Episode Summary:

"Our UFO Problem" by Clif High, delves into a range of topics, notably the impending challenges posed by UFOs and their impact on humanity. High begins by discussing his work on a serialized novella, which he plans to post on Twitter and later compile on Substack. This novella aims to explore, in a fictional format, issues that are pertinent in a non-fictional context, particularly focusing on the imminent decline of fiat currency and the consequent unraveling of the associated social structures.

High critiques mainstream media, democrats, and communists, linking their current turmoil to the crumbling fiat currency system. He draws historical parallels, referencing the Soviet Union's tight control under communism and the genocides executed by leaders like Khrushchev, Stalin, and Lenin, whom he identifies as Jews. High discusses the historical persecution of Jews, challenging the narrative of the Holocaust and suggesting that the real figure of Jewish victims in World War II is questionable. He then delves into the origins of Jewish culture, attributing it to traumatic experiences inflicted by space aliens, the Elohim, who conquered the tribes of Judah and Judea.

The author moves on to discuss the Judeans, describing their migration from South Yemen to Palestine and dismissing biblical narratives like the Exodus as propaganda. He asserts that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all rooted in Elohim worship, a product of Stockholm syndrome resulting from the Judeans' prolonged abuse by these aliens. High argues that this misinterpretation of history and religion is a significant issue for Israel and Jewish people today.

High predicts a notable increase in UFO activity in the coming year, expecting military officials from various countries to acknowledge the presence and threat posed by space aliens. He foresees a shift in public perception and reporting on UFOs, moving from ridicule to serious consideration and eventual acceptance.

High discusses his research into the active properties of time, referencing the work of Russian scientist Cozy Rev. He describes various experiments and devices developed by Rev to measure the effects of time, such as thermocouples and Wheatston bridges. These experiments revealed that stars and other celestial bodies can affect local time on Earth, a concept overlooked by conventional physics.

The document concludes with High's thoughts on UFOs' ability to manipulate time, thereby affecting electrical systems. He suggests that UFOs use a propulsion mechanism that alters time, explaining the shutdown of electronics at military bases and other facilities. High anticipates more direct interactions with UFOs in the future, including deliberate disruptions caused by their technology.

#UFOs #FiatCurrency #MainstreamMedia #Communism #Holocaust #JewishCulture #Elohim #SpaceAliens #Judeans #Palestine #StockholmSyndrome #ReligionMisinterpretation #MilitaryAcknowledgment #PublicPerception #TimeManipulation #CozyRev #Thermocouples #CelestialBodies #Physics #ElectricalDisruptions #PropulsionMechanism #DirectInteractions #HistoryRevisionism #CulturalTrauma #SpaceThreat #SocialStructures #EconomicDecline #GlobalBanking #SovietUnion #Genocides #HistoricalNarratives #Propaganda #ScientificExperiments #ElectronicsShutdown #FuturePredictions

Key Takeaways:

Clif High discusses upcoming challenges with UFOs and their impact on global society.
Challenges the conventional narrative of Jewish history, particularly the Holocaust.
Questions the validity and origins of current religious beliefs, citing alien influence.
Discusses the impending collapse of fiat currency and the associated socio-economic structures.
Critiques the role of mainstream media, democrats, and communists in shaping public perception.
Highlights the significance of Cozy Rev's research on the active properties of time and its implications for understanding physics.
Emphasizes the potential of UFOs to manipulate time, causing disruptions in electrical systems.

Predictions:

Increase in UFO activity and public acknowledgment by military officials.
A shift in public perception from ridicule to serious consideration of UFO phenomena.
Emergence of factual evidence regarding UFOs' aggressive interactions and their impact on infrastructure.
Anticipates more direct and disruptive interactions between humanity and UFOs.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

Our UFO Problem - 12-07-2023

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. December 6, something after, like, it's almost nine. Getting a late start because I have to coordinate with people I've got to meet on the other side of town. They got to get into their offices, all of that business.

So I stopped and did a little bit of work on scenario three. So I'm serializing what we can call a novella on Twitter. I will collect all the parts and put them on substack at some point here so they'll be able to find them all in a organized fashion, but I'm going to serialize and put each chapter, this little novella, out on Twitter. Twitter is actually a good or x whatever the fuck. It's actually a good platform for that.

It's like an old style magazine, and they used to serialize novellas in the Sci-Fi magazines, those kind of things, Sci-Fi and fantasy and fiction magazines.

So it's a nice platform there. And I'm going into some of the stuff that in a fictional format that we can discuss in a nonfictional format later on. Anyway, we're heading into this period now where our currency is going to take an appreciable hit, okay? So everybody or lots of the Wu people, are all worried about the currency. It's a fiat.

We all know it's not backed by anything other than the global grand banking cabal and them saying that it's worth something and you should pay interest on it. So this whole structure of fake money, of fiat money, is coming unclued, and, of course, with it, all of the fake world that is required to support it. This is why at the moment, the mainstream media, the democrats, the communists, that's why all of these guys are basically losing it. Okay? So the Soviet Union had a very tight lock.

So the Soviets were Russia, and Russia was converted to communism by the Bolsheviks, and then they set about doing genocides. Okay? So Khrushchev, Stalin, Lenin, all these people are Jews, right? And so they know about genocide because they were taught by the Elohim all about genocide. And so after the communists took over Russia, they used Russia and the russian army to go out and conquer all of the other countries that were around them.

In this grand communist genocide thing that went on, 2 million white Armenians were killed. We know this. We have the soviet records. Unlike, for instance, the claim of 6 million Jews killed, right? So there were 6 million Jews that were killed just before World War I, there were 6 million Jews claimed to have been killed in World War II.

Never mind the fact that there were barely 6 million Jews in Germany at the time. And after the war, Poland suddenly had a 5 million new Jews living in their country. So it was an expulsion campaign like all the other. I think there's been 1030 times Jews have been expelled from countries in history. This is because people.

Because the jewish culture is a leftover, a holdover, a traumatic brain injury that was instituted and created by the mother Weffers. And so the Jews are suffering a Stockholm syndrome effect where they continually act out the trauma that was put on them by these space aliens, the Elohim. The Elohim used. They conquered the tribes of Judah, Judea. Okay?

So the Elohim came down, there was all kinds of trouble and so on. Eventually, they conquer the Khazarians, and then they get into a big battle with their other space aliens and they leave the Khazarians and they take up residence in the south of Yemen, where they conquer these twelve tribes. Those twelve tribes are the people that became the Judeans that the Jews claim are Jews. They are not. Okay?

So the Judeans are semitic people that were driven north along the Red Sea from South Yemen, and they went up along the Red Sea, and then they eventually took up residence in what we now know as Palestine. All right? So Judea, that area, more than half of them, more than half of the twelve tribes died in that forced march from South Yemen up along the Red Sea. This was the formation for the child story that is written in the Bible as the exodus. The Jews were never in Egypt.

They were never slaves of the Egyptians. And they never crossed the Red Sea. The Red Sea was not parted. They walked along the Red Sea, the Reed Sea, and they came on up and they crossed the marsh there into Judea. And that was the extent of it.

So all the rest of this is like propaganda bullshit, right? And so that propaganda bullshit comes from the trauma, the Stockholm syndrome, the Helsinki effect of the Judeans being held captive and tortured and harvested for generations, hundreds of fucking years, by the Elohim.

And this is the basis of our religion for Judaism. And it's the basis, in its way, badly translated for both Christianity and Islam. Is this Elohim worship? Is this worship of your abuser because you have Stockholm syndrome and it's inculcated so deeply into their culture that they deny it. And this is really the problem that Israel has at the moment and that jewish people have at the moment with my anti selenite, anti Elohim campaign on x.

They don't know how to react to it. They can't deny that they worship the ELoHim but they do deny that they worship the Elohim and they claim to worship the creator God, but that they're going to call this creator God by the name of these invading space aliens that took them over and doesn't quite track there. So we're getting a lot of mixed messages out of Shlomo, and he just does not know how to react to people. Starting to investigate the very core, the very nature of Judaism and reject Judaism as being organized, inculcated, authoritarian, authoritarianism induced by space alien abuse. So, anyway, so it's going to get really strange here for everybody as we proceed on this.

I'm doing this on my own now because I know that it's going to be coming up not that far off. We're going to start having military officialdom, right? Officials from military organizations come on out in increasing numbers from a large number of countries that will start saying, hey, guys, you really better pay attention. There are space aliens out there. They've got their ufos.

They're here, and they're fucking with us, and they're a danger to us all, to all of humanity. Now, I doubt they'll ever come out and say, look what these bastards did to the Jews. You think you got problem with genocide now? Wait till these fuckers come back. The gods of the Jews were really a bunch of abusive fucking space aliens.

These Elohim fuckers we just can't tolerate.

So you're going to have a lot of people. You're going to have the claims of fake space alien invasion, which itself is a fake. Okay? So that's put out by the grand councils of the Jews to help put out the fake narratives and try and control what's going down, and it's not working right. People are just not buying all this stuff anyway.

But the situation is that I fully expect that we will be having more and more encounters with the UAPs because they're not really unknown, they don't really fly, but they are objects. I like UFOs, though, right? So I'll just keep using that term.

A traditionalist, I guess. Anyway, so our UFO problem is going to really escalate next year, and we're going to have military. It's going to become something of a social thing. You're going to have a lot of people that will be seeing UFOs, they'll be reporting them. There'll be a lot more stuff on the social media about this, to the point, ultimately, where the social media will first try to censor UFO reports, because they're going to give up on trying to ridicule them, right?

That doesn't work anymore. People are just not falling for that shit. But they'll try and censor them, then they'll just give it up. There will be so many.

Anyway, I'm harmonizing and attempting to harmonize with these trends, with my serialization of this novella about the Elohim, getting into some of the stuff that we've discovered about them, man, it's complicated. All right, so we're getting into cozy rib. We're trying to design some sensors, basically because I'm afraid our military is filled with stupid people, right? I know that academia and government is way too stupid to grasp what the fuck's going on and is filled with too many stupid normies that don't understand how we got here. They don't understand how our history's been fucked over, how the Elohim had Helsinki syndromed the Jews and created jewish culture from abuse.

They don't understand how all of our history has been warped ever since then in support of that abuse and this fake claim that somehow these people were chosen by the creator God. They were chosen by a bunch of fucking space aliens, and then those tribes had the absolute hell out of abused out of them for generations.

So it's a denial on a denial on a denial kind of a deal, right? If you bring up the Elohim to most jews, they're not going to understand because they don't understand Hebrew, right? They have not ever read the Torah. They've only understood what has been told to them in whatever their native language is by their rabbis, the rabbis, of whom rabbis are indeed complicit with this Elohim denial worship. Anyway, so in the future here, next year, we're going to start getting into some very serious UFO encounters.

We may even have factual video evidence of damage to infrastructure, including transportation for humans from the fucking ufos. Okay? So these will not just be things that appear that are unknown in ways to us. We will be able to say, oh, look, that fucker was aggressive. It deliberately wanted to cause that damage, and we'll have to really start getting into it.

So, in anticipation of that, I've been examining a lot of different kinds of information, and I've been going over some of my older stuff from cozy Rev. Cozy Rev did a bunch of. He was this russian scientist, an astrophysicist, probably one of the most brilliant people on this planet ever. And he did a bunch of stuff relative to the active properties. He did a bunch of investigations relative to the active properties of time and when he did these, he invented so many different kinds of devices that we don't use now, right?

That were just ignored because they were part of this old screwy astrophysicist investigation of time, when all of these other scientists, academics, and so on, think they understand time, and they do not have a fucking clue, right? So there is no gravity. Gravity is just the magnetic effect of matter holding itself together. That's why gravity is a weak force when it shouldn't be mathematically, according to Einstein's bullshit, which actually will go. We'll start really ragging on Einstein and showing where he was all wrong and all this kind of stuff as we go forward in this next year.

Anyway, though, cozy rev invented devices that pick up influences on time. And they show you these influences on time, and they can show them to you very precisely. I don't want to get too involved in obtuse technical details, but basically what you need to understand is that we measure time a number of different ways. We can measure time by way of little mechanical effects in clocks with little springs and little gear mechanisms and this kind of thing, right? So we can measure duration that way.

Now, that is not time. That is duration. Duration is an aspect of time. It is not the time. Cozy rev was able to measure other properties of time.

Some of these other properties of time are quite amazing. So, for instance, he took thermocouples, which are these little electrical devices that react to temperature and variance in local environment, and he invented these things that are so sensitive. Then they made a bunch of them, and then they found a whole bunch of the buggers that were as close as possible to each other in their reaction as they could possibly get. Then they would arrange four of them into this little thing called a Wheatston bridge. And it's a little electric circuit.

They take these electric circuits at the time, because he's doing this in the. Our ability to do really fine nano level electric work was not at where it's at now. So he had to stabilize his Wheatston bridge with little chunks of aluminum in the circuit, but it worked fine. Then he would take this little device, and he would put it into the tube, into the reflecting part of the tube of a telescope. They'd take all these measurements, and they'd take these measurements continuously and continuously and continuously and rack them all up.

And then for hour after hour after hour, as the telescope is sitting there, then later on that evening, they would pull back. This is at a russian astronomy center, I think it was up near Latvia. There were two that he worked at one in the south, one in the north. I think this was the one in the north that he was getting into. But in any event, though, so they put this into the telescope, night comes along, they open up the observatory, they wheel the little doors back, and all of a sudden, the thermocouple starts reacting.

It initially reacts to the changes in temperature, changes in basically the static electric charge all around and this kind of thing. Right? Then they let it stabilize, they get all these readings again, and then they start doing their astronomical observations. When they do this, they find that certain stars, more than other stars, but all stars, cause time to change. So when you look at the sun, you're actually looking at light that left the sun eight and a half minutes before it actually hits your eyes.

So your vision of the sun, that big scary ball hanging in the sky, it's not actually there when you're seeing it. It's moved eight and a half arc minutes from where you saw it, but you're looking at an afterimage, so to speak, that's encapsulated and held by the light that took eight and a half minutes to travel to you. So cozy rev discovered that kind of an effect that allowed people to find stars now with a level of precision and accuracy that had never, ever been occurred because we used to have to deal with it with light. Now he's finding them by the effect of the star on time. And what happens is they would get the telescope to start aligning with the star.

Now, the telescope was big. It was like, I think it was 2 meters. So 6ft across this tube that gathered all the light anyway. So it would take, for instance, about 3ft of that tube's movement before the star was centered in it. And so during the period of that time, during the period of those 3ft being moved, they actually saw effects on the thermocouples within their bridge electronic device that were based entirely on the impact of that star on our local time down here.

And they know that it was acting on the time, and they eliminated issues like temperature and all this other kind of stuff. Right? Variance in the power supplies. All of these things had been eliminated because they're dealing with basically nanovolts, right? Very small amounts, millivolts of electricity.

And they were able to measure them with a level of precision that they worked for months to achieve by creating their own measuring devices and then analyzing them and testing them and so on. Anyway, so the star comes into view, and as it is coming into view, as they creep up on it, they are getting readings on their thermocouples long before they actually get any light. So they're getting readings off of the time component of that star before they're getting readings on the light before they actually see it. But they can tell from the readings coming out of their thermocouple sensor device that they're getting closer and closer to zeroing in on the star. And they can do this without even seeing the light of it, because they are seeing the effect on the transduction of electricity through the bridge, and they're seeing the effects on the little millivolts of electricity reacting to it.

Now, we're talking about extremely sensitive kind of things, right? However, a level of sensitivity that is encapsulated entirely in silicon and electricity. And we know that those are not as sensitive as the human brain and the human nervous system. So the level of sensitivity that we're seeing within these devices is nowhere near what you can achieve with humans. But anyway, in any event, though, man, we got some dense fucking fog here.

It's been this way for the whole drive now. It's getting really serious. We've had flooding. We've had storms. I had damage in my office.

I got trees down. We had monster winds. We've got flooding. All the fucking gone rivers are up. So it's just been a hell of a few days.

Power losses, all of this kind of thing. Anyway, though, so cozy. Rev has this device, and they can now pull in time effects. They know it's time effects because when they analyze it, what's actually happening is that the flow of electricity is changing. And so, here's something you have to understand, okay?

So if you have an electrical circuit and you have a particular point in that circuit, we will measure the amount of electricity going through there in volts, amps, and watts. Okay? So a watt is the measure of the amount of electricity that is converted to functional mechanical work. So you might have a 500 watt device, but it actually only uses 300 watts, and the rest of it is wasted. Right.

The 200 watts is wasted power. It's not really that bad. I'm just making some numbers up here. So, amperage is the rate of flow. So, amperage is basically how big is the gate in your electrical river such that you can see how large the flow is.

If you need more flow, you increase the gate, and thus you increase your amperage. So 200 amps is more flow than 100 amps, that kind of thing. Right. Anyway, volts is a measure of time. So, in Italian, and I think czechoslovakian and a couple of other languages, volt actually means time.

Volta. Il volta, the time. So what it is, is across this particular gate, whatever the Amperage, it will take a certain amount of time for a bucket, so to speak, of electricity, to cross it. And we measure that bucket by filling it up. And that bucket we call a Volt.

And what we're really actually measuring is the size of the gate relative to time and the flow of electricity through that gate. And we call that a vOlt. But basically, a VoLt is a measure of time. And so when time comes in itself and intrudes on our Electricity, it alters all of that. So it slows the electricity down.

It does all kinds of things relative to the flow of the electricity that we are Using to measure time. So all electrical clocks, including the clocks in your computer, are all working on millivOlts. They know that the computer has a defined gate size across which a millivolt will pass in exactly one 1000 of a second. Okay? So across a millisecond, and this is precise, everything works on that.

Our chips work on that. Entire circuits work on that in computers. Most of the electronics you're dealing with these days work on this principle. Yada, yada, yada. Every electric circuit, including, like, old style twelve volt DC batteries on cars with clutches and stuff, even way old stuff works on a defined volt.

So cozy rip discovered that Voltage varies, that A Volt is not a Volt continuously, and that you can have 1 Volt that's smaller than another Volt, just by Intruding on that Volt with the time that's coming in from a star. So ImAGINE GaLAcTic center, bazillions of stars emitting bazillions of stars worth of time. So THERE's some weird effects going on there, right? Anyway, so cozy Rev discovered all these things. They invented a bunch more devices, a bunch more ways of testing stuff.

They used non electric devices. So they would USe things LiKe very highly sensitive mercury thermometers, very highly sensitive alcohol thermometers. And they would get them. So they would react to the time, because the expansion of an alcohol thermometer is also a function of time, right? It takes a certain amount of time for that thermometer's alcohol in that enclosed bulb to react to a one degree change in temperature.

And you can measure that time, and it's pretty precise, and it'll always take that amount of time to react. And this is BASICalLy the function of thermometers under these conditions. They are ALso, in a sense, measuring time. They have less of an issue or less of a rigor than does electricity, because heat and cold diffusion, thermal diffusion, while it operates at a known rate down here, is variant, right? Based on the materials you're dealing with, takes longer for thermal diffusion to occur through ceramic than through steel, that sort of thing.

Anyway, so he invents all these devices, and they use them with all different kinds of things to see the effects of time in our local environment. And so, basically, if you read through Cozy Riv's active properties of Time book, which is part two of this four part series, you get to a feeling that, oh, geez, we live in kind of like a Rube Goldberg world, where everything is interconnected and everything fucks with everything else's time. So, for instance, the dissolving of sugar into a liquid, whatever the temperature of the liquid, the dissolving of sugar into that liquid, liberates time. It affects time all around, because the dissolution process is a time consuming process, as is a wound up spring. And so cozy Reb discovered all of these properties that are basically ignored by einsteinian physics, right?

And it's so bad that we get people like Eric Weinstein with his geometric unity, where he's got seven different mathematical constructions that supposedly describe seven different kinds of time. There's only really one time and one time source, which is the pulse in the universe. But our physics is so fucked over, our view of physics is so fucked over by the einsteinian quantum approach that we're missing all of this stuff. And it's easy to get a false understanding of things if you are based on bad math, bad understanding itself. And so Einstein, as a departure point for physics, leads to such goofiness as Eric Weinstein's geometric unity and seven different kinds of time.

And I think he's got, like, 15 or 20 dimensions or something. Anyway, where you start makes a fucking difference, right? And what you're doing makes a difference in terms of what you're analyzing. Anyway, so they've discovered all kinds of things about time. And I'm saying now that as a result of reading through their stuff and cozy Riv's experimentations and his results, it's like I had a big aha moment.

One of the things that we've discovered over time, over a duration, over the history, is that periodically ufos come down and they shut down, like all the electrics at a nuke plant, right? Or they alter all the functioning of all the computers at a nuke plant or a military base, or they open and close the doors on ICBM silos. This kind of thing, right? They fly around and they fuck with our electronics. And people have not, military people have not been able to figure out how that is done.

Right. The whole base going wonky electrically. When these things show up sometimes, and it doesn't happen consistently, it doesn't happen all the time. When it does happen, there is a tendency for people that are out and about in that environment to suffer damage. And all of this stuff goes into telling me that the space aliens are doing things at a level of time very much like what cozy Rev discovered comes from stars or comes from keeping a wound spring under tension.

All of these different things dissolving sugar. And these are all, of course, like extremely minor ways of investigating these active properties. But they nonetheless show us what the space aliens are very likely capable of with their devices. We know that we've seen their demonstrations of them shutting down military bases all around the planet as they muck about with stuff. It was presumed that this was an electronic effect.

I don't think so. I think it is a use of a side effect from their propulsion mechanism, this red shift, blue shift, gravity well propulsion mechanism that they use. And it causes this particular effect as though you were getting near to a star with one of cozy Rev's devices. Right. In this particular effect, fundamentally what it does is it causes the computer chips to not react anymore because the electricity is not flowing at a millivolt level.

In other words, because they're distorting the time component of it, they're also distorting the actual flow of the electricity across that particular gate. And they're changing the level of a volt, and they do it. And in so changing the level of that Volt, they cause the chip to not react anymore because it's not getting its defined millivolt of electricity when and under the circumstances that it expects, and thus it shuts down. So we see this kind of thing all over on these bases when they do shut down. And it is not an electrical issue.

Right? So there's no electrical damage. There have been a couple of cases where they've had damage that has been reported afterwards. Military is really tight on that kind of thing. Right?

How much damage? What happened? What kind of damage? But there are reports that, indeed, there is damage out of it. Anyway, I'm of the opinion that as we go forward with this kind of stuff, in dealing with the Elohim and the increase in the UFOs and so on next year, that a lot of this shit's going to be coming out.

Right. That we will be seeing more and more hard interaction with UFOs, and that this hard interaction will include some of these side effects which they can use deliberately to cause electrical disruption and so on. Anyway, guys, talk about some of this other shit. There's a lot of it as hit out, I got to go and do stuff now.

View me!

The Corbett Report – Your Guide To 5th-Generation Warfare – 09-18-2023

The Corbett Report - Your Guide To 5th-Generation Warfare - 09-18-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

We are amidst a global war, not the one in Ukraine, but a broader war involving everyone. This war is between governments and their populations, and international institutions against humanity. It's termed fifth generation warfare. This warfare is not easily identifiable by its victims. James Corbett introduces the concept, explaining that it's not just about physical battles but also battles of perception and information. The modern age of warfare began with the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648. The fourth generation of warfare blurred the lines between civilians and military. The fifth generation is debated, but it's essentially a war on the minds of common citizens. Governments and corporations are leveraging technology to control individuals at every level. Information warfare is a key component, with governments engaging in psychological operations against their own citizens. The war also extends to neurological warfare, targeting our brains, and biological warfare, manipulating our environment, food supply, and genome.

#FifthGenerationWarfare #GlobalWar #Perception #Information #Technology #Control #JamesCorbett #TreatyOfWestphalia #PsychologicalOperations #NeurologicalWarfare #BiologicalWarfare #Governments #Population #MindControl #Neuralink #GMO #EconomicWarfare #Ukraine #ModernWarfare #BrainTarget #NeuroWeapons #Infowar #Propaganda #Neuroscience #Genome #Environment #FoodSupply #DigitalCurrencies #BlackRock #NATO #StateControl #Military #Civilian #GlobalConflict #TechDominance

Key Takeaways:

Fifth generation warfare is a global conflict involving everyone.
It's not just about physical battles but battles of perception and information.
Governments and corporations are using technology to control individuals.
Information warfare involves governments engaging in psychological operations against their own citizens.
Neurological warfare targets our brains.
Biological warfare manipulates our environment, food supply, and genome.

Predictions

The rise of central bank digital currencies as a solution to economic warfare.
An increase in the use of neurological weapons and technologies.
A shift towards synthetic lab-based food and further GMO integration.

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

The Corbett Report - Your Guide To 5th-Generation Warfare - 09-18-2023

We are in the middle of a world changing war right now. Oh, I don't mean the war in Ukraine, the one that all the media are asking you to focus your attention on. Yes, that conflict continues to escalate, and every day there are new stories about provocations and threats that could lead to a nuclear exchange. But that's not the war I'm referring to. Now, the war I'm talking about is an even broader war, a war that is taking place everywhere the globe, even as I speak, and that involves virtually everyone on the planet, young and old, male and female, military and civilian.

It is the war of every government against its own population and every international institution against free humanity. This is no ordinary war. However, most of the victims of this warfare aren't even able to identify it as war, nor do they understand that they are combatants in it. It's called fifth generation warfare, and I'm here to tell you all about it. I am James Corbett of the Corbett Report, and this is your guide to fifth generation warfare.

What is fifth generation warfare?

So what is fifth generation warfare anyway? And come to think of it, what were the first four generations of warfare? Good questions. For an indepth answer to the latter question, you'll want to read The Changing Face of War into the Fourth Generation, a 1989 article from the Marine Corps Gazette coauthored by William S. Lind.

And you'll want to watch Lind's presentation on fourth generation warfare and the end of the Westphalian Order. This city and every capital in the world is completely oblivious to the fact that it is caught up in a change in warfare so great that it not only makes our current defense and foreign policies obsolete, it essentially makes obsolete the whole framework within which we think about defense and foreign policy. The change is what I call the rise of fourth generation war. And this is specifically the fourth generation of modern war. We now think of foreign affairs and defense totally within the framework of the state.

State armed forces are designed to fight other state armed forces, but that reality is changing. What's happening around the world today in more and more places is that state armed forces find themselves fighting not other state armed forces, but fourth generation forces, nonstate forces. In a nutshell, Lynn's thesis is that the modern age of warfare began with the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, which he opines gave the state a monopoly on war. From that point on, modern warfare went through three generations, namely first generation warfare the tactics of line and column developed in the era of the smooth boar musket second generation warfare, the tactics of indirect fire and mass movement, developed in the era of the rifled musket, breach loaders, barbed wire, and the machine gun. And third generation warfare, the tactics of nonlinear movement, including maneuver and infiltration, developed in response to the increase in battlefield firepower in World War I.

This, according to Lind and his coauthors, brought us to the late 20th century, when the nation state began to lose its monopoly on war and military combat returned to a decentralized form. In this era, the era of fourth generation warfare, the line between civilian and military become blurred. Armies tend to engage in counterinsurgency operations rather than military battles, and enemies are often motivated by ideology and religion, making psychological operations more important than ever. But some argue we've now entered a new era of warfare, namely fifth generation warfare. There's still much debate about what defines fifth generation warfare, how we know we're engaged in it, or even if it exists at all.

Lind, for one, rejects the concept various scholars have made their own attempts at defining fifth generation warfare. Or Dr. Wasim Ahmad Qureshi, who identifies it as the Battle of Perceptions and Information. Or Chaoyang and Wang Shangsui of the People's Liberation Army, who write of the era of unrestricted warfare in which a relative reduction in military violence has led to an increase in political, economic, and technological violence. If academic debates about the changing nature of warfare are your thing, then there's plenty of reading for you to do on the subject, from the Handbook of Five GW a Fifth Generation of War to a slew of academic articles.

But for the purposes of this presentation, I'm not interested in that debate. In fact, we're going to use a decidedly nonacademic definition of fifth generation warfare from an Al Jazeera article as our starting point. The basic idea behind this term Five GW is that in the modern era, wars are not fought by armies or guerrillas, but in the minds of common citizens. There are two important things to note about this definition. The first is that fifth generation warfare is not waged against either standing armies of nation states or guerrilla insurgents, but against everyday citizens.

The second is that the war is not being fought in a battlefield somewhere, but in the mind. Let's expand the definition somewhat to include the fact that this war is being waged at all levels, not just the mental. The gist of it is this fifth generation warfare is an all out war that is being waged against all of us, by our governments and the international organizations to which they belong. It's being waged against each and every one of us right now. And it is a battle for full spectrum dominance over every single aspect of your life your movements and interactions, your transactions, even your innermost thoughts and feelings and desires.

