Chaos Kontrol and Harmony - 05-14-2023
Summary:
The text discusses the concepts of harmony, free will, and the philosophical framework of Samkhya. It begins by mentioning dualism and the reduction of everything to binary choices. The author argues that our current understanding of physics is limited and mentions the existence of UFOs as evidence of this limitation. They introduce the concept of retroduction, a form of analysis that works backward from known facts. The text then explores the philosophy of Samkhya, credited to a figure named Kapila during the Vedic period, which predates many religions. Samkhya views consciousness as the Absolute, perceiving the material world as inferior and emphasizes individual human souls as encapsulations of consciousness. The author contrasts Samkhya with what they refer to as "atheistic" or "Jewish physics," claiming that it denies consciousness as the source of everything. They argue that the universe has purpose, unlike the proponents of "grit" or materialistic views, and that consciousness creates novelty and free will. The text also mentions Terence McKenna and his experiences with hyperspace journeys, which reinforce the significance of novelty. Finally, it suggests that free will exists only in conscious beings, while insects, for example, exhibit predetermined patterns.
The text discusses various concepts such as free will, determinism, dualism, religion, collectivism, individuation, and the role of organizations in society. It highlights the belief that religions are degraded forms of a science called Sam kia, which focuses on individuation and liberation. The author argues that religions, although necessary for many people, limit individual free will and hinder the creation of novelty. They express a personal opposition to organizations and collectivism, viewing them as anti-free will and anti-novelty. The text also touches on the Cathari religious group, the influence of the Jewish banking system, and the author's anticipation of a future world characterized by chaos, individual freedom, and the potential for greater harmony and self-understanding. The author emphasizes their preference for the scientific aspect of understanding reality and mentions meditation as a helpful tool for achieving individuation.
Episode
It. Hello, humans. Hello, humans. May 14 out here taking a break. It's like 838, quarter nine, something like that.
A m sun shining. Weather is very nice. It's very warm. We got up to 76 yesterday. Very exceptional out here on the coast.
It and we're contemplating the issue of harmony and free will. So in the okay, so there's everything is dualism in this material, right? No matter which way you want to approach it, you can always reduce everything down in a you can always reduce it. So down to dualism, down to a binary choice. So we live in a binary material.
This is actually a form of thought or analysis, like codified analysis called retroduction. And it's like induction. So it's sort of some of the stuff that Sherlock Holmes kind of using, right? Work your way backwards from a known factual position, and so you deny anything that would you just throw out as being impractical anything that is on its face, a denial of a certainty. So, in other words, any kind of physics that says that UFO behavior is contrary to physics, you would have to put a qualifier there in order for me to accept that and say known physics, because we have UFOs.
They're demonstrable. You can see them. The physics they demonstrate is not what we use in our jets and stuff. And so in that sense, it defies our aerodynamic understanding of what can happen in the atmosphere or even oceans, the hydrodynamic as they go in and out of the oceans, this kind of thing, right? But we know that they exist.
Er go. Our physics is lame and stupid if you're going to be relying on it. And so in a retroductive fashion, you can determine and analyze things by not going down paths that deny an existent reality that you can see. Okay? So if we go all the way back to if we go into retroduction, we can go into the idea of we can say that there's basically two kinds of physics, okay?
The physics we operate under now I term is atheistic. A lot of other people say it's Jewish physics, but I just say it's atheistic because it approaches everything with the idea that consciousness is the end result of gluing bits of grit together, okay? As opposed to consciousness is the beginning and everything and that material and matter. Grit is a creation of consciousness. It's not something that evolves into consciousness.
In other words, without consciousness, the grit does not exist. Right? The grit isn't out here floating in space. Space doesn't exist if there's no consciousness. This goes all the way back to an ancient Hindu exploration of this idea, and we'll use their terms here in a minute.
It was called sam kriya or sam kia. Sam kia. Okay. S-A-M-K-H-Y-A It was a really interesting thing because a guy who gave it to the Hindus did so in the period that was called the Vedic period. No one knows when he lived exactly.
His name is like Kappala. K-A-P-I-L-A.
So Kappala gifted the Hindus this particular idea that is like pre religion. So all religions evolve from his idea. And if you go and look it up, you'll see that that's the case of it. But what he had is neither a philosophy nor a religion. It is truly a science.
Okay? So it's always referred to in the Vedic tradition as the science of Sam Kia. Anyway, so his terms what's really interesting about him, by the way, is that he was a redheaded Aryan, and he came from the north after the period of the Great Flood or some other form of disruption of their society, right? And then he introduces this idea, and it goes on to even inform Buddhism. And it supposedly also informed aspects of the Talmud.
