Insidious Meme

Holey History – 12-28-2022

Holey History - 12-28-2022


Holey History - 12-28-2022

Hello humans. Hello humans.

Wednesday, December 28. A little after nine other driving day. Got a lot of those this week, mainly because of the storm that hit. We had a major windstorm here. They said gusts up to 60.

I don't think we quite got that at our area. I haven't examined the logs from the weather station yet, but like I say, I don't think it quite got that. It was a steady 15 to 20 with gusts up into the 30 range. It was a king tide. Many towns throughout Puget Sound flooded.

We had major flooding here. The beach is all a little cut. I have to drive down to the beach through is just all jammed up with logs and crap and so we didn't go to the dogs and I didn't go to the beach this morning even though it's clear. Er simply because I didn't want to stop and spend a half an hour even lumber or logs and sticks and stuff. Not lumber so much anyway.

It's promises to be a stormy day again.

We've got a major climate moving in. Oh my God. We were attacked by the climate. Oh, it was terrible. I actually had damage to my house and after I do all of my chores here today, I got to get the big ladder out and get up to the roof line and deal with some of the damage areas before the next windstorm comes in.

Problem with these kinds of things is that if you get like a little bit of twist or a tear or something in one of your surfaces, it'll catch the wind the next time and give you that much more grief. So you need to deal with it as it occurs now. Not in the middle of a storm or anything, but there you go. Anyway, so wanted to talk about history today and history in a very unusual sense and that is to say the stuff that's not there. Okay?

So the guys that I'm working with and there's two women involved, but they haven't put too much effort into the group. They've got their own issues going on where they're at. They're not in the US and stuff. So anyway, primarily it's males. But we approach things in sort of approaching our little bit of work here with a bit of scientific method and it dawns on me and I express this to the other guys.

And so we've set about examining history for what is not reported. And you would think, well, how are you going to find stuff that isn't there in the sense that you wouldn't even know how to look for something that you would mainly maybe only suspect was not there? And here's our situation. So we ask ourselves some questions and we say, when was money invented and when was currency invented? The two are not the same, okay?

Currency is simply anything that can be passed from person to person to allow a trade. So in that sense, you could have a currency of wooden nickels, you could have a currency of gold coins, or you could have a currency of diamonds or any number of things as long as it can be passed between individuals. Money arises when the substance that is the nominal venticular store of wealth does not pass between people. And so that's our working definition. It's very tricky.

Once we get into this. It turns out to be quite the big morass. So we don't know when money was invented. What we do know is that there's no explicit history written of the invention of money nor its evolution over time prior to our modern day. So only in these last couple of centuries have we had any descriptions of money now within our historical record.

Okay? So now we have to recognize that I've got some, like, you know, paid historians, right, that I'm not paying them, but these guys, that's what they do for a living. And they're throwing in the effort into our little group here, right? Which is der scheisberg. Who's why the second scheisberg?

Okay, anyway, so we ask ourselves, when was money invented as opposed to currency? We find records of currency going back through all the empires. We can find records of currency going back millennia, thousands of years. But we don't find records of money anywhere up until the last few centuries. But we know that that's not the case.

We know that there were Chinese currencies made out of paper that were in circulation 2000 years ago that collapsed, that we have a record of. And the only reason we have a record of them is because someone wrote down the hacious times they went through as that currency collapsed. We note the rise of the Greek empires, right? The Athenian empire, the spartan empire, et cetera, right? When these guys rose, these states rose.

They started off on currency that was silver coinage with some small amounts of gold. It was a bimetallic, but gold was really not well thought of. It was mainly for the state and state occasions, crowns and that kind of thing, right? Not really to be used as coinage, not to be used in circulation. At some point we know that money was developed or was in use about 600 BC in a particular Athenian empire.

But we don't have any record of it being created. We just have record of it becoming, of being in existence, casual notes that it existed. And there are people within our group that have gone to the trouble of saying there were books. We can find records of books written in antiquity in which the other books that were also written in antiquity, antiquity are mentioning these books and mentioning that they had something in them about the history of money, but not detailing what was in those books. So we have one book that's saying, hey, look, you know, so and so wrote this book and he talked about money.

And my conclusions based on his writing are the following. And then so it's just sort of like a footnote or an end note or a reference and they didn't copy the book or the details or any of that. So we know that these books did indeed exist, but we don't find any record of them. So one of two of the guys that are that are the historians say that it is factually true that you can since 1420, okay, so since 1420, our historians here can show that the Kazareans dominated the booksellers, okay, that they were the dominant force in bookselling and used books, and they still are today. And they also have a tendency to dominate the publishing business, which they grew into over time as money took over.