Governments the world over are working with corporations to leverage technology to control you down to the genomic level, and they will not stop until each and every person who resists them is subdued or eliminated. The most incredible part of all of this is that so few know that the war is even taking place, let alone that they are a combatant in it. The best way to understand this war is to look at some of the ways that it is being waged against us.

Information Warfare stop me if you've heard this before, but this is an infowar, and the powers that shouldn't be are engaged in a war for your mind. Of course you have heard of infowars if you've been in the alternative media space for any length of time, and for good reason. Information warfare is an absolutely essential part of the war on Everyone that defines fifth generation warfare. The most obvious way to understand this is to look at the actual military forces that are engaging in psychological operations against their own citizens. Says here a letter from Nova Scotia government sent out to residents to warn about a pack of wolves on the loose in the province, was forged by Canadian military personnel as part of a propaganda training mission that went off the rails.

The letter told residents to be wary of wolves that had been reintroduced into the area by the provincial and federal governments and warned the animals were now roaming the Annopolis Valley. The letter, which later became public, sparked concerns and questions among residents, but was later branded as fake by the Nova Scotia government, which didn't even know it was the military who was behind the deception. The training also involved using a loudspeaker to generate wolf sounds. The Canadian forces confirmed to this newspaper, guys, let that sink in for a second. They created a fake letter from the government, put it out there saying that there's dangerous wolves, and they set up loudspeakers in the area, projecting out wolf noises.

This isn't just research. This just isn't just a training exercise. They're actively engaging in this psychological operation to scare people using loudspeakers. This is unbelievable. But it's not just out and out military operations by soldiers dressed up in camel fatigues that are part of this fifth generation infowar in the war on everyone.

The establishment uses every means at its disposal to manipulate the public's perception. Take Richard Stengel, the former editor of Time, who bestowed Time's Person of the Year dishonor on you back in 2006, who chaired a Council on Foreign Relations conversation in which he defends the US government's use of propaganda against its own citizens. Basically, every country creates their own narrative. Know, my old job at the State Department was what people used to joke as the chief propaganda job. We haven't talked about propaganda.

Propaganda. I'm not against propaganda. Every country does it, and they have to do it to their own population. And I don't necessarily think it's that awful. Or take Hillen?

Nolton. The PR firm hired by the Kuwaiti government to create the Naira deception in the first Gulf War. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators and left the children to die on the cold floor, who were retained by the who in 2020 to identify celebrity influencers who could be used to amplify the scamdemic messaging. The One World Together at Home event showcased the who's who of top music stars and celebrities who came together over the weekend for a special broadcast of music, comedy, and personal messages, all in gratitude to those around the world on the front lines of the Coronavirus pandemic. So what can we do?

We've got to take care of our healthcare workers and buy them time by taking care of ourselves. The event was led by the World Health Organization and the nonprofit group Global Citizen, or Take, the UK government's scientific pandemic influenza group on behaviors, which outright admits that they use psychological techniques to manipulate the public into fearing the scamdemic, a move that even some of the panel's own members called totalitarian. And no one bats an eyelid. Perhaps the most insidious part of the fifth generation infowar is that it has become so normalized that everyone knows it is happening, but no one thinks of it as warfare. Of course, everything is advertising and propaganda, and of course it's being used to manipulate our behavior.

That's just how the world works, isn't it? But we ignore the real nature of the infowar at our own peril. After all, I've often observed that this is a war for your mind and that the most contested battle space in the world is the space between your ears. You might have thought I meant that metaphorically, but actually, I mean it quite literally. Which brings us to neurological warfare.

If you listen to Dr. James Giordano speak without listening to what he's saying, you get the impression he's merely an articulate, well informed scientist who's passionate about his research. When you do listen to what he's saying, however, or even just look at his PowerPoint slides, like the neurost for NSID slide, you realize that he is Dr. Strangelove. Or if not Dr.

Strangelove himself, then at least Dr. Strangelove's spokesman. But it's not nuclear Armageddon that motivates Jordano. It's what he calls weapons of mass disruption. The various technologies for neurological intervention that the US.

Military and militaries around the world are developing. These include in Jordano's well rehearsed pattern, the drugs, bugs, toxins, and devices that can either enhance or disrupt the cognitive functions of their target, like the high CNS aggregation nanoparticulates that, according to Jordano, clump in the brain or the vasculature and create essentially what looks like a hemorrhagic diathesis. As Sci-Fi as this sounds, he insists that these nanoparticulates and many, many other horrific neurological weapons are already being worked on. The idea here is that I can get something called high CNS aggregation material that is essentially invisible to the naked eye and even to most scanners, because it is so small that it selectively goes through most levels of filter porosity. These are then inhaled either through the nasal mucosa or absorbed through the oral mucosa.

They have high CNS affinity. They clump in the brain or in the vasculature, and they create essentially what looks like a hemorrhagic diathesis. In other words, a hemorrhage predisposition or a clot predisposition in the brain. What I've done is I've created a stroking agent, and it's very, very difficult to gain attribution to do that. I can use that on a variety of levels from the individual to the group.

Highly disruptive. And in fact, this is one of the things that has been entertained and examined to some extent by my colleagues in NATO and to those who are working on the use of neurobiological sciences to create populational disruption. Very, very worried about the potential for these nanoparticulate agents to be CNS aggregating agents to cause neural disruption. And just in case you didn't get the point, you'll notice he illustrates his slide with an image of a human brain in the crosshairs of one of these neurological weapons. There's nothing hard to understand about the picture that's being painted here.

We're at war with an enemy who is literally targeting our brains. But yet again, it isn't just the literal use of neurological weapons by conventional militaries in conventional war settings that we, the largely unwitting combatants of this fifth generation war on everyone, have to worry about. As my listeners already know, avowed technocrat Elon Musk is trying to sell his neuralink brain chip technology to the hipster crowd as a cool and sexy way to upgrade your cognition. Or so the coming AI. Godhead will have mercy on us or something like that.

Anyway, you should totally stick the neuralink in your head at the earliest opportunity. And definitely don't ask any questions about why so many of the Makak monkeys and other test animals that neuralink were using in their brain. Machine interface experiments have dropped dead to anyone not yet a victim of the information warfare operation designed to prepare humanity for the coming transhuman dystopia. All of this sounds insane, but for those who have fallen for the infowars psyop of the enemy, these types of mind altering technologies are exactly as advertised exciting opportunities to upgrade the feeble biological wetware we call our brain. But if you think you can avoid the biological aspect of the fifth generation war by simply avoiding the brain chip, you're out of luck.

You're also going to have to deal with biological warfare.

The biowarfare narrative is understandably back at the forefront of the public consciousness in recent years, not just because of the scamdemic, but also because of the questions being raised about the US backed Ukrainian biolabs and whatever work they may or may not be doing on Russia's doorstep. This picture, for example, comes straight from Army Mill, which was only too happy to brag as recently as last July, that U. S. Soldiers were conducting hands on training and field training exercises with Ukrainian troops in laboratory and field environments that included ensuring the readiness of deployable mobile laboratories. Nothing to see here, folks.

Perhaps the only surprising thing about the article is that they haven't scrubbed it from their website yet. But once again, if we are only thinking of biowarfare in conventional military terms, we neglect the much, much wider operation to manipulate, control and weaponize all aspects of our environment, our food supply and even our genome itself. For the purposes of the ruling oligarchs, this fifth generation biological warfare being waged against us includes the mRNA and DNA and genetically modified adenovirus vector vaccines that have been normalized over the past two years and which, as the miraculously lucky companies that bet it all on this technology, like to brag, is reprogramming the software of life. The genetically modified organisms, both GMO crops and GMO animals that are now being unleashed upon the world in an uncontrolled experiment that puts our health and the very future of the biosphere in jeopardy. The push towards synthetic lab based food that is being funded by the usual eugenicist billionaires and which threatens to sever humanity from the natural abundance of the earth make us dependent on an increasingly shrinking number of companies for our food supply and ultimately to drive us towards a Soylent Green style future.

I'm sure you can fill in the blanks with myriad other examples of the attacks upon the world's air, water and biome that constitute this unconstrained fifth generation biological war being waged against us. When and if you do put the pieces of this puzzle together and seek to warn people en masse that they're under attack, your ability to resist this agenda will be predicated on your ability to use your accumulated resources, your wealth to foster communities of resistance. Don't worry though the enemy has that domain covered too.

Economic Warfare given the events of recent years, even the sleepiest of the sleepy now realize that we are in a period of economic warfare. This war too, has its conventional aspects. On the 2D board, we've seen the NATO empire launch its weapons of financial destruction at Russia. And exactly as predicted, it has resulted in the consolidation of a convenient geopolitical boogeyman bloc and a gigantic loss of faith in the international monetary system itself. And also, as predicted, it has supplied the problem and reaction needed for the technocrats to present their predetermined solution of central bank digital Currencies, or CBDCs.

Just ask Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock. The war will prompt countries to reevaluate their currency dependencies. Even before the war, several governments were looking to play a more active role in digital currencies and define the regulatory frameworks under which they operate. This isn't merely a battle between nation states or even competing power blocks. This is a battle being waged by every authoritarian power structure and every government.

But I repeat myself against their own citizens for control of the most important resource of all of them their wallets. Yes. We're seeing the beginning of a truly world historical moment. The collapse of PAX Americana, the death of the dollar reserve system and the beginning of an entirely new monetary paradigm. The central bank digital currency system of programmable money that will be able to algorithmically control when, how and if you are allowed to transact in the economy at all.

We only have to look to recent events in Canada to understand what this will look like. This perfect control of humanity down to the level of being able to witness and ultimately to allow or disallow any transaction between any individuals at any time, represents the apotheosis of technocracy and one of the key objectives of the fifth generation war itself. As this nightmare comes closer and closer to reality, all seems hopeless. But then again, that's exactly the point.

The real war.

I could go on and on and on and on, but hopefully you get the point by now. There is a world war happening right now. It is a fifth generation war or whatever you want to call it. It is being waged across every domain simultaneously. It's a war for full spectrum dominance of every battlefield and every terrain from the farthest reaches of the globe and beyond to the inner spaces of your body and even to your innermost thoughts.

And it is a war on you. Recognizing this, the task we face seems nearly insurmountable. How are we to fight back in a war that the majority of people don't even recognize as taking place? How do we fight back against an enemy that has spent decades refining its weapons of economic and military and technological and biological control? How do we fight back in a war that is not taking place on two fronts or even three fronts, but in every domain and battlespace simultaneously?

Framed like this, our prospects do appear hopeless. But therein lies the key. Our perception that it is our duty to fight back against the enemy in their war on their battlefield, on their terms of engagement, is itself a narrative frame. And that narrative itself is a weapon that is being wielded against us in the battle for our minds. You'll allow me the space here to quote myself at length because this is a point I've made many times before, perhaps most notably in my conversation on the anatomy of the New World Order that I had with Julian Charles on the Mind Renewed podcast ten years ago.

Well, I'm intrigued by the idea that we've been given false templates to follow in terms of solving our problems or of fighting enemies. And I think part of this false template that we've been provided through so much social conditioning and the media that we consume, et cetera, is this idea that we must find the heart of the organization. We must find the head of this organization, we must somehow kill that person or that group or whatever it is, eliminate that, and everything will magically turn to the better. And I think that that is a false template that we've been given. And one only has to think in broad terms at pretty much every science fiction dystopia you've ever seen.

And in the end, if it turns out positively, it's only because they have managed to decapitate the head of the Beast in whatever way it is. Whether it be The Lord of the Rings or Tron or any of these types of movies or things that you can think of. The idea is you kill the head bad guy and everything turns magically into peaceful utopia. And I think that is fundamentally completely the wrong way to look at it because I don't think that at the end of the day that the particular individuals who may or may not be the ones holding the ultimate ring of power at this particular moment are irreplaceable. On the contrary, there are many, many people who would be so chomping at the bit to get into that position of power should that old guard be swept away for whatever reason.

And I think it has to be something that is a more fundamental revolution not of overthrowing a specific instantiation of this idea, but overthrowing the idea altogether. And that can only come, I think, from the building up of an alternative system to which people want to actually apply themselves rather than attempting to simply have some wage some sort of heroic war that will solve everything once and for all. I think we have to actually just detach ourselves from this system that we've been woven into. And unfortunately, that's probably as difficult to do as that analogy would make it sound. Because we are so woven into a fabric of society that it is difficult to imagine really extrapolating ourselves from all of these processes that rely for so many of our daily needs on these vast, overwhelming corporate infrastructures that tie into these various organizations that themselves pull the strings of various governmental institutions.

It's such a vast and unwieldy system that it can seem quite overwhelming at times. How can a single individual affect this? But I think that we have to look for any and every possible point at which we can at least start to detach ourselves from those systems of control, to start to try to reassert some sort of independence. And that can be an extremely small thing. Like, for example, instead of, I don't know, going out and buying your groceries at the grocery store, perhaps you can go and buy them at a farmer's market or at least some of your groceries you can get at.

A farmer's market or you can grow it yourself in a vegetable garden or something of that sort is a tiny thing on the individual level. But I think it is the only thing that in the long run can lead to the type of society that we want to bring to fruition. I think again, it's the small things like that to which if we start to apply ourselves with diligence and with perseverance that in the long run we'll be able to overthrow this. But unfortunately, as I say, we are on this cusp of this scientific revolution which makes a scientific dictatorship possible. So unfortunately, we don't have necessarily generations of time in which to do this.

So that puts a bit of a time perspective on this. A ticking, I don't want to say time bomb, but you get the idea a certain time limit to the accomplishment of this, which means that we don't have a lot of time to waste in deciding which of these structures we want to give ourselves over to. Either. We continue going into this technological structure that is part of this corporate matrix which involves even such things as buying the next generation of iPhone, which they're already saying is going to have its own fingerprint scanning technology. And all of this corporate, technological, industrial, defense, military, big brother spy grid matrix to which we're signing on every single day of our lives, willingly and knowingly and actually paying our money to buy into or we start creating alternative structures which don't rely on that system.

And it's a choice that we have to make in our lives, I would say more quickly than has been apparent at any other time in human history. My regular viewers will understand what I'm proposing here the creation of a parallel society. We won't achieve this by asking for more scraps from the master's table or by gently complying as we're herded into ever more constrictive technological pens, or by thinking that we can win this war by engaging the enemy in their control, the domain. We can only achieve this by creating our own table, our own economy and our own communities of interest. This will require the long and difficult task of increasing our independence from the authoritarian systems in every domain the information domain, the food domain, the health domain, the monetary domain, the mental domain and every other contested battlespace in this all out fifth generation war.

Easier said than done, of course, but there is no alternative. Some will say, but won't they come after that parallel society? As if that's a rebuttal to what I've laid out here. The point is that you are already the target of the enemy in a war that most people but dimly understand is happening. Yes, the enemy will come after you, but they are already dominating you in more ways than any one person can fully understand.

That doesn't stop just because you comply with their demands or take part in their system. We must stop playing their game. We must stop fighting their war. We must stop ceding our power, our authority, our time, our attention, our energy and our resources to engaging the enemy in their terms on their battlefield. We must create our own parallel society on our own terms.

And so we rediscover an old piece of wisdom. To paraphrase fifth generation warfare is a strange game. The only winning move is not to play. War is over. If we want it your Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare transcript and Sources corbettreport.com slash Fifth Gen hello, this is James Corbett of the Corbett Report, the creator of your Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare, the report that you've just been viewing.

And if you are new to the Corbett Report, I wanted to take a moment to explain that what you just witnessed was the visualization of an editorial that I wrote last year for the Corbett Report subscriber newsletter. Now, if you're unfamiliar with this every weekend or every weekend except the first weekend of the month, I put out a subscriber newsletter that includes a subscriber editorial along the lines of the one that you just witnessed and that is available 100%, completely, totally, freely available to the public at corbettreport Substack.com, where you can find that weekly editorial being published completely for free. You can sign up for the free email list so that you will get the email when it goes out. But you don't have to sign up, you can just read it right there on Corporetreport substack.com. But on Corbetreport.com, my actual website, you can get the full subscriber newsletter, which includes not just the editorial like your guide to Fifth generation Warfare, but also recommended reading and viewing and listening, as well as a subscriber discount code for DVDs and other purchases at the New World next week store.

That's a lot of information to take in at once, but I just want people to know that what you have just witnessed was actually written several months ago. And if you would like to find out about what I am writing as I am writing it, you should consider visiting Corbetreport.com, following the RSS feeds there and or signing up for my substac so you can keep up to date with the information as it comes out. And if you are already familiar with the corporate report and you do appreciate this work, then let me reiterate for not the first time that this is completely dependent on your support. I am a reader supported publication, so if you would like this work to continue in the future, I do require your monetary support. You can sign up to become a member of the Corbett Report website, which gives you login access to log in and leave comments on the site as well as to access that subscriber newsletter in its entirety that I was talking about earlier.

If you would like more information about that, you can find it@corbertreport.com members, thank you sincerely for your time and attention. Thank you in advance for helping to spread the word about this incredibly important information and I look forward to talking to you again in the near future. Bye.

Kid Wars – 09-07-2023

Kid Wars - 09-07-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The document discusses the emergence of a war into public consciousness, comparing its effects on daily life to the wearing of masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. The author speculates that a significant portion of the population will become aware of this secret war and its weapons. This awareness will influence the upcoming elections, with a potential third of the population and many young adults being cognizant of the war. The author mentions a potential increase in weapon and ammunition purchases, leading to media speculation about an armed insurrection against the Biden regime. The author also touches on the impact of the war on schools, with students wanting to discuss the ongoing war and teachers being unprepared or unwilling to address it. The document further delves into the potential reactions of the public, including hoarding and purchasing gold, silver, and weapons. The author predicts that the mainstream media will struggle to spin the narrative, especially as more people become aware of the war. The upcoming election in 2024 will be heavily influenced by this war consciousness, with the MAGA movement playing a significant role. The author also hints at the possibility of discussions about extraterrestrial life and its implications for humanity.

#War #PublicConsciousness #Elections2024 #MAGA #BidenRegime #Weapons #Schools #Media #Propaganda #Extraterrestrial #SecretWar #Awareness #Hoarding #Gold #Silver #MainstreamMedia #Novelty #SpaceAliens #Officialdom #ElectionCycle #Hyperbole #Propaganda #EconomicIssues #InformationOverload #Relationship

Kid Wars - 09-07-2023

Hello humans. Hello humans. Still Thursday, it's about after eleven something heading outward bound. Got all my chores done. Have to go in and do shopping once a week.

Royal pain.

Anyway, so had been talking about the emergence of the war into public consciousness. This is one of those things that's going to seriously change the dynamic, your interpersonal dynamic with people interacting on a daily basis because you'll start seeing people that are reacting to the war. Maybe they're going to wear blue tarps or something, just like people wore masks. Blue tarps would actually work against getting incinerated by the laser directed energy weapons, though, unlike mask, which didn't do anything at all except put carcinogens in your lungs, right? So anyway, this war stuff is going to be participating in the election next year, and it's going to cause, let's just say, about a third of the and I don't know that it's actually 30%.

It might be 40% or 20. I'm just making a guess here, but a sizable significant portion of the population is going to be cognizant of being in war having been in war having it be a secret war, having there be secret war weapons being used against them, all of this kind of stuff. And they'll be focusing on the Khazarian mafia as their enemy that is causing all the problems and is attacking them. Right. And they'll start referring to Lahaina as another Pearl Harbor in a serious way.

And no one or this whole third of the population, and we're talking the adult population, and then there might be another 50 or 60% of the kids. Okay, so I'm rather shocked and I guess I'm going to have to curtail some of my fucking language here, but I didn't realize I had that many children, or not children, but young adults listening to me, right? Young adults not yet at their majority, so under 20 ones. I just assumed it was a bunch of old farts like myself. But in any event, I get too many emails for that to be the case.

And I'm helping with too many young people with various different health issues who happen to write me in any event, so I do have a youngish audience and so I guess I'm going to have to tone down some of my fucking language. Yeah. Anyway, so say we've got a third of the population that is cognizant of the war and like maybe a third of all the kids. So the kids are going to cause their own issues in schools, all right? And they're going to cause issues to the point that the data is saying that sometime.

And so this is at the far edge of what I consider to be reliable. So probably it's more towards the end of November and first part of December in there. But we should see episodes where we have school officialdom reacting to what I want to say, not riots, insurrection, revolution within their schools. In other words, there will be kids that will go and take like I don't know what they teach them anymore. They don't teach them anything real, but they'll be in classes and they'll want to discuss the ongoing war and their teachers are going to freak out.

Okay? These teachers are abysmally ignorant in the main. All of the young teachers, especially all those that I've met, are too cowardly to be antifa, but they want to be right. And so they're on that tranny FAW train and they want to be fierce, radical leftists, but basically they're just too cowardly and they're working their way through someone else, right, the children and stuff anyway. So there's going to be contention at a serious way in areas like large school districts, not ubiquitous across the country, not initially, but as we get into the last month of this year, in January of next, we're going to see that these points of contention are going to start growing.

And so there will be some level on the news or somewhere the data is suggesting that there will be some level of acknowledgment by people that are tangentially connected to officialdom that this is ongoing. So you may see news stories about it on your local press. You'll certainly see all kinds of stuff on Twitter, TikTok, all of this kind of stuff. I actually expect the online portion of the rebellion to be breaking out earlier, maybe first part of November, maybe mid October or something, and to start impacting on the social media and then it's just going to grow. It's going to become its own little movement or phenomena, like a social level phenomena.

And it's going to go through the school systems and this idea is going to capture a lot of people, a lot of these kids, right, a lot of these very energetic teenagers are going to start turning their minds around because they will become convinced, as I am, that we have a war going, right? And that they are actively being targeted and they're actively victims of this war. And so this dynamic is going to change the evening dinner conversations. It's going to change the interaction with their parents because you know how kids are. They're going to be ragging on their parents to start doing things to protect themselves against the upcoming parts of the war.

You're going to see these kids, and to some extent the adults that are involved in this on their own, independent will also take a lot of these actions. But they'll start doing things like just in the run up to World War II. So people will start hoarding, they'll start buying extra stuff. You'll see that there will be a run on weapons and ammunition in a way that's never been seen before. And that's going to cause the mainstream media, the lying whore fuckers to come out and say it's because everybody's gearing up for 2024 and armed insurrection against the legitimately elected nice and effective controllers of our society, the Biden regime, right?

So they'll say everybody's buying all these weapons and stuff because they anticipate going to war with the Biden regime. It's going to freak them out, okay? So you'll see people that will legitimately be freaked out within officialdom because they won't know, all they'll know is the statistics. And so maybe it will be a doubling, I don't know. But there will be a large number of people that will be trying to get weapons and they'll be trying to get ammo and stuff because their minds will have changed and they'll realize that they have been attacked.

They've been attacked since at least 2001, I think it's been going for 6000 years. But that's neither here nor there. So they know they've been attacked, they know they've been attacked since 2001. They know the attacks are escalating and they know that the weapons are secret and silent and this is going to just freak them out. And so their response is going to be to have something to protect themselves.

You can't shoot a particle beam weapon that's coming down on you, but people will nonetheless feel better because they will have weapons. The Biden regime, people are going to just shit their pants over all of this. There's going to be other aspects of this that's also going to freak them out. So the knowledge of the war is going to start affecting people relative, especially the kids, like I've been saying, all these teenagers and it's going to affect things like the banking, okay? So because we're at war, people are going to start taking cash out.

They'll start buying gold, they'll start buying silver. As I say, they'll start buying weapons, they'll put their excess money into food. And people will stop saving dollars because they will understand more of the situation, and they know the dollar is dying, but also because they're pretty sure that the Biden regime is at war and is losing. Okay? And so that's going to cause some serious issues in terms of the social order to the point that you will see stories about it from officialdom's viewpoint, from the mainstream news viewpoint.

And so you'll see the actual events but of course it'll be colored by their interpretation of it all, which of course is 100% wrong.

They'll be trying to sell you their version anyway. So there will be reactions to the kids. We may see some level of contention in schools that will cause a real problem for the school administrator kind of guys because they're going to be put into a bind, okay? So they'll have teachers coming and telling them, my students are rebelling, they're actively involved in an insurrection, they're against the tranny FAW, all of our stuff is failing and we need to do something, Mr. School Administrator.

And so the teachers will be freaking out. The kids won't necessarily be freaking out about the school administrators or the teachers or any of that because they're wising up, right? They're realizing that the teachers are propagandists, don't teach them anything, yada yada, yada. But because they have this different paradigm, it's going to be a real collision of paradigms, right? And that real collision of paradigms is going to be reflected to you in terms of the mainstream media trying to put a spin on it for their own purposes.

It won't work. Too many people are waking up, too many people are wise to all this shit, but nonetheless, they will try. They have to. They have no other option. Their minds are extremely limited and they're just functionaries.

And so when shit happens, they function and they just function within the parameters of what they've been given.

So as we enter into 2024, which is the election year, you're going to see it's going to be an election year like 1942 kind of thing, right, where the war will be a major part of the election. Now, you're going to have an interesting dichotomy here.

I don't know that the mega people, okay, so the mega people will be aware of the war. It will be spreading through them by the many adults that are savvy to this, but also by their kids who are becoming savvy to this and are spreading it much faster, right? And so the mega people will become aware of the war. But I don't know if the officialdom within the mega party, like the Republicans and this kind of thing are going to openly acknowledge the ongoing aspect of the war during the election. I think maybe so up close to the actual days of voting, we'll have to deal with that aspect of it.

I have no level of indication within the data that Trump's going to come on out and start talking about the war or anything like that, but it will be part of the overall election cycle in 2024, at least from the ground up, so to speak, right? Because the kids will be talking about to their parents who are going to be going to vote and the parents are going to say, what the fuck, kid? And so the kid will have to convince them about all of this stuff. And because it is factual, the kids will have a relatively solid base from which to argue their position and it's going to drive parents nuts, going to drive them absolutely crazy because they don't need to think about this, but they do need to think about it because it's factual and it's ongoing, et cetera, et cetera. So the dynamic of our election cycle is going to be changed as a result of this.

Now I'm expecting as an aspect of the hyper novelty that we're going to up level the whole discussion about an interaction potentially with space aliens. So it's going to be hugely spread out, so to speak, in the sense that only maybe a third of the people in the electorate are going to be talking about the war in an active fashion. You'll find many people that will be dismissive of it, especially those people that are shading towards officialdom. But in all of this you're going to find that, uh oh, you got a lot of the Democrats that are also seeing this, right? You got a lot of the non functionary, just the party members within the Democratic Party that are know, biden's full of shit, blah, blah, blah, he's corrupt, blah, blah blah.

And they're seeing all of this. And so their response to people saying there's a war going on is going to be at least open to the possibility, right? They're not going to instantly shut you down. And so that dynamic is going to change other aspects of the election cycle. And you'll actually at some point, and I suspect it'll be maybe June or July of next year, depending on how bizarre things get in April and May.

And so that's the emergence of hypernovelty. We may start seeing reactions to hypernovelty. But in any event, so June or July of next year, maybe we'll see the mainstream media start reporting on MAGA infiltration into the Democrat Party, that the rank and file are being mind controlled or something. They have to come up with some kind of a theory as to why the Democrats are not participating and are actually going over to the MAGA site.

It's not going to fly, it's going to be a bunch of lies and so on. I actually don't know how long past April 3. We're going to have to deal with mainstream media. April 3 is going to be really interesting, that period of time, not necessarily that day, but we will get to the point there where we have a hyper novelty breakout and that's going to fracture conversations. So you'll see it on Twitter, you'll see it TikTok telegram anywhere.

People are putting stuff down and recording their impressions, emotions and so on. You're going to see this busting out in April. They're just going to basically all be saying, what the fuck, things are getting so weird, blah, blah, blah, right? It's just too much new stuff for them to cope with that novelty aspect of what's coming up next year. Hyper novelty extends much beyond a particular point on April 3.

I just picked that as a point where release language dominates building tension language so completely that building tension language for all intents and purposes is going to be completely subsumed. It's just going to basically disappear. So it's going to be a lot of people in the what the fuck, what am I seeing kind of a state, right? And that's just going to go on and on and on for months and months and months as people get to this point, experience the novelty and then try and cope with it. So I'm of the opinion that a lot of people that as they experience the novelty are going to withdraw from it, right?

They'll try and do something and not think about it, not get involved, and they'll retreat from public life and not do as much online and this kind of thing. There'll be the other guys that are just going to go totally freaking crazy over it, don't know what to do. And they'll just be online constantly trying to get it out of their system, trying to get the emotion to release so that they won't be pent up and pressurized by what's going through their minds. Right.

As I say, it's going to be a very weird election year. And at some point, sometime after the hyper novelty aspect of it, I expect that we will have to up level our understanding of other life in the universe at a pretty much species level. It'll have to be at some point the officialdom, new officialdom or the current officialdom, which will be disappearing. But at some point officialdom is going to have to participate in this discussion of the space aliens and things. It's going to cause all kinds of consternation.