And there are references in the Talmud that you can see that it goes to it, but the Talmud says that everything is not in, it is horseshit, and that it was self referential and self creating. So it took nothing from anything else, which is really bogus. But in any event, though, so here's the idea. The idea is that there is consciousness, and in Sam Kia, the Capilla called it the Absolute, or the Absolute one.
And then there is all the Manifest, everything that manifest, written large with a capital M. So something is manifest. It is material. And anything that's material is inferior to the Absolute, because the Absolute is the consciousness that perceives the matter, and that we are individual encapsulations of this consciousness that is called we're called jiva jiva. And as individual human souls and encapsulated versions of consciousness, as we perceive things, we learn about ourselves.
And so that's sort of the idea, right? Now, Sam Kia recognizes the science, recognizes that there is a purpose to this. The universe is not purposeless, unlike the grit people, right? Einstein and all of those fellows are from a Jewish tradition that denies consciousness. And in fact, when you go into physics now, you're explicitly told anytime you bring up any ontological, any consciousness creating anything, we're going to throw it out.
You can't write papers about it. We won't accept it being submitted. You can't have any aspect of that involved. It has to be from this grit, only kind of an approach. And so they've got a real lock on the education system in the Western world, but that's not true in other parts of the planet, primarily in the Hindu influenced regions, right?
Because they accept a more ontological, that is to say, consciousness created everything, and you are conscious. Ergo, you'd better start thinking about consciousness right off the get go, because if you don't, you're really stupid. And so I find actually that that's a good criticism of the atheistic Jewish physics that we're operating under. Okay?
So the idea is that consciousness needs to discover novelty. That that's the whole point of the material. This idea also comes through in those fierce tourists. They're going to get it. Now.
This idea also comes through in Sam Kia, and they don't phrase it quite that way, nor does it as far as I know. It doesn't get into the idea of harmonizing with this in a deliberate way, however, on a more than individual basis. In any event, though. So the idea is that free will exists, it's certain. And that certainty proves through this chain of logic that free will is a tool of the absolute, the absolute one.
Okay? So in our thinking, free will is a tool of universe. If you're a Qathari, free will is a tool of God if you're a Christian or Muslim, that kind of thing, right? And that the idea is that the free will is there, that there might be novelty that you might choose. So you're given free will that you may choose that you may decide in a way that supposedly the absolute universe, god would not know what that choice is ahead of time, because it's really a bitch if your absolute consciousness, because you know everything that's going to happen, right?
And so novelty is very difficult to create. And we find that in our own materium here, that the materium is extremely deterministic and we have no real randomness that we're able to initiate. And that randomness always comes with constraints.
So even in our programming, we're always constrained by the RND function that goes all the way down to assembly language, which is what all the other languages call when they call for a random number generation. And that random number is within a parameters, constraints that are designed in and you can't exceed these. So it's not really random. We find that this is actually quite true in universe as well. That's why everybody gets all hung up on mathematics, because they find patterns in there that indicate that the very nature of mathematics itself is non random.
And that a difficult concept to get across, but that there are layers and layers and layers of design patterns across all of universe, all of them going to the idea of let's obscure everything we can such that random may arise, such that novelty may arise. And so this is the deep understanding that Terrence McKenna comes back with from all of his hyperspace journeys, as well as a lot of us from our hyperspace journeys, because novelty is the currency in hyperspace. So it's all new ideas. So if you got a new idea, you can trade, all right, if you don't have anything to offer in that, no one will stop and talk to you or want to transact with you. And it's all newness of ideas anyway, though.
So the idea here is that free will is a tool of universe to attempt to provide the idea for randomness and novelty and novelty creation on a vast scale by giving all of us free will.
So really, free will only rises to a level where you have aware consciousness. So an insect has no free will. If it gets blown from one place to another, it will still exhibit those same patterns. It's not going to react to its circumstances. If it's a left leaning insect and always turns left, it'll always continue to turn left, et cetera.
And so that's just the way that universe is set up and that this free will tool is ours for this use. Now, if we step away from that and examine dualism again, we see that dualism. So free will or determinism, free will versus determinism. And we keep seeing binary and duality everywhere. If we step back again and we look, we see that, for instance, religions, right, religions have according to the science of the Samchia, the religions have, okay?
So the point of the science of Sam kia is individuation, such that liberation occurs, all right? So this is how Buddha became informed of it, and he said, don't follow me unless you need religion, right? The religion will not give you liberation. The path I followed will give you liberation. But you may need a religion instead.
