Freaky Deaky! - 10-25-2023

Hello humans. Hello humans. It's still the 25th. It's about 11:15. Getting a late start, heading back out to the coast.

It's been cold. It was like 34, 36 this morning on the bluff, running down into the beach. All kinds of weird traffic shit here in town, out of town. They're ripping up sewers and stuff. Anyway, all right, so this is going to be a little bit of a general kind of a bitch and moan and a few things to talk about here, such as we need to really discuss the moon.

Things are heating up information wise relative to that. So now you can destroy your friends minds and your own and you can prove to yourself that the moon is not a sphere, okay? That there's some hinky shit going on up there and you can prove it to yourself very easily. You're going to need to get a ball table and a light, okay? It doesn't matter what size the ball is.

You could use an apple, you could use a tennis ball. It's easier with a large ball. So it's easier with like a basketball or something or a beach ball, right? It just makes it a little easier to visualize. But what you're going to do is this.

You're going to prove to yourself that the moon is not a sphere. And you'll do it this way.

You'll sit down at a table and put your ball, if it's small enough to fit on top of the table, put it about four or 5ft away from you, right? Put it in the middle of the table, take your chair and hike it back a little bit. So there's like 4ft distance between you and the ball there. And then what you do is examine. You're going to just sit there.

You need ambient light. You need light coming from above or whatever. It is helpful if there's only one light source in the room. All right, it doesn't really matter. You're going to get the same effect either way.

It's just a little easier to understand if there's only one light source anyway. And so what you're going to do is you're going to look at the ball, you're going to look at the sphere and you will notice some things. Right now I put a video posted a video that's from BitChute. It says the moon is not a sphere and you can prove it to yourself or something like that is the title. If you go and hunt for moon and sphere on BitChute and then put most recent, it'll show up.

It should be in like the top ten listings for you. And it has a bunch more information. We're going to just concentrate on one of these little examples, okay? This is the example of the sphere sitting in front of you. And so you've got this little sphere sitting out there and you've got light shining on it.

And then if you look at it, you will determine some things that are facts, okay? They are factual relative to the sphere. And it will be any sphere. So once you're done with a basketball, you could get a tennis ball. You could get a golf ball.

You can get one of those big bouncy, sit on chair balls. You can get an apple. You can get an orange. It does not matter. It works with all spheres.

This is how we prove the moon is not a sphere, okay? And so here's what you do. You examine this ball and you look for where the light is hitting it. And you want to look for where you can see it the sharpest, where there is the most detail. And that will be from your perspective, that will be the center of the ball that is closest to you.

It'll be the surface of the spear. If it's an apple or whatever, it'll be the surface of the spear that is closest to you. It'll have more light reflected to you than around on the edges. All right? And so this is the key thing.

If you look at that spot where there's the most light coming from the sphere, most light being reflected from the ball, where the tennis ball is the brightest, where the basketball is the brightest, and there's the most detail, you will see that's pretty much in the center of the sphere relative to your perspective. And that details shed off, they fall off. You lose details as you look towards the edges. And this is because the sphere is receding away from you, right? It's not all at the same plane relative to you.

And so the edges of the sphere approximately, if you were to just take it as a circle, about 6th of the way in on either side of that circle, you will find that's where the details just really start disappearing very rapidly. Okay? There are optical laws that are involved here, and I'm not going to get into the math. So about a third of the sphere, a 6th on one side and a 6th on the other, or a 6th on the bottom and a 6th on the top, relative to your perspective, will be faded out. There won't be much detail.

It'll be darker. It will appear to be in shadow. And that's because slightly in shadow dimmer. Right? And so basically what you're going to find is that the edges of all the spheres that you could possibly put in front of you, like that, the edges of those spheres from your perspective will be disappearing.

There'll be reduced light. They'll be further away from you, so to speak. Right? And so it seems like, well, this is a well, duh. You can't see as much detail because the edges are further away from you and the backside is nowhere near to you.

And so you can't even see that at all. And so you're sitting there and you're just looking at the tennis ball or the basketball or whatever the fuck it is. And you see that? Well, yeah, he's right. Look, the edges of the sphere fall away.

And so from a perspective of ambient reflected light coming back to your eyes, not all of the surface of the sphere is equidistant from your eyes. Therefore, some are going to show with less detail. And it turns out that's the edges and that you get the most detailed view of a spear from that portion of it that is closest to you and is directly within your sight. All right? So this is a sphere down here sitting on your desk or on the floor, wherever in your house.

