P2 and P3 - 12-14-2022

Hello humans. Hello humans.

December another driving day. Gotta go and get the necessaries anyway. So I'm gonna Ratle on about Protocol Two and Protocol Three of our little examination thing.

When we first set up the group it was decided that we would proceed with a certain rigor, a developed and agreed upon method for doing all of this stuff right, for examining all of this. And so we decided that we would establish a baseline and then work downward, so to speak, or upward, whichever way you want to think about it, in terms of complexity. And so we have Protocol One, Two, Three and Four and they've become increasingly complex as we advance. And so protocol one was the basic things that we could establish with as little speculation as was possible at that time with our knowledge, that took us, like, I don't know, maybe a year or more to work through all of this and sort out throw out stuff that was too much speculation either ourselves or someone else, and on and on. So it was a fairly rigorous method, very much scientific, very much scientific approach to things.

And also had elements of like code reviews where every time we got together we would go through everything and establish, reestablish that baseline, see if anything's changed. So it's, know, reading code at Microsoft or someplace where everybody works on it and then we think it all works and then everybody reads over it just to see if there's anything that anybody else missed. In any event though, so Protocol One is the understanding that we're able to deduce and retroduce from existing circumstances of the now. And this understanding is that at some point in the past, likely beyond 6000 years from our current time, there was an expeditionary force. And it may have been 12,000 years ago, we just don't know, but it was sometime further back than 6000 years.

But there was an expeditionary force that may have totaled as much as a quarter of a million individuals that landed on Earth. And basically they set about taking over these space aliens.

They were called various things in various places. They were here for many thousands of years and then they took off. The expeditionary force itself, which it's true, we're characterizing that as an expeditionary force. It could also equally be characterized as perhaps a remnant of a civilization from somewhere else or a migrant civilization that had no firm base for whatever reason, right? And so these are beyond protocol.

Four. Those are other aspects. Those are side little speculations that we have to get into. In any event though, so the expeditionary force takes off. At that time a small subset of that force, numbering less than 1000 individuals set up shop in three places or didn't set up shop.

They relocated to three different places on Earth. And this was the far edge, the heel, so to speak, of the Saudi Arabian Peninsula that we now call yemen. And this was also the Meso American area down into Guatemala, but up into the southwest Arizona and that kind of thing, right? So that block of Mesoamerica, the northern Mexico, southern United States, southwest United States, that sort of thing, right. Fairly large area there and then Antarctica.

And so at that time, some number of thousands of years ago, which according to our literature in the form of scriptures, et cetera, et cetera, seems to suggest that it was about 2000 years ago, right? More or less. Right. Anyway, no, it was actually okay, so we have to figure in the GAM. So that was when they left.

Okay. That was when the Remnant, the Garrison, that's what we call it, is the garrison. And so if you're a hostile invading force, when you leave, you have a group that is dedicated to protecting the leaving, so to speak, right. The garrison that keeps the hostile natives back and so on until all of your ships are loaded and everybody. And so you collapse your balloon from the inside out, is the way you think of it.

Anyway. So about 2000 years ago, these remnants left, all right? We call the Remnant the L or the Anunnaki here in North America and relates to the Middle East area and how they name the aliens. Well, so the Supposition is, or our Protocol One continues and it says that these people left, as I say, approximately 2000 years ago, they relocated. So they were there maybe about 1800 years, perhaps something in that range.

The group was in Mesoamerica and the other group was in Antarctica and the third group was in the Middle East. And they hung around for, as we say here, for maybe as much as 1800. The consensus is that it's probably much closer to 1000 years, though, and that they were there for 1000 years and they scooted off. Okay? So that's basically protocol one.

Now, protocol one has a stipulation to it. And that stipulation is that it is presumed that everything that resulted or everything that was a result of these space aliens that we now see in our humanity is essentially natural or as we might characterize it, an accident of nature. So that is to say, it was not. That's protocol one. And so because there's no complexity involved in that, it doesn't increase the complexity of the situation to presume that it was simply organic and natural and occurred as a result of these sets of circumstances.

All right? So protocol two deviates from that in that it has this extra layer of complexity. And the extra layer of complexity is that the elements that we find in our humanity now that go to religions. That where those religions were connected to these space aliens. Both the original expeditionary force and this smaller force that was left later or may have come on its own.