So here's that and the vast majority of people are not ready for the science. They need the religion. The religion is the encapsulation of the point of the science and focused at a DEA deity, an outside entity, right? And so all religions are degraded forms of the science of Sam kia in that they are collectivism. So in collectivism is conditioning of your essence, your awareness, perception, where you are at a spiritual level.
All of that is conditioned by being in a religion, by being in the organization. And it is through individuation, beyond the religion individuation and actual experience, a Zen kind of an approach, if you will, that you actually obtain liberation and understanding at a way that is not possible with collectivism. And so it is a point of the science of Sam kia that universe favors individuation as much as it is possible. But not everyone or every being can be individuated because they're not at that point now where their spiritual journey, their soul or whatever would accommodate this. And so no one is basically they're saying, don't give people shit for getting into religion.
They need that. Now, just because you don't doesn't mean you're superior. It just means you're a little bit further along on the path, but that means you're dragging more people behind you. You have a bigger burden, so don't get puffed up about it, right?
Anyway, so the idea of the individuation is to provide you the vehicle in the form of free will that you might use to exercise novelty, because that's ultimately what universe desires, which is the creation of novelty and newness in a way that universe, the absolute God, would not be able to anticipate that novelty arising right? A very difficult task when you think about it. If you really think about this, you got to really work at this shit to create novelty. Anyway, we see with religions like Catholicism, less so with Mohammedism, with Islam, but they're very much collectivized, okay? So in Catholicism, it's all collectivized up to the central point.
But that's because the Kazarean mafia has taken it over since 325 Ad, when Constantine, who was under their influence, set everything up and consolidated the 1200 Christian sects into this one religion under pain of death. Okay? We see that the rabbinical schools of Judaism tightly bind all of Judaism into this interconnected, very much centralized, although there's necessarily no central leader arising at any given point, aka, there's no real Pope at any given point, unless there's a need for a central figure. So it's more of an interconnected, very tightly interconnected networking structure, as opposed to the monolithic pyramidical structure of the Catholic Church, but they're nonetheless still collectivized organizations. We see a similar thing that's more of a blend between the two within the various sects of Islam, right, where some of them are more pyramidal and others are more distributed, but nonetheless, it's still a collectivism.
And that's the nature of our religion. People advance through religion and they step out of it in one or more of their lives and they become individuated. And then they go on to explore this science here of the absolute versus the existential. And so, again, going back to the idea of that dualism there anyway, okay, so in the Cathari understanding of this so catharis are not they used to be when they were very populous throughout France and Spain, Portugal and spreading into northern Italy. That's what really triggered the crusade against them and the elimination of them and the Templars.
With this Cathari crusade in which, over 20 years, hundreds of thousands of people were killed. This is where the famous saying, kill them all, let God sort it out, comes from, because the Pope and the French King were presented with the idea, well, Jeez, these catharis live among all these Catholics in southern France and northern Spain and in Portugal. What are we to do? And that's when the Pope says, Kill them all, let God sort it out. Anyway, so the Cathari are in a static getting into ecstasy.
Not the drug ecstasy, it didn't exist back then, although they did use psychedelic drugs quite deliberately. But they are a decentralized, no, central operating structure of a religion. And it's a personal experience religion, okay? And also they have an origin story that goes back over to northern India in this particular war that forced all these people out and they ended up going all the way over to France, and that's where Catharism had found its home after being driven out of northern India, back in the Vedic or pre Vedic. No, it would have been Vedic period anyway.
So 5000 years ago, right, this would have been the time of the war that moved the L from northern India over to Khazaria, where they set up shop temporarily, we think, for maybe as little as 600 years. And then they were forced down into the boot of the Saudi Arabian Peninsula, which is Yemen, and that's where they conquered the Essenes and moved them up the Red Sea to be to Judea, to become the Judeans that the Khazarians later on took over their origin story to claim that everybody was a Jew anyway, though. So the Cathars have an understanding of the idea of urge and demiurge, but it's an interesting concept here, but it's the absolute and the existential. And so in the Catharian understanding, the absolute, the God approach of it is the good and the manifest is the bad. Right?
But it doesn't mean bad in the sense of you don't want to have anything to do with it, you want to kill yourself and all of that. It just means that, well, I won't go into all of that. But basically, the catharis are a distributed structure, no central authority, no central canons, but a collection of basically techniques for a personal experience, religion. So they were an anathema to all of the organization, to all of the collectivists, because collectivists can't stand individuation. And so the Kathari were destroyed, killed in this crusade.
