The Washington Post Interview: A Deep Dive into a Controversial Text
Episode Summary:
The document appears to be a transcript or conversation, possibly from an interview or discussion. The main topic revolves around a text message sent to an adult daughter. The content of the message is highlighted by the statement, "I have to give 50% of my income to Pop." The context or background of this message is not clear, and the participants in the conversation seem to be trying to interpret its meaning. There's a debate about the nature of the message, with one side suggesting it's circumstantial evidence, while the other side is unsure of its implications. The conversation gets heated with mentions of evidence and the significance of the text message. One participant feels that the message is indeed evidence, while the other is more skeptical. The discussion also touches upon the practices of The Washington Post, suggesting that this might be a media interview or a related setting. The participant being interviewed expresses frustration about the duration of the interview and the treatment they're receiving. The tone suggests a disagreement or conflict between the participants, with one feeling they might have been treated unfairly or set up.
The Washington Post Interview: A Deep Dive into a Controversial Text
What do you take from the text message to his adult daughter? Hundreds text message. I have to give 50% of my income to Pop. I have no idea what that means. I don't I have no idea what that means.
What's it's it's it's I know it's circumstantial evidence. And you prefer that? What what could I have no idea. But doesn't it? I don't know.
Well, I appreciate your has anybody has anybody asked her? I don't know. I don't know. Don't you think somebody should ask her? Okay.
Like, I'm not I just said I don't know, and I don't know what to make of it, so I have nothing but to say about it. Yeah, but you say there's no evidence of evidence, but then there's a text message where he says, I give Pop 50 cent of my money. That's evidence. Okay, well, okay, fine. Evidence.
I appreciate you having me on something like that. Who do you think is the mortgage? I listen to that. I'm saying I feel you want me to leave, like, just walk out in the middle of this, because that way you can you can go, is this a standard? Really?
This is the way The Washington Post handles people who disagree with when I agree to be on for 45 minutes and then I get on for an hour and 15. Yeah, that after a while, I go, Thanks.