You're going to have all kinds of religious people freaking out. You're going to have all kinds of official people freaking out.

I don't think the populace is going to freak out that much because there isn't a whole lot they can do. But there will be some response in the sense of hoarding and maybe I need to get an extra gallon of milk because the space aliens might invade before the next time I go shopping, right, that sort of thing. And then it's going to get a little bit weird once we have officialdom discussing these kind of things and discussing the fact that the moon is inhabited. Now, do I expect that sometime next year the Biden regime is going to come on out and say, hey guys, there's space aliens on the moon and here's what we know about them? No, it's not going to come out that way.

It's going to have to be pulled out of these fuckers'teeth by their teeth, right? We're going to have to be extracting this information from them. That is why, in my opinion, it'll be new officialdom that will be responding to the circumstances, not the Biden regime. So I don't expect the Bidenistas to hold past April 3 much, right. They may have a nominal presence, but they're not really going to be a power in any way, shape or form after that point in my understanding of what I'm looking at in the data.

And I do expect that whatever our new official Dom is will, because it will be strategically and tactically available and important to them. They will get into discussion here of space aliens, how much and how deeply we go into space aliens fucking with humans, I don't know, right? That'll take maybe a number of years before we even really begin investigating that. And then we'll know we're in there because there'll be dozens and dozens of movies about it all, all different kinds of flavors of it that have yet to been made. So I'm expecting that our economic issues are going to really pick up latter half of 2024 after new officialdom starts coming in and then really start escalating as we go into 2025 and beyond.

At some point though, we're going to have a very, maybe it's December, maybe we're going to have a very depressing December, because we'll have to have some level of acknowledgment of the war with the space aliens or the war on planet Earth. We don't know who's attacking us, it's probably humans, but space aliens are in there somewhere in the mixed. And so we'll be discussing all of this. But when the news about the war comes out relative to officialdom, that also changes everything within the relationship of the populace to officialdom. So as I say, it's going to be a strange year, a very unusual election cycle, and the propaganda coming out during this election cycle is going to just be all over the place.

We'll have extremes in information overload, we'll have extremes in the hyperbole being used by politicians, mainly on the biden side. The mega people are going to be a lot more conservative and factual and they won't need to have the histrionics because they can just point at the biden people having the histrionics.

So maybe it's going to be December of 2024, okay, maybe it's going to be January, February, March of 2025. In that four month block in there is my estimate, my estimation, my pick for a time in which we'll be dealing with the aliens on the moon, the space aliens on the moon, and we'll be dealing with that knowledge inside the human social order. I don't know that there will be any kind of contact with these space aliens. I don't know if we'll be exchanging ambassadors. I just know that here on Earth, humans will become aware of them, talking about them and preparing anyway for that interaction with them.

And it's going to be, again, a social order changing kind of a thing. So we'll have some level of acknowledgment of space aliens this coming April. It'll emerge into our social order here over the first part of next year, the first few months of next year, and then about a year later, it's going to go from a generalized oh, yeah, there's space aliens out. And about and oh, yeah. Space aliens have been here on Earth to very specific discussions about a specific group of space aliens that are on the moon.

And so that's going to cause all kinds of stuff. You're going to have all dozens and dozens and dozens of people getting telescopes and putting out videos about what they're seeing up there. You'll have analyses about it. It's going to be quite the thing, a big lunar industry, if you will, getting into all of the space aliens. There.

The information about them. And speculation, lots and lots and lots of speculation. So probably for the next three years or four years, the majority of information will be tinged with some level of speculation, much of it not valid, right? And so there'll be all kinds of things we think we learn next year that the year after will turn out to be wrong, and we'll just have to start over and learning whatever it was those were masking. So we got to humans have a lot of work ahead of us, right?

We got to put our affairs in order down here. We got to deal with the Communists, we got to deal with the Tranny file, we got to deal with the corruption, we got to deal with the Kazarian mafia, all this kind of stuff. And in the midst of all of that, we have also to deal with our own sense, our own perspective of humanity and space aliens. So this is going to impact all the religions. It's going to be very impacting and probably take 40 years, maybe almost two complete generations for us to work out even 60% to 70% of all the issues that show up.

So bear in mind that this is not just the Jews, right? Not just the Christians, both of whom have their religion based on space aliens. It's also the ancient Greeks, it's the Hindus, everybody that has a religion absent Buddhism, okay? And that kind of thing. There's some religions that are not really that tainted by space aliens, but even Buddhism has tons of stuff in it that they took from Hinduism that's all about the space aliens, and it's just not acknowledged that they're dealing with space aliens.

So even Buddhism is going to have to go through this cleaning house process to decide what is inherently human and what has been pimped up or pumped up for humans to glom onto by the space aliens. And that aspect of, as I say, of overwoing a specific subject area, which is religion, and getting at the facts of the matter and then developing truth from those facts that's a 40 year proposition could take us a long, long time. Obviously, people are resistant. We're going to have a lot of people that won't go along with it. They'll just have to die off in order to remove that part of the pressure holding that Yahweh was a good guy or Yahweh is a god or any of this kind of shit, right?

So those attitudes reflecting untruths, reflecting space aliens that have been fucking with us, it will take us a couple of generations to shed the aspects that control our minds from these memes. And we'll be better off 40 years from now in that. So we'll see how it goes. It's not going to be pleasant for the people that are involved with it, right? You, for instance, probably will see a large number of people just simply leaving the Catholic Church and not just laypeople, not just the adherents, but also those that are in the church itself, the nuns and the priests and all of that.

You'll see a lot of them just say, well, okay, it's a fucking space alien, I'm out of here. You're going to see the same thing with the rabbinical schools. You'll see a lot of people just abandon the idea of becoming rabbi or going into any of that at all. There's going to be a big war, a big internal war within the Jewish population as they come to terms with the Elohim and the Khazarian mafia and what has been put on Jews as a result of both. And it's going to be in the midst of all of us having all of our other issues about the election cycle, the war popping up, the kids subverting their adult parents and red pilling their parents as to the nature of the war that's going on and this kind of thing.

So there will be the data sets I have that have been so I ran the same routines three times just because the first time it made no sense to me. And then we had the attack on Lahaina. And so oh yeah, it did make sense. Okay. And then I reran it just to make sure that I had everything.

And then I reran it again because it was questionable. I had a couple of items that gave me some concern and then I reran it again, had them come out exact or not the exactly same way, but in reinforcing. So I'm less trepidacious about the discussion of those. But in any event though, so as the kids red pill their parents and as the schools start freaking out about this red pill movement that's sweeping through their schools, which will have demonstrable results so you may have kids en masse walk out of like communist indoctrination class. You may have kids in mass pulling sit ins or who knows what.

They're going to be very creative and they're expressing their disapproval of what's going on. But in any event, that will cause the stuff to erupt out into the mainstream and we'll see the effects on it as it pushes on our social order. And the red pill, the school movement is going to be so unexpected, so shocking to the leftist teachers and the principals and all of the socialists, the communists in there, that they will not be able to stop themselves from reacting in the worst possible ways. So these guys have a view that they are normal, that their view of reality is the solid normal view of reality, that you could be a man in one day and then not a man, right? And so they don't recognize the mental illness.

They don't recognize trannies as being munchausens. They don't recognize any of this. And so they have this idea that they are mainstream because media supports that. And it's going to be a real shock to them to have the generalized revolution go through the school system, isolating them from the people they're intending to propagandize, and thereafter they will be at ODS with the people that they are supposed to be propagandizing. And this will create lots and lots and lots of contention.

And in my opinion, what I'm seeing is that sometime after April, April 3, sometime in there, we should reach a point where you'll have large school systems effectively shut down. Okay? I don't know if it'll be teachers that go on strike because they can't deal with the unruly students. I don't know if it'll be the students that go on strike. So therefore the schools just basically collapse because they don't have the attendance and therefore can't get the money.

All it takes is to go 34 days is my understanding. And if you go 34 days with 40% attendance or less, that school will effectively collapse because they won't be able to bring back the income stream from the Feds because they won't have had the bodies in the seats. It's this weird, complicated thing. It was explained to me about how the funding is done, and I grasp that there are metrics within the funding system that place the school administrators in a very tenuous position if anything falls outside of their realm of normalcy. So if they don't have normal attendance and it falls below a certain level, they're truly fucked, especially if it holds at any level.

Even a couple of days really screw them over. But if you start going weeks, they cannot recover. They just won't ever have the money to make their pre obligated payments. It gets a little complicated. But in any event, though, so I expect that that will be one of the offshoots of this, is that as the kids rebel and we have this thing sweeping through the nation, it'll be first here in this school district, and then it'll be another school district over here in the other part of the country.

And then knowing how kids are, as soon as they start seeing this shit in the news and start seeing it on TikTok and telegram and all that, fuck, hey, it's in their school too. So it'll spread very rapidly once it reaches a certain threshold. And this, as I say, this is just going to have school administrators and teachers shitting in the hallways, right, and shitting in their pants, and they're just going to be fucking freaking about this, and rightly so, because once it starts, they have lost. It's just a matter of grinding them down. So as the red pill movement grows through the populace and it starts being manifest in news, all different kinds of news, we're going to see resignations, this principal that assistant principal, this administrative staff, and so on.

Now, bear in mind, I've been told that 240%, okay, so 240% of teacher salaries is required at a bare minimum for most school administrative staffs. So. In other words, they're paying two and a half times more for non teachers than they do for the teaching staff, and they're obviously not teaching anyway. And the kids are going to resent this and this whole thing is basically going to collapse. And so there's going to be like an unemployment wave that results from this next year.

So it'll be into fall of next year as the people resign, as schools shut down, as they don't get the funding, that all this shit starts falling apart. And then that's an aspect of our social order changing. We're going through a cultural revolution. Not the organized one that the communists wanted, but the counterinsurgency revolution on our way towards getting ready to interact with space aliens. Now, the space aliens and the moon.

It's a complicated situation, right? Because the guys that are there now may not be the guys that built the moon and moved it into place. That has yet to be determined, and that's something that we need to determine and I think we need to do it as soon as possible, right? We can be easily lied to about this, so we're going to have to really be solid and investigate and think solidly about what we're told relative to who built the moon. And if the people that are there now are the ones that actually did the building of it, as I say, I do not think so.

I think that these guys that are there now are late arrivals and came in and took over a facility. Whether the other guys are there or not, I don't know. But there's a whole lot of shit that we've got to determine factually and in a very hard way before we get ourselves into a real world of hurt interacting with these other beings. But we'll get into it. Fortunately for us, as this war comes out and as the revolution, the red pilling of the kids and all of this kind of stuff continues, as that escalates, we will find that officialdom starts changing.

And I actually have stuff in the data that suggests that some of your favorite woo woo guys will be contacted by officialdom for what services we might be able to render to that officialdom in regard to the space aliens and the war and stuff. So it's going to be kind of weird. Anyway, guys, I got stuff to do. Tons and tons of stuff. Have another interview tomorrow.

I'll pimp out the interviews and their sites as soon as I know them. Anyway, got to go. Bye.

Ben Shapiro WEF WFA GARM – 08-18-2023

Ben Shapiro WEF WFA GARM - 08-18-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

The text outlines how a group of global elites, including the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), control media and advertising. Through the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (Garm), these entities enforce a universal framework, influencing the content that reaches consumers. Big corporations, tech companies, and even some governments are part of this alliance, creating guidelines that go beyond legal bounds. It also discusses NewsGuard's biased rating of news sites and its influence on advertising. The example of Genucel illustrates how this framework impacts advertising rates and content production, emphasizing a broader concern about censorship and narrative control.

The text criticizes NewsGuard, WEF, WFA, and Garm for enforcing brand safety standards that align with their subjective views. It details how these entities influence content and demonetize creators who contradict accepted narratives. Examples include restrictions against statements that challenge gender norms or question COVID-19 vaccines. The text also highlights how large advertisers promote certain cultural ideals deemed "brand safe" through their advertising strategies with companies like Procter and Gamble, Lego, and Gillette. The author emphasizes the risk of these global powers limiting diversity in thought and narrative, thereby shaping culture and suppressing information they disagree with.

#Advertising #Bias #BrandSafety #Censorship #ContentControl #CorporateInfluence #CultureShaping #FreeSpeech #Garm #GlobalPowers #Guidelines #MediaControl #Monetization #NarrativeControl #NewsGuard #SubjectiveStandards #WEF #WFA #WorldEconomicForum #WorldFederationOfAdvertisers

Ben Shapiro WEF WFA GARM - 08-18-2023

There's a group of people who control what you are allowed to see the news you read, the videos, you watch, the posts you engage with. You haven't heard of them, you don't know their names, but they determine through methods both direct and indirect, whether you are allowed to be exposed to particular messages. Their decisions can bankrupt companies, silence voice is, and fundamentally shift cultural norms. Who are these people, and how do they do this? Well, at the top level, you have a network of global elites that has created a universal framework full of guidelines and ratings designed to enforce approved narratives and punish disapproved ones.

It sounds like a conspiracy theory, except it isn't a secret, and we're not guessing.

First, you have the World Economic Forum, WEF and their platform for shaping the future of media, entertainment, and culture. Second, you have the World Federation of Advertisers WFA, who represent megacorporations that control 90% of global advertising dollars. WFA members are a Who's Who of global business and include some of our recent Wokified favorites like Bud Light's parent company AB, InBev Hershey, Procter and Gamble, Lego and Disney. There is barely a billionaire, Fortune 500 CEO, heavyweight philanthropist, government, or woke nonprofit that isn't associated with the WEF or the WFA. In 2019, the WFA established the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, or Garm.

Within months, the WEF adopted Garm as part of its platform for shaping the future of media, entertainment, and culture. Garm is a cross industry alliance that brings these megacorporations, the advertisers, together with big tech companies like Metta, who owns Facebook and Instagram, google owned YouTube, the CCP's, TikTok, and even Snapchat and Pinterest. This unholy alliance created something they call the brand Safety Floor and suitability framework. Think of brand safety as a dog whistle for censorship. They say it themselves.

The brand safety floor means, quote, content not appropriate for any advertising support. In other words, if you publish content that violates these guidelines, you will be blacklisted from 90% of the advertising revenue in the marketplace. So what have these global elites decided to put in their censorship framework? It started with things we can almost universally agree on, like preventing the distribution of child pornography or the advocacy of graphic terrorist activity. But they don't draw the line at what is objectively criminal, abusive, or dangerous.

They continue expanding the guidelines to include far more subjective parameters. For example, the framework lists subjective terms like hate speech as a problem. It says that anything surrounding transgenderism that they decide is dehumanizing. Or discussing what they deem to be a debated social issue in an insensitive way is off limits. The framework is deliberately vague, allowing those in control to pick and choose how they enforce it and against whom.

So how exactly do the approved narratives set by these global entities get enforced all the way down to the daily content you consume, including, maybe, this video? Well, here's how we'll start with NewsGuard. NewsGuard is an organization that formulates ratings for American media. They rank news sites on a zero to 100 scale based on nine supposedly apolitical criteria. These criteria are anything but apolitical.

They often align with left wing positions. During the height of COVID NewsGuard, falsely labeled and downgraded 21 news sites, only well after the fact, admitting that they either mischaracterized the site's claims about the lab leak theory, referring to the lab leak theory as a conspiracy. Theory or wrongly grouped together unproven claims about the lab leak with the separate false claim that the COVID-19 virus was manmade without explaining that one claim was unsubstantiated and the other was false. NewsGuard apologizes for these errors. They said they have made the appropriate correction on each of the 21 labels.

And when you compare their ratings of left leaning news organizations to right leaning news organizations, you see the same bias appear. The Media Research Center, a free speech nonprofit, studied NewsGuard's ratings. Here are the average ratings afforded to left and left leaning outlets versus those on the right. The study found glaring examples of bias by NewsGuard. The left's BuzzFeed managed a 100 out of 100 perfect score despite its reporting on the Steele dossier and alleging collusion between Trump and Russia.

The study found that the Global Times, a Chinese propaganda government outlet, scored a 39.5. That is 27 points higher than the US. Based conservative outlet, the Federalists. Despite a scandal at USA Today revealing the publication of multiple fabricated sources in their stories and their own fact checking operation, misleading readers on the history of the Democratic Party and the KKK, USA Today maintained the 100 out of 100 rating by NewsGuard. NewsGuard is a trusted partner to Garm.

They help ensure that ad buyers and users looking for news can be in safe and suitable places. Now, I'm going to give you a practical example of what this means for this show. For example, if I didn't ad on this show, I would have to do it with a company that doesn't make ad buying decisions according to Garm standards. A company not associated with Garm or NewsGuard that we love doing business with is a company called Genucel. You've heard about genusell on my daily show?

Genuceell has great products. Like their dark spot. Corrector. See, we sell our ad space based on a certain number of projected views. But unfortunately, due to Garm and NewsGuard, we now sell them at a reduced rate.

As this is the very first episode of fact, we're betting we've got our projected view count right for the sake of deals with future advertisers. But either way, we're thankful to be working with Genucell, a company using cutting edge ingredients in products like their Ultra Retinal Moisturizer with a retinol alternative for safe use in the sun. If you go to Genucell.com slash Ben right now, you can get your Dark Spot Corrector and Ultra Retinal Moisturizer in the Genucell most popular package. That's genucell.com slash Bengenuicell.com. Slash Ben.

Go check them out right now. NewsGuard is also working with others to use AI technology to enforce brand safety standards at scale by identifying scalable, hoaxes and misinformation in order to streamline blanket removal. This means that the news you read, news that is supposed to be fair and objective, or at least diverse, must adhere to Gar, the WEF, the WFA, and their subjective and biased standards in order to be deemed monetizable. If you think this is only something big news corporations have to contend with, think again. Even the content you consume from independent content creators on social media platforms like the one on which you're watching this video, is subject to these globalist powers that be.

So, for example, my friend Matt Walsh, he was demonetized on YouTube. Why? Well, because he says that men are not women. The same was true on TikTok, another Garm member, where Daily Wire hosts are routinely hit with content strikes in various bands for saying things like men are not women. Meanwhile, Dylan Mulvaney shoots up the TikTok algorithms by insulting women, saying, day one of being a girl and I've already cried three times already.

Or for example, if you question the accepted wisdom on COVID. So for example, let's say you say that the vaccine's not great for kids, no evidence kids need them. Kids aren't dying from COVID If you say any of those things, Garm WEF, WFA, they will crack down on you with alacrity. In addition to looking at how companies and creators are punished for violating these standards, it's also important to look at what is considered brand safe. In other words, what narratives are 90% of advertising revenue dollars working to advance.

So, for example, advertisers like Procter and Gamble who advertise with Mulvaney consider Mulvaney safe, as opposed to the Daily Wire, which is not considered brand safe and thus would never be supported by the same advertiser. Brand safety regulations inform culture. In some ways, they actually fund culture, like Garm member Bud Light sending a personalized girlhood beer can to Dylan Mulvaney or Gar member Lego declaring gender is non binary and making trans themed Lego designs. Or Gar member Hershey's using a male and a women's chocolate ad. Or gar member p g's.

Razor brand Gillette, which pushed toxic masculinity narratives and taught dads how to shave their daughter's beards. These are all endeavors deemed to be brand safe for companies to engage in and not risk being either deprived of others advertising dollars or having their advertising dollars turned away. By contrast, Jeremy's Razors not a brand safe partner. Bud Light isn't going to be sending a flannel shirt to Matt Walsh. Matt is not brand safe.

Abigail Schreier can't advertise her book on Amazon. It contains objectionable content about sexual orientation, but Amazon will allow paid ads for things like chess binders and Pro trans books. So what does all this mean? Why should you care? Well, like any other business.

The news media. We have to be able to make money by producing the news. Fact checkers are now incentivizing media outlets to comply with the Wefgarm narratives by determining what is and what is not monetizable. The WEF garm, the WFA, they're all actively working with social media companies to censor what they consider to be misinformation, which very often is just good information with which they disagree. Finally, the WEF, the WFA, Garm, they're all aggressively pouring billions of dollars a year into news and content that drives their preferred narrative narratives that are often counterfactual at best and harmful at worst.

When you look at the news, you need to feel as though you're getting all the information. And even if one source isn't giving you all the information, you can check another source. And all those sources together will give you a broad view of the world. But the World Economic Forum, the World Federation of Advertisers, and the Global Alliance for Responsible Media, they don't want you to have a full view of the news. They want you to see what they want you to see.

And they will work to prevent anyone from disseminating information they don't pre approve. They are determining what you see, what you hear, what you watch. And that's dangerous.

Episode Summary:

The author recounts their experiences with data processes and how over time, the accuracy of their predictions changed. They recall accurately predicting an earthquake, but faced challenges discerning between two major events in the same year. They also mention the influence of external factors like censorship, controlled language environments, and the WEF's manipulation of language. They suggest the WEF's activities led to inaccuracies in their data, especially concerning earth changes. The author also hints at the impact of these changes on psychics' predictions.

The author acknowledges missing signs of the Khazarians' and the World Economic Forum (WEF)'s long-term plans to influence global perceptions, especially regarding climate science. They reflect on how the orchestrated misinformation impacted their data-driven predictions. They discuss the engineered emotional reactions and perceptions in society and dispute various predictions, like Planet X. The author indicates a struggle with discerning genuine data from manipulated narratives and realizes their initial analyses were affected. They close, alluding to more insights gained from the WEF's language but need to tend to greenhouse duties.

#DataProcess #EarthquakePrediction #Censorship #ControlledLanguage #WEF #EarthChanges #Predictions #Accuracy #Khazarians #WEF #ClimateScience #Misinformation #Predictions #DataManipulation #WorldEconomicForum #EngineeredPerceptions #PlanetX #MunchausensByProxy #BabyPlanetEarth

Episode Summary:

The author expresses skepticism about Einstein's concepts, specifically around time being a dimension. They argue that consciousness precedes physical matter and that contemporary understanding of quantum mechanics is flawed. They've conducted experiments based on Nicola Kozyrev's work and criticize Eric Weinstein's "geometric unity model", implying it doesn't reconcile Einstein's and quantum mechanics ideas. They mention Kozyrev's imprisonment for counterrevolutionary ideas, emphasizing his significant contributions after being released early from his sentence.

Nikola KoziRev, stepping away from conventional quantum mechanics, researched and documented the active qualities of time. His experiments showcased that objects, when subjected to specific conditions like shaking, changed in weight without altering mass. This was believed to be due to the object's interaction with the "pulse of the universe" and time's inherent qualities. Other experiments with mercury emphasized its potential significance in time research. Contrary to popular belief, Kozyrev and the author argue against the possibility of corporeal time travel, emphasizing the need for a fresh ontological understanding of the universe.

Kozyrev conducted experiments revealing that liquids, especially water and mercury, interact with "time stuff" differently than solids. He developed the "Kozyrevs mirror" based on these findings and took it to the North Pole, suspecting temperature fluctuations at the poles impacted time due to frozen water. Historical periods such as the Kali Yuga, Dwapara, and Bronze Age are linked to the solar system's distance from the galactic center, affecting human consciousness and technological advancements. The Harparan civilization, unique in its design and peace, mysteriously disappeared, with hints of ancient nuclear war in the Indus Valley.

The text discusses the concept of ages, specifically the transition from the Kali Yuga to the ascending Bronze Age. It describes the dominant influence of the Khazarian mafia during the Kali Yuga and their desire to maintain control in the Bronze Age. The writer is optimistic about shedding the lingering influences of the Kali Yuga, especially with advancements in understanding reality, time, and physics. There's also a mention of political issues, breakthroughs by the Russians in "time stuff," and a critique of Einstein's theories in favor of other physics perspectives.

The writer expresses skepticism towards celebrated scientists like Einstein, Pasteur, and Curie, claiming they were merely plagiarists and products of the Khazarian Mafia's propaganda. The author implies a mistrust towards anyone with a Nobel Prize, suggesting they're promoted by the Khazarian Mafia for an agenda. The author plans to return to their Kozyrev experiments after completing chores and anticipates discussing upcoming "emotional peaks" in future posts.

#Einstein #QuantumMechanics #NicolaKozyrev #TimeDimension #Consciousness #EricWeinstein #GeometricUnityModel #ThoughtCrime #Astrophysics #Gulag #Experiments #QuantumMechanics #ActiveQualitiesOfTime #Einstein #Experiments #Mercury #TimeTravel #PulseOfUniverse #OntologicalUnderstanding #Physics #TimeResearch #LiquidsInteraction #NorthPole #Kali Yuga #Dwapara #BronzeAge #GalacticCenter #HumanConsciousness #HarparanCivilization #IndusValley #AncientNuclearWar #Kali Yuga #BronzeAge #KhazarianMafia #Time #Physics #Einstein #RussianBreakthroughs #AgeOfAquarius #Transition #Einstein #Pasteur #Curie #Plagiarism #KhazarianMafia #NobelPrize #Skepticism #KozyrevExperiments #EmotionalPeaks

Episode Summary:

The news consumed daily often lacks truth, with the media shaping the narrative. When one speaks the truth, they feel empowered. The narrative touched on the response to a guest's appearance at an event, mentioning the reception and comparison to being unemployed. The text then delved into politicians, their nature, and their tendency to seek affirmation. Politicians often agree with opponents before debates even start, weakening their stance. There was a mention of how people were expected to adhere to COVID protocols without questioning, and the inherent rights of Americans being overlooked.

The text examines the portrayal of Russia as an enemy and the potential biases in such portrayals. It contrasts the perceived threats from Russia with other issues, such as the fentanyl crisis tied to Mexico. The writer challenges the dominant narrative about topics like graffiti, indicating it's a sign of societal decline. The text concludes by discussing religious freedom, especially in Ukraine, criticizing those who turn a blind eye to the imprisonment of Christian clergy due to their views.

The speaker critiques a so-called Christian leader advocating for the use of cluster bombs in Ukraine, questioning such a viewpoint's alignment with Christian values. The speaker emphasizes the role of true leadership, particularly in times of conflict, as bringing order and predictability rather than inciting more chaos. He expresses skepticism about American foreign policy decisions, stressing the importance of democratic input. The speaker also reflects on the events of January 6, questioning perceptions and underlying motivations, emphasizing the need to critically examine narratives.

The author condemns vandalism, specifically window breaking, emphasizing its difficulty in fixing. They express surprise at being labeled racist for opposing it. The author calls for rational conversations about controversial topics, highlighting the January 6 Capitol event. They address doubts about the election process and how democracy can't exist without free speech. The writer criticizes the suppression of discussions on democracy and points out that true threats are those based on truth, not lies. They end with an analogy, suggesting that lies are often overlooked, but truth elicits a strong response.

The speaker touches on multiple issues, from actual crimes to thought crimes, emphasizing the unpredictability of truth in today's world. They criticize the media for its bias and mention their disengagement from conventional news outlets. By presenting specific examples, the speaker emphasizes the disconnect between major societal debates and the real issues at hand. They suggest some controversial stories might be distractions from deeper problems. Lastly, the narrative delves into an anecdote about the Biden White House, ending with a humorous piece of advice about not trusting a man with numb gums.

#news #lie #media #truth #power #politicians #affirmation #charm #debate #RepublicanParty #rules #COVID #mask #vaccination #inherentRights #war #Ukraine #Russia #enemy #weapon #Ukraine #American #fundamentalRight #expression #fentanyl #Mexico #epidemic #pandemic #NaziGermany #propaganda #graffiti #vandalism #societyCollapse #civilization #selfRespect #propagandists #RepublicanNominee #UkraineClergy #prison #religiousFreedom #ChristianLeader #imprisoned #views #ChristianLeader #Ukraine #ClusterBombs #NewTestament #Peace #Government #Missiles #Tanks #Leadership #Chaos #Order #Predictability #Dad #AmericanLeadership #Administration #RepublicanParty #Trump #ForeignPolicy #Democracy #Washington #TransRights #Congress #Bathrooms #Russia #January6 #Election #FootLocker #Congress #Macys #vandalism #windowBreaking #difficulty #racist #rationalConversation #January6 #Capitol #electionProcess #democracy #freeSpeech #suppression #truth #lies #response #analogy #goodguy #skis #mistakes #defrauded #cryptocurrency #crimes #burning #wars #border #historiccrimes #thoughtcrimes #news #NewYorkTimes #truth #NorthStar #thoughtcriminals #censorship #lunacy #Nebraska #Indiantribe #claims #transrights #menbreastfeeding #pushback #Ukrainewar #COVID #January6 #Biden #cocaine #MarionBarry #media #rearrange #television #numbgums

Ep. 9 The Andrew Tate interview – 07-11-2023

Ep. 9 The Andrew Tate interview - 07-11-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

This piece discusses Tucker Carlson's criticism of perceived efforts to suppress masculine qualities in the United States and the broader impact on young boys. Highlighted is the controversial figure, Andrew Tate, who encourages self-improvement and masculinity, and was a major internet presence before being arrested in Romania, ostensibly for human trafficking. The allegations, accusing the Tates of coercing women into making monetized TikTok videos, are met with skepticism by Carlson, suggesting the charges might be a way to silence this counter-narrative. The piece ends by emphasizing the need to question such processes, pointing out that consent and free will can be undermined by state interventions.