That aspect of free will was demonstrated with a collective mindset, right? As my people, my lineage is Kathari. I have this deep distrust of organizations because I know that organizations and collectivism always leads to a reduction in free will. And so that that is actually not harmonious in the Kathari sense, with universe, with what universe wants to do. And I'm an aikidoka, and the ultimate thing within Aikido is harmony.
Harmonizing with the attacker, harmonizing with your energy, harmonizing with the energy of the moment, harmonizing with the environment of the moment. Yada, yada, yada. And so it is important for me that we see these things in a realistic way, right? And so the WEF, right, all of their organization, the climate stuff, all of that, the pandemic, their infiltration of all the governments, this sort of thing, are all collectivist moves, and thus they're anti free will, they're anti novelty, because you don't get novelty arising under the influence of these people. All right?
So it's quite true to say that I'm in agreement with a number of the other influencers when I say that the Jewish banking system is anti free will, anti novelty, because we don't get novelty under that system. Mostly. Tesla did all of his work in an environment in which we had sound money, and so there was no banking system involvement in his work. Had he come along 20 years later, we would not have what we have from his genius, because the bankers would have suppressed it, because it's in their interest to suppress it, to keep us all dumb, happy, enslaves okay? So I'm against organizations and structures that way, and I have a purpose in my being against it, right?
This is not like the much maligned white man's purpose, right? I'm simply harmonizing with universe. Universe has a purpose. To say that it doesn't is to be an atheist and a denialist, in my opinion. And basically I'm not going to take your opinion very highly because you're probably one of those people that thinks a man can become a woman if he chops his dick off.
So you're an anti science person at that level. And so in my opinion, when they say scientific consensus, they are talking collectivism, they are talking control, and it all goes back to and these messages are in your face everywhere. Like if you grew up in the 1950s and 60s or sixty s, I think it was, you would have seen a TV show, what was it called? Maxwell Smart. And in there he worked for an organization called Control.
And what they want to do, they wanted to control everything, and they wanted to prevent chaos from arising. And what was his designation? He was 86. And what is 86? It's a popular slang phrase for foods no longer served at restaurants.
It's a code for that. Oh, that's been 86. It's a numerical code for the same thing in the merchant fleet. Oh, that's been 86, meaning we had to jettison it at sea. And so 86 came into the insurance business from the maritime industry, right, because some cargoes would go bad, you'd have to throw them out so that other cargoes could be preserved.
Because as a merchant marine, that was your primary task, was to get as much of the cargo there as safely as possible. And so some stuff may have to be sacrificed. It was 86. And so we see these things all over. So that was the 86 was the code for writing cancel in epsidic, also called Epcodic, the IBM computer language that was pre ASCII it was a computer code that was priasci.
Okay, so Maxwell Smart's girlfriend was, can't think of her name now, but her designation was 99. She was Agent 99. 99 is terminus, 99 is goal. That's the completion, the exit, the exit code in ebkdik programming most frequently in IBM anyway, though. So we see that the free will versus Control things are everywhere all around us, right?
And everywhere in media. You see, even though they may say they're opposition and all this kind of stuff, they're always hyping on going back to Control, which is, in my opinion, an anti free will, an anti novelty and anti harmonious way to do things. I'm of the opinion that we're at the end of that, that moving into the age of Aquarius. We're going to come into a very weird world for everybody who grew up in the ages of Control, because our weird world will have governments fall away, but we'll discover we don't need them, and we'll replace them with other things. But it'll be very chaotic in the sense that there won't be a structure in which you live your life.
You will be free to do what you want and express your free will, and very few people will give you any shit about it until you cause them problems, and then there won't be anybody around to prevent them from stopping that level of causation. And it'll all work out very much like a Wild West kind of a situation. This is heading to us very rapidly. A lot of people that dispute this have only ever lived their lives in the United States. And I've lived all around the planet, and I've seen these countries where that was the operating principle, where there was nominally a government, but it was so powerless that you never took it into account at all for anything.
And you made your arrangements on your own. And that's the world we're coming into. Extremely chaotic, but opportunity and opportunity for harmony with free will, novelty in creating novelty that is going to be unparalleled in our experience and will open us up to an entirely new understanding of ourselves and this reality.
So there's your sermon for today, guys. I'm not into religion, though, okay? So I'm actually into the science aspect of it, the individuation that leads to liberation. Meditation is a good tool to get there. It's gratifying to see a lot of people also stepping into that particular mode of understanding of reality.
Anyway, I got to go get another cup of coffee and then get back to work. The sun's moved, so I can get in and start scrubbing on that Glazing without sweating more than I'm dumping water on. Enough on the glazing. All right, take it easy. And harmony and individuation are not bad things.