Now, bear in mind, money allows you to do things because you print the money and you don't have to have the wealth behind it and you can lie about it. And no one knows just how bankrupt your money really is based on real wealth. And so it's a really a marvelous thing to have these money situations. Anyway, we go back in our data examination, reading the ancient Greek text, reading hints about some Etruscan discussions of it, looking into the Chinese, the Sanskrit. There's a lot of stuff in Sanskrit that is about that is historically very significant.

Our problem is not very much of it's been translated.

Sanskrit was with its offshoot, which we think of its associated language of Poly, were the dominant languages in the Central Asia and the Eurasian continent for a long time. And then we had the Ice Age, and then we now have the remnants of those languages and those books that need to be translated and no one's ever done it. So truly we don't know what's in there. There are efforts on this to translate these, but there's so many volumes and Sanskrit is so little known and it's not very conducive to machine translation anyway for a number of reasons. And so it's going to be slow going anyway though.

So our thing here is in history, there's a lot of stuff we don't know. So we factually know references to other beings, okay? And these other beings have been described as coming from the sky, coming from space, coming from another world. All of these kinds of things exist in all the languages, in all history and in all cultures, across all cultures. And wherever we find historical records, we will encounter some level of discussion of what I term space aliens.

They may be hominids, it doesn't matter, right? In any event, though, so there is no lack of references to UFOs and space aliens, people from the sky within our historical record, but there's 100% lack of who invented money. Where did it first come into existence? How did it work in its early days? We know, for instance, that there were checks, actual checks, written on paper that were exchanged.

So they were the currency. The check was the currency being drawn against a stable amount of wealth that was held elsewhere and thus meets the definition of money. And we know that these checks were in existence 600 BC. We see evidence of this. We see the evidence of checks and a checking system of a sort in ancient Sumer.

We see it all throughout Europe. Everywhere we look into historical record, we will find evidence that money was in existence in those cultures way the fuck back when. We even see references obliquely to money as opposed to currency in the Codex Oralinda, which was codified in 800 Ad. And it goes back to arguably 200 BC. And so we know that there was money during that period of time in Central Europe.

And that one of the big problems that everybody had at that point was the name stealers, the Khazarians, because the Khazarians would have to travel to China from Europe. You'd basically have to go through the Caucus and Ural Mountains, right? And so in there you would encounter Ukraine or Kazarea. Same thing, same place. And Kazareans would invite you in.

They put you up in the best room in the house, give you a great meal, no charge, all of this kind of stuff, and kill you in your sleep. But before they would kill you, they would learn everything they could about you and take copious notes. And then after you were dead, they would take everything that you had with you and one of them would impersonate you and would go on to finish out your contract or whatever. So they would go and negotiate the contract in China, come back with no intention of ever delivering any of the goods. And they would so basically rip off both sides.

And so we find references to the name stealers in Chinese literature, Mongolian literature on both sides of the Kazarea people referred to them as the name stealers and the blood drinkers.

So all of that aside, we know that they were dealing with money. And in the Codex or Alinda times up to 800 Ad there was the Khazarians to deal with the name stealers. And you had to be careful about money and you had to be careful about even about counterfeiting. So this shit existed, but we don't have a record of who invented it, how it came into existence or any of that. And this is quite deliberate.

And so we've set out there Shisberg's White, the second scheisberg to the crew here to locate other stuff that doesn't show up, right? And so in our modern records, we have no records of all of the buildings of Tartaria, all of the great fires, the Chicago Fire. Go and look it up. When there was the Chicago Fire supposedly started by Mrs. O'Leary's cow, which it was not, it was actually started by the Freemasons.

The Freemasons burned down most of Tartaria and destroyed it here in the United States on orders from the lodge, from the Kazareans who created the freemasons in Europe and control them to this day. So if you get up to be 33rd degree freemason and from that point on, you know that at that point, it's far too late for you, but you know you're being controlled by the Khazarians, and there ain't shit you can do about it except, yes, sir, I'll do it anyway. So we don't have a history of money. We do have in many languages, in many historical records that have not been translated. We do have descriptions of ancient technologies, but again, these are like money.

Once they start reaching into the level where the descriptions are really exploring the technology, isolating it, that is to say, putting it into a historical perspective and all of this kind of stuff, and it gets written down. That writing disappears. Except for those instances where it cannot disappear in the form of the Chiseled Boss reliefs and the glyphs and so on, that we find in Mesoamerica. The Gobekley Teple is a book, all those stones in the way in which they're arranged, or a book about space aliens coming down here and doing genetic modifications on the life that they found here, not just humans, okay? And we know this to be factual.

So Gobekley Tepley refers to and shows a potato in Turkey. And the potato is an American hemisphere food that did not exist before the biblical times. And just prior to biblical times, when the l were down here genetically modifying people, they had to genetically modify foods as well. And so there was this one little tuber in South America that over the course of, like, no time that we can find, that is to say, literally only a couple of years, that one little tuber sprang up into over 300 varieties of potatoes that, for the most part, can be eaten by most humans. Now, nightshade, plants and all of that, but nonetheless so we have potatoes and tomatoes popping up on their own unbidden and just dominating the local agriculture thereafter.

