Parallelsprache - 04-25-2023
Episode Summary:
The speaker begins by discussing recent changes in media, specifically referencing the departure of Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson from Fox News. They draw parallels between these events and historical shifts in media and language in the 1920s and 1930s, particularly in Germany. The speaker suggests that these changes reflect broader societal and political shifts, similar to those in pre-World War II Germany.
The speaker then delves into a detailed historical analysis of the German media landscape in the 1920s and 1930s. They describe the chaotic state of Germany post-World War I, focusing on the role of newspapers and their influence on public opinion and language. The speaker notes the division of newspapers into Jewish and non-Jewish publications, with specific attention to the Berliner Zeitung and its role in the media landscape, comparable to Fox News today.
The discussion shifts to the influence of the Khazarian mafia on language and media, suggesting they used propaganda to manipulate public opinion. The speaker contends that the Khazarians, a group described as being heavily involved in media and propaganda, orchestrated a shift in language to serve their purposes, drawing a parallel to current events.
The speaker then explores the backgrounds of various newspapers and their owners, focusing on Jewish newspapers and their influence. They mention specific figures like Walter Benjamin, a writer who contributed to these newspapers and had significant insights into language and power. The narrative weaves through the complex relationships and ownerships of various newspapers, highlighting the interconnectedness of media, politics, and ethnicity.
The speaker also touches on the rise of the Nazi Party and how the media landscape and language use contributed to this. They discuss how Jewish newspapers were eventually shut down by the Nazis and draw connections between these historical events and current shifts in media and language.
The narrative further explores the backgrounds of various individuals involved in the media, including Julius Streicher, the founder of Der Stürmer, a Nazi newspaper. The speaker suggests that Streicher's anti-Jewish views were influenced by personal experiences and that his newspaper was ironically funded by Jewish families.
The speaker then discusses the role of Jewish bankers in the media, focusing on the Moss and Ulstein families, and their influence on newspapers like the Berliner Tagesblatt and Berliner Zeitung. They suggest that these families had complex relationships with each other and with the Nazi Party, financing newspapers with opposing viewpoints.
The speaker concludes by drawing parallels between the historical shifts in language and media in Germany and current events, suggesting that similar changes are occurring now. They express concern about the potential implications of these changes, particularly for the Jewish community, and urge caution and awareness of the language used in media.
Overall, the text presents a complex and detailed analysis of the historical and current media landscapes, focusing on the role of language, ethnicity, and politics in shaping public opinion and societal trends. The speaker's perspective suggests a deep concern about the repetition of history and the potential consequences of these shifts in language and media.
Key Takeaways:
- The discussion centers on the changes in media and language, drawing parallels between current events and historical occurrences in the 1920s and 1930s, particularly in Germany.
- There is a focus on the role of the media, with specific references to Fox News, and the departure of figures like Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson.
- The text highlights the influence of the Khazarian Mafia in media and propaganda, suggesting a significant impact on public opinion and societal dynamics.
- The role of Jewish newspapers and their influence during the 1920s and 1930s in Germany is discussed, with a distinction made between different Jewish communities and their media representation.
- The narrative suggests a shift in language and media representation, indicating a broader societal and political change.
- Historical figures such as Walter Benjamin and Julius Streicher are mentioned, emphasizing their roles in media and politics.
- The discussion includes references to various newspapers like Berliner Zeitung and their ownership, drawing parallels with modern media outlets.
- There is an underlying theme of ethnic tensions and their representation in media, along with the manipulation of public opinion through media narratives.
Predictions:
- The text suggests a potential repetition of historical patterns in media and societal changes, drawing parallels with events from the 1920s and 1930s.
- It predicts a shift in language and media representation that could have significant societal and political implications.
- The narrative implies possible future challenges for the Jewish community based on historical events and current media trends.
- There is an anticipation of further changes in media landscapes and public opinion, influenced by historical and current events.
Parallelsprache - 04-25-2023
Hello, humans. Hello, humans.April 25. It's around 09:15 a.m. Or something.
Wanted to talk language for a few minutes.Taking a coffee break out here in the brush cutting.