The subject, named Andrew, has been incarcerated under serious charges which he claims are baseless. Accused of convincing girls to monetize their TikTok accounts, he maintains that there are no financial transactions linked to him. After seven months under house arrest, he was put in a Romanian jail for 92 days without any charge. Andrew suspects that the accusations of human trafficking against him, despite being baseless and denied by the alleged victims, are part of an attempt to slander his name due to his influence. The case is awaiting analysis by the Romanian judicial system.

Andrew Tate, currently residing in Romania, offers an introspective look at his experiences involving allegations of human trafficking, incarceration, and the subsequent toll on his mental health. Amidst the seriousness of the charges, he reflects on the ramifications on his life, highlighting the ease with which reputations are tarnished. He also emphasizes the changing public perception toward accusations, hinting at a society skeptical of truth in such cases. His stint in a Romanian prison was marked by harsh conditions, mental health issues, and his struggle to support his family from inside. Despite the dire situation, he remains hopeful, keeping his spirits up and valuing resilience above all else.

The discussion centers around the speaker's experiences in Romania amid geopolitical tensions and the role of the US embassy. The speaker, who is half British, half American, feels frustrated and homeless due to indifference from his home countries when he's accused of a crime in Romania. The speaker's controversial message of traditional masculinity is said to have led to his negative reception. This message advocates for men to have standards, boundaries, and to resist certain ideas. The speaker suggests that his influence poses a threat to those promoting 'slave programming', and he criticizes the weaponization of virtue against him. Despite adversity, he maintains that men should strive for virtuous relationships.

The speaker emphasizes the necessity of masculine excellence and self-improvement in a hyper-competitive world to resist societal pressures and manipulation. He criticizes individuals' blind acceptance of misleading information and encourages self-reflection, bravery, and non-compliance. He speaks about his personal belief in God and views life's challenges as divine tests to develop mental resilience. He argues that acknowledging and enduring pain and suffering can be formative experiences that shape a person's character. Lastly, he references Newton's law, implying that the presence of evil suggests the existence of an equal and opposite force of good, which he identifies as God.

The text describes the speaker's belief in God as a force of good in the world. They suggest there's a division in Western society between thinkers and those who unthinkingly follow trends, lacking a moral compass. They recount their personal experience during COVID, observing a nonchalant approach to the pandemic in Sweden compared to harsh lockdowns elsewhere. They express their shock at people's refusal to accept this contradictory reality. The speaker also discusses their legal troubles, believing they're targeted due to their controversial views that challenge mainstream narratives. They critique the UK for becoming increasingly authoritarian, a sharp departure from its reputation as a bastion of free speech.

The speaker criticizes UK's increasing legal impositions and deteriorating living conditions, including the fall in education standards and rise in crime rate. They argue Europe is dealing with similar issues, as governments focus more on suppressing voices discussing problems rather than addressing the issues themselves. They emphasize the disruption of power balances due to the feminization of native men and immigration of high testosterone men from the Third World, leading to a power vacuum. The speaker sees their personal legal troubles as a punishment for defiance against these societal changes. Despite legal troubles, they express love for Romania and believe that their predicament would have been the same anywhere in the Western world.

The speaker discusses the illusion of reality, comparing it to the Matrix, and the concept of agents keeping people from realizing the truth. They delve into the topic of how public perception is manipulated, using COVID as an example. The speaker stresses the importance of questioning narratives, discussing political events, including the situation in Ukraine and Russia, emphasizing that good and bad in wars aren't simple distinctions. They also recall their father, a chess master and former CIA linguist, whose predictions about the world's future, found in his Twitter feed, have proven prescient. Lastly, they argue that the U.S. interest in certain conflicts can be attributed to power and money.

The speaker discusses the perceived erosion of freedom and democracy, attributing it to powerful individuals or entities. He questions whether complying with societal norms and expectations genuinely leads to happiness or fulfillment, especially for men. He criticizes the current approach to men's mental health, advocating for a paradigm that includes pride and self-respect. He parallels his struggle to speak out against societal norms with a war, either against external injustices or internal discontentment. He emphasizes the importance of self-respect and dignity, and highlights his role as an influencer advocating for self-improvement, financial independence, and physical strength. He concludes by acknowledging potential repercussions but stands firm in his belief of benefiting the world.

The speaker reflects on the changing nature of media attacks and believes that these old tactics no longer work. They discuss their view on depression, arguing that it's a state of mind, not a condition, and how this belief has helped them maintain a resilient mindset. They suggest that depression is a tool for population control, preferring principled, energetic individuals. They also argue that depression is a sign that something in life needs to change, and transforming your life through hard work and dedication can alleviate feelings of depression. They emphasize the importance of having emotional motivation for significant tasks and change, and how discomfort can serve as a catalyst for self-improvement.

The text speaks about the necessity for men to change their mindset and confront their problems head-on, rather than succumbing to depression. The author emphasizes on the value of stoicism, self-improvement, and relentless competition, regardless of emotional state. It underlines the importance of maintaining a masculine support network and upholding principles of honor, hard work, and self-respect. It further criticizes societal norms that demotivate men and force them into loneliness, arguing that a man should be able to rely on himself and others' respect to navigate life successfully. It concludes by discussing the destructive effects of pornography and the misinterpretation of equal rights, contributing to the downfall of masculine virtue.

The speaker tackles issues of masculinity, sex, and porn addiction in today's globalized sexual marketplace. They advocate for "masculine excellence" as the answer to many of men's problems, including pornography addiction, loneliness, and being respected by peers. According to the speaker, men should strive to improve themselves rather than blaming societal conditions for their problems. They share their own journey from a difficult childhood to becoming a kickboxing world champion, emphasizing the importance of hard work, self-accountability, and dignity. The speaker also discusses the concept of leaving a lasting legacy, suggesting that success is not just a personal achievement, but also a responsibility towards one's family name.

The speaker discusses his views on women, emphasizing their power and his respect for them. He disagrees with the idea of unconditional compliance with women's wishes, arguing for a standard of mutual respect and accountability. He criticizes female promiscuity, arguing it has been historically and globally discouraged. The speaker claims he is often wrongly accused of misogyny due to his outspoken views and the misrepresentation of his content. He asserts that he has substantial support from women, contradicting the general accusation of him being misogynistic. The speaker also briefly discusses the issue of race, suggesting that societal elites are fueling racial division.

The speaker reflects on discrimination experienced due to being a straight male rather than due to his mixed race. He criticizes the victimhood narrative pushed by politicians like Kamala Harris, suggesting it's more destructive than empowering. Using examples from history, he dissects the global presence of slavery and argues that self-accountability, discipline, and hard work can propel anyone, regardless of race, to success. The speaker also appreciates physical fitness, especially for leaders, and shares his confusion at Joe Biden's popularity. Finally, he connects the hostility from a Wisconsin state senator to the issue of perpetual victimhood.

The speaker discusses the irony of a senator feeling oppressed and criticizing others for their better lives, indicating a division fueled by those in power. The speaker reveals his plans to become a climate change activist, acknowledging the hypocrisy of such a decision given his high-carbon lifestyle. He critiques the tokenistic meeting between Greta Thunberg and Zelensky, questioning its true purpose. Finally, he argues against climate change solutions that impose financial burdens on citizens and don't genuinely address the issue, calling such strategies 'Trojan horses'. He insists that his disagreement does not imply disregard for nature, but stems from a critical view of the legislation and the true intentions behind it.

The speaker discusses their charitable actions, and laments being judged negatively despite their efforts. They argue that strength, principles, and resilience are essential for doing good, while criticizing the modern culture's attack on "strong men" and promoting "weak men". They relate societal issues to weak men lacking emotional control, and committing destructive acts. The speaker also critiques mainstream media, the concept of 'fake news', and political incompetence, particularly referring to Putin and Biden. They link happiness with strength, arguing weak men can't be content. Lastly, they touch on women's roles as societal barometers, stating that women inherently desire strong men.

The text discusses societal expectations and issues from a male perspective. It argues that the decline of female happiness in the west is due to a lack of "real men" who can provide and protect, caused by societal decay and absence of morals and principles. The author expresses concerns over the impact of societal programming, suggesting women are more susceptible, leading to emotionally charged decisions. This susceptibility, coupled with the lack of strong, masculine leadership, allegedly leads to chaos and unhappiness in women's lives. Finally, the author warns against the societal push for female dominance, which he believes can be easily manipulated, leading to further societal issues.

The text explores diverse societal issues, centering on gender identity, societal expectations, and mental health. It challenges the concept of gender fluidity and the normalization of gender transitioning, suggesting a negative impact on mental health. It opposes the idea that gender is merely a social construct and highlights the distinct roles and strengths of both genders. It mentions how different cultures approach gender variance, as in the case of Thailand's "lady boys". The text voices concern over youth being pressured into life-altering decisions like gender reassignment, and the effect this could have on their future happiness. It emphasizes the importance of respecting biological realities and individual perceptions.

The text delves into various controversial subjects including identity, societal norms, cultural differences, and societal self-destruction. The author, who names himself King Andrew, criticizes Western societies for their supposed self-destructive tendencies, and their concern over identity politics and gender issues, which he perceives as distractions from real problems. He draws comparisons to the fall of Rome to underscore his point. Furthermore, he discusses the influence of the Internet and state on children, arguing for the right to instill his own values in his offspring. Lastly, he expresses concerns about the targeting of children by ideologies he sees as dangerous, suggesting a need for protection.

The speaker challenges notions of western patriarchy and criticizes ideologies that use manipulation, particularly of susceptible children, to spread their views. They argue that this approach, used by various factions including LGBTQ proponents, is akin to brainwashing and is unfair compared to challenging an informed adult. They link the proliferation of such ideas to a lack of real struggle in the west, implying that many seek out problems due to the relative comfort of their lives. Finally, they suggest that harsher conditions, such as a famine, would quickly dissolve these constructed issues and roles, with people reverting to traditional survival strategies.

The speaker argues for respecting men's role in protecting society, emphasizing historical gender roles as survival necessities. They challenge modern shifts towards feminizing men as untested, raising concerns about national competitiveness. The speaker endorses a high-protein diet, caffeine, and nicotine, associating the latter with testosterone and resistance to conformity. They theorize that society seeks to reduce testosterone to make men more compliant. Lastly, the speaker voices fears about the rise of digital currencies, viewing them as tools for total societal control, noting their potential use in tracking, and controlling spending habits, and expressing worry about the phasing out of physical cash.

The speaker shares his beliefs about societal control through financial dependency, suggesting this is the real reason behind his unpopularity. He argues that the government doesn't want its citizens financially independent because it's easier to control destitute people. The speaker challenges the perception of wealth as negative and suggests his financial success offers resistance to manipulation. He encourages his young followers to seek wealth and resist societal control. The speaker also claims governments desire absolute control over their citizens, likening it to a slow encroachment towards communism. He emphasizes the importance of a financially independent populace to resist this control.

#1950s #60s #6thGradeBoys #Accountability #Accusations #Adam #Adult #AfghanDefenseForce #Aggression #America #AmericanCitizen #AmericanInfluence #AndrewTate #AncestorPride #Arrogant #Attack #Authoritarian #Aztecs #Backbone #Balance #Barriers #Bathrooms #BBC #BeachfrontProperty #Belief #Benefit #Bigot #Bills #BlackSea #Blackbillionaire #Boundary #Boundaries #Brainwashing #Bravery #Bribe #British #BritishAmericanGovernments #BritishParliament #Brother #Bugatti #Burma #Camouflage #Camaraderie #Capitalism #CaptiveAudience #CarbonFootprint #Care #Case #Castration #Caucasian #Censorship #Change #charges #Chaucescu #Cheat #Chessmaster #Children #CIA #ClimateChangeActivist #ClimateChangeAwareness #Communism #Competition #Compliance #Consequences #Conviction #Coercion #Control #Controlled #ConversionTherapy #Corruption #Court #CourtCases #Cowardice #COVID #Crimea #CrimeRate #CriticalThinking #Cryptocurrency #Cuba #CulturalDifferences #Culture #Currency #Destructive #Defend #Defiance #Depressed #Depression #Destiny #DestructiveMindset #Dignity #Discipline #Discrimination #Dishonesty #Disparity #Diversity #Donation #Duty #EarlyWarningSystem #EconomicClass #EducationSystem #Emotion #EmotionalCoercion #EmotionalControl #EmotionalSecurity #EmotionalStability #EmpiricalEvidence #Enemy #Energy #EnergyCrisis #Englishflags #Englishman #Eunuchs #Europe #Evidence #Evil #EvolutionaryStandards #Exceptional #ExceptionalMan #Exercise #Expensive #FalseAccusations #FalseNarratives #Family #FarmAnimals #Father #FeedingChildren #FemaleHappiness #FeminineWoman #Feminism #Feminize #FinancialCrime #FinancialFreedom #FinancialProvision #FinancialSuccess #FinancialTransaction #ForeignCountry #FormativeExperiences #France #Fraud #FreeSpeech #Freedom #GenderAffirmingCare #GenderDifferences #GenderDysphoria #GenderIdentity #GenderRoles #God #Good #GoodGuy #Google #GretaThunberg #Guilt #Gym #Happiness #HardWork #HatePeddling #HeinousActs #Honor #Hope #House #HouseArrest #Hypocrisy #HyperCompetition #HyperCompetitive #Ideology #Ignorance #Impulsiveness #Incompetence #Individuals #Indoctrination #Influence #Influencer #Injustice #Innocence #Insanity #Internet #InternetArguments #InternetInfluence #Investigation #Invasion #IslamicLaw #IslamicWorld #Jail #JeffreyEpstein #Job #JoeBiden #Judges #Judgment #JulianAssange #JusticeMachine #KamalaHarris #KennedysMotorcade239 #KickboxingWorldChampion #KingAndrew #LadyBoys #Language #Law #Lawyer #Leadership #Legacy #LegalSystem #LGBTQ #Life #Lies #Linguist #LivingStandards #Loneliness #LongFormatContent #Longing #Love #LoveLetters #LoverBoyMethod #Lucy #Lukashenko #MaleSupportNetwork #MalleablePopulace #Marriage #MasculineExcellence #MasculineHappiness #MasculineIssues #MasculineMan #MasculineRole #Masculinity #Media #MediaAttack #MediaCoverage #MediaMachine #Medialaws #Medication #Men #MensMentalHealth #MentalChange #MentalHealth #MentalHealthProblems #MentalResilience #MentalState #Message #Migration #Mind #Mindset #MingDynasty #Misogynist #Misogyny #Misogynyaccusations #MixedRace #Morality #Motivation #Myanmar #Narrative #NationalSecurity #NatureConservation #NatureOfPeople #Negativity #NewsConsumer #NonCompliance #Obey #Obedience #Oppression #Outlawed #Outofcontext #Pain #Pandemic #Parameters #Patriarchy #Penalties #Perception #Performance #PhysicalCondition #PhysicalProtection #PhysicalStrength #PickupTruck #Playbook #Police #Porn #PornStar #Power #PowerGrab #PowerVacuum #Pride #PrideFlags #Principled #Principles #Prison #Programming #Propaganda #Protection #PTSD #Public #PublicConsciousness #Punishment #Putin #Question #Rational #Rebellion #Relationship #Resentment #Resist #Resistance #Respect #Responsibilities #Rich #RichCountry #RobertFKennedy #Romania #RomanianJudicialSystem #RomanianPopulation #RomanianPrison #Rome #Sarajevo #Saying #Security #Senator #Sex #SexCrime #SexualAccess #SexualEducation #SexualMarketplace #SexualOrientation #SexualRelationships #SickCountry #Silence #SingleMotherHousehold #Slander #Slavery #SlaveProgramming #SocialMedia #Society #SocietalDecay #SocietalDestruction #SocietalExpectations #SocietalNorms #SocietalPolarity #SocietalRoles

Ep. 9 The Andrew Tate interview - 07-11-2023

Hey, it's Tucker Carlson. Imagine being a 6th grade boy in the United States right now. What are you hearing at school? What are they telling you on the Internet? Well, they're telling you to stop being yourself.

Sit still, stop joking. Suppress your aggression. Share your feelings. Obey. Female qualities are virtuous.

Masculine qualities are oppressive. That's the message. In case it wasn't clear enough, schools around the country have removed urinals from boys bathrooms. The male body itself is shameful. Sit down when you pee, like a good little girl.

Views like this are often called feminism or woke politics, but in fact they amount to mass conversion therapy, an attempt to change the fundamental nature of people. Nothing like this has ever been attempted at scale. It's one of the most grotesque and destructive experiments in human history. What would it be like to find yourself the subject of that experiment as a boy trying to become a man during the biden years? Well, you might kill yourself.

Many have. You might decide to reject your own manhood and embrace androgyny or even switch sexes. Girls are better. Fine, I'll become one. Or more likely, you might simply withdraw into porn and weed and video games and give up on your life before it's begun.

You might retire at 19, a less dramatic form of suicide. All around us, this is happening. Noticing it is forbidden. But that does not make it any less real. So it's probably not surprising that Andrew Tate was the most Googled man in the world last year.

He offers a different vision. Tate is a former professional kickboxer who, about a decade ago, began posting advice to young men on social media. Tate's view is that men want respect above all. It's how they're wired. In order to get respect, men must become worthy of it.

They must become more impressive. Wake up early. Work as hard as you can. Stay sober. Find God.

Keep yourself physically fit. Don't complain that's his worldview. Earlier generations of Western leaders might have found parts of Tate's message inspiring. Now it's seen as a threat. The media treated him like a criminal up until the day he was officially classified as one.

Just after Christmas last year, tate and his brother Tristan were arrested and thrown into prison in Romania, where they live. The Tates were held without charges for three months, very likely with the encouragement of the British and American governments. In June, they were charged with human trafficking. They're now under house arrest until their trial. Are the Tates guilty of human trafficking?

We're not their lawyers, but it's worth noting that as of today, not a single woman has come forward to say that she was kidnapped or imprisoned or moved across international borders against her will by Andrew or Tristan Tate. It's also true that in some ways, the charges against the Tates seem inevitable, like they were always going to happen. Accusing a man of a sex crime is the fastest possible way to discredit what he's saying. Days after WikiLeaks revealed that the US government had been spying on its allies and lying about it, julian Assange was arrested in London for rape. Nine years later, prosecutors dropped the case against Assange for lack of evidence, though somehow that fact was not as widely covered.

Is that what's happening here? Again, we don't know. Jeffrey Epstein's dinner partners insist that Andrew Tate is a pervert and a criminal. Maybe they're telling the truth. Either way, we think Tate's views about men very much deserve a hearing.

So we flew to Romania to talk to him. We're posting the entire interview here on Twitter because we've been assured it will not be taken down for ideological reasons, as so much of his content has been. The video is long, but if you can take the time to watch it, make up your own mind about Andrew Tate. Here it is. So what are you charged with?

That's a really good question. I'm charged with being the head of an organized criminal group which is in charge of recruiting girls to make TikTok videos to steal the money from the TikTok views. Recruiting girls to make TikTok videos and stealing the money. So it's really a financial crime? It looks that way.

And it's very interesting because the girls who they've identified to add to the file are saying that we're not victims of anything and this isn't true. But the state believes it's true. And the state thinks that I, as a 35 year old man, woke up, I was already extremely financially successful. I was already a father, I was already very well known. I had no financial motivation.

I have no criminal record. It's not my personality profile. But I woke up the age of 35 and decided to make girls do TikTok to enrich myself with the pennies that I would earn from TikTok views. So in the United States, I think the belief is that you were charged with human trafficking. Yeah, that's human trafficking, because what you do is you force a girl to work against her will for financial gain.

That's human trafficking. And their justification for this is that girls do TikTok. Some girls I know, who they found, who say they're not victims, have TikTok accounts. How do you force someone to do TikTok videos? I guess the prosecutor is going to have to explain that, isn't he?

It's a very interesting scenario I'm in, and I'm inside of Romania, so I have to show a degree of respect to the Romanian judicial system, and I have to show a degree of respect to the situation I'm in. But the overall charge is that there's an organized criminal group. There's a group of us. I'm the head of it. My brother is the below me.

And we use the lover boy method to convince women to do TikTok videos to make money so that we can steal the TikTok money so there's no just to be clear, you are not accused of pandering, of pimping, forcing women to have sex with anybody? No, not forcing to have sex, not restraining their movement, not stopping them from living a full life, but the fact that we are somehow convincing them to have TikTok, very interesting. I don't think but there's no actual I'm asking you this because I do think it's a widespread belief that you were accused of pimping. Yeah. That has nothing to do with any of this case.

Absolutely nothing. And it's kind of scary, because the crime in itself of human trafficking is a unique one, because they can ignore the statement of the victim. So the girls have come forward and said, this is insane. You've just picked us because we're near andrew and we're his friends. But the whole idea of the crime is they can say that she's brainwashed.

Right. She's under duress. So you can ignore her statement. State says she's a victim regardless of the fact that she says she's not a victim. So it's very interesting because the difference between sex and rape is consent.

Right, right. But they remove all of that. They're like, nope, you're a victim. No matter what you say, we're deciding you're a victim. And they've chosen them.

And of course, these girls do nothing pornographic. They've never had sex with anyone, nothing to do with that. So they've picked TikTok. So it's scary. Imagine you're a full grown man anywhere in the world today, they can find two girls who have TikTok on their phone, which is every single female on the planet, and they can accuse you of forcing them to take the TikTok money.

And even if the girls say they didn't do that, this isn't true, then you're still a human. But force, what does that consist of? Forcing someone to do something? Are they accusing you of using violence? No, they're accusing me and this thing they're accusing me of using the lover boy method, coercing them by being nice.

By the way, these charges presumably are public, so they're public, and this is extremely serious, but if you actually analyze the overall case against me, they're saying that andrew and his brother, by being nice men, convinced girls to have TikTok accounts and then take the money. And it's very interesting, because inside of the entire case file, there's not a single financial transaction to us for money. What are the penalties? They're extremely severe. Five to ten years in jail.

And I've already served coming up now, seven months in a form of jail. They can only you are essentially incarcerated right now. Absolutely. I'm on house arrest, and that counts as jail. You can only be held six months without charge.

I was initially picked up, thrown in a cell without charge, and I think the intention of the entire investigation at that point was to find the crime, because they had very, very weak evidence. They contacted 2000 people who know me or knew me. They tried very hard to convince some female somewhere to come forward and say something bad about me. The media machine, which works hands in hands with the justice machine, as you know very well, did exactly that. In fact, they offered bribes.

Effectively. They'd call up ex girlfriends and say, if you have anything bad to say about Andrew, we can pay you $50,000 for the story. And they tried very hard. They didn't find any evidence of anything. They then released me on house arrest.

And then two days before the legal limit in which they had to drop everything, they charged me with whatever they had from the beginning, which is very little. And now we have to wait for the Romanian judicial system to analyze the file and, God willing, throw it away. How long did you spend in jail? I was in jail for 92 days in a Romanian jail cell. What was that like?

It was certainly interesting experience. I won't lie and say it was easy. It was certainly very difficult, the uncertainty of it. It's a very uncertain situation to be picked up on just before New Year's Eve and thrown in a cell without charge. And I'm asking different prison guards and different prisoners, how long am I going to be here?

One prisoner is like, I've been here two years. I was like, have you been charged? He goes, yeah, but I haven't gone to court yet. Like, everyone's been there for years. I thought I was going to be there for years.

And it certainly takes a mental toll on you. And I think jail is a different experience when you know you're innocent. When there was a guy in there for murder, he's like, yeah, I murdered someone. I'm in jail. You can kind your soul and your mind accept the punishment for a crime, but when you've actually done nothing wrong, I think jail is a lot harder.

Did you know why you were there? Not initially. So for about the first two weeks, I never actually got told in English what I was accused of because I was arrested on December 29. There's new York. What were the circumstances of that?

Yeah, December, armed guards ran in this house. They spent all day searching the entire house. They were very interested in electronics, as most federal agencies are. And then they took me that evening and said, we're going to go and put you in jail for 24 hours. And after 24 hours, you see a judge, and the judge will decide if you stay in jail.

And the judge decided I should. What did you do? I mean, did you make who'd you call? I had a lawyer, and my lawyer came and he said, we need to analyze the case file. When you see what they have against you, you're being accused of human trafficking.

It's like, human trafficking? That's insane. Who? When? What?

I went to jail. And then I was given all this paper in Romanian. I don't speak Romanian, although I live here. And then I was waiting for the translation. So I think it's about two weeks before I finally got the papers in English to understand why I was in a jail cell.

And then I really understood how insane the accusations were. What is human trafficking? Yeah. So the overall, my understanding of it, they're saying that human trafficking is when you convince a woman to do something she doesn't want to do for financial gain. And there's different methods.

You can do that. You can do that through force, and you can also do that through emotional coercion. I think most people, just speaking from the American perspective, most people believe that human trafficking is effectively slavery, selling human beings. And that's what I believe as well. Absolutely.

And this is the thing that's so interesting. When you finally end up the enemy of the matrix and they use the legal system as a weapon to punish you for having an opinion, you realize how subjective the law is, right? Because it can be a weapon when you have something subjective. You can just pick and choose. So if they sit and say, ah, human trafficking is a woman doing something for financial gain against her will via emotional coercion.

Well, he knows these two girls. They have TikTok, emotional coercion, convincing her that's what I'm accused of because they have no proof of me doing anything wrong. So they said, he's convinced these girls to do TikTok for money. The girls have said themselves have said this is not true, and the state is denying their statement, saying, no, you're brainwashed, it is true, and I went to jail. So how is the state so the state is trying to coerce the women.

So how is the state not committing human trafficking by the same definition? Absolutely. It's very interesting. It's very interesting that you can sit someone down and tell them they're a victim when they say they're not a victim. You're a victim of being coerced, and we're going to try to coerce you into conceding you were coerced.

Exactly. It's a very interesting scenario. Okay. Yeah, it's a very interesting scenario. Up until this point, no judge has looked at the evidence of the case.

So up until this point, I've been to court a bunch of times, but the only reason I was in court was to discuss my preventative detention. So under Romanian law, if you being free can impede the investigation, you should stay in jail. So the judge agreed that, yeah, maybe if he's free, he can damage this investigation because they're trying very hard to get something on this guy. So I've done a bunch of jail time, and now it just begins. The judge is going to look at the case and like I said, God willing, I still have enough faith in the Romanian judicial system that she's going to look at this and go, this is not a crime.

You're aware of the media coverage of this, however, so you're in jail for 90 days or more, and the rest of the world is talking about you. Do you know what they're saying? They're saying very heinous things. And I would hate to come across as a conspiracy theorist, Tucker, but I kind of have a feeling that this might be something to do with my influence and an attempt to slander my name. Perhaps I'm crazy, but the fact that they chose such a heinous crime and they reported it so heavily, and they won't shut up and keep repeating, basically a slander attack day after day after day.

Also, considering the fact that other people who genuinely commit heinous crimes have far more favorable press coverage, I don't want you to think I'm a conspiracy theorist. Please, Tucker, I would hate for you to come here and call me crazy, but something very strange about it, and I think the what, when Jeffrey Epstein's friends call you Immoral yeah. The goal of it is certainly to slander my name, and I like to see it as a litmus test. I like to see it as an intelligence test. Anybody who wakes up and looks at me and goes, he's a human trafficker.

Because of TikTok, they're fully gone. But from the west, just to defend the average news consumer in the west, sure. Andrew Tate kind of an outlaw, lives in some palace in Romania, wherever that is. And Romania sounds like the kind of place where human trafficking is like the main industry. A lot of it happens here.

That's what's so crazy about it. Right. What's so crazy is, if they really want to find a human trafficker, I think they could probably do it quite easily, but they managed to get me. That's certainly the perception, but it's one of those charges that kind of sells itself. Oh, absolutely.

And it doesn't matter if you're found guilty or not, right. You're a human trafficker forever. But I do think that public consciousness is changing. I think with things like, there's been some very large court cases recently involving some very famous people in which women were caught lying, trying to slander men's names for rape and these kinds of things, and I don't think people believe it anymore. But that scares me to a degree, because I think that the typical weapon, the standardized playbook is now failing.

And know what the new playbook is going to be? Almost like better the devil. You know that you're too famous, you're too successful. We don't like you. Call him a rapist or a human trafficker, put him all over the news, slander his name, try and wreck his life.