See, there's all different kinds of complexities there as well. They may have been part of an opposition. We just don't know. But in any event, so there was the group of the L, the Anunnaki, and the things that they did in Protocol Two were not an accident, okay? So there was an element of a design in all of the interaction of the space aliens with humans such that part of the strategy of all of this was when they left Earth to leave behind the religions.

Okay? So the idea is, all right, so we see in humanity that there is a naturally arising set of circumstances that produces religions or what we characterize behavior that we characterize as religion. We see this in World War II, and there were these cargo planes, right? These little tiny cargo planes that took material, war material, to far distant troops and outposts and so on in the South Pacific. These cargo planes had to fly long distances.

They needed to do what was known as island hopping. And so a number of military bases, basically just crude airfields, were scraped out on top of hills all over these islands throughout the South Pacific, new guinea, et cetera, et cetera, right? And on those islands, we find a curious effect that we now call the cargo cult. But it's truly a religion. The airplanes would land.

They didn't want any trouble with the natives, so they would give the natives stuff. The natives had never seen this kind of stuff. They were quite thrilled. They were just gaga over it. And they loved these mystical, magical beings that would descend from the sky and give them all this bright and shiny stuff.

And then one day, the beings didn't come anymore, and so the humans didn't know what to do, but there was no more shiny stuff. And so they set about doing things, like on more than one island, they decided that the way to do it, to call back these mysterious beings from the sky, was to build replicas of the vehicles that they used. Of the vessels that they used. And so these natives built surprisingly detailed and accurate replicas of small cargo planes out of native materials. And these are like icons.

They're a fetish, in the old sense of the word, a thing, right? And it replicates something else in appearance and feeling, but not in actuality. And so we see that humans naturally do this kind of thing. And so it can't be discounted that this is all, quote, an accident of nature just and it's an accident of human nature in wanting to have the comfort of religion, et cetera, right? And to have shiny stuff.

One way of thinking about it is that indeed, because humans have demonstrated that we do do this kind of crap, this is all organic and natural. Now, another way to think about it is that it's part of a larger strategy that the space aliens either knew that humans did shit this way, or they inculcated that tendency into us in some manner. So it could have been induced or it could be just part of our natural makeup. In either case, it's there and they decided to pursue it, take advantage of it, use it or so on, right? So it was utilized.

So it was a designed in element of their presence here. And so that's fundamentally the departure point for Protocol Two. Okay? So now, obviously, if you think about things as though this was a design in element, then you get back to the idea of why would the space aliens do it? What does it benefit them to have this inculcation of religion, et cetera, et cetera?

And you start coming up with some conclusions like it benefits them if they're coming back, right, because then they could slot right in as take over, not have to worry about whatever kind of mess they're coming back to because they would have preconditioned the natives to accept their presence as the boss.

There is lots of evidence to support Protocol Two. There's also tons and tons and tons of not or very close speculation, very close to the facts speculation about Protocol Two. And so we there's. So, all right, so at this point, Protocol Two seems to be a very likely descriptor of what happened here on Earth in the ancient past. And it provides us with some understanding of why we are as we are now.

Protocol Three is a more minor variant of that, okay? That it's not part of a strategy, but that it was a tactic that was employed by the L, the Anunnaki, the people that were over here in Know, Judea, that area, right? And so that the El and the Anunnaki decided to use that as a tactic for their own purposes while they were here, not intending necessarily for any follow on advantage should they return. So in Protocol Two, the idea is that the space aliens knew they would be leaving and that this was a designed in part of their process to gain them some advantage for when they come back, should they come back. But it was nonetheless designed in from the top at the get go.

And Protocol Three is that for whatever reason, the Remnant Force and or it could have been a follow on force, it could have been an opposition. So the El and the Anunnaki could have been fighting the people that we call the Theoai and the Devas, who were part of the larger expeditionary force. We just don't know. Right? So it could have been a case that the El and the Anunnaki were a small group of space aliens that were in charge or were tasked with following the large fleet that invaded or sent their expedition to Earth, and that they're just keeping track on these guys for whatever purpose.