So yesterday we had Don Limoneand Tucker Carlson let goalong witha few other people at the Fox News in the last few days, and it's just struck me as being having historical analogs that are worth talking about here, right?And so we haveif we thought of the Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson as being the face of particular kinds of language at the moment, then we have analogues to this that occurred back in the 1930s. In the 1920s and 30s, we didn't have electronic media to the extent we have today. We had telegraph, et cetera, but they were inventing television and so on, but we had radio, but we didn't have the level of instantaneous communication we have now. So things will progress faster now than they did in the 30s.
Nonetheless, though,it's really interesting as to howwe aresort of echoing what's going on thenin the 30s in the actual language itself. So of interest to me is the changesin the language that arecoming out at the moment.And we havethe potential that we're going to get in that this is an echo of what occurred in 19I want to say 28. Okay? So it's my contention,my premise here, that the language is reflecting a change in the activity of the Khazarean mafia at this point relative to language.
And so the Kazarean mafia is hugely into language. They're into propaganda, all of this kind of stuff. The Tavistock Institute studies,marketing and all that sort of thing, right? They know this down in psychological operations. They know this down to the nats assanyway.
Sowhenever you see things happening within the media, it's not by accident. When a lot of big things happen all at once, you've got another 1928 kind of moment going on.In 1928, we had some major changesin the German media structurethat reflected what would be occurring or thatpresaged what would occur between 1928 and 1933.
All right, so let's see.Let's have a little descriptionof our terrain in the 1920s and 30s.Germany was in chaos.They had gone through the Weimarhyperinflation in 1923, and the government collapsed.The social order collapsed as well in the sense of structure, order, regularityjustice, economy, banking, all of that.
But people still had to do things. They still did things, and the German society kept going along. Everybody didn't kill themselves when the money went bad, right?But it took them forever to work their way out of it in the process of doing so. If we look at thenewspapers and just taking newspapers, most of the radio broadcasts at that time were reflective of what was going on within thedaily and weekly newspapers.
There were more weeklies than there were dailies because of the cost.And it'ssort of the analog to today's majornews media, right? So we could say thatFox News is the equivalent of likeBerliner Zaitung, which was the mainnewspaper, right? It'sthe Berliner newspaper basically is the name. And it had been started in 1877 and was cooking right along and in the 1920s it occupied a rolesort of similar to what Fox News does.
Fox News is still progressive, right? Fox is still a progressive statestation, progressive network and Berliner Zeitung to a certain extent was progressive. But anyway, so here's the situation. There were a number of major newspapers in Germany.A lot of them came out of southern Germanyand Berlin.
The newspapers could broadly be broken up into Jewish newspapers and nominally non Jewish newspapers. Okay? So there were Jewish newspapers that werecreated for writing, was forthe Jewish community. It was circulated in the Jewish community and not very widelybeyond that.Like there was dermorgan.
Now, Dermorgan was a little bit of an interesting Jewish newspaper because it had a wide circulation up until it closed rightoutside of the Jewish community because it handled politics very well. There were some very influential thinkers, a lot of good writers for itand it hadsome serious prestige that it had garnered by the nature of the people that wrote for it.So I became aware of it because of a guy by the name of Walter Benjamin who was a writer in language and who had somelanguage and politics and literary stuff and all this kind of thing,but who had some really key insights in language and power. And some of his work was later ontaken in and inculcated into propagandaand how that all works.I became aware of him because of his impact on the discussions around language.
And he was a writer for Dermorgan. He wrote for other newspapers as well, including the Berliner Zaitung. Okay, so he was writing for now, the Berliner Zaitung was a general circulationdaily publication,not for the general Jewish community, but like almost all the other newspapers, it was owned by a Jewish family.They were the Mossesfirst thought as Moses and then later on it was changed to Mo S-S-E.This familycomes from hang on a second.
That was the Berliner Talkblot,the Berliner daily that was owned by the Moss family. It was the Ulstein family that created the Berliner Zaitung. Okay? And so they were Jewish, the Ulstein family, and they kept owning it all the way through the war. They were actually Khazarian.
Okay? So here's where it gets into the tricky stuff. My contention is that the Khazarians have decided to change the language andare in another one of theirlet's freak out and maybe sacrifice Jews kind of a thing, right?Because in 1928 we had a significant shift in the language and all these newspapersstarted attackingthe Jewish community linguisticallyin ways that led up to theassumption of power of the Nazi Party in 1933. And then the shutting down of all of these Jewish newspapers, okay, they became illegal at that stage and were all banned and shut down.