Now that nobody believes it, what's the next move? What are they going to try next? Wouldn't it just have been easier to commit, like, a massive financial crime and defraud people of billions come up with like a fake cryptocurrency, call it like, I don't know, FTX, or just give a name to it and then random steal billions and get your parents involved and buy a bunch of real estate in the Bahamas. And then you'd be sort of a hero, right? Oh, absolutely.

And I would have certainly made a lot more money than TikTok because I don't think TikTok even pays you for views. And if it certainly does, I never got a single transaction from it. So it's a very interesting scenario. But if I was accused of a financial crime, my name would not be slandered. No, well, of course not.

You have the presumption of innocence. So just back to the jail thing. So you're in with your brother? At the beginning I was not, but towards the end I was. Yeah.

What did you do all day? It's a good question. I looked at the wall, stared at the wall, smoked cigarettes, lots of push ups, read the Quran. You smoked cigarettes, did push ups and read the Quran? Basically, yes.

And certainly had some introspective moments. Tried my best to get out. Tried my best to, via my small phone calls, understand what's happening in the outside world. Tried to make sure that the people I love and care about are taken care of. Because I'm the man of my family.

And I'm also the man of quite a large I wouldn't say empire, but life. And there's a whole lot of people who rely on me. You have staff and families, you have children and family feeling. Yeah. So when you're plucked from that, it's kind of strange.

You're in jail and you're concerned for yourself, but your primary concerns are also all your duties as a man. I have duties as a man. I don't want children to starve. You've got a whole tribe. I've got people to pay.

So it was very, very frustrating. Constantly trying to make sure everybody else was okay and feeling helpless. That's what hurt me the most. I was trying to make sure everybody I love and care about was fine and I wasn't as powerful as I should have been. And that was very upsetting.

And especially if they were going to keep me there for years, I was having serious concerns about how I can feed the people I love. Did you ever come to the edge at all? No. I certainly had. Some days I was less happy than others, but I made sure that my mindset was built in a way that I could always be doing something constructive.

And also, I think you get what you give in life. And if I ever felt particularly sad on a day, I would try very hard to make other people happy, because if I made other people smile, I'd feel better. So even the dinner ladies or the prison guards, I'd try very hard just to make people smile. I know it sounds silly, some of the prison guards some of the prison guards were more open than others. But there was a couple of prison guards who were ice cold, who didn't want to say a word to me and like, hey, bro, your hair looks amazing, and you just stare at me like, he wants shut up.

But I just try my best to cheer people up, to cheer myself up. And as a man, all you can do is just find the resolve to continue. You doing the best you can in this current circumstance. What were the other prisoners like? I don't want to insult Romania in any way.

And I love this country and I chose to live here. But if I had to describe it for the people, for an American audience to understand, I don't think Romania and a lot of these countries have the same kind of mental health set up or the mental health support that a lot of Western nations have. So you end up in jail. So I think there was a lot of mental health problems inside the jail. So it was very similar.

It wasn't just a jail. There was also a lot of mental health problems in there, which adds a new complexity and a new dimension to the suffering, because there's just random screaming and there's suicide, and it's certainly not a very nice place to be. Oh, so it's horrifying. Yeah. I don't want to go back.

You hear the phrase Romanian prison, and it sounds tough, so it was what you would imagine it is. And when this process is over, there's a lot more I will say. But I will say the staff were very nice to me. And I want to make this clear. I want to make it very clear that all the staff in the jail were very professional and very nice to me.

I would almost say that they believed I was innocent and they understood that I didn't belong there. There was a semi apologetic vibe to the way I was treated by the guards, if that makes sense. Yes, they understood very well. I don't think anybody, like I said, with a functioning brain, believes that me, at the age of 35, decided to steal TikTok money and ruin my entire life without financial motivation to girls who say they're not victims of anything. I don't think anybody with a brain well, the fact that you're not accused of a sex crime or of violence, which I think most people don't really understand, and they can look it up, but you're not actually accused of rape.

Correct. Selling anyone? Correct. Pimping. Correct.

Okay. That right there raises a lot of questions. Yeah. And this is the thing that's so interesting, because I'm accused of using a method of human trafficking called the lover boy method. So how that would traditionally work is a man would meet a girl, become her boyfriend, take her to another country, turn her into a prostitute say, I love you like pimping, of course.

But they're saying because all my conversations with these girls are very nice, they're saying that I use the lover boy method to convince them to do TikTok. And once again, I never made a penny from TikTok, and I have no interest in girls TikTok accounts, and I've never made any money from TikTok in my life. So that right there, I think we can let people assess. I'm not an expert on the Romanian legal code, but that's kind of not the impression that most people have, and that's the media who have made that very the media have tried very hard to do that. And if I had to estimate, I think that the overall intention was just to throw me in a cell, use the media machine to drum up something real.

I think that's what the goal was. I believe that obviously one thing I've never been to Romania before, and one thing I'm struck by is the American presence here. Oh, it's massive. Fully understand that. So there are three NATO bases here now.

They're bustling because of the war in Ukraine, one's on the Black Sea, right below Crimea. So this is strategically important, this country, to NATO. Absolutely. And so this is a lot less far away than I realized. It's much more American influence.

Oh, absolutely. Played a role. Yeah. Well, I think, and I don't want to get this incorrect, I think it's the second or third biggest US embassy in the world. The US embassy here looks like a prison.

It's huge. They've got a huge embassy here. And even during Chaucescu, during the communism days, romania was an ally of the west. Even during communism? Yes.

Chaucescu came to New York. Yes, that's right. Yeah. So Romania and America have been very good friends for a very long time.

I have to be careful what I say, but it's certainly very interesting what's happened to me. The American embassy were not particularly helpful, let's put it that way. They weren't very interested in me being locked up without charge. They didn't seem very interested in getting me out. But you're an American citizen.

Absolutely. So you're an American passport holder. Correct. So I think the average American believes, perhaps falsely, that if you're accused of a crime in a foreign country, particularly a less developed country like Romania, you go to the US embassy and someone takes an interest in your case just to make sure that your treatment falls within accepted standards of justice. Yeah, they came to see me, but when I was asking them what they can actually do about all of this, they weren't particularly helpful.

I don't want to pedal conspiracy theories, and I've heard a lot of information, et cetera, but I wouldn't say they sanctioned it. I don't know if they had to sanction it, but something they weren't particularly interested in getting me out, but at least they came to see me more than once. I mean, they kind of pretended to care. The UK Embassy didn't even pretend to care. The UK embassy was I really think they enjoyed it.

You're a British subject as well. Correct. And this is the kind of thing, and I want to say this here, that's kind of frustrating for me, because Romania is my home now for seven years. But I'm half British, half American originally, and when something like this happens to you, you have this longing for home. You kind of want to go home when you end up in a jail in a country where, even though you've lived for a long time, you don't speak the language, you don't understand the legal system.

Going to court in a foreign language is far more intimidating than in your own language. You don't have a clue what's being said, you don't understand how anything works. And then you kind of have this longing for home. But I feel like my home countries hate me and they hate me because of my message, which I believe to be a positive message. So you kind of have this strange feeling of homelessness, because it's like, well, if I go to the UK, I believe they're going to attack me the same.

If I go to America, I believe they're going to attack me the same. So where do you go? It's kind of scary. Where do you go? Good question.

We're going to have to see it. How did you wind up here? I moved to Romania. I came to visit a long time ago, before anybody ever visited Romania. I came to visit and I genuinely fell in love with the place.

It truly is a fantastic country. I love nature as an amazing nature. It's a very safe place. It has this reputation of being dangerous. It's not dangerous, it's very safe.

The people are very good. The people are very conservative. Traditionally, it's almost like America was 2030 years ago. It's gorgeous. They have a bunch of nice restaurants and plenty of things to do.

And I've never had a problem here in any way, never had any issue with the law or with the other side criminals, nothing, until this came out of nowhere. So it's been very strange. So what is it about your message? Do you think that infuriates certain people? Well, my message is traditional masculinity.

My message is to stand up and say what you mean and mean what you say. And even going to the gym nowadays is an act of defiance, because when you have a man who's built with any degree of principle, you say no to things. And I think if I have to analyze my message and why I'm so disliked by the people who dislike me, it's not the things I'm saying, it's the fact that if you adhere to my principles and you adhere to the things I say, you end up being the kind of person who. Will resist certain ideas. You say no.

What kind of man never says no? Name? A man who never says no. Men say no, right? Men wake up and say, no.

I don't think that should be done this way. No, my children will not be taught that. No father's primary job. Absolutely. So when you say to men, listen, you're allowed to have an opinion, you're allowed to have standards, you're allowed to have boundaries and barriers.

You're allowed to get up and become important and work hard and try hard and become the kind of man who can't be controlled, then you're seen as an enemy. And especially with the massive influence I've gained, I think they look at me and go, ah, he's helping men resist the slave programming. We don't need him around. We need to empty their brains so we can inject the slave programming and convince men to be eunuchs. Because once you're eunuched, then you're not a threat.

I think I buy that, because your message I'm not the world's expert on your message, but I've seen a lot of it, and it's not explicitly political, actually. No, it's not political at all. And their original attack before this Matrix attack is they weaponized virtue, which is what they usually do. There's no genuine virtue inside of these people. They weaponize virtue.

They find a virtue and they turn it to a bullet and they shoot at you. I'm sure you know very well. Yeah, I've heard. Yeah, I was a misogynist for the longest time just for saying that men should have standards. If you tell a man he could have standards in a relationship in any way, you're a misogynist.

It's actually very interesting because what does that mean, to have standards in a relationship? But this is the thing that's so interesting about it, because they've gendered the argument when I never did. I said, as a man, you shouldn't have a girlfriend who is a liar and a cheater, and you also shouldn't have male friends who are liars and cheaters. You shouldn't be around dishonest people, male or female men, and they gendered it and said, he's a misogynist. He's saying that men should only act this way with women, et cetera.

I said that men should have standards and you should have protocols that you're prepared to accept and you should have hard parameters. And if a woman doesn't want to adhere to those parameters, that's her decision and it's her prerogative. But you don't have to stay with her. Why should you? What's wrong with that?

Well, that's teaching men to say no. They don't want men to say no. So are you arguing that it's better to be with a virtuous woman? I think so, yes. I know that's.

No, I'm serious.

It seems like good advice. I don't want to come across as extreme, but yes, I am. And what's actually funny is I really believe most of the things I'm saying were accepted by absolutely everybody 15 years ago, ten years ago, and now it's public enemy number one. And it's because of the mass influence I have. At one point.

I became the most Googled man on Earth at one point. And it's a scary situation I'm in if you're arguing that it's really important for a man to find a good woman, a decent woman, an honest woman, that's the truest thing that's ever been said. Absolutely. That's the most important thing any man can do. I mean, I can just tell you firsthand, oh, thank you very much.

Married 32 years, that's the most important thing. And you think saying that anger to people? Absolutely, because I'm arguing the only way to do that is via masculine excellence. I'm saying in the world we live in today, it's hyper competitive. And if you want to be the kind of man that has the choice of women to choose a good one, you need to be an excellent man.

It's no longer acceptable for you to just be an average Joe or below average. You have to get up and you have to work hard and you have to be smart and interesting and you have to be charismatic and make some money and be in good shape, and you have to try very hard. And unfortunately for them, if you follow that path as a man and you become successful in those realms, you end up being the kind of person who resists enslavement. You become the kind of person who wakes up and says, no, I don't believe in that. That doesn't make sense to me.

I can't imagine a better message than that if you want a good society. So then you have to argue and sit and say, do these people want a happy, functioning society or do they want something else? What do you think? I think that I would never kill myself. And I also just throwing that out there.

And I also think that when you want to conquer a society, you kill the military aged males. That's what you do. That's the first thing they've ever done. They walk in and all the men have to have their throats cut. They can't perhaps do that, but they can certainly cut your balls off, and then you can't resist.

And I think there's certainly a movement to ensure that there's very little resistance left inside of the number one demographic which is required to resist oppression, which are military age males. And they don't want those kind of people waking up with any kind of self respect or standards or to say, no, I don't accept this. I do not need a 9th injection. They don't want that. They want you to sit and say, I don't need it.

But the news said so. Oh, well. So in the one interview that you and I did, you had a line that I've been thinking about ever since. I thought it was so interesting. I never thought of it before.

You said that a lot of people went along with the facts and that you didn't judge them because facts change. But now that we know that a lot of what we were told was wrong and some of it was a lie, it is a requirement of your own dignity, of your own self respect to say so completely and people should apologize. I really do believe, and I have nothing against the people who fell for the propaganda and I fell for the programming. Yes, I agree. Fine.

But you should wake up and say, I was fooled. I've learned my lesson. I will not be fooled again. But if you were fooled by the MSM and took the injection and you continued to be fooled and you have not self reflected and you have not realized that they lied to you the entire way and you now believe the new bunch of lies are all over the television, then there's something wrong with you. Or you don't care that you were lied to.

You don't care that you were lied to because you I think a lot of this is actually genuinely cowardice. I think it's a very easy worldview. The life is easier if you accept the news tells the truth. Yes, everything they want me to believe is true. Everything's nice and simple, good guys, bad guys do.

And if you want to actually wake up, it takes a degree of bravery because then you have to destroy your entire worldview, everything you've ever understood and everything you're told, and you have to really look at the world and go, oh, this is a mess. And that takes bravery. And once again, that's why they don't want men to be brave. They want you to sit there and go, oh, it's easier if just, you know, CNN said so. It must be true.

And it's cowardice. And they're trying to instill cowardice in all of us. That's what they're trying very hard to do. And I think even just me as a person, the people who hate me, my detractors, who dislike me so much, even if I say nothing, I just turn up, big, bald, strong, fast car. It's just me.

I'm like the enemy to them because I symbolize men who don't comply and not don't comply in a negative, law breaking way, but don't comply. If we don't agree with that or we don't see common sense in that, we're going to politely decline. And that's simply not allowed. What's it like to have the prospect of prison hanging over you? I think that I like to believe that this is a test from God.

I like to believe that if you become the most Googled man in the world for saying that you have mental resilience, that God is going to make sure you don't have that degree of fame without testing you. I like to believe that God comes along and says, yes, I've allowed you to become the top g. We're going to see if you really are the top g. I believe that's how the world works. It's certainly intimidating, especially knowing you're completely innocent, but I believe it's a test, and I believe it's my job to pass the test for my ancestors and for people watching over me and for God.

And I think I have to do the absolute best I can possibly do in the scenario and the circumstance. Regardless of whether I win or lose, I still believe I'm going to win because I've seen the case file and I've seen that no laws have been broken. But even in the very unfortunate circumstance that this Matrix attacks goes deep enough to throw me into a jail cell, I think I should handle it like a man. I think I should stay and finish the process and I should walk with my head held high and suffer as much as I need to suffer to stick by my convictions and know that I'm an innocent person. And I refuse to break, I refuse to cry, I refuse to be depressed about it.

I'm going to wake up and I'm going to smile regardless. And regardless of what happens to me, I want everyone to know that, one, I would never kill myself, and two, I think that as a man, there's always going to be a degree of pain and suffering in your journey. I don't think you're ever going to become a successful man or be good at being a man without pain and suffering. And there's many times in my life where something terrible happened to me. And at the time, if I could change it, I would have.

But retrospectively, you kind of look back and go, you know what? That was formulative for me. That's right. That is what God decided I needed to become who I became. So all of the pain and all the suffering I've ever gone through in my life ended up, in the end, building me into the person I am.

And I'm proud of who I am. So if God decides I need to go back to a Romanian dungeon for however many days, then all I can do is accept it and accept his plan and accept that it's going to make me a better person. So you see the hand of God in your life? Absolutely. I think that he is the best of planners.

And like I said, if you retrospectively analyze all the times in life you wish you could have changed things, he knew better, and I'm going to have to accept that. When did you conclude that? I think I guess I always kind of knew I was atheistic for a while when I was younger. But as you get older, you start to look at the world and understand that the thing for me was actually, I guess, a scientific principle. It was Newton's law of equal and opposite force.

If there is evil in the world, and I'd like to think we both agree there certainly is. Yes, there has to be an equal and opposite force which is good. And I would like to think of that as God, even the idea of God as a notion, even just as a concept, if that idea of God resists evil, then God is real. If you have two islands, you have two people, let's say a ship crashes and you have two people who swim to two different islands, and one island, they're atheists savages, and they rip you apart, and the other island, you get there and they believe in God, and they believe they're not allowed to kill you. Even just their idea of God, god saved your life.

So I think even just a concept of God in and of itself, if enough people believe and it makes them do good, then God must be true. And that's the equal and opposite force to the evil of the world. And this is how I view it. So I don't see how anybody with a conscience cannot believe in God anymore. That's such a profoundly different worldview from the one that we're presented with, I think.

Do you think that's maybe the division in the west between people who see those forces at work and those who don't, I think the west is actually split between people who think and people who don't think at all. I think that people there there are there's no such thing as these two opposing worldviews. I think people believe there's worldview A and worldview B. I disagree with that. I think there's worldview a the good guys, which are primarily people who do believe in God, do have parameters, do believe in standards, do believe in self respect, do know how to say no, and there's worldview B, which changes day by day regarding based on what they're told, which means they have no real worldview at all.

They just repeat, and they have no standards, and they have no parameters. There's nothing you can tell them that will make them wake up and go, that's wrong, because they have no inherent morality. So you can literally, you can say bestiality is accepted and encouraged. Now, it's good for you because for climate change. And they'll sit there and go, oh, for climate change, well, off we go.

And they'll just do it. So I think you have a camp of people who think, and you have a camp of people who repeat. And I don't think there's actually the opposing side to the good, I don't think function as a thinking populace at all. I think they simply repeat. It feels like the conflict between those two groups is getting more intense.

It's certainly getting more intense. And it was interesting for me because and I want to be an optimist, but I lost so much faith in humanity during COVID If you would have told me how COVID would have gone down before COVID I'd say, no way, we're not that bad. I thought, the people aren't that dumb. But when I experienced COVID, it's actually scary. You see how the Nazis managed to do what they did.

You see how they managed to put people in concentration camps. You see it. And I had a very unique view of COVID because in the first days of COVID when people were falling over in China and the Italian hospitals were overrun at the height of the panic, when most people believed because it was the very beginning, early stages. My brother and I had a very logical conversation and said, we're two military aged men in very good physical condition. If we die of this the world's over, if it can kill us, it's zombie apocalypse, so why are we going to live in fear?

So we found the only two countries that were open, which were Sweden and Belarus. We had just been to Belarus, this is before the Ukraine war. We'd just been there. We decided to try Sweden. So for the first three months of COVID during the height of lockdowns, when Florida was closed, when it was absolutely I remember, yeah, when it was the craziest lockdowns, globally, me and Tristan are in Sweden in absolute freedom.

They had no restrictions, no masks, no vaccine passports, no social distancing, nightclubs are full lunch, restaurants are open, perfectly complete, normal society. Nobody talks about this anymore, nobody talks about weight. Sweden never did a thing. Everything functioned perfectly fine the entire time and they don't have it. Where's their mass?

Where's their illness of severe their winter of severe illness and death? They never had one. It's a cold country. Never had one. So we were living in Sweden, living completely normal lives, seeing everyone, seeing the internet and seeing this insanity.

And we're like, well, surely if we just put up a few videos of us partying in Sweden, in nightclubs, this will wake people up. People didn't want us. People ignored their own eyes. That's the scariest thing about everything, is that they can get to a level where with the media machine, where people will genuinely ignore their own eyes. I don't understand how you can get people so brainwashed that they will see that the sky is blue and then they'll watch that the sky is green and then they'll look at it again and go, sky's green.

It's crazy to me, but COVID proves they can do that and that's why the war is getting so intense, because the principled people are saying, how can you still believe in the things that you're saying? Here is all the logical, empirical evidence that that is a lie. But these people are ideologically brainwashed and they don't want to take enough. They don't have the bravery it takes to wake up and accept that they're being lied to. So they'd rather, just to the end of time, repeat what they're told.

And it becomes more and more intense as it becomes more and more ridiculous. This is scary. As it becomes more and more ridiculous, the more intense both sides get. Yes. Right.

So what the future holds, I'm not entirely sure, but I like to believe even my current charges, I found solace when I was in jail. That the thinking. People are looking at this going, Something about this doesn't seem right. Well, I mean, it is a little bracing. I mean, when I discovered I mean, I was sympathetic to you already, but a man's accused of human trafficking, it's worth finding out what he's accused of.

And when I discovered that there was no actual human trafficking charge, that's not actually human trafficking, I don't care what you call it, you weren't buying. Even accused of buying and selling anyone, then the next conclusion you inevitably reach is, they don't like the guy, they don't like his views. Fine. They're going to send him to jail for that. That does seem like an escalation.

Absolutely. But if they don't like your views and you're inspiring millions of people to resist slave programming, you become a threat like they discuss me. But you can't send a guy to jail because you disagree with him. You shouldn't. But even before I went to jail, the members of Parliament in the UK were talking about me and what a dangerous role model I am for young boys.

So they launched this initiative inside of British schools to ban me. My name can't be said inside of any British school. And members of Parliament were standing up in Parliament saying, Andrew Tate is dangerous. He's encouraging young boys to have misogynistic views, because I'm literally telling young men to go to the gym and to stand up for themselves and believe believe in themselves and believe in something. And by extension, you look at some of the sexual education books these children are being given, which I believe in age nine, I don't think a child needs to learn about anal sex or any of these things.

Probably not. Yeah, probably not. So they're pushing that to the children, but I'm banned. Well, they're also pushing weed and video games on boys. Oh, completely.

And you can listen to rap music about killing people all day long. And there's a whole and little nas. He can have sex with the devil in his music videos, that's fine. But I'm dangerous for saying, go to the gym. And once I realized what was scary to me is I said this to my brother, I said, Once the Parliament is discussing you, you're basically considered a national security threat at this point.

You're a threat to national security at that level. And then all bets are off. Right. So the UK has become more authoritarian than anywhere in the Persian Gulf. Correct.

How did that happen? Yeah, like I said, it's very interesting because people still the people on Camp B who don't think a lot of them believe that the law is fair. I've had people say to me, oh, yeah, what they're doing to you is garbage. You need a lawyer. Yeah, I do need a lawyer, and I do have a lawyer, thank you.

But it's not that simple, unfortunately, the law is very subjective and if they want to attack you with it, they're going to do a very good job of attacking you with it. And that's what the UK does. The UK have these laws which are extremely subjective, and they can use it as a weapon to basically silence anyone. They decide England is the birthplace of free speech, habeas corpus of kind of framework of liberal democracy that we thought we believed in, and now it's a country where people are arrested for praying. Well, what happened?

Good question. And there's a saying that I heard, and I don't know who said it, but he said that a sick country adopts laws like a dying man will try medicine. And I think that the UK is failing in real time. If you look at it in any metric, whether it's living standards, whether it's crime rate, any any metric, you can measure the success of a country by it's fallen off the cliff, it's becoming more and more expensive to live there. The education system's gone down the pan.

London is the stabbing capital of the world. You're not safe to leave your house. So their answer to this is just more and more and more laws. And unfortunately, as they do that, they're not even intelligent enough to actually attack the people who are doing genuinely bad to the world. They just make more and more authoritarian laws and they end up using them to attack the people that the government doesn't like.

And I ended up being one of them. And I think Europe in general has problems. If you look at France as we speak, I think it's on fire, isn't it? Most of it. It is, yeah.

So they have issues, and their answer, what's a government's solution to anything? Law? What can a government do, no matter what? But they're not laws that are aimed at fixing the problem. That's right.

No, they're laws aimed at fixing the person who's talking about the problems. Why don't you get rid of the guy who tells everybody? Isn't that easier? Tucker, why fix any of this? If we just shut him up, they won't know.

But that's like responding to a heat wave by breaking your thermometer completely. Right, that's the plan. Plan one is to break the thermometer. We might deal with the heat wave a bit later, but get air conditioning. No, we break the thermometer for now.

There's too many people talking about the heat wave, so let's just break that and then later on, maybe when we have time, we'll do something about the actual issue. It does seem like a lot of this is an effort not to talk about the thing, the real thing, in Europe, anyway, which is migration. And the U. K, formerly known as England and France have both been completely changed by people from other countries and I'm sure have added good things, too. I mean, I'm not but they've changed them and in general, they're not better countries, and why can't anyone admit that?

But this is what's really interesting to me about what's happening, because we're talking about masculinity and men who say no and men who stand up. But there has to be balance, right? Everywhere in the world, there has to be power balances. If there's not a balance in power, there's going to be a vacuum, and that's going to be filled. If you neuter the native population of men, if you destroy their mentality to resist, if you tell them that every single thing about the masculine is wrong and you basically feminize and unicate them, turn them into eunuchs and then you import high testosterone men from the Third World who don't believe any of this garbage, who grew up in a society where they understand the only way to succeed is to be a fearsome predator.

To a degree. What do you think is going to happen? Like, who's supposed to protect the sanctity of these nations and these settlements and these towns and villages? The police? No, in general, I would argue that it's the masculine essence that can be detected by the people who arrive.

I guarantee if you were to pick up, put a bunch of these migrants in Sarajevo or Moscow, they behave themselves. I have a feeling they'd just look around and go, not today, but when you knew, or the native populace, then it's like, well, there's a power vacuum. And when there's a power vacuum, what do we expect to happen? What are the French going to do about it? What's your average Englishman going to do about it?

Nothing. And that's the thing. And that makes you wonder, is this purposeful, these two actions of neutering the native populace and importing these high testosterone Third Worlders are so at ODS with each other. Is this purposeful? I'm not sure, but has anyone considered this?

So, yeah, it's interesting because you talk about these are huge and intentional trends. They're historically transformative trends. They're a big deal, so they're probably not happening by accident, right? There's got to be some intent. How could there not be that's right?

And how do they expect all of this to end? And this is exactly what's happening with migration. The problem with migration specifically is that there's no native masculine populace to enforce any degree of culture or boundary or parameter. And like I said, I would argue the point. And I've been to Sarajevo and I've been to Moscow, I've been to these places and I've seen there's a whole bunch of migration and everybody seems to just behave a little bit differently.

And I think that's because people understand did men live here. That men live here. If you turn up in someone's house and their house is pristine, you're probably going to take your cup and you're going to go put it in the kitchen. But if you turn up in somebody's house and it's a fucking mess and nobody respects the house and nobody cares, and the man is drugged out of his mind, half asleep on the couch, what are you going to do with your cup? You're going to leave it there?

You don't give a shit. If you turn up to the Western world looking, then you're going to hit on his wife. Absolutely. So what do we expect to happen in these scenarios? Right.

And it is purposeful and it is scary that even me just telling men to go to the gym is seen as an act of defiance to the point where I have to be punished. I must go to jail, I must be silenced. Thermometer must be broken at the end of all of this, no matter what happens. Do you plan to stay in Romania? I love Romania.

I love this country. And if I am found not guilty, I will stay in Romania. Yeah. I will still stay here. I don't believe in running away.

I also believe, and perhaps this is yeah, I didn't even want to ask you that because legal case pending. But I mean, presumably you're rich enough to run away when you have it. Correct. I'm not going anywhere. I think if I was anywhere in the Western world, this would have happened to me.

I don't think this is Romania's fault, let's put it that way. I don't think this is Romania's fault. I think if I resided in Switzerland or France or Italy, the same thing would have happened. From knowing what I know, I think it was going to happen to me regardless. And I think I do have a large amount of sympathy the especially amongst the Romanian population.

I get thousands of messages a day from Romanians apologizing to me. I think the people here actually like me. My waiter at lunch yesterday is one of them. He wanted you to know. Yeah.

Amazing. This is what I mean. Everyone understands what's happening. My problem is not with Romania. I don't hold any personal grudges against Romania.

I think that this Matrix attack was going to come to me. What is the Matrix? Good question. I guess some Americans call it the deep state, but I like to look at it in a more global way. When I say The Matrix, I think there are certain agendas which are being pushed.

I think the media machine and the judicial systems of the world work together hand in hand. I think the goal is to control people's minds to a point where they don't discuss anything that's important. The reason I use The Matrix is because I've watched that movie a few times, and it has so many similarities. To the have you seen the movie? No.

You've never seen the movie The Matrix? No, I don't watch any movies. I don't want to talk about it on camera. No, I'm very dyslexic, and it's hard for me to watch video. Got it honestly understood.

But there's so many similarities, and the basic premise is that humans minds are controlled and put inside of a false reality so that their body heat can be manifested for the machines. And I don't think it's much different to reality. Our minds are controlled. We're put in a false version of reality. We're told things aren't true.

We're arguing over things that don't matter. We're observing a false version of events. And the goal of it is just to distract us long enough for our bodies to be used for the machines, the soulless. And I think it's pretty similar. Pretty similar.

Striking similarities. And even then, there's a bunch of other similarities which are difficult for me to explain. You haven't watched a movie. But there are agents inside of The Matrix, and the idea of the agent, the purpose of the agent is to make sure that nobody understands how The Matrix really works and to wake anybody's mind up. They want to keep you asleep.