So Protocol Three presumes that there's a potential that there were actually two groups or more than one group, because it could have been three or four, we just don't know. But there was more than one group of space aliens, and they had their own relationships with each other independent of whatever was going on down here on Earth, and that those relationships preexisted their arriving on Earth. And that's basically the deviation between protocols one, two, and Three. Now, Protocol Three, even though it does not have the larger the element of strategy and merely is using religion as sort of a happenstance kind of tactic developed by the Remnant Group that was here for whatever purpose. And so even though it doesn't have that strategy, it actually has more complexity because of the potential for serious variation in the circumstances among the space aliens themselves.

And so we get off into some huge complexity of Protocol Three. And it's actually kind of a drag when we actually get into it, just because it's so tedious and there's so many splinterings, right? So many points where it splinters into three or four or five or six reasonably minor speculative points in terms of they seem to be reasonably sound, less speculation, but nonetheless a splintering in the sense of, okay, so are the L, the Anunnaki, are they both the same beings, different descriptions, different languages? Are they two different groups? Are these groups either as two or as one, different from the larger expeditionary force?

And it just goes on and on and on with all of these questions that we really don't have any answers to. There are some things that we're hunting for that may give us a sense so that we could speculate a little bit more accurately about some of this. But nonetheless, there's just a lot of complexity in Protocol Three that really doesn't exist in Protocol Two. It's really straightforward. Yes, there's all the minor elements of speculation in Protocol Two, but the essential point of it is that it is a designed in strategy to leave behind a mental preconditioning in the natives such that should you come back, you have an inbuilt advantage in dealing with those natives.

So it actually makes a lot of sense. Protocol Two is, in my opinion, far more likely than it being organic and, quote, an accident of nature, or rather an accident of our nature. Nonetheless, this is a situation that we have at the moment that we have religion. Almost all the religions can be traced back to some form of characterization of a cargo cult, okay, some form of an interaction with space aliens around which we build an emotional structure and hold it in our mind. And we call this emotional structure the religion.

In any event, though, so Protocol Two with this stuff as a strategy, again, in my opinion, more likely than not, it is more likely than three, and also, in my opinion, is more likely than one. And it's the most interesting in my viewpoint because I think that the WEF, the World Economic Forum, the Kazarian Mafia, I think those guys are adherents to what we would call Protocol Two, okay? Even if they don't know it, even if they don't put it out on the space aliens that they deliberately left the religion. So even if they assume that it's like protocol, even if the Kazarian mafia assumes that it's like Protocol One, and that is to say, an accident of our nature and so on. I'm of the opinion that the Kazarians are the ones that are really whipped up about this second coming, that they have a major premise in their understanding of reality.

And that major premise is not only that the space aliens are coming back, but that they're coming back explicitly to interact with the Khazarian mafia. Again, this is yet another variation on Protocol Two in which the Kazarian mafia has taken it personally, right? And so I'm of the opinion that the Khazarian mafia and some of their actions can be predicted by the basic assumption that they have around the second coming. Again, whether they perceive it as a deliberate or a leaf behind or an accident doesn't matter. They're sort of hooked on it.

And we can make some predictions about how they will do things relative to this because of the way in which the okay, so because of the way in which the religion that they claim to follow, because of its effects on them.

All right? So, let's see, there were many religions about 2000 years ago during all the Bible times, right? And one of the main religions was this stuff that we now call Farsiism.

It, it relates to the Phoenicians and it relates to the sea peoples. And a lot of the stuff that is within that comes from the sea peoples. This label has been applied to those people that were following the Talmud now at the time of Jesus, Moses and stuff. These people were not Jews, they were Judeans. There's never been a Jew that went to Palestine except in modern times.

That went to Israel, except in modern times. No Jew has an ancestor that lived in the land and with the tribes that included Jesus and Moses and these guys, okay, this is one of our premises. We can establish this.

So the religion that they had at that time was not Judaism, okay? It was not Judaism as we know it. It was related to the religion that the Phoenicians practiced. And the Old Testament is just a tale of what these people went through dealing with the space aliens. It's not really a religious text in that sense.

It has been made so because of the deliberate mistranslation and editorializing of that in order to create a religion such that monarchies and stuff could take advantage of it. And this is actually one of the reasons that we get the idea that this was a leave behind by the space aliens, simply because we do have this organizational structure that seems to replicate to a great degree that form that the space aliens used, all right? So now the religion at the time, okay, so the Talmud was codified, claimed to have been codified in like 500 Ad. Something like that, right? The fact of the matter is the Talmud did not exist during the time of Jesus and all of the Bible stuff, all right?

The Talmud references the Old Testament. It references books that were created at the time and events that were created or happened at the time of biblical events. So it's referencing those. So it was written after. We also know that many of the books in the Talmud were essentially formulated, perfected, if you will, in what we think of as the Middle Ages, so thousand years after Christ, that sort of thing, right?

So none of these practices that these people have were in effect within the tribes that they have labeled as the Jews. So there were twelve tribes of Yumenes that were conquered by the L, the space aliens, and they were forced to have a long march. This was their exodus. And they had to march the whole length of the coastline all along the Red Sea, what we call the Red Sea now, and they arrived in Judea. That was the exodus.

They never left Egypt at all. They were never in Egypt. Okay, so it was rewritten and it's all fake news as a result of the translation by these 70 scribes that were commissioned by some Greeks to do this. The Greeks that were doing the commissioning were the elites, right? And so they had a particular editorial bent that they wanted put in there, and they put it in there and they altered all this stuff.

And then we have translation upon translation upon translation and deviation and so on. Some Bibles differ some Old Testaments within the Bibles differ from each other by 60% of the word mass. So it gets into some serious deviations there. In any event, though. So talmudism judaism was not practiced in biblical days.

Moses was not a Jew. He didn't relate to anything that was in the Talmud. He didn't practice the rituals that they've got there, any of this sort of thing, no matter what the claims are. And this is part of the stew we're in now. And all the crap we've got to deal with is all of the Khazarian mafia hijacking the Bible for their own purposes, creating anti Semitism.

They're not semites. They're not Semitic people. Anti Semitism means that you're going to be prejudiced against Palestinians or Yemenis, not Jews. They're not Semitic anyway, though. So we get to this point where we're in the global war, and all of this stuff is going to be coming out as we get deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper into it all.

I suspect it might be 20 years before we get into a real examination of these space aliens and stuff relative to our ancient texts, absent some major events happening. Either the space aliens themselves come back or we get a situation where we get a bunch of information coming out of Antarctica, stuff that's like Irrefutable can't be denied kind of stuff. And then we go from there and we are forced to have this discussion. I think this discussion will come up anyway as a result of the Kazarian mafia being eliminated and all the documentation that they've squirreled away and hidden. So they're really weird because say there was a book out there that said bad things about the Kazarians and they paid all of the secondhand booksellers to keep an eye on it.

And when it came in to be sold, they picked it all up and they took them all away and they got all the copies. These guys would destroy all but a few copies. They keep part of the information that they destroy a copy of it for their own purposes. And so I think that a lot of this shit's going to be coming out as the Kazarian mafia is degraded and eliminated and whittled away and we'll see this happening. I think we'll see some aspects of that happening in relatively short order.

I mean, less than a couple of years probably, because we're going to go through some major events relatively quickly. The major events will create situations of chaos. The chaos will allow the information to come out and to spread rapidly because there won't be gatekeepers, there won't be people around to say it's bogus and there won't be mainstream media to pile on it and try and debunk it or layer it over with yet more crap. And we've got people that are getting really good at doing research and investigation on this ship and as they do more and are more successful, they get better and so on. And that's where we're at at the moment.

So I actually suspect that we'll see something that we can some elements of evidence that protocol two is the most likely relative to the three. It's difficult to see a lot of this stuff as an accident of nature anyway, though, getting in here to where I've got to pay attention to driving and get ready to do some stuff. So that's really the difference between the protocols. We've got protocol four identified and it gets off into some other weird shit and then we're going to stop at ten. If we ever develop a full ten, I think we can codify it down to protocol four and then just have deltas deviations off of each of the protocols that inform us of instead of a major protocol change.

It simply is a minor variation. And we'll see going forward here just how accurate we are on some of this. Again, I suspect that we could, if the bastards would let us get at it, that we could confirm or falsify some of these protocols relatively easily with stuff that is just sitting around in Antarctica so, anyway, these bastards are keeping shit from us, and that really annoys me. Okay? Anyway, guys, got to run.

Got to do stuff here, so just to let you know, because I'd had some questions about okay, so what's protocol two? What's protocol call three and so on. I'll talk about protocol four when we've got it a little bit more fleshed out. There's a lot that we're still thrashing out ourselves. All right?

Got to go. Okay, take care.