And so this shit doesn't really happen, right? We don't know where the first person was that boiled a potato or any of this kind of stuff. Also, as part of our search of ancient literature and stuff, we have noted that almost all cultures have an instance of a person of knowledge that tells them shit, right? Somebody that comes along and usually it's pegged as a god. But these persons of knowledge come along and tell them, here's how you grow it.

You eat it. This way you got to boil the bugger or it's going to make you really sick, this kind of thing, right? Telling us all the rules that we even use to this day.

Personally, I find these historical surveys quite fascinating in the stuff that we learn. So at the same time that we see the potato originating in South America. We see maize originating in Central America and splitting off into 500 varieties of corn, a lot of which are not edible by humans. Some of them are specifically not edible by humans, but are very easily digested by our cattle and our horses and so on. And we don't use those corns now anyway though, so we've gone really stupid.

Instead of creating more varieties with more options, we're reducing our varieties. And this again is part of the Khazarian mafia central control sort of thing, right? Now these guys don't have the intelligence and the acumen. They're actually quite stupid, most of them. So the presumed and much vaunted Jewish intelligence doesn't exist, right?

These guys are clever, but they're not particularly intelligent. We know this because there's very few Jews that ever get inventions that ever do inventions. There's a lot of Jewish people that are on patents that claim inventions, but that's a different thing. You don't see a lot of Kazareans setting up shops for invention other than they support our bio labs, that kind of thing, right? So anyway though, there's other things in there.

So we have these hints of alien technologies being described, such as the Bimani in Sanskrit, but we don't see them translated over and worked in books and all of this. And those books that do do that have a tendency to disappear from circulation as they become old and they're sold, they're not resold, they're just bought up and destroyed. Nowadays, as I'd pointed out, the Kazareans have a real problem because all it takes is one copy in order to get it digitized and then anybody can print another copy and it's off and running, right? And so it's a very difficult time for the Kazareans in their control of history. Thus my optimism in the idea that we will get real human history and understand what the fuck's going on as we go forward here over these next few years.

Now, historically the use of money has been noted usually in our encounters with it, in those writings that are appearing at the end of these empires. Now we have to be cautious in making conclusions because it is logical that you're going to have as a social order arises and gets wealth and power and so on and so on. It is logical that we would expect that there would be more authoring, more writing at the end of an empire than at the beginning of an empire. Basically, you'd have some need for writing throughout the entire empire, reports and so on. But it is only at the end stages of empire where you get enough wealth that people have the freedom of time to sit down and do things like contemplative or historical or et cetera, et cetera, forms of writing.

And so we can't use that as a real metric as to when things are happening. But it's worth noting that we don't see any references to money creation. All we see are things after the fact to its existence. So very curious part of our history and the things that are not there. Again, the alien technology, the archaeologically discovered technology, these kind of things.

Now we're actually encountering some descriptions here and there in ancient works that point to archaeological discoveries. And so we've got a couple of pointers to what may have been an ancient UFO crash. Why these buggers crash, I don't know, right? They fly through space, but they're just so lame they can't land anyway. It's just odd.

But nonetheless, we do have some historical references to such things, but you don't see them in our literature today. So they're not being carried over. And I think this is quite deliberate. It's not a situation of people encountering a book in which the book is from a previous civilization or a previous empire. And in that book they say, over here on top of this flat rock on this mesa over here, we found this smashed up thing that looks like it flew from space and there was a dead critter in it and we buried the critter and look at all of the cool stuff that was lying around.

We don't see these things being carried over and investigated into the new rising empire. And a lot of this is quite deliberate in the sense that we see deliberate mind control techniques being put out as these empires arise to say that the stuff coming from the previous empire is a bunch of horseship, that it's all, as we now say, oh, it's all a religious deal, right? It's all some kind of imagery for meditation and not really a factual emergence of a space alien.

Kind of the reverse of Cory Good. Corey good came on to gaia. He was the useful idiot that the CIA chose to destroy burgeoning solid scientific approach to the UFOs issue. And Corey Good came out and said, yada, yada, yada, all this shit is true. And in fact, now he's saying, no, none of it was true.

Okay? So I knew Corey Good was a useful idiot or he was an idiot. I didn't know if he was useful or not at the time of his appearance with Gaia. Once I investigated Gaia, it became quite evident as to who owns the stock in Gaia and who is directing that firm. And at the time, Corey Good tried to force himself on Catherine Austin Fitz secret space program conferences.

And in fact, it was Corey Good's appearance, pumped up by Gaia, that sucked all the wind out of that whole effort and polluted everything with his stupidass stories and destroyed the very solid scientifically based exploration of stolen money, our back engineering of UFOs, all of these kind of things, right? Stuff that really fascinates me. I'm a techie and I want to get my hands on that tech. I want to understand how it works. Want to play with the ship and so I got really pissed.

Cory good coming out with his horseshit stories, and Catherine Austin Fitz, it wasn't her conference, but, I mean, she was one of the main pushers of it because she was the main force for it, because she had the receipts on all of the trillions of dollars that had gone missing. And we're talking trillions upon trillions upon trillions. It's all going into the space alien shit, and it's affecting and is affected by our current money problems, and it's magnifying them all. And things are going to come to a head, I think, in 2023, that is to say, personally, in 2023 or 2024, I think more likely 23, but nonetheless, I'm expecting a money collapse that will affect all of the black projects, shutting most of them down. Some they won't be able to shut down.

They'll have to do no matter what. And so maybe they'll have to pay those guys with gold or something, I don't know. Anyway, I expect that that will shut down, and we'll get the same kind of thing that we had with the Russians, only much more so. And that is to say scientists that are popping up saying, hey, look at this critter. I've been studying this tool for the last 20 years.

It came out of an archeological dig, and we found it with this spaceship, and we think it does XYZ. So I suspect that a lot of that will come out. Now we're seeing in our historical examination gaps. Okay? So as I say, there's no discussion for the most part in modern literature of ancient money creation, nor ancient encounters with aliens, nor archaeological encounters with the remnants of aliens.

And so there is a deliberate done by the CIA, I'm quite certain, just as a tool. I mean, they're not the operation. They're under the direction of the kazareans. They're all 33rd degree mason. They're all in the freemasons.

They're all blooded. They've got dirt on all of them. None of them can afford to ever say shit about any of their other guys because they're all in a criminal gang. And the criminal gang leaders at the top will just have them killed and dissolved, literally put into a barrel with some chemicals, some caustics, and their body doesn't exist anymore. So they can't afford to say shit.

But I know that or it's my conclusion that the CIA was behind the disruption of the real secret space program conferences and that they chose to use butthead corey Good, that's my official name, that's his title, is butthead, to use him as their useful idiot to cause that to happen. And it worked. And they had to put a lot of fucking money into it, but it worked for their purposes. There's no longer any of these real, solid, scientifically, financially audited kind of secret space program conferences anymore. And in fact, I think probably all the secret space program conferences, even the contact in the desert and all that kind of stuff is going to be very difficult to resurrect, especially now that Corey Good has been had to acknowledge that he lied.

Anyway, so interesting, right? We're coming into the cusp year. There's all of the aspects of the big ugly we've got major die offs. This is in many ways we're replicating things that occurred in 1177 BC at the collapse of the Bronze Age. And how far we'll go in replicating that collapse of the Bronze Age, I don't know, but we're probably going to come fairly close and for a lot of different reasons.

But anyway, our group at their scheisburger white, we're getting all whipped up because we have found that there is a deliberate, designed, planned and implemented approach to the destruction of specific elements of our history, as well as the distortion of everything else, including the timelines and all of this kind of stuff, right? Because of course you can understand that if you're going to remove things from history, like whole subjects, like the creation of money, you've got to have something basically in there to tie all this shit together and it fucks up with your timelines and stuff. So you will see evidence for it if you go to look, and indeed we are looking and we do see such evidence. It's quite fascinating, guys.

We're investigating some of the collapse issues now from the Bronze Age because a lot of those do appear to go, all right, so let me just state that some aspects of the collapse of the Bronze Age seem to have a connection to money, right?

We found evidence of money being in use for the last 6000 years, over the last 6000 years. And there are a certain there's a weighted amount of evidence that money was involved in the collapse of the Bronze Age in 1177 Ad. And so we'll got to pay attention to traffic and stuff here.

It's just interesting. So maybe the Bronze Age did not collapse because of all of the reasons that have been proffered throughout history, but maybe they collapsed because the banking system collapsed at that time, such as it was. Right? And I'll go into that in some other discussion. But in any event, though, so 2023 is going to be really cool.

I suspect we'll learn a whole lot. And I also suspect it's going to be very disruptive at a level that we have not seen to people's mental states. Okay? So there's a lot of people that have yet to acknowledge that falki lied and there's no study anywhere that showed that mass due squat to help anybody.

So since these guys are not even acknowledging something as recent as Falki lying, and they're either so stupid or so ignorant or so out of the loop that they just haven't gotten the word, or they're in deliberate denial that it actually occurred, whatever the issue, they are still doing it. And so I suspect that a lot of such people will be in denial about all of the other information that will be coming on out that will be much more devastating to our collective understanding of who we are and where we are. Okay, guys, take care. We're here now and got to do stuff.