And any person can become an agent at any time. If they're not unplugged, if their mind is not free, they can become an agent. And their job is to keep you asleep. And you see agents all the time. COVID awoken me to agents when I would sit and talk to somebody, and they seemed perfectly rational and normal until I mentioned COVID, and then they'd fully change.

No, it's dangerous. No. What do you mean? What do you mean? Are you crazy?

My grandma got sick, and they became an agent instantly and started repeating the news to me. And I was like, Your grandma got sick? How old is she? 97. Interesting.

Oh, I'd better lock myself in my house then. Dumbass.

Agents exist and the matrix exists. And I think most people's version of the world is a false one. The idea and the world that most people have in their mind and how society functions and how all these things function I genuinely believe is completely false. I think they've all been lied to. I don't think anybody understands how any of the of the world works.

And I try and use some very simple, you know, very simple analogies to wake people up. I said to one of my friends once, I said, if me and you could play video games for $10,000 and you could cheat, would you cheat? He goes, no. I was like, If I was whooping your ass and it was ten grand a game and you could cheat, would you cheat? He goes, yeah.

I was like, all right. So you accept that people cheat to win in a video game for a menial amount of money. Do you think they're not going to cheat for something that matters. Yeah, I think they're not going to cheat for something important. You understand what I'm saying?

How about to get the most important job in the world, president of the United States? I would never kill myself. I mean, people kill each other over insurance fraud. You don't think, right? Yeah.

So when you actually understand how the world really works you know what was really interesting? I remember there was this big military coup. Was it Myanmar or Burma? One of these there was a big military coup like a year ago or something, and nobody really cared. They mentioned on the news a little bit, and I looked at it and I looked into it, and they were talking about how the two political parties were almost 50 50.

And then in the 90s, something changed. And now one political party just smokes the other one. And the military took over to restore democracy and all this stuff. It was very interesting to voting machines they used. Really interesting something to look into a lot of countries like that.

Philippines also true. Why do you think support for the war in Ukraine support for Ukraine side in the war against Russia support for a war against Russia in the west is kind of the bottom line issue for the people who run the US government and for the American media. Why? I guess you could argue about it, but there isn't an argument about it in the United States. There's a position, and anyone who doesn't hold it is attacked and punished.

Why? Why is that so important? Well, the first thing I think we should all do is I think we should all give Putin credit for curing COVID. Right? Because when his invasion happened, COVID went away.

So thought about that. Think about it. It's almost to the day. So we have to give him some credit at least for doing that. He may be the bad guy of the world, but at least he cured COVID for everybody nearly instantly.

Fair. Thank you for thank you, President Putin. Yeah, i, up until this point, never really commented too heavily on politics. Yes. But I understand very well.

I like to believe what's happening with Ukraine and Russia. And what I will say to the people who are watching this at home is that if you are naive enough to believe that there are good guys and bad guys in wars and it's as simple as good, and bad and that the bad guys are crazy and the good guys want freedom, then you need to do a little bit more investigation into what's really happening. And when you look at the vested interest of any country or any person, can I just ask you to pause and just comment? That's the truest thing, what you just said. And anyone who doesn't understand that should shut the fuck up.

And I mean it. Having seen war, anyone who's telling you that it's Churchill versus Hitler is an idiot. Completely. Well, I'll give an example. When my father was still alive excuse me?

Yeah. No, it's true. When my father was still alive, my father died six or seven years ago. I was a lot younger. The war in Afghanistan was going on.

He died six or seven years ago. How old was he? 56. Oh, gosh. Yeah, he died.

But the war in Afghanistan was going on. And I remember asking my dad saying, why do the Taliban even fight and resist the American war machine? They don't stand a chance. Like, why are these terrorists even fighting against the American war machine? And my dad said, they're fighting for their way of life.

They want their wife and they want their children, and they want their society and their language, and they don't want pride flags, and they don't want American bullshit, and they don't want to be told what to do. And they're fighting to be a culture and be a people which is independent in and of itself. Like, they're not the bad guys you think they are. They're people who are like, Why are you here? What do you want?

We don't agree with that. That's against our holy book. Fuck off. Right. So even there's no such thing as good and bad in any war.

Who is your father? My father was a chess master. He worked for the CIA when he was he was a linguist for the CIA. And then he was American. American.

He was discharged and for a story I won't tell. But he was a chess master, and he is very interesting. I encourage people to look at his Twitter. He still has Twitter at Tate. Terrific.

And everything he was talking about eleven years ago is so important now. Eleven years ago, no one cared about we had the Dawn Bass in 2014. People cared a bit, but he was literally he predicted the future. You want to see how chess players can see the future? Read his Twitter.

Everything from LGBTQ, why they need your kids because they can't have their own, to the war that's coming and how Europe's going to have an energy crisis, to the letter all on his Twitter. It's amazing to read it's like he told you could tell the future. Ten years ago, no one talked about any of this stuff. Did he live in the US? Yes.

He lived in America. Fascinating. Yeah, it's crazy. But he was telling me about a lot of this stuff even when I was a lot younger. And as we said, there's no good guys and bad guys.

But when you have a vested interest in something, I think that people are relatively simple. You're talking about why the American government has such a vested interest in this war, which is not good for America. Which is not good for America. So is it well, we can say it's for money or we can say it's for power? What else would it be for?

Is it really for freedom and democracy? Well, I think that's already been destroyed by Zelensky, hasn't it? So what is it for if it's not for money and power? And then you say, well, who is the money and the power going to? These are logical conversations.

It's a very logical thought process. I agree. Wouldn't it be interesting to say, okay, I woke up. I'm an american. I would never kill myself.

I woke up. I'm an american. Why does America care? Well, I guess it's for money or power. There's no other reason.

Okay, well, America wants to be a rich, powerful country. That's fine. Is the money and power going to America, or is it going to a select few individuals? Are those select individuals interested in me, in my life? Do they care about benefiting me?

Do I need to support the power grab of these select few individuals? Is that going to be a smart move for me to make, for me to have the best possible human experience? These are very logical thought process, yes. People don't seem to think anymore. They believe that there's a good guy and there's a bad guy, and one team's completely good, and one team's completely bad, one team's crazy.

They often use the word crazy because to be completely bad, you have to be crazy, right? So you're crazy. He's crazy. Just for no reason. Just reasonless.

Insanity. I don't know if you saw Lukashenko with the BBC. Did you ever see that interview? No. Oh, brother, please watch it.

The way he destroys the BBC. I thought I did the best job, but I take second place. Amazing. But yeah. And you just have to be critically thinking.

And then after you're critically thinking, you have to be brave enough. And this is the real pandemic of the world as cowardice. You have to be brave enough to look around you and realize everything was a trick, everything was a lie. But why not be a coward? It's just a lot easier, right?

Well, it used to be. This is the thing that's interesting. I would actually argue in the 1950s and 60s, if you were to agree with every single narrative and obey every single law and do exactly what you were supposed to do and pay your taxes, et cetera, you'd at least get a wife who respected you. You'd at least have children who go to school without being indoctrinated to a degree. You could have a nice house, you could have a pickup truck.

You could have a pretty good life if you just followed the rules. Yes. I don't think that's true anymore. I think that if you are a man especially and this is what I talk about I talk about masculine issues if you're a man who was born and you decide to do exactly as you're told, you're going to end up depressed, in debt, working a job that you hate with a wife who doesn't respect you, with kids who don't listen to you in a house you don't own until she leads you. And then you contemplate suicide a while.

And maybe you might find some purpose towards the end, enough to survive and pay your taxes. And then you're gone. I don't think a man who just follows the programming is going to find any happiness. But they don't care. Why would they?

They have no interest in masculine happiness, is another thing that's very interesting. They talk about men's mental health all the time, especially in the UK. I'm not sure about America, but in the UK, they had this big drive from men's mental health, saying that men commit more suicides, men a lot more, because it's hard to be a man. We commit more suicides, we're more depressed, we have all these mental health problems. I come along, I genuinely get thousands of emails a day saying I'm helping people men's mental health.

But, no, can't help it. The way Andrew wants. You can't tell him to go to the gym and stand up for themselves and have pride. What kind of man's going to have a solid mentality and not have mental health issues if he has no pride? That's part of being a man.

Part of being a man is proud of yourself. If you wake up and you're not proud of who you are and how you look and the things you say, how you ever going to have a solid mentality? So when I teach things that genuinely help men's mental health, that's outlawed. No, you're not allowed to do that. Instead, you have to take our version, which is to pretend to care about men's mental health, but not give a shit.

Give them a life they know they're not going to enjoy, pay taxes and die. And men are the backbone. Medicate them and medicate them. Medicate them long enough to keep working the same way as we medicate farm animals, bunch of injections. Just keep them alive long enough to get the milk, milk's gone, chop the head off.

Boom. They need to put you in prison. They're trying. Yeah, I can see why they're trying, and it's scary a lot of people. But then what do I do?

Do I just shut up? No. You don't think so? No, you can't shut up. I mean, because in the end, your self respect, your dignity, is the only thing that's right.

And this is what people don't understand. People say, Andrew, why are you fighting this war? And they don't understand that war is certain. You either fight war against injustice and you fight war against the things you know that are wrong and you feel good inside of yourself, or you accept the slave programming and fight a war with your own mind. You have to fight something.

I can shut up and believe what I'm told in the news, but then I won't why am I so unhappy all the time? Why am I depressed? Why does my life suck? Why does my woman ignore me? Why do my children not respect me?

Then you're fighting a war with your own mind. I'd rather have all of me on side and fight against what I know is genuinely evil. You can't escape the battle. The battle is here for all of us. So I've made my decision and that's why I can't be quiet because you just said I would lose my self respect and I'd lose my dignity and I don't think I can function that way as a man and I don't think any man should be able to function without self respect and me?

The reason men died on the Titanic was for self respect and dignity. They went into the icy cold water and died because they would feel honorless if they jumped on the boat and left the women to die. That's right. So when you have self respect and dignity you have a hard parameter and you'll do things that which are deemed crazy or insane because you believe in them and you stick up for yourself and that's why they don't want men to have self respect and dignity. Rather be a free man in your grave.

Absolutely. So I can't be quiet and I'm going to say what I believe is true and I genuinely believe I'm helping the world. I think that any young man who is a follower of mine, I will argue there's no influencer on the planet besides me who is genuinely benefiting their life. I know you're not big on the internet. I look at these other streamers and these other influencers.

They play video games all day, they smoke weed on stream, they talk garbage. It's a bunch of drama back and forth like girls. I'm the only influencer or streamer who's genuinely talking about making money because you need to have money to escape the matrix. It's very hard to resist enslavement when you have to pay the bills. Getting physically strong because a strong body is a strong mind, standing up for yourself, self motivation, all these things.

I'm talking about genuinely positive things. Very few people are. And I think that is an extremely important message that needs to be told and I'm not going to stop doing it because I know I'm genuinely helping the world and they're going to try and punish me for it for the rest of my life. I think this is just beginning and I think when I beat this case, which I believe I will beat, I think something else is going to come. And it's kind of scary because I am a little bit afraid and a little bit intimidated by the incompetence of my enemy because their standardized playbook is now failing in real time.

The standardized playbook is the media attack, the lie and it's not working anymore. And it got me a little bit worried about what the next move is. You used to just be able to lie about guy over the news and you win, right? But now it's like, Shut up. So now what?

I don't know. And that's what's kind of scary in my scenario, because nobody's going to believe any of the crap they print about me. Nobody believes it. Nobody believes it. Whenever I do an interview with the Matrix media, nobody believes they have to turn the comments off because everyone the comments are just ripping them apart.

You do seem very sad. On the verge of killing yourself, are you? Absolutely not. Really not. I never would.

And that's what you said, that I have to keep saying it. I have to keep saying it because it's scary. Right. But I believe you get three lives. I think they cancel you initially, and then when that fails, they try and put you in jail without a reason.

And if that fails, there's only one option left after that. That's right. So I'm in a very scary scenario, but I guess the same as the men on the Titanic just couldn't get on the lifeboat. I just can't stop saying what I believe to be true. If a young man comes to me and says he's depressed, I'm going to tell him how to become a kind of man who's proud of himself.

And if that makes him the kind of person that resists slave and slave programming, I'm always going to be public enemy number one. You've said depression isn't real, or it's not as the way we describe depression isn't accurate. What do you think of depression? When I say depression isn't real, that really upset the world, especially the liberals, because they all live on medication, right? When I say depression isn't real, I'm saying that because I don't believe in things that can take away power from me.

If I believed in depression, I would have been depressed in jail. But I can't be depressed if I don't believe in it. If you don't believe in ghosts, how could you be haunted? You have two people in a haunted house. One believes in ghosts, one doesn't.

There's a knock in the night, one wakes up, calls an exorcist, is terrified, looks for a ghost. The other guy doesn't believe in ghosts, knock in the night, goes back to sleep. It's the belief in the ghost that gives it the power. If I don't believe in depression, I believe in feeling depressed. Sure, we're humans, we have emotions.

Sometimes we feel depressed, sometimes we feel happy. I don't believe in the idea of becoming a depressed person who has depression. I don't believe in that. I don't think that's possible for me. So if I don't believe in it, how can it happen?

I don't believe in depression, so why would I not adopt the mindset that makes me the most capable predator I can possibly be? Why not adopt a mindset that makes me as competent and as fearsome as possible if you've to install software in your own mind, why would I not install software that makes me capable of not only driving a bugatti and flying on private jets, but sitting in a Romanian dungeon covered in cockroaches? I need to be able to do all of it. So why would I believe in something that made me incapable? I don't believe in depression because I think that even the belief in and of itself, when you feel depressed, you'll start to consider, maybe I have depression.

Then you go see a psychiatrist who tells you have depression. Then they want you on pills. It's the belief that goes down the spiral. If I feel sad, I go, I'm depressed today, I'll be fine tomorrow. So why I suspect you're right?

Or what you're saying is pointing toward truth. That's my personal view. But even if I disagree with you, okay, I disagree with you. Why is that so offensive, what you just said? Well, that's what's interesting.

Because when I said depression wasn't real, the number of people who would attack me defending depression, this is why I didn't understand. You say depression isn't real, but depression has ruined my life and it's super real and it's ruined my life and I lost my marriage. I'm like, if I told you it wasn't real, you should be coming to me saying, tell me how it's not real. Please help me with my depression. Why are you trying to convince me that it's real?

Why are you sticking up for it? Why are you defending depression? And why would I adopt the thinking of someone who's sad? You're going to convince me to take your worldview? You just told me your wife left you, you're fat and you want to kill yourself.

And you want me to sit here and go with my perfect life and go, you know what? I want to think like this guy. You're at your mind. I don't believe in it. And because I don't believe in it, it's made me the kind of person who can't become depressed.

And the reason they don't like me attacking that is because depression is a fantastic way to subdue a population, right? If everybody's depressed, it's hard to have a revolution. You're depressed, oh, they've locked us all in our houses. I don't want to go outside anyway, I'm sad, right? So depression is a fantastic tool of population control.

They have no problem with you being depressed. They have a problem with you being the opposite, principled and energetic. No, you don't want principled, energetic people, that's a problem. A bunch of depressed people, easy. If you were to invade a country, would you rather the opposing army be principled and energetic or depressed?

I'll tell you, I would not want to be invaded by a cheerful army. Absolutely scary. They're having too much fun, right? You want them all to be depressed. So a morose army is easier to defeat.

I agree. Absolutely. So depression is a defended idea. You're not allowed to even talk about it. You're not allowed to help people get out of it.

Right. They like the idea of a depressed population. And this is what I say to people now. I'm not stupid. I understand, like, PTSD is real.

I understand mental health is real. I'm not saying that. But I say if you're an 18 year old boy or 18 year old man and your life is pretty much okay, bacteria didn't steal your eyesight, which could have happened. You never had a car crash and lost both of your legs, which could have happened, you're actually very fortunate, and you wake up and you say, I'm depressed. I think you're an idiot.

I don't think you're depressed. I think you've been psyoped. I think you feel a little bit of depression, and you can fix that by changing your life. I think if you became rich and strong and smart and successful and you worked hard and you dedicated yourself and you were motivated and you tried your very, very best to become excellent, you probably wouldn't feel depressed anymore, which means it's not a disease, is it? The only reason you're even saying you have depression is because you believe in it.

So you're arguing for cause and effect. You're saying if you live a certain way, you're going to feel a certain way. Absolutely. And I also would argue that I think we've evolutionarily, even though I do believe in God, I think that we've designed ourselves, and the human has grown into a way where if you feel depressed or sad, I think that's a fantastic trigger or a warning signal to do something. If you were to say to me, andrew, you have to complete this monumental task, you have to conquer the world, I would say, okay, but I need an emotional motivation to do that.

I need to be unhappy having not completed the task. I need to be uncomfortable, right? If you're uncomfortable being out of shape, you'll get in shape. If you're happy being out of shape, then you're just going to stay out of shape, right. So if you feel a degree of uncomfortableness inside of your mind, I think it's just your mind telling you that something about your life needs to change.

Yes. You need to get up and change something. Guys would say to me, I'm depressed because I'm fat and I have no girlfriend. And I'd say, no, you have no girlfriend and you're fat and that's why you're depressed. If you go change those two things, you'd probably be surprised that your disease goes away.

I had another guy said he was going to kill himself. I said, Listen, back when I used to reply to my emails when I was smaller, I said, make me a promise. Get a six pack first of beer. I said, Get a six pack first. Get in fantastic shape.

And then do whatever you want. Didn't want to kill himself once he's in. Fantastic. So he did it? Yeah.

After. Before and after I put him on Twitter. Kind of interesting that, isn't it? So how are we going to say we have this disease, which is cause and effect? How are we going to say we have this disease where there's something wrong with you as a man, you have a disease because your life sucks.

I mean, I don't think that's true. I think that your life just sucks and you should change it. And another thing I also preach, and this is another thing that's very important. I also think as a man, because life as a man is pain and suffering. And when I say that, because you're never going to be a good man or good at being a man without pain and suffering, you're going to have to go through a bunch of shit and have a terrible life to become a good man, I think you should embrace that and accept it.

And I think that the correct mental model for men to have is a degree of stoicism and not to be too concerned with even how they feel. If I woke up today happy, if I woke up today and happy, I would have done this interview with you. If I woke up today sad, I would have done this interview with you. What's the difference? Why put so much importance on my emotion if certain things must be done?

I must work. I must train. I must see Tucker Carlson, I must resist the matrix. I've got things to do. So why are we going to sit around and talk about how I feel if it doesn't even affect how I act?

And as a man, it shouldn't. Because there's too much to do. And the masculine world is hyper competitive. This is another thing most people don't understand. It's hyper competitive out here.

All the women want a few men at the top. The Ferrari. You. You don't want a Ferrari to drive fast. You want a Ferrari because other men want a Ferrari and can't have one.

It's hyper competitive. So if you're competing against every other man for every dollar you make, every girl you see, the house you live in, the car you drive, the life you live, you're not going to be able to compete with the person who performs regardless of how they feel. If you only compete when you feel like competing. Right. Because there's men like me out there who will be sad every day and outcompete you regardless.

I don't care how I feel. I will still win. And that's the kind of mindset you need to adopt. So I don't win. A man come on a job to do.

Stop whining, go to work. Completely. I agree completely. So when men say I feel sad, who cares? The world doesn't care.

All the men who are out here to. Destroy you and take your girl. Don't care. So why do you care? The person who should care least is you.

You're the only person who wakes up every day who should have a genuine vested interest in improving your life. Nobody else wakes up and wants to improve your life, only you. So if nobody else cares about how you feel, why do you care? So my argument also for depression is you're depressed. Fine.

Have you trained today? That doesn't change what you should do with your life, depressed or not. And I don't say this because I'm an eternally happy person, I say this because I've experienced all ranges of human emotion. I was in a Romanian jail cell with cockroaches crawling all over me as I slept. I never missed a day of training.

I wouldn't say I was particularly happy, but push ups must be done, so they got done. You're very close to your brother correct. And you were locked away for part of that with him. Did you have fun at all with him? Yes, I do think there's something inside of men, whereas if you're with your boys or you're with your group of men yes, there's something inside of us.

Totally. And it allows you to make the absolute best of the worst situations. Maybe that's an evolution from war. All the men went to war and you saw all this pain and suffering and you saw heads, people decapitated and you're injured, but then you sit around the campfire and you're laughing, you're laughing. That's right.

It's something inside of us. It's like a coping mechanism when you're around men. So when me and him were together, no matter how bad the scenario or no matter what they tried to do to us, part of us would just look at each other like, cigarette. And you find joy in that. And, yeah, there's definitely and that's another thing I think a lot of men are lacking, a lot of men are missing is a masculine support network.

Buddies. Buddies. You talk to a guy and say, what was the highlight of your life? What was the best time of your life? And they'll say, Ah, college football.

It's not about the football, it's about the team. Yeah. And I think a lot of that's destroyed as well, because also, it's interesting how everything interconnects when you destroy honor and principle and the masculine essence inside of men. Well, now, as a man, it's very hard to have friends. I wouldn't want to have a male friend who had no principles, no honors, and didn't work hard and was always crying about being sad.

What do I want to hang around with him for? He's a loser. Right, so then your support network is destroyed. And I think that men have always needed that since the dawn of time, and I think that's gone. But they don't have friends.

Men, especially middle aged men, have no friends. Absolutely. Because they've been told that to give them all away and do as the wife says. And then she left him. No wonder he wants to kill himself, wouldn't you?

No wonder he's depressed. It sounds like the worst existence ever. And now we're living in a world now especially where everything is hyper competitive, especially the sexual marketplace. Like, if you're a 52 year old, overweight average income, no fame, dude, and you have to find a girl, it's going to be pretty difficult to find a good one. It's going to be very hard.

So of course he's lonely, and then his kids don't respect him. They're busy. Of course he's sad. It's actually heartbreaking to discuss. It is heartbreaking.

It's heartbreaking. But then how do you prevent that happening? Well, then you need to be a man of honor and principle and make sure that you keep your support networks and make sure that your woman does respect you. And a woman's going to respect you when she sees other men respect you. Yes.

And they're only going to respect you if you respect yourself. But to respect yourself, you have to be the kind of person who says no. What do you think of porn? There's been some statistics. There's been some studies done.

Most men or less men are having sex than ever before. I've seen that. Yeah. And that's that well, that's an extension of the fact that masculine virtue is being destroyed. That's the thing that's interesting about all these things.

They psyop, especially men. They say, listen, women want a feminist man. Women want a man with no moral principle who would make sure that there's a conversation about who should fight the burglar when your house is broken into. Because equal opportunities, equal rights, of course, don't presume just because you're a man that you should defend her physically. Of course not.

That makes you a bigot and a misogynist. So they convince men to adopt these virtues in ways, and of course, women by and large dislike them for it. So now, as men's, as masculinity has plummeted, a whole bunch of men are simply not having sex anymore. And then they become addicted to porn, which is cucking effectively. Two people are having sex and you're just watching it.

Good point. And it's become a pandemic. Right. So men are replacing genuine sexual relationships with just the computer screen and porn, and it's becoming a very, very big problem. And that's also exasperated by the fact that I think the sexual marketplace has become globalized.

This is the thing I say to young men. A lot of men come to me with problems, and my only answer to them is masculine excellence. I say that in the world we live in today, being a normal man or below normal is going to be terrible. You have to be an exceptional man, because the sexual marketplace, especially even if you just want to find a wife, is globalized. In 1955, if you met the hot girl in the Nebraskan town.

She was the hot girl in the Nebraskan town. If you meet her today, she's being offered to go to Corsioval and go skiing in France, and she's being offered to fly to Dubai. And there's millionaires who can just fly her anywhere and give her anything she wants. And who are you? It's getting harder and harder as a man to even find the most basic human function of reproduction.

Even to just find a woman you can reproduce with, it's becoming more and more difficult. You also couple that with the fact that they've destroyed morality in women also. So when you destroy the morality in men and you destroy how a man should act, and then you destroy how a woman should act, you're both going in the opposite direction. Most women out there are very happy to share a man who's just rich and famous and they don't care. So if you're the normal guy, there's this rich, famous guy with 30 girls, that's 29 dudes who are lonely and end up watching porn.

And if you have a porn addiction or you have a problem with porn, you have a problem with yourself. Because I guarantee if you were the kind of man you're supposed to be, you would have no time for that and you wouldn't need it. I can confirm that's absolutely not really the case. Yeah. So the fact you even need porn shows, there's a problem with you as a man, because if you were the kind of man you could be, and I genuinely believe that any man can become anything, then you'd have unlimited sexual options and you would have no interest in that.

And I do want to make this clear to the world because there's a bit of a misconception about my story. My father was in the military, and then he left to become a professional chess player. He was a traveling chess player layer. You don't make money with that. My mother and father broke up at age nine.

We moved to England purely because you get more help from the state. I was raised on welfare in Marsh Farm, which is the worst area of the worst town, Luton, with the highest crime rate. I went to a school with a 4% pass rate. Single mother household, effectively started from absolutely nothing, became a kickboxing world champion. Your mother was English.

English, correct. So I started at the absolute lowest echelon of life, and I would like to consider myself pretty somewhere near the top. Now, I've been through absolutely every stage. So when I say to men, you can become anything you want, and my answer to you is masculine excellence, there's no other answer. I can't tell you how to rig the game and cheat the game.

If we're all racing a race and I have a Ferrari and you have a Nissan, I mean, sure, you can get a bit better at driving, but you're probably going to lose. You have to get a better character to play this game of life. So that's why I preach masculine excellence. Because for many of the world's problems today, porn, sexual access, being respected by your peers, making sure that your wife's going to stay with you after the children are born, for a very long time, being happy, anything, it all comes down to who you are as a man. A lot of the answer, the only answer, is masculine excellence.

There's nothing you can do besides hard work. Accept the trauma and pain and suffering and work harder than everyone else around you worked. And that's why porn is a problem. So I will genuinely say to any man out there who finds himself loading up that website, go take a look in the mirror and realize why no one wants to fuck you.

And I said this to guys before. If you were a girl with all the choices she has, would you choose you? Think about it. And if you're honest with yourself, a lot of these guys, if they look in the mirror and go, you know what? No, I wouldn't choose me.

Work out why and do something about it. Absolutely not. Our self accountability, this is something that's also missing. I take accountability for everything in my life. Even going to jail, although it was unfair, although it's a Matrix attack, although it's garbage.

It was my fault. I sat there and go, what did I do wrong? How can I learn from this? Where is my part to play in this? What did I do?

Because my actions are what I have the most control over. I have self accountability for everything. If a woman doesn't want to sleep with me, I don't sit and say, women are this way. Society is that way. I just sit and say, okay, why?

What can I change? So any man who's loading up porn needs to go have a long conversation in the mirror and realize that he's not desirable or as desirable as he should be or could be. I come from absolutely nothing. I'mixed race. My father was black and my mother's white.

So statistically, mixed race, single household, single mother household, bad area. I ticked every box to end up in jail. I ended up in jail for the wrong reason. You fulfilled your destiny. Can't escape statistics.

I ticked every box to be a delinquent, and I refused to be one. I absolutely not refused to be a delinquent. I said, no, that's not who I want to be. I want to be a superhero. And I know the only way to be a superhero is to, one, suffer like Batman did.

His parents died, and two, work hard. What does your mother think? My mother is exceptionally proud of me. She still worries because mothers worry. But even when we were in jail, she said, well, I know you're both strong, so she knows she has men.

She knows she has. That's pretty great. Yeah, of course, I believe especially also I think a man has a duty to his last name. I think we carry the last name. We have a duty to our last name.

I am a tate. I am my father's son. The reason my father so is discussed so heavily is because of my monumental success. I keep him alive via my success. I would love to think my son does the same thing.

They will talk about my son in a way where they're so interested in his life path that I must be discussed by extension. And then I live forever. So I have a duty to tate, I have a duty to my last name. I must perform. And this is what I said to my mother on the phone.

I'm a Tate, it's fine, but the conditions are bad. Yeah, that's life. And even as a man today you're waking up, you want to load up a porn website, you should have respect for your last name and you should sit and say, is this who I am? Is this what I do? A lot of this comes down to the things we discussed at the very beginning self respect, honor, dignity.

Well, you have no dignity. I have too much dignity for that shit. And a lot of these men have no dignity, no self respect. And it's all an extension extends of why they're never going to be who they could be and also what they do to cope with that. And, yeah, porn is a coping mechanism.

What do you think of women? I think women are some of the most powerful people on the planet. Firstly, a lot of the conversations we're having, most people don't understand that women are the gatekeepers and women are the ultimate judges. Women are the ultimate judges, especially of sexual access, right? So when I say that maybe 40% of the letters I got in jail were from women just love letters, perfume on them and kiss kiss marks, and the traditional masculine role is still respected and loved by so many women.