Now, they were trying to counter the Ghazarian language. But here's the thing, okay? So the language of the regular newspapers circulating in Germany, the nominally non Jewish newspapers were still owned by the Jewish community. They were just owned by Khazarians. Now, the Khazarians also ownedsome of the otherJewish newspapers, but not all of them.
So Der Morgan wasthe Morningwas out of business in 1933, and it was owned by non Khazarian Jews, right? These people were Jewish, but they're not in the club of the Khazarians. And they were hunted down and kicked out of Germany and all of that.Dermorgan is interesting because it had four really influential writers, all of whom are Jewish and all of whom had the same fate in the sense that they all wrote for this newspaper. They all wrote for other newspapers, including the Berliner Zaitung and all these other literary gazettes and that kind of thing.
But these four writerswalter Benjamin, the language guy, kurtCholowski, I think his name was, he wrote about mainly he did like plays and that sort of thing. But he was very much anti Nazi,anti authoritarian, anti Khazarian mafia. Then there was Ernest Taller and Joseph Roth. Okay. Now, Joseph Roth came from a Khazarian family, and he kept, in 1928 through 33 in the rise of Nazism.
He kept pointing out all of the Khazarian connections tothe Nazi Party.And here's the thing.He was talking about people he knew. So there's a famous newspaper called Der Stermer the Stormer, okay? It became thequasi officialnewspaper for the Nazi Party.
It was started in the1923, I think,almost at the height of the hyperinflation. This newspaper starts up it starts up by this guy,JuliusStreet.Street. S-T-R-E-I-C-H-I think Anyway, he's an interesting character because he comes out of nowhere, but he comes out of a very particular nowhere, which is a place calledFlynnFleinhousen, okay? And that's in Bavaria.
It's a littlevillage in Bavaria. Very nice. They've got some good cafes there. When I was there, they had excellent coffee.
Butflying housing means flax house, okay? And the whole village existed used to exist because of its nearness to a tributary to this particular river. And they would process the flax and turn out fiber. And so you find that flinghausen in that particular part of Bavaria is the center of all kinds of money. That was Kazarean money that took from theflax and cereal growing.
That was they got their money from the flax and the cereal grainsgrowing in Eastern Europe and Eastern Germany. And it was concentrated in Bavaria because that's where a lot of the processing of the foods as well as the fibers was done. And then ultimately there's this connection between Fleinhausen and all these newspapers. And you have to understand it was because of the connection to fiber, to the actual plant fiber. That little whizzy noise is a hummingbird that's a little pissed at me.
Anyway,soStrecher came out of a flying house and he was just this little Bavarian kid that had extremelyanti Jewish views. And this was because of what happened to him when he was a kid, okay? So he was basically assaulted and beat up bya Jewish gang that heintruded on them in an illegal actin the hills of Bavaria. And they beat the crap out of him to the point that as a kid, maybe he was eleven or twelve years old, he ends upcrippled for lifewith a couple of injuries to his legs that really did impact the rest of his life. Now he ended up being executed in 1946in the denoxification programs that were run by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin.
Okay. Except for Churchill, all Jews. Stalin was a Jew. Roosevelt was a Jew. Right.
Anyway, so it's just also really weird.But again, my contention is that the Ghazarians have shifted the language and this may be a prelude to them once again trying to sacrifice the Jews in order to aid their own escape of the consequences of their acts for these last hundred plus years. Right. Or thousands of years,depending on how far back we want to go. Okay.
So streeter starts der sturmer. Streeter comes from Fleinhausen in Bavariaon the road to Switzerland, basically from southern Germany.He starts their sturmer in Frankfurt. Frankfurt was the center of publishing. One of the centers of publishing along with Berlin.
He starts it with money from a buddy of histhat he gotthe money in Bavaria. This guy was streetcher was not from a wealthy family. He didn't have a lot of dollars at all. And he's plumped in 1923, unexpectedly gifted with all this money, and he moves from Bavaria down into southern Germany, into the flatlands and starts this newspaper that was very much anti Jewish. And the peoplethat gave him the money, the people out of Bavaria, so he thoughtwere prompting him to continue that anti Jewish tirade within his newspaper, which he did from 1923 on.
It was 1923 he started and he gets into the Nazi party and yada, yada yada, off we go with that. But what's really interesting is that ultimately if you trace it, you find out that his money came from the Moss family. Right? Mo S-S-Ewhich was Rudolph Moss, was the, was theowner and the creator of the Berliner Talkblot.That was a very progressive Jewishdaily newspaper out of Berlin.
It was basically their version of The New York Times. Whereasthe Berliner Zytog might be thought of as a more conservative paper. Right. It was not as progressive as thetotblot which daily speak. Right,the day speak.
The daily, okay. But Rudolph Moss was an extremely progressiveJewish guy that ends up,I don't know what his family was. Okay, so he converts to Christianity in order tofit in with things later on, he'sno, that was sorry, I'm getting him confused with the Zeitong. Okay, soit was Leopold Ulstein that was thestarter ofthe Berliner Zeitung, the Berliner newspaper. This guy gave money to his supposed rival, Rudolph Moss.
Now it was actuallythe Ulistine family. It wasn't actually Leopold. He started it in 1877 and hischildren were running it at the time that we get into the 1920s.And it was a pretty good empire. It was a very big publishing empire.
So it had analogues to Fox News. Now these are all analogues. They don't swap over. But basically what happens is that Leopold's family, the Oldsteins Jewish guys,convert over toor give money over to rudolph Moss, who had his family also Jewish, had started a newspaper. So two Jewish families starting newspapers.
Rudolph Moss is very progressive with his newspaper and he ultimately converts to Christianity. Now,later on, the Nazisaccused him of converting to Christianity in order to save his money. And they took his money and took his empire and all of that stuff anyway. So it didn't do him any good. But he was the conduit for money from Ulstein over to Stryker.
Ulsteinhad his hands in his own opposition.There's a lot of talk that Olstein family also financed part of the Moss family's expansion to create the Talkblot, the progressiveversion of the daily newspaper in Berlin,where we find that there was continuing work byprogressive Jewish writers that would be the equivalent of, like, Don Lemon. All right, in terms of actually much more no, they're not the equivalent. He's just a news reader. These guys actually wrote and could think and shit.
Right?He can read that's about it anyway, though. But we do find analogues in the language itself. Okay, so let's not get really confused here. Berliner Zeintung owned by the Ulstein family,which they kept their newspaper.
They didn't get denotsified, they kept up into the 50s. Theystill had their empire. They were Jewish. They had some small issues with the Nazis, but mainly not from the Ulstein family. We have connections to thoseJews that worked for the Nazis, such as Soros and Klaus Schwab's father.
So Klaus Schwab's father is related to the Ulstein familyfrom Berliner Zeitung. Okay? So he's deep into the propaganda all the way back before World War II.The family is okay. Now inthe Todblat started by Rudolph Moss was bought out in the 1920s by Jewish bankers and they held it until 1929when they sold it to Olstein.
He actually at that point was Olstein had enough moneythat he was a major banking guy as well as running all these newspapers. Now, the Olstein familycame out of Bavaria, they came out of the Fleinhausen, the same Bavarian village that Julius Streeter came out of, and they end up financing him through their acquisition ofMoss's newspaper. Okay? Soit's just really curious. I don't know why street would take money from Jews.
And he must have known. He was it was in fact reported by other Jews in Dermorgan.BothErnest Taller and Kurt Chalowski commented on it or wrote opinion pieces about it.So it must have been known at that time.Nonetheless, you didn't have the conspiracyunderstanding then that we do now.
Chloe no.
So anyway, it's just my point here that we're going to get athat we've had a language shift that yesterday mark with the firing of Lemon and Tucker Carlson leaving, and he can go off and create his own billion dollar empire really damn quickstart rivaling Elon Musk kind of thing. But this is all reminiscent of a lot of the shit that went down in the consolidation and changes of the language in the 1930s, and it was actually begun in 1928. And if you go back and start reading articles translated from the German from these newspapers, and you contrast the stuff that's being reported in Dermorgan and some of these other Jewish newspapers, and there were like four or five of them out of Berlin that were just really on the mark as to what was going on. And they reported on,I guess, the other aspect of the Jewish community. Sothe Jewish community at that time had progressive newspapers, but they did not have a great deal of conservative newspapers.
The conservative newspaper or conservative thought in the Jewish community at that time was somewhat restricted to individual writers. There were noplatforms for it, if you will. Right. It wasan aspect of their individual work that brings certain writers out, because they were commenting on what was going on in the Jewish community that they did not like, some of which seemed to point to them, to this weirdness ofEastern European Jews from Ukraine, aka Khazaria,involving themselves with the Nazis and getting this whole thing going.Obviously, the Jewish community at the time didn't like Dere stermer and so to have it reported that it was being financed by and a lot of the writing was being donebyUkrainian Jews didn't go over well.
So here's the thing about this, right?
As I say, there were these four writers, ernest Taller, Joseph Roth, Walter Benjamin, who was just this great language guy and reallydid some key work inwhat is language, how it works with humans, et cetera, and then also Kurt Chalowski.All these people came to a bad end. They survived the war. They were kicked out of Germanyfor being Jewish writers. They were forced to emigrate.
One of them, I don't know which one, I can't remember, maybe it wasTaller, Ernst Taller, or maybe it was Kurt Chalowski. But one of these four guys was put in a concentration camp forthree or four months and then let out and told he had to leave the country, which he did.Maybe that was the one that one of the four writers tried to make it toAmerica and was turned backin New York and ended up having to stay on the steamship and went to Spain where he was incarcerated in a Spanish fascist concentration camp. Now he died there. And again, I'm sorry, I can't remember which one of these four, all four of these guys ended up being suicides.
Okay, that's their official. Except for one of them I don't know if it's official or not, but three of them, it's their official cause of death. If you look into their biographies, they all suicided, supposedly.And they all suicidedwithin a very short period, like within days or weeks of beingof encountering officialdom. The one guy in Spain, another guy in Sweden,he was in exile.
He lived the longest. I think he lived until like 38 or 39.
So there there was one guy okay, maybe it was a guy in Sweden, so maybe that wastaller. One of them in Swedenhad hadhealth issues and so they say that that's why he killed himself, was for his health issues. But it was just curious that he had been visited in his place in Sweden at that time bywhat we can only assume aresome kind of Nazi officialdom, which is to say controlled by the Khazarians. Right? Much of the Nazi Empire was controlled by the Khazarians.
We find Klaus Schwab worked there. We see george Soros worked there.They worked for Hitler.There were a great number of Khazarian Jews working for Hitler that you just don't ever see these guys mentioned. You don't see the discussions about them and it's like ignored anddenied by historians, but nonetheless, it's quite factual.
Anyway. SoI've seen some indications here locallyin the United States,and I'm seeing some just today in some other parts of other countries, and I think that the Khazarians are reallyfreaked out and I think the Khazarian mafia is just likekind of losing it. And in my opinion, the language changes I've seenrecently here over this last couple of weeks and then yesterday, as well as themajor changes in the face of language.Tucker and Lemonare kind of likesigns on the path, right? And I think we're taking a path that the Khazarians are going to want to haveagitation against Jews to kind of sort of give them a way out.
I don't see how it does. I don't see how that's going to work. But the language, as I say, is very reminiscent of what happenedin theshift in language in the Berliner Zeitung that took place from 29 and through 30 as the rise of the Nazi Party even though the newspaper was 100% Jewish owned, et cetera, et cetera, right? They could have at that timejust simply done what the New York Times has done, so to speak, and they could have just not gone along with the Nazis, but they did. So sort of like Fox News maybe has caved to the US government and got rid of Tucker for that particular reason in order to save their hide.
Who knows what's going on there, but it is somewhat reminiscent of what was going on in these newspapers in Berlin during that time.Just curious, guys.I think everybody should be really paranoid,but I think also that if I were Jewish, I would start really looking at thelanguage that's being printed and to see what comes out.Bear in mind the Kazarian mafia, they don't consider themselves Jewish, right? They're all Satanists and they know explicitly that they're hiding in the Jewish population and they explicitly will sacrifice that population to save their own hide.
I just think something like that is sort of shaping up here and it may take a while to develop, but nonetheless, I find linguistic parallelsbetween what was written in these newspapers in the 28 through 33 period of time and what we're seeing now, especially arising in these last few weeks. We've gotten some temporal markers that arespecifically elevatingintensity andshifting over emotions relative todirect and tangential Jewish associated linguistics.Anyway, I got to get moving. It's going to rain on this hair. I still got to get some brush cuts, so just thought to mention that, especially after yesterday.
Take care and keep an eye out. Things are.
View me!