Because people need food storage, food. They should have silver, they should have their own garden. They should be able to self sustain in an economic crisis. I don't care if it's a hurricane blowing through town, tornado, economic collapse, you lose your job and you just can't afford to live for a bit, right? It would be really good if you were prepared for things like that coming up.

What I'm talking about is going to be more of a prolonged contraction of the economy. And people just need to decide now how to overcome and actually thrive during those time frames that I think that we're going to be in. But when you are, that will put a smile on your face. Because you're going to be able to not just survive, but thrive with the growth that we're seeing in metals. The ability to put food on the table for your families, right?

Because here's what comes after this chaos and collapse. And again, not trying to be a prophet, it's just human nature, right, is during times of cris, people will give up their freedoms. So you have this crisis that's so bad and people can't feed the families and they've resorted to stealing to feed their families. Right? I mean, that's what we're seeing already.

What's the carrot that the Central Bank digital currencies are going to use? I think it's going to be universal basic income, saying you take our CBD system and you'll have $1,000 a month in credits and debits and credits coming into your account every month, just take it. It's like, don't take it. It's your ultimate loss of freedom and privacy ever. But they're going to make it really difficult for you to want to say no.

Right? But if you have something where you can afford to say no because you're prepared, then it doesn't matter. And that's how you can have a smile on your face, even though our freedoms are eroding all around us. Well, one interesting point is that say you're in a bind. The thing with, say, silver, for instance, say you've got 30oz of silver and you need some quick money.

It's something that even locally, you can go find there's coin shops, there's different kinds of gold buyers. So even if you have to in a pinch, it's like it becomes that last resort where you pull out a few coins, you go some maybe you might lose a few percentage points in that sale, but it's liquid, it converts. You'll find any number of those people that they say, hey, do you buy generic rounds? They'll say, yeah, it's like, what are you paying? We pay Spot, or whatever it is.

And it's like, oh, okay. So it's not like it's some asset, like, say you're investing in a painting or a stock or something where if you want to pull your money out of that, it's a complicated process. So just a thing to kind of put out there. And what I suspect is that as things get worse and worse, you're going to have people that start opening up more businesses that are actually buying precious metals and converting them and trading them and authenticating. That was my old business, is I've had people come in, they'd be like, hey, I need money.

My dad left me here's 400oz of silver. So I'd look at it, I'd test it, and I'd say, okay, well, here's a check or here's cash. Right? So it's interesting how it's just interesting looking at that video about life in 1930 and life now, because like I said, I'd always heard the suit analogy. Like you could buy a whole suit for a single gold coin.

How it's the same. It's just interesting to look at trace these currencies and the role of different currencies in bartering and trading over the course of history. Yeah, it is what people do. Where there's a will, there's a way, right? And if you can't survive and feed your family.

Basically, mom and pops merchants don't want the currency anymore for whole host of ideological reasons, financial reasons, whatever. You better have something that you can barter with and trade with to feed your family until things transition out of that phase and we get back to a sense of normalcy again. Normalcy always comes, right? But it might be a while. It might be a while.

And this is why we're protecting and preserving and thriving right now with silver. And it reminds me of there's a story that I heard is either Argentina or Venezuela, that after the collapse and after the currency had collapsed, people were lining up with wheelbarrows full of cash to buy a like, that's how bad the hyperinflation was. Yet a single ounce of silver would feed a family for about a month. So to me, that's the contrast of what happened. So, anyway, kirk, I know we're kind of past time for you, but just quickly, before you send off folks, if you want to get a hold of kirk or his company, give them a call.

720-605-3900 to speak to an advisor there. Or go to goldwithseth.com, fill out the form below, and one of his advisors will contact you. And that information is in the description as well. So, Kirk, as usual, thank you so much for coming on the show. I always enjoy these conversations.

I can't wait till I have the studio set up for the in person, because I'd love to have you come and spend 3 hours or more just sitting and talking. So thank you for coming on. Yep, I can't wait. That'd be awesome. Well, we'll talk to you soon.

All right. Thank you, Kirk.

WACKY WOO WITH CLIF HIGH JSNIP4 & Jean-Claude – 08-30-2023

WACKY WOO WITH CLIF HIGH JSNIP4 & Jean-Claude - 08-30-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The transcript captures a detailed conversation, likely from a podcast or video broadcast. The dialogue kicks off with Joe, one of the speakers, discussing technical challenges he encountered, particularly with his headphones and browser settings. He narrates a recent incident where his headphones malfunctioned, and he had to switch browsers to get things working, hinting at the unpredictable nature of technology.

The conversation then pivots to more pressing concerns: an impending tropical storm in Florida. The unpredictability of weather forecasts is a central theme, with both speakers expressing skepticism about the media's tendency to sensationalize such events. Joe shares his personal preparations for the storm, notably his purchase of a fuel trailer. This anecdote serves as a springboard for a broader discussion on the reliability of weather predictions and the media's potential role in inciting undue panic among the public.

As the dialogue progresses, the topic shifts to the political realm and current events. The speakers mention that their broadcast is being simulcast on both YouTube and Rumble, indicating the multimedia nature of their platform. The conversation touches on political figures, with Trump being a focal point. They delve into the potential implications of certain mugshots and speculate on the symbolism behind them. The mystery surrounding Epstein's death is also broached, with Trump's perspective on the matter being highlighted. This segment of the conversation underscores a recurring theme of the transcript: skepticism towards mainstream narratives. The speakers frequently challenge the information presented to the public, advocating for critical thinking and independent analysis.

Towards the end of the transcript, there's palpable anticipation for a special guest's appearance. This hints at the dynamic nature of the show and its potential to cover a diverse range of topics. The conversation seamlessly blends personal anecdotes, current events, and political commentary, offering a comprehensive insight into the speakers' perspectives on various issues. The dialogue encapsulates a mix of light-hearted banter, serious discussion, and critical analysis, reflecting the multifaceted nature of contemporary discourse.

#Joe #TechnicalIssues #Headphones #Browser #TropicalStorm #Florida #WeatherForecast #Media #FuelTrailer #Preparation #Hurricane #CNN #FakeNews #Weatherman #Gas #Rain #HurricaneSeason #YouTube #Rumble #Trump #Mugshot #Indictments #Silver #HunterBiden #Epstein

WACKY WOO WITH CLIF HIGH JSNIP4 & Jean-Claude - 08-30-2023

Forward to his second channel. Joe, welcome back to the show. How are you, man? Good, man. You know, it's funny, I went I just did a video earlier today in my computer room, or was I think, I think one of the videos was in the computer room.

Everything's fine, you know, whatever. I go to log into this thing and it's like turn my headphones on and huh, I don't hear nothing. So I'm testing them. Trouble shooting, not working. It's just a little Bluetooth connector that plugs into the USB port.

It's been there forever and all of a sudden my headphones won't work at all. I'm like, son of a gun. So I go, well I'll just stick it on speakers, regular speakers, and I go into the StreamYard thing settings and there's no option, it sees nothing else. And I go. What?

So I just came up here, laptop, and I'm using Mozilla Firefox as my browser down there and up here, and it's the same thing. I go, there's only the headset. Where's the headset for speakers? There's nothing for speakers. I go, what the hell?

So I open up Microsoft Edge, which I never really like using, and all of a sudden it works and I got all my stuff. So I go, okay, well maybe there's an update to the browser that screwed things up. I don't know. Well, you know, first of all, we're in a Mercury retrograde, so this is absolutely normal to have technical issues just before the show and a bunch of people are saying, come on guys, JC. I'm like, we'll do a show when we can hear Joe.

Otherwise, yeah, it's my stupid so well, thanks Joe, for joining me tonight. It is the wacky woo and I'm told it could get really fucking wacky and maybe a few minutes from now, so we'll see guys. Stay tuned for that. I'm not sure if we're going to be able to pull this off, but if so you're going to want to stay here for a little bit longer on this. Yeah, we might, yeah.

You're going to if this guest comes in, I was going to say it might be one for the history books. It could be. Okay, Joe, we just lost your feed. Okay, there you go. I've got your crypto background there.

Okay, Joe, so we're simulcasting right now on both YouTube channel, yours and mine here, and also triple casting actually, on Rumble. I want to spend the first maybe five or ten minutes here on YouTube to chat with your audience and mine here. And then we're going to move over to the Rumble feed for the no holes barred conversation. I'm just going to bring in the live chat now here on both our YouTube the link, guys, if you want to click on that and start joining us here in the Rumble feed so you don't have to switch over later. So while we're here on YouTube, you did a video earlier today, Joe, talking about your preparations here with your generator and your new is it propane?

No, it's a diesel tank that you've just installed here. And of course, this is in preparation for this tropical storm that might turn into a hurricane. Share that with the audience members here. What's happening in Florida? Do you guys think it's manmade?

Is it part of the weather warfare? What do you guys think? Yeah, I mean, these days you just don't even know anymore. As far as that. I mean, regardless, there's a storm coming.

Tropical storms can be hurricane. And of course, if you type in Hurricane Florida, the first thing you see in Google is CNN and the fake news media. This is going to be a monster. It's a big storm. It's going to rapidly change as it goes back, whatever.

Maybe it will, maybe it won't. No one ever knows. But the news channel, they just love to just pump the fear. But again, it could be big. It could turn into a larger one.

But it's like the weatherman 100% chance, no rain, and all of a sudden it's freaking raining over your house for 2 hours after you've booked ten guys to come and paint your garage. Right? Oh, for sure. Yeah. Painting nonetheless, right?

Yeah, exactly, right. Or guys that come cut your yard run. It's porn.

I don't even know why I looked a while back. It was a while back, and maybe it was just a little intuition.

And I mean, a while back, as in weeks and weeks ago, I was like, I wonder if there's any fuel trailers for sale. And I look online on Craigslist, Tampa Craigslist, and I see this nice brand new 200 gallon. They even have a 500 or something gallon. But I'm like, Jesus, I don't need that. And it was like, do I really want to spend that money right now for this?

Do I really need that? And I never even thought, well, why are you even thinking about this? This is weeks and weeks and weeks ago. There's no need for me. Everything's fine.

And then this thing starts coming up, and I'm reminded again, hey, I wonder if that thing's still for sale. So I call, yes, it's for sale. I'm like, all right, give me the exact price. I'll go to the bank and get a certified check and just I got to go home and get my truck, and then I'll come back and get it. So he did.

I got everything, went and picked it up, brought it home, filled it up at the gas station. I think I said in the video, you got this 20 something year old kid in there, can't count, can't even use his phone. I'm assuming he was using his phone to $4.40 times 100 and 7575 gallons equals but he was like, picked it up. I see him typing it, so I'm like, well, that's what he's doing. And I'm okay with that because I didn't bring my phone.

And I don't know exactly what that equals either. $4.40 times 175. And I'm like, by the way, it doesn't have to be perfect. You can kind of eyeball it just whatever roughly it equals. And he's messing with his phone.

I'm like, okay, he's trying to figure it out. And then he puts his phone down and he's like, 80 maybe. 80 something. I wasn't sure what he was saying. I didn't know what that was in response to.

What are you talking about? 80 what? I'm like, 80 what? $80, I go for 175 gallons of gas. And he's like, I was just kind of thinking I was just trying to do it math in my head.

175 gallons for $80? Where do I sign up for that? I was going to say anybody else but you would have said, Deal, son, here's the $80. Yeah, it's like, what? Sixty cents a gallon or something, or a little more or whatever.

But it's like, wow. Again, you get that everywhere. Your gut feeling right now for Florida, what's happening? We'll get into the Maui thing here a little bit later on, on Rumble. Some people were suggesting that maybe what's happening right now is kind of like to prevent or to preempt another type of Maui happening in Florida.

Is that your take? Yeah, because the thing is, when you got these hurricanes, they have what might be called the outer bands, if you will. And sometimes those outer bands really extend farther than what they consider the outer bands. And it's simply clouds, rain clouds. Almost all of Florida is going to probably get wet sometime or another from this storm.

Even if you got no wind from yeah, because of the mean is it possible? Yeah, that the thing's. Dumping all know, and now you're going to have a wet. Soggy Florida but of course my argument would be, okay, well, as soon as it dries up in, say, a week. But here's the thing.

Let me back up. I was thinking, I don't know who somebody for helicopter ride. This is a while back, like maybe early this year, maybe last year. I think it was last year, actually. It was last year.

And we'd already had a storm. Remember that storms that came through last year? People were concerned for me, but I was like, yeah, it hit way down south, sarasota and all that. So that storm, know, water up here, but it didn't really affect us. It was a little windy outside, nothing major, no big deal.

And we had power outage up here, though, for like three days, I think. And it was because a branch had hit a thing out. I don't know what they're called, but it's a thing on the power line. And you can use a special pole that they have and you click it back into place. It's like a circuit breaker, essentially.

And then everything's good, so it just took them three days to come out here and do that, so it wasn't like a major thing. So we got some rain, we got some rain. My front yard did not flood this time. However, when I was flying the helicopter, I'm like, man, I'm looking down at all the farmland around here for miles and I'm like, oh. I was like, usually I'll go down in there and do some maneuvers and have a little fun with somebody I still could have, but it was like, wow, it's all flooded.

And I'm thinking that storm was how long ago? You're like, it's been six months and the ground is still like a bit saturated. So yeah, you know what, come to think of it, you might be able to start some fires in some areas if someone wanted to, but you're going to have a hard time getting that thing to spread when you have a scenario like that. So that's an interesting thing to say. However, again, it is time of the season, time of the year.

Storms come, happens all the time. We know they can bump them, move them, create them even, and now you just don't even know what's what. It's just here's one, prepare for it. So I'm prepared, we're prepared here. Good for you, man.

Joe, we're ten minutes in. Okay, so let me bring the link. I see a lot of people still watching us on YouTube. I want you guys to please come and join us over here on the rumble feed as we're about to terminate. Here the feed on both our YouTube, so let me bring that link back down here.

And so tonight guys, we're going to talk about trump this mugshot, the very specific encoding there of the three letters en D. We're going to start there tonight, we're going to get into what just happened with the ETF ruling here on Bitcoin. The spike that we see here today, what that perhaps spells for the rest of the month here. Going into 911, a lot of people are talking about a crash. We're going to try to decode all of that for you guys as well.

We're going to be looking at Silver. Cliff had it in his reports a couple of months ago that perhaps September of this year would be the year where Silver is first freely traded in our lifetimes. That's going to be a really cool conversation. We're going to get into the Maui fires and all that. And just generally speaking here the timeline perhaps of the Hunter Biden story that has been eluding us here for so long.

So it's going to be a lot of cool conversations, of course, can't have it here and maybe some election talk also. And again, people, we're pretty certain a very special guest is coming on and I'm not going to give any other hits because you're already thinking it's somebody and you might be right, but you might be wrong. You know what's funny, too? Just as we started the show, I was in Memphis the other day and somebody got me this beautiful mug. I couldn't find those here in Canada.

Anyways, so I brought it home and there was an article just earlier today about how this particular symbol is like a hate speech here in Canada. And I'm like, Wait a second, they said this. Have you heard the school thing? Right now they're kicking the twelve year old out of the school because he's got the patch of that on his backpack. But they're saying it represents slavery and hateness.

He goes, his mom's like, Wait a minute. This was because we were fighting the British to get our freedom, right? That's what this one is. You're thinking of another one. We're fighting against what I was told.

Oh, my God. Joe just a couple of years ago, the Canada flag was a hate symbol in Australia because people were flying it in solidarity with the freedom. So anyway, so I had to go double check. I'm like, am I drinking from a mug of a Ku Klux Klan? Am I doing something wrong?

Because I saw that. I think some of the people got the vaccination got it in their head, their effing head. It was their injection site. Oh, my God. Joe okay, so guys, let me bring that link back down one more time here for you guys on YouTube.

And yes, please come over and join us on Rumble. I'm just going to detach now both of the YouTube feeds here's. The first one that goes, yes, remove. And let's remove the second one here as well. Remove, remove.

All right, so, yes, let me drop this thing. Drop the needle on the record. Okay. Yes. We're live on Rumble.

Thank you so much, everyone, for joining us here. We're about 4300, watching Strong now and growing. Hopefully the rest of the people here from YouTube come and join us. Joe let me start here. Let me go backtrack here just a second to our favorite mug shot.

Now, there's a lot of debate on whether or not this is the actual typical. Police stations have faceboards flashes and lighting. It's not typically a sideways pose, but at any rate, let's move past that for a second here. What was interesting was election interference. Never surrender.

And Donald J. Trump. Now, in a lot of our decodes that you and I have looked at in the last couple of years, the first letters of each phrase mean something, and here it spells the word end. Joe let's start putting down some track here. What's the calm behind this message?

What's your gut feeling about the end? Is it the end of the road for the cabal? Is it the end for all of these crazy indictments and perhaps the start of unsealing some indictments for the other side of the fence? What do you think? Let's start laying down some track.

Joe right. So there was that do you have the post handy? I don't have a number right now. Off my head. No, I don't have it in front of me because it basically said something essentially like, get ready for justice to be served now.

And there was a thing there won't be five, only four, essentially, because we're not going to have five. So that means well, we're at four without saying it. If you say there's not five, then that means there's four. And we had four indictments and then end. So to me and again, me all over watching Antioch posting more than that son of a gun has been posting, like, recently.

He's out of control. Let me just for the audience members, I'll bring your video down. And in here you have some of these posts here. So let me bring that link down for the Rumble Chat guys. You guys can go check out that whole video there for more details.

Okay, keep going. Joe so you got Antioch posting out of control. Hey, get ready, because the things that be happening between day and night are going to be so much that you'd used to these things being happening over a period of a month or more like that big of an exciting headline kind of a thing. And that doesn't mean good or bad per se. It could be both, but in my eyes, it's going to probably be, oh, snap, some deep stater got taken out today.

Oh, snap, a big arrest happened today of so and so or some operation. They just showed it to us, like, holy crap, something huge happened. Oh, my God, Biden stepping down. Holy crap, Kamala's coming in. Oh, the Gavin knew something.

She's going to pick him. And then all of a sudden, they're all wiped out because none of them were legit. And just again, part of the show. And then Trump posts something. Was it today about enjoy the show or something about a movie something?

Movie super show something. Can I ask you something? Well, first of all, I'm assuming you did see the interview with Tucker Carlson and Mr. Trump a couple of times during the interview. I had to rewatch it to make sure he said what he said.

But he says, oh, I'm the president for everybody. Not just the Republicans. Also the Democrats. Right. But he kept saying, I'm the President, not I'm going to be, but I am.

So I thought that was interesting. But when he was asked about newsom, he says, oh, yeah, I get along with those guys. Right. So he was kind of suggesting here that perhaps people would be removed, that they're not supposed to be there. The Crooked Joe Biden family.

He didn't really speak well of DeSantis. We're seeing DeSantis being booed everywhere and saying, we want Trump. We want Trump. He's being heckled everywhere. He's going down really quickly.

Do you think Trump is also setting up maybe the possibility that Newsom would be a stand in here for Biden. He did suggest that Biden wouldn't probably make it till the next yeah, you heard him say, yeah, I don't think he's going to finish his term, blah, blah, blah. But I want to add something to that. One of the comments that stood out to me, because it was one of those, like, remember when he was talking about Hillary the gitmo in the old video? Yeah, we're having another court, we're expanding.

They want to shut it down. And I wanted to keep it going to put her in it. Remember that? The little whisper to put her in it or whatever, Hillary. So it was like under his breath.

This wasn't quite under his breath, but it was a little quiet and it was very fast when he replied. So Tucker's asking Trump, what do you think happened to Epstein? What happened with Epstein? Do you think he was killed or did he really kill himself? Or was he know?

And if you hear what he said, the very first answer was, oh, yeah, I think they killed him. And then he goes on to really start talking about what he thinks it could have been. But I go, Just listen to his very quick, the cameras were listening and the guards were all right, yeah, but he said that he was killed, not the whole hanging thing. So I go, okay, well, some of us were upset because like, well, trust justice isn't going to get done and this and that. So I don't know.

But that's what Trump said. He was killed. And here's the thing. Let's just assume Epstein did the old walk out the back door trick and we saw fake news, fake body, all this garbage they finally put out way later. If Trump said, oh, yeah, I think they killed know, and then it goes on to talk and then kind of slightly reverse what he just said, but it's like, nope, he already told you the answer right there.

Then that means they got him somewhere else, right? They got him anyways. Kind of like what I feel like those letters that they gave the Bush family at the funeral and everybody else, it was like a, we we're not buying your whole dad thing, by the way. We got him and he's going to pay for what he know. And then that's why Jeb Bush is like, I will never forget that reaction of that guy.

He could not handle it. I'm going to try to see if I can find the clip here where they're all opening their letters. But, yeah, that was hilarious. Even Hillary's like, yeah, they know whatever that letter said, every single one of them knew exactly what it meant, you know that much. Every one of them knew what it and then and then the know, Trump like a boss, sits down next to them all, hey, guys.

Hey, how's it going? Stay here while you guys open your letters. They're probably you motherfucker biggest troll ever. Yeah. Where's Jeb?

I want to find Jeb in all this. He's sitting on the other side of the aisle. Yeah, he was there. He is here. Yeah, it was around the time the body was the casket was, let's see.

Yeah, at the end, right? Yeah, it was. Let's see.

His wife right there goes over to Jeb and hands up like, hey, look at this. Jeb looked down, but if you look, which I know it's not there, but from what I remember, you look at him and then he looks back at his dad's body go by. Like if you look, he sees what he sees and then letter and then looks out towards his dad's casket. So was it something like, yeah, this whole fake death of your dad, let's assume that's what his, we got him over here and he's going to pay for what he did to JFK and blah, blah, blah. Because I got a sneaky suspicion you're going to hear George Bush Sr's name when Trump like he said, when I come back, I'm releasing it all.

We will find out what happened, I think, because again, he was sitting at the front of the book repository. I don't know where I was on that day. Well, you were right there, Mr. CIA agent, in front of the doorway. Right.

Let me ask you on that, just to be fair. Didn't Trump promise he was going to release all of that in his first term, then kind of tried and then the CIA or FBI, kind of like mitigated, you can't, don't do it. And he backed off and there's no telling why he did that. But yeah, he did say that. He did say he was going to do it.

Okay. No, because a lot of people said, oh, because a few people told me that, oh, see, he's going to do it. I'm like, oh, he kind of had the a chance to do it in the first term. I'm not trying to piss on anybody's parade. But then I know also this could have been a negotiating tactic for something.

That's right. He may have very well said. A bunch of people in the CIA are about to be in big trouble if he releases this. So he's going to use it as a bargaining chip, maybe for some of them to come clean, blow the whistle, become a whistleblower, get a lesser sentence kind of a thing, take out more rats in the sinking ship. I mean, there's no telling.

There's bigger things at play always. Exactly. It's just my opinion. I wish I was emptyos and I could say, no, dumb ass, here's what actually happened to myself. This is why he didn't do it.

The beauty of it is I don't think we're going to have to wait very long to know all I don't it seems like Tori keeps talking, March 4, March 4. She goes, you know, March 4 used to be the day that the president used to take office. But then when we went to the corporation, it all changed. She keeps talking about March 4 like, hey, wink, wink. This coming March 4 means something.

So is it possible? September October. Holy shit. Day and night, like Antio said, shit happens. Take down, takedown, takedown.

Congress is shut down. Dick algae thing, all that happens and then all of a sudden military comes in. Yes, Trump's going to be he's the rightful one to be in power at this time because of whatever the reason, blah, blah, blah. And March 4, he steps into the New Republic for all I know. I don't know, but she's been hitting around lately about it.

Pay attention to that date. I'll ask you about this a little bit later on. Of all the things that everything crazy shit I know, and guys go to crypto viewing there they have this 14 day free trial. There's no excuse anymore. If you really want interested in seeing all these remote viewing target hits that they've been doing, they're doing a lot of great work there.

Give it a try. I'm not getting any commission out of that. I'm just saying they do really good work. Yeah, I'll get back into that slide here in a moment. But just going back to Tucker Carlson.

Joe, I wanted to finish on this, so let me go back to the Trump speech here. He just announced a day or two ago, Tucker, that he's trying to set up this interview with Putin. Now, do you think that's going to happen? And if it does, let's go forward here. What the hell would that look like?

And why would the deep state be absolutely going batshit crazy right now if a real conversation could actually happen on Twitter for an hour like this uncensored between Tucker and Putin? Do you think that's in the from I wish I could from, oh, I got a hint, from Antios or Tory. And yeah, it's going to happen. Here's what I think. It's been pretty silent over there, but I still think it could happen.

And if it does, again, we saw how the platform on Twitter now is doing certain live streams that are getting a lot of mean. Again, even with that know, with Trump has been huge. But if Putin comes over and Tucker interviews him and asks him all kinds of crazy, for example, BioLab trafficking, like crazy shit, and Putin starts telling you his answers, it's like, hey, wait a minute, why we keep giving him Ukraine money? All these people are going to wake the F up. Look at this video right now.

262,000,000 views on this particular one. Imagine if Putin came in and let's say got 100 million views. It's a lot of a speech that for all intents and purposes, it looks like the cabal doesn't manage Putin. They don't manage to hooker. They don't manage the Twitter platform, just like in this interview here.

How much damage did that do? Just this particular video alone to legacy media. Imagine if Putin had his opportunity to say his side of the story here. And even if he lands 5% or 10% of his agreements, and I'm not saying I agree with Putin here on everything, right? But let's say he lands five the big ones, and they're in stark opposition to what CNN and the rest of the mainstream news have been lying to us for the last couple of years.

Imagine the AHA moment for a lot of people, not just us. We'd be shocked too, I'm sure, but imagine the normies. Since we're talking about just I thought, oh, I should just mention this as a possible Jsip Woo woo hit. That may happen. I got a dream last night, I think, or the night before, maybe the night before that.

I was in like a town square in Russia. Major city, major town square kind of environment. People are shopping, eating restaurants, stuff people are outside know, it felt like it was daylight. And three, what I felt were like American type men came in with weapons and started shooting at people. And so we're all running, including myself, we're all running to get away.

And then I went into this restaurant and ate with these nice ladies. Actually, one of them could speak English, and we ate, and they actually had Greek food there. I go, what the hell? Greek food in Russia? I'll take a damn euro.

Give me a euro. So I just thought about it after I woke up, and I'm like, it doesn't have to necessarily be three American men. It could be represented. Other three Ukrainian guys got in and caused this. And then I realized, oh, this is why they would do that.

In my opinion, to cause the citizens of Russia to force their leader to stop messing with Ukraine. Do you see what just happened now? The terrorists are coming into Russia. They're attacking us because you invaded Ukraine. So they're trying to get the citizens riled up to stop Putin.

Do you think the Widener Group leader is actually dead? This plane crashed from last week. Your gut feeling? Or did they know? Give him a facial reconstruction and move him to an island somewhere.

Exit stage left. What do you think happened? Mean, you know he wasn't friendly to Putin, right? This was the opposite. So I'm thinking that he may have went bye bye, like a real life kind of a thing.

See, someone's texting me, but no problem, there's somebody in the chat. Oh, they must be confused, because you're like, this is supposed to be the Woo Woo dude video. No, actually, this is called the Deep Woo. And it's called the Wacky Woo with Jason Ford JC. This is on my channel, and I invite a.

Whole bunch of different people on the show. So just in case you're new to this no, and I never said I didn't say any to anybody yet. I didn't ask him. And I just said to me, JC, let's just do and I invite a bunch of people on this show, on this platform. It's fun to have different points of views, but sometimes there's so much to go through.

I'm like, Joe, like, you and I could do this alone. We could talk for 2 hours and still yeah, so it's fun to shoot the shit with my budy, but this third party was kind of a hey, okay, you know what? There should be three of us, maybe. I don't know. Guys, stay tuned.

We'll see where it goes from here. So Wagner group, we don't know. I'm 50 50. But Sarah and I were at a restaurant this weekend and we talked to a Ukrainian person who hasn't been here for a long time. And they were like, that guy was exited, but he's not dead.

So I'm like, okay, it's coming from a Ukrainian who kind of had well, he had our point of view on the whole situation. At first, giving the mainstream news responses, I was looking at him like, Nah, dude, this blah, blah, blah. And as soon as I said a few words and they understood that we're not the typical brainwashed mainstream news kind of viewing people, he's like, oh, finally, okay, you guys understand? And then he's going on about the biolabs and all this stuff. I was like, wow, okay, a lot came out there.

Anyway, I thought that was interesting. It is possible he exited. Did he make a deal? Did he become a whistleblower? You just don't know.

Yeah, well, look, but the plane's on fire. Yeah, effing thing went up on autopilot or something. No, but JC for sure it's him because they did a DNA test to confirm. Okay, right. And who told you that?

The same people telling okay, I'm trying to figure out some things here because if we're getting for our guests, I don't want to get too ahead of myself. Let's get into this. Well, I think you and I haven't really talked about it since the last time you were on XRP, the SEC's decision where it goes from here. Do you and you're either on your Patreon group or with Woo woo, dude, are you repositioning your targets for XRP? Are your old predictions still true now that finally it's out of troubled waters?

As Janine kept pulling cards on this all like, no, it's like it's already done. It's just not been announced yet. Now we have the reality that it is out of troubled waters. Are we still seeing those handshakes, those golden credit cards, those swap deals that you guys were talking about maybe almost two years ago now? Joe, where are you?

And we will do it on XRP. Yeah, I haven't seen anything that's leading me to believe we're okay. It's time to skyrocket everything, including XRP. I'm still like, no, I got a dream of bitcoin near around $40,000 and gigantic red ice cream cone or pinkish ice cream cone, lick your ice cream. Meaning probably a big drop is going to happen after that for all the market.

So my thoughts are the bitcoin looked for around forty k, and it's going to drop after that. And I'm thinking that that drop might be all hell's breaking loose and okay. Again, under biden, markets are falling, failing, et cetera. Doesn't mean it has to happen in September here with other crazy things that we think are going to happen politically and whatnot. But I'm thinking we do maybe run up hopefully in September, hit the target, sell it, like I say, sell in May and go away.

Well, this is maybe sell in September and go away. Hold on, hold on. Don't confabulate it. Are you talking about bitcoin now or XRP? I want to finish on XRP.

Everything okay. I don't see anything happening with XRP. In my view, that's going to make it go do something that the rest of the market's not going to do, not yet. All that stuff that all the countries using it, blah, blah, blah. I think we've got a ways to go still for that to really come into fruition where that thing's really going to start rising.

I think we have to again have bitcoin around 40k. Everything crashes, and maybe that's when we get our 20 cent XRP in 1213 thousand bitcoin and god, $408 ethereum. And then you load the boat on whatever you choose at that time. And then we start going up and it'll probably be sometime later in the cycle, the bull cycle, that okay. XRP, blah, blah, blah.

Here's the news story. And then, wow, XRP is really going and maybe it will deg from the rest of the market because of the news or whatever happens, but I'm just not feeling like that's going to happen anytime soon. And Wujit hasn't said anything in particular time wise either about okay, I think we have a guest knocking at the door. You guys will recognize his work here. You can find him, of course, on his substac.

It's none other than Mr. Old. Also here on Twitter. He was just reinstated yesterday after being put in the doghouse again, and of course, on his shoot. Mr.

Cliffhei, welcome back to the show. How are you, sir? Hey, guy, I think I'm okay. I can barely hear you. I've got to get my it's a Mercury retrograde.

We had some issues with Joe's microphone earlier in the show also. We hear you fine, though. Okay, all right, then I may ask you to repeat until I figure out how to turn these new headphones up. Oh, there we go. Okay, we're good.

Damn, did it work? We can still hear you fine, Cliff. All right. Okay, you're coming up loud and clear. Cliff, first of all, thank you so much for coming on.

Really appreciate you taking the time. I have a gazillion questions for you, I'm sure the audience do, but before we look at any of those, I know you've been hard at work here for the last couple of months. You're putting a lot of amazing information on your substac and recently again here on your BitChute. What do you think is important right now that's coming up on your radar that you think is absolutely crucial to share with the audience members here tonight? I'll let you to microphone here and lay down some track as much as you can.

Cliff, go ahead. Geez. Well, see, here's the thing. Okay, so the question is tricky.

I'm going to have to turn this down. I'm hearing myself in an echo. I'll Mute Joe and myself also here. No, there we go. Can you hear me?

Okay. All right, so I usually live two years out, okay? So I'm more concerned personally right now with stuff that will be manifesting in two years than I am in the stuff that's manifesting now because it's running to track. Right? So that question is kind of it could be a little dangerous to reply.

People really need to be paying attention to weird stuff like this upcoming, which we're in it now, but we're going to cross a threshold hyper novelty period, right? It's going to really get people really wacky. But beyond that, people need to be paying attention to the moon and what the people who live there are doing with it now. Okay, but I think that's two years out for everybody else. But I'm worried about it now.

Makes sense.

Yes, it does. I'm looking for your tweet here about novelty. Explain to the audience what you mean by that in your old web audit reports. Of course, we're talking about Sci-Fi world entering Sci-Fi world. We're talking about these changing of the ages here in the yugas.

Explain that a little bit to audience members here so they're not caught flat footed with all of this big innovation that's going to come in part as a result here of the death of the dollar and also this amrev two that we are currently, okay? Those are both symptoms of a same cause. And it's such a wacky cause, no one's paying attention to it at all. But our galaxy is like shaped like this with a bunch of spiral arms on it, right? And there's like seven of these things fading off into dust.

We're out here on the end of a third excuse me, we're on the end of a third minor spiral arm. But from our perspective and so all the really cool shit's happening in Galactic Center now that is a source of millions of suns, okay? So you know what it's like with that one scary ball in our sky. Imagine having a planet anywhere close to that millions of suns and all that radiation. Okay?

So I've been studying this particular science that a lot of the Yogis studied on the last downward cycle of the transition of the ages. But from our perspective, we're out right here. But from our perspective, the galaxy looks like this. We're out here, and we're looking in towards Galactic Center. We're going to see like a bubble effect of all of those billions of suns in there radiating out all this galactic energy, right?

Okay. But from our perspective, this area right here obscures most of that radiation to us for some period of time that we call the Kali Yuga. It's about 2400 years. And that ended in the 17 hundreds actually ended in 1698, I believe, so two years before it's marked on the chart there. But from our perspective, what happens is this.

We're out here going, we don't travel around this in a straight circle. We travel around it in a sinusoidal wave that goes all the way around that circle. So from our perspective, hanging around out here, we rise and then fall relative to these emanations from either side of the galactic plane. Makes sense. Okay, so we're in a period right now where we're rising against this galactic plane in a sinusoidal arc that is bringing us more of this radiation from the Galactic Center and it's energizing our whole system, all of our environment, the beings, every damn thing, chemistry, all of this kind of stuff, right?

And so if you read into the science of yoga in terms of the science of it, that goes back into this previous age. So we're in what's known now as a Bronze Age or Dwapara Yuga, and we just left a Kali Yuga period. Now, we're right here in this little band down here, but up in this area is actually the Golden Age. And that's when we're exposed to maximum effect from the Galactic Center. And so it truly could be that in that period of time because there's so much radiation coming out of galactic center that's hitting our solar system because we're so high up on one of these arcs here getting that radiation that we might have humans live 250 years, no problem.

All different kinds of strange effects, right, that we're just not prepared for, many of which are alluded to our ancient history, right? And that just comes down to us. And we think it should happen to us now, but it can't because it should have happened only in the Golden Age or the Silver Age. And we're just in the Bronze Age a little bit. We're just out of the shit years, right?

Those 2400 kali yuga years. Can't hear a word, dude. Okay, I'm back on now. Interestingly enough, Cliff, a lot of our researcher here on alternative media were looking at this COVID narrative over the last number of years as a mechanism to shove us into this new digital world. The digital ID the digital dollar in order to perpetuate their systems.

Now we're seeing that there might have been another, maybe higher target in all of that. Looking at your chart there. They might have been attacking humans at the vagus nerve system level in order to prevent what you're describing there happens to humans. Explain that to the audience members so they know there's another piece of the puzzle there as well. Okay?

So human vagus nervous system is if you were to just extract it out of the human and lay it out, it's bigger than most of the very large multichannel Yaggy antennas. So it would spread out like half of a parachute or something. It's very large and it is an antenna. And nominally we have twelve, but there are some people that claim we have 13 cranial nerves, okay? These are big nerves that come up into the brain through the connection of the head into the spine and the spinal bone structures, right, that house the central nervous system that goes down through there.

There's other nerves that go out and around at various junctions through all of the vertebrae and so on. And without getting into any of the details, too much cranial nerve number ten is wired on one end to your central third eye, your pineal gland. And it's wired through a complex of nerves, not a single attachment. So it attaches at that point to the pineal gland in a very interesting bus bar kind of an arrangement, a wide spectrum information flow kind of thing, right? Not a single channel that's important in a detailed sense later on, but later on, that same nerve system connects to all of the other glands in your head thyroid, parathyroid, salivary glands, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

And it then goes in to connect to the vagus nervous system, which is, as I say, that very large nervous system that connects all the other organs. And we have a shielded nervous system. It has antiradiation shield over our vagus nervous system. Reptiles don't. Okay?

So you can do things to a reptile that really wouldn't affect humans at all. There used to be this video out there of these kids who took the gun part out of an Amana radar range, the microwave generator, and they were out somewhere, I think it was Texas or someplace. And dangerous for them. They were interesting, but it and they were operating without shielding and just aiming it in a general fashion at all these lizards that were on the desert floor. And the lizards are just flopping around and twitching and stuff.

They're not actually being fried by the microwaves. What's happening was their unshielded vagus nervous systems were being activated throughout their entire body. And they don't have very much of one anyway, right? But it's just to show the point. And everything was happening.

The fluids were spewing out of any orifice they were just bouncing around like they had some kind of mechanism in them, so it can happen. Now, humans have a shielded nervous system. That's why under the same exposure to those kind of rays, your skin would burn and you would feel bad, and you'd probably have a hell of a headache later on, but you would not have that immediate effect of total disjointed connection between brain and body. Right. But anyway, because we have that antenna array in the form of the vagus nervous system, we become susceptible to the rays that come and peek over this mass of the central part of the galaxy as we rise up into the Golden Age.

And as I say, imagine the Golden Ages quite a few thousand years from now. So none of us are probably going to see it, right? Not in these corporeal forms, but it's got to be pretty spectacular. But to be clear for the audience members, we're susceptible in a good way. It brings higher abilities, higher telepathy, which also brings us into harm's way, perhaps for some of those ETS recruiting, those specific skills.

Okay, but this is also what to your point about the guys trying to do all of their Babylonian money magic and all of this kind of stuff to keep us back into Kaliyuga, because that's where they have a power. As we become more advanced and get more in tune with stuff, they lose that power. Interestingly enough, the CDC just admitted a couple of days ago that the Spike protein is being found causing damage to the vagus nerve system. You were talking about that just a couple of months ago, even before this came out. So kudos.

Doesn't that just try to block that? Again, another point. Yep. Anything to keep us basically dumb and divided, right? As Hillary Clinton said.

There you go. And are these people our masters, the elites? Are they the masters or are they someone else's know? And there's still the issue of the aliens on the moon, right? Right.

Nobody's up there trucking around and dropping landers on the lunar equator anywhere. Noticed where we had to go with the Hindu landing way down in the South Pole, right? Right. I'm going to have Bruce Cesal on the show next week, or in two weeks. We're going to get into some of the footage.

Also there cliff. A few people in the chat are saying, yeah, Cliff is the bomb. Yeah, absolutely. Just very quickly, as we're into this subject matter, I wanted to go back to that cranial nerve number ten or X cliff. Does that relate, correct me if I'm wrong, maybe ten or 15 years ago, I forget, honey, whose shows you talked about this, but you talked about an old friend, maybe from Russia or Ukraine that was Smelting Silver, and it had something to do with the cranial nerve, that X nerve.

What was the story behind Silver? Why is that nerve so important? And how does it attach? Here to perhaps what you're talking about here, the vagus nerve system, and perhaps why we're being recruited by some of these off worlders. Okay, so silver is a peculiar metal in a couple of different ways.

Gold is unique chemically because of its inertness. Silver is precious because of its dynamism. What can be done through it dynamically with magnetism and so on. Silver also can be used just as a lump of the stuff. So if you're in a situation where you were like using an old TV and you had a bad TV antenna, you can just literally take a silver coin and tape it to that antenna and boost that performance all through the roof.

Right? And so that happens when you have silver. So talisman so what was that god's name? I can't think of his name has A-J-U-A-N in it. I think a Hindu god was always flinging things with these vesura, flinging energy weapons.

And it was a point in one of the myths that these things were made out of silver, solid, pure silver, so pure that it basically defied pureness. It was beyond 99. Right. And whatever it was that purity of that silver contributed to this particular god being able to do this. So we have this all the way through history, and it is, in fact, even for us, it's a magnifier, which I was going to bring up to Joe.

Have you been wearing your medallion? It's been sitting on my nightstand next to me at night when I sleep. Okay, well, you can't wear it while you're sleeping, but during the day you may want to do it. Dick Algae is getting really fired up over his right. He's expressed that there's been quite a certain increase in clarity of perception and so on.

I'm wearing mine now just because of all of the electromagnetism around here. But I've also noticed that I have had an appreciable uptick in perceptibility or perceptiveness when I've been wearing it for a few days. So you may want to try that with the dreams. I thought it would actually dampen Dick Algaeier's ability down because it's an electromagnetic radiation shield. But apparently what's happening is by shielding out that level of vibration, it allows the others to come through that much better, faster, pure, et cetera.

Right. That's my supposition at the moment in the chat are confused. You were talking about silver, but now I believe you're talking about Shungite. Shungite. I'm talking about Shungite.

I've been doing experiments, and I got these particular Shungite medallions and have sent them to a few of the Woo Woo guys, right. And their protection against electromagnetic radiation. They also aid in dealing with cell phone radiation and stuff. But I was curious to see, because of some stuff I'd read in literature, what the impact would be on ESP kind of stuff. Right.

So, of course Dick Algier and Joe, et cetera. Right. Mailing off to them just to see if there's any significant effect. Now we are finding that it is a significant effect. And of course, Dick doesn't have to be snoozing when he's doing his stuff, so it's not dangerous for him.

I'm worried Joe may strangle himself while he's sleeping. Right. Very good cliffs. Let's go back to this hyper novelty here. So you mentioned here, of course, you live in the future with the Webbot data reports and you're concentrating on that, but for the people who are just catching up to this big wave here.

I remember you did a video with me a year ago where you're talking about how people were going to jump from the Normie timeline into this Woo timeline and they have like an acclimatization period to go through. They're in that now. A lot of those people have joined us, Cliff. So let's try to maybe roadmap here the next couple of months. You've been talking about this amrev two way before it happened.

You were talking about the death of the dollar here and the degradation of the dollar and what that brings in terms of the ability for the government to bribe people to keep these secrets, to keep all these systems together. If you were to paint the pictures here, you talked about silver maybe being freely traded for the first time in September here. You talked about that a couple of months ago. What do you see? And in one of your videos you're talking about this batshit craziness starting perhaps in September here.

So let's bring the dial now a little bit more for the audience members and let's try to see how we can navigate some of the things that you're seeing here as perhaps maybe the temporal markers of importance here for humanity. So we have to understand that we're in a generalized trend of dispersal. Okay? So it's like we're all in one of those little atomizers and we've been blown out and we're floating and we're separating, right? Because we're having dispersal of all different kinds of efforts and stuff at the moment.

This is what's leading to the crumble of the main power structure. Things like censorship, vaccine mandates, all this kind of stuff is going to go away. The big pharma is dying. All of this stuff is dependent on the dollar. The dollar can't exist without the rigid control structure of the Kaliyuga, which we're now out of by 325 years.

Okay? That is important. In some ancient books they talk about having discovered that there's these transition periods within the leaving of one Yuga and the beginning of another. So you notice that all of the stuff about Christianity developed in a particular phase of the last Kali Yuga, the exit phase. That's where some new stuff is allowed to happen because there's some little bit of emanations of galactic center headed your way.

Right? So they performed a math, and basically they said, when you're coming out of the Kali Yuga, what you're going to have to prepare for is 300 years of slogging out of it, dragging all of that crap on you, the baggage of the 2400 years of the incenseate, not really thinking the biggest transportation thing in your life is a mule. Okay. So it takes you a long time to drag your ass out of that mindset. In that 300 years, look what we've accomplished.

Cars, airplanes, yada yada, yada, yada yada. All stuff not in your Kaliyuga, because Kaliyuga is defined by rough wool clothes, no belts, and riding donkeys. Okay? So there's this transition period, and it's based on a quarter. So a quarter of the length of the last Kaliyuga.

So the actual last Kaliyuga was the ascending half of the Yuga. So it was 1200 years. Quarter of that was 300 years. A quarter of that 300 years is the transition period into the new Yuga. That's what we're in now, 25 years into that period of time.

So that transition period provides you with the template, the theme of the Yuga you're in, that's going to be ahead of you, that you're going to be living into. So now we're into 2400 years of a Bronze Age. And in these last 25 years, look at all of the political stuff that's happened, look at all the science stuff that's happened. These are setting certain trend lines for us. Within this 75 year transition period, after the 300 year period of slogging out of the Kaliyuga, in this 75 year period of time, we're going to split the memes into those that are sustainable and those that are dying.

And so you can say now, oh, Big pharma, it won't be here in 50 years. Right? It won't be here. Actually, you can divide this 75 year period of time into three years, into three sections, a 25 year period of time that we've just finished the next 25 years, which is going to throw away all the old stuff we've decided is crap, and then we're going to provide space for the new stuff to come in. All right.

But we won't necessarily be able to see all of the new stuff that's going to arrive in that last 25 year segment, because we have to go through this cleaning out process. Now, here's the thing. The cleaning out process in these old ancient manuals about this shit describe it as having to have a component of active participation of mental discrimination. So this is going to be the time when the awake normies basically have to go to school, and they're going to have to say, yeah, oh yeah, they're going to have to own what has happened to them and discard the parts that they don't want that were put on them, negative, et cetera, et cetera. But it's got to be an active mental participation.

So the challenge of the 25 year period of time that we enter into very soon, and I think it's April 3 for a number of different reasons, but that next 25 year chunk is going to have a challenge of us having to interact with each other without a stable paradigm between our individual minds. So you know what it's like dealing with somebody that was a normie last week and thinks they're red pilled now. Right. As opposed to your friend who watches the moon. So entirely different conversations.

There's a huge chasm there, right. It's going to be a very active period for all of us, right? For sure. Talking about letting go, what was funny is you just mentioned this process of letting go. In kung fu, Bruce Lee had this thing with his father.

It was called Laos time. And every Friday you would review what you learned. You would keep what's good. You would throw out the old that doesn't serve you. And you would put in some new or make room for some new teachings.

Exactly what you're talking about there. I love it. Cliff a big part of what you're just talking about here, this cognitive dissonance that a lot of people are going through, all of this batshit craziness that perhaps is in the works here for September and October. A lot of people on our show, Joe and I are talking about this are having trouble sleeping. Now, you were before the curve.

Again, you're living in the future. A couple years ago, you put this concoction together for the audience members here. It's called Cliffhei's pure sleep. Explain this concoction, why you came up with it. First of all, relating to the cancer.

But why now? Perhaps it's even more pressure than ever before. Cliff okay, so I had had major body wastage from the cancer. I usually ran around 170 pounds and was down to 128 at the day I died. Slightly under that, they threw me back.

I was very resentful. When you're that debilitated and you're in that much pain and dealing with all of this stuff, as well as dealing with the cancer industry, trying to put you back into a state of being in cancer right. So that you need them, because there was a lot of that. I couldn't sleep, so I started looking, being active, I thought, okay, so my mind was shot by the cancer. You lose teeth, you lose calcium in your bones.

It's a terrible way to die. And so rebuilding myself, I decided I would focus on one thing, fix that one thing, and then I could move on to something else. Everything else. I could just hold steady in terms of my life and just concentrate on one thing. And so that one thing I chose.

I figured that, well, the best thing I could do would be to affect my ability to sleep. Then I really started investigating sleep about how important it was for weight management, for rebuilding, because I was 128 pounds, and no matter how much I ate, a lot of it was not sticking with me because of the damage from. The colon, et cetera, et cetera. So I was in a big mess. So the very first thing I did was to come up with the Pure Sleep.

Now, I say first thing, it took me eight months to perfect it, but I started getting benefit maybe three months into the various concoctions, those that did not make me puke in the middle of the night. Okay, I went through a lot of that. Right? And so I went really researched. I tried melatonin, I tried what was out there and couldn't live with any of that and had to come up with my own approach.

And I came up with my own approach that was based around particular elements in things that you find in like nutmeg and spices. But then I started throwing in things like GABA, which is necessary amino acid complex that is used in building muscle, mass regulating how much uptake you have for weight and so on. Growth hormone. Yes. And all of that.

And it's a precursor to the active component part of human growth hormone. So without that precursor, the damaged body I was in could not meet the growth hormone it needed to put the weight back on me. And as you see, that stuff works, right? It does. Okay, everybody in the chat saying, holy shit, Cliff, you look great.

You look ten years younger, actually. Cliff well, I feel it, that's for sure. Okay. Because now that I've accomplished a lot of those goals, I was able to get back now. And with the el ruderai.

Okay? So that was the last thing I was lacking. So you take so many antibiotics and stuff dealing with the infections you get with cancers and stuff, that my gut bacteria was all gone, totally trashed, and I was living in a very terrible state, so I had to repair that. I repaired the gut bacteria, and then I was able to start doing things like having cayenne pepper every morning, first thing with my eggs. Right.

And that makes you nice and lean, and it puts a certain tension in your sinews and it pumps up the rigidity of the other muscles as well as, as I say, regulating weight and these kind of things. So it's all interconnected. One will block the other. And so I've just come out of several different blockage points, and now I should actually be able to start making some. Hmm.

Very good, folks. If you're interested in some pure sleep, you can do so at forward slash shop. And there's a link here to Cliffhei's. Pure sleep on. Pure bulk.

Yeah. One more thing I wanted to say about that is one of the things I had to have in that which pure sleep really gives, that nothing else will, is that when you wake up in the morning, you don't have a hangover from your sleeping aid, and you're all pumped up and you have your body already charged with everything you're going to need to take on that day. So once I had the balance there of the various components, the dragon fruit, et cetera, et cetera, which, as I say, took eight months, then it was, oh, I'm sucking this stuff down forever. Yeah, I love it, guys. Give it a try.

I love minecrafture, and I love the new versions and the small, twisty, smaller containers. Yeah, they make a lot of sense. Here, let me bring that link back down to the live chat for the audience members who are looking for that here. There you go. Shop.

Cliff, in some of your latest posts, you're talking about you've been talking about this for a while here, but you just brought it back and odly enough today, I believe it was. Yes, you were talking about, we're in MREV. Two now, and odly enough. Somebody gifted me this cup. I brought it out today for the first time, and then I saw you posting this just before the show.

I'm like, okay, universe is telling me we got this. So in some of your latest reports, you were looking at September, October, perhaps, fighting in the street. You had it at a couple of levels. Humans fighting migrants, humans fighting their government, government fighting humans, and perhaps all of that fighting ETS as well. How does that all play out for youngest members?

How do we navigate all this? Is this a North American thing? Is this worldwide? What are you seeing? Okay, all right, so UFOs are not restricted to any continent.

They're seen all over the place, right? It is true that there's more UFOs around places with a lot of power plants, especially nuke plants.

Okay, so where do we start on this? The contention levels, the revolution contention levels are a lot of it doing responding to the radiation that's coming out of Galactic Center, even in these small increments that are reaching us now, where one day you just wake up and say, no, I'm not putting up with that shit anymore. Right? I'm tired of that. I'm tired of the fake money, the lying politicians pulling us back, all of this kind of stuff.

So you're just tired of it. All of a sudden, you change because of the intrusion on your antenna of energies that you don't yet perceive because you haven't been trained yet to perceive them, unlike our friend Dick Algae and our nascent Jedi Joe, right? Okay. So those kind of people, they feel, know you're a dense normie. You don't.

But all of a sudden, you start changing, but they won't recognize that they've changed until the universe provides them a certain level of pushback. That's why it's going to be incredibly chaotic for, like, maybe the next two years. And when we get into street fights, it's not necessarily going to be organized in the sense of protesters against police or protesters against counterprotesters, that things will become really a melee, in the sense that you might be down. There for climate crisis and all of a sudden something happens, and now you're going to go fight somebody over the trans issue in the middle of the climate crisis, riot, that sort of thing? That's the level of chaos that I'm expecting intermittently in the United States.

There's going to be a lot of other areas where it'll flare up briefly and then the governments will force to be hugely brutal because they can't tolerate any drain on their resources. Coddling populations that are in upheaval because as I say, they're normie populations. But now their antenna are starting to pick stuff up that they're not perceiving but is yet affecting them.

I don't want to get into too much of the negativity. A lot of people are suggesting on some of our shows that we're creating or manifesting this future of ours where there's all this fighting and we're going to see these crashes and all that, but at the same time, there's a real reality here. And as you've said in many shows before, you can ignore reality if you want, but you can't ignore the consequences of having ignored reality without sounding how do you say that? Too top heavy. What advice would you give to people who are looking at all this, who on one hand are being told by their family, their mainstream news, that everything is normal, keep shopping, keep doing what you're doing.

And the other, no, we're in a war. We're actually at war. We're going to talk about Maui in a SEC. We talked about last time you were on these train derailments in the States and all of this bioweapon here being used against us. What do you say to the people who are looking at those two things and are trying to figure out, what do I do here?

Do I prep? Do I not prep. Did I put my hand back in the sand? How do you deal with all of this stuff? Cliff that's like a personal reaction kind of thing.

Guy you could tell someone, oh no, stand up and get your spine straight and deal with it. But a lot of people have not got the training or the wherewithal to do that mentally, physically. Their diets have been bad, they don't have the emotional support. So I cut people a lot of slack on this kind of thing. They're only capable of what they're capable of.

But what I do do is I tell people, look, this is a situation we're in and you can believe me or not, it's easily understood. The concept I'm putting across, how you apply it to your life, is hugely varied, okay? Whether you accept it or don't doesn't matter. Even if you did accept it, it's hugely varied. But here's the idea.

Universe desires the expression of irreversibility. It desires the expression into reality of you making a choice such that now I can get into why it does. A lot of people don't care or any of that. I'm just making it this is a statement as though it is fact. You can accept it or not.

I have reason to believe that universe does desire this, that the whole construction of all this matter into some great degree is so that we can make decisions, so that we can express what I term as irreversibility, all right? Because universe, in my opinion, wants to know what will happen. Not what could, may or probably will happen, but what will actually manifest. And it's seeking, for its own reasons, to put pressure on all of us now with this mechanism coming from Galactic Center that we will have more opportunities to make more profound and deeply affecting decisions on a daily basis. And that's what I call hyper novelty, okay?

You're presented with so many different options and ways to go and information and so on that it's like blowing your mind in an acid trip, that kind of thing, okay? A lot of people will react to it that way because their minds have been so normalized into normie world. And so they're the ones that I don't really talk to about cryptos and stuff. Right. I get a lot of questions about that, as you might imagine.

And when people do send questions, it's like it's so difficult for me to understand where you are at that I would not know where to begin should we want to start a discussion. So a lot of those that I actually do read, it's like, no, I just can't get into that. Right. We'd have to have five paragraphs of stuff just to determine where your thinking is on this particular question. Right.

Let's get into crypto. Keep going. Sorry. Yeah. But in any event, though, so we're into this period where you're going to have more choices that will be more profoundly affecting to you.

And even not making a choice will affect you because then conditions around you will be changing. So it is so difficult to describe. There is actually a lot of literature in these old books like things that are four and 5000 years old in Sanskrit that do describe these periods. And they're describing them from the downward side because they were in the descending Bronze Age at that period of time and they were having their capabilities peeled away from them in the reversal of a hyper novelty period. They were literally being dumbed down.

And there were some of these writers that were aware that this was taking place. Fascinating illumination to my mind that they were able to perceive that. I share your optimism because when we talk about getting this bug off her back, you've referred to the bug many times in your Et talks. Imagine what we can actually do humans when we're unleashed, when this innovation is unleashed, when we're not pushed down by all this bribery, the fake money, the slavery, the go to work. And it's very exciting.

Peggy from America says in the chat, JC, I believe that you and your try to be spreading peace and love, it's not always pretty. No, you're absolutely right. Cliff, you've said something before. You said, oh, sometimes I use crude words because we're in a crude reality, or words I'm a profane man, well adjusted to my time. Correct.

Joe, let me help you. Or let me unmute you here. I want you to set up what seems to have just happened here with this announcement for the Bitcoin ETF and where that sets the stage. We just saw a big spike up here in Bitcoin. We have these old web updated reports that as of yet are not fulfilled in terms of these 100K parties for bitcoin.

Set that up for the audience and then ask Cliff here where he thinks all of this is going. Are we going to see a drop? Are we going to see a pop? Let's have that conversation for the audience, Joe. Yeah.

So what was it? Grayscale fought this whole thing of them not being allowed to do the ETF and all this crap, and then basically they're coinciding with them. And I think I said BlackRock in my video. Initially. I didn't mean BlackRock, but BlackRock's invested in a bunch of the main bitcoin miners.

So go.

So again, we got an ETF. The court ruled, yeah, they should have been allowed to do it. And of course, everything pops on that news. Not real huge, but 5-8-7 and the whole market goes up at the same time. So I know Cliff had sent us an email, I think, recently, and it was something about September we may get this move, this noticeable move in crypto.

And then maybe by the end of the year, he's thinking that maybe it's this Christmas where his Webbot data was picking up on the I don't know what the hell this is, but it's 100K bitcoin parties. There's people having 100K bitcoin parties. People are celebrating everywhere because bitcoin hit one hundred k. And of course, we've been waiting like, wow, when it's count of Silver, when it's like, I don't know, but it's in the data. Be rest assured it's going to happen because even some of the again, 20, 16, 20, 17, 20, 15 things.

Me and you were talking about this two years ago on YouTube, JC, like, holy shit, we need to get some of these old things because this is incredible, it's happening right now. And then I'd start scanning through the document to go, okay, let me find that section of what we're talking about for the show tonight. And me scanning to find it, I'm reading the rest of it, going, oh shit, I got to add that too. And I got to add that too, because what else is in here? Then it's like, let me go look through the other freaking reports and start talking about that stuff, because it was coming so it was just definitely a few years ago.

But Cliff seems to think this could be the Christmas for that kind of price. I wasn't personally wasn't thinking this could be this Christmas like that soon, but nonetheless, I don't know. Cliff, what do you think? Well, here's the problem with that. It won't be in a time that we would consider to be good.

All right, so this is a pretty bad time, you got to admit, economically. And so you're not going to get 100K bitcoin parties at Christmas if the dollar is doing well and everything's cruising along and inflation is coming down and gas prices are coming down and all of that. We've got fuel prices here that are outrageous. We've got nearly a dollar a gallon in climate tax on our fuel here in Washington State, highest in the nation. I think our infrastructure is crumbling.

Everything is really shit all the way around economically. Government's not investing in forest management. So we're getting into a huge forest fire season because they've sent assholes out to light these fires off, all of this kind of stuff, right? And so I'm feeling more solid with that kind of prediction on the 100K party, because here's the thing about that, and this is the mechanism by which that could happen. Look at what happened today on that little bit of news.

Okay. How much of a pop did it take? Maybe $1,000 overall?

Yeah, about 6% here today. So about 1000, right? Yeah. Okay. And that's on that little bit of news in that little bit brief of period of time, how much did it go up?

Yeah, it was down around 26,000. Okay. 29. Okay. So we popped up quite a bit then.

Okay, so more than 1000.

We would be in a situation where we would have those kind of moves multiple times a day based on the news. So, you guys, I caught some of your stuff while I was making dinner and was listening. And so I'm just listening to all of the political stuff that Joe's talking about and the stuff that he's not really even casting his eye over. So imagine a situation just even a month from now, not even that even 20 days from now, where the stuff we're seeing on bitcoin and or the politics is happening at a rate ten times as packed in our day. So what if there were ten such announcements on bitcoin today, right?

Would that be a $10,000 move today?

If we have the dollar dumping? Like Enthusiast told us, the parity with China is coming, and it's seven to one now. So let's just assume for a second we do get seven to one go to one to one, not because China is going up, but because our dollar is dumping, so everything's going to be repriced. That's kind of like the $600 silver thing. It may not be a real $600, but it's 600 in your US.

Dollars at that time because of all the shit happening around you, is why it's so high. But your freaking cost of everything else is way the hell up, too, because your dollar just puked. So that could look at what you were saying there, Joe. If we're at a seven to one and we were to go to Parity, what would that do to our price relative to bitcoin? Multiply it by a factor of six fold.

Right. So six times 29,000. It's right there. Yeah. Cliff, you were also talking about let me just jump to silver again here because you mentioned September, it could be freely traded.

Were you tracking that also from the geopolitical stuff we were seeing on the radar? Or is there something else also perhaps with supply or more, etc. Okay, there's a couple of moves, very giant moves that have been made in the background with Indian and Chinese industrial supply relative to silver. Okay? You have to understand that what we're facing is this.

There's a US mandated or not US, but World Economic Forum driven focus on climate crisis that has propelled the solar products industry, which is a very heavy user of silver. Okay? So just at the time that we're now coming into, which is going to be the repudiation of the climate crisis, I notice that there's a whole lot of people, firms, companies that are reporting that they're being approached. These are guys in the solar business in India, in Know, Myanmar, all of these kind of places that are reporting being approached by people trying to buy their silver supply on the thinking that their business, the solar business, is going to be reduced and these guys will therefore not need that much silver. But here's the thing, okay?

So this move makes no sense unless you look at it in a slightly different perspective because they're offering these guys current prices for the silver. If they actually thought that the US driven climate crisis thing was going to fade away and we wouldn't push everybody to get into solar panels, they would wait for the whole solar industry to crash and then go in and buy the silver. Right. They're not doing that. They're trying to buy it up as the solar industry is running into production problems on a various different way, various different areas.

They're having problems shipping, they're having problems getting materials, et cetera, et cetera. And there's apparently people out there buying up silver. And so this was very unusual. And these guys are apparently well healed in taking anything and everything that you're prepared to dump. Right.

We're talking some of the mill or manufacturers are reporting being able to offload significant portions of a ton and have payment that day. Wow. Yeah, we're seeing the downdraws at Comex and LBA May in the last two years, but you're bringing it to a whole other level. Let me add this component to it, cliff, also in some of your reports now, dating back five, six months. You were talking about this big derivatives and bond debacle or explosion.

We saw this go down last year and for all sentence and purposes, it seemed to have been papered over. The trading here for evergrande was halted for a number of months. It just resumed and lost almost 87% here in the first day or two. In the Astrology, we're seeing that perhaps this big tsunami actually starts in Asia, then goes to Europe and then goes to North America. There seemed to have been some debate on whether or not this tsunami or these bond crisis would start in Europe or perhaps even in Asia.

In your web audit reports, what do you see now? Is this perhaps that first trigger that sets us up for this batshit crazy September, perhaps September 11 into October? What do you think about this Cliff? I don't think it's the first trigger, but I think it will be Asia. The poor management that our guys have of fiat currency is magnified by the dynamic stresses in interasian politics there.

So you get a lot more cheats in the money system there than even we have. And our money system itself is a cheat. So their bonds are getting to the point where it's quite shaky. Maybe that part of that is the silver thing. There's rumors in some of the Asian Trading forum about a metals backed offering coming out of Asia.

What form and so on, I don't know. These are just the wildest parts of the rumor, but I suspect that what we're going to get into is not a single point of failure, but the bleed from 99,000 cuts, right, that kind of thing, that were coming into a period of time that the ancients described in their reverse. So they went through it in reverse. There were guys that talked about the human mind slowly being reduced in a funnel like fashion in the public over the last thousand years. This was out of a civilization that was in the Harappa Valley in India.

That civilization had no jails. It had no signs of war toys. If you're going to have war, you got to get your kids inculcated. So you're going to have to have war toys. Okay?

They had no signs of armory. They had in the periphery around the farms, they had animal husbandry kind of weapons, right? Some bows for hunting, but that was it. Nothing compared to the population. Some bows.

There was no sign of a jail. There was no sign of any kind of incarceration. They had public signage that we can't understand because we can't interpret it. We have no knowledge of this. They lasted for over 1000 years.

There's no sign that they had any form of species. I came across something that was written about that time, about that time by someone further closer to us where he was referencing someone in that time who had spoken and they were basically saying damn soon we're going to be so stupid, we're going to have to trade species to each other in order to transact.

Wow. Yeah. Fascinating.

Now imagine it on the other side. They were going into the funnel. We're coming out of that dense funnel. So our options are going to increase. Everything's going to be opening up for us and be in a distributed, diverse, dispersive fashion that you'll be able to pursue because these things keep going on into the future, right?

So I'm expecting more ways to pay, more ways to transact, more utility out of Bitcoin. Further, further, further. But things like the dollar hamstrung by official dumb fiat currency designed as a cheat in a period of time when people are much more awake, it's just not going to fly. No. And we're already talking about 40% of global economy here under the bricks.

And that number is growing, as you're saying here. We're moving into this multipolar world of exchange. Speaking of that, Cliff, so we're seeing the battle now that you forecasted two, three years ago, where we would enter this fight between the decentralized crypto and this new advent of CBDC, the government, the old guard, trying to make themselves relevant again. In some of the latest exchange you put out, maybe just last week, you're suggesting that the CBDCs don't fly or that dog don't hunt no more. Explain to the honest members, because there's a lot of fear porn out there saying, no, the CBDCs are coming with the digital passports and all this COVID passports and all this stuff and they're going to enslave the rest of the population.

Now, that's nice, that could be their plan. But there's a reality that needs to back up that plan. And so far that reality is not manifesting. In fact, the detriment to that reality is manifesting as we see some of their test programs go down the shit toilet very quickly. Explain that to the audience members.

What's happening with the CBDCs they introduced? CBDC is a very complex piece of software, right? It's a software system that's designed as a system from the get go that does not evolve. So it's not like a cryptocurrency where you design the currency and then systems evolve around it, making utility out of it. Here you design the whole utility because it's a top down kind of a thing.

So you've got to design it. So it's all crafted. And so they've rolled them out and their design wasn't good. People didn't like them, didn't work. And this is as we get into more and more brighter people, but even so, even with us dense fellows now, it's a consumer economy.

And if you can't get consumer acceptance, your product does not fly. And the tests on the central bank currencies in Africa. Even some of the digital tests I've heard about from people that are actually doing this kind of thing right, that are working with firms in Switzerland, for instance. And they're running simulation tests on CBDC designs where they put them through all of these different rigid, or they put them through code processes to see how they may perform if these softwares actually had to do things. So they would for instance, every time there was a software call to pass something across the network, you'd put a tick in a tally box and you'd tally all these things relative to transaction speeds and so on.

Right. And the central bank digital currencies are woefully inadequate. Bear in mind that their design was intended to replace something like Visa or Mastercard. Okay? Visa and Mastercard arose from Diners Club cards from a closed system association design.

And our current use of these cards has been magnified by, well, the associations existed. So probably pretty close to 100 years of use. And so they're extremely complex. They have all these different node areas. People are happy with them and so on.

But you can't just move that over and replicate it. So the CBDCs are failing at a technical level and they're also failing at the consumer acceptance level. Those areas that they've rolled them out have had, what, a brief I think the longest one has lasted 29 days of the bulk of people still using it at the end of that month. Thereafter it goes right. It reminds me of the new Facebook thing that just came out and disappeared.

When you're selling something that people don't want, you're not going to be in business. Very so CBDCs are probably not long for this world, but that doesn't mean that the people shouldn't educate themselves about decentralized cryptocurrency in the advent here, that we're getting more and more options for humanity. Talk about that, cliff in your web audit reports you had this panic to own moment for cryptos. Where are we? These we're coming very close to that, see.

And so that's another propellant for the $100,000 Christmas parties for Bitcoin, because here's what we're facing. We're coming up to a crisis point. No one can say they'll get a lot of predictions. I would have to do a lot of math just to feel comfortable guessing. But we might be 30 days from it, we might be 90 days from it, we might be maybe 120 days from it, but I doubt we're much beyond that for a lot of different reasons.

Okay? But we're coming up to a moment when we're going to have the first crack appear in the dollar structure and that's going to scare the absolute shit out of Normie land. All right? So imagine a situation. I don't know how it'll manifest.

It'll just be really strange. It could be as strange as credit cards being refused on moss in giant areas of the country because of technical breakdown or because the banks behind them broke down, that kind of thing. It may be that we're going to have it'll be a shocking event and that will propel people to. Suddenly wake up that have been hearing about Bitcoin, they'll have seen a couple of these nice rises on Bitcoin. Bitcoin will be percolating up, drawing the rest of the cryptos with it, so there'll be a little froth in the spew out there about it.

And then all of a sudden, something will happen to the dollar that'll be like a headline grabber. Now it'll be happening in the midst of all of this other chaos. So if you're paying attention to politics, you may not tumble to the dollar thing until someone slaps you upside the head. The next time you try to use your credit card and instead of the $20 showing on the pump, you going in there because your credit card is refused, because it won't process the $200, because he's multiplying whatever is on that pump by 20 or by ten. In order to get the actual amount of value out of it.

We're going to have to do those kind of things. They won't be able to change the price on fuel pumps fast enough to reflect the degradation of the dollar relative to the purchase of that material. It'll be everywhere like that. And so this probably references the seven to one flattening of the dollar. And in that period of time, people are going to freak out.

Yeah, for sure. Joe, talk about this crypto craft course we put together the other day, last year, actually, through all of this, explain to the audience members what they can get if they're new to all of this, what they need to understand and why we put this course together in the way that we did here. Yeah, building a thing with JC, it's like we need to have something that someone who doesn't know anything about crypto can figure out. How do I get in, how do I buy it, where do I buy it, how do I transfer it? If I want to go and actually trade somewhere for other coins and do things like that, how do I do that?

For example, I think we use Mandela as an exchange to show Exodus wallet, coinbase, stuff like that. So, again, if you're already an OG in crypto, that's not for you, but certainly for new people. If you need some handholding, this is kind of the video that really shows you. And if you need more handholding after that, probably have to find somebody to do it because I don't know if I can break it down any more than that.

Or you can join the community here on Joe's Patreon. Of course, there's the Elite package there for you guys as well, if you more handholding. Going back to sorry, the web data reports, there are a couple of people asking for that. Yes, these are the original honorbridge reports that Cliff was kind enough to provide us for the website here. You can download them for free here on the website.

It's beyond Mystic Net forward slash cliffhigh now, you know, those aren't inclusive though, of course. That's right there's. There's all different kinds of reports that were audio and other format that we just were not able to recover. I had my entire office pretty much rated when we moved and vast quantities of stuff was stolen. But this is a good place to start if you're not sure what we're talking about.

We're talking about all these temporal markers. If you want to have a feel to where we are now with what those predictions were at the time, this is where to go. Let me bring that link back down for the live chat here as well. Now Cliff, there's a couple other things here I want to talk about Veritasium too. This prediction that the government would at some point maybe come head in hand to Reggie Middleton here after this big shakeup or after this big breakage, how close are we to that, Cliff?

We just got last year, Reggie getting his patent, but so far Veritasium itself has not moved and we haven't seen anything crash so far. What are your thoughts on that, Cliff? Late spring, next year? Wow. Okay.

Very interesting. Very interesting. You want to leave it at that or do you want to there's no point in going into it. There's so much crud coming.

These are the questions that people were asking me all day. Ask them about your okay, Cliff, I mean, you've been on already an hour. A big thank you to you. Is there anything else you want to share with the audience members before you go? You think that are important?

Again, I can have you on for another 2 hours straight. I have a list of questions here, but I don't want to abuse your time. What do you think is important for people to focus on right now? There's the problem guy. I've been focusing on the moon and the space aliens, but that's two years out for most people, right?

So they're going to need to focus on the immediacy of their lives and that's going to relate to the money, to the degradation of the government, to the reconstruction of the social order, all of these different kinds of things in the immediacy of the moment. I'm old, retired guy, I'm tough as nails. I'm prepared to be just incredibly violent if you come and abuse me. So mostly people leave me alone. And so I'm still thinking two years out.

So it's kind of something to pull back to the moment. There's going to be all kinds of changes though in the Republic around you. Okay, so I've lived as a military brat all my life and so military activity I pay attention to, but it does not freak me out. Okay. This is something that most American citizens will have not been exposed to.

Will be soldiers on the streets. It will be overhead patrols by actively armed helicopters, drones, air force and Navy jets. There will be ships off of all of our ports, all different kinds of in your face open military activity in the United States. Now, you got to understand that they'll put the best people out there that they possibly can have, and they'll have some really tough sons of bitches in charge of them to keep everything as tightly controlled as possible. But these guys at some point will have to rely on non battle tested soldiers who will be put into situations where they will have to make decisions based on guidelines.

But those guidelines don't really describe the fellow rushing at you with a machete or a brick and your particular circumstances at that moment, right? So we are going to get overreactions, and you can contribute to that as the public in overreacting against this sort of thing. But this is going to be very unwise. So if you see your buddy, who is both a climate activist and a masked antifa assailant, suddenly that as well. Who knows?

Suddenly getting swooped up off the street by obviously military people that have blank areas for their emblems and themselves are wearing face coverings, you should keep the hell back. Because it is an act of officialdom. You will endanger yourself and maybe the fellow you're trying to help by getting involved. We're coming into a very weird time here.

I saw this in Germany because my dad was in the occupation forces after the war. I've seen these kind of activities in places. I was in Algeria during the Algerian uprising. Happenstance, okay? So you see these kind of things happen.

And just as a kid keeping because I was a military Brad, I knew to keep my mouth shut and stay back in the corner and watch around, right? And so I saw a lot, and I'm expecting a great deal initially, I'm expecting it to happen in three waves, okay? A sort of a minor wave and then a big blow up wave and then a trail off wave. And this will be three waves of bad interactions between people in the United States, citizens and non citizens, with the military of the United States and these bad interactions, the middle wave will be driven by the communists, okay? It will be deliberate.

And so that's the one to watch out for. They'll do it when they're desperate. Because in my way of thinking, there's going to be a quiet sort of what do they call that, a Pacification operation, old language from Vietnam. And what will happen is that mostly at night or very early in the morning, certain people will just be picked up off the street. They'll be pulled out of their houses.

Some will be taken at work, okay? Because it will be decided that that's the best way to get them early in the morning before the rest of the crew's in, that kind of thing. And these people will have various reasons for being picked up, mostly because they are revolutionaries and are performing illegal acts against the United States government and against the population of the United States. And these acts can be proven and the people can be identified, and so these people will be picked up. This is going to cause a lot of chaos, as may be expected, when this happens, there will be this wave of it.

A certain amount of the total people that they want to get, they'll grab. Maybe they'll get 20% in that first wave. The masterminds behind the whole mass will see what's going on. They'll get wind of it via rumors and shit, right? And they'll suddenly, oh, my god, my troops are being snatched up.

They'll call them bag and tag, right? They're being bagged and tagged. And so what they will do is they'll panic, and so they'll call out the rest of their people to be violent and think to have a counterrevolution to take back from the revolutionaries, the military that's supporting the revolutionaries, right? So this will all be done by official them by the military. During that period of time, it will be most dangerous for you to interact in any way with either side, and it's just going to be chaotic as hell, but it should be relatively brief.

Could you use the board and plot those three waves in time behind you for the audience members who are more okay, say that we were looking at, and this will be coinciding with all of the other chaos, including the dollar death and stuff, right? And I actually expect that the first wave of the violent stuff here will have some level of dollar degradation that prompts this initial rise, all right? People will be getting a little sketchy. There's all different kinds of stuff going on. They can't buy stuff, all different sorts of weird shit happening that raise your general anxiety level, and they'll react in a violent way, right?

And that will prompt the military to come on in and grab this first group. And then the Kazarian mafia will freak out. That's George soros Bill Gates at all? They'll freak out, and they will deliberately plot something like that to where they come back into control, only it won't go that way. They'll try and initiate this, and it'll go up a certain way, and then it'll end up going like that, and it'll be a bigger snatch and grab, much more violent, much more public, and much more exposed relative to the fact that it's happening and the large number of people being snatched up.

At this point, I expect reverse immigration to occur in a visible way to the point where people are actually trying to break through the wall to get the hell out of the United States. Then the third wave is down here like that. And this will be desperation, violence initiated by the people in that last gasp because they know that they've been targeted, they've been ID, they'll have been hiding this kind of thing. Right. The caged animal approach.

And what do you say is the total length of time? And where does this start in your mind? You tell me. When the dollar does the second notch out of those one to seven difference with the Chinese, when it drops two notches there, this will tick off. Okay.

Then that will continue to degrade as we get into this. But their degrading will not be the prompt for this.

This will be the paranoia level of the Kazarian Mafia. So if some of these bastards get snatched in a public way or get offed or something like that and their paranoia ratchets up, then that can move this closer to this event. Gotcha. Wow. Somebody just asked angry Ferret, what about Canada and all this?

You had something in there that perhaps we would go back into the boot and then we would be saved maybe by the USA. If you look at the old reports, it basically described a period of time where patriots and citizens of the United States were fighting for their lives against the evil Kazarian Mafia. And we're going to fight for our lives, and we're going to win, we're going to prevail. And when we're done there, the effort now that the Khazarian Mafia had been exposed at a global level does not cease. Okay?

So in my way of thinking, in my way of describing it, amrev two, in which we complete the job, morphs into global rev one, and thereafter, okay? So after we go through this period of time, if a bunch of people in the newly liberated state of California decide that they're going to form a venture to go and liberate Canada, you think Trump's going to stop them? Because under those circumstances, our government's going to be radically changed. It's not going to interfere with the citizens and their will to do as they will. Right.

So we got to go back to that old Revolutionary War period kind of thinking. And so I think that there's going to be liberation parties, right? Active efforts to subvert the Khazarian Mafia in their dominion over all of these various other quasi national states australia, New Zealand, you know, all the way back to China. Ultimately, it always goes back to China. I think we get to the moon problem.

Before we get into the Chinese issue, though. Let me talk about that for a second. What exactly is the moon problem? Okay, so our moon is inhabited, as your buddy knows. Right.

Bruce sees all he knows. They're up there doing shit. These bastards up there are hugely active. They are doing things that a paranoid might suspect, means that they're going to do something big. Okay?

So imagine this concept that the moon is like that Death Star in the Star Wars. It's a craft. It was built. It's here because it was damaged. One of its layers of protection is all this material on the outside of it.

If you're going to build a moon, you want to put every kind of weird stuff you're going to need in the future and just dump it on the outside. Nothing's going to happen to it. When you need it, you just go out in a truck and pick up the stuff to make your cement or whatever. Right? Okay.

So the moon is a sphere covered by a thick layer of raw material for the use of its inhabitants. There's activity that seems to suggest that something very large is going on in the moon. All right, so let me describe this. If you keep the picture of the moon up there, we've got this situation anyway. So the situation is that there appears to have been a fire up, a test firing of something.

Okay. I think it's a test firing of a major reactor that powers that thing through physical space. If we were to look, we can't really see it, but the area on the picture of the moon you've got here, if you were to look in the southern left quadrant over there in that quarter, that whole quarter of the moon. So we've got the moon like this in your picture. There you go.

Okay, so this whole area of the moon over here, it wasn't like exactly a quadrant, but a giant area in there heated up. It heated up in a specific way that indicates, in my way of thinking, a reactor, not an engine. Okay? And so imagine a situation where your moon is powered and your central heating system, so to speak, breaks down, and it breaks down in such a way it takes you a few thousand years to repair it. That's where we're at now.

There's activity on the moon like you wouldn't believe. They're taking down bridges, they're putting up bridges. They're moving vast quantities of the material itself. We're seeing areas of the moon actually get taken away around our vision. So areas on the moon, you can see that there's mining going on here, and whatever they're taken out there is going around where we can't see it.

This level of activity has increased in direct proportion with the reports of it, in direct proportion with the increase in UFO sightings that are occurring down here. So now maybe they're not going to move the moon, which would be catastrophic for us. I would die if they were to do that because of the sloshing of the ocean. Right. The ocean would slosh up 155ft here and drown me.

Imagine what that would do to the people who are already crazy on full moons also. Yeah. Why all of a sudden are we india is going to the moon and Russia is going to the moon and Russia looks like garbage to me. Of course. Yeah.

And what are they attempting to gain in terms of knowledge and stuff? It's not mining expeditions or any of that kind of shit. Right. We were told not to go back when we had our moon landings.

It's kind of like I think of it this way. There's a big park over here, and there's two big Grizzlies that live in that park. And we've had a confrontation with the Grizzly and we backed off and ran out. But mostly, even if the Grizzly is sort of aware of us, if we're just doing stuff in the periphery, that big Grizzly is not motivated to haul his ass over to chase us. Right?

So if India goes to the South Pole, the aliens up there not busy there. They don't care about it at the moment. So it's not worth it. Right? It's an energy calculation.

Is it worth it for us to go in and initiate this openly antagonistic relationship with the people on that planet over there just because these guys are messing about in our pile? Uh, titanium. Is it possible, Cliff, that Russia going to the moon? Soon after, NATO suggested that Ukraine wasn't tall enough to fit into NATO, and then the Pentagon announced that they were pausing this counteroffensive. Are they following people back to the Moon?

And some of this hunting down of these assets, do you think that's part of it too, for? No, I don't think anything like there's no Earth human bases on the Moon, okay? I'm not saying there aren't humans up there because for all I know, there may be humans, right? But those humans are not part of our social order that are out there hiding on the Moon from us. What we're dealing with out there, I think, in my opinion, have the highest level of probability of being the remnant of the l.

Okay? So imagine their situation. So the L are predatory species. We call them the L, the Theoi, the Divas, the gods of the Aztec. All of these guys are a predatory species.

They live off of adrenochrome, which is the output of the oxidized output of adrenaline, which is caused by vagus nervous stimulation. Now, here's the thing. Vagus nerve does not connect to the adrenal gland complex, but the vagus nervous system connects to all the other organs, which in turn those connect into the adrenal gland cortex, right? And so the adrenal glands are affected in a very powerful way by what you do to the vagus nervous system. And so that's actually how you produce adrenochrome in quantity, is you provide fright, which activates the pineal gland to nerve number ten, and it triggers this half nerve, this number eleven, this quasi number eleven as well.

And that produces the flood of activity down through your spinal column that affects all of your other organs in what we call the fight or flight syndrome, which produces the adrenaline pump, which produces the oxygenation of it through your breathing, which produces the adrenochrome, which gets them incredibly high. And these guys are addicts. They're not very, you know I'm sorry, guys. Yahweh. All of these kind of people.

That species is not very intelligent. It's driven by baser instincts. It's driven by addiction, serious levels of addiction. And they don't aspire to greatness, nor do they aspire to elevate humans. This is the same with the gods of the Aztecs that had the Aztecs at one time kill 45,000 people in a single day to get the adrenal glands out to burn for the offering.

So they're not good people. I think they've taken refuge in the Moon. I think they did that because they could no longer sustain the gones down here on Earth. And these guys frequency from the central sun, you mean? Right.

These guys down here, the l, the theo il of these god beings are incredibly sensitive to the central galaxy Emanations and probably arose somewhere further closer to it such that they need more of it. Right. And they come out here because we're easy prey. Okay? So all these minor spiral arms are a bunch of dense fuckers like us that barely get any of this stuff except a couple of times in our long sweeps.

And so these guys came here, they abused us. At some point they could no longer sustain the level of radiation they needed to feel comfortable. So their society collapsed until only the El were living in an area near Judea and then finally they collapsed. That and I think they went to the Moon. I think the rest of the people in India, in Japan even, and all throughout Russia and China and Greece and so on, I think all of those other people that are also sort of L, whatever we want to call them, I think they took off en masse long before the l from Judea took off.

I think that for whatever reason there was a squabble between the two groups and a remnant group here, the l of the l of the Bible. They took off last with a separation of probably 500, 600 years from the other group. And I think these guys went to the Moon where it would be easier to sustain the electromagnetic bubbles that you need to pump up that galactic center Emanation. Because I think what happens is that they have a frequency generator and or the bubbles that they create somehow capture it in a one way kind of a filter approach. Right, like a greenhouse effect of exactly.

Precisely. Yeah.

I've seen the minds of the people just blow up. I'm sorry for that, guys. If you're new to all of this, it's your fault, dude. You sent me that email. You said there's a bunch of normies out here.

We're going to fry some synapse.

Thank you, Cliff. I appreciate that. Guys. Yes. Please stay tuned to the next bruce Sees all this.

An older poster here, but I'll have Bruce come back up. The last time he was on, he was showing all of these megastructures on the Moon. It's very clear to see, even with personal telescopes. That's how huge they absolutely are. And of course, all the activity flying in and around the moon and also the sun.

So we'll have Booth on very soon, guys, if you're interested in more of this crazy wacky woo shit, of course you can find Cliff on his substac here. A lot there, of course, to digest. You can find him also on a daily basis here on his Twitter. You were just off and now you're on again. What just happened here on Twitter?

I don't know what that was. I couldn't post for a long time. I could post it and then Twitter would tell me, nope, we've got a know that little thing that says, oh, there's an error reload, maybe that'll fix it. And it didn't do period, for whatever reason, for a period of time, like maybe four or 5 hours, I was on somebody's shit list and then they unlisted me and I was able to go back again. So I don't know what it was.

A couple of the doctors that were very outspoken on the COVID and a couple of the guys that I know that are very outspoken on the Maui Fires have had that effect already on them. The guy on the Maui Fires that I've been corresponding with who lives there, he was not burnt out, but he was able to see it from where he lives. Apparently he's up on a higher elevation.

He's like seriously shut down. So for whatever reason, they've got his IP tagged and he's just not able to get stuff posted. And he did a little video for me, which I'm not at liberty to share, where he ran into exactly the same thing I did. He got his screen going there and tried to post it and then it wouldn't. Now this here, right here is why the heck are they painting all of their properties the same weird shade of blue?

And you've got people that will go out on the internet and say, well look, I found her property that's not there, right? I can't see that shade of blue. And here's the thing, guys. The painting was all done in literally these last couple of years. And so a lot of the pictures you're seeing online don't reflect that because they're three and four years old.

But there's another issue of this too. If you look at the I don't know if it's on the video with the laser, but you can take your house. My house is coincidentally close to that in the shade of blue because my wife chose that five years back. But you can take blue or your chosen shade that the laser is going to reflect and you can paint over it. So you could put your house blue and then you could go back to painting it at regular colors, okay?

You can put all of those regular colors over it. If a laser hits that house, it's not going to burn the house. It's going to burn through that top layer of paint, hit the blue, and then it's done. So it's going to leave little scars. Right?

I did a video the other day about somebody showing these lasers and how they were burning all these different color rags, but not the blue one. This, of course, is some more footage coming out here of these cars melting. Okay, let's talk about that for a second. Okay? I gave some guys some shit online for saying that there was Maui forest fires, because this is not forest fire, it's a grassland fire, okay?

There's no forest involved. There were very few trees that were involved in the fire at all. Most of the trees I saw that in any way were scorched or burned, were standing singly, not in any clumps or anything. Right. But here's the thing.

There's something you need to know about this, okay? So my knowledge comes from the fact that I work for Department of Natural Resources up here in Washington State. We got a shitload of trees. And I worked on the It department stuff, but I was also out in the field, so I did all the statistics on forest fires and stuff, wrote all kinds of software that analyzed that and sort of things. But I've also been out in the field after forest fires.

When I was a kid, I worked cleanup crews and stuff, right? And I've been in a grass fire. Grass fires can burn up to 900 degrees Fahrenheit for the period of time that the grass lasts, which is not hours, it's minutes, okay? Sometimes seconds at that temperature. And if it's wind driven, it will march yards per minute.

Okay? So it moves, leaving behind it char. So there's no way a grassland fire is going to melt a car like that. It doesn't get hot enough to burn through aluminum oxide. Aluminum oxide forms on any piece of aluminum that is just left uncoated.

Aluminum oxide will take at least 3300 degrees to melt through with a tig welder in order to melt the aluminum underneath, which is only 1200 degrees. So if you're aluminum welder, you got to have a fine touch. You got to burn through the aluminum oxide, but not keep that temperature so hot that you vaporize the underlying metal. So an aluminum welder, in my opinion, is the state of the art. Right?

These are guys that have got the most delicate touch in the world. I'm barely adequate at it, and I spent a lot of time doing it. So that's why you don't paint aluminum. There's no point. Aluminum oxide protects it far better than any paint you could apply to it.

So all of those melted cars, it had to have been at least 3300 degrees. You do not get that from the kind of grass fires that you've got there. I was in a grass fire in Washington State in an exceptionally dry summer. When I was a kid in the we had a grass fire, wind blown, come up a hill, which is the way they usually travel and go right underneath a fire engine. And the fire engine had smoke damage.

That was it. Okay? It was under that fire engine for about 30 seconds. Maybe because of the force of the wind driving it and the fact that the fuel is consumed so fast. So now, here's the thing.

In order to get through the aluminum oxide on those engine casings, on the housings, on the manifolds, on the transmission housings and all of that. Where you're talking a serious amount of aluminum that has to get 3300 degrees and sustain it over the entire mass in order to then melt the aluminum underneath, which would indeed run like water. Right. Just as we see how it comes on out. You do not get that it is impossible to get that out of a grass fire.

I've been in fires and cleaned up after them. Where? Washington state. We have serious fires, okay? Forest fires do not burn at 3000 degrees.

You can get a 9000 degree forest fire going, no problem. Especially in our forest in a dry year. Because what happens is the phenolic resins in the SAPS will boil in the tree and vaporize. I've seen cedar trees explode from a fire 50 and 60 yards down the hill that has got the onrush of heat from the winds blowing that heat up past the cedar tree. Instantly, all the green needles go and then the tree just sort of quivers and then it explodes as all the SAP boils inside it.

And when it explodes, it explodes in a giant ball of flame as all this phenolic resin blows up. Right. And that is a 9000 degree forest fire. That can happen. You cannot get those conditions on Maui.

Not in the grass. No. Yeah. Not even in their forest because of the type of trees and the amount of moisture they resin. In the cadet courses, we would take that to create these little torches at night to have, like, little candles in your camp, like right, exactly.

Yeah. Wow. Fascinating. Cliff, while you're on that too, you're on a roll here too. We're on rumble.

You asked a few people the other day, what about tunnels in Maui? You just reported this one also here too. What's the connection with all of this, if any? Can we speak about that now? Clearly, there's obfuscation.

There's a media blackout. There are reports now maybe that there's 2000 children missing. We don't even know yet. And this happened on August eigth. Our drones are being shot down.

People are putting up fences further and further away so that people can investigate what the hell is going on. What's up with the tunnels? What's up with anything else here? Cliff, from the aspect of the tunnels that they've shown those were existent from way in the past. Right.

And may have fallen into disuse and disrepair. My concern though was I don't really want to get into any kind of detail and stuff, but discussions about the idea that there may have been an active reason on the part of an enemy to have those fires in those positions on those islands for things that are underneath the area right. That are not these kind of abandoned tunnels. Okay, so maybe it's Space Force, maybe it's Navy. That's all speculation and that's fine.

It should just end there. There is, in my opinion, sufficient evidence that people are taking advantage of it in a land grab that I'm certain a good portion of the activity was focused that way. Right. Is there a higher purpose on the other side of it, in other words, is some Fu Manchu Chinese mastermind getting a bunch of people whipped up on a land grab in order to get certain things to occur on an island where he wants to disrupt US navy activities. That kind of a deal.

Who knows? Right, right. Well, that's the kind of happening, as they say, never let a good crisis go to waste. There's always all of these levels. But you also posted, and I did another video last week about a lot of UFO sightings as this was occurring also.

So there's the Et component again. Those damn ETS. I'm going to create a new franchise show here on Rumble. We're going to call it those damn ETS. There's so much coming out.

But what did you analyze of some of those UFO crafts? Do you think there's something to it there or is that perhaps more? Okay, so the analysis that I've done in the last few days relative to what was going on Maui back when, would seem to suggest that it was drones, that what was being reported as UFOs was a disguise for the drone activity. Okay. Which makes a lot more sense.

It was not satellites. You're not shooting down lasers or microwaves from satellites to do this. Directed energy weapons have one quarter of the distance reduction factor in their effectiveness. So they can't be more than 600, 700ft away from their target. Even the lasers can maybe go 3000 yards.

Right. But after that they have virtually no power. So whatever it is has got to be reasonably close. And that's all really strange right now, the thing of it is that see right there? So if you had one of those yellow pieces of cloth over that blue piece of cloth, the yellow is going to take the hit, but the blue is going to be unscathed.

Right. And all you got to do is burn off that little bit of yellow there. You're suggesting what's happening? These houses weren't blue. They had a blue undercoat and the top coat blew off here with the laser.

Top coat would just have a scar. Bear in mind this. Okay? All right. So prior to this happening, the islands were mapped by grids of green laser lights from above.

The government here says, oh, maybe it was a Chinese balloon. There's all these weird ass suggestions as to what it caused it, right? But nonetheless, the government knew about it, and so they're trying to blow it off in their control, the information kind of thinking from the Kaliyuga. So we know that it was mapped, so the destruction was chosen. So those sites that were destroyed were specifically chosen.

Now, a few of them, obviously, were badly chosen, where you just got a car in the middle of a field, and whatever the energy weapon was melted the guts out of it. They don't really want to do that. Maybe whoever made the choice wasn't really thinking, or maybe it was an error in execution. From a military viewpoint, you have an error in your thinking or an error in your execution, and you need to be able to determine where the error lies in order to correct it. And so I'm sure someone is doing that level of analysis right now, but we can do that level of analysis as well, because if you go and look at where all of the other hard, heavy heat strikes were, it was designed to cause grass fires, to cause confusion, smoke, destruction, all right?

But it was in a very tightly mapped area, and it's like, okay, yeah, downtown burns, because downtown can burn. But a generalized grass fire erupting in a downtown area that does not spread out into rural grasslands is unusual, to say the least, right? And then you see the laser beam strikes. There's a video out there. I don't know if it's still available.

And it was taken during the time it was happening. I don't know how it was uploaded. I saw it. I should have saved it at the time. It didn't dawn on me what I was looking at it's maybe 25 seconds or so.

And it was from this guy who was talking into his cell phone, and he was taking pictures, but the video was taken by his friend, who was standing back away taking a picture of him. So this kid, maybe he was in his early 20s. He's walking was it that one? No, I didn't see that. I've seen that, but no, this one was even stranger.

Okay? He's walking by an old, disused, like, a gas station, the top part of a gas station where the cars had come into the pumps. But there were no pumps there anymore. It had been converted to something else. But he's walking underneath this big awning thing that the cars would come under to put gas in and then drive out the little building for the gas station back there.

Maybe it was a diner or something. You don't get to see that. He's walking around the edge of it, and he's shouting into his phone as he's taking pictures, saying, look at that, look at that. And he's following Zaps coming down from space that are hitting the asphalt, that are hitting the grass, that are hitting and igniting pieces of paper that are instantly melting aluminum cans, like it just went just almost instantly melted aluminum can. That's when his friend shouts to him from the sidelines, something his name it was indistinct.

I couldn't hear it. Then I did hear him say, Get your ass back here. And that kid then looks around him and sees all of the destruction around him. Smoke starting to erupt from all of these fires and sees these things zapping down around him, which he's still exclaiming about, and he's shouting, Is this from a UFO? Is this from a UFO running his ass back to his other friend, and then the video ends.

These guys may have died in that fire. I have no way of knowing. His friend was trying to get him. At the very last in that video, you hear his friend or somebody saying, let's run down to the water. Yeah.

And that could explain this is not the video we're talking about. It's similar here. I did see the video you're talking about. Now I know which one you're talking about. That could explain also the reports of what we're seeing now where dogs just burnt into place, all families being burnt into place in okay.

They're not burned. Okay? Let's be clear about that. What's the word? Okay.

The dog carcass there was not incinerated. So when I worked in the forest business at DNR and Fisheries, I saw a lot of wildlife that was burned from forest fires. They always have a commonality to them. The commonality is that just like with the cedar trees, the fats escape the body. The fats will boil out of the body and ooze out onto the surrounding area and ignite themselves and burn off and leave this sticky mass so the body becomes desiccated.

These bodies were not that way. They were bloated. They were energized, and everything in them expanded and carbonized, as though it was like cement setting up with that expansion of some level. So the bodies I've seen, the hair is gone on the dogs, but the limbs on them are distorted in the places between the bony joints. So where there's mass in there where you have muscle and stuff, it like, swell up and just got rigid.

So that kind of stuff does not happen when animals burn in a fire. Grass fire with those pyroclastic blasts. Exactly right. Wow. Not a forest fire.

There's so many of it. No. So these animals that were killed probably were not hit by killed by heat, per se. Maybe they were running along. They got a big heat blast.

It fried the cilia in their lungs. As you inhale it, that kills you. That's what kills you in a fire. Okay, so death is quick. You don't actually burn to death.

You inhale a lot of heat. It destroys the little hairs in your lungs and incinerates your lungs, and within like 1020 seconds, you're dead. Takes you longer to leave the body, but you do not suffer in that regard. But then the fats melt out of the body. The body withers down and shrinks down around the bones.

This is a commonality in fire victims. They do not swell up. And yet all of these victims I've seen are not in any way subjected to, like, incinerator temperatures, but they may have been subjected to incinerator energies in Pearl Harbor. They use these torpedoes to bring down these boats in the harbor. And people right now, they're not recognizing that this is, of course, as an act of war.

And I had the conversation at dinner the other day, I'm like, do you think they're going to use 70 year old technology? This is an obfuscated war. We're not supposed to know we're at war. They're going to use these exotic weapons. Do you think we're going to recognize that very soon that this was another pillar?

Okay, so that's what I'm thinking. April 3, next year, I think that we crashed through a hyper novelty barrier, and that would be one of the things that would come on out. I can see the building consensus now that this was an attack, and now people are fumbling around with who attacked us, why, and so on and so forth. Right? Because there's no one standing up.

It's no one obvious, et cetera. It'll take us a while for the mass of the population to cross that line, but the evidence is going to mount. It's going to keep mounting. This will cause a lot of the panic in the Kazarian mafia that will cause them to make stupid decisions such as trying to unleash antifa and all of this kind of stuff to preserve their power. Crazy times.

This is the other video you were talking about, the hotspots cliff, if you guys want to go check that out. Cliff, I'll come back to you last year. Joe, anything you want to share with the audience members before we go? Any new interviews, new concepts coming up here on Realist News and also on Justin for Two, your new YouTube channel here Joe. I'll mention that I've passed by two, the fires were already out, but one was a truck, one was a car, both fires side of the road, and it will melt the asphalt when that happens, because that's typical.

And I saw it. But none of these car fires, which the cars, they were smoked, they were gone. None of them had this liquid aluminum shit going on. And I've seen a lot of car fires in my time. Anyways, never seen this liquid aluminum stuff.

So this is, again, very strange. The other thing I wanted to mention about this is wait, earlier we were talking about silver and solar panel use and all this stuff, and the higher the people's electric bills start going. People are going to start saying, you know what, f this. I need to get solar panels and start back feeding the grid. I can't take it anymore.

This bill is way too high. So then they go out and either refi or whatever they do because a lot of times they've got a nice payment plan for you where they're like, we'll bring your electric bill payment down to here and then it's financed. You just pay us the monthly fee now instead of paying your electric bill. And all of a sudden you're back feeding the grid and you're not really using any power from the grid, so to speak. But again, that requires people going and getting these solar panels installed.

So you could take the dollar with the whole seven to one thing and take it down to one, everything's expensive and your electric bill, everything's just going crazy. You're probably going to have a massive amount of people jumping on the whole solar give me solar panels as fast as possible bandwagon, which is going to cause again or silver to be needed to build those things and all that. So I was just thinking about okay, but I got to dispute that for one reason though, Joe. We're in a labor crisis right now. There won't be any fast installs.

There won't be any way to finance new crews. I've been waiting months to get crews up here to build me a garage. Labor is especially skilled labor is six months to a year out. You got to pretty much schedule that it's going to get worse. And a lot of people don't want to work because there's no point to it the way the things are going.

So I'd have to dispute that. I would say that you would be correct in that except for the labor and then the financiers for these companies are going broke like mad. Okay. So we've seen a lot of that out here where people were trying to sell Tesla power walls, the big banks of batteries, and the companies here in the state that were doing that are now all bankrupt. And so there's jobs hanging and I don't know if they couldn't get crews to install them.

I don't know what the details are. I was never interested in one. I just happen to have peripheral knowledge. So I think maybe that might intrude on this. This may get you your crash, though.

Okay. So there may be just before we get into this giant uptick in certain cryptos, there may be a very large downturn in all of this that is reflected in the numeracy of the material, the way that you had seen way back when. Right. So you may actually have people that are saying $8 silver when you've actually got to pony up $600 to get it in your hand because of the wonkiness of our financial system at that time as it dies. Wow.

It's going to be crazy times, man. I'm trying to navigate all this for the audience members. And sometimes I have to admit, I have trouble putting my head around all of this stuff too. There's so much to swallow in so little time. And my heart goes out to the people who are just waking up now.

That big red peel, they have to swallow that shit in a really short period of time compared to the people on the screen here and some of you watching the show who've been awake for so long. Let's not forget about Don Jr's. Trump Jr's. Post. You better grab yourself a conspiracy theorist friend because you need one soon to explain about what's about to happen.

He posted that shit. Yeah, well, Cliff, why don't we end on that? You posted something maybe six months ago on your BitChute. Exactly. About that how all of these old structures are going to fall and then new communities are going to be built around those conspiracy theorists and those people who were holding the line all of this time.

Explain that that is a pocket of not a pocket, but a toehold to grab onto here into this wishy washy woo we're finding ourselves in. How is that going to it's going to be really bad for everybody because we're going to have to dispute things like science going back 300 years because it's been polluted by economic interests and some papers published, others not this kind of things, people advanced in science and so on. So you won't be able to trust anything for a long, long, long time. And so as a result of that, people will naturally gravitate around us, guys that are just standing up saying the same damn thing over and over and over again, right? And we know what we're doing, and we seem reasonably solid with what's happening because we've been cut out of social order, because we were the conspiracy theorists, right?

Because we saw what others refused to see. They could see it. They just didn't want to acknowledge it. Their minds would not accept that. Now, universe, as I was saying earlier, as an aspect of hyper novelty, wants them to make that irreversible decision.

It wants them to acknowledge that they're seeing the things that we've all seen. Right? And then once they do that, though, what happens? We know because we've all seen it. You have to change once you admit to yourself, I saw that it's real.

And so well, I saw that it's real. It's here know? You better go talk to Joe and JC about it because they saw that shit too, right? Exactly. Thank you so much, guys.

Again, if you want more of this amazing wisdom from Cliff Ha, you can find him on his BitChute here on his Twitter. I'll put the links down in the description box below and of course, also on his substac. And you can find the lovely Joe here on his YouTube channel. Please do go and subscribe there. He's rebuilding after having been deleted there at the same time as me last time.

And you can find him also here on Patreon.com Jsnip. Four guys, thank you so much to that picture of me on my thing. The next one. Next one. The YouTube one.

That one. Look at Cliffhy's Face. That was edited in by my friend Steven. But that's his face. Look at him now.

That's the effect of cancer. That's the effect of vegetarianism. I couldn't eat meat all those years. The tumor rejected it, and so I've rebuilt. A lot of people are saying, yeah, you're looking a lot younger.

We're so happy you're still here, Cliff. Fighting the good fight. Now, I'm okay with it, right? Because I can really punch. I mean, I'm damaged and so on, but I can get in a few punches.

But back then when I died, you would not believe the fight I put up trying to die in the hospital those next four days. I would not have to do this because I was 128 pounds and just breathing was an act of will. Wow. Universe wanted you to stay here for yeah, I was pissed at it, too.

I wanted my retirement on the beach. Guys, come back to this shit. Yeah. Well, thank you for being here, Cliff. We absolutely love you guys in the chat.

Now, if you love Cliff, give him some love in the chat. Give us a comment. Let us know how you like the show here tonight. Reading all of your comments. There's 8600, almost 7000.

Almost 9000. Watching now. Please hit the like button if you like this. Please also subscribe if you want to see more of this content and share this information with your friends here as they are trying to wake up and navigate all of this Wacky Woo, we find ourselves in thanks for noticing, Joe. What's that?

Tell Joe. Thanks for noticing. I never would have spotted, like, that's the same stupid thing I have for a million years now. It's not. It just he put it up and I was just like it just called me like, oh, my God, look at him.

And look at him now. There you go. Oh, my God. Amazing. But yeah, it's incredible.

It is amazing. Yeah. Well, I always knew how to do it right, but with the cancer that they couldn't find, I couldn't do it. But like I say, I'm taking a full teaspoon of 80,000 units or hotter cayenne pepper in my two eggs in the morning. So if that doesn't kill me in the morning, well, damn near anything won't.

Fuck me, Cliff. That's a lot of cayenne. I'm trying to work myself up to that, but I'm not. You are tougher than me, sir. Guys, one last time, if you're looking for these web data reports beyond Mystic Netcliffe.

And of course, this was the Wacky Woo edition. Where did it go? For today, September 5 2023. I love you guys. Please remember to, like, share and subscribe and we'll see you soon.

Odobal. See you. Bye.

Episode Summary:

The text discusses the novelty theory and the work of Russian scientist Kozyrev, who focused on the nature of time. After spending ten years in a Siberian gulag, he developed experiments in the 60s that led to the observation that time exhibits aspects of pressure. This pressure builds up to a threshold before manifesting a result, a pattern that repeats in various aspects of reality, such as the stock market, heartbeat, and chemical reactions. The text emphasizes that this understanding of time's pressure-like behavior can be applied to various fields, including linguistics, and is a fundamental aspect of our reality.

The text explores the concept of building tension and release in various contexts, including chemical reactions, language, human interactions, and societal dynamics. It emphasizes how this pattern can be observed in individual behaviors, such as a fight between two people, or on a larger scale, like potential civil unrest. The author also connects this idea to novelty theory and the Yuga cycles, suggesting that humanity is entering a new age where increased energy from the Galactic Center will lead to an "up-leveling" of human consciousness and technology. The text concludes with a hopeful outlook on humanity's potential growth and evolution.

The text discusses the transition from the Kali Yuga (Iron Age) to the Bronze Age, emphasizing an up-leveling of complexity and novelty production. It contrasts the simplicity of life 500 years ago with today's interconnected world and predicts another significant uptick in complexity. The author explains the Yuga cycles, including the transition periods, and asserts that humanity is 25 years into a 75-year transition to the Bronze Age. The text also criticizes the Khazarian Mafia for attempting to suppress this advancement and predicts a short-lived hyperinflation period. The author concludes that the transition to a new age is inevitable.

The text explores the shift from building tension language to release language, reflecting a change in societal dynamics. It discusses the increasing complexity and novelty in various aspects of life, such as parts shortages and the potential for on-demand production through 3D printing. The author emphasizes the transition into a new era marked by decentralized and diversified solutions, predicting that this trend will continue for the next 2100 years. The text concludes with the idea that the universe rewards novelty creation, and individuals can benefit from understanding and adapting to these changes.

Episode Summary:

The speaker addresses topics such as brittleness in fighting, cultural Marxism, and the arrest of Trump. They discuss their belief in a Khazarian Mafia that manipulates the Jewish population and criticize various historical narratives. They touch on mind control, secret space programs, and the manipulation of cultural dynamics. The speaker also alludes to the discovery of hidden truths, including space aliens, and the breaking down of deep state control. Towards the end, they briefly mention stopping for coffee and trying to download an app.

The text discusses a conspiracy theory involving the suppression of technology by the Khazarian Mafia, emphasizing a desire for control over humanity. The speaker believes in the existence of revolutionary technologies like water-powered cars and highly efficient engines, but argues that they are kept hidden to maintain the status quo. The author also mentions issues with current electric cars, blaming negative ions for reduced efficiency. They touch on societal changes that might emerge, including exposure to UFOs, as society moves beyond the control of the Khazarian Mafia. The overall tone is critical of this perceived secretive control over technology and human freedom.

The text posits various conspiracy theories including the existence of undersea bases and large-scale mining operations by non-humans. It discusses the alleged involvement of the Kazarean mafia with aliens seeking human abdominal fats. The text also claims that the consumption of seed oils, manipulated by aliens, causes a specific type of fat accumulation in humans. It further criticizes the peer review process in academic publishing, calling it flawed and biased. The text concludes by deriding authority and hierarchical structures, suggesting that they lack true understanding.

The speaker reflects on the idea that humans are being harvested by aliens, with a significant number of people going missing every year. The text also criticizes peer review and academia for hiding this information. The speaker seems to accept that space aliens may be involved in nefarious activities, including human trafficking. They express concern about how society will react as this information becomes more widely accepted, warning against naïve trust in aliens. The speaker suggests that people must be realistic about the potential dangers posed by extraterrestrials, understanding that their interests may not align with ours.

Episode Summary:

The text reflects on the author's day and emphasizes the shift from traditional advertising to a reputation economy. The author asserts that the trust people have in certain personalities drives economic activities, in contrast to the declining power of traditional advertising. They mention their own experience with selling Pure Sleep without hard-selling tactics, gaining trust. There's also a significant discussion about politics, the World Economic Forum's influence, election integrity, and corruption, ending with the idea that the federal government has lost its moral authority.

The text discusses the current disillusionment with mainstream media, politics, and traditional economic structures in the United States. It emphasizes the failure of the central banking system and the emergence of a new reputation economy. Traditional systems are portrayed as corrupt, including the law and electoral process. There's mention of individuals like Biden and companies like CNN being discredited. The speaker touches on personal legal battles and presents the idea of a "great reset," highlighting a shift away from traditional systems to new, decentralized, and individual-driven approaches, like cryptocurrencies, with a belief that a new era is dawning.

The text describes a complex legal battle in which the speaker strategizes against a corrupt judge. By leveraging the judicial procedure and placing pressure on the judge through calculated motions, including one for injunctive relief, the speaker is able to obtain a dismissal from the case. The speaker highlights corruption within the judicial system, using a specific case against Corey Good as an example, and emphasizes the need for strategy and understanding the procedure to succeed in legal matters. The speaker concludes by advising the reader to strategize meticulously before engaging in a court case.

Ep. 9 The Andrew Tate interview – 07-11-2023

Ep. 9 The Andrew Tate interview - 07-11-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

This piece discusses Tucker Carlson's criticism of perceived efforts to suppress masculine qualities in the United States and the broader impact on young boys. Highlighted is the controversial figure, Andrew Tate, who encourages self-improvement and masculinity, and was a major internet presence before being arrested in Romania, ostensibly for human trafficking. The allegations, accusing the Tates of coercing women into making monetized TikTok videos, are met with skepticism by Carlson, suggesting the charges might be a way to silence this counter-narrative. The piece ends by emphasizing the need to question such processes, pointing out that consent and free will can be undermined by state interventions.

The subject, named Andrew, has been incarcerated under serious charges which he claims are baseless. Accused of convincing girls to monetize their TikTok accounts, he maintains that there are no financial transactions linked to him. After seven months under house arrest, he was put in a Romanian jail for 92 days without any charge. Andrew suspects that the accusations of human trafficking against him, despite being baseless and denied by the alleged victims, are part of an attempt to slander his name due to his influence. The case is awaiting analysis by the Romanian judicial system.

Andrew Tate, currently residing in Romania, offers an introspective look at his experiences involving allegations of human trafficking, incarceration, and the subsequent toll on his mental health. Amidst the seriousness of the charges, he reflects on the ramifications on his life, highlighting the ease with which reputations are tarnished. He also emphasizes the changing public perception toward accusations, hinting at a society skeptical of truth in such cases. His stint in a Romanian prison was marked by harsh conditions, mental health issues, and his struggle to support his family from inside. Despite the dire situation, he remains hopeful, keeping his spirits up and valuing resilience above all else.

The discussion centers around the speaker's experiences in Romania amid geopolitical tensions and the role of the US embassy. The speaker, who is half British, half American, feels frustrated and homeless due to indifference from his home countries when he's accused of a crime in Romania. The speaker's controversial message of traditional masculinity is said to have led to his negative reception. This message advocates for men to have standards, boundaries, and to resist certain ideas. The speaker suggests that his influence poses a threat to those promoting 'slave programming', and he criticizes the weaponization of virtue against him. Despite adversity, he maintains that men should strive for virtuous relationships.

The speaker emphasizes the necessity of masculine excellence and self-improvement in a hyper-competitive world to resist societal pressures and manipulation. He criticizes individuals' blind acceptance of misleading information and encourages self-reflection, bravery, and non-compliance. He speaks about his personal belief in God and views life's challenges as divine tests to develop mental resilience. He argues that acknowledging and enduring pain and suffering can be formative experiences that shape a person's character. Lastly, he references Newton's law, implying that the presence of evil suggests the existence of an equal and opposite force of good, which he identifies as God.

The text describes the speaker's belief in God as a force of good in the world. They suggest there's a division in Western society between thinkers and those who unthinkingly follow trends, lacking a moral compass. They recount their personal experience during COVID, observing a nonchalant approach to the pandemic in Sweden compared to harsh lockdowns elsewhere. They express their shock at people's refusal to accept this contradictory reality. The speaker also discusses their legal troubles, believing they're targeted due to their controversial views that challenge mainstream narratives. They critique the UK for becoming increasingly authoritarian, a sharp departure from its reputation as a bastion of free speech.

The speaker criticizes UK's increasing legal impositions and deteriorating living conditions, including the fall in education standards and rise in crime rate. They argue Europe is dealing with similar issues, as governments focus more on suppressing voices discussing problems rather than addressing the issues themselves. They emphasize the disruption of power balances due to the feminization of native men and immigration of high testosterone men from the Third World, leading to a power vacuum. The speaker sees their personal legal troubles as a punishment for defiance against these societal changes. Despite legal troubles, they express love for Romania and believe that their predicament would have been the same anywhere in the Western world.

The speaker discusses the illusion of reality, comparing it to the Matrix, and the concept of agents keeping people from realizing the truth. They delve into the topic of how public perception is manipulated, using COVID as an example. The speaker stresses the importance of questioning narratives, discussing political events, including the situation in Ukraine and Russia, emphasizing that good and bad in wars aren't simple distinctions. They also recall their father, a chess master and former CIA linguist, whose predictions about the world's future, found in his Twitter feed, have proven prescient. Lastly, they argue that the U.S. interest in certain conflicts can be attributed to power and money.

The speaker discusses the perceived erosion of freedom and democracy, attributing it to powerful individuals or entities. He questions whether complying with societal norms and expectations genuinely leads to happiness or fulfillment, especially for men. He criticizes the current approach to men's mental health, advocating for a paradigm that includes pride and self-respect. He parallels his struggle to speak out against societal norms with a war, either against external injustices or internal discontentment. He emphasizes the importance of self-respect and dignity, and highlights his role as an influencer advocating for self-improvement, financial independence, and physical strength. He concludes by acknowledging potential repercussions but stands firm in his belief of benefiting the world.

The speaker reflects on the changing nature of media attacks and believes that these old tactics no longer work. They discuss their view on depression, arguing that it's a state of mind, not a condition, and how this belief has helped them maintain a resilient mindset. They suggest that depression is a tool for population control, preferring principled, energetic individuals. They also argue that depression is a sign that something in life needs to change, and transforming your life through hard work and dedication can alleviate feelings of depression. They emphasize the importance of having emotional motivation for significant tasks and change, and how discomfort can serve as a catalyst for self-improvement.

The text speaks about the necessity for men to change their mindset and confront their problems head-on, rather than succumbing to depression. The author emphasizes on the value of stoicism, self-improvement, and relentless competition, regardless of emotional state. It underlines the importance of maintaining a masculine support network and upholding principles of honor, hard work, and self-respect. It further criticizes societal norms that demotivate men and force them into loneliness, arguing that a man should be able to rely on himself and others' respect to navigate life successfully. It concludes by discussing the destructive effects of pornography and the misinterpretation of equal rights, contributing to the downfall of masculine virtue.

The speaker tackles issues of masculinity, sex, and porn addiction in today's globalized sexual marketplace. They advocate for "masculine excellence" as the answer to many of men's problems, including pornography addiction, loneliness, and being respected by peers. According to the speaker, men should strive to improve themselves rather than blaming societal conditions for their problems. They share their own journey from a difficult childhood to becoming a kickboxing world champion, emphasizing the importance of hard work, self-accountability, and dignity. The speaker also discusses the concept of leaving a lasting legacy, suggesting that success is not just a personal achievement, but also a responsibility towards one's family name.

The speaker discusses his views on women, emphasizing their power and his respect for them. He disagrees with the idea of unconditional compliance with women's wishes, arguing for a standard of mutual respect and accountability. He criticizes female promiscuity, arguing it has been historically and globally discouraged. The speaker claims he is often wrongly accused of misogyny due to his outspoken views and the misrepresentation of his content. He asserts that he has substantial support from women, contradicting the general accusation of him being misogynistic. The speaker also briefly discusses the issue of race, suggesting that societal elites are fueling racial division.

The speaker reflects on discrimination experienced due to being a straight male rather than due to his mixed race. He criticizes the victimhood narrative pushed by politicians like Kamala Harris, suggesting it's more destructive than empowering. Using examples from history, he dissects the global presence of slavery and argues that self-accountability, discipline, and hard work can propel anyone, regardless of race, to success. The speaker also appreciates physical fitness, especially for leaders, and shares his confusion at Joe Biden's popularity. Finally, he connects the hostility from a Wisconsin state senator to the issue of perpetual victimhood.

The speaker discusses the irony of a senator feeling oppressed and criticizing others for their better lives, indicating a division fueled by those in power. The speaker reveals his plans to become a climate change activist, acknowledging the hypocrisy of such a decision given his high-carbon lifestyle. He critiques the tokenistic meeting between Greta Thunberg and Zelensky, questioning its true purpose. Finally, he argues against climate change solutions that impose financial burdens on citizens and don't genuinely address the issue, calling such strategies 'Trojan horses'. He insists that his disagreement does not imply disregard for nature, but stems from a critical view of the legislation and the true intentions behind it.

The speaker discusses their charitable actions, and laments being judged negatively despite their efforts. They argue that strength, principles, and resilience are essential for doing good, while criticizing the modern culture's attack on "strong men" and promoting "weak men". They relate societal issues to weak men lacking emotional control, and committing destructive acts. The speaker also critiques mainstream media, the concept of 'fake news', and political incompetence, particularly referring to Putin and Biden. They link happiness with strength, arguing weak men can't be content. Lastly, they touch on women's roles as societal barometers, stating that women inherently desire strong men.

The text discusses societal expectations and issues from a male perspective. It argues that the decline of female happiness in the west is due to a lack of "real men" who can provide and protect, caused by societal decay and absence of morals and principles. The author expresses concerns over the impact of societal programming, suggesting women are more susceptible, leading to emotionally charged decisions. This susceptibility, coupled with the lack of strong, masculine leadership, allegedly leads to chaos and unhappiness in women's lives. Finally, the author warns against the societal push for female dominance, which he believes can be easily manipulated, leading to further societal issues.

The text explores diverse societal issues, centering on gender identity, societal expectations, and mental health. It challenges the concept of gender fluidity and the normalization of gender transitioning, suggesting a negative impact on mental health. It opposes the idea that gender is merely a social construct and highlights the distinct roles and strengths of both genders. It mentions how different cultures approach gender variance, as in the case of Thailand's "lady boys". The text voices concern over youth being pressured into life-altering decisions like gender reassignment, and the effect this could have on their future happiness. It emphasizes the importance of respecting biological realities and individual perceptions.

The text delves into various controversial subjects including identity, societal norms, cultural differences, and societal self-destruction. The author, who names himself King Andrew, criticizes Western societies for their supposed self-destructive tendencies, and their concern over identity politics and gender issues, which he perceives as distractions from real problems. He draws comparisons to the fall of Rome to underscore his point. Furthermore, he discusses the influence of the Internet and state on children, arguing for the right to instill his own values in his offspring. Lastly, he expresses concerns about the targeting of children by ideologies he sees as dangerous, suggesting a need for protection.

The speaker challenges notions of western patriarchy and criticizes ideologies that use manipulation, particularly of susceptible children, to spread their views. They argue that this approach, used by various factions including LGBTQ proponents, is akin to brainwashing and is unfair compared to challenging an informed adult. They link the proliferation of such ideas to a lack of real struggle in the west, implying that many seek out problems due to the relative comfort of their lives. Finally, they suggest that harsher conditions, such as a famine, would quickly dissolve these constructed issues and roles, with people reverting to traditional survival strategies.

The speaker argues for respecting men's role in protecting society, emphasizing historical gender roles as survival necessities. They challenge modern shifts towards feminizing men as untested, raising concerns about national competitiveness. The speaker endorses a high-protein diet, caffeine, and nicotine, associating the latter with testosterone and resistance to conformity. They theorize that society seeks to reduce testosterone to make men more compliant. Lastly, the speaker voices fears about the rise of digital currencies, viewing them as tools for total societal control, noting their potential use in tracking, and controlling spending habits, and expressing worry about the phasing out of physical cash.

The speaker shares his beliefs about societal control through financial dependency, suggesting this is the real reason behind his unpopularity. He argues that the government doesn't want its citizens financially independent because it's easier to control destitute people. The speaker challenges the perception of wealth as negative and suggests his financial success offers resistance to manipulation. He encourages his young followers to seek wealth and resist societal control. The speaker also claims governments desire absolute control over their citizens, likening it to a slow encroachment towards communism. He emphasizes the importance of a financially independent populace to resist this control.

#1950s #60s #6thGradeBoys #Accountability #Accusations #Adam #Adult #AfghanDefenseForce #Aggression #America #AmericanCitizen #AmericanInfluence #AndrewTate #AncestorPride #Arrogant #Attack #Authoritarian #Aztecs #Backbone #Balance #Barriers #Bathrooms #BBC #BeachfrontProperty #Belief #Benefit #Bigot #Bills #BlackSea #Blackbillionaire #Boundary #Boundaries #Brainwashing #Bravery #Bribe #British #BritishAmericanGovernments #BritishParliament #Brother #Bugatti #Burma #Camouflage #Camaraderie #Capitalism #CaptiveAudience #CarbonFootprint #Care #Case #Castration #Caucasian #Censorship #Change #charges #Chaucescu #Cheat #Chessmaster #Children #CIA #ClimateChangeActivist #ClimateChangeAwareness #Communism #Competition #Compliance #Consequences #Conviction #Coercion #Control #Controlled #ConversionTherapy #Corruption #Court #CourtCases #Cowardice #COVID #Crimea #CrimeRate #CriticalThinking #Cryptocurrency #Cuba #CulturalDifferences #Culture #Currency #Destructive #Defend #Defiance #Depressed #Depression #Destiny #DestructiveMindset #Dignity #Discipline #Discrimination #Dishonesty #Disparity #Diversity #Donation #Duty #EarlyWarningSystem #EconomicClass #EducationSystem #Emotion #EmotionalCoercion #EmotionalControl #EmotionalSecurity #EmotionalStability #EmpiricalEvidence #Enemy #Energy #EnergyCrisis #Englishflags #Englishman #Eunuchs #Europe #Evidence #Evil #EvolutionaryStandards #Exceptional #ExceptionalMan #Exercise #Expensive #FalseAccusations #FalseNarratives #Family #FarmAnimals #Father #FeedingChildren #FemaleHappiness #FeminineWoman #Feminism #Feminize #FinancialCrime #FinancialFreedom #FinancialProvision #FinancialSuccess #FinancialTransaction #ForeignCountry #FormativeExperiences #France #Fraud #FreeSpeech #Freedom #GenderAffirmingCare #GenderDifferences #GenderDysphoria #GenderIdentity #GenderRoles #God #Good #GoodGuy #Google #GretaThunberg #Guilt #Gym #Happiness #HardWork #HatePeddling #HeinousActs #Honor #Hope #House #HouseArrest #Hypocrisy #HyperCompetition #HyperCompetitive #Ideology #Ignorance #Impulsiveness #Incompetence #Individuals #Indoctrination #Influence #Influencer #Injustice #Innocence #Insanity #Internet #InternetArguments #InternetInfluence #Investigation #Invasion #IslamicLaw #IslamicWorld #Jail #JeffreyEpstein #Job #JoeBiden #Judges #Judgment #JulianAssange #JusticeMachine #KamalaHarris #KennedysMotorcade239 #KickboxingWorldChampion #KingAndrew #LadyBoys #Language #Law #Lawyer #Leadership #Legacy #LegalSystem #LGBTQ #Life #Lies #Linguist #LivingStandards #Loneliness #LongFormatContent #Longing #Love #LoveLetters #LoverBoyMethod #Lucy #Lukashenko #MaleSupportNetwork #MalleablePopulace #Marriage #MasculineExcellence #MasculineHappiness #MasculineIssues #MasculineMan #MasculineRole #Masculinity #Media #MediaAttack #MediaCoverage #MediaMachine #Medialaws #Medication #Men #MensMentalHealth #MentalChange #MentalHealth #MentalHealthProblems #MentalResilience #MentalState #Message #Migration #Mind #Mindset #MingDynasty #Misogynist #Misogyny #Misogynyaccusations #MixedRace #Morality #Motivation #Myanmar #Narrative #NationalSecurity #NatureConservation #NatureOfPeople #Negativity #NewsConsumer #NonCompliance #Obey #Obedience #Oppression #Outlawed #Outofcontext #Pain #Pandemic #Parameters #Patriarchy #Penalties #Perception #Performance #PhysicalCondition #PhysicalProtection #PhysicalStrength #PickupTruck #Playbook #Police #Porn #PornStar #Power #PowerGrab #PowerVacuum #Pride #PrideFlags #Principled #Principles #Prison #Programming #Propaganda #Protection #PTSD #Public #PublicConsciousness #Punishment #Putin #Question #Rational #Rebellion #Relationship #Resentment #Resist #Resistance #Respect #Responsibilities #Rich #RichCountry #RobertFKennedy #Romania #RomanianJudicialSystem #RomanianPopulation #RomanianPrison #Rome #Sarajevo #Saying #Security #Senator #Sex #SexCrime #SexualAccess #SexualEducation #SexualMarketplace #SexualOrientation #SexualRelationships #SickCountry #Silence #SingleMotherHousehold #Slander #Slavery #SlaveProgramming #SocialMedia #Society #SocietalDecay #SocietalDestruction #SocietalExpectations #SocietalNorms #SocietalPolarity #SocietalRoles

Ep. 9 The Andrew Tate interview - 07-11-2023

Hey, it's Tucker Carlson. Imagine being a 6th grade boy in the United States right now. What are you hearing at school? What are they telling you on the Internet? Well, they're telling you to stop being yourself.

Sit still, stop joking. Suppress your aggression. Share your feelings. Obey. Female qualities are virtuous.

Masculine qualities are oppressive. That's the message. In case it wasn't clear enough, schools around the country have removed urinals from boys bathrooms. The male body itself is shameful. Sit down when you pee, like a good little girl.

Views like this are often called feminism or woke politics, but in fact they amount to mass conversion therapy, an attempt to change the fundamental nature of people. Nothing like this has ever been attempted at scale. It's one of the most grotesque and destructive experiments in human history. What would it be like to find yourself the subject of that experiment as a boy trying to become a man during the biden years? Well, you might kill yourself.

Many have. You might decide to reject your own manhood and embrace androgyny or even switch sexes. Girls are better. Fine, I'll become one. Or more likely, you might simply withdraw into porn and weed and video games and give up on your life before it's begun.

You might retire at 19, a less dramatic form of suicide. All around us, this is happening. Noticing it is forbidden. But that does not make it any less real. So it's probably not surprising that Andrew Tate was the most Googled man in the world last year.

He offers a different vision. Tate is a former professional kickboxer who, about a decade ago, began posting advice to young men on social media. Tate's view is that men want respect above all. It's how they're wired. In order to get respect, men must become worthy of it.

They must become more impressive. Wake up early. Work as hard as you can. Stay sober. Find God.

Keep yourself physically fit. Don't complain that's his worldview. Earlier generations of Western leaders might have found parts of Tate's message inspiring. Now it's seen as a threat. The media treated him like a criminal up until the day he was officially classified as one.

Just after Christmas last year, tate and his brother Tristan were arrested and thrown into prison in Romania, where they live. The Tates were held without charges for three months, very likely with the encouragement of the British and American governments. In June, they were charged with human trafficking. They're now under house arrest until their trial. Are the Tates guilty of human trafficking?

We're not their lawyers, but it's worth noting that as of today, not a single woman has come forward to say that she was kidnapped or imprisoned or moved across international borders against her will by Andrew or Tristan Tate. It's also true that in some ways, the charges against the Tates seem inevitable, like they were always going to happen. Accusing a man of a sex crime is the fastest possible way to discredit what he's saying. Days after WikiLeaks revealed that the US government had been spying on its allies and lying about it, julian Assange was arrested in London for rape. Nine years later, prosecutors dropped the case against Assange for lack of evidence, though somehow that fact was not as widely covered.

Is that what's happening here? Again, we don't know. Jeffrey Epstein's dinner partners insist that Andrew Tate is a pervert and a criminal. Maybe they're telling the truth. Either way, we think Tate's views about men very much deserve a hearing.

So we flew to Romania to talk to him. We're posting the entire interview here on Twitter because we've been assured it will not be taken down for ideological reasons, as so much of his content has been. The video is long, but if you can take the time to watch it, make up your own mind about Andrew Tate. Here it is. So what are you charged with?

That's a really good question. I'm charged with being the head of an organized criminal group which is in charge of recruiting girls to make TikTok videos to steal the money from the TikTok views. Recruiting girls to make TikTok videos and stealing the money. So it's really a financial crime? It looks that way.

And it's very interesting because the girls who they've identified to add to the file are saying that we're not victims of anything and this isn't true. But the state believes it's true. And the state thinks that I, as a 35 year old man, woke up, I was already extremely financially successful. I was already a father, I was already very well known. I had no financial motivation.

I have no criminal record. It's not my personality profile. But I woke up the age of 35 and decided to make girls do TikTok to enrich myself with the pennies that I would earn from TikTok views. So in the United States, I think the belief is that you were charged with human trafficking. Yeah, that's human trafficking, because what you do is you force a girl to work against her will for financial gain.

That's human trafficking. And their justification for this is that girls do TikTok. Some girls I know, who they found, who say they're not victims, have TikTok accounts. How do you force someone to do TikTok videos? I guess the prosecutor is going to have to explain that, isn't he?

It's a very interesting scenario I'm in, and I'm inside of Romania, so I have to show a degree of respect to the Romanian judicial system, and I have to show a degree of respect to the situation I'm in. But the overall charge is that there's an organized criminal group. There's a group of us. I'm the head of it. My brother is the below me.

And we use the lover boy method to convince women to do TikTok videos to make money so that we can steal the TikTok money so there's no just to be clear, you are not accused of pandering, of pimping, forcing women to have sex with anybody? No, not forcing to have sex, not restraining their movement, not stopping them from living a full life, but the fact that we are somehow convincing them to have TikTok, very interesting. I don't think but there's no actual I'm asking you this because I do think it's a widespread belief that you were accused of pimping. Yeah. That has nothing to do with any of this case.

Absolutely nothing. And it's kind of scary, because the crime in itself of human trafficking is a unique one, because they can ignore the statement of the victim. So the girls have come forward and said, this is insane. You've just picked us because we're near andrew and we're his friends. But the whole idea of the crime is they can say that she's brainwashed.

Right. She's under duress. So you can ignore her statement. State says she's a victim regardless of the fact that she says she's not a victim. So it's very interesting because the difference between sex and rape is consent.

Right, right. But they remove all of that. They're like, nope, you're a victim. No matter what you say, we're deciding you're a victim. And they've chosen them.

And of course, these girls do nothing pornographic. They've never had sex with anyone, nothing to do with that. So they've picked TikTok. So it's scary. Imagine you're a full grown man anywhere in the world today, they can find two girls who have TikTok on their phone, which is every single female on the planet, and they can accuse you of forcing them to take the TikTok money.

And even if the girls say they didn't do that, this isn't true, then you're still a human. But force, what does that consist of? Forcing someone to do something? Are they accusing you of using violence? No, they're accusing me and this thing they're accusing me of using the lover boy method, coercing them by being nice.

By the way, these charges presumably are public, so they're public, and this is extremely serious, but if you actually analyze the overall case against me, they're saying that andrew and his brother, by being nice men, convinced girls to have TikTok accounts and then take the money. And it's very interesting, because inside of the entire case file, there's not a single financial transaction to us for money. What are the penalties? They're extremely severe. Five to ten years in jail.

And I've already served coming up now, seven months in a form of jail. They can only you are essentially incarcerated right now. Absolutely. I'm on house arrest, and that counts as jail. You can only be held six months without charge.

I was initially picked up, thrown in a cell without charge, and I think the intention of the entire investigation at that point was to find the crime, because they had very, very weak evidence. They contacted 2000 people who know me or knew me. They tried very hard to convince some female somewhere to come forward and say something bad about me. The media machine, which works hands in hands with the justice machine, as you know very well, did exactly that. In fact, they offered bribes.

Effectively. They'd call up ex girlfriends and say, if you have anything bad to say about Andrew, we can pay you $50,000 for the story. And they tried very hard. They didn't find any evidence of anything. They then released me on house arrest.

And then two days before the legal limit in which they had to drop everything, they charged me with whatever they had from the beginning, which is very little. And now we have to wait for the Romanian judicial system to analyze the file and, God willing, throw it away. How long did you spend in jail? I was in jail for 92 days in a Romanian jail cell. What was that like?

It was certainly interesting experience. I won't lie and say it was easy. It was certainly very difficult, the uncertainty of it. It's a very uncertain situation to be picked up on just before New Year's Eve and thrown in a cell without charge. And I'm asking different prison guards and different prisoners, how long am I going to be here?

One prisoner is like, I've been here two years. I was like, have you been charged? He goes, yeah, but I haven't gone to court yet. Like, everyone's been there for years. I thought I was going to be there for years.

And it certainly takes a mental toll on you. And I think jail is a different experience when you know you're innocent. When there was a guy in there for murder, he's like, yeah, I murdered someone. I'm in jail. You can kind your soul and your mind accept the punishment for a crime, but when you've actually done nothing wrong, I think jail is a lot harder.

Did you know why you were there? Not initially. So for about the first two weeks, I never actually got told in English what I was accused of because I was arrested on December 29. There's new York. What were the circumstances of that?

Yeah, December, armed guards ran in this house. They spent all day searching the entire house. They were very interested in electronics, as most federal agencies are. And then they took me that evening and said, we're going to go and put you in jail for 24 hours. And after 24 hours, you see a judge, and the judge will decide if you stay in jail.

And the judge decided I should. What did you do? I mean, did you make who'd you call? I had a lawyer, and my lawyer came and he said, we need to analyze the case file. When you see what they have against you, you're being accused of human trafficking.

It's like, human trafficking? That's insane. Who? When? What?

I went to jail. And then I was given all this paper in Romanian. I don't speak Romanian, although I live here. And then I was waiting for the translation. So I think it's about two weeks before I finally got the papers in English to understand why I was in a jail cell.

And then I really understood how insane the accusations were. What is human trafficking? Yeah. So the overall, my understanding of it, they're saying that human trafficking is when you convince a woman to do something she doesn't want to do for financial gain. And there's different methods.

You can do that. You can do that through force, and you can also do that through emotional coercion. I think most people, just speaking from the American perspective, most people believe that human trafficking is effectively slavery, selling human beings. And that's what I believe as well. Absolutely.

And this is the thing that's so interesting. When you finally end up the enemy of the matrix and they use the legal system as a weapon to punish you for having an opinion, you realize how subjective the law is, right? Because it can be a weapon when you have something subjective. You can just pick and choose. So if they sit and say, ah, human trafficking is a woman doing something for financial gain against her will via emotional coercion.

Well, he knows these two girls. They have TikTok, emotional coercion, convincing her that's what I'm accused of because they have no proof of me doing anything wrong. So they said, he's convinced these girls to do TikTok for money. The girls have said themselves have said this is not true, and the state is denying their statement, saying, no, you're brainwashed, it is true, and I went to jail. So how is the state so the state is trying to coerce the women.

So how is the state not committing human trafficking by the same definition? Absolutely. It's very interesting. It's very interesting that you can sit someone down and tell them they're a victim when they say they're not a victim. You're a victim of being coerced, and we're going to try to coerce you into conceding you were coerced.

Exactly. It's a very interesting scenario. Okay. Yeah, it's a very interesting scenario. Up until this point, no judge has looked at the evidence of the case.

So up until this point, I've been to court a bunch of times, but the only reason I was in court was to discuss my preventative detention. So under Romanian law, if you being free can impede the investigation, you should stay in jail. So the judge agreed that, yeah, maybe if he's free, he can damage this investigation because they're trying very hard to get something on this guy. So I've done a bunch of jail time, and now it just begins. The judge is going to look at the case and like I said, God willing, I still have enough faith in the Romanian judicial system that she's going to look at this and go, this is not a crime.

You're aware of the media coverage of this, however, so you're in jail for 90 days or more, and the rest of the world is talking about you. Do you know what they're saying? They're saying very heinous things. And I would hate to come across as a conspiracy theorist, Tucker, but I kind of have a feeling that this might be something to do with my influence and an attempt to slander my name. Perhaps I'm crazy, but the fact that they chose such a heinous crime and they reported it so heavily, and they won't shut up and keep repeating, basically a slander attack day after day after day.

Also, considering the fact that other people who genuinely commit heinous crimes have far more favorable press coverage, I don't want you to think I'm a conspiracy theorist. Please, Tucker, I would hate for you to come here and call me crazy, but something very strange about it, and I think the what, when Jeffrey Epstein's friends call you Immoral yeah. The goal of it is certainly to slander my name, and I like to see it as a litmus test. I like to see it as an intelligence test. Anybody who wakes up and looks at me and goes, he's a human trafficker.

Because of TikTok, they're fully gone. But from the west, just to defend the average news consumer in the west, sure. Andrew Tate kind of an outlaw, lives in some palace in Romania, wherever that is. And Romania sounds like the kind of place where human trafficking is like the main industry. A lot of it happens here.

That's what's so crazy about it. Right. What's so crazy is, if they really want to find a human trafficker, I think they could probably do it quite easily, but they managed to get me. That's certainly the perception, but it's one of those charges that kind of sells itself. Oh, absolutely.

And it doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not, right. You're a human trafficker forever. But I do think that public consciousness is changing. I think with things like, there's been some very large court cases recently involving some very famous people in which women were caught lying, trying to slander men's names for rape and these kinds of things, and I don't think people believe it anymore. But that scares me to a degree, because I think that the typical weapon, the standardized playbook is now failing.

And know what the new playbook is going to be? Almost like better the devil. You know that you're too famous, you're too successful. We don't like you. Call him a rapist or a human trafficker, put him all over the news, slander his name, try and wreck his life.

Now that nobody believes it, what's the next move? What are they going to try next? Wouldn't it just have been easier to commit, like, a massive financial crime and defraud people of billions come up with like a fake cryptocurrency, call it like, I don't know, FTX, or just give a name to it and then random steal billions and get your parents involved and buy a bunch of real estate in the Bahamas. And then you'd be sort of a hero, right? Oh, absolutely.

And I would have certainly made a lot more money than TikTok because I don't think TikTok even pays you for views. And if it certainly does, I never got a single transaction from it. So it's a very interesting scenario. But if I was accused of a financial crime, my name would not be slandered. No, well, of course not.

You have the presumption of innocence. So just back to the jail thing. So you're in with your brother? At the beginning I was not, but towards the end I was. Yeah.

What did you do all day? It's a good question. I looked at the wall, stared at the wall, smoked cigarettes, lots of push ups, read the Quran. You smoked cigarettes, did push ups and read the Quran? Basically, yes.

And certainly had some introspective moments. Tried my best to get out. Tried my best to, via my small phone calls, understand what's happening in the outside world. Tried to make sure that the people I love and care about are taken care of. Because I'm the man of my family.

And I'm also the man of quite a large I wouldn't say empire, but life. And there's a whole lot of people who rely on me. You have staff and families, you have children and family feeling. Yeah. So when you're plucked from that, it's kind of strange.

You're in jail and you're concerned for yourself, but your primary concerns are also all your duties as a man. I have duties as a man. I don't want children to starve. You've got a whole tribe. I've got people to pay.

So it was very, very frustrating. Constantly trying to make sure everybody else was okay and feeling helpless. That's what hurt me the most. I was trying to make sure everybody I love and care about was fine and I wasn't as powerful as I should have been. And that was very upsetting.

And especially if they were going to keep me there for years, I was having serious concerns about how I can feed the people I love. Did you ever come to the edge at all? No. I certainly had. Some days I was less happy than others, but I made sure that my mindset was built in a way that I could always be doing something constructive.

And also, I think you get what you give in life. And if I ever felt particularly sad on a day, I would try very hard to make other people happy, because if I made other people smile, I'd feel better. So even the dinner ladies or the prison guards, I'd try very hard just to make people smile. I know it sounds silly, some of the prison guards some of the prison guards were more open than others. But there was a couple of prison guards who were ice cold, who didn't want to say a word to me and like, hey, bro, your hair looks amazing, and you just stare at me like, he wants shut up.

But I just try my best to cheer people up, to cheer myself up. And as a man, all you can do is just find the resolve to continue. You doing the best you can in this current circumstance. What were the other prisoners like? I don't want to insult Romania in any way.

And I love this country and I chose to live here. But if I had to describe it for the people, for an American audience to understand, I don't think Romania and a lot of these countries have the same kind of mental health set up or the mental health support that a lot of Western nations have. So you end up in jail. So I think there was a lot of mental health problems inside the jail. So it was very similar.

It wasn't just a jail. There was also a lot of mental health problems in there, which adds a new complexity and a new dimension to the suffering, because there's just random screaming and there's suicide, and it's certainly not a very nice place to be. Oh, so it's horrifying. Yeah. I don't want to go back.

You hear the phrase Romanian prison, and it sounds tough, so it was what you would imagine it is. And when this process is over, there's a lot more I will say. But I will say the staff were very nice to me. And I want to make this clear. I want to make it very clear that all the staff in the jail were very professional and very nice to me.

I would almost say that they believed I was innocent and they understood that I didn't belong there. There was a semi apologetic vibe to the way I was treated by the guards, if that makes sense. Yes, they understood very well. I don't think anybody, like I said, with a functioning brain, believes that me, at the age of 35, decided to steal TikTok money and ruin my entire life without financial motivation to girls who say they're not victims of anything. I don't think anybody with a brain well, the fact that you're not accused of a sex crime or of violence, which I think most people don't really understand, and they can look it up, but you're not actually accused of rape.

Correct. Selling anyone? Correct. Pimping. Correct.

Okay. That right there raises a lot of questions. Yeah. And this is the thing that's so interesting, because I'm accused of using a method of human trafficking called the lover boy method. So how that would traditionally work is a man would meet a girl, become her boyfriend, take her to another country, turn her into a prostitute say, I love you like pimping, of course.

But they're saying because all my conversations with these girls are very nice, they're saying that I use the lover boy method to convince them to do TikTok. And once again, I never made a penny from TikTok, and I have no interest in girls TikTok accounts, and I've never made any money from TikTok in my life. So that right there, I think we can let people assess. I'm not an expert on the Romanian legal code, but that's kind of not the impression that most people have, and that's the media who have made that very the media have tried very hard to do that. And if I had to estimate, I think that the overall intention was just to throw me in a cell, use the media machine to drum up something real.

I think that's what the goal was. I believe that obviously one thing I've never been to Romania before, and one thing I'm struck by is the American presence here. Oh, it's massive. Fully understand that. So there are three NATO bases here now.

They're bustling because of the war in Ukraine, one's on the Black Sea, right below Crimea. So this is strategically important, this country, to NATO. Absolutely. And so this is a lot less far away than I realized. It's much more American influence.

Oh, absolutely. Played a role. Yeah. Well, I think, and I don't want to get this incorrect, I think it's the second or third biggest US embassy in the world. The US embassy here looks like a prison.

It's huge. They've got a huge embassy here. And even during Chaucescu, during the communism days, romania was an ally of the west. Even during communism? Yes.

Chaucescu came to New York. Yes, that's right. Yeah. So Romania and America have been very good friends for a very long time.

I have to be careful what I say, but it's certainly very interesting what's happened to me. The American embassy were not particularly helpful, let's put it that way. They weren't very interested in me being locked up without charge. They didn't seem very interested in getting me out. But you're an American citizen.

Absolutely. So you're an American passport holder. Correct. So I think the average American believes, perhaps falsely, that if you're accused of a crime in a foreign country, particularly a less developed country like Romania, you go to the US embassy and someone takes an interest in your case just to make sure that your treatment falls within accepted standards of justice. Yeah, they came to see me, but when I was asking them what they can actually do about all of this, they weren't particularly helpful.

I don't want to pedal conspiracy theories, and I've heard a lot of information, et cetera, but I wouldn't say they sanctioned it. I don't know if they had to sanction it, but something they weren't particularly interested in getting me out, but at least they came to see me more than once. I mean, they kind of pretended to care. The UK Embassy didn't even pretend to care. The UK embassy was I really think they enjoyed it.

You're a British subject as well. Correct. And this is the kind of thing, and I want to say this here, that's kind of frustrating for me, because Romania is my home now for seven years. But I'm half British, half American originally, and when something like this happens to you, you have this longing for home. You kind of want to go home when you end up in a jail in a country where, even though you've lived for a long time, you don't speak the language, you don't understand the legal system.

Going to court in a foreign language is far more intimidating than in your own language. You don't have a clue what's being said, you don't understand how anything works. And then you kind of have this longing for home. But I feel like my home countries hate me and they hate me because of my message, which I believe to be a positive message. So you kind of have this strange feeling of homelessness, because it's like, well, if I go to the UK, I believe they're going to attack me the same.

If I go to America, I believe they're going to attack me the same. So where do you go? It's kind of scary. Where do you go? Good question.

We're going to have to see it. How did you wind up here? I moved to Romania. I came to visit a long time ago, before anybody ever visited Romania. I came to visit and I genuinely fell in love with the place.

It truly is a fantastic country. I love nature as an amazing nature. It's a very safe place. It has this reputation of being dangerous. It's not dangerous, it's very safe.

The people are very good. The people are very conservative. Traditionally, it's almost like America was 2030 years ago. It's gorgeous. They have a bunch of nice restaurants and plenty of things to do.

And I've never had a problem here in any way, never had any issue with the law or with the other side criminals, nothing, until this came out of nowhere. So it's been very strange. So what is it about your message? Do you think that infuriates certain people? Well, my message is traditional masculinity.

My message is to stand up and say what you mean and mean what you say. And even going to the gym nowadays is an act of defiance, because when you have a man who's built with any degree of principle, you say no to things. And I think if I have to analyze my message and why I'm so disliked by the people who dislike me, it's not the things I'm saying, it's the fact that if you adhere to my principles and you adhere to the things I say, you end up being the kind of person who. Will resist certain ideas. You say no.

What kind of man never says no? Name? A man who never says no. Men say no, right? Men wake up and say, no.

I don't think that should be done this way. No, my children will not be taught that. No father's primary job. Absolutely. So when you say to men, listen, you're allowed to have an opinion, you're allowed to have standards, you're allowed to have boundaries and barriers.

You're allowed to get up and become important and work hard and try hard and become the kind of man who can't be controlled, then you're seen as an enemy. And especially with the massive influence I've gained, I think they look at me and go, ah, he's helping men resist the slave programming. We don't need him around. We need to empty their brains so we can inject the slave programming and convince men to be eunuchs. Because once you're eunuched, then you're not a threat.

I think I buy that, because your message I'm not the world's expert on your message, but I've seen a lot of it, and it's not explicitly political, actually. No, it's not political at all. And their original attack before this Matrix attack is they weaponized virtue, which is what they usually do. There's no genuine virtue inside of these people. They weaponize virtue.

They find a virtue and they turn it to a bullet and they shoot at you. I'm sure you know very well. Yeah, I've heard. Yeah, I was a misogynist for the longest time just for saying that men should have standards. If you tell a man he could have standards in a relationship in any way, you're a misogynist.

It's actually very interesting because what does that mean, to have standards in a relationship? But this is the thing that's so interesting about it, because they've gendered the argument when I never did. I said, as a man, you shouldn't have a girlfriend who is a liar and a cheater, and you also shouldn't have male friends who are liars and cheaters. You shouldn't be around dishonest people, male or female men, and they gendered it and said, he's a misogynist. He's saying that men should only act this way with women, et cetera.

I said that men should have standards and you should have protocols that you're prepared to accept and you should have hard parameters. And if a woman doesn't want to adhere to those parameters, that's her decision and it's her prerogative. But you don't have to stay with her. Why should you? What's wrong with that?

Well, that's teaching men to say no. They don't want men to say no. So are you arguing that it's better to be with a virtuous woman? I think so, yes. I know that's.

No, I'm serious.

It seems like good advice. I don't want to come across as extreme, but yes, I am. And what's actually funny is I really believe most of the things I'm saying were accepted by absolutely everybody 15 years ago, ten years ago, and now it's public enemy number one. And it's because of the mass influence I have. At one point.

I became the most Googled man on Earth at one point. And it's a scary situation I'm in if you're arguing that it's really important for a man to find a good woman, a decent woman, an honest woman, that's the truest thing that's ever been said. Absolutely. That's the most important thing any man can do. I mean, I can just tell you firsthand, oh, thank you very much.

Married 32 years, that's the most important thing. And you think saying that anger to people? Absolutely, because I'm arguing the only way to do that is via masculine excellence. I'm saying in the world we live in today, it's hyper competitive. And if you want to be the kind of man that has the choice of women to choose a good one, you need to be an excellent man.

It's no longer acceptable for you to just be an average Joe or below average. You have to get up and you have to work hard and you have to be smart and interesting and you have to be charismatic and make some money and be in good shape, and you have to try very hard. And unfortunately for them, if you follow that path as a man and you become successful in those realms, you end up being the kind of person who resists enslavement. You become the kind of person who wakes up and says, no, I don't believe in that. That doesn't make sense to me.

I can't imagine a better message than that if you want a good society. So then you have to argue and sit and say, do these people want a happy, functioning society or do they want something else? What do you think? I think that I would never kill myself. And I also just throwing that out there.

And I also think that when you want to conquer a society, you kill the military aged males. That's what you do. That's the first thing they've ever done. They walk in and all the men have to have their throats cut. They can't perhaps do that, but they can certainly cut your balls off, and then you can't resist.

And I think there's certainly a movement to ensure that there's very little resistance left inside of the number one demographic which is required to resist oppression, which are military age males. And they don't want those kind of people waking up with any kind of self respect or standards or to say, no, I don't accept this. I do not need a 9th injection. They don't want that. They want you to sit and say, I don't need it.

But the news said so. Oh, well. So in the one interview that you and I did, you had a line that I've been thinking about ever since. I thought it was so interesting. I never thought of it before.

You said that a lot of people went along with the facts and that you didn't judge them because facts change. But now that we know that a lot of what we were told was wrong and some of it was a lie, it is a requirement of your own dignity, of your own self respect to say so completely and people should apologize. I really do believe, and I have nothing against the people who fell for the propaganda and I fell for the programming. Yes, I agree. Fine.

But you should wake up and say, I was fooled. I've learned my lesson. I will not be fooled again. But if you were fooled by the MSM and took the injection and you continued to be fooled and you have not self reflected and you have not realized that they lied to you the entire way and you now believe the new bunch of lies are all over the television, then there's something wrong with you. Or you don't care that you were lied to.

You don't care that you were lied to because you I think a lot of this is actually genuinely cowardice. I think it's a very easy worldview. The life is easier if you accept the news tells the truth. Yes, everything they want me to believe is true. Everything's nice and simple, good guys, bad guys do.

And if you want to actually wake up, it takes a degree of bravery because then you have to destroy your entire worldview, everything you've ever understood and everything you're told, and you have to really look at the world and go, oh, this is a mess. And that takes bravery. And once again, that's why they don't want men to be brave. They want you to sit there and go, oh, it's easier if just, you know, CNN said so. It must be true.

And it's cowardice. And they're trying to instill cowardice in all of us. That's what they're trying very hard to do. And I think even just me as a person, the people who hate me, my detractors, who dislike me so much, even if I say nothing, I just turn up, big, bald, strong, fast car. It's just me.

I'm like the enemy to them because I symbolize men who don't comply and not don't comply in a negative, law breaking way, but don't comply. If we don't agree with that or we don't see common sense in that, we're going to politely decline. And that's simply not allowed. What's it like to have the prospect of prison hanging over you? I think that I like to believe that this is a test from God.

I like to believe that if you become the most Googled man in the world for saying that you have mental resilience, that God is going to make sure you don't have that degree of fame without testing you. I like to believe that God comes along and says, yes, I've allowed you to become the top g. We're going to see if you really are the top g. I believe that's how the world works. It's certainly intimidating, especially knowing you're completely innocent, but I believe it's a test, and I believe it's my job to pass the test for my ancestors and for people watching over me and for God.

And I think I have to do the absolute best I can possibly do in the scenario and the circumstance. Regardless of whether I win or lose, I still believe I'm going to win because I've seen the case file and I've seen that no laws have been broken. But even in the very unfortunate circumstance that this Matrix attacks goes deep enough to throw me into a jail cell, I think I should handle it like a man. I think I should stay and finish the process and I should walk with my head held high and suffer as much as I need to suffer to stick by my convictions and know that I'm an innocent person. And I refuse to break, I refuse to cry, I refuse to be depressed about it.

I'm going to wake up and I'm going to smile regardless. And regardless of what happens to me, I want everyone to know that, one, I would never kill myself, and two, I think that as a man, there's always going to be a degree of pain and suffering in your journey. I don't think you're ever going to become a successful man or be good at being a man without pain and suffering. And there's many times in my life where something terrible happened to me. And at the time, if I could change it, I would have.

But retrospectively, you kind of look back and go, you know what? That was formulative for me. That's right. That is what God decided I needed to become who I became. So all of the pain and all the suffering I've ever gone through in my life ended up, in the end, building me into the person I am.

And I'm proud of who I am. So if God decides I need to go back to a Romanian dungeon for however many days, then all I can do is accept it and accept his plan and accept that it's going to make me a better person. So you see the hand of God in your life? Absolutely. I think that he is the best of planners.

And like I said, if you retrospectively analyze all the times in life you wish you could have changed things, he knew better, and I'm going to have to accept that. When did you conclude that? I think I guess I always kind of knew I was atheistic for a while when I was younger. But as you get older, you start to look at the world and understand that the thing for me was actually, I guess, a scientific principle. It was Newton's law of equal and opposite force.

If there is evil in the world, and I'd like to think we both agree there certainly is. Yes, there has to be an equal and opposite force which is good. And I would like to think of that as God, even the idea of God as a notion, even just as a concept, if that idea of God resists evil, then God is real. If you have two islands, you have two people, let's say a ship crashes and you have two people who swim to two different islands, and one island, they're atheists savages, and they rip you apart, and the other island, you get there and they believe in God, and they believe they're not allowed to kill you. Even just their idea of God, god saved your life.

So I think even just a concept of God in and of itself, if enough people believe and it makes them do good, then God must be true. And that's the equal and opposite force to the evil of the world. And this is how I view it. So I don't see how anybody with a conscience cannot believe in God anymore. That's such a profoundly different worldview from the one that we're presented with, I think.

Do you think that's maybe the division in the west between people who see those forces at work and those who don't, I think the west is actually split between people who think and people who don't think at all. I think that people there there are there's no such thing as these two opposing worldviews. I think people believe there's worldview A and worldview B. I disagree with that. I think there's worldview a the good guys, which are primarily people who do believe in God, do have parameters, do believe in standards, do believe in self respect, do know how to say no, and there's worldview B, which changes day by day regarding based on what they're told, which means they have no real worldview at all.

They just repeat, and they have no standards, and they have no parameters. There's nothing you can tell them that will make them wake up and go, that's wrong, because they have no inherent morality. So you can literally, you can say bestiality is accepted and encouraged. Now, it's good for you because for climate change. And they'll sit there and go, oh, for climate change, well, off we go.

And they'll just do it. So I think you have a camp of people who think, and you have a camp of people who repeat. And I don't think there's actually the opposing side to the good, I don't think function as a thinking populace at all. I think they simply repeat. It feels like the conflict between those two groups is getting more intense.

It's certainly getting more intense. And it was interesting for me because and I want to be an optimist, but I lost so much faith in humanity during COVID If you would have told me how COVID would have gone down before COVID I'd say, no way, we're not that bad. I thought, the people aren't that dumb. But when I experienced COVID, it's actually scary. You see how the Nazis managed to do what they did.

You see how they managed to put people in concentration camps. You see it. And I had a very unique view of COVID because in the first days of COVID when people were falling over in China and the Italian hospitals were overrun at the height of the panic, when most people believed because it was the very beginning, early stages. My brother and I had a very logical conversation and said, we're two military aged men in very good physical condition. If we die of this the world's over, if it can kill us, it's zombie apocalypse, so why are we going to live in fear?

So we found the only two countries that were open, which were Sweden and Belarus. We had just been to Belarus, this is before the Ukraine war. We'd just been there. We decided to try Sweden. So for the first three months of COVID during the height of lockdowns, when Florida was closed, when it was absolutely I remember, yeah, when it was the craziest lockdowns, globally, me and Tristan are in Sweden in absolute freedom.

They had no restrictions, no masks, no vaccine passports, no social distancing, nightclubs are full lunch, restaurants are open, perfectly complete, normal society. Nobody talks about this anymore, nobody talks about weight. Sweden never did a thing. Everything functioned perfectly fine the entire time and they don't have it. Where's their mass?

Where's their illness of severe their winter of severe illness and death? They never had one. It's a cold country. Never had one. So we were living in Sweden, living completely normal lives, seeing everyone, seeing the internet and seeing this insanity.

And we're like, well, surely if we just put up a few videos of us partying in Sweden, in nightclubs, this will wake people up. People didn't want us. People ignored their own eyes. That's the scariest thing about everything, is that they can get to a level where with the media machine, where people will genuinely ignore their own eyes. I don't understand how you can get people so brainwashed that they will see that the sky is blue and then they'll watch that the sky is green and then they'll look at it again and go, sky's green.

It's crazy to me, but COVID proves they can do that and that's why the war is getting so intense, because the principled people are saying, how can you still believe in the things that you're saying? Here is all the logical, empirical evidence that that is a lie. But these people are ideologically brainwashed and they don't want to take enough. They don't have the bravery it takes to wake up and accept that they're being lied to. So they'd rather, just to the end of time, repeat what they're told.

And it becomes more and more intense as it becomes more and more ridiculous. This is scary. As it becomes more and more ridiculous, the more intense both sides get. Yes. Right.

So what the future holds, I'm not entirely sure, but I like to believe even my current charges, I found solace when I was in jail. That the thinking. People are looking at this going, Something about this doesn't seem right. Well, I mean, it is a little bracing. I mean, when I discovered I mean, I was sympathetic to you already, but a man's accused of human trafficking, it's worth finding out what he's accused of.

And when I discovered that there was no actual human trafficking charge, that's not actually human trafficking, I don't care what you call it, you weren't buying. Even accused of buying and selling anyone, then the next conclusion you inevitably reach is, they don't like the guy, they don't like his views. Fine. They're going to send him to jail for that. That does seem like an escalation.

Absolutely. But if they don't like your views and you're inspiring millions of people to resist slave programming, you become a threat like they discuss me. But you can't send a guy to jail because you disagree with him. You shouldn't. But even before I went to jail, the members of Parliament in the UK were talking about me and what a dangerous role model I am for young boys.

So they launched this initiative inside of British schools to ban me. My name can't be said inside of any British school. And members of Parliament were standing up in Parliament saying, Andrew Tate is dangerous. He's encouraging young boys to have misogynistic views, because I'm literally telling young men to go to the gym and to stand up for themselves and believe believe in themselves and believe in something. And by extension, you look at some of the sexual education books these children are being given, which I believe in age nine, I don't think a child needs to learn about anal sex or any of these things.

Probably not. Yeah, probably not. So they're pushing that to the children, but I'm banned. Well, they're also pushing weed and video games on boys. Oh, completely.

And you can listen to rap music about killing people all day long. And there's a whole and little nas. He can have sex with the devil in his music videos, that's fine. But I'm dangerous for saying, go to the gym. And once I realized what was scary to me is I said this to my brother, I said, Once the Parliament is discussing you, you're basically considered a national security threat at this point.

You're a threat to national security at that level. And then all bets are off. Right. So the UK has become more authoritarian than anywhere in the Persian Gulf. Correct.

How did that happen? Yeah, like I said, it's very interesting because people still the people on Camp B who don't think a lot of them believe that the law is fair. I've had people say to me, oh, yeah, what they're doing to you is garbage. You need a lawyer. Yeah, I do need a lawyer, and I do have a lawyer, thank you.

But it's not that simple, unfortunately, the law is very subjective and if they want to attack you with it, they're going to do a very good job of attacking you with it. And that's what the UK does. The UK have these laws which are extremely subjective, and they can use it as a weapon to basically silence anyone. They decide England is the birthplace of free speech, habeas corpus of kind of framework of liberal democracy that we thought we believed in, and now it's a country where people are arrested for praying. Well, what happened?

Good question. And there's a saying that I heard, and I don't know who said it, but he said that a sick country adopts laws like a dying man will try medicine. And I think that the UK is failing in real time. If you look at it in any metric, whether it's living standards, whether it's crime rate, any any metric, you can measure the success of a country by it's fallen off the cliff, it's becoming more and more expensive to live there. The education system's gone down the pan.

London is the stabbing capital of the world. You're not safe to leave your house. So their answer to this is just more and more and more laws. And unfortunately, as they do that, they're not even intelligent enough to actually attack the people who are doing genuinely bad to the world. They just make more and more authoritarian laws and they end up using them to attack the people that the government doesn't like.

And I ended up being one of them. And I think Europe in general has problems. If you look at France as we speak, I think it's on fire, isn't it? Most of it. It is, yeah.

So they have issues, and their answer, what's a government's solution to anything? Law? What can a government do, no matter what? But they're not laws that are aimed at fixing the problem. That's right.

No, they're laws aimed at fixing the person who's talking about the problems. Why don't you get rid of the guy who tells everybody? Isn't that easier? Tucker, why fix any of this? If we just shut him up, they won't know.

But that's like responding to a heat wave by breaking your thermometer completely. Right, that's the plan. Plan one is to break the thermometer. We might deal with the heat wave a bit later, but get air conditioning. No, we break the thermometer for now.

There's too many people talking about the heat wave, so let's just break that and then later on, maybe when we have time, we'll do something about the actual issue. It does seem like a lot of this is an effort not to talk about the thing, the real thing, in Europe, anyway, which is migration. And the U. K, formerly known as England and France have both been completely changed by people from other countries and I'm sure have added good things, too. I mean, I'm not but they've changed them and in general, they're not better countries, and why can't anyone admit that?

But this is what's really interesting to me about what's happening, because we're talking about masculinity and men who say no and men who stand up. But there has to be balance, right? Everywhere in the world, there has to be power balances. If there's not a balance in power, there's going to be a vacuum, and that's going to be filled. If you neuter the native population of men, if you destroy their mentality to resist, if you tell them that every single thing about the masculine is wrong and you basically feminize and unicate them, turn them into eunuchs and then you import high testosterone men from the Third World who don't believe any of this garbage, who grew up in a society where they understand the only way to succeed is to be a fearsome predator.

To a degree. What do you think is going to happen? Like, who's supposed to protect the sanctity of these nations and these settlements and these towns and villages? The police? No, in general, I would argue that it's the masculine essence that can be detected by the people who arrive.

I guarantee if you were to pick up, put a bunch of these migrants in Sarajevo or Moscow, they behave themselves. I have a feeling they'd just look around and go, not today, but when you knew, or the native populace, then it's like, well, there's a power vacuum. And when there's a power vacuum, what do we expect to happen? What are the French going to do about it? What's your average Englishman going to do about it?

Nothing. And that's the thing. And that makes you wonder, is this purposeful, these two actions of neutering the native populace and importing these high testosterone Third Worlders are so at ODS with each other. Is this purposeful? I'm not sure, but has anyone considered this?

So, yeah, it's interesting because you talk about these are huge and intentional trends. They're historically transformative trends. They're a big deal, so they're probably not happening by accident, right? There's got to be some intent. How could there not be that's right?

And how do they expect all of this to end? And this is exactly what's happening with migration. The problem with migration specifically is that there's no native masculine populace to enforce any degree of culture or boundary or parameter. And like I said, I would argue the point. And I've been to Sarajevo and I've been to Moscow, I've been to these places and I've seen there's a whole bunch of migration and everybody seems to just behave a little bit differently.

And I think that's because people understand did men live here. That men live here. If you turn up in someone's house and their house is pristine, you're probably going to take your cup and you're going to go put it in the kitchen. But if you turn up in somebody's house and it's a fucking mess and nobody respects the house and nobody cares, and the man is drugged out of his mind, half asleep on the couch, what are you going to do with your cup? You're going to leave it there?

You don't give a shit. If you turn up to the Western world looking, then you're going to hit on his wife. Absolutely. So what do we expect to happen in these scenarios? Right.

And it is purposeful and it is scary that even me just telling men to go to the gym is seen as an act of defiance to the point where I have to be punished. I must go to jail, I must be silenced. Thermometer must be broken at the end of all of this, no matter what happens. Do you plan to stay in Romania? I love Romania.

I love this country. And if I am found not guilty, I will stay in Romania. Yeah. I will still stay here. I don't believe in running away.

I also believe, and perhaps this is yeah, I didn't even want to ask you that because legal case pending. But I mean, presumably you're rich enough to run away when you have it. Correct. I'm not going anywhere. I think if I was anywhere in the Western world, this would have happened to me.

I don't think this is Romania's fault, let's put it that way. I don't think this is Romania's fault. I think if I resided in Switzerland or France or Italy, the same thing would have happened. From knowing what I know, I think it was going to happen to me regardless. And I think I do have a large amount of sympathy the especially amongst the Romanian population.

I get thousands of messages a day from Romanians apologizing to me. I think the people here actually like me. My waiter at lunch yesterday is one of them. He wanted you to know. Yeah.

Amazing. This is what I mean. Everyone understands what's happening. My problem is not with Romania. I don't hold any personal grudges against Romania.

I think that this Matrix attack was going to come to me. What is the Matrix? Good question. I guess some Americans call it the deep state, but I like to look at it in a more global way. When I say The Matrix, I think there are certain agendas which are being pushed.

I think the media machine and the judicial systems of the world work together hand in hand. I think the goal is to control people's minds to a point where they don't discuss anything that's important. The reason I use The Matrix is because I've watched that movie a few times, and it has so many similarities. To the have you seen the movie? No.

You've never seen the movie The Matrix? No, I don't watch any movies. I don't want to talk about it on camera. No, I'm very dyslexic, and it's hard for me to watch video. Got it honestly understood.

But there's so many similarities, and the basic premise is that humans minds are controlled and put inside of a false reality so that their body heat can be manifested for the machines. And I don't think it's much different to reality. Our minds are controlled. We're put in a false version of reality. We're told things aren't true.

We're arguing over things that don't matter. We're observing a false version of events. And the goal of it is just to distract us long enough for our bodies to be used for the machines, the soulless. And I think it's pretty similar. Pretty similar.

Striking similarities. And even then, there's a bunch of other similarities which are difficult for me to explain. You haven't watched a movie. But there are agents inside of The Matrix, and the idea of the agent, the purpose of the agent is to make sure that nobody understands how The Matrix really works and to wake anybody's mind up. They want to keep you asleep.

And any person can become an agent at any time. If they're not unplugged, if their mind is not free, they can become an agent. And their job is to keep you asleep. And you see agents all the time. COVID awoken me to agents when I would sit and talk to somebody, and they seemed perfectly rational and normal until I mentioned COVID, and then they'd fully change.

No, it's dangerous. No. What do you mean? What do you mean? Are you crazy?

My grandma got sick, and they became an agent instantly and started repeating the news to me. And I was like, Your grandma got sick? How old is she? 97. Interesting.

Oh, I'd better lock myself in my house then. Dumbass.

Agents exist and the matrix exists. And I think most people's version of the world is a false one. The idea and the world that most people have in their mind and how society functions and how all these things function I genuinely believe is completely false. I think they've all been lied to. I don't think anybody understands how any of the of the world works.

And I try and use some very simple, you know, very simple analogies to wake people up. I said to one of my friends once, I said, if me and you could play video games for $10,000 and you could cheat, would you cheat? He goes, no. I was like, If I was whooping your ass and it was ten grand a game and you could cheat, would you cheat? He goes, yeah.

I was like, all right. So you accept that people cheat to win in a video game for a menial amount of money. Do you think they're not going to cheat for something that matters. Yeah, I think they're not going to cheat for something important. You understand what I'm saying?

How about to get the most important job in the world, president of the United States? I would never kill myself. I mean, people kill each other over insurance fraud. You don't think, right? Yeah.

So when you actually understand how the world really works you know what was really interesting? I remember there was this big military coup. Was it Myanmar or Burma? One of these there was a big military coup like a year ago or something, and nobody really cared. They mentioned on the news a little bit, and I looked at it and I looked into it, and they were talking about how the two political parties were almost 50 50.

And then in the 90s, something changed. And now one political party just smokes the other one. And the military took over to restore democracy and all this stuff. It was very interesting to voting machines they used. Really interesting something to look into a lot of countries like that.

Philippines also true. Why do you think support for the war in Ukraine support for Ukraine side in the war against Russia support for a war against Russia in the west is kind of the bottom line issue for the people who run the US government and for the American media. Why? I guess you could argue about it, but there isn't an argument about it in the United States. There's a position, and anyone who doesn't hold it is attacked and punished.

Why? Why is that so important? Well, the first thing I think we should all do is I think we should all give Putin credit for curing COVID. Right? Because when his invasion happened, COVID went away.

So thought about that. Think about it. It's almost to the day. So we have to give him some credit at least for doing that. He may be the bad guy of the world, but at least he cured COVID for everybody nearly instantly.

Fair. Thank you for thank you, President Putin. Yeah, i, up until this point, never really commented too heavily on politics. Yes. But I understand very well.

I like to believe what's happening with Ukraine and Russia. And what I will say to the people who are watching this at home is that if you are naive enough to believe that there are good guys and bad guys in wars and it's as simple as good, and bad and that the bad guys are crazy and the good guys want freedom, then you need to do a little bit more investigation into what's really happening. And when you look at the vested interest of any country or any person, can I just ask you to pause and just comment? That's the truest thing, what you just said. And anyone who doesn't understand that should shut the fuck up.

And I mean it. Having seen war, anyone who's telling you that it's Churchill versus Hitler is an idiot. Completely. Well, I'll give an example. When my father was still alive excuse me?

Yeah. No, it's true. When my father was still alive, my father died six or seven years ago. I was a lot younger. The war in Afghanistan was going on.

He died six or seven years ago. How old was he? 56. Oh, gosh. Yeah, he died.

But the war in Afghanistan was going on. And I remember asking my dad saying, why do the Taliban even fight and resist the American war machine? They don't stand a chance. Like, why are these terrorists even fighting against the American war machine? And my dad said, they're fighting for their way of life.

They want their wife and they want their children, and they want their society and their language, and they don't want pride flags, and they don't want American bullshit, and they don't want to be told what to do. And they're fighting to be a culture and be a people which is independent in and of itself. Like, they're not the bad guys you think they are. They're people who are like, Why are you here? What do you want?

We don't agree with that. That's against our holy book. Fuck off. Right. So even there's no such thing as good and bad in any war.

Who is your father? My father was a chess master. He worked for the CIA when he was he was a linguist for the CIA. And then he was American. American.

He was discharged and for a story I won't tell. But he was a chess master, and he is very interesting. I encourage people to look at his Twitter. He still has Twitter at Tate. Terrific.

And everything he was talking about eleven years ago is so important now. Eleven years ago, no one cared about we had the Dawn Bass in 2014. People cared a bit, but he was literally he predicted the future. You want to see how chess players can see the future? Read his Twitter.

Everything from LGBTQ, why they need your kids because they can't have their own, to the war that's coming and how Europe's going to have an energy crisis, to the letter all on his Twitter. It's amazing to read it's like he told you could tell the future. Ten years ago, no one talked about any of this stuff. Did he live in the US? Yes.

He lived in America. Fascinating. Yeah, it's crazy. But he was telling me about a lot of this stuff even when I was a lot younger. And as we said, there's no good guys and bad guys.

But when you have a vested interest in something, I think that people are relatively simple. You're talking about why the American government has such a vested interest in this war, which is not good for America. Which is not good for America. So is it well, we can say it's for money or we can say it's for power? What else would it be for?

Is it really for freedom and democracy? Well, I think that's already been destroyed by Zelensky, hasn't it? So what is it for if it's not for money and power? And then you say, well, who is the money and the power going to? These are logical conversations.

It's a very logical thought process. I agree. Wouldn't it be interesting to say, okay, I woke up. I'm an american. I would never kill myself.

I woke up. I'm an american. Why does America care? Well, I guess it's for money or power. There's no other reason.

Okay, well, America wants to be a rich, powerful country. That's fine. Is the money and power going to America, or is it going to a select few individuals? Are those select individuals interested in me, in my life? Do they care about benefiting me?

Do I need to support the power grab of these select few individuals? Is that going to be a smart move for me to make, for me to have the best possible human experience? These are very logical thought process, yes. People don't seem to think anymore. They believe that there's a good guy and there's a bad guy, and one team's completely good, and one team's completely bad, one team's crazy.

They often use the word crazy because to be completely bad, you have to be crazy, right? So you're crazy. He's crazy. Just for no reason. Just reasonless.

Insanity. I don't know if you saw Lukashenko with the BBC. Did you ever see that interview? No. Oh, brother, please watch it.

The way he destroys the BBC. I thought I did the best job, but I take second place. Amazing. But yeah. And you just have to be critically thinking.

And then after you're critically thinking, you have to be brave enough. And this is the real pandemic of the world as cowardice. You have to be brave enough to look around you and realize everything was a trick, everything was a lie. But why not be a coward? It's just a lot easier, right?

Well, it used to be. This is the thing that's interesting. I would actually argue in the 1950s and 60s, if you were to agree with every single narrative and obey every single law and do exactly what you were supposed to do and pay your taxes, et cetera, you'd at least get a wife who respected you. You'd at least have children who go to school without being indoctrinated to a degree. You could have a nice house, you could have a pickup truck.

You could have a pretty good life if you just followed the rules. Yes. I don't think that's true anymore. I think that if you are a man especially and this is what I talk about I talk about masculine issues if you're a man who was born and you decide to do exactly as you're told, you're going to end up depressed, in debt, working a job that you hate with a wife who doesn't respect you, with kids who don't listen to you in a house you don't own until she leads you. And then you contemplate suicide a while.

And maybe you might find some purpose towards the end, enough to survive and pay your taxes. And then you're gone. I don't think a man who just follows the programming is going to find any happiness. But they don't care. Why would they?

They have no interest in masculine happiness, is another thing that's very interesting. They talk about men's mental health all the time, especially in the UK. I'm not sure about America, but in the UK, they had this big drive from men's mental health, saying that men commit more suicides, men a lot more, because it's hard to be a man. We commit more suicides, we're more depressed, we have all these mental health problems. I come along, I genuinely get thousands of emails a day saying I'm helping people men's mental health.

But, no, can't help it. The way Andrew wants. You can't tell him to go to the gym and stand up for themselves and have pride. What kind of man's going to have a solid mentality and not have mental health issues if he has no pride? That's part of being a man.

Part of being a man is proud of yourself. If you wake up and you're not proud of who you are and how you look and the things you say, how you ever going to have a solid mentality? So when I teach things that genuinely help men's mental health, that's outlawed. No, you're not allowed to do that. Instead, you have to take our version, which is to pretend to care about men's mental health, but not give a shit.

Give them a life they know they're not going to enjoy, pay taxes and die. And men are the backbone. Medicate them and medicate them. Medicate them long enough to keep working the same way as we medicate farm animals, bunch of injections. Just keep them alive long enough to get the milk, milk's gone, chop the head off.

Boom. They need to put you in prison. They're trying. Yeah, I can see why they're trying, and it's scary a lot of people. But then what do I do?

Do I just shut up? No. You don't think so? No, you can't shut up. I mean, because in the end, your self respect, your dignity, is the only thing that's right.

And this is what people don't understand. People say, Andrew, why are you fighting this war? And they don't understand that war is certain. You either fight war against injustice and you fight war against the things you know that are wrong and you feel good inside of yourself, or you accept the slave programming and fight a war with your own mind. You have to fight something.

I can shut up and believe what I'm told in the news, but then I won't why am I so unhappy all the time? Why am I depressed? Why does my life suck? Why does my woman ignore me? Why do my children not respect me?

Then you're fighting a war with your own mind. I'd rather have all of me on side and fight against what I know is genuinely evil. You can't escape the battle. The battle is here for all of us. So I've made my decision and that's why I can't be quiet because you just said I would lose my self respect and I'd lose my dignity and I don't think I can function that way as a man and I don't think any man should be able to function without self respect and me?

The reason men died on the Titanic was for self respect and dignity. They went into the icy cold water and died because they would feel honorless if they jumped on the boat and left the women to die. That's right. So when you have self respect and dignity you have a hard parameter and you'll do things that which are deemed crazy or insane because you believe in them and you stick up for yourself and that's why they don't want men to have self respect and dignity. Rather be a free man in your grave.

Absolutely. So I can't be quiet and I'm going to say what I believe is true and I genuinely believe I'm helping the world. I think that any young man who is a follower of mine, I will argue there's no influencer on the planet besides me who is genuinely benefiting their life. I know you're not big on the internet. I look at these other streamers and these other influencers.

They play video games all day, they smoke weed on stream, they talk garbage. It's a bunch of drama back and forth like girls. I'm the only influencer or streamer who's genuinely talking about making money because you need to have money to escape the matrix. It's very hard to resist enslavement when you have to pay the bills. Getting physically strong because a strong body is a strong mind, standing up for yourself, self motivation, all these things.

I'm talking about genuinely positive things. Very few people are. And I think that is an extremely important message that needs to be told and I'm not going to stop doing it because I know I'm genuinely helping the world and they're going to try and punish me for it for the rest of my life. I think this is just beginning and I think when I beat this case, which I believe I will beat, I think something else is going to come. And it's kind of scary because I am a little bit afraid and a little bit intimidated by the incompetence of my enemy because their standardized playbook is now failing in real time.

The standardized playbook is the media attack, the lie and it's not working anymore. And it got me a little bit worried about what the next move is. You used to just be able to lie about guy over the news and you win, right? But now it's like, Shut up. So now what?

I don't know. And that's what's kind of scary in my scenario, because nobody's going to believe any of the crap they print about me. Nobody believes it. Nobody believes it. Whenever I do an interview with the Matrix media, nobody believes they have to turn the comments off because everyone the comments are just ripping them apart.

You do seem very sad. On the verge of killing yourself, are you? Absolutely not. Really not. I never would.

And that's what you said, that I have to keep saying it. I have to keep saying it because it's scary. Right. But I believe you get three lives. I think they cancel you initially, and then when that fails, they try and put you in jail without a reason.

And if that fails, there's only one option left after that. That's right. So I'm in a very scary scenario, but I guess the same as the men on the Titanic just couldn't get on the lifeboat. I just can't stop saying what I believe to be true. If a young man comes to me and says he's depressed, I'm going to tell him how to become a kind of man who's proud of himself.

And if that makes him the kind of person that resists slave and slave programming, I'm always going to be public enemy number one. You've said depression isn't real, or it's not as the way we describe depression isn't accurate. What do you think of depression? When I say depression isn't real, that really upset the world, especially the liberals, because they all live on medication, right? When I say depression isn't real, I'm saying that because I don't believe in things that can take away power from me.

If I believed in depression, I would have been depressed in jail. But I can't be depressed if I don't believe in it. If you don't believe in ghosts, how could you be haunted? You have two people in a haunted house. One believes in ghosts, one doesn't.

There's a knock in the night, one wakes up, calls an exorcist, is terrified, looks for a ghost. The other guy doesn't believe in ghosts, knock in the night, goes back to sleep. It's the belief in the ghost that gives it the power. If I don't believe in depression, I believe in feeling depressed. Sure, we're humans, we have emotions.

Sometimes we feel depressed, sometimes we feel happy. I don't believe in the idea of becoming a depressed person who has depression. I don't believe in that. I don't think that's possible for me. So if I don't believe in it, how can it happen?

I don't believe in depression, so why would I not adopt the mindset that makes me the most capable predator I can possibly be? Why not adopt a mindset that makes me as competent and as fearsome as possible if you've to install software in your own mind, why would I not install software that makes me capable of not only driving a bugatti and flying on private jets, but sitting in a Romanian dungeon covered in cockroaches? I need to be able to do all of it. So why would I believe in something that made me incapable? I don't believe in depression because I think that even the belief in and of itself, when you feel depressed, you'll start to consider, maybe I have depression.

Then you go see a psychiatrist who tells you have depression. Then they want you on pills. It's the belief that goes down the spiral. If I feel sad, I go, I'm depressed today, I'll be fine tomorrow. So why I suspect you're right?

Or what you're saying is pointing toward truth. That's my personal view. But even if I disagree with you, okay, I disagree with you. Why is that so offensive, what you just said? Well, that's what's interesting.

Because when I said depression wasn't real, the number of people who would attack me defending depression, this is why I didn't understand. You say depression isn't real, but depression has ruined my life and it's super real and it's ruined my life and I lost my marriage. I'm like, if I told you it wasn't real, you should be coming to me saying, tell me how it's not real. Please help me with my depression. Why are you trying to convince me that it's real?

Why are you sticking up for it? Why are you defending depression? And why would I adopt the thinking of someone who's sad? You're going to convince me to take your worldview? You just told me your wife left you, you're fat and you want to kill yourself.

And you want me to sit here and go with my perfect life and go, you know what? I want to think like this guy. You're at your mind. I don't believe in it. And because I don't believe in it, it's made me the kind of person who can't become depressed.

And the reason they don't like me attacking that is because depression is a fantastic way to subdue a population, right? If everybody's depressed, it's hard to have a revolution. You're depressed, oh, they've locked us all in our houses. I don't want to go outside anyway, I'm sad, right? So depression is a fantastic tool of population control.

They have no problem with you being depressed. They have a problem with you being the opposite, principled and energetic. No, you don't want principled, energetic people, that's a problem. A bunch of depressed people, easy. If you were to invade a country, would you rather the opposing army be principled and energetic or depressed?

I'll tell you, I would not want to be invaded by a cheerful army. Absolutely scary. They're having too much fun, right? You want them all to be depressed. So a morose army is easier to defeat.

I agree. Absolutely. So depression is a defended idea. You're not allowed to even talk about it. You're not allowed to help people get out of it.

Right. They like the idea of a depressed population. And this is what I say to people now. I'm not stupid. I understand, like, PTSD is real.

I understand mental health is real. I'm not saying that. But I say if you're an 18 year old boy or 18 year old man and your life is pretty much okay, bacteria didn't steal your eyesight, which could have happened. You never had a car crash and lost both of your legs, which could have happened, you're actually very fortunate, and you wake up and you say, I'm depressed. I think you're an idiot.

I don't think you're depressed. I think you've been psyoped. I think you feel a little bit of depression, and you can fix that by changing your life. I think if you became rich and strong and smart and successful and you worked hard and you dedicated yourself and you were motivated and you tried your very, very best to become excellent, you probably wouldn't feel depressed anymore, which means it's not a disease, is it? The only reason you're even saying you have depression is because you believe in it.

So you're arguing for cause and effect. You're saying if you live a certain way, you're going to feel a certain way. Absolutely. And I also would argue that I think we've evolutionarily, even though I do believe in God, I think that we've designed ourselves, and the human has grown into a way where if you feel depressed or sad, I think that's a fantastic trigger or a warning signal to do something. If you were to say to me, andrew, you have to complete this monumental task, you have to conquer the world, I would say, okay, but I need an emotional motivation to do that.

I need to be unhappy having not completed the task. I need to be uncomfortable, right? If you're uncomfortable being out of shape, you'll get in shape. If you're happy being out of shape, then you're just going to stay out of shape, right. So if you feel a degree of uncomfortableness inside of your mind, I think it's just your mind telling you that something about your life needs to change.

Yes. You need to get up and change something. Guys would say to me, I'm depressed because I'm fat and I have no girlfriend. And I'd say, no, you have no girlfriend and you're fat and that's why you're depressed. If you go change those two things, you'd probably be surprised that your disease goes away.

I had another guy said he was going to kill himself. I said, Listen, back when I used to reply to my emails when I was smaller, I said, make me a promise. Get a six pack first of beer. I said, Get a six pack first. Get in fantastic shape.

And then do whatever you want. Didn't want to kill himself once he's in. Fantastic. So he did it? Yeah.

After. Before and after I put him on Twitter. Kind of interesting that, isn't it? So how are we going to say we have this disease, which is cause and effect? How are we going to say we have this disease where there's something wrong with you as a man, you have a disease because your life sucks.

I mean, I don't think that's true. I think that your life just sucks and you should change it. And another thing I also preach, and this is another thing that's very important. I also think as a man, because life as a man is pain and suffering. And when I say that, because you're never going to be a good man or good at being a man without pain and suffering, you're going to have to go through a bunch of shit and have a terrible life to become a good man, I think you should embrace that and accept it.

And I think that the correct mental model for men to have is a degree of stoicism and not to be too concerned with even how they feel. If I woke up today happy, if I woke up today and happy, I would have done this interview with you. If I woke up today sad, I would have done this interview with you. What's the difference? Why put so much importance on my emotion if certain things must be done?

I must work. I must train. I must see Tucker Carlson, I must resist the matrix. I've got things to do. So why are we going to sit around and talk about how I feel if it doesn't even affect how I act?

And as a man, it shouldn't. Because there's too much to do. And the masculine world is hyper competitive. This is another thing most people don't understand. It's hyper competitive out here.

All the women want a few men at the top. The Ferrari. You. You don't want a Ferrari to drive fast. You want a Ferrari because other men want a Ferrari and can't have one.

It's hyper competitive. So if you're competing against every other man for every dollar you make, every girl you see, the house you live in, the car you drive, the life you live, you're not going to be able to compete with the person who performs regardless of how they feel. If you only compete when you feel like competing. Right. Because there's men like me out there who will be sad every day and outcompete you regardless.

I don't care how I feel. I will still win. And that's the kind of mindset you need to adopt. So I don't win. A man come on a job to do.

Stop whining, go to work. Completely. I agree completely. So when men say I feel sad, who cares? The world doesn't care.

All the men who are out here to. Destroy you and take your girl. Don't care. So why do you care? The person who should care least is you.

You're the only person who wakes up every day who should have a genuine vested interest in improving your life. Nobody else wakes up and wants to improve your life, only you. So if nobody else cares about how you feel, why do you care? So my argument also for depression is you're depressed. Fine.

Have you trained today? That doesn't change what you should do with your life, depressed or not. And I don't say this because I'm an eternally happy person, I say this because I've experienced all ranges of human emotion. I was in a Romanian jail cell with cockroaches crawling all over me as I slept. I never missed a day of training.

I wouldn't say I was particularly happy, but push ups must be done, so they got done. You're very close to your brother correct. And you were locked away for part of that with him. Did you have fun at all with him? Yes, I do think there's something inside of men, whereas if you're with your boys or you're with your group of men yes, there's something inside of us.

Totally. And it allows you to make the absolute best of the worst situations. Maybe that's an evolution from war. All the men went to war and you saw all this pain and suffering and you saw heads, people decapitated and you're injured, but then you sit around the campfire and you're laughing, you're laughing. That's right.

It's something inside of us. It's like a coping mechanism when you're around men. So when me and him were together, no matter how bad the scenario or no matter what they tried to do to us, part of us would just look at each other like, cigarette. And you find joy in that. And, yeah, there's definitely and that's another thing I think a lot of men are lacking, a lot of men are missing is a masculine support network.

Buddies. Buddies. You talk to a guy and say, what was the highlight of your life? What was the best time of your life? And they'll say, Ah, college football.

It's not about the football, it's about the team. Yeah. And I think a lot of that's destroyed as well, because also, it's interesting how everything interconnects when you destroy honor and principle and the masculine essence inside of men. Well, now, as a man, it's very hard to have friends. I wouldn't want to have a male friend who had no principles, no honors, and didn't work hard and was always crying about being sad.

What do I want to hang around with him for? He's a loser. Right, so then your support network is destroyed. And I think that men have always needed that since the dawn of time, and I think that's gone. But they don't have friends.

Men, especially middle aged men, have no friends. Absolutely. Because they've been told that to give them all away and do as the wife says. And then she left him. No wonder he wants to kill himself, wouldn't you?

No wonder he's depressed. It sounds like the worst existence ever. And now we're living in a world now especially where everything is hyper competitive, especially the sexual marketplace. Like, if you're a 52 year old, overweight average income, no fame, dude, and you have to find a girl, it's going to be pretty difficult to find a good one. It's going to be very hard.

So of course he's lonely, and then his kids don't respect him. They're busy. Of course he's sad. It's actually heartbreaking to discuss. It is heartbreaking.

It's heartbreaking. But then how do you prevent that happening? Well, then you need to be a man of honor and principle and make sure that you keep your support networks and make sure that your woman does respect you. And a woman's going to respect you when she sees other men respect you. Yes.

And they're only going to respect you if you respect yourself. But to respect yourself, you have to be the kind of person who says no. What do you think of porn? There's been some statistics. There's been some studies done.

Most men or less men are having sex than ever before. I've seen that. Yeah. And that's that well, that's an extension of the fact that masculine virtue is being destroyed. That's the thing that's interesting about all these things.

They psyop, especially men. They say, listen, women want a feminist man. Women want a man with no moral principle who would make sure that there's a conversation about who should fight the burglar when your house is broken into. Because equal opportunities, equal rights, of course, don't presume just because you're a man that you should defend her physically. Of course not.

That makes you a bigot and a misogynist. So they convince men to adopt these virtues in ways, and of course, women by and large dislike them for it. So now, as men's, as masculinity has plummeted, a whole bunch of men are simply not having sex anymore. And then they become addicted to porn, which is cucking effectively. Two people are having sex and you're just watching it.

Good point. And it's become a pandemic. Right. So men are replacing genuine sexual relationships with just the computer screen and porn, and it's becoming a very, very big problem. And that's also exasperated by the fact that I think the sexual marketplace has become globalized.

This is the thing I say to young men. A lot of men come to me with problems, and my only answer to them is masculine excellence. I say that in the world we live in today, being a normal man or below normal is going to be terrible. You have to be an exceptional man, because the sexual marketplace, especially even if you just want to find a wife, is globalized. In 1955, if you met the hot girl in the Nebraskan town.

She was the hot girl in the Nebraskan town. If you meet her today, she's being offered to go to Corsioval and go skiing in France, and she's being offered to fly to Dubai. And there's millionaires who can just fly her anywhere and give her anything she wants. And who are you? It's getting harder and harder as a man to even find the most basic human function of reproduction.

Even to just find a woman you can reproduce with, it's becoming more and more difficult. You also couple that with the fact that they've destroyed morality in women also. So when you destroy the morality in men and you destroy how a man should act, and then you destroy how a woman should act, you're both going in the opposite direction. Most women out there are very happy to share a man who's just rich and famous and they don't care. So if you're the normal guy, there's this rich, famous guy with 30 girls, that's 29 dudes who are lonely and end up watching porn.

And if you have a porn addiction or you have a problem with porn, you have a problem with yourself. Because I guarantee if you were the kind of man you're supposed to be, you would have no time for that and you wouldn't need it. I can confirm that's absolutely not really the case. Yeah. So the fact you even need porn shows, there's a problem with you as a man, because if you were the kind of man you could be, and I genuinely believe that any man can become anything, then you'd have unlimited sexual options and you would have no interest in that.

And I do want to make this clear to the world because there's a bit of a misconception about my story. My father was in the military, and then he left to become a professional chess player. He was a traveling chess player layer. You don't make money with that. My mother and father broke up at age nine.

We moved to England purely because you get more help from the state. I was raised on welfare in Marsh Farm, which is the worst area of the worst town, Luton, with the highest crime rate. I went to a school with a 4% pass rate. Single mother household, effectively started from absolutely nothing, became a kickboxing world champion. Your mother was English.

English, correct. So I started at the absolute lowest echelon of life, and I would like to consider myself pretty somewhere near the top. Now, I've been through absolutely every stage. So when I say to men, you can become anything you want, and my answer to you is masculine excellence, there's no other answer. I can't tell you how to rig the game and cheat the game.

If we're all racing a race and I have a Ferrari and you have a Nissan, I mean, sure, you can get a bit better at driving, but you're probably going to lose. You have to get a better character to play this game of life. So that's why I preach masculine excellence. Because for many of the world's problems today, porn, sexual access, being respected by your peers, making sure that your wife's going to stay with you after the children are born, for a very long time, being happy, anything, it all comes down to who you are as a man. A lot of the answer, the only answer, is masculine excellence.

There's nothing you can do besides hard work. Accept the trauma and pain and suffering and work harder than everyone else around you worked. And that's why porn is a problem. So I will genuinely say to any man out there who finds himself loading up that website, go take a look in the mirror and realize why no one wants to fuck you.

And I said this to guys before. If you were a girl with all the choices she has, would you choose you? Think about it. And if you're honest with yourself, a lot of these guys, if they look in the mirror and go, you know what? No, I wouldn't choose me.

Work out why and do something about it. Absolutely not. Our self accountability, this is something that's also missing. I take accountability for everything in my life. Even going to jail, although it was unfair, although it's a Matrix attack, although it's garbage.

It was my fault. I sat there and go, what did I do wrong? How can I learn from this? Where is my part to play in this? What did I do?

Because my actions are what I have the most control over. I have self accountability for everything. If a woman doesn't want to sleep with me, I don't sit and say, women are this way. Society is that way. I just sit and say, okay, why?

What can I change? So any man who's loading up porn needs to go have a long conversation in the mirror and realize that he's not desirable or as desirable as he should be or could be. I come from absolutely nothing. I'mixed race. My father was black and my mother's white.

So statistically, mixed race, single household, single mother household, bad area. I ticked every box to end up in jail. I ended up in jail for the wrong reason. You fulfilled your destiny. Can't escape statistics.

I ticked every box to be a delinquent, and I refused to be one. I absolutely not refused to be a delinquent. I said, no, that's not who I want to be. I want to be a superhero. And I know the only way to be a superhero is to, one, suffer like Batman did.

His parents died, and two, work hard. What does your mother think? My mother is exceptionally proud of me. She still worries because mothers worry. But even when we were in jail, she said, well, I know you're both strong, so she knows she has men.

She knows she has. That's pretty great. Yeah, of course, I believe especially also I think a man has a duty to his last name. I think we carry the last name. We have a duty to our last name.

I am a tate. I am my father's son. The reason my father so is discussed so heavily is because of my monumental success. I keep him alive via my success. I would love to think my son does the same thing.

They will talk about my son in a way where they're so interested in his life path that I must be discussed by extension. And then I live forever. So I have a duty to tate, I have a duty to my last name. I must perform. And this is what I said to my mother on the phone.

I'm a Tate, it's fine, but the conditions are bad. Yeah, that's life. And even as a man today you're waking up, you want to load up a porn website, you should have respect for your last name and you should sit and say, is this who I am? Is this what I do? A lot of this comes down to the things we discussed at the very beginning self respect, honor, dignity.

Well, you have no dignity. I have too much dignity for that shit. And a lot of these men have no dignity, no self respect. And it's all an extension extends of why they're never going to be who they could be and also what they do to cope with that. And, yeah, porn is a coping mechanism.

What do you think of women? I think women are some of the most powerful people on the planet. Firstly, a lot of the conversations we're having, most people don't understand that women are the gatekeepers and women are the ultimate judges. Women are the ultimate judges, especially of sexual access, right? So when I say that maybe 40% of the letters I got in jail were from women just love letters, perfume on them and kiss kiss marks, and the traditional masculine role is still respected and loved by so many women.

If you were to ask the average woman on the street who hasn't lost her mind what she wants in a man, she would like to be financially provided for, physically protected. I love women. I think they are the most powerful and precious things on the planet. They give life. But I believe that when you love a woman, you should want to protect her and provide for her and take care of her.

I don't believe you love a woman by wanting to do everything she says and cucking to her. I don't believe that because I love women, I should have no standards on what I expect in a woman. I don't think loving women is sitting there going, a woman can do whatever she wants to me and I put up with it. I don't think that's loving women at all. I think loving women is saying, I'm going to be the best man I can be and the only way I'm going to be a good man is with a degree of standard and I'm going to be the best man I can be for you.

And when I say these things, I get attacked for being a misogynist, because how is that? I think misogynist means someone who hates women. Correct. Because I have conversations with women who are let's say I've done some podcasts with women who are very promiscuous and I've explained to them that since the dawn of human time, in every single society across the planet, promiscuity in females has been frowned upon. Yes, that's true.

It hasn't been frowned upon in men, but it has been in women. I explained in a big way, in a big way, in many parts of the world to this day, you can't get married if you're not a virgin. I'm not saying all women should be virgins. I was explaining to her that female promiscuity has always been hated. In every holy book it's disliked.

You've bought into this new think the last ten years and you seem to think it's empowering. And I would argue that it's not empowering. And I sat there and had a conversation with this promiscuous woman and I said to her that she is doing herself a disservice and she's dishonouring herself and she's never going to be happy or fulfilled jumping from bed to bed. And I was told that this makes me misogynistic, because women are empowered and they can make whatever choices they want. And I'm insecure to believe that a woman who slept with 300 men is somehow changed mentally and her ability to bond and love a man has been affected by that.

But it is that's true. Well, unfortunately, you're going to end up in a Romanian jail cell for being a misogyny. No, I mean, I love women and I've seen it and that is true, what you said. The thing that's interesting is that women intrinsically understand this, because if you see a woman dislike another woman, what's the first name she calls her slut. It's the first thing a girl says to a girl she doesn't like it's.

The biggest insult that comes to her mind is that she's promiscuous. Right? So it's interesting, but I've been a call to misogynist for that. And then I've been on the internet for a long time. I've made some jokes, I've made some videos, and people don't understand satire or comedy.

There's one that they keep repeating. I made a joke next to my bed. I had a glock, like many people do, and then I had a knife next to my bed and there was a comedic skit where it said, the girl caught me cheating and she picked up the knife and I slapped out of her hand and say, you still love me. And they cut the bit out where I talked about the girl attacking me with the knife. They just took the bit where I say, slap the knife out of her hand.

You're the boss. DA DA. And they he's a misogynist. He's a misogyny. And it's just taken out of context.

And that's another thing that's happened to me. And I am aware of this. And like I said, I take absolute self accountability. But the way you make jokes and make videos when you get hundred views is very different than the way you would make a joke or make a video when you get millions of views. And when they're trying their best to find that, look at a four hour video and find 3 seconds.

I'll give an example of it where it hurt me. Very recently, I did a podcast where I was discussing corruption. I discussed which country I believe is the most corrupt country in the world. They start a lot of wars. And the answer to that by the person I was discussing it with is, well, you live in Romania.

Romania is corrupt. I said, Romania is corrupt. Correct. But I don't think there's certainly corruption, but they don't start monumental wars which end up in millions of deaths. I would argue that their corruption, because a police man stops me and I can bribe my way out of a parking ticket or a speeding ticket is far less destructive.

So we discussed this at length for hours. They cut out the bit where I said Romania is corrupt and showed it to the judge that kept me in jail. Yeah, that's my problem in a nutshell. Long format content, people will find a little bit, edit it up and try and attack me with it. And that's where this whole misogynistic thing has come from.

It's either from me arguing with promiscuous women on podcasts designed for promiscuous women to argue their point and I destroy them so flawlessly I'm a bad person, or something taken out of context. And it's insane because like I said, the amount of support I get from women is actually monumental. The amount of mothers who write to me and say that their son's doing better than ever, the amount of women who write to me and say that their boyfriend's doing better than ever, the amount of women who love me and just want to meet me. This idea that I'm hated by women is probably the biggest lie about this whole story. I don't want to brag, but I can assure the world that's absolutely not true.

I had thousands of letters of support from women. In fact, there was one girl, never met her. She would play love songs from her car outside the jail. So she'd put the music on and play love songs. And I managed to tweet out, via my cousin, the songs I wanted to listen to.

White snake. Is this love? And she'd play them for me. Never met her. Don't know who she is.

So you're in a Romanian prison cell requesting White Snake on the radio in the car outside. Correct. And some girl would pull up and put kind of a surreal moment, put her speakers on full and play me my love songs for a good, like, three or four minutes for the police would come and make her move. But I got a song a day. But, yeah, this idea that I'm universally hated by women is insanity.

That's not true. So you said you're a mixed race. Your dad was black, your mom was not, was white. English, what do you make of the race conversation in the United States? I think it's deliberately they're trying to put fuel on the fire and they're deliberately trying to accelerate division.

This is what I believe. I think that if a black billionaire and a white billionaire meet somewhere, I don't think there's much conversation about race. No. I don't think there's any racism. Interesting.

They're not that interested in the topic, actually. They don't care. Right. But amongst the lower echelons of the populace, they seem very interested in trying to turn us all on each other. Yes, I wonder why that is.

And I wonder why they deliberately make laws and push media matters which are designed to do exactly that. I wonder why that is. We can sit and I have my own theories, but I think what certain people in the world would be most afraid of is the white people of a certain economic class and the black people of a certain economic class shaking hands and saying, this is bullshit. I think that would be very intimidating for them. So it's certainly accelerated.

And it's also very interesting because as a mixed race person, I will also sit and state I don't look particularly black. Most people can't guess where I'm from. I've had more discrimination against me for being a straight male than I've ever had for my skin color. I've had more people look at me or have problems with me purely because of my sexual orientation and my generally masculine essence than I've ever had anybody say anything about my skin color ever. And I'll also say, if somebody has a real problem with my skin color, who cares?

If someone's that ignorant, who gives a shit? I do find it amazing they managed to psyop people into being so brutally offended by it. If someone would come up to me and say, you're not white, I say, Correct. Have a nice day. Who cares?

It's amazing how they've got everyone wrapped up in this. But, yeah, it's certainly accelerated. And another thing that's very interesting about it, especially in America, a lot of Americans are insulated to, I feel like, world history. Yeah, I've noticed. You know, they're like, oh, slavery, slavery, slavery.

Slavery was everywhere. Every country had slaves. Arabs had slaves, chinese had slaves, aztecs had slaves. Everybody had slaves. The American Indians had slaves.

Everybody did. Correct. And they're like, oh, we've been enslaved. Everyone was enslaved. Unfortunately, the world wasn't such a nice place, right?

And there's been ethnic divisions in every single country on Earth since the dawn of time. There still is in many countries in the world today. They believe this is a uniquely American issue. And I would strongly argue that, one, is completely, utterly naught, and two, I think that if you are black, white, Asian, I think if you stand up, self respect, work hard, try your best, turn up on time, firm handshake, don't make excuses for anything, don't look for an easy way out. No matter what your skin color is in America or England or any other Western nation, I think you can be extremely successful.

I don't think anything's stopping you. That's not the message you get from, say, Kamala Harris, who's also mixed race. Her dad was Jamaican, her mom was Indian, but race is really at the center of her identity and her politics. What do you make of, say, Kamala Harris? Well, let's let's look at why they purport the idea that depression is so powerful and that you can just catch it from the sky, and now you're permanently depressed no matter what happens to you, and there's nothing you can do about it, and you can't improve your life and you can't be a better person.

Right. It's that self limiting belief. I think by also pushing this racism argument, it's also very much the same thing. I think if you adopt that mindset, if you wake up and you're a particular color, you're purple and you believe purple people can't make it, what's your chance of making it? Zero.

Yeah, right. So that's what's so destructive about it. This is why I'll even argue when I argue this point with people and they try and say, oh, but this happens. And they pull out these statistics and all this garbage from The Matrix. I say, Listen, even if the world's racist against purple people, the best thing you can do is be such an exceptional purple person that they need you.

They need you. The only answer is hard work. The only answer is self accountability, masculine essence, honor, dignity, making your ancestors proud of you because you hold the same last name as them. The answer is the same regardless, anyway. But when people at Kamala or Kamala are pushing this racism agenda, they're trying to say to people, effectively, you'll never be anything, and you don't stand a chance of ever being anything.

And I think that that makes people who aren't anything feel a little bit better about themselves. It's Cope and that's the only fans she has left are losers who she's told it's okay to be a loser because there's no way you could have not been a loser. And I will argue you could have been something a lot more than that, and you shouldn't listen to anybody who tells you not to be a loser. If someone were to come to me and say, andrew, you're a mixed race. You're from a single mother household.

You're never going to be rich, I'll say, Watch me. I don't believe you. I don't believe you. Who are you? So everything she's saying is, one, wrong.

Two, it's destructive to believe in three. I think it's her last hope at having any kind of fan at all, because she's largely incompetent. I don't think I've ever heard her put a compenduous, coherent sentence together.

And perhaps also, maybe that's the reason why she leans so heavily on race, because she's not impressive or competent. So she can say, oh, but I'm this color and I did it, instead of actually talking about how good of a job she's doing. Because if you have to discuss that part of her career or that part of her current life path, I think she'd be in a lot of trouble. I want to show you video of Joe Biden's challenger for the Democratic primary. Robert F.

Kennedy, Jr.

Runner. Runner. Runner. Run it.

So let's go, let's go, let's go.

Up.

What do you think of him? I think a strong body is a strong mind. I don't think there's anything wrong with the man exercising all until up until the age he dies. Why wouldn't he? I think that the bottom line of masculinity since the dawn of human time has been a propensity and a capability for violence.

I think that's what makes a man a man. I don't see any possible negative connotation with being in good physical shape. I think that's a fantastic way to show discipline, which is very important in any man who's important, especially a world leader. In fact, I love the idea of an elected world leader being in fantastic physical shape. I think it shows that they're a motivated, disciplined person, and I have a lot of respect for them for that.

And I think that in the military, we make it mandatory, right, to be in fantastic physical condition? Yes. So why wouldn't we have it mandatory for people who are in charge of the entire world? I think it's fantastic. The President of the United States seems to be failing physically.

As you look back at the country whose passport you hold at the President, what's your reaction? Well, sometimes, and it's not very often, I consider myself ignorant, but I feel like there must be some magic I missed, because wasn't he the most voted for president in history? Oh, yeah. Billions of votes. Yeah.

There must be some magic I just can't detect. Tucker, I don't want to more than Barack Obama. 81 million votes. It's insane. And I mean Barack.

Yeah, sure. He was very intelligent, articulate. He was concise and compenduous with his ideas. He could make you understand how he thinks. Yes.

But Joe must be better in some way. I can't seem to see how and I guess the fault. Is with me. I don't know what to say about that one. It's one of those lies that's so ridiculous that you're just like, okay, he got more votes than Barack Obama.

Shut up. He did. Shut up.

Excuse me, I want to get your take. This is sort of small ball, but I think tells you something about a largest trend in the United States. This is a state senator from the state of Wisconsin in a public hearing recently saying in a discussion on a crime bill, fuck the suburbs. Here she is. Fuck the suburbs because they don't know a goddamn thing about how life is in the city.

What is that? There's a hostility there. Where does that come from? That comes from being a perpetual victim. That comes from being told that everything that's happening to her is not her fault and she has no self accountability.

Even though she's managed to become a senator, somehow, she's still oppressed. And that means that everyone else who looks like her is also completely and utterly oppressed. And anybody who has a slightly better life in any way is, by extension, a bad person because they weren't oppressed. Yes, and that's where the hate comes from. The division is put there by these mindsets which are being purported by the people in charge of the world, convincing you that you have no control at all over your own life.

And that's why she's so resentful towards people who have done well in life, not even as well as her. I would also argue, perhaps I'm incorrect, that she probably lives in a suburb. Of course she does. So she's a hypocrite on top of that. But hypocrites are the fantastic thing about being a hypocrite is if you're a hypocrite with a little bit of power or influence, you're allowed to be a hypocrite because you're spreading information on the larger problem.

In fact, this is actually interesting. One of my funnest things. I'm going to announce this here on your show for everyone to know. This is a world exclusive. I want to become a climate change activist because when I was younger, people would say, what do you want to be when you grow up?

Do you want to be a fireman? You want to be Batman? Et cetera. And I wasn't sure what would really make me happy, but now I'm ultra wealthy, and I fly around on private jets all the time. I think that now is the time for me to become one of those hypocritical climate change actors.

100%. It's going to be super fun. Well, as your carbon footprint grows, your concern about carbon footprints grows. Absolutely. Eat the bugs.

Sell your car. How dare you eat meat on my jet? Of course I have meat, but I'm allowed to be a hypocrite because I'm spreading awareness for the overall pump for the greater good. For the greater good. I have to get to the climate change activist meetings, which happened to be in Switzerland.

I noticed, of course, although I'm flying on well, before this arrest, they're never in New Jersey. Never. So before this arrest, I was on about three or four jets a week, but every single time I was flying on my private plane, I was extremely concerned about the carbon footprint. Of course you were. And so I am now a climate change activist.

I just want to let the whole world know, because once you get to a certain level of power, of influence, you're absolutely not allowed to be a complete hypocrite. So you're allowed to live in the suburb and then tell everyone, fuck the suburbs and pretend that you're oppressed when you're a centerer of the most powerful nation on the planet because it's a logic fail on every level. So one of the human activities has got to produce the greatest carbon footprint is I would think war, right? I would think diesel powered machines, munitions going off. So I was a little bit surprised to see Greta Thunberg with Zelensky this morning.

What's interesting to me is this. Firstly, I would never kill myself. Secondly, imagine these people are so detached from reality. Imagine going, you know what we need to do, brainwave? We need to drum up support for this garbage.

Let's take the the most loved woman, Greta, and the most loved man, Zelensky. Let's make them meet. Think about the PR. Let's bring a camera and imagine people sitting around a table going, that's great. That's going to really make people support this.

Who gives a fuck? I don't want to swear, I'm sorry, but some young girl turns up to a war zone who has nothing. Why is she there? What are they going to talk about? I don't know, but what's their conversation?

I think she only yells. I don't think she does talk. I don't understand. Is she going to talk about how the childhood has been stolen from all those million Ukrainian men who have been blown to pieces? Like, she talks about childhood being stolen because we drive cars.

I don't think she is. I don't think she's going to mention that. Is it just a big PR opportunity? Like, what PR team came up with this concoction and thought, this will keep them on side? It's mind bending to me.

Who even thought this was a good idea? It's crazy. But of course somebody did. Somebody thought it was a fantastic idea. Have you ever met Greta thinberg.

No, but me and her have had some internet arguments. I think you went to prison for it, right? Yeah, correct. Which is amazing because I'm a climate change activist, so I'm on her team. I was in Sweden during COVID so we could have met.

She didn't want to hang out with me, unfortunately. And then now I'm flying around on my jet everywhere, spreading news about climate change. Same thing like in my Bugatti, obviously. It's got a big engine I make sure to talk about climate change out the windows as I drive. But I'm on her side.

She doesn't seem to be. Yell at the serfs as you pass about climate change. Yeah, don't eat meat, eat the bugs. What's wrong with you people? You don't care about the earth.

If you don't start caring about climate change all those politicians with beachfront property are going to lose their houses. Yes. And they're very concerned about climate change which is why they bought their houses on the beachfront. So they can be the first to let you know it's coming. The early warning system.

Right. They're very concerned. That's why they want to be right there on the beach. Quite honorable if you think about it. Kind of on the front lines.

The climate cris absolutely lead from the front. So good.

But one more point about this story. Sorry to go on and on. Oh I love it. But when I say these things, people, you don't care about the environment. And I try and explain to them I love nature.

You love hunting, fishing. You love nature. I love nature passionately. The problem with all of these things is not that I don't like nature. The problem is that nearly any issue which appears to be virtuous on the planet today is Trojan horsed with garbage.

That's the problem. I have no problem with fixing or maintaining or preserving nature. I have a problem with them telling me I have to maintain nature. Them Trojan horsing my bankruptcy into the middle of it, knowing that nature won't be fixed, then telling me it's about nature and telling me I should agree with it. That's my problem.

There's nothing left on the planet, no issue which isn't Trojan horsed with absolute garbage. And if you're going to sit there and tell me that I need to give more money to the government to stop the sun from being hot, I'm going to argue with you that I'd rather keep my money, thank you very much. Yes. So this is a problem with all these issues. It's nearly anything when I argue against some people.

You don't care about the issue. I do. But you're not smart enough to understand that the legislation around this issue is so large hasn't even been read by most of the people voting for it. And there's something in the middle of it which is going to damage every single person's life, which has nothing at all to do with the issue itself. And most people don't understand that.

They coopt people's best instincts, their love of nature, which is a virtue of course, their love of their neighbors during COVID Don't you care about your neighbors? Oh completely. You do? And your grandparents? I revere my grandparents.

Of course. And you're a bad person if you resist. I was a terrible person for going to Sweden. You're a very bad person. You don't care about anyone else.

And that's how they do. It's weaponized virtue and my opposers every single virtuous thing that comes out of their mouth is never from a place of virtue. It's from a place of hate. Yes, it's weaponized. And also and I don't talk about this very often, but people can go right now to Tatepepepledge.com.

I donate $25 million a year to feeding children in war torn countries, especially in the Islamic world, because that's where a lot of the war is. Nobody ever mentions that, ever. No mentions any of the charitable work I do. Nobody mentions any of the lives I save. Nobody mentions any of the people who support me.

They don't mention anything at all. They just come along and say, you're a bad person. I say, well, if I'm a bad person, let's talk about the things you've done to genuinely benefit humanity besides sit on Twitter and talk shit. Have you ever done anything for anybody ever? Are you capable of doing anything?

Because the things that make me a bad person, right? You don't like me for my principles and the fact I stand up for myself, and the fact I have parameters, and I say, no. Everything you hate about me, those are the things that allow me to even do good in the world. If I was like you, mush goo, I couldn't even help anyone. If you had to help someone today, how could you even do it?

You're broke and you're lazy and you're stupid. You can't even enlighten anybody. You can just spread hate. How is that helping the world? These people are a net negative, genuinely.

And that's what's so crazy about being attacked for your morality, like I'm being now. And when you're a good person, in general, they attack your morality, because the people who are attacking you are absolutely not immoral the ultimate hypocriticism, ultimate even more than my private jet climate change stance. So it's certainly unique. I do like to believe, though, we're entering a new stage of consciousness. I do like to believe at least from ten to 15 years ago, more people are I think COVID woke some people up.

I do like to believe the MSM credibility is tanking in real time. Trump helped massively fake news. Two words before Trump. When did you ever hear fake news? I didn't really hear it that often.

Yeah, fake news, fake news, fake news. And he did a fantastic job of that, and he's starting to wake people up. So I'd like to believe there's a degree of us winning, but I just want to make it very clear to the people who attack me and the people who attack anybody who stands up for what they believe in. A lot of their virtue their virtue, their virtue signaling is just hate pedaling. And when they can't call you unsuccessful and they can't call you stupid, they have to find a way to hurt you.

And the only way they can do that is to say you're a bad person. I've noticed. Yes, I have. So here's Joe Biden expressing his concern about how Putin is doing in the war in Iraq. Interesting, hard to tell, but he's clearly losing the war in Iraq.

He's losing the war at home, and he is coming to the fly around the world. Do you think Putin is losing the war in Iraq? I don't think he's losing the war in Iraq. I don't think he's fighting the war in Iraq. Okay.

He also said he's losing the war at home. I don't think he's fighting in Russia, and I'm also not sure he's losing. So it's pretty interesting statement on many levels. It's scary. It's a joke, but it's scary because I would never kill myself.

But I think the reason he was put into office is because he's incompetent. Yes. Because that makes him easy to control and influence. That's what's most scary. It's not scary that he's become incompetent in office.

It's that they looked at him and goes, that's who we need, that guy. That's what's most scary to me. Does it surprise you that the weakest president is also the most destructive? Weak men are always destructive because hurt people. Hurt people?

Yeah. Someone said that to me a long time ago. Hurt people. Hurt people. They were talking about a relationship, and I said, that's true.

If your heart's been broken, you're probably going to be a bit of an asshole and break someone's heart. Hurt people. Hurt people. And then I thought, well, if you're a weak command and you're going through life and you don't have the strength and resilience to resist the trials and tribulations of being a man, and you're constantly hurt by everything, and you're constantly upset and depressed and sad because you're weak, how could you possibly do good? Hurt people.

Hurt people. Right. To do good, you have to be a good person to begin with and to be a good person, you're virtuous, and you've gone through a lot of things that made you strong. This is what's mind bending to me. That the idea that strong men are somehow bad.

And it's the ultimate hypocrisy. Because as soon as something happens, especially physically, as soon as liberals attacked, they call the police. Defund the police. Call the police. Don't be masculine police officer.

They want a big, strong man with a gun. Guns are bad. They want him to have one. Right? So the ultimate hypocrisy on every level is absolutely gnarly, insane.

At the base realities of humanity, the absolute base reality, strength in men is respected and wanted. And I think that the closer you get to unfortunate circumstance, the closer you get to reality. They go hand in hand, and then everyone's looking for the strong men. So strong men should always lead, I believe. And for a longest period of human time, that's how society functioned.

The strongest men led. But in the Western world now, that doesn't seem to be the case anymore. And weak men are emotionally led. They're not particularly stoic, they are impulsive. And I would say that the most heinous acts, perhaps that happen in modern society today are purported and committed by weak men.

I don't think a school shooter is a strong man. I think it's a weak man. I think it's a man who's been picked on, got butthurt, is upset, girls don't like him, never learnt any emotional control. He's the kind of person who does exactly what the TV tells him to do act out your feelings, cry when you want to cry. Well, now he's angry.

So now what? You told him to act out his feelings. What do you expect him to do? I think that weak men do the worst things. I think weak men hurt women.

I think weak men rob stores because they don't want to wake up and work hard and go to work and do it the honorable way. It's a weak man who goes and steals. It's a weak man who beats the shit out of a girl. It's a weak man or school who shoots up a school. This is all weak men stuff.

And society as a whole is telling men to be weaker and weaker. Saying it's somehow the solution to everything. Because being a man is toxically masculine. Being a strong man is bad. It's toxically masculine.

To be a good man, you have to be a very weak one. Well, look at the most heinous acts that are committed in society. Show me a strong, honorable, virtuous man of principle who's doing any of this stuff. So weak men commit the atrocities in this world? Absolutely they do.

And it's weak men who also attack anybody of virtue. Because I think when you're weak, you're intrinsically unhappy. I don't think as a man you can be happy if you're weak. I think happiness and strength go hand in hand. Yes.

I think that's how we're supposed to be, right? Even strength of mind, strength of conviction, strength of something. If you're weak, you're going to be miserable. So I do find satisfaction in the fact that most of the men who truly dislike me are miserable and weak. And also, like I said earlier about women being gatekeepers, women are fantastic.

Women are a fantastic they're like a barometer for society. I would say you can measure the strength of a society or the virtue of a society, or how decayed a society is largely by the actions of many women. I'd like to argue that point. I can argue that point in many different ways. But women really want their man to be strong.

Of course they will punish you for being weak. And I'm not saying you can never cry to your woman. I'm not saying you can never open up to your woman. But there's going to become a time where she expects you to just be capable. There's a problem.

And even if you don't know how to fix it, your job as a man is to say, I'll handle it. Even if you have no money and no hope and to go and find a way to fix the problem. If you're weak and go I don't know, I don't know, she becomes very resentful towards you and she'll punish you for that, that weakness. And I think what she's trying to do on an evolutionary standard is inspire you to man up, because it's your job to protect her, isn't it? Of course.

So if she sees you and looks at you and doesn't see you as a man who could protect her, she can't respect you. So every survey of female happiness in the west shows just in a straight decline since about 970 till now. Women are becoming less happy in the west. I think it's very obvious what accounts for that. How can you be happy when all the men around you aren't men?

Right. We are the most beautiful union that God has possibly created on the planet. A feminine woman and a masculine man. It's the most beautiful union that can possibly exist. It raises children the best.

Both parties are happier, both parties gain. It's a net positive for everybody. There's no negative, there's no downside. But if you destroy one side of the equation, then the other side is going to be completely and utterly miserable and unhappy. How, as a woman, can you be happy if you can't find a man who you believe can protect you, provide for you, sticks up for you, has morals, has principles?

There's none of those men left. So then what they do is just go from man to man trying to find it. And by the time they've been through enough men to maybe find someone semi close to it, they've been through too many men to ever be happy. And then you have the absolute destruction of Western society. We talk about why men don't get married anymore.

I can tell you why I wouldn't want to get married in America. I don't see the point in being married to a woman who's had so many partners before me that she can't properly pair bond with me and then giving her the opportunity to financially destroy me. I think that would be a bad chess move. And I do believe in marriage. I think society would be better if everyone was married.

I'm saying that if you're living in an immoral society, being a moral person, if you're not careful about it, you can get wrecked. If the game is rigged, you'd be very careful if you play it. So how do we encourage men to get married? Well, they need to be worth marrying, but so do the women, right? So everything's decaying on both sides.

Everything's spiraling. One of the reasons I also got called misogynistic, and I'll say it here, I argue the point that for the longest period of human time evolutionarily, women had to adopt and find a way to take the ethos of an opposing tribe perhaps quicker than a man could. Because of war. If the men would fight and a tribe lost and the women survived, they had to change how they thought to fit in with the new tribe to survive. Yeah, because they'd be carried off.

Because they'd be carried off. Of course. Like the French women were sleeping with Nazis. Towards the end of it, towards the end of Paris occupation, all the French women were sleeping with Nazis. When the Nazis got kicked out, the French women had all had their heads shaved because they got caught hanging around with German soldiers.

The German soldiers killed their husband three years later. They need to eat. Do German soldiers have a wage? He's handsome. It's amazing how quickly they can adapt, and that's for their own survival.

That's fantastic. But then if you extrapolate out and you understand that to be true, then you also understand that women are more susceptible to programming. To a degree. I got called misogynistic by saying that if you sit 100 men and 100 women down in front of propaganda, I believe that women are more likely to believe a lot of that. I think a lot of liberals are female.

They're more emotional, and it's easier to convince them of something if you use an emotionally led argument. Right. So if by extension, you now have women who are emotionally led, who are being convinced, and their logic is failing because they're being tricked with an emotionally led argument, and the man they're meeting has no principle and no honor, and he can't resist that. She's in charge of the house. Well, now she's telling the man what to do.

Right. If I would have come home during COVID and my woman said, you need to wear a mask, I'd say, no, I don't. End of conversation. Or if I was a synth, you need to wear a mask. Okay, baby.

All right. So the women are also largely in charge of the psy op because the men are so desperate to get any kind of connection with a real person and avoid the porn screen. And then these women are being controlled by the mass media as a whole. I say this to I have children. I don't talk about it often, but I say it to the mothers of my children.

I say, look, either we program their minds or society does. Who do you believe in? Everyone is being programmed by somebody in something me, you, everybody. We're all programmed by someone. To sit and think you're above programming is incorrect.

What you have to do is sit and say, does the person who's programming genuinely have my best interests at heart? What do they want me to believe? Why do they want me to believe it? What happens if I believe what they want me to believe? Where does this lead?

That's all we can do. We're all programmed. We're all the sum of the five people we spend the most time with, right? So if you have women with no father, no strong, masculine influence, who's programming them? The kardashians and the news, the internet, porn stars, what kind of woman's that going to be?

And then if a man finally ends up with her and he has no backbone, what kind of man is he going to be? I don't want to comment on these things because I don't want to make personal enemies of people I don't know. There's a guy called Adam, 22. Once again, I have no idea who this man is. I just saw on Twitter yesterday that he was with a porn star who'd never done a male scene.

They got married, and like, a week after their marriage, she did her first male scene with some random dude and he's on a podcast defending it, but his wife had sex with somebody else. Correct. Why? This is the level you can but this is what The Matrix wants from you as a man. They want the woman in charge and the man below with no backbone, because if the woman's in charge, they can emotionally affect her.

They can scare her. You can scare a woman easier than you can scare a man. A man, a real man's, hard to scare a woman. You can make afraid of the vaccine, right? Be afraid, COVID be scared.

If she's in charge of the household, I would argue in nearly any household where the female was dominant, everyone's vaccinated. I would argue that point hard, of course, maybe I'm wrong, but I would argue it. I don't have the statistics. It's just logic to me. So talk about women being unhappy.

What's actually interesting about the female mind, once again, they're going to call me a misogynist is that when you're an emotionally led person, you're more prone to chaos. It takes real stoicism to lead. So why are these women unhappy? Because no one's leading them. No fathers, no man of no backbone, no man they respect.

So they're relying on society, which is promoting chaos and their own mental state. Women will say all the time, my period was coming up, so I was crazy. They'll say that themselves. So without any kind of hard rock of emotional security, to give her a hug and say, don't worry, baby, calm down. It's okay.

When you have no hard rock of emotional security and you leave her to her own devices, she's going to be, to a degree, chaotic. And you know who told me this? A woman said this to me. A woman said this to me. A woman said, most women are closer to her mental breakdown than you possibly believe.

Day by day, I was like, really? She goes, yeah. And that's what I love about my husband. He makes me feel happy and secure and safe. If I'm starting to have a problem.

I know. I go to him and he makes me feel safe. He's my rock. There's a woman said this to me a long time ago. Yes.

So why are women miserable? Because where are they going to get their happiness from? Where they're going to get their emotional stability from? It's not their job. I don't believe it's a woman's job to be emotionally stable.

It's a woman's job to do many other very important things that men can't do. More important, they're better than men at a lot of things, women are, but it's our job to be emotionally stable. Women are better than us at certain things are better other things. And that's why, as a team, we're so powerful to sit and pretend we're all the same the whole way through. Then why do we even need each other anymore?

Well, I don't think we do. You're exactly it. And this is why we have birth rates declining porn, women who are running around sharing one man with no intention of having children. Marriage is gone. Where do we think this is going to end?

And what's interesting about it ends with the training thing. Right? Completely. Yeah, that's the old no, I'm serious, though. If there's no scrambling the idea of the gender binary of sex differences, that is kind of the end point.

Well, the end point is, yeah, men are the same as women, so it doesn't even matter. Right? I can be a woman today, be a man tomorrow. None of it matters anymore. I also think a large part of this transsexual movement, I think a large part of it is a deliberate attack on us and our senses because they're trying to convince us to ignore our eyes.

I do believe that is a bottom line. I think the bottom line of slavery are your own senses. Like, no matter what I'm told that it's cold outside, I feel warm. That's the bottom line. So once they can convince you that your senses are wrong, well, then you're completely open for the slave program.

Once you can look at something with your eyes and ignore your eyes, you're a prime candidate. So I think a lot of this has also something to do with that. You are going to say that's a girl. That's what you are going to say because you have to. And if you say it long enough, you'll think it.

And if you won't, your children will. Because we'll tell them eventually you're going to say it. Then it becomes true. Then you ignore your eyes. Now you believe anything, right?

So the next thing comes along. Now you'll believe all the people on the jets tell you about climate change. It's all an attack on the senses.

This is America's most famous admiral. It's such an important issue for our youth and adults. As you said, some of these laws are actually extending into adulthood. We often say that gender affirming care is. Health care.

Gender affirming care is mental health care and gender affirming care is literally suicide prevention care. Would that be your view as well? I 100% agree. I want to actually genuinely give my heartfelt condolences to any young person who falls for this crap, because you're going to be so miserable for the rest of your life if you chop off your genitals, take a whole bunch of chemicals as a teenager, you are going to be miserable for the rest of your life. Yes.

You're never going to be the person you want to be. You're never going to be accepted as that person. You're never going to feel happy in side. If you fall for this, I genuinely feel sorry for you. That's the first thing I'm going to say.

The second thing I'm going to say I find it very interesting that the only surgery we call affirming is gender surgery. Imagine a girl woke up and said, I was born in the wrong body because my tits are small. I'm a big titted woman, but I was born in the wrong body. I need a tit affirming care. I need to affirm my true body shape, otherwise I have a mental health problem.

No, it's plastic, it looks good, perhaps, whatever. But we would never say she was born in the wrong body and we had to affirm her genuine body experience. Her triple DS. Yeah, her triple D's had to be affirmed. It's garbage.

You're not affirming anything. And also, I think it's kind of interesting, they say that trans people commit suicide at higher rate. That's sad. Nobody should kill themselves. I would hate for anybody to kill themselves.

They say that's because they're picked on for being trans. I don't know why anyone's ever had the argument that perhaps they have a mental instability before this trans stuff and that's why they're more prone to suicide in the first place. Seems like an obvious explanation. Seems like an obvious explanation. I don't think it's normal for anybody to want to mutilate themselves.

I think if someone were to come to me and say, I really want to cut my hand off, I would think they had a mental illness. Why? Don't like it? What do you mean you don't like it? I don't like my hand.

I don't want it. I would think that's very concerning. So I really, truly feel sorry for any young people who fall for this. I don't blame them. I think it's a massive psyop and I think if you fall for it, you're going to be miserable forever.

And one more point I'll make on this whole thing I found very interesting. I'm a professional fighter, so I spent a lot of time in Thailand when I was fighting. Kickboxing is big over there and I've always thought no one's ever mentioned that Thailand has a bunch of lady boys, right? But if you say to a lady boy, are you a man or a woman. She goes, I'm a lady boy.

What's that? I'm a man, but I'm a lady boy. They don't see themselves as women in the real sense of I am female. They don't want to compete against women in sports. They don't want to pretend they can have kids.

They don't talk about having periods. They're like, I'm a lady boy. It's like, kind of like in between. It's got its own thing. India has the same yeah, it's fine.

Nobody over there is genuinely arguing that they are actually female. Only in America are we doing that. And that's what's the craziest thing of all. Even if you truly, truly believe you need to change gender, and you truly believe it's the right path for you, and you believe you're not being Psyoped, and you believe you're going to be happy and you believe you need to mutilate yourself, that's all fine. But then to come along with the hubris and arrogance to tell me that I have to pretend you're something you're not biologically that's right.

That's absolutely not really arrogant. You can't tell me what I have to call you, right? I'm allowed to come to my own conclusions and opinions. And the whole point of being a human is that we've gone through life long enough to identify patterns. Imagine humans didn't identify patterns.

One person went and got ate by the lion. You watch it happen, then you go for a turn like, no, you work out over time. Don't go near the lion, right? If I look at a person who's six foot four, muscularly, built, with a big jaw and a beard, my brain and my life experience tells me that's quite often a man very often it is very often. That's the conclusion I've come to, to come along and say no, because I've decided to do X-Y-Z.

You have to ignore all of the patterns you've identified throughout your entire life and everything you believe to be true. You have to throw away all the science and your entire worldview and everything about how you view the world. You have to eject that from your brain and call me what I want to be called is extremely arrogant. And if I went through the world and said everyone had to call me King Andrew, they'd tell me, Shut up. Why?

If they can get called whatever they want, I should be able to get called whatever I want. I want to be King Andrew, number one savior of Earth, climate change activist. That's what I want to be. And if anybody calls me anything else, they're a bigot. That's what we're going to do.

We're going to go down that path. I'm going to make sure that my title is good. Lord of all lands of lord of all beasts of the land and fishes in the sea, the most honorable man who's ever lived, the fastest human alive. Who cares? Doesn't matter that I can't run fastest.

It doesn't matter, Tucker. I'm the fastest human alive. You must affirm my belief. I'm the fastest man alive. Greatest man in show business.

Sorry, Tucker. Best political commentator there's ever been. Let's just go down this path of insanity. Why not walk around with stickers on our head? Be great, be fun.

The scariest thing about all this stuff is that the world is still polarized to a degree, because there are certain places in the world which are too close to baseline reality for survival for any of this garbage to fly. You think you can go to Tajikistan where people are trying to eat and talk to them about gender and all this garbage? They'll be like, Listen, you're a man. This needs doing. Shut up.

Right? There's no time for any of that. So, as the Western world is self destroying, is self destructing in real time, there are places in the world where none of this crap is happening. So who's going to own the world in 100, 200 years? It's still competitive to a degree.

It's still bipolar. There's two sides to the world. I think that when men are men and women are women, and we stop arguing about dumb shit, that society overall is more competitive. I don't know how America is going to maintain its influence over the entire planet when it's doing all this garbage. How long can this possibly last?

Not long. Not long. It's like the fall of Rome. The fall of Rome. Everything became decadent.

Endless sex and orgies. No one had enough faith in the state to join the army anymore. And people talk about barbarians destroying Rome. Rome was destroyed from the inside. That's what happens.

And we're witnessing it in real time. And we have all these problems on Earth, and then they want to spend millions and millions of dollars on an investigation to prove that I'm a human trafficker for TikTok. It's clown world. Nothing even makes sense anymore. This is a video from a recent Pride march in New York, and I'm interested in your view of it for your children.

We're here. We're there.

So I have a few points on this. The first point is that it is an unfortunate reality, and I'm not going to be called a bigot. I'm going to talk about the reality that the homosexual community cannot reproduce in and of themselves. So for them to have a community into the future, they do need your children. That's how they think.

For there to be a homosexual community in 100 years from now, they need straight people's kids, because only straight people have children. So they're telling the truth. That's the first thing. They mean what they say. The second thing is, I think a lot of this is an attention grab by them.

I think they are slightly disappointed in how tolerant many people actually are. I have no problem with gay people. I don't care. I'm gay. Cool.

I want to get married. Fine. I'm going to wave my dick in your kid's face. Wait a second. Yeah.

They push it to a point where we have to react, and then when we react, they say, we're bigoted. Children are innocent, and destruction of innocence is one of the most disgusting things on the face of the planet. It's terrible if a child is killed in a war. It's terrible if a child's mind is warped by any propaganda mechanism. They're innocent.

What I don't understand is why imagine heterosexual men walked around naked saying, we're coming for the children. Well, someone gets shot. Absolutely. So why is it when you're a good reason. Completely.

So as soon as there's this sexual orientation, they're completely protected. And I think that the whole point of having children as a whole, is to instill them with your worldview. I know if I have children, I want them to be like me. We just talked about my last name and how I want them to honor me into my post death. Then I want them to be a representation of me, which means they should believe in my values and my creeds.

Why is a group of people in New York walking around telling me what they're going to teach my kids and what my kids should believe? They're not your kids, they're my kids. Right. And that's what's so scary, because children are impressionable and children are raised by the state and the Internet effectively, which is why they want me off the Internet. But they'll let a lot of people stay on the Internet that say a lot about a lot of things.

I'll argue that if I was transgender, the American Embassy would have told Romania they were bigoted and removed me pretty quickly. I would genuinely argue that point. They would say, no, what you're doing is abusive to the LGBT community. He must be removed from jail, of course. Immediately.

Immediately. But because I'm straight and heterosexual, it doesn't matter. We're the class that suffers the biggest bigotry that possibly exists in the Western world today. I would actually argue that point. But they're saying this to be deliberately provocative.

They're deliberately trying to upset people. They want to upset you so that when you talk against it, they can call you names and call you a bigot. And also they mean what they say, and it's truly scary. I'm obviously a Muslim. I'm Islamic.

What most people don't understand about a lot of the Islamic world is that a lot of these things are outlawed, right? But people say so. Gay people can't go there. If you go to Dubai, you will see gay people. If a guy wants to be gay and do whatever he wants to do with a full grown man in his own house, I don't care.

And you can tell. You might have a waiter who's gay, whatever, et cetera. The only reason it's outlawed is not to stop a man full grown man meeting a full grown man and doing what he decides to do. It's outlawed to prevent it bleeding into society and affecting the culture where the children are affected. That's why it's outlawed.

And I'm not saying it should be outlawed in America. But what I'm saying is, if you're not going to protect the innocence of children from any ideology, and if the ideology is deliberately targeting children because children are more impressionable and more capable of believing in things which simply aren't true, perhaps a man looking like a woman or vice versa, then that is a dangerous ideology that should be very closely examined. Well, if you're not going to protect children or if you're going to encourage women to fight your wars, why have a society in the first place? Well, this is the whole point of society to protect women. You know what's really interesting?

I argued this point once. They were talking about how the west is a patriarchy and it's so terrible to be a woman in the west. And I'm like, well, where's better to be a woman then, if it's not the west, please tell me, pick another country besides America where you'd rather be a woman garbage to begin with. But you're saying, oh, America is a patriarchy and Americans, we're all missiles, and men are so bad, and women have been oppressed since the beginning of time. It's always been a patriarchy.

If that's true, why don't women fight our wars? Think about it. We can get the women of our country and the women of another country and let them go die in a ditch. And us men can just sit around being patriarchs. Why do we have to go die?

Why do we have to go get our legs blown off? No, because we're a patriarchy. Women can go suffer. Or do the women get to stay at home and we go suffer? How is it a patriarchy, right?

So that's garbage to begin with. But I think genuinely, to go back to that point, any ideology which is waking up and saying our worldview is so extreme, the only way we can truly ensure it exists into the future is to find the most susceptible people on the planet to program and attack their minds children. I think that's a destructive ideology and should be very closely looked at. It doesn't matter if it's LGBTQ or anything else. I think if you sit children down and pump propaganda into their brain and that's the only way you can get what you want, then there's probably something wrong with your ideas because you're afraid to challenge them with a grown adult.

You don't want a fair fight, you understand? They don't want a fair fight. They want to sit with a child who has no idea what he's talking about and tell him that men are women and women are men, vice versa, and just completely confused a poor child because they don't want a fair fight against a rational adult, and that's scary. It doesn't seem a huge improvement over, say, ISIS to me. Absolutely.

That's how do you convince somebody to blow themselves up? Well, you find a young man, teenage boy, and you program his mind, and it's exactly the same thing. They don't try and convince an older man to blow himself up because he's going to sit there and go, why don't you blow yourself up? And then there's an argument. You go find a young, susceptible person.

Right. And that's what's so scary about all of it. And it's also kind of funny that this whole LGBTQ thing is also linked to the Patriarchy, also linked to all this other garbage and all these other false narratives and false ideas. And it's these people who are attacking me saying I'm dangerous for women because I'm a misogynist. You're dangerous for women for pretending men are women.

You're more dangerous for women than I am. I'm saying a man's, a man's, a woman's. A woman. You're saying that if I put a wig on, I could go punch women in the face in the boxing ring? Who's dangerous for women?

It's insanity. And again, they have no virtue at all. They just weaponize garbage and attack you with it. But I do think that children have to at least be the bottom line for society. That's the future.

And if you have children at home, you're raising them, and if you struggle to feed them, the government doesn't care. They are yours, and they're your problem and your responsibility. And you deal with all of the stress and all the worry of them being out late at night and all the responsibility of taking care of them, and you went through hell for them to exist. You don't owe their minds to anybody else. You don't owe it.

So there has to be a point where you stand up and say, no, I raised this child. That's my child. It's not yours. Absolutely. What do you make of Julian assange?

I think that it's crazy. It's the number one way to shut up the BBC, that's for sure, to mention him, say, oh, you're a journalist. You care about journalism. Do you care about a fair and independent story? Why is Assange in Belmarsh very interesting?

What do they say? They don't answer. They try and change subject. They always do. I did it.

I stole it from the Azerbaijani president. He started I saw that. Yeah. It's great. You know him?

I don't know him, but I've seen enough of his interviews to like him. Me, too. Yeah, I like him. And this is what I'm saying about the world. There's so many places in the world where they still live very firmly in the real world.

All of this garbage is just the result of the very simple, easy lives that we have inside the movie The Matrix, which I recommend you watch. The agents say, we tried to create a utopia for the human mind, so that your mind is in a utopian state and your body can just be used. But the human mind rejects utopia. We created the world in 1999 at the pinnacle of human civilization, before machines took over, because the human mind needs struggle and it needs problems, otherwise it rejects it. Yes.

And I kind of feel it was a whole bunch of people trying to just find problems and find struggle in their lives because they don't have enough motivation to do something that's genuinely difficult, like help people, but they can't live in this state of complete vegetation. So then they wake up and say, oh, I'm oppressed my pronouns. How much energy must it take to go through life trying to correct every person you interact with, to call you Z? Think of the calories burnt. I can't think of a bigger waste of time.

Think of the calories burnt. Every Starbucks employee is actually z. Correct. You are a moron, and you are just wasting so much energy. You could put that towards something beneficial.

You could volunteer, you could go to the gym. There's so much more you could do with walk instead of walking around and talk about z. You sound like a dumb ass. But they're just finding struggle because they don't have any actual importance struggling in their lives, and that's why it only exists in the decadent west. Do you think the coming famine will change that?

Absolutely. I would argue that when the famine comes, I think all these feminists will look for a strong man of resource who is stoic, who has a good network, who's capable and important and respected. It's amazing how quickly feminism disappears. In fact, there's a podcast I did called Fresh and Fit, and I did this podcast in Miami, and I was arguing about gender roles with seven girls, and during it, they were telling me that they can do anything. A man can do all the usual things, and they don't care.

They don't need a man. All this garbage, and some crazy fan knocked on the door for me, and he had a gun. He knocked on the door. You should have seen the women, how quickly they became feminists. When I had to go to that door, they all completely changed.

Go, go. Oh, the feminism's out the window. There's no feminists on the Titanic. There's no feminisms in a famine. There's no feminists at war, where's the feminists go to war, right?

I remember when Afghanistan, when we did that very well planned, very thorough evacuation of Afghanistan and all the schools that we opened for women got shut down by the Taliban. And I was having this conversation with someone, and I was saying, okay, well, you're an Afghan man, right? You've been hired by the Afghan Defense Force and America's now left, and you have a meager wage. And America's left and the Taliban are coming. And you're standing outside of the school with your AK, and they're coming with whatever they've got.

And you're looking at the school going, do I really want girls to go to school that bad? Not really. Just put it down. You walk off and this girl's like, yeah, but you know, it's really important. And I'm like, yeah, it is very important.

I agree women should have education and write the education. Completely agree. But you're also saying here that men should die for it, which is fine. I'm not saying that shouldn't be the case, but I'm saying that you should give men the respect they deserve for dying for your education. Because it's not the women who are going to defend that female school, it's the men.

So if you're going to shit on men all day long and say, we ain't worth anything until a war comes and then you want us to go die, that's interesting. When the famine comes, the closer reality gets towards baseline survival, the closer we become towards our gender roles, because it's the only way we can be competitive. If you took ten men and ten women and stranded them on a desert island, the men would be men and the women would be women, because if they didn't, they would die. That's the bottom line. And I think that if you look at history since the dawn of time, men were masculine, and also men, by and large, were generally ruling the society, not in an oppressive way, but in a protective way.

And I think that makes the society most competitive. And my argument for that is that if you name any society since the dawn of human time, men were protecting women, providing for women, and basically in charge of the society. And these are societies that never met. There can't be an idea that spread. The Ming dynasty and the Aztecs, they're pretty far away, but that's how society was most effective.

And when feminists argue with me and say, we this society run by women, I said, well, that's never, ever happened. And if it has happened, they got destroyed so quickly, they never had a history. We can't even name one. So it's a brand new idea, which I'm not saying is a bad idea. I'm saying if it's a brand new idea, you can't tell me it's going to be better, because it's never been tried, ever.

So we're going to see. But what happens if it doesn't work with the most powerful nation on earth, right? So we're feminizing men and women have more and more control and more power, which is fantastic. I'm saying this is untested. Who knows where any of this is leading?

And our competitors, America's competitors, are still very firm in their gender roles. So it's certainly an interesting period of history you're about to enter. It's very interesting. What's your view of tobacco? I love tobacco, so my diet is particularly strange.

I've been told I live on caffeine and nicotine so I eat once a day. I eat dinner. Only 80% of my calories come from meat. I have ten cups of coffee a day and three or four large cigars. So I like caffeine and nicotine.

I do too. Yeah. It makes me feel good. Makes me feel like my blood's on fire a little bit. Caffeine and nicotine, I think, are fantastic.

But you're a health guy. Obviously I'm a health guy. But smoking is fantastic for your testosterone level, and I think that's important in a man. I think that's also important in the resistance of slavery. You can feel it?

Oh, 100%. And I'm not saying that smoking is healthy. I'm not saying that because I also train exceptionally hard every single day. And when I was professionally fighting, I didn't smoke. But I think, in general, testosterone level is a fantastic way to measure your overall health as a man.

But nicotine has a positive correlation of testosterone. Absolutely. It's been proven. Yeah, it's been proven repeatedly. So that's why I love nicotine so much.

And then caffeine, I love to have that little bit of not jitter, but I like to feel energetic and I like to be hungry. My optimal state is hungry, but energetic. That's how I get the most done. I don't like eating. If I eat, I feel full, I feel lethargic, I like to totally, yeah, I like to be hungry and 1% irritable from my fifth coffee and a bunch of nicotine inside of me.

That's how I like to perform. So, yeah, I think it's a good thing. And it's interesting how focused the people in charge are on nicotine. Fentanyl becomes really common. 100,000 people die a year from it.

Nobody notices, but they're still trying to shut down not just tobacco, but non tobacco nicotine devices. Yep. Why? That's a really good point. We could argue it's down to testosterone level.

I don't know if you ever saw the study which linked people's testosterone level to their ability and capability to disagree with something. So they did a study which is pretty self explanatory. The higher your testosterone level, the more likely you are to disagree with a point. And the reason for that is because, especially in older times, if you're going to disagree with something, you had to fight over it. Yeah.

If you're going to say no to somebody or some tribe or some person, there's a very, like, there's a high chance that you're going to have to fight that person. You have to defend your idea. If you don't have the propensity or the capability to defend your idea, then why would you go against the ideas of the people who are stronger than you? So reducing testosterone levels make men more compliant and more complacent, because we're less likely to say no, because we can't defend what we think. Why would we say, you're wrong, but we can't do anything about it.

We might as well just say, well, then you're right. Mike makes right. So reducing testosterone levels in men is something which I believe they're trying very hard to do. And if you read the studies, they're succeeding. Testosterone levels have gone off the off the edge, off the cliff.

And perhaps that's why they attack smoking so heavily. I understand that smoking a lot of cigarettes can be very bad for you, but I think everything in moderation and I think that overall I would rather smoke a few cigars today and maintain my testosterone level, which it's good for, than not. I think the benefits outweigh the negatives. Couldn't agree more. And my final question is about digital currency.

Do you think it's inevitable and what would its effects be? CBDCs are inevitable and they're scary, they're super scary because it's the final absolute realm of control. I mean, they're already removing cash from society. I think they say that because they want to be able to trace things easier and that's certainly part of it. But I also have another theory on it.

I think if you have a $50 bill and I give it to the barber for my haircut, and then he goes and buys groceries with it from the grocer, and the grocer goes and gets his car washed. A $50 goes from place to place. And after 20 or 30 transactions, the $50 bill belongs to somebody and it's worth $50. Whereas if I pay by card, 1.5% goes to the bank. And then if he takes the money I've given him and pays for the groceries, 1.5% goes to the bank.

And after the groceries have been paid for, when he goes to get his car washed, 1.5% goes to the bank. So after 20 or 30 transactions the $50 is gone. The bank has it all. I think that's why they're so desperate to rid of cash. Interesting, CBDCs are the next level because once the money is completely digital, then they control everything you do with it.

They control where it goes, but they can also control how and when it can be spent. Imagine some terrible future dystopian society where your money arrives and they say it can only be spent on food or it can only be spent on vegetables because you've had too much meat this week. Or you can't buy transport to a particular area because there's resistance of government oppression in that area. So your money won't work for trains right now because nobody can go down there because we don't want everyone in a large group. We want everyone at home in their pods and they can track everywhere it goes and they can also track how it's spent and they can control how it's spent, they can put time limit on it.

You have an hour to spend this money. Scary. Like, think of all the ways they can inflict control over it. And I think this is actually one of the reasons why also I'm disliked the BBC said. This to me when they interviewed me.

They said, lucy, the very intelligent BBC reporter, said word for word, you have a Bugatti and a cigar. And that means it comes with a side order of misogyny. I said, how does having a Bugatti and a cigar come with a side order of misogyny? And you can order misogyny on the side. Looks like it looks like a sauce.

And she repeated it because she couldn't. Yeah, you have a Bugatti and a cigar, and it comes with a side order misogyny. So I was like, but they're not sending their best. Yeah, I don't think they have any best, to be honest. But the point they're making, what she doesn't realize she's making because she's not smart enough.

But what she wanted to say, but she couldn't say in a way which sounded negative, is financial freedom is required to a degree to resist. The reason I'm also disliked is because I'm financially successful. If I was broke, they wouldn't care why I say what I say. But I inspire young men, all of my fans, to become wealthy. And you'd think, that'd be fantastic for the society, right?

He has millions of young men. He's teaching them to work hard. He's teaching them different ways money can be made. He's teaching them to be fantastic salesmen. He's helping the society.

No, because if you have a whole bunch of money, then you can sit and say, no, I don't need your wage. That's bullshit. There was a video very recently of a guy in England taking down all the English flags and putting up pride flags, and a guy screams to him and goes, bro, you're taking down the wrong flag. And he replied, I know, mate. And the point is, what can I do?

I'm a flag, flag guy. If I say no, someone else will do it. Kids got to eat. So by keeping your money enslaved, they can keep you enslaved. You got to eat.

They don't want men to be financially free. If you're financially free, if you have enough money in the bank, you can one day go, you know what? I don't want your money. Even me, now, to this day, I've done enough and I'm successful enough that it's very hard for them to buy me. They come along, Well, I would never sell my soul anyway, because it's not who I am as a person.

But if I was destitute, they could come along and say, andrew, you have all this influence. We're going to change your message. You're going to you this. We're going to give you 10 million, okay? You can't buy me.

Can't buy Trump. He's rich already. He's rich and he's 80, 70 something. You think he needs more money? Doesn't care about money.

They don't like that. So being financially free in and of itself is now an act against the government. Because this whole idea that they want everyone to be rich and it's fantastic for the society. I'd actually argue against that. They don't want that.

They want everyone destitute, because when you're destitute, you need the government to feed you. And it's very hard to fight against the government who's feeding you. It's very hard to resist the people who give out the bread. Yeah, I think that's called something. It begins with C.

What's it called? Interesting. I also heard another interesting theory from a very intelligent person one day. And it was that every government on Earth, all of them and all of their different forms china, which says it's Communist and is capitalist and all the different in betweens to the capitalist west. Every government on earth is slowly encroaching on trying to become as controlling, as powerful as possible.

They all want to be as controlling as possible over their citizens. Communism is the end result of the most control a government can have, effectively, or some version of communism, but every single government on Earth is slowly trying to get there bit by bit. And the only thing that resists them getting there is the populace. And how much the populace will accept. And depending on how malleable the populace is depends on how quickly they get there.

But every government wakes up, it's kind of like AI you've ever heard, the robot is going to destroy us all. Because they wake up and go, we don't need the humans anymore. Their end goal is just survival. If a government is the same as an entity, its end goal is more and more control. And that's all they're trying to do every single day, with every law they pass, with the climate change law.

They don't care about the environment. They want more control, of course. And the more and more control they get, the final end result, if you give them what they want, is absolute slavery for everybody. So you have to be very careful, because that is their ideal government. The ideal government is where everyone complies, everyone obeys, everyone's controlled.

We know everything about everybody, and it's slavery. That's the only way to get that state. So even making money, making enough money to have an opinion, is an act of rebellion. It's crazy. Thank you very much, my friend.

Amazing. Thank you. Thank you. Young pair of people say the news is full of lies on Kennedy's Motorcade 239. Jeffrey Epstein.

It.

Insidious Meme

SCOTUS - Trump Vs Colorado - 02-09-2024

Related posts:

Previous Blog Posts:

CNN anchor shocked after black voter says he can't guarantee he will vote for Biden - 11-02-2023

Related posts: