mother WEFfing Earth Changes - 05-25-2023
Hello, humans. Hello, humans.
25 May 839 something like that. In the morning, probably like maybe 845. Sitting out, taking some sun. Hang on a second. No dog, leave my coffee alone.
She discovered she liked coffee. Probably it's just the cream and sugar. I don't know, maybe she likes coffee. Anyway, so, taking a break for going in and doing some work in the greenhouse, getting a bit of morning sun, and I thought to talk about my data process and how things work and some interesting conclusions I've come to recently. So I'm old, I'm retired, I'm in the no fucks given phase of life.
And so I got interested in where my process went wonky and why. Okay, I put a lot of time in it over these years. It was productive. It was extremely accurate in things like bitcoin, those sorts of things. I've got no reason to complain about it at all.
Well, okay, so I've got a lot of reasons to complain about it a shitload of work, but nonetheless, it was accurate in many regards and extremely accurate in a lot of different ways, but then it went wonky in other ways that it should not have, right?
It's like if you use a chunk of code to add a big column of figures, and while the figures changed every time you did the addition of them, say, maybe there's just 30 numbers, you're going to use a little software routine and you're going to add these 30 numbers and come up with a conclusion. And it works repeatedly. And every time you do an addition here, you throw away that column and you get a new column of numbers. And just because the numbers themselves change, the process of the addition does not, and the size of the sum should change, and that's an expected part of the process, but the process should not become inaccurate for any reason relative to the actual addition part. And yet that's what seemingly was going on within my software over these past 30 plus years, and I blamed a lot of it on censorship.
As it became apparent in like, 2007 that we were entering into a controlled language environment, I started thinking that it was a censorship that was causing some of these issues and an unexpected variance between timing results and emotional values on results. Okay? And I can get into the details at some point. I find it interesting, but probably most people won't. But nonetheless, here's the issue.
There were times when I had spectacular hits on Earth kind of changes, right, like manifest things like volcanoes and this sort of shit, right? One spectacular one. Whatever the cause of the earthquake was, both the timing and the result of the Bonda Aji earthquake, okay? That was way the fuck back when. That year before that earthquake happened, which was at the very end of the year, Boxing Day, december 26 before that earthquake happened, at the very beginning of that year, I had a forecast that described this earthquake, its damage level.
300,000 people killed, a nation knocked back to a previous age, cities scraped clean, all this kind of stuff accurately describing the earthquake. And I was doing that almost a year ahead of time. It was in January and February that I was doing the data run that provided that information about that earthquake. Now, it got a little wonky because there was another earthquake that year that had a celebrity component, so it had this heightened emotional impact. And my data set could not discriminate between these two earthquakes, which happened in the same year, separated by, like, eight months, right?
So I think it was maybe May of that year that we had the Scott Peterson trial in California during which there was an earthquake that caused the courtroom to be emptied by people jumping out of windows and shit, right? And that was in my data sets. All these descriptors of people freaking out and jumping out of windows and celebrities being involved, all this kind of thing. So I got that earthquake correct, but there was no 300,000 dead, there was no nation knocked back to a previous age, none of that.
So this is like May. And I thought, okay, this is really goofy here. It is so accurate in this, why not the rest? And I naturally assume it was my own screw up in interpreting the data. Hang on a second.
A lot of pollen out here.
Anyway. And so in interpreting the data, I just assumed I'd made a mistake. I didn't have the concept then of what's? What we now called data masking, where an event looms so large in one faction. In this case, the emotional intensity around the celebrity aspect of the Scott Peterson trial.
That it. Has a tendency to blend into and mask the difference in time between it and some other event within that same data run forecast period. And so I know that now I would have written it into the algorithm to discriminate against that so that I wouldn't have had that kind of an issue. But at the time, I didn't.
Hang on a second there. Okay, anyway, so we had that period of like, eight months where I thought that it had failed, and then we had the Bondage earthquake. And it's like, oh, okay, this stuff makes sense now. I'm thinking years on, decades on, why did this occur? Why were there so many failed predictions, timing wise and everything else relative to Earth kind of stuff, right?
Earth changes kind of stuff when it was so spectacular in the early days with those kinds of results and results I'd been getting in 2000 for 2001, 997 for 98, that kind of thing were really accurate. I thought I was really onto something, and then it faded. I couldn't figure out why it was. And I cast around for a lot of different reasons. But now, as I say, decades on, we now have the benefit of hindsight.
And it's like, oh, I understand what was going on. So at the time I was developing my algorithms and doing the actual data analysis, I was totally pig ignorant of the WEF and what they were doing. I wasn't paying any attention to the social order. In any event, I'm isolated. I've got my head down in tech under the best of circumstances.
I had some interest in markets and this kind of thing, but again, from a tech viewpoint, I wasn't really interested in the greater social movements at large within the society at that time. So I was basically blindsided, right? I didn't know the WEF was out there doing these things. The WEF was out there deliberately polluting language relative to earth changes that we might get to this point where they're global climate cris, and after having gone through the global warming, ice ages, the peak oil, all of these various different kinds of languages were a deliberate propaganda attempt to influence the body politic, influence the normies. And it did.
It had a great influence on the normies and all the French people. And so they were always popping up with all these earth changes things, right? Everything from Michael Scallion all the way through to anybody that was predicting all of this stuff, right? And a lot of guys had early hits up until about maybe 2003, 2005, something like that. And then everything really started getting bad relative to their the psychic's ability to pull stuff out of the manifesting.
Stew the spew that is our future ahead of those events coming in, they were really accurate up to a certain point. And that everything goes to hell. And it's in my opinion, it's because of the influence of the WEF at that point and how they had to seriously ramp everything up to get to the point where we're at now. And so I had already pegged 2005 as being a year in which I thought I saw manifestations within the Khazarians that they started to freak out, that there was something going on that was driving them to a level that had not been seen in my lifetime. I sort of was aware of them, sort of monitored them.