Maybe it's a basketball, right? Maybe you get your kids basketball and you try it with that. And then here's the thing. Do that and then go look at the moon on a full moon night, okay? Or even you can really even do it on a crescent moon, but it's just so much easier on a full moon night.

And so you go and then you go look at the Moon, or even go look at pictures of the Moon. Photographs of the moon. And what do you see? You see that there is exactly the same level of detail all the way over to the edge of the moon.

You see that the detail continues at the same level from the center all the way out to the edge. So A, it's not a sphere. It is not a physical sphere. It is presenting to you as though it was a flat plate where all the surfaces are the same more or less equidistant from your eyes. And the edges are as sharp as the interior.

And you can go and look at this yourself and prove it to yourself on any full moon. And on every full moon, it will prove to you the Moon is not a sphere. Now, here's where it gets real tricky, okay? The Moon's not a flat plate. We also know that this is not a flat plate.

But there's information that we have now that tells us that the thing we look at up in the sky, the thing we see is a projection, all right? There is some form of a projection going on that presents the detail of the edges of that projection as much as the detail in the center of the projection. So, A, we know it's not a sphere because there's no degradation of light being reflected. It's all the same. The same amount of light is coming out of the edges of the Moon as it is out of the center of the moon, which is impossible on a sphere that's simply acting with reflected light.

And so we have to come to the conclusion that it's not a sphere. It is not as it's been told to us. It is not as it is being presented, all right? Now, we know all kinds of things from this it gets really into some serious physics here if you want to pursue it. But you can persuade yourself, you can prove to yourself that the Moon is not a sphere with just this one experiment that I told you about, looking at a regular sphere and then comparing that with the Moon.

And then thereafter, we have to start really speculating to say, okay, what the fuck's going on? What is it if it's not a spear? Well, because we've seen these waves go through the Moon image that we see, and theoretically, there's no atmosphere and all of this kind of horseshit that the mainstream academics would tell you are factual. But because that is the case that we've seen these ripples go through the Moon and you can even do some searches on, like, Google and stuff and get images, get Video images of these ripples going through the image of the Moon. And so we know that there is some level of projection coming at us.

There's a lot of reasons that we know the Moon is not flat. Okay.

We have some idea of the Moon's mass relative to the image that we're being presented. And the mass would say that it is about one and a half percent of what is Earth's mass, even though it is projecting a width that is about a quarter of our diameter, which should produce about something that's about a 16th of our mass. Many times, like 15 times more. Wouldn't be that'd be like seven and a half times more than the one and a half percent of the mass that we actually can assay by gravity experiments. So go do that.

Go look at a sphere. Next time there's a full Moon, go and look at it and prove to yourself that the Moon is not as it's being presented because the light coming from the edges is exactly the same as the light coming from the middle. Then start thinking about what this implies. Okay? All right.

So it implies by the nature of the circumstance that this is not a natural phenomenon. Okay? This is not a mirage the way you might get a mirage in the desert with appropriate light and humidity conditions.

We can speculate and say that this is a deliberate projection of a false reality. All right, so we know that the Moon is not spherical. It may be spherical under the projection. I think it's a device probably on the order of, like, a Death Star or something along those lines in terms of its size and so forth. Probably a structure with a skin around it.

So like a spaceship in that sense. But we don't know because we're on the other side of the projection. The only people who do know are the astronauts who have been to the Moon and notice that they're never ecstatic, that they're always dour every time you see these guys. And they were seriously affected by their going there and what they saw. Another thing they say is that the Moon's all black and white.

That's a little OD. But in any event, so the Moon is not a sphere. It itself may be a device. We know that the Moon is not a sphere. Thereafter, everything becomes speculation.

We're speculating on aspects of this, so we can speculate that it's a deliberate projection intended to fool us. Thereafter, you would have to speculate and say, Why? Who would want to do it? How are they doing it? All of the details that we know nothing at all about.

Right. That all of which would be speculation that we at this stage can't validate. But I know for sure, just getting back to my previous talk here. I know for sure that the Moon is not as mike at Dick Algae's remote viewing group as the tasker guy at Dick Algae's remote viewing group. The Moon is not, as this guy understands, so he's actually causing some issues with his understanding of the Moon in terms of tasking the remote viewer guys anyway.

So we can say to ourselves, we don't know what it is or who's in charge, but we know what it is not, and then we can start going on what else it's not, and so on and so on and so on. Right. It also means some interesting ripple effects. All right, so if the Moon is a device, it was brought here, it's not natural. The Moon did not occur by something smacking into the Earth and throwing out vast quantities of material.

Planets don't do that. The whole scenario is absolute. Horseshit invented by some academics that just wanted to get the kids to shut up and gave them some horseshit that they couldn't refute, so they accepted. All right, so we know that the origins of the Moon are not as told. We also know the Moon is much older than the Earth, based only on the samples that have been brought back, though, from the Moon by the astronauts.

And I can show how that may be invalid. Okay, so the Moon I think the Moon is a spaceship. If you're going to have a spaceship, in my way of thinking, it makes a lot of sense to put all the material that you're going to want to ever need, all the gravel for your cement and concrete and construction, all the raw material, metals, all of this stuff, just dump it on the outside. It's not going to hurt anything, and it's an easy place to carry it all. You can retrieve it easily, and it protects your spaceship from micrometeorites and all this kind of stuff.

Right. So the Moon is a spaceship with all of its materials, all of its raw materials on the outside as big piles of dirt and dust and shit.

If that's the case, then you could have your spaceship be tooling along through some particular area and discover, oh, look, we're running low on titanium there's a bunch of titanium on that planet over there. And so you go off and get a bunch of raw materials and you put it on the Moon. And then later on our guys come along and take samples of the material you've put on the outside of the Moon. And our stupid fucking academics are making the assumption that the material that they astronauts had found and brought back was there at the time the Moon was formed. Thus they can say, oh, the Moon is 40 million years older than we anticipated, and oh, it's 4 billion years old, which is older than the Earth.

And now I'm here to say that that's a false assumption. You don't know that the material on the outside of the Moon was in any way attached to the Moon's creation. And in my way of thinking, it probably was not. They probably went shopping before they went truck about. And so they may have just gone to a planet that was 5 billion years older than Earth and gotten a bunch of titanium and threw it on the top of the Moon.

We get some titanium crystals and analyze them and we say, oh, this fucker's 5 billion years older than Earth. And in fact, it's not, it has nothing to do with the age of the Moon or the Moon at all. It's just some shit they picked up along the way. More road work here anyway, so there's that aspect of it, right? So we cannot, in my opinion, we can't believe any of the horseshit that anybody is viewing about the Moon.

That doesn't acknowledge all of the non sequiturs, all the nonsense that we see about the Moon. That makes no sense at all relative to our reality with the Moon. Hang on, okay, I'm back here. Had to get out and deal with some stuff here, as long as we're being held up by big excavators filling dump trucks. Anyway, so our Moon is not a sphere.

Now, if it's a device, which I think it is, then what does that do to our astrology, right? Astronomy, it doesn't alter anything. It's just a device up there floating around like a satellite. It is a satellite. But if it's not natural, then hey, what about all of the astrology?

Ever since we've had the Moon pretty fucked up, right? All these astro people saying, oh, the Moon does this and the Moon does that, and so on. But they're thinking about it as though it were a naturally occurring planetary body. That is highly unusual. So note that almost, I think, all of the moons we've found in our solar system are a very small fraction of the planets around which they surround.

Which they orbit. So the moons of Mars are like 50 km across, right? They're small little fuckers. Our Moon shows an apparent diameter that's a quarter of Earth's diameter. And our Moon shows an apparent diameter that's about 2000 miles.

So even if our moon was a natural body, it is bizarre relative to all of the other moons in the solar system, none of which come up to that size. Okay, so it's not a sphere. It may be round underneath the projection, but we're never seeing the moon. We're seeing a projection that provides the same amount of light from all the way out to the edge. And so we know it's not a sphere.

We suspect it's being projected. We suspect that it's not natural, that this is not a naturally occurring thing like a mirage.

We also know that a lot of our stuff is speculation. On top of that will probably have to be thrown out at some point because it's not correct. And we're just speculating at this stage. But there are things that we can speculate that have a good chance of being factual. So if it's a device, someone had to make it, or something had to make it.

Right. Not a natural process. We don't see the universe forming machines around us other than biological machines.

So that means there's people involved at some level. Right. May not be human people, but nonetheless, there'd be people involved in building this device, and then there's going to be people involved in bringing it here. There's going to be people involved in or beings in keeping it here, keeping it where it's at and probably living in it and doing stuff in it. Right.

So it's speculation, but it's a pretty good speculation that the moon is inhabited. It may not now be inhabited by the beings that brought it here. We just don't know. Right.

But it's also from my way of thinking, it's quite factual that Penny Kelly's statements about there's war on the moon and it's almost over and the bad guys are defeated, that's horseshit. Absolute crap. It's something her mind's making up to keep her placated. It has no basis in reality. The remote viewing that's been done on the moon ever since Ingo Swan's days.

So we're talking the ever since Ingo Swan, every time he had remote viewed the moon under any circumstances, it shows up as inhabited and shit's going on up there. Right. I'm here to tell you that this is also the case with current remote viewers in the moon, all right? Even if those remote viewers are badly tasked by someone that thinks that there's Nazis living on the moon, that the Germans had gotten up there and set up a base, that person still thinks then that the moon is a naturally occurring body and not an artificial structure. And if it's an artificial structure, are you going to let a bunch of Nazis set up a colony on your artificial structure?

I don't think so. Plus, the Germans didn't have the technology, and we see no evidence whatsoever of the huge amount of resources that would be necessary to haul off planet in order to create a moon base or a colony, right? Because you don't have water, so you can't make cement without water. So you'd have to take vast quantities of water to make cement in order to even make the buildings for your moon base, that kind of thing. You get into this stuff.

I did an analysis with Chat GPT. You would not believe how easy it is to suss out certain kinds of materials being removed from the Earth, not entering into our industrial production, but yet being mined or harvested or whatever, right? That's all you have to look for is that gap that doesn't show up as being waste. And you would know that if it's this kind of quantity, you can anticipate that there's this many people being involved taking this stuff off the planet. And so I don't see any okay, so I don't see any evidence in the form of our industrial output metrics that would suggest that's occurring.

Now, you could not easily, but you could if you really worked at it, you could do things to disguise the removal of material from Earth for a space base on the moon or wherever. You could disguise that. It would be hellacious to do so, and it would be very vulnerable to AI examining these records and saying, no, this is bogus. And so you'd have to hide a lot of stuff, like stuff going into waste, agricultural products not being grown and harvested, but not entering into our economy and thus showing up as waste. But this would also just the mere fact that you did that would show a substantial increase in waste that is itself suspicious, and AI would be looking for that.

So anyway, though, so I've satisfied myself that we don't have these kind of disruptions going on now in terms of vast quantities of stuff being hauled off by Earth guys to the moon, right? It may be that there's space aliens coming down here and taking stuff, and that's a different line of discussion entirely, however, so I don't think there's any bases up there.

I come to the point where whoever it is that owns the moon and lives there probably isn't going to take too kindly to Earthers coming on up and setting up camps, right, and building houses and shit like that. They'd come on out and say, hey, dude, you're in our titanium field here. We got to do some mining. You got to move your shit. So there'd be that kind of stuff going on.

Anyway, so the other speculation okay, so getting back to the RV guys, right? So the RV guys continually RV guys, even today, are showing that the moon's inhabited. And especially if they look on, quote, the backside of the moon, they get all kinds of information about lots of activity and space aliens out there doing shit. So so, all right, so we can make some assumptions that there is a decently sized population up there based on some of the stuff coming from the remote viewers over these past few years. And then again, we're getting into more speculation here, right?

However, what is prompting me on this has been the many years of the anomalies of the Moon being brought up within my data sets and not being resolved by any release language or any of that. And now, since about September of 2022, I've had a very large and growing data set all focused on the Moon and especially the presence in the Moon, okay? In other words, the people, the life in the Moon. And as I say, this is going to fuck up our astrology. Astrologers are going to have to go back to school and think about this, but it's got huge kinds of ramifications for us.

But in my data set, the presence in the Moon is going to be going to be in our face in a couple of years, okay? So the fact that there is a presence in the Moon, that the Moon is inhabited, that it is not as it's being told to us, and that the academics are full of shit, all of this stuff will start coming out in a big way next year. A lot of it's going to come out because the school system is going to collapse. The colleges, the universities. It'll be just like in the Soviet Union.

We're going to get to a point where the money is, or even in the Weimar Republic in Germany, it all happens the same way anytime you get to the end of a fiat currency system in the Soviet Union, it was the Soviet ruble. It had been deliberately polluted by us to be destroyed in order to destroy the Soviet system. Yada, yada, yada. Bunch of history. But when you get to that point where you start getting double digit inflation on a monthly basis, it only takes about two to three months before you find the more stable employees that are able to take early retirement do so, okay?

They'll take early retirement. A month after that, lots of them will just quit. They'll quit for various different reasons, right, to establish some kind of a small stipend in the way of a retirement money coming in while they go out and try and hustle up real money to pay their bills, that sort of thing, right? So if you're 55 and you could retire early and you get a little tiny bit of money, then you're going to do it even though that little tiny bit of money is inadequate, it's because your whole salary is inadequate, right? And so what you'll do then is to go off and hustle up some other kind of work while having your little bit of retirement.

And so you're going to hope that that will get you through all of this. Lots of people that won't be able to retire will reach a point where they'll know, fuck it, Mabel, no point in working for this amount of money every month when it doesn't even make our rent, right? There's no point for someone going and spending 40 hours a week at a job which they probably do not like and not get enough money to pay their bills. And the people that that hits are on the lower order of the spectrum. And that's when you have the mass walk offs, right?

Whole companies will just fold. They'll just fade because basically over the course of like a week or so, people will simply stop coming in because it doesn't pay them to do so. Maybe they'll talk to the boss about it ahead of time and so on. And then ultimately everybody just leaves in frustration with the situation thereafter. It doesn't usually take that long before the governments collapse.

In our case, it's going to be part and parcel of that process because so many people work for the federal government. So, yes, I have to bear in mind that every college professor, every college employee, every university employee works for the federal government, whether they know it or not, because their institution that pays them and most of the money flowing through it is coming not from the fees and stuff that the students pay, but from grants, from investments, from research grants, all this kind of different shit that's all going to go to shit very rapidly as we get into this serious part of our dollar degradation, which we're there now. This is also going to be part of the split happening between the mainstream media and the rest of the people. It's like, why the fuck would you listen to CNN when they're telling you, hey, the biden economy is the best America's ever had. You people are doing so well.

Yada, yada, yada, right? All of which is horseshit, all of which is 100% different from your observed daily life. And you want to listen to people lie to you. Once you recognize that it's 100% lies, they'll just fall away. So I expect that process to take like 45 days, and maybe at the end of the 45 days, we'll see things like Fox News and CNN and all these places literally go bankrupt.

Shortly thereafter, though, you'll have millions of people walk away from working for the federal government, and it's going to create some weird conditions because one thing could have a lot of people milling around that are going to be very angry and they're going to want change. And so we're getting into that early next year, right?

It's a dangerous time. It's an exciting time. You wanted to be here for this time.

If you're young and you're living through this like you're 19 now, your grandkids will not believe the shit you're going to live through, right? You would not be able to tell them in any meaningful fashion what it was like for you to be here during these years. COVID and shit like that, that's nothing compared to what's coming. Absolutely. Nothing.

We'll look back on COVID as the little pause, the little vacation before the real shit hit. It's going to be that ferocious on us. And so I'm expecting that this time next year most of the federal government won't exist, that we will have had the start of the walkoffs, we may have had the bulk of the walk offs. There will be people that will still stay on the job for lots of different reasons. But in the main, the vast parts of the population working for the government won't, they just won't go in.

There won't be any point. They might be better off trying to get stipends from the government, that kind of thing. So anyway, here now I got to do other work.

A lot of the stuff coming out about the moon in the future will be doing so through the upcoming defunct academia.

That's going to have a big impact on the hyper novelty because you'll have so many people coming on out now that they're not bound by an institution now that they can't be canceled because there's nothing to cancel them from. They'll start talking about shit in a very real way. And this is going to be part of this hyper novelty and it's going to make everybody batshit, right? Hyper novelty is not going to be a good thing unless you're really prepared for it. A lot of people will make vast quantities of money on it, this kind of thing, because there'll be opportunity all the hell and gone, but it's going to be a rough time to live through, there's just no doubt of that.

And it's coming fairly quick. So now's the time to basically get your shit together, buy gold, silver, bitcoin cryptos and that kind of thing, because the death of the dollar is here and the crash of the system is going to be through the rest of this fall and in through winter and probably not very much of the current existing system. Banking, academia, government, all of that will be functional by spring of next year.

Usually it takes about five months for the whole process. If we look at the Weimar Republic, if we look at the Soviet Union, once you reach a certain point, nation takes about five months before governments collapse. This is the same way in all the banana republics and yada, yada, yada. We're at that point with the Biden regime, confidence is fading. Once you have a combination of confidence fading to the point where it's zip and you have the currency go bad, hey, you don't have a government anymore anyway, guys.

Take care. You have to take care because we're in hard times.