If you were to ask the average woman on the street who hasn't lost her mind what she wants in a man, she would like to be financially provided for, physically protected. I love women. I think they are the most powerful and precious things on the planet. They give life. But I believe that when you love a woman, you should want to protect her and provide for her and take care of her.

I don't believe you love a woman by wanting to do everything she says and cucking to her. I don't believe that because I love women, I should have no standards on what I expect in a woman. I don't think loving women is sitting there going, a woman can do whatever she wants to me and I put up with it. I don't think that's loving women at all. I think loving women is saying, I'm going to be the best man I can be and the only way I'm going to be a good man is with a degree of standard and I'm going to be the best man I can be for you.

And when I say these things, I get attacked for being a misogynist, because how is that? I think misogynist means someone who hates women. Correct. Because I have conversations with women who are let's say I've done some podcasts with women who are very promiscuous and I've explained to them that since the dawn of human time, in every single society across the planet, promiscuity in females has been frowned upon. Yes, that's true.

It hasn't been frowned upon in men, but it has been in women. I explained in a big way, in a big way, in many parts of the world to this day, you can't get married if you're not a virgin. I'm not saying all women should be virgins. I was explaining to her that female promiscuity has always been hated. In every holy book it's disliked.

You've bought into this new think the last ten years and you seem to think it's empowering. And I would argue that it's not empowering. And I sat there and had a conversation with this promiscuous woman and I said to her that she is doing herself a disservice and she's dishonouring herself and she's never going to be happy or fulfilled jumping from bed to bed. And I was told that this makes me misogynistic, because women are empowered and they can make whatever choices they want. And I'm insecure to believe that a woman who slept with 300 men is somehow changed mentally and her ability to bond and love a man has been affected by that.

But it is that's true. Well, unfortunately, you're going to end up in a Romanian jail cell for being a misogyny. No, I mean, I love women and I've seen it and that is true, what you said. The thing that's interesting is that women intrinsically understand this, because if you see a woman dislike another woman, what's the first name she calls her slut. It's the first thing a girl says to a girl she doesn't like it's.

The biggest insult that comes to her mind is that she's promiscuous. Right? So it's interesting, but I've been a call to misogynist for that. And then I've been on the internet for a long time. I've made some jokes, I've made some videos, and people don't understand satire or comedy.

There's one that they keep repeating. I made a joke next to my bed. I had a glock, like many people do, and then I had a knife next to my bed and there was a comedic skit where it said, the girl caught me cheating and she picked up the knife and I slapped out of her hand and say, you still love me. And they cut the bit out where I talked about the girl attacking me with the knife. They just took the bit where I say, slap the knife out of her hand.

You're the boss. DA DA. And they he's a misogynist. He's a misogyny. And it's just taken out of context.

And that's another thing that's happened to me. And I am aware of this. And like I said, I take absolute self accountability. But the way you make jokes and make videos when you get hundred views is very different than the way you would make a joke or make a video when you get millions of views. And when they're trying their best to find that, look at a four hour video and find 3 seconds.

I'll give an example of it where it hurt me. Very recently, I did a podcast where I was discussing corruption. I discussed which country I believe is the most corrupt country in the world. They start a lot of wars. And the answer to that by the person I was discussing it with is, well, you live in Romania.

Romania is corrupt. I said, Romania is corrupt. Correct. But I don't think there's certainly corruption, but they don't start monumental wars which end up in millions of deaths. I would argue that their corruption, because a police man stops me and I can bribe my way out of a parking ticket or a speeding ticket is far less destructive.

So we discussed this at length for hours. They cut out the bit where I said Romania is corrupt and showed it to the judge that kept me in jail. Yeah, that's my problem in a nutshell. Long format content, people will find a little bit, edit it up and try and attack me with it. And that's where this whole misogynistic thing has come from.

It's either from me arguing with promiscuous women on podcasts designed for promiscuous women to argue their point and I destroy them so flawlessly I'm a bad person, or something taken out of context. And it's insane because like I said, the amount of support I get from women is actually monumental. The amount of mothers who write to me and say that their son's doing better than ever, the amount of women who write to me and say that their boyfriend's doing better than ever, the amount of women who love me and just want to meet me. This idea that I'm hated by women is probably the biggest lie about this whole story. I don't want to brag, but I can assure the world that's absolutely not true.

I had thousands of letters of support from women. In fact, there was one girl, never met her. She would play love songs from her car outside the jail. So she'd put the music on and play love songs. And I managed to tweet out, via my cousin, the songs I wanted to listen to.

White snake. Is this love? And she'd play them for me. Never met her. Don't know who she is.

So you're in a Romanian prison cell requesting White Snake on the radio in the car outside. Correct. And some girl would pull up and put kind of a surreal moment, put her speakers on full and play me my love songs for a good, like, three or four minutes for the police would come and make her move. But I got a song a day. But, yeah, this idea that I'm universally hated by women is insanity.

That's not true. So you said you're a mixed race. Your dad was black, your mom was not, was white. English, what do you make of the race conversation in the United States? I think it's deliberately they're trying to put fuel on the fire and they're deliberately trying to accelerate division.

This is what I believe. I think that if a black billionaire and a white billionaire meet somewhere, I don't think there's much conversation about race. No. I don't think there's any racism. Interesting.

They're not that interested in the topic, actually. They don't care. Right. But amongst the lower echelons of the populace, they seem very interested in trying to turn us all on each other. Yes, I wonder why that is.

And I wonder why they deliberately make laws and push media matters which are designed to do exactly that. I wonder why that is. We can sit and I have my own theories, but I think what certain people in the world would be most afraid of is the white people of a certain economic class and the black people of a certain economic class shaking hands and saying, this is bullshit. I think that would be very intimidating for them. So it's certainly accelerated.

And it's also very interesting because as a mixed race person, I will also sit and state I don't look particularly black. Most people can't guess where I'm from. I've had more discrimination against me for being a straight male than I've ever had for my skin color. I've had more people look at me or have problems with me purely because of my sexual orientation and my generally masculine essence than I've ever had anybody say anything about my skin color ever. And I'll also say, if somebody has a real problem with my skin color, who cares?

If someone's that ignorant, who gives a shit? I do find it amazing they managed to psyop people into being so brutally offended by it. If someone would come up to me and say, you're not white, I say, Correct. Have a nice day. Who cares?

It's amazing how they've got everyone wrapped up in this. But, yeah, it's certainly accelerated. And another thing that's very interesting about it, especially in America, a lot of Americans are insulated to, I feel like, world history. Yeah, I've noticed. You know, they're like, oh, slavery, slavery, slavery.

Slavery was everywhere. Every country had slaves. Arabs had slaves, chinese had slaves, aztecs had slaves. Everybody had slaves. The American Indians had slaves.

Everybody did. Correct. And they're like, oh, we've been enslaved. Everyone was enslaved. Unfortunately, the world wasn't such a nice place, right?

And there's been ethnic divisions in every single country on Earth since the dawn of time. There still is in many countries in the world today. They believe this is a uniquely American issue. And I would strongly argue that, one, is completely, utterly naught, and two, I think that if you are black, white, Asian, I think if you stand up, self respect, work hard, try your best, turn up on time, firm handshake, don't make excuses for anything, don't look for an easy way out. No matter what your skin color is in America or England or any other Western nation, I think you can be extremely successful.

I don't think anything's stopping you. That's not the message you get from, say, Kamala Harris, who's also mixed race. Her dad was Jamaican, her mom was Indian, but race is really at the center of her identity and her politics. What do you make of, say, Kamala Harris? Well, let's let's look at why they purport the idea that depression is so powerful and that you can just catch it from the sky, and now you're permanently depressed no matter what happens to you, and there's nothing you can do about it, and you can't improve your life and you can't be a better person.

Right. It's that self limiting belief. I think by also pushing this racism argument, it's also very much the same thing. I think if you adopt that mindset, if you wake up and you're a particular color, you're purple and you believe purple people can't make it, what's your chance of making it? Zero.

Yeah, right. So that's what's so destructive about it. This is why I'll even argue when I argue this point with people and they try and say, oh, but this happens. And they pull out these statistics and all this garbage from The Matrix. I say, Listen, even if the world's racist against purple people, the best thing you can do is be such an exceptional purple person that they need you.

They need you. The only answer is hard work. The only answer is self accountability, masculine essence, honor, dignity, making your ancestors proud of you because you hold the same last name as them. The answer is the same regardless, anyway. But when people at Kamala or Kamala are pushing this racism agenda, they're trying to say to people, effectively, you'll never be anything, and you don't stand a chance of ever being anything.

And I think that that makes people who aren't anything feel a little bit better about themselves. It's Cope and that's the only fans she has left are losers who she's told it's okay to be a loser because there's no way you could have not been a loser. And I will argue you could have been something a lot more than that, and you shouldn't listen to anybody who tells you not to be a loser. If someone were to come to me and say, andrew, you're a mixed race. You're from a single mother household.

You're never going to be rich, I'll say, Watch me. I don't believe you. I don't believe you. Who are you? So everything she's saying is, one, wrong.

Two, it's destructive to believe in three. I think it's her last hope at having any kind of fan at all, because she's largely incompetent. I don't think I've ever heard her put a compenduous, coherent sentence together.

And perhaps also, maybe that's the reason why she leans so heavily on race, because she's not impressive or competent. So she can say, oh, but I'm this color and I did it, instead of actually talking about how good of a job she's doing. Because if you have to discuss that part of her career or that part of her current life path, I think she'd be in a lot of trouble. I want to show you video of Joe Biden's challenger for the Democratic primary. Robert F.

Kennedy, Jr.

Runner. Runner. Runner. Run it.

So let's go, let's go, let's go.

Up.

What do you think of him? I think a strong body is a strong mind. I don't think there's anything wrong with the man exercising all until up until the age he dies. Why wouldn't he? I think that the bottom line of masculinity since the dawn of human time has been a propensity and a capability for violence.

I think that's what makes a man a man. I don't see any possible negative connotation with being in good physical shape. I think that's a fantastic way to show discipline, which is very important in any man who's important, especially a world leader. In fact, I love the idea of an elected world leader being in fantastic physical shape. I think it shows that they're a motivated, disciplined person, and I have a lot of respect for them for that.

And I think that in the military, we make it mandatory, right, to be in fantastic physical condition? Yes. So why wouldn't we have it mandatory for people who are in charge of the entire world? I think it's fantastic. The President of the United States seems to be failing physically.

As you look back at the country whose passport you hold at the President, what's your reaction? Well, sometimes, and it's not very often, I consider myself ignorant, but I feel like there must be some magic I missed, because wasn't he the most voted for president in history? Oh, yeah. Billions of votes. Yeah.

There must be some magic I just can't detect. Tucker, I don't want to more than Barack Obama. 81 million votes. It's insane. And I mean Barack.

Yeah, sure. He was very intelligent, articulate. He was concise and compenduous with his ideas. He could make you understand how he thinks. Yes.

But Joe must be better in some way. I can't seem to see how and I guess the fault. Is with me. I don't know what to say about that one. It's one of those lies that's so ridiculous that you're just like, okay, he got more votes than Barack Obama.

Shut up. He did. Shut up.

Excuse me, I want to get your take. This is sort of small ball, but I think tells you something about a largest trend in the United States. This is a state senator from the state of Wisconsin in a public hearing recently saying in a discussion on a crime bill, fuck the suburbs. Here she is. Fuck the suburbs because they don't know a goddamn thing about how life is in the city.

What is that? There's a hostility there. Where does that come from? That comes from being a perpetual victim. That comes from being told that everything that's happening to her is not her fault and she has no self accountability.

Even though she's managed to become a senator, somehow, she's still oppressed. And that means that everyone else who looks like her is also completely and utterly oppressed. And anybody who has a slightly better life in any way is, by extension, a bad person because they weren't oppressed. Yes, and that's where the hate comes from. The division is put there by these mindsets which are being purported by the people in charge of the world, convincing you that you have no control at all over your own life.

And that's why she's so resentful towards people who have done well in life, not even as well as her. I would also argue, perhaps I'm incorrect, that she probably lives in a suburb. Of course she does. So she's a hypocrite on top of that. But hypocrites are the fantastic thing about being a hypocrite is if you're a hypocrite with a little bit of power or influence, you're allowed to be a hypocrite because you're spreading information on the larger problem.

In fact, this is actually interesting. One of my funnest things. I'm going to announce this here on your show for everyone to know. This is a world exclusive. I want to become a climate change activist because when I was younger, people would say, what do you want to be when you grow up?

Do you want to be a fireman? You want to be Batman? Et cetera. And I wasn't sure what would really make me happy, but now I'm ultra wealthy, and I fly around on private jets all the time. I think that now is the time for me to become one of those hypocritical climate change actors.

100%. It's going to be super fun. Well, as your carbon footprint grows, your concern about carbon footprints grows. Absolutely. Eat the bugs.

Sell your car. How dare you eat meat on my jet? Of course I have meat, but I'm allowed to be a hypocrite because I'm spreading awareness for the overall pump for the greater good. For the greater good. I have to get to the climate change activist meetings, which happened to be in Switzerland.

I noticed, of course, although I'm flying on well, before this arrest, they're never in New Jersey. Never. So before this arrest, I was on about three or four jets a week, but every single time I was flying on my private plane, I was extremely concerned about the carbon footprint. Of course you were. And so I am now a climate change activist.

I just want to let the whole world know, because once you get to a certain level of power, of influence, you're absolutely not allowed to be a complete hypocrite. So you're allowed to live in the suburb and then tell everyone, fuck the suburbs and pretend that you're oppressed when you're a centerer of the most powerful nation on the planet because it's a logic fail on every level. So one of the human activities has got to produce the greatest carbon footprint is I would think war, right? I would think diesel powered machines, munitions going off. So I was a little bit surprised to see Greta Thunberg with Zelensky this morning.

What's interesting to me is this. Firstly, I would never kill myself. Secondly, imagine these people are so detached from reality. Imagine going, you know what we need to do, brainwave? We need to drum up support for this garbage.

Let's take the the most loved woman, Greta, and the most loved man, Zelensky. Let's make them meet. Think about the PR. Let's bring a camera and imagine people sitting around a table going, that's great. That's going to really make people support this.

Who gives a fuck? I don't want to swear, I'm sorry, but some young girl turns up to a war zone who has nothing. Why is she there? What are they going to talk about? I don't know, but what's their conversation?

I think she only yells. I don't think she does talk. I don't understand. Is she going to talk about how the childhood has been stolen from all those million Ukrainian men who have been blown to pieces? Like, she talks about childhood being stolen because we drive cars.

I don't think she is. I don't think she's going to mention that. Is it just a big PR opportunity? Like, what PR team came up with this concoction and thought, this will keep them on side? It's mind bending to me.

Who even thought this was a good idea? It's crazy. But of course somebody did. Somebody thought it was a fantastic idea. Have you ever met Greta thinberg.

No, but me and her have had some internet arguments. I think you went to prison for it, right? Yeah, correct. Which is amazing because I'm a climate change activist, so I'm on her team. I was in Sweden during COVID so we could have met.

She didn't want to hang out with me, unfortunately. And then now I'm flying around on my jet everywhere, spreading news about climate change. Same thing like in my Bugatti, obviously. It's got a big engine I make sure to talk about climate change out the windows as I drive. But I'm on her side.

She doesn't seem to be. Yell at the serfs as you pass about climate change. Yeah, don't eat meat, eat the bugs. What's wrong with you people? You don't care about the earth.

If you don't start caring about climate change all those politicians with beachfront property are going to lose their houses. Yes. And they're very concerned about climate change which is why they bought their houses on the beachfront. So they can be the first to let you know it's coming. The early warning system.

Right. They're very concerned. That's why they want to be right there on the beach. Quite honorable if you think about it. Kind of on the front lines.

The climate cris absolutely lead from the front. So good.

But one more point about this story. Sorry to go on and on. Oh I love it. But when I say these things, people, you don't care about the environment. And I try and explain to them I love nature.

You love hunting, fishing. You love nature. I love nature passionately. The problem with all of these things is not that I don't like nature. The problem is that nearly any issue which appears to be virtuous on the planet today is Trojan horsed with garbage.

That's the problem. I have no problem with fixing or maintaining or preserving nature. I have a problem with them telling me I have to maintain nature. Them Trojan horsing my bankruptcy into the middle of it, knowing that nature won't be fixed, then telling me it's about nature and telling me I should agree with it. That's my problem.

There's nothing left on the planet, no issue which isn't Trojan horsed with absolute garbage. And if you're going to sit there and tell me that I need to give more money to the government to stop the sun from being hot, I'm going to argue with you that I'd rather keep my money, thank you very much. Yes. So this is a problem with all these issues. It's nearly anything when I argue against some people.

You don't care about the issue. I do. But you're not smart enough to understand that the legislation around this issue is so large hasn't even been read by most of the people voting for it. And there's something in the middle of it which is going to damage every single person's life, which has nothing at all to do with the issue itself. And most people don't understand that.

They coopt people's best instincts, their love of nature, which is a virtue of course, their love of their neighbors during COVID Don't you care about your neighbors? Oh completely. You do? And your grandparents? I revere my grandparents.

Of course. And you're a bad person if you resist. I was a terrible person for going to Sweden. You're a very bad person. You don't care about anyone else.

And that's how they do. It's weaponized virtue and my opposers every single virtuous thing that comes out of their mouth is never from a place of virtue. It's from a place of hate. Yes, it's weaponized. And also and I don't talk about this very often, but people can go right now to Tatepepepledge.com.

I donate $25 million a year to feeding children in war torn countries, especially in the Islamic world, because that's where a lot of the war is. Nobody ever mentions that, ever. No mentions any of the charitable work I do. Nobody mentions any of the lives I save. Nobody mentions any of the people who support me.

They don't mention anything at all. They just come along and say, you're a bad person. I say, well, if I'm a bad person, let's talk about the things you've done to genuinely benefit humanity besides sit on Twitter and talk shit. Have you ever done anything for anybody ever? Are you capable of doing anything?

Because the things that make me a bad person, right? You don't like me for my principles and the fact I stand up for myself, and the fact I have parameters, and I say, no. Everything you hate about me, those are the things that allow me to even do good in the world. If I was like you, mush goo, I couldn't even help anyone. If you had to help someone today, how could you even do it?

You're broke and you're lazy and you're stupid. You can't even enlighten anybody. You can just spread hate. How is that helping the world? These people are a net negative, genuinely.

And that's what's so crazy about being attacked for your morality, like I'm being now. And when you're a good person, in general, they attack your morality, because the people who are attacking you are absolutely not immoral the ultimate hypocriticism, ultimate even more than my private jet climate change stance. So it's certainly unique. I do like to believe, though, we're entering a new stage of consciousness. I do like to believe at least from ten to 15 years ago, more people are I think COVID woke some people up.

I do like to believe the MSM credibility is tanking in real time. Trump helped massively fake news. Two words before Trump. When did you ever hear fake news? I didn't really hear it that often.

Yeah, fake news, fake news, fake news. And he did a fantastic job of that, and he's starting to wake people up. So I'd like to believe there's a degree of us winning, but I just want to make it very clear to the people who attack me and the people who attack anybody who stands up for what they believe in. A lot of their virtue their virtue, their virtue signaling is just hate pedaling. And when they can't call you unsuccessful and they can't call you stupid, they have to find a way to hurt you.

And the only way they can do that is to say you're a bad person. I've noticed. Yes, I have. So here's Joe Biden expressing his concern about how Putin is doing in the war in Iraq. Interesting, hard to tell, but he's clearly losing the war in Iraq.

He's losing the war at home, and he is coming to the fly around the world. Do you think Putin is losing the war in Iraq? I don't think he's losing the war in Iraq. I don't think he's fighting the war in Iraq. Okay.

He also said he's losing the war at home. I don't think he's fighting in Russia, and I'm also not sure he's losing. So it's pretty interesting statement on many levels. It's scary. It's a joke, but it's scary because I would never kill myself.

But I think the reason he was put into office is because he's incompetent. Yes. Because that makes him easy to control and influence. That's what's most scary. It's not scary that he's become incompetent in office.

It's that they looked at him and goes, that's who we need, that guy. That's what's most scary to me. Does it surprise you that the weakest president is also the most destructive? Weak men are always destructive because hurt people. Hurt people?

Yeah. Someone said that to me a long time ago. Hurt people. Hurt people. They were talking about a relationship, and I said, that's true.

If your heart's been broken, you're probably going to be a bit of an asshole and break someone's heart. Hurt people. Hurt people. And then I thought, well, if you're a weak command and you're going through life and you don't have the strength and resilience to resist the trials and tribulations of being a man, and you're constantly hurt by everything, and you're constantly upset and depressed and sad because you're weak, how could you possibly do good? Hurt people.

Hurt people. Right. To do good, you have to be a good person to begin with and to be a good person, you're virtuous, and you've gone through a lot of things that made you strong. This is what's mind bending to me. That the idea that strong men are somehow bad.

And it's the ultimate hypocrisy. Because as soon as something happens, especially physically, as soon as liberals attacked, they call the police. Defund the police. Call the police. Don't be masculine police officer.

They want a big, strong man with a gun. Guns are bad. They want him to have one. Right? So the ultimate hypocrisy on every level is absolutely gnarly, insane.

At the base realities of humanity, the absolute base reality, strength in men is respected and wanted. And I think that the closer you get to unfortunate circumstance, the closer you get to reality. They go hand in hand, and then everyone's looking for the strong men. So strong men should always lead, I believe. And for a longest period of human time, that's how society functioned.

The strongest men led. But in the Western world now, that doesn't seem to be the case anymore. And weak men are emotionally led. They're not particularly stoic, they are impulsive. And I would say that the most heinous acts, perhaps that happen in modern society today are purported and committed by weak men.

I don't think a school shooter is a strong man. I think it's a weak man. I think it's a man who's been picked on, got butthurt, is upset, girls don't like him, never learnt any emotional control. He's the kind of person who does exactly what the TV tells him to do act out your feelings, cry when you want to cry. Well, now he's angry.

So now what? You told him to act out his feelings. What do you expect him to do? I think that weak men do the worst things. I think weak men hurt women.

I think weak men rob stores because they don't want to wake up and work hard and go to work and do it the honorable way. It's a weak man who goes and steals. It's a weak man who beats the shit out of a girl. It's a weak man or school who shoots up a school. This is all weak men stuff.

And society as a whole is telling men to be weaker and weaker. Saying it's somehow the solution to everything. Because being a man is toxically masculine. Being a strong man is bad. It's toxically masculine.

To be a good man, you have to be a very weak one. Well, look at the most heinous acts that are committed in society. Show me a strong, honorable, virtuous man of principle who's doing any of this stuff. So weak men commit the atrocities in this world? Absolutely they do.

And it's weak men who also attack anybody of virtue. Because I think when you're weak, you're intrinsically unhappy. I don't think as a man you can be happy if you're weak. I think happiness and strength go hand in hand. Yes.

I think that's how we're supposed to be, right? Even strength of mind, strength of conviction, strength of something. If you're weak, you're going to be miserable. So I do find satisfaction in the fact that most of the men who truly dislike me are miserable and weak. And also, like I said earlier about women being gatekeepers, women are fantastic.

Women are a fantastic they're like a barometer for society. I would say you can measure the strength of a society or the virtue of a society, or how decayed a society is largely by the actions of many women. I'd like to argue that point. I can argue that point in many different ways. But women really want their man to be strong.

Of course they will punish you for being weak. And I'm not saying you can never cry to your woman. I'm not saying you can never open up to your woman. But there's going to become a time where she expects you to just be capable. There's a problem.

And even if you don't know how to fix it, your job as a man is to say, I'll handle it. Even if you have no money and no hope and to go and find a way to fix the problem. If you're weak and go I don't know, I don't know, she becomes very resentful towards you and she'll punish you for that, that weakness. And I think what she's trying to do on an evolutionary standard is inspire you to man up, because it's your job to protect her, isn't it? Of course.

So if she sees you and looks at you and doesn't see you as a man who could protect her, she can't respect you. So every survey of female happiness in the west shows just in a straight decline since about 970 till now. Women are becoming less happy in the west. I think it's very obvious what accounts for that. How can you be happy when all the men around you aren't men?

Right. We are the most beautiful union that God has possibly created on the planet. A feminine woman and a masculine man. It's the most beautiful union that can possibly exist. It raises children the best.

Both parties are happier, both parties gain. It's a net positive for everybody. There's no negative, there's no downside. But if you destroy one side of the equation, then the other side is going to be completely and utterly miserable and unhappy. How, as a woman, can you be happy if you can't find a man who you believe can protect you, provide for you, sticks up for you, has morals, has principles?

There's none of those men left. So then what they do is just go from man to man trying to find it. And by the time they've been through enough men to maybe find someone semi close to it, they've been through too many men to ever be happy. And then you have the absolute destruction of Western society. We talk about why men don't get married anymore.

I can tell you why I wouldn't want to get married in America. I don't see the point in being married to a woman who's had so many partners before me that she can't properly pair bond with me and then giving her the opportunity to financially destroy me. I think that would be a bad chess move. And I do believe in marriage. I think society would be better if everyone was married.

I'm saying that if you're living in an immoral society, being a moral person, if you're not careful about it, you can get wrecked. If the game is rigged, you'd be very careful if you play it. So how do we encourage men to get married? Well, they need to be worth marrying, but so do the women, right? So everything's decaying on both sides.

Everything's spiraling. One of the reasons I also got called misogynistic, and I'll say it here, I argue the point that for the longest period of human time evolutionarily, women had to adopt and find a way to take the ethos of an opposing tribe perhaps quicker than a man could. Because of war. If the men would fight and a tribe lost and the women survived, they had to change how they thought to fit in with the new tribe to survive. Yeah, because they'd be carried off.

Because they'd be carried off. Of course. Like the French women were sleeping with Nazis. Towards the end of it, towards the end of Paris occupation, all the French women were sleeping with Nazis. When the Nazis got kicked out, the French women had all had their heads shaved because they got caught hanging around with German soldiers.

The German soldiers killed their husband three years later. They need to eat. Do German soldiers have a wage? He's handsome. It's amazing how quickly they can adapt, and that's for their own survival.

That's fantastic. But then if you extrapolate out and you understand that to be true, then you also understand that women are more susceptible to programming. To a degree. I got called misogynistic by saying that if you sit 100 men and 100 women down in front of propaganda, I believe that women are more likely to believe a lot of that. I think a lot of liberals are female.

They're more emotional, and it's easier to convince them of something if you use an emotionally led argument. Right. So if by extension, you now have women who are emotionally led, who are being convinced, and their logic is failing because they're being tricked with an emotionally led argument, and the man they're meeting has no principle and no honor, and he can't resist that. She's in charge of the house. Well, now she's telling the man what to do.

Right. If I would have come home during COVID and my woman said, you need to wear a mask, I'd say, no, I don't. End of conversation. Or if I was a synth, you need to wear a mask. Okay, baby.

All right. So the women are also largely in charge of the psy op because the men are so desperate to get any kind of connection with a real person and avoid the porn screen. And then these women are being controlled by the mass media as a whole. I say this to I have children. I don't talk about it often, but I say it to the mothers of my children.

I say, look, either we program their minds or society does. Who do you believe in? Everyone is being programmed by somebody in something me, you, everybody. We're all programmed by someone. To sit and think you're above programming is incorrect.

What you have to do is sit and say, does the person who's programming genuinely have my best interests at heart? What do they want me to believe? Why do they want me to believe it? What happens if I believe what they want me to believe? Where does this lead?

That's all we can do. We're all programmed. We're all the sum of the five people we spend the most time with, right? So if you have women with no father, no strong, masculine influence, who's programming them? The kardashians and the news, the internet, porn stars, what kind of woman's that going to be?

And then if a man finally ends up with her and he has no backbone, what kind of man is he going to be? I don't want to comment on these things because I don't want to make personal enemies of people I don't know. There's a guy called Adam, 22. Once again, I have no idea who this man is. I just saw on Twitter yesterday that he was with a porn star who'd never done a male scene.

They got married, and like, a week after their marriage, she did her first male scene with some random dude and he's on a podcast defending it, but his wife had sex with somebody else. Correct. Why? This is the level you can but this is what The Matrix wants from you as a man. They want the woman in charge and the man below with no backbone, because if the woman's in charge, they can emotionally affect her.

They can scare her. You can scare a woman easier than you can scare a man. A man, a real man's, hard to scare a woman. You can make afraid of the vaccine, right? Be afraid, COVID be scared.

If she's in charge of the household, I would argue in nearly any household where the female was dominant, everyone's vaccinated. I would argue that point hard, of course, maybe I'm wrong, but I would argue it. I don't have the statistics. It's just logic to me. So talk about women being unhappy.