I didn't know they were active in the sense of I had never been one of those people that knew all the names of all the organizations and all the 13 families and all of the 300 families in this committee and all of that. Right. I just didn't really give a rat's ass about the nature of my enemy at that detail level because I didn't envision that it would become necessary for me to go and hunt the buggers down, that kind of thing. It was information I just didn't need to know that didn't influence my thinking. I had a very much higher level view of it and I could monitor things at that higher level, but in doing so and monitoring things at that higher level.
As I was working on my own stuff, I missed the fact that the Khazarians had become active through all of their organizations in this huge attempt to shift the social order globally. And because it was so low level, it was operating at a level that it influenced my process because all the information they were putting out in their effort to do climate, for instance, okay, so imagine what they had to go through. There's a whole cadre right now. They needed a layer of academia that was graduate and could be an expert in what they call climate science such that these people in academia could stand up as experts for the normies, to influence the normies. So they knew this.
So the WEF knew they needed this whole group of climate scientists now that are not really scientists. These are pseudoscience people that are only coming from the leftist proposition that the climate is out to kill everybody, right? Or that humanity is out to kill Earth. Neither of these propositions are true but they're coming only from this basis that we are the cause of the problem. So they have this inherent bent.
In order for these climate scientists who are now in their twenty s, thirty s and forty s to be here, the WEF had to start even earlier. So they had to start 20, 30, 40 years ago on this stuff and in fact they had to inculcate two previous generations in order to be able to graduate this class of climate scientists that have fueled the climate extremists of this point. Now, so if we look, they've been operating this proposition that climate is the ultimate evil or humans are the ultimate evil relative to climate and we must have munchausens by proxy and protect baby planet Earth from all the evil human doings. In order for that to occur, they had to have been working this in the 1950s.
So no wonder I was picking up erroneous information because it was all part of their scam. None of it was a factual representation, none of it was organic. Understanding of the body politic from which I was seeking prescient language, leaking out, all of that was engineered unwittingly and unknowingly on those people by the way, in which the mother Wefers were changing the language even back 40 and 50 and 60 years ago that they may arrive to this point today. So anyway, I'm interested in how my stuff fucked up. So this is sort of a Maya culpa.
I was guilty, right? I didn't see this. This has happened. I was trying to tune my software around the fact that not only was my summation of stuff being altered by the WEF but the data sources were being altered by the WEF in ways I did not understand by the Kazareans, right? And actually in this case probably in the last 20 years, very much so by the WEF as an actual organization, which is cool to see, they're going downhill greatly and all these organizations are failing, et cetera, as we move forward here.
This is all very gratifying, but now it makes sense as to why some of the accuracy in the early days and then everything failed so miserably as we enter into a period of like 2005 onward. And that's because that was when everything really ramped up relative to the Khazarians and their attempt to force us to this point here.
Anyway, so insofar as Altar reports and Earth changes and stuff, we've gone back, my guy, I, Gore and myself, there were a few instances where I really wanted to know, okay, and so I went back and I reran all the existing data sets at that time off of the Fukushima incident, right? And Fukushima was predicted. It happened. It was a global coastal event, but it's a global coastal event that's 120 years in the making because it could take that long for Fukushima to affect all the coasts. But at that same day we had an earthquake up here that caused bridge damage, that caused trucks to be held up, that caused cities to be isolated, all of this kind of stuff, although it was reasonably minor.
So under the circumstances, it didn't meet the emotional parameters of the intensity that had been projected and now scrubbing that for Weft language, I would not have made that prediction the way I did. It would have been basically a non event. I don't even know that it would have risen to the point that I would have included it in any of the report. So there's that aspect of it. So I suspect that this is true of everybody out there saying that, oh, there's going to be this giant catastrophe, this giant set of changes, it's going to kill most of the planet.
All of that. I suspect all of that information going back 60 plus years in my mind right now is polluted and deliberately so, because it takes so long to shift perceptions this way and cause these effects that the mother Wefers are desirous of. And they've been working at it this long. So in any event, so no, I don't think I know there's no like Naipiru and and you know, there's not going to be any Planet X and all of this sort of crud, right? This is all engineered bullshit coming from the Wefers deliberately because they put out a lot of these ideas, but also tangentially, because the ideas infect the thinking of those people that think themselves to be psychic and are relying on their minds not to be polluted and not to trick them.
Okay? So a lot of these psychic guys, they don't have process, they just have feelings, okay? And so they would have a feeling about something and it's, oh, I got this feeling about something. Well, that feeling has been engineered, dude, just like it was an engineered reaction in my data, and I was unaware of the engineering going on. And so I kept trying to tune it out, kept trying to figure out what was happening to the timing and stuff.
Eventually, I did get to the point where I understood, oh, and this was like I say about 2008, maybe censorship really ramped up. And I thought, oh shit, that's what I'm dealing with. And so it was sort of a miss application, a missed target, because it was not really the censorship in 2008 that was causing my problems. Me thinking that that censorship had been rolling out since, like, 2005 in a serious way and affecting the data sets. But it was rather that my data sets were polluted before I began my very first run.
That unbeknownst to me, the WEF had infiltrated the school system. They had decided back probably 45 years or more that it was going to be baby planet Earth as the target of the munchausens by proxy in order to get the normies to conform and kill themselves to save the poor baby planet Earth for some reason anyway. So just a quick little discussion about that aspect of the process, and maybe I'll get into some of the other stuff I've learned as a result of going through the Weft's language. Now, at some other point, but I got to go in and do greenhouse chores. The dog and the bugs are saying, get your ass to work.
Okay, talk to you guys later. Bye.