What's actually interesting about the female mind, once again, they're going to call me a misogynist is that when you're an emotionally led person, you're more prone to chaos. It takes real stoicism to lead. So why are these women unhappy? Because no one's leading them. No fathers, no man of no backbone, no man they respect.

So they're relying on society, which is promoting chaos and their own mental state. Women will say all the time, my period was coming up, so I was crazy. They'll say that themselves. So without any kind of hard rock of emotional security, to give her a hug and say, don't worry, baby, calm down. It's okay.

When you have no hard rock of emotional security and you leave her to her own devices, she's going to be, to a degree, chaotic. And you know who told me this? A woman said this to me. A woman said this to me. A woman said, most women are closer to her mental breakdown than you possibly believe.

Day by day, I was like, really? She goes, yeah. And that's what I love about my husband. He makes me feel happy and secure and safe. If I'm starting to have a problem.

I know. I go to him and he makes me feel safe. He's my rock. There's a woman said this to me a long time ago. Yes.

So why are women miserable? Because where are they going to get their happiness from? Where they're going to get their emotional stability from? It's not their job. I don't believe it's a woman's job to be emotionally stable.

It's a woman's job to do many other very important things that men can't do. More important, they're better than men at a lot of things, women are, but it's our job to be emotionally stable. Women are better than us at certain things are better other things. And that's why, as a team, we're so powerful to sit and pretend we're all the same the whole way through. Then why do we even need each other anymore?

Well, I don't think we do. You're exactly it. And this is why we have birth rates declining porn, women who are running around sharing one man with no intention of having children. Marriage is gone. Where do we think this is going to end?

And what's interesting about it ends with the training thing. Right? Completely. Yeah, that's the old no, I'm serious, though. If there's no scrambling the idea of the gender binary of sex differences, that is kind of the end point.

Well, the end point is, yeah, men are the same as women, so it doesn't even matter. Right? I can be a woman today, be a man tomorrow. None of it matters anymore. I also think a large part of this transsexual movement, I think a large part of it is a deliberate attack on us and our senses because they're trying to convince us to ignore our eyes.

I do believe that is a bottom line. I think the bottom line of slavery are your own senses. Like, no matter what I'm told that it's cold outside, I feel warm. That's the bottom line. So once they can convince you that your senses are wrong, well, then you're completely open for the slave program.

Once you can look at something with your eyes and ignore your eyes, you're a prime candidate. So I think a lot of this has also something to do with that. You are going to say that's a girl. That's what you are going to say because you have to. And if you say it long enough, you'll think it.

And if you won't, your children will. Because we'll tell them eventually you're going to say it. Then it becomes true. Then you ignore your eyes. Now you believe anything, right?

So the next thing comes along. Now you'll believe all the people on the jets tell you about climate change. It's all an attack on the senses.

This is America's most famous admiral. It's such an important issue for our youth and adults. As you said, some of these laws are actually extending into adulthood. We often say that gender affirming care is. Health care.

Gender affirming care is mental health care and gender affirming care is literally suicide prevention care. Would that be your view as well? I 100% agree. I want to actually genuinely give my heartfelt condolences to any young person who falls for this crap, because you're going to be so miserable for the rest of your life if you chop off your genitals, take a whole bunch of chemicals as a teenager, you are going to be miserable for the rest of your life. Yes.

You're never going to be the person you want to be. You're never going to be accepted as that person. You're never going to feel happy in side. If you fall for this, I genuinely feel sorry for you. That's the first thing I'm going to say.

The second thing I'm going to say I find it very interesting that the only surgery we call affirming is gender surgery. Imagine a girl woke up and said, I was born in the wrong body because my tits are small. I'm a big titted woman, but I was born in the wrong body. I need a tit affirming care. I need to affirm my true body shape, otherwise I have a mental health problem.

No, it's plastic, it looks good, perhaps, whatever. But we would never say she was born in the wrong body and we had to affirm her genuine body experience. Her triple DS. Yeah, her triple D's had to be affirmed. It's garbage.

You're not affirming anything. And also, I think it's kind of interesting, they say that trans people commit suicide at higher rate. That's sad. Nobody should kill themselves. I would hate for anybody to kill themselves.

They say that's because they're picked on for being trans. I don't know why anyone's ever had the argument that perhaps they have a mental instability before this trans stuff and that's why they're more prone to suicide in the first place. Seems like an obvious explanation. Seems like an obvious explanation. I don't think it's normal for anybody to want to mutilate themselves.

I think if someone were to come to me and say, I really want to cut my hand off, I would think they had a mental illness. Why? Don't like it? What do you mean you don't like it? I don't like my hand.

I don't want it. I would think that's very concerning. So I really, truly feel sorry for any young people who fall for this. I don't blame them. I think it's a massive psyop and I think if you fall for it, you're going to be miserable forever.

And one more point I'll make on this whole thing I found very interesting. I'm a professional fighter, so I spent a lot of time in Thailand when I was fighting. Kickboxing is big over there and I've always thought no one's ever mentioned that Thailand has a bunch of lady boys, right? But if you say to a lady boy, are you a man or a woman. She goes, I'm a lady boy.

What's that? I'm a man, but I'm a lady boy. They don't see themselves as women in the real sense of I am female. They don't want to compete against women in sports. They don't want to pretend they can have kids.

They don't talk about having periods. They're like, I'm a lady boy. It's like, kind of like in between. It's got its own thing. India has the same yeah, it's fine.

Nobody over there is genuinely arguing that they are actually female. Only in America are we doing that. And that's what's the craziest thing of all. Even if you truly, truly believe you need to change gender, and you truly believe it's the right path for you, and you believe you're not being Psyoped, and you believe you're going to be happy and you believe you need to mutilate yourself, that's all fine. But then to come along with the hubris and arrogance to tell me that I have to pretend you're something you're not biologically that's right.

That's absolutely not really arrogant. You can't tell me what I have to call you, right? I'm allowed to come to my own conclusions and opinions. And the whole point of being a human is that we've gone through life long enough to identify patterns. Imagine humans didn't identify patterns.

One person went and got ate by the lion. You watch it happen, then you go for a turn like, no, you work out over time. Don't go near the lion, right? If I look at a person who's six foot four, muscularly, built, with a big jaw and a beard, my brain and my life experience tells me that's quite often a man very often it is very often. That's the conclusion I've come to, to come along and say no, because I've decided to do X-Y-Z.

You have to ignore all of the patterns you've identified throughout your entire life and everything you believe to be true. You have to throw away all the science and your entire worldview and everything about how you view the world. You have to eject that from your brain and call me what I want to be called is extremely arrogant. And if I went through the world and said everyone had to call me King Andrew, they'd tell me, Shut up. Why?

If they can get called whatever they want, I should be able to get called whatever I want. I want to be King Andrew, number one savior of Earth, climate change activist. That's what I want to be. And if anybody calls me anything else, they're a bigot. That's what we're going to do.

We're going to go down that path. I'm going to make sure that my title is good. Lord of all lands of lord of all beasts of the land and fishes in the sea, the most honorable man who's ever lived, the fastest human alive. Who cares? Doesn't matter that I can't run fastest.

It doesn't matter, Tucker. I'm the fastest human alive. You must affirm my belief. I'm the fastest man alive. Greatest man in show business.

Sorry, Tucker. Best political commentator there's ever been. Let's just go down this path of insanity. Why not walk around with stickers on our head? Be great, be fun.

The scariest thing about all this stuff is that the world is still polarized to a degree, because there are certain places in the world which are too close to baseline reality for survival for any of this garbage to fly. You think you can go to Tajikistan where people are trying to eat and talk to them about gender and all this garbage? They'll be like, Listen, you're a man. This needs doing. Shut up.

Right? There's no time for any of that. So, as the Western world is self destroying, is self destructing in real time, there are places in the world where none of this crap is happening. So who's going to own the world in 100, 200 years? It's still competitive to a degree.

It's still bipolar. There's two sides to the world. I think that when men are men and women are women, and we stop arguing about dumb shit, that society overall is more competitive. I don't know how America is going to maintain its influence over the entire planet when it's doing all this garbage. How long can this possibly last?

Not long. Not long. It's like the fall of Rome. The fall of Rome. Everything became decadent.

Endless sex and orgies. No one had enough faith in the state to join the army anymore. And people talk about barbarians destroying Rome. Rome was destroyed from the inside. That's what happens.

And we're witnessing it in real time. And we have all these problems on Earth, and then they want to spend millions and millions of dollars on an investigation to prove that I'm a human trafficker for TikTok. It's clown world. Nothing even makes sense anymore. This is a video from a recent Pride march in New York, and I'm interested in your view of it for your children.

We're here. We're there.

So I have a few points on this. The first point is that it is an unfortunate reality, and I'm not going to be called a bigot. I'm going to talk about the reality that the homosexual community cannot reproduce in and of themselves. So for them to have a community into the future, they do need your children. That's how they think.

For there to be a homosexual community in 100 years from now, they need straight people's kids, because only straight people have children. So they're telling the truth. That's the first thing. They mean what they say. The second thing is, I think a lot of this is an attention grab by them.

I think they are slightly disappointed in how tolerant many people actually are. I have no problem with gay people. I don't care. I'm gay. Cool.

I want to get married. Fine. I'm going to wave my dick in your kid's face. Wait a second. Yeah.

They push it to a point where we have to react, and then when we react, they say, we're bigoted. Children are innocent, and destruction of innocence is one of the most disgusting things on the face of the planet. It's terrible if a child is killed in a war. It's terrible if a child's mind is warped by any propaganda mechanism. They're innocent.

What I don't understand is why imagine heterosexual men walked around naked saying, we're coming for the children. Well, someone gets shot. Absolutely. So why is it when you're a good reason. Completely.

So as soon as there's this sexual orientation, they're completely protected. And I think that the whole point of having children as a whole, is to instill them with your worldview. I know if I have children, I want them to be like me. We just talked about my last name and how I want them to honor me into my post death. Then I want them to be a representation of me, which means they should believe in my values and my creeds.

Why is a group of people in New York walking around telling me what they're going to teach my kids and what my kids should believe? They're not your kids, they're my kids. Right. And that's what's so scary, because children are impressionable and children are raised by the state and the Internet effectively, which is why they want me off the Internet. But they'll let a lot of people stay on the Internet that say a lot about a lot of things.

I'll argue that if I was transgender, the American Embassy would have told Romania they were bigoted and removed me pretty quickly. I would genuinely argue that point. They would say, no, what you're doing is abusive to the LGBT community. He must be removed from jail, of course. Immediately.

Immediately. But because I'm straight and heterosexual, it doesn't matter. We're the class that suffers the biggest bigotry that possibly exists in the Western world today. I would actually argue that point. But they're saying this to be deliberately provocative.

They're deliberately trying to upset people. They want to upset you so that when you talk against it, they can call you names and call you a bigot. And also they mean what they say, and it's truly scary. I'm obviously a Muslim. I'm Islamic.

What most people don't understand about a lot of the Islamic world is that a lot of these things are outlawed, right? But people say so. Gay people can't go there. If you go to Dubai, you will see gay people. If a guy wants to be gay and do whatever he wants to do with a full grown man in his own house, I don't care.

And you can tell. You might have a waiter who's gay, whatever, et cetera. The only reason it's outlawed is not to stop a man full grown man meeting a full grown man and doing what he decides to do. It's outlawed to prevent it bleeding into society and affecting the culture where the children are affected. That's why it's outlawed.

And I'm not saying it should be outlawed in America. But what I'm saying is, if you're not going to protect the innocence of children from any ideology, and if the ideology is deliberately targeting children because children are more impressionable and more capable of believing in things which simply aren't true, perhaps a man looking like a woman or vice versa, then that is a dangerous ideology that should be very closely examined. Well, if you're not going to protect children or if you're going to encourage women to fight your wars, why have a society in the first place? Well, this is the whole point of society to protect women. You know what's really interesting?

I argued this point once. They were talking about how the west is a patriarchy and it's so terrible to be a woman in the west. And I'm like, well, where's better to be a woman then, if it's not the west, please tell me, pick another country besides America where you'd rather be a woman garbage to begin with. But you're saying, oh, America is a patriarchy and Americans, we're all missiles, and men are so bad, and women have been oppressed since the beginning of time. It's always been a patriarchy.

If that's true, why don't women fight our wars? Think about it. We can get the women of our country and the women of another country and let them go die in a ditch. And us men can just sit around being patriarchs. Why do we have to go die?

Why do we have to go get our legs blown off? No, because we're a patriarchy. Women can go suffer. Or do the women get to stay at home and we go suffer? How is it a patriarchy, right?

So that's garbage to begin with. But I think genuinely, to go back to that point, any ideology which is waking up and saying our worldview is so extreme, the only way we can truly ensure it exists into the future is to find the most susceptible people on the planet to program and attack their minds children. I think that's a destructive ideology and should be very closely looked at. It doesn't matter if it's LGBTQ or anything else. I think if you sit children down and pump propaganda into their brain and that's the only way you can get what you want, then there's probably something wrong with your ideas because you're afraid to challenge them with a grown adult.

You don't want a fair fight, you understand? They don't want a fair fight. They want to sit with a child who has no idea what he's talking about and tell him that men are women and women are men, vice versa, and just completely confused a poor child because they don't want a fair fight against a rational adult, and that's scary. It doesn't seem a huge improvement over, say, ISIS to me. Absolutely.

That's how do you convince somebody to blow themselves up? Well, you find a young man, teenage boy, and you program his mind, and it's exactly the same thing. They don't try and convince an older man to blow himself up because he's going to sit there and go, why don't you blow yourself up? And then there's an argument. You go find a young, susceptible person.

Right. And that's what's so scary about all of it. And it's also kind of funny that this whole LGBTQ thing is also linked to the Patriarchy, also linked to all this other garbage and all these other false narratives and false ideas. And it's these people who are attacking me saying I'm dangerous for women because I'm a misogynist. You're dangerous for women for pretending men are women.

You're more dangerous for women than I am. I'm saying a man's, a man's, a woman's. A woman. You're saying that if I put a wig on, I could go punch women in the face in the boxing ring? Who's dangerous for women?

It's insanity. And again, they have no virtue at all. They just weaponize garbage and attack you with it. But I do think that children have to at least be the bottom line for society. That's the future.

And if you have children at home, you're raising them, and if you struggle to feed them, the government doesn't care. They are yours, and they're your problem and your responsibility. And you deal with all of the stress and all the worry of them being out late at night and all the responsibility of taking care of them, and you went through hell for them to exist. You don't owe their minds to anybody else. You don't owe it.

So there has to be a point where you stand up and say, no, I raised this child. That's my child. It's not yours. Absolutely. What do you make of Julian assange?

I think that it's crazy. It's the number one way to shut up the BBC, that's for sure, to mention him, say, oh, you're a journalist. You care about journalism. Do you care about a fair and independent story? Why is Assange in Belmarsh very interesting?

What do they say? They don't answer. They try and change subject. They always do. I did it.

I stole it from the Azerbaijani president. He started I saw that. Yeah. It's great. You know him?

I don't know him, but I've seen enough of his interviews to like him. Me, too. Yeah, I like him. And this is what I'm saying about the world. There's so many places in the world where they still live very firmly in the real world.

All of this garbage is just the result of the very simple, easy lives that we have inside the movie The Matrix, which I recommend you watch. The agents say, we tried to create a utopia for the human mind, so that your mind is in a utopian state and your body can just be used. But the human mind rejects utopia. We created the world in 1999 at the pinnacle of human civilization, before machines took over, because the human mind needs struggle and it needs problems, otherwise it rejects it. Yes.

And I kind of feel it was a whole bunch of people trying to just find problems and find struggle in their lives because they don't have enough motivation to do something that's genuinely difficult, like help people, but they can't live in this state of complete vegetation. So then they wake up and say, oh, I'm oppressed my pronouns. How much energy must it take to go through life trying to correct every person you interact with, to call you Z? Think of the calories burnt. I can't think of a bigger waste of time.

Think of the calories burnt. Every Starbucks employee is actually z. Correct. You are a moron, and you are just wasting so much energy. You could put that towards something beneficial.

You could volunteer, you could go to the gym. There's so much more you could do with walk instead of walking around and talk about z. You sound like a dumb ass. But they're just finding struggle because they don't have any actual importance struggling in their lives, and that's why it only exists in the decadent west. Do you think the coming famine will change that?

Absolutely. I would argue that when the famine comes, I think all these feminists will look for a strong man of resource who is stoic, who has a good network, who's capable and important and respected. It's amazing how quickly feminism disappears. In fact, there's a podcast I did called Fresh and Fit, and I did this podcast in Miami, and I was arguing about gender roles with seven girls, and during it, they were telling me that they can do anything. A man can do all the usual things, and they don't care.

They don't need a man. All this garbage, and some crazy fan knocked on the door for me, and he had a gun. He knocked on the door. You should have seen the women, how quickly they became feminists. When I had to go to that door, they all completely changed.

Go, go. Oh, the feminism's out the window. There's no feminists on the Titanic. There's no feminisms in a famine. There's no feminists at war, where's the feminists go to war, right?

I remember when Afghanistan, when we did that very well planned, very thorough evacuation of Afghanistan and all the schools that we opened for women got shut down by the Taliban. And I was having this conversation with someone, and I was saying, okay, well, you're an Afghan man, right? You've been hired by the Afghan Defense Force and America's now left, and you have a meager wage. And America's left and the Taliban are coming. And you're standing outside of the school with your AK, and they're coming with whatever they've got.

And you're looking at the school going, do I really want girls to go to school that bad? Not really. Just put it down. You walk off and this girl's like, yeah, but you know, it's really important. And I'm like, yeah, it is very important.

I agree women should have education and write the education. Completely agree. But you're also saying here that men should die for it, which is fine. I'm not saying that shouldn't be the case, but I'm saying that you should give men the respect they deserve for dying for your education. Because it's not the women who are going to defend that female school, it's the men.

So if you're going to shit on men all day long and say, we ain't worth anything until a war comes and then you want us to go die, that's interesting. When the famine comes, the closer reality gets towards baseline survival, the closer we become towards our gender roles, because it's the only way we can be competitive. If you took ten men and ten women and stranded them on a desert island, the men would be men and the women would be women, because if they didn't, they would die. That's the bottom line. And I think that if you look at history since the dawn of time, men were masculine, and also men, by and large, were generally ruling the society, not in an oppressive way, but in a protective way.

And I think that makes the society most competitive. And my argument for that is that if you name any society since the dawn of human time, men were protecting women, providing for women, and basically in charge of the society. And these are societies that never met. There can't be an idea that spread. The Ming dynasty and the Aztecs, they're pretty far away, but that's how society was most effective.

And when feminists argue with me and say, we this society run by women, I said, well, that's never, ever happened. And if it has happened, they got destroyed so quickly, they never had a history. We can't even name one. So it's a brand new idea, which I'm not saying is a bad idea. I'm saying if it's a brand new idea, you can't tell me it's going to be better, because it's never been tried, ever.

So we're going to see. But what happens if it doesn't work with the most powerful nation on earth, right? So we're feminizing men and women have more and more control and more power, which is fantastic. I'm saying this is untested. Who knows where any of this is leading?

And our competitors, America's competitors, are still very firm in their gender roles. So it's certainly an interesting period of history you're about to enter. It's very interesting. What's your view of tobacco? I love tobacco, so my diet is particularly strange.

I've been told I live on caffeine and nicotine so I eat once a day. I eat dinner. Only 80% of my calories come from meat. I have ten cups of coffee a day and three or four large cigars. So I like caffeine and nicotine.

I do too. Yeah. It makes me feel good. Makes me feel like my blood's on fire a little bit. Caffeine and nicotine, I think, are fantastic.

But you're a health guy. Obviously I'm a health guy. But smoking is fantastic for your testosterone level, and I think that's important in a man. I think that's also important in the resistance of slavery. You can feel it?

Oh, 100%. And I'm not saying that smoking is healthy. I'm not saying that because I also train exceptionally hard every single day. And when I was professionally fighting, I didn't smoke. But I think, in general, testosterone level is a fantastic way to measure your overall health as a man.

But nicotine has a positive correlation of testosterone. Absolutely. It's been proven. Yeah, it's been proven repeatedly. So that's why I love nicotine so much.

And then caffeine, I love to have that little bit of not jitter, but I like to feel energetic and I like to be hungry. My optimal state is hungry, but energetic. That's how I get the most done. I don't like eating. If I eat, I feel full, I feel lethargic, I like to totally, yeah, I like to be hungry and 1% irritable from my fifth coffee and a bunch of nicotine inside of me.

That's how I like to perform. So, yeah, I think it's a good thing. And it's interesting how focused the people in charge are on nicotine. Fentanyl becomes really common. 100,000 people die a year from it.

Nobody notices, but they're still trying to shut down not just tobacco, but non tobacco nicotine devices. Yep. Why? That's a really good point. We could argue it's down to testosterone level.

I don't know if you ever saw the study which linked people's testosterone level to their ability and capability to disagree with something. So they did a study which is pretty self explanatory. The higher your testosterone level, the more likely you are to disagree with a point. And the reason for that is because, especially in older times, if you're going to disagree with something, you had to fight over it. Yeah.

If you're going to say no to somebody or some tribe or some person, there's a very, like, there's a high chance that you're going to have to fight that person. You have to defend your idea. If you don't have the propensity or the capability to defend your idea, then why would you go against the ideas of the people who are stronger than you? So reducing testosterone levels make men more compliant and more complacent, because we're less likely to say no, because we can't defend what we think. Why would we say, you're wrong, but we can't do anything about it.

We might as well just say, well, then you're right. Mike makes right. So reducing testosterone levels in men is something which I believe they're trying very hard to do. And if you read the studies, they're succeeding. Testosterone levels have gone off the off the edge, off the cliff.

And perhaps that's why they attack smoking so heavily. I understand that smoking a lot of cigarettes can be very bad for you, but I think everything in moderation and I think that overall I would rather smoke a few cigars today and maintain my testosterone level, which it's good for, than not. I think the benefits outweigh the negatives. Couldn't agree more. And my final question is about digital currency.

Do you think it's inevitable and what would its effects be? CBDCs are inevitable and they're scary, they're super scary because it's the final absolute realm of control. I mean, they're already removing cash from society. I think they say that because they want to be able to trace things easier and that's certainly part of it. But I also have another theory on it.

I think if you have a $50 bill and I give it to the barber for my haircut, and then he goes and buys groceries with it from the grocer, and the grocer goes and gets his car washed. A $50 goes from place to place. And after 20 or 30 transactions, the $50 bill belongs to somebody and it's worth $50. Whereas if I pay by card, 1.5% goes to the bank. And then if he takes the money I've given him and pays for the groceries, 1.5% goes to the bank.

And after the groceries have been paid for, when he goes to get his car washed, 1.5% goes to the bank. So after 20 or 30 transactions the $50 is gone. The bank has it all. I think that's why they're so desperate to rid of cash. Interesting, CBDCs are the next level because once the money is completely digital, then they control everything you do with it.

They control where it goes, but they can also control how and when it can be spent. Imagine some terrible future dystopian society where your money arrives and they say it can only be spent on food or it can only be spent on vegetables because you've had too much meat this week. Or you can't buy transport to a particular area because there's resistance of government oppression in that area. So your money won't work for trains right now because nobody can go down there because we don't want everyone in a large group. We want everyone at home in their pods and they can track everywhere it goes and they can also track how it's spent and they can control how it's spent, they can put time limit on it.

You have an hour to spend this money. Scary. Like, think of all the ways they can inflict control over it. And I think this is actually one of the reasons why also I'm disliked the BBC said. This to me when they interviewed me.

They said, lucy, the very intelligent BBC reporter, said word for word, you have a Bugatti and a cigar. And that means it comes with a side order of misogyny. I said, how does having a Bugatti and a cigar come with a side order of misogyny? And you can order misogyny on the side. Looks like it looks like a sauce.

And she repeated it because she couldn't. Yeah, you have a Bugatti and a cigar, and it comes with a side order misogyny. So I was like, but they're not sending their best. Yeah, I don't think they have any best, to be honest. But the point they're making, what she doesn't realize she's making because she's not smart enough.

But what she wanted to say, but she couldn't say in a way which sounded negative, is financial freedom is required to a degree to resist. The reason I'm also disliked is because I'm financially successful. If I was broke, they wouldn't care why I say what I say. But I inspire young men, all of my fans, to become wealthy. And you'd think, that'd be fantastic for the society, right?

He has millions of young men. He's teaching them to work hard. He's teaching them different ways money can be made. He's teaching them to be fantastic salesmen. He's helping the society.

No, because if you have a whole bunch of money, then you can sit and say, no, I don't need your wage. That's bullshit. There was a video very recently of a guy in England taking down all the English flags and putting up pride flags, and a guy screams to him and goes, bro, you're taking down the wrong flag. And he replied, I know, mate. And the point is, what can I do?

I'm a flag, flag guy. If I say no, someone else will do it. Kids got to eat. So by keeping your money enslaved, they can keep you enslaved. You got to eat.

They don't want men to be financially free. If you're financially free, if you have enough money in the bank, you can one day go, you know what? I don't want your money. Even me, now, to this day, I've done enough and I'm successful enough that it's very hard for them to buy me. They come along, Well, I would never sell my soul anyway, because it's not who I am as a person.

But if I was destitute, they could come along and say, andrew, you have all this influence. We're going to change your message. You're going to you this. We're going to give you 10 million, okay? You can't buy me.

Can't buy Trump. He's rich already. He's rich and he's 80, 70 something. You think he needs more money? Doesn't care about money.

They don't like that. So being financially free in and of itself is now an act against the government. Because this whole idea that they want everyone to be rich and it's fantastic for the society. I'd actually argue against that. They don't want that.

They want everyone destitute, because when you're destitute, you need the government to feed you. And it's very hard to fight against the government who's feeding you. It's very hard to resist the people who give out the bread. Yeah, I think that's called something. It begins with C.

What's it called? Interesting. I also heard another interesting theory from a very intelligent person one day. And it was that every government on Earth, all of them and all of their different forms china, which says it's Communist and is capitalist and all the different in betweens to the capitalist west. Every government on earth is slowly encroaching on trying to become as controlling, as powerful as possible.

They all want to be as controlling as possible over their citizens. Communism is the end result of the most control a government can have, effectively, or some version of communism, but every single government on Earth is slowly trying to get there bit by bit. And the only thing that resists them getting there is the populace. And how much the populace will accept. And depending on how malleable the populace is depends on how quickly they get there.

But every government wakes up, it's kind of like AI you've ever heard, the robot is going to destroy us all. Because they wake up and go, we don't need the humans anymore. Their end goal is just survival. If a government is the same as an entity, its end goal is more and more control. And that's all they're trying to do every single day, with every law they pass, with the climate change law.

They don't care about the environment. They want more control, of course. And the more and more control they get, the final end result, if you give them what they want, is absolute slavery for everybody. So you have to be very careful, because that is their ideal government. The ideal government is where everyone complies, everyone obeys, everyone's controlled.

We know everything about everybody, and it's slavery. That's the only way to get that state. So even making money, making enough money to have an opinion, is an act of rebellion. It's crazy. Thank you very much, my friend.

Amazing. Thank you. Thank you. Young pair of people say the news is full of lies on Kennedy's Motorcade 239. Jeffrey Epstein.

It.

Insidious Meme

Tag: Propaganda

The Corbett Report – Your Guide To 5th-Generation Warfare – 09-18-2023

The Corbett Report - Your Guide To 5th-Generation Warfare - 09-18-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

Key Takeaways:

Predictions

Chat with this Episode via ChatGPT

The Corbett Report - Your Guide To 5th-Generation Warfare - 09-18-2023

Kid Wars – 09-07-2023

Kid Wars - 09-07-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

Kid Wars - 09-07-2023

Time Ain’t Nothing – 05-24-2023

Time Ain't Nothing - 05-24-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

Time Ain't Nothing - 05-24-2023

Tucker Carlson HAMMERS Mike Pence. It Was Like Beating a 5-year-old In Ping Pong – 07-16-2023

Tucker Carlson HAMMERS Mike Pence. It Was Like Beating a 5-year-old In Ping Pong - 07-16-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

Tucker Carlson HAMMERS Mike Pence. It Was Like Beating a 5-year-old In Ping Pong - 07-16-2023

RFK Jr. Blows the Lid Off Operation Mockingbird and How the CIA Manipulates American News Media – 07-09-2023

RFK Jr. Blows the Lid Off Operation Mockingbird and How the CIA Manipulates American News Media - 07-09-2023

Open a Cryptocurrency trading account today @ Gemini.com

Episode Summary:

RFK Jr. Blows the Lid Off Operation Mockingbird and How the CIA Manipulates American News Media - 07-09-2023

Insidious Meme

Our UFO Problem - 12-07-2023

Related posts:

The Corbett Report - Your Guide To 5th-Generation Warfare - 09-18-2023